Resilient Communities and Digital Jails

•

1 like•475 views

Protection for individuals in the Future Internet isn't only about privacy. Technology developers need to consider trade-offs between user privacy and institutional and community security mechanisms.

Education Business

Resilient Communities and Digital Jails

Mike Surridge / IT Innovation
Project FP7 ICT SESERV

Effectsplus Trustworthy ICT Research Roadmap Session
Cluster Meeting 29/30 March 2011

[1]
© University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre, 2011

Changes and Vision
 Key changes in online services and communities
 large increase in opportunities for cybercrime (already)
 large increase in online crime scale and diversity (diverse
attackers, methods, victims, severity levels, etc)
 overloading of law enforcement institutions (lack of expertise,
lack of resources, lack of tools)
 Vision
 criminal activity that can’t be largely prevented is tolerable: akin
to vandalism but not robbery or murder
 online communities cooperate with governments to combat
serious crimes: service operators, users, aggregators, etc
 online social structures and pressures combined with technical
measures limit the impact of other criminality: cyber-sanctions

Effectsplus Meetings 29/30 March 2011 IT InnovationRoadmap
© University of Southampton Research Centre, 2011 [2]

Challenges
 Key challenges
 how can [we] decide which crimes to ignore, address within the
community, or leave to institutional law enforcement?
• when is a copyright infringer a serious offender, when is an
aggressive traffic source or throttle a criminal obstruction?
 what sanctions could be imposed within the community, and how
can they be enforced (e.g. digital jail rather than physical jail)?
 how can/should communities support law enforcement to tackle
more serious crimes, and by what technical means?
 Approach: RTD themes?
 proportionate surveillance methods for classifying behaviour
 more socially robust and realistic models of privacy vs
accountability, for peer groups as well as government-citizen
 ‘vandal tolerant’ technologies for … everything

Effectsplus Meetings 29/30 March 2011 IT InnovationRoadmap
© University of Southampton Research Centre, 2011 [3]

Viewers also liked

Outsourcing SLA versus Cloud SLA by Jurian Burgers

ITpreneurs

Cloud computing that provides cheap and pay-as-you-go computing resources is rapidly gaining momentum as an alternative to traditional IT Infrastructure. As more and more consumers delegate their tasks to cloud providers, Service Level Agreements(SLA) between consumers and providers emerge as a key aspect. Due to the dynamic nature of the cloud, continuous monitoring on Quality of Service (QoS) attributes is necessary to enforce SLAs. Also numerous other factors such as trust (on the cloud provider) come into consideration, particularly for enterprise customers that may outsource its critical data. This complex nature of the cloud landscape warrants a sophisticated means of managing SLAs. This paper proposes a mechanism for managing SLAs in a cloud computing environment using the Web Service Level Agreement(WSLA) framework, developed for SLA monitoring and SLA enforcement in a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). We use the third party support feature of WSLA to delegate monitoring and enforcement tasks to other entities in order to solve the trust issues. We also present a real world use case to validate our proposal.

Sla in cloud

Pankesh Patel

Luis lima v3

EuroCloud

Despite the focus on eGovernment and the delivery of seamless services to citizens, Government continues to be challenged to deliver business interoperability goals. Interviews with Government Enterprise Architecture stakeholder and a search of the literature suggests why government has failed to achieve seamless service delivery. It appears that interoperability in government is largely a combination of bottom-up, standards or application design based approaches. These result in Information Systems solutions that achieve interoperability within the application and technology domains, but not the business domain. Consequently, the public sector operates as a fractured collection of departments, with much complexity and bureaucracy reducing the effectiveness and efficiency of service delivery. The Business Interoperability Framework (BIF) draws from three disciplines of management practice and applies industry standards. These practice areas are; Enterprise Architecture; Service Oriented Architecture; and Business Process Management. The frameworks, standards/specifications that will be referenced are ISO/IEC 10746 (RM-ODP), TOGAF®, OASIS, UMM, BMM, BPMN and ISO 15000. Key takeaways: -- How to achieve top-down business interoperability outcomes -- An architected framework for business success -- Methods and tools that can be used to deliver business/IT alignment

A Business Interoperability Framework for Government by Christine Stephenson

Craig Martin

Presentation of the Ph. D. dissertation SLA-Driven Cloud Computing Domain Representation and Management. This presentation explains a new methodology for the representation and management of Cloud services using SLA fragments. Cloud resources are described as independent SLA fragments, which are composed on the fly to create complete Cloud services. An architecture for the management of Cloud services is also presented. Cloudcompaas, an open source SLA-driven framework is introduced. Cloudcompaas implements the methodology and architecture presented earlier and enables the management of the complete lifecycle of Cloud services. Finally a set of experiments to validate the utility and performance of the contributions is presented.

Presentacion 1.10

Andres Garcia Garcia

A Study Of Cloud Computing

Jirayut Nimsaeng

Viewers also liked (6)

Outsourcing SLA versus Cloud SLA by Jurian Burgers

Sla in cloud

Luis lima v3

A Business Interoperability Framework for Government by Christine Stephenson

Presentacion 1.10

A Study Of Cloud Computing

More from ictseserv

Seserv concertation-01

ictseserv

Tussle analysis helps better understand the interrelations between Future Internet technologies and socio-economics. Its purpose is to study how such stakeholders interact by exploiting Future Internet technologies to advance their economic interests and influence economic outcomes. The presentation will motivate and apply a generic methodology for tussle analysis to the ETICS Approach for Providing QoS-enabled Inter-domain Services.

Socioeconomic Tussles Analysis of the ETICS Approach for Providing QoS-enable...

ictseserv

Cooperative Database Caching within Cloud Environments

ictseserv

Aims2012

ictseserv

Socio-Economic Aware Design of Future Network Technology (Y.FNsocioeconomic)

ictseserv

Eunice2012

ictseserv

Burkhard stiller cloiuds-fu-nems-2012

ictseserv

Fia aalborg-statement-iopapafi-v0.5

ictseserv

Vesa terava net neutrality in europe - seserv se workshop june 2012

ictseserv

Stephen minton tech transformation in the age of uncertainty - seserv se wo...

ictseserv

Sara de freitas the gamification of everyday life - seserv se workshop june...

ictseserv

Javier salcedo cloud computing - seserv se workshop june 2012

ictseserv

Falk von bornstaedt networks perspectives and analysis in the future intern...

ictseserv

Brian pickering introduction to seserv - seserv se workshop june 2012

ictseserv

Andrea Glorioso: No Disconnect Strategy - SESERV Workshop, June 2012

ictseserv

Alessandro bogliolo workshop introduction - seserv se workshop june 2012

ictseserv

Aleksandra kuczerawy privacy issues in future internet - seserv se workshop...

ictseserv

Alan hartman trust measurement and management - seserv se workshop june 2012

ictseserv

Socio-Economic Aware Design of Future Network Technology (Y.FNsocioeconomic)

ictseserv

Fia presentatie

ictseserv

More from ictseserv (20)