SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Running head: DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
1
DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
2
Draft Qualitative Research
Name: Vanessa Noa
Institution: Grand Canyon University
Draft Qualitative Research
Background of the Study
The first article talks about UTIs such as epidemiology,
mechanisms of infection and the preferences available for the
treatment. According to the article, there are indigenous sources
of bacteria that cause CAUTI (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). The
contamination comes from the hands that are contaminated from
the healthcare experts, meatal and vaginal colonization. The
pathogens can pass through intraluminal route, extra luminal
route or through the catheter from a bag that is contaminated.
Introduction of the objects that are sterile has demonstrated a
decrease in threat of bacteriuria in a closed urinary damage.
Conversely, studies have demonstrated that bacteriuria can take
place through the disruptions in the machines or through the
extraluminal path (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015).
The other article focuses on reducing the urinary catheter usage
and other approaches to avert catheter-connected urinary tract
infection. The article provides qualitative highlights of some of
the appropriate actions that a doctor must assume while
executing the process of catheterization. When undertaking the
supplement of the urinary catheter, a skilled professional should
take extraordinary safeguards since speedy release of urine from
the bladder may lead to hemorrhage. A clam needs to be out
after every twenty minutes to permit more release of urine
(Meddings et al., 2014).
Supporting Nursing Practice
The first article on urinary tract infections supports the nursing
practice as it touches on the usage of the catheter. According to
the article, people who urinate with the help of catheter have
elevated risk of contracting UTIs (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015).
Example of such group of people may include the people that
are hospitalized as well as people who have neurological issues
that make it hard to regulate their capacity to urinate and the
paralyzed individuals. Having known that, it is important to
take the necessary steps to decrease the threat of urinary tract
infections. People can drink more liquid particularly water
because it aids to dilute urine and confirms that one urinates
regularly hence permitting the bacteria to be flushed from the
urinary tract before the contamination can start (Flores-Mireles
et al., 2015).
The next article that touches on the reduction of the urinary
catheter usage and other approaches to deter urinary tract
infection that are linked to catheter highlights optional
approaches that are critical in the healthcare. It is the obligation
of the healthcare providers to be aware that catheters may be in
place through having catheter reminder intervention such as
verbal or written reminder as well as checklist. The
interventions can be initiated by nurses and can be targeted to
remind the nurses of the catheter (Meddings et al., 2014).
Method of Study
The methods of study deployed by the two articles are review of
the already existing literature through pointing out the
necessary concepts that should be followed in the course of the
study approach. The reviewed literatures can be accessed over
the internet and one has the privilege to go through various
articles that are relevant to the topic or issue in question
(Flores-Mireles et al., 2015).
The most apparent value of reviewing literatures as a method of
study is to evaluate the contemporary state of the research topic.
After determining the area that needs to be worked on,
conducting a search of relevant information is likely to assist in
determining what is already known concerning the topic and to
what extent the topic in question has been researched. However,
the main problem with reviewing literature as the method of
study is the fact that the process is not sufficiently critical. The
objective of research is to make a contribution that is original
hence contributing to the knowledge of humanity (Meddings et
al., 2014).
Results of the Study
The study points out that the pathogens pass through the
internal or the external routes through the catheter from a bag
that is already contaminated. The pathogens can also travel
along the external of the catheter in the shape of the mucous
sheath (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). However when an object
that is sterile is introduced, there tend to be a reduction in the
level of risk of bactariuria in a drainage system of a closed
urinary. Different studies have mentioned that can be present
through the breaks in the tools or external routes. At the end,
there is a considerable percentage of daily risk of the bacteria in
relation to catheterization (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015).
If nurses prolonged the process of catheterization then there is a
huge likelihood that the pathogens from the urine will make the
biofilms on the surface of the equipment. As days pass by, the
microorganisms start to colonize the surface of the machine in a
state that is immobile. Therefore, it becomes resistible to
antimicrobials and that means that their riddance will not be
possible without removal of the catheter. Therefore, that means
that using catheter has considerable amount of setbacks brought
about by its usage and this calls for alternative solutions to the
menace (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015).
On the other hand, it is the obligation of a professional to take
special considerations because the rapid drainage of the urine
from the bladder is likely to lead to profuse bleeding. There is a
general requirement that a clamp be unconstrained after every
15 minutes to enable release of the urine (Meddings et al.,
2014). Depending on the progressive nursing administration, a
clinician is required to measure and access the input of the urine
in span of 1-4 hours and incase of any changes in the ordinary
quantity of the urine which naturally is 1-2ml/kg/hr, then it is
the responsibility of the doctor to report the issues to the health
team that is around (Meddings et al., 2014). The physician is
required to follow sterilization through the process as this helps
in avoiding possible breaches of the closed system hence
reducing the risks of infection that is catheter affiliated. A
doctor is required to put the bag in the right position to prevent
the backflow of urine and alternate the tube to inhibit possible
backflow of the urine (Meddings et al., 2014).
On a larger extent, the two articles points out that taking the
necessary precautions when dealing with the patients that have
the catheter is critical to reduce the possibility of further
infection.
Ethical Considerations
The first ethical consideration is respect of the privacy and
invasion of the privacy can take place when private information
such as the opinions, records or attitudes are shared between
others devoid of the knowledge of the patient. A researcher
must not decide on behalf of other people on the issues that are
delicate. Vulnerable groups of persons are also an ethical
consideration that needs to be considered as a possible ethical
issue in the course of the research. The varied opinions
concerning the taking part of these groups in research can be
attributed to their inability to give informed consent and the
need for further protection. The researchers in the article have
taken these ethical issues into consideration as there are no
vulnerable groups of people in the society that have been
directly mentioned during the research and there is no privacy
that has been disclosed in the course of the research.
References
Flores-Mireles, A. L., Walker, J. N., Caparon, M., & Hultgren,
S. J. (2015). Urinary tract infections: epidemiology,
mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nature Reviews
Microbiology, 13(5), 269-284. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3432
Meddings, J., Rogers, M. A., Krein, S. L., Fakih, M. G.,
Olmsted, R. N., & Saint, S. (2014). Reducing unnecessary
urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-
associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ
Quality & Safety, 23(4), 277-289. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3960353/
Research Critique Guidelines
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of
the research study conducted, address each component below
for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the
quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.
Successful completion of this assignment requires that you
provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from
the study in your responses.
Qualitative Study
Background of Study:
· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to
the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that,
if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or
patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research
problem.
· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In
other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look
for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the
number of people affected by the clinical problem.
· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state
the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the
study goals, objectives, or aims.
· List research questions that the study was designed to answer.
If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt
to infer the questions from the answers.
· Were the purpose and research questions related to the
problem?
Method of Study:
· Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research
questions?
· Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the
study was developed? If so, what was it?
· Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies
relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature
did the author include?
· Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author
may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically
used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative
studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.
· Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the
available studies?
· Did the literature review include adequate information to build
a logical argument?
· When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of
qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or
diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework
developed from the study findings?
Results of Study
· What were the study findings?
· What are the implications to nursing?
· Explain how the findings contribute to nursing
knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education,
administration, or all areas of nursing?
Ethical Considerations
· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
· Was patient privacy protected?
· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or
lack of?
Conclusion
· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis
statement.
· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion
and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in
nursing practice.
· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the
utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
Quantitative Study
Background of Study:
· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to
the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that,
if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or
patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research
problem.
· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In
other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look
for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the
number of people affected by the clinical problem.
· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state
the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the
study goals, objectives, or aims.
· List research questions that the study was designed to answer.
If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt
to infer the questions from the answers.
· Were the purpose and research questions related to the
problem?
Methods of Study
· Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by
the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not
identify?
· Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or
participants?
· Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the
study?
· Was institutional review board approval obtained from the
agency in which the study was conducted?
· Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables)
identified and defined? What were these variables?
· How were data collected in this study?
· What rationale did the author provide for using this data
collection method?
· Identify the time period for data collection of the study.
· Describe the sequence of data collection events for a
participant.
· Describe the data management and analysis methods used in
the study.
· Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was
assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a
paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the
analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure
accuracy of the analysis?
· What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher
bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two
researchers independently analyze the data and compare their
analyses?
Results of Study
· What is the researcher's interpretation of findings?
· Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do
you have confidence in the findings?
· What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?
· Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?
· What implications do the findings have for nursing practice?
For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general
nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area
of nursing?
· What suggestions are made for further studies?
Ethical Considerations
· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
· Was patient privacy protected?
· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or
lack of?
Conclusion
· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis
statement.
· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion
and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in
nursing practice.
· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the
utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.
· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
Reference
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research
(5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
4

More Related Content

Similar to Running head DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .docx

Running head NURSING PROBLEM .docx
Running head NURSING PROBLEM                                     .docxRunning head NURSING PROBLEM                                     .docx
Running head NURSING PROBLEM .docx
glendar3
 
Research Critique Essay
Research Critique EssayResearch Critique Essay
Research Critique Essay
Olga Bautista
 
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docxPreventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
sdfghj21
 
D.p.h. 01
D.p.h. 01D.p.h. 01
D.p.h. 01
Lama K Banna
 
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docxRunning head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
jeanettehully
 
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
rhetttrevannion
 
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
sandibabcock
 
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
troutmanboris
 
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing ModelsHealth Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
Claudia Brown
 
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit ReviewJBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
Jessica Bryan
 
Specific quantitative.pptx
Specific quantitative.pptxSpecific quantitative.pptx
Specific quantitative.pptx
Chinna Chadayan
 
Communication issues regarding control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
Communication issues regarding  control of cervical cancer among rural women ...Communication issues regarding  control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
Communication issues regarding control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
Alexander Decker
 
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES .docx
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES             .docxRunning head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES             .docx
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES .docx
todd271
 
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
Renee Wardowski
 
Experimental epidemiology
 Experimental epidemiology Experimental epidemiology
Experimental epidemiology
improvemed
 
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGYEXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
improvemed
 
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
RAHUL PAL
 
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdfmedicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
Prachi Pandey
 
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docxCENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
sleeperharwell
 
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
Discover Health Global Initiative
 

Similar to Running head DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .docx (20)

Running head NURSING PROBLEM .docx
Running head NURSING PROBLEM                                     .docxRunning head NURSING PROBLEM                                     .docx
Running head NURSING PROBLEM .docx
 
Research Critique Essay
Research Critique EssayResearch Critique Essay
Research Critique Essay
 
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docxPreventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
Preventing nosocomial infections 2.docx
 
D.p.h. 01
D.p.h. 01D.p.h. 01
D.p.h. 01
 
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docxRunning head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
Running head PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJEC.docx
 
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
2Annotated Bibliography3164 wordsRough Draft o.docx
 
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
1-Evidence-based practice is what keeps the health care system u
 
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
4PICOT STATEMENTPICOT Statement and Literatur.docx
 
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing ModelsHealth Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
Health Assessment Of The Nursing Process And Nursing Models
 
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit ReviewJBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
JBry The Difference Between Physician Lit Review
 
Specific quantitative.pptx
Specific quantitative.pptxSpecific quantitative.pptx
Specific quantitative.pptx
 
Communication issues regarding control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
Communication issues regarding  control of cervical cancer among rural women ...Communication issues regarding  control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
Communication issues regarding control of cervical cancer among rural women ...
 
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES .docx
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES             .docxRunning head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES             .docx
Running head CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH ARTICLES .docx
 
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
Clinical Decision Support System ( Cdss )
 
Experimental epidemiology
 Experimental epidemiology Experimental epidemiology
Experimental epidemiology
 
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGYEXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
 
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
(I) MEDICAL RESEARCH_ UNIT_III_RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & BIOSTATISTICS.pptx
 
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdfmedicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
medicalresearch-research-methodologybiostatistics-231028034159-d884bb5e.pdf
 
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docxCENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
CENTRAL LINE-ASSOCIATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS2CENTRAL LINE-ASS.docx
 
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha scripts-30
 

More from todd271

Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES 1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES  1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docxRunning head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES  1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES 1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
todd271
 
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .docx
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS  .docxRunning head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS  .docx
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .docx
todd271
 
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docxRunning Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
todd271
 
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docxRunning head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
todd271
 
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY                           .docxRunning head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY                           .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY .docx
todd271
 
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docxRunning head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
todd271
 
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docxRunning head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
todd271
 
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docxRunning head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
todd271
 
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS                                     .docxRunning head CRIME ANALYSIS                                     .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS .docx
todd271
 
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docxRunning head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
todd271
 
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS .docx
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS          .docxRunning Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS          .docx
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS .docx
todd271
 
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES .docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES  .docxRunning Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES  .docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES .docx
todd271
 
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docxRunning Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
todd271
 
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docxRunning Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
todd271
 
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS 1 C.docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS                      1 C.docxRunning Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS                      1 C.docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS 1 C.docx
todd271
 
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS 1PAGE .docx
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS           1PAGE  .docxRunning head COUNSELOR ETHICS           1PAGE  .docx
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS 1PAGE .docx
todd271
 
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docxRunning Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
todd271
 
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docxRunning head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
todd271
 
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docxRunning head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
todd271
 
Running head COMPANY NAME .docx
Running head COMPANY NAME                                      .docxRunning head COMPANY NAME                                      .docx
Running head COMPANY NAME .docx
todd271
 

More from todd271 (20)

Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES 1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES  1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docxRunning head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES  1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
Running head CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES 1CRIMINOLOGICAL THEOR.docx
 
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .docx
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS  .docxRunning head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS  .docx
Running head COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 1COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS .docx
 
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docxRunning Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
Running Head Critical Evaluation on Note Taking1Critical Ev.docx
 
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docxRunning head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
Running head CRITIQUE QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, OR MIXED METHODS.docx
 
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY                           .docxRunning head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY                           .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY .docx
 
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docxRunning head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
Running head CRIMINAL JUSTICE FLOWCHART1CRIMINAL JUSTICE FL.docx
 
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docxRunning head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
Running head COMPANY OVERVIEW1COMPANY OVERVIEW2Co.docx
 
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docxRunning head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
Running head CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 1CRIMINAL BACKGROUND .docx
 
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS                                     .docxRunning head CRIME ANALYSIS                                     .docx
Running head CRIME ANALYSIS .docx
 
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docxRunning head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
Running head CRITICAL THINKING ASSIGNMENT1CRITICAL THINK.docx
 
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS .docx
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS          .docxRunning Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS          .docx
Running Head CRIMINOLOGY USE OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS .docx
 
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES .docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES  .docxRunning Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES  .docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER INCENTIVES .docx
 
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docxRunning Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
Running Head COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT2.docx
 
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docxRunning Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
Running Head CREATING A GROUP WIKI1CREATING A GROUP WIKI .docx
 
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS 1 C.docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS                      1 C.docxRunning Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS                      1 C.docx
Running Head CRITICAL ANALYSIS 1 C.docx
 
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS 1PAGE .docx
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS           1PAGE  .docxRunning head COUNSELOR ETHICS           1PAGE  .docx
Running head COUNSELOR ETHICS 1PAGE .docx
 
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docxRunning Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
Running Head COMMUNICATION TRAINING PLANCOMMUNICATION TR.docx
 
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docxRunning head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
Running head Commitment to Professionalism1Commitment to Prof.docx
 
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docxRunning head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
Running head COVER LETTER15Cover Lett.docx
 
Running head COMPANY NAME .docx
Running head COMPANY NAME                                      .docxRunning head COMPANY NAME                                      .docx
Running head COMPANY NAME .docx
 

Recently uploaded

Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsxData Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Prof. Dr. K. Adisesha
 
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
TechSoup
 
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptxPrésentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
siemaillard
 
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
EduSkills OECD
 
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptxBIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
RidwanHassanYusuf
 
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptxSWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
zuzanka
 
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
Educational Technology in the Health SciencesEducational Technology in the Health Sciences
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxChapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Denish Jangid
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Himanshu Rai
 
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptxRESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
zuzanka
 
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
indexPub
 
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
IsmaelVazquez38
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
blueshagoo1
 
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour TrainingNutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
melliereed
 
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptxNEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
iammrhaywood
 
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
danielkiash986
 
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
GeorgeMilliken2
 
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر   أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdfمصحف القراءات العشر   أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
سمير بسيوني
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsxData Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
 
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
 
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptxPrésentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
Présentationvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv2.pptx
 
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
 
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptxBIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
 
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptxSWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
 
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
 
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
Educational Technology in the Health SciencesEducational Technology in the Health Sciences
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
 
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxChapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
 
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem studentsRHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
 
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptxRESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
 
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
 
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
 
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
 
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour TrainingNutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
Nutrition Inc FY 2024, 4 - Hour Training
 
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptxNEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
 
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
 
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
 
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر   أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdfمصحف القراءات العشر   أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
 

Running head DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .docx

  • 1. Running head: DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH 1 DRAFT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH 2 Draft Qualitative Research Name: Vanessa Noa Institution: Grand Canyon University Draft Qualitative Research Background of the Study The first article talks about UTIs such as epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and the preferences available for the treatment. According to the article, there are indigenous sources of bacteria that cause CAUTI (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). The contamination comes from the hands that are contaminated from the healthcare experts, meatal and vaginal colonization. The pathogens can pass through intraluminal route, extra luminal
  • 2. route or through the catheter from a bag that is contaminated. Introduction of the objects that are sterile has demonstrated a decrease in threat of bacteriuria in a closed urinary damage. Conversely, studies have demonstrated that bacteriuria can take place through the disruptions in the machines or through the extraluminal path (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). The other article focuses on reducing the urinary catheter usage and other approaches to avert catheter-connected urinary tract infection. The article provides qualitative highlights of some of the appropriate actions that a doctor must assume while executing the process of catheterization. When undertaking the supplement of the urinary catheter, a skilled professional should take extraordinary safeguards since speedy release of urine from the bladder may lead to hemorrhage. A clam needs to be out after every twenty minutes to permit more release of urine (Meddings et al., 2014). Supporting Nursing Practice The first article on urinary tract infections supports the nursing practice as it touches on the usage of the catheter. According to the article, people who urinate with the help of catheter have elevated risk of contracting UTIs (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). Example of such group of people may include the people that are hospitalized as well as people who have neurological issues that make it hard to regulate their capacity to urinate and the paralyzed individuals. Having known that, it is important to take the necessary steps to decrease the threat of urinary tract infections. People can drink more liquid particularly water because it aids to dilute urine and confirms that one urinates regularly hence permitting the bacteria to be flushed from the urinary tract before the contamination can start (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). The next article that touches on the reduction of the urinary catheter usage and other approaches to deter urinary tract infection that are linked to catheter highlights optional approaches that are critical in the healthcare. It is the obligation of the healthcare providers to be aware that catheters may be in
  • 3. place through having catheter reminder intervention such as verbal or written reminder as well as checklist. The interventions can be initiated by nurses and can be targeted to remind the nurses of the catheter (Meddings et al., 2014). Method of Study The methods of study deployed by the two articles are review of the already existing literature through pointing out the necessary concepts that should be followed in the course of the study approach. The reviewed literatures can be accessed over the internet and one has the privilege to go through various articles that are relevant to the topic or issue in question (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). The most apparent value of reviewing literatures as a method of study is to evaluate the contemporary state of the research topic. After determining the area that needs to be worked on, conducting a search of relevant information is likely to assist in determining what is already known concerning the topic and to what extent the topic in question has been researched. However, the main problem with reviewing literature as the method of study is the fact that the process is not sufficiently critical. The objective of research is to make a contribution that is original hence contributing to the knowledge of humanity (Meddings et al., 2014). Results of the Study The study points out that the pathogens pass through the internal or the external routes through the catheter from a bag that is already contaminated. The pathogens can also travel along the external of the catheter in the shape of the mucous sheath (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). However when an object that is sterile is introduced, there tend to be a reduction in the level of risk of bactariuria in a drainage system of a closed urinary. Different studies have mentioned that can be present through the breaks in the tools or external routes. At the end, there is a considerable percentage of daily risk of the bacteria in relation to catheterization (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). If nurses prolonged the process of catheterization then there is a
  • 4. huge likelihood that the pathogens from the urine will make the biofilms on the surface of the equipment. As days pass by, the microorganisms start to colonize the surface of the machine in a state that is immobile. Therefore, it becomes resistible to antimicrobials and that means that their riddance will not be possible without removal of the catheter. Therefore, that means that using catheter has considerable amount of setbacks brought about by its usage and this calls for alternative solutions to the menace (Flores-Mireles et al., 2015). On the other hand, it is the obligation of a professional to take special considerations because the rapid drainage of the urine from the bladder is likely to lead to profuse bleeding. There is a general requirement that a clamp be unconstrained after every 15 minutes to enable release of the urine (Meddings et al., 2014). Depending on the progressive nursing administration, a clinician is required to measure and access the input of the urine in span of 1-4 hours and incase of any changes in the ordinary quantity of the urine which naturally is 1-2ml/kg/hr, then it is the responsibility of the doctor to report the issues to the health team that is around (Meddings et al., 2014). The physician is required to follow sterilization through the process as this helps in avoiding possible breaches of the closed system hence reducing the risks of infection that is catheter affiliated. A doctor is required to put the bag in the right position to prevent the backflow of urine and alternate the tube to inhibit possible backflow of the urine (Meddings et al., 2014). On a larger extent, the two articles points out that taking the necessary precautions when dealing with the patients that have the catheter is critical to reduce the possibility of further infection. Ethical Considerations The first ethical consideration is respect of the privacy and invasion of the privacy can take place when private information such as the opinions, records or attitudes are shared between others devoid of the knowledge of the patient. A researcher must not decide on behalf of other people on the issues that are
  • 5. delicate. Vulnerable groups of persons are also an ethical consideration that needs to be considered as a possible ethical issue in the course of the research. The varied opinions concerning the taking part of these groups in research can be attributed to their inability to give informed consent and the need for further protection. The researchers in the article have taken these ethical issues into consideration as there are no vulnerable groups of people in the society that have been directly mentioned during the research and there is no privacy that has been disclosed in the course of the research. References Flores-Mireles, A. L., Walker, J. N., Caparon, M., & Hultgren, S. J. (2015). Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13(5), 269-284. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3432 Meddings, J., Rogers, M. A., Krein, S. L., Fakih, M. G., Olmsted, R. N., & Saint, S. (2014). Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter- associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(4), 277-289. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3960353/ Research Critique Guidelines
  • 6. To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses. Qualitative Study Background of Study: · Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. · How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. · Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. · List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. · Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Method of Study: · Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? · Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it? · Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? · Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically
  • 7. used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study. · Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies? · Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? · When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? Results of Study · What were the study findings? · What are the implications to nursing? · Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Ethical Considerations · Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? · Was patient privacy protected? · Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion · Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. · Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. · Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. · Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Quantitative Study Background of Study:
  • 8. · Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. · How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. · Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. · List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. · Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Methods of Study · Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify? · Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants? · Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study? · Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted? · Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables? · How were data collected in this study? · What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method? · Identify the time period for data collection of the study. · Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant. · Describe the data management and analysis methods used in
  • 9. the study. · Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? · What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses? Results of Study · What is the researcher's interpretation of findings? · Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings? · What limitations of the study were identified by researchers? · Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings? · What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing? · What suggestions are made for further studies? Ethical Considerations · Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? · Was patient privacy protected? · Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion · Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. · Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. · Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. · Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
  • 10. Reference Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. 4