response1 A. Leadership paradox can be termed to as the alternative view of leadership which offers a model for realizing differentiated leadership (Tomkins, 2020). Leadership paradox may exists especially in groups because there are new systems which are out of the normal way of doing things. Such systems of relationships may possess atmospheres of anxiety and fear (Foldy & Buckley, 2016). Others might promote conditions of self-determination, freedom and openness. A leadership paradox, therefore, to an extent gives the ideology that leadership is a critical lever that can change /transform systems of fear into a system/systems of freedom. B. Participative management is a scenario whereby the employees are included in the decision making process which improves the overall value of a company. There are various ways that participative management can be encouraged in a work environment .For one, information has to be provided to the employees (Swearingen, 2017). This ensures that employees have enough information to invoke the right contemplation and work around to the problem in question. This can be implemented by establishment of the right and effective communication channels. Secondly, participative management will be encouraged by hiring employees with leadership skills (Bolle De Bal, 1992). This can be accomplished during the recruitment stage whereby only those that demonstrate critical thinking and leadership traits are retained. Third, training can be done to encourage participative management. In training, the employees are subjected to program with follow ups to a certain what the employees have learned. C. Within a group, conflicts will always occur. A serious bias in resolving this type of conflicts is the biased perception whereby there is the feeling of ‘we’ vs ‘they’ mentality. This leads to diversity and blaming the other group for the conflict (Swearingen, 2017). This bias tends to make the teams blame each other and this will only affect the work produced negatively. Further, the teams cannot work together because they feel the other team wants to sabotage them. ========================================================= response 2 A: A leadership paradox is that a leader first assumes responsibility for a recently shaped team and gets ready to construct their own approval yet couldn't get trusted by the majority of the team individuals. It is extremely disputable whether another leader ought to be too severe when managing the teammates for their supreme leadership. Truth be told, what most new leaders don't know is that most team individuals need more regard than the leader. So as to pick up individuals' trust and readiness to cooperate, an investment management style could be included. The managers of the undertaking ought to accept that workers' grumblings about the organization can't be viewed as thistles in the eyes and in the meat, however ought to be viewed as a statement of worry for the organization. These g.