Sara Lee underwent several turnaround attempts over decades to address structural and strategic problems. Initial problems included a complex organizational structure, poor retailer relationships, and lack of innovation. Attempts in 1997 and 2000 included layoffs, asset sales, and brand reductions. A large 2001 acquisition of EarthGrains bakeries failed to generate profits. A new transformation plan centralized operations and sold underperforming brands, aiming to focus on growth areas and reduce costs through efficiency. Recommendations included developing health-focused products, aggregating brands by category, and improving financial management through cost control.
Sara Lee's Transformation into a Focused Consumer Brands Company
1. Sara Lee – A tale of
another turnaround
-Ajay Norman (DM18202)
-Ankur Kislaya (DM18206)
-Melissa (DM18233)
-Saurabh (DM18246)
-Shivam shukla (DM18248)
2. Introduction
Founded by Nathan Cummings.
Sales doubled to $2 billion by 1973.
In 1975 Bryan came into the picture.
Bryan acquired Hanes Corporation in 1979.
Domestic sources contributed 89% of its income, 30% of income from
abroad.
In 1978, Douwe Egberts was acquired.
Bryan wanted to have a diversified and decentralised company.
3. Contn..
Wanted to acquire brands with higher market shares.
The following acquisitions improved Consolidated’s pastry, coffee and
tea, and meat market shares:
Chef Pierre Pies, Superior Tea & Coffee Company and Gallo Salame (Italian dry
sausage product maker)
Jimmy Dean Meats (1984)
Sales figures:
$9 billion by 1987
$20 billion in worldwide sales by 2000
4. Initial Problems
In 2000, Steven Mcmillan became the CEO of Sara Lee.
Sara Lee focussed on its core categories:
Food
Underwear
Household products.
Structural problems persisted during 21st century.
Shareholder distrust with regards to Sara Lee’s product portfolio.
5. Internal problems
Complex organizational structure.
Poor relationships with its retailers (category-
buying).
No cooperation expected among divisions.
Lack of new and innovative products
6. External problem:
Consolidation within the grocery and other retail food
channels.
A loss in market share due to recession.
Lower sale prices and higher energy costs.
Failed to respond to changes in consumer trends.
Sara lee has little pricing power.
Bargaining power of consumers increased.
7. Attempts at Turnarounds – Sept
1997
$3 billion shares were repurchased by selling manufacturing facilities.
Reducing degree of vertical integration – “Deverticalization”.
Shift to Brand Management and Outsourcing.
There was an increase in stock prices.
Recalled contaminated meat
Affected credibility and failed to improve sales.
Share prices tumbled.
Growth from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 2000 was 2.2%
8. Attempts at Turnarounds – May
2000
Fired almost more than 13,000 employees.
Acquired Coach and Mark Cross leather goods.
Non-performing brands were removed to reduce costs.
Regional brands had been cut by half.
Lack of focus on key brands and growth.
Lack of product innovation.
9. The Largest Acquisition Yet
Purchased EarthGrains for $1.9 billion.
Consolidate a branded consumer business.
To brand EarthGrains’s baked goods with the Sara Lee brand
Leverage EarthGrains’s existing Direct Store Delivered (“DSD”) system
EarthGrains reported less than $100 million in operating profits
Shut down some of their 55 fresh bakeries and eliminated some regional breads.
10. The Transformation Plan
New Organization structure:
North American Retail to include bakery, packaged meats and coffee
retail business
North American Foodservice to include bakery, coffee and meats
foodservice
Sara Lee International will include bakery and beverage business outside
North America
North American food and beverages businesses to be located with
corporate staff and headquartered in Chicago
Share best practices and pursue growth along with development
opportunities for the employees
11. The Transformation Plan
Changes in the Portfolio (Portfolio action):
Sale of Branded Apparel, European Apparel business; Meats Europe;
Direct Selling and US Retail Coffee. These represent almost 40% of
company revenues ($ 8.2 billion)
Focus on smaller no of business segments that can result in growth
Operational Efficiency (To reduce cost):
Reduce the cost structure; increase R&D and Marketing spending for
small brands
Centralisation of the IT, procurement and services ($175 mn to $250 mn)
Reduction of manufacturing capacity in North America retail business
Cost saving will be offset by increase in marketing spending ($ 250 mn)
12. Recommendations
New Product Development:
For health conscious customers
Aggregating businesses:
By aggregating brands according to category – adapting to retailers
Better financial management:
By better cost management
Use better strategies for Hedging
Cost saving through centralization of back end operations