Open Research Data: Present and planned EC Policy, Jean-Claude Burgelman impl...Platforma Otwartej Nauki
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015. The conference was organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
OpenAIRE-COAR conference 2014: Open Access in H2020, by Anni Hellman - Europe...OpenAIRE
Presentation at the OpenAIRE-COAR Conference: "Open Access Movement to Reality: Putting the Pieces Together", Athens - May 21-22, 2014.
Open Access in H2020, by Anni Hellman - European Commission.
Open Research Data: Present and planned EC Policy, Jean-Claude Burgelman impl...Platforma Otwartej Nauki
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015. The conference was organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
OpenAIRE-COAR conference 2014: Open Access in H2020, by Anni Hellman - Europe...OpenAIRE
Presentation at the OpenAIRE-COAR Conference: "Open Access Movement to Reality: Putting the Pieces Together", Athens - May 21-22, 2014.
Open Access in H2020, by Anni Hellman - European Commission.
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015, conference organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
OpenAccess policies as tools for innovative research and educational challenges.Università di Padova
Intervention to the International Conference
The future of political science: an international and interdisciplinary conversation, Università degli Studi di Padova, 14-15 december 2012.
Connecting the dots - e-Infra services for open scienceOpenAIRE
Starting from Open access towards services for open science, we present OpenAIRE, OpenMinTeD and OpenUP, three EU projects that build services to facilitate and accelerate open science.
The section provides an overview of the open science requirements and how to comply with them stipulated by selected funders and organizations: H2020 & ERC, FWO and Belspo by Emilie Hermans
A summary of the key elements of the Horizon Europe open science policy and a detailed presentation of the European Commission's open access publishing platform, Open Research Europe
OpenAIRE webinar on Open Access in H2020 (OAW2016)OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE Webinar for project coordinators and researchers on Open Access to publications in H2020 - By Eloy Rodrigues and Pedro Principe (University of Minho, OpenAIRE Helpdesk & Training managers). Open Access Week 2016 initiatives.
Presentació a càrrec de Lluís Anglada, director de Ciència Oberta al CSUC, duta a terme a la Training Session on Open Science and Open Access al Centre de Recerca Matemàtica de la UAB l'11 de novembre de 2018
OpenAIRE webinar: Horizon 2020 Open Science Policies and beyond, with Emilie ...OpenAIRE
The global shift towards making research findings available free of charge and sharing and opening up the research process, so-called 'Open Science’, has been a core strategy in the European Commission to improve knowledge circulation and innovation.
It is illustrated in particular by the Open Science policies for the ECs framework programme.
In this webinar, I will talk about the OS policies for open access to scientific publications and the pilot for research data in Horizon 2020, followed by a preview of what to expect for Open Science in the new Horizon Europe programme.
---
The 2019 International Open Access Week will be held October 21-27, 2019. This year’s theme, “Open for Whom? Equity in Open Knowledge,” builds on the groundwork laid during last year’s focus of “Designing Equitable Foundations for Open Knowledge.”
As has become a tradition of sorts, OpenAIRE organises a series of webinars during this week, highlighting OpenAIRE activities, services and tools, and reach out to the wider community with relevant talks on many aspects of Open Science.
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015, conference organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015, conference organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
OpenAccess policies as tools for innovative research and educational challenges.Università di Padova
Intervention to the International Conference
The future of political science: an international and interdisciplinary conversation, Università degli Studi di Padova, 14-15 december 2012.
Connecting the dots - e-Infra services for open scienceOpenAIRE
Starting from Open access towards services for open science, we present OpenAIRE, OpenMinTeD and OpenUP, three EU projects that build services to facilitate and accelerate open science.
The section provides an overview of the open science requirements and how to comply with them stipulated by selected funders and organizations: H2020 & ERC, FWO and Belspo by Emilie Hermans
A summary of the key elements of the Horizon Europe open science policy and a detailed presentation of the European Commission's open access publishing platform, Open Research Europe
OpenAIRE webinar on Open Access in H2020 (OAW2016)OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE Webinar for project coordinators and researchers on Open Access to publications in H2020 - By Eloy Rodrigues and Pedro Principe (University of Minho, OpenAIRE Helpdesk & Training managers). Open Access Week 2016 initiatives.
Presentació a càrrec de Lluís Anglada, director de Ciència Oberta al CSUC, duta a terme a la Training Session on Open Science and Open Access al Centre de Recerca Matemàtica de la UAB l'11 de novembre de 2018
OpenAIRE webinar: Horizon 2020 Open Science Policies and beyond, with Emilie ...OpenAIRE
The global shift towards making research findings available free of charge and sharing and opening up the research process, so-called 'Open Science’, has been a core strategy in the European Commission to improve knowledge circulation and innovation.
It is illustrated in particular by the Open Science policies for the ECs framework programme.
In this webinar, I will talk about the OS policies for open access to scientific publications and the pilot for research data in Horizon 2020, followed by a preview of what to expect for Open Science in the new Horizon Europe programme.
---
The 2019 International Open Access Week will be held October 21-27, 2019. This year’s theme, “Open for Whom? Equity in Open Knowledge,” builds on the groundwork laid during last year’s focus of “Designing Equitable Foundations for Open Knowledge.”
As has become a tradition of sorts, OpenAIRE organises a series of webinars during this week, highlighting OpenAIRE activities, services and tools, and reach out to the wider community with relevant talks on many aspects of Open Science.
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015, conference organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
Vortrag im Rahmen der EERA-Session: Open Science and Educational Research? Inclusion and Exclusion at the European Open Science Cloud; am 5. September 2018 in Bolzano (Italien).
European Commission
DG Research and Innovation
RTD.A2. Open Data Policy and Science Cloud
Katarzyna Szkuta
The European Commission's proposal for embedding open science in horizon europe. Particular emphasis on open access and research data management aspects. Also presenting the new publishing platform of the Commission, Open Research Europe
The presentation discusses the current largely commercial-based publishing system and contextualizes it within the research assessment system. It presents institution-based non-for -profit publishing initiaves and the European Commissions policies and supports in the direction of empowering this type of scholarly communication.
Open Source & Open Data Session report from imaGIne 2014 ConferenceGSDI Association
Session report from the imaGIne 2014 Conference held in Berlin, Germany, in October 2014. Session was chaired by Dr. Gabor Remetey-Fulopp, of HUNAGI, who were co-organisers for Session 8C1.
Presentació a càrrec de Lluís Anglada, director de Ciència Oberta al CSUC, duta a terme dins el panell "Sustainable Libraries: Open Science Perspective" del congrés ANKOS Link celebrat del 2 al 5 d'abril a Antalya (Turquia) .
Similar to Research and Innovation in transformation: the transition to Open Science (20)
The presentation we gave at two workshops on Open Access policies organised by EU-funded project PASTEUR4OA on 9 & 10 February 2016 in Brussels. Basically, nothing really new, but this is probably the shortest presentation we have made to present the European Commission mandate for open access in Horizon 2020.
A research-friendly copyright environment in the digital age: a European pers...Jean-François Dechamp
A 30-minute presentation that builds the case for a copyright exception for scientific research in the European legislation, in order to allow data analytics (Text and Data Mining / TDM)
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Research and Innovation in transformation: the transition to Open Science
1. Research and Innovation
in transformation: the
transition to Open Science
Jean-François Dechamp
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research & Innovation
NARMA vårkonferanse 2018 – Open Science
6-7 March 2018, Lillestrøm, Norway
2. What is the European Commission?
A policy maker
• It proposes EU legislation
• It legislates with other Community
institutions (European Parliament,
Council...)
• It invites Member States to act
A funding agency
• It sets its own rules for EC-funded
scientific research and innovation
A capacity builder
• It funds projects that support EC/EU
policy
3. How does the EC work?
A large organisation
• 32,000 people
With other Institutions
• Council (Member States),
EP, Committees, Agencies
etc.
And "Stakeholders"
• "The Bubble"
• International partners etc.
4. Open Science: where to start?
With open access = the practice of providing on-line access to
scientific information that is free of charge to the user and
that is re-usable
No single definition but some well-accepted, authoritative
ones e.g. the Budapest Declaration (2002) and the Berlin
Declaration (2003).
• These definitions describe 'access' in the context of open access as including not
only basic elements such as the right to read, download and print, but also the
right to copy, distribute, search, link, crawl, and mine
Open access to research outputs: publications, data, software
and other outputs
For publications:
• Open access publishing, i.e. publishing in an open access mode/venue (Gold OA)
• Making accessible through repositories (Green OA)
5. Open Science: what transformation
are we talking about?
The nature of science
(modus operandi) is
changing from a closed
system to an open and
sharing one
• It affects virtually all
components of doing
science and research
• It shifts in particular the
focus from "publishing
as fast as possible" to
"sharing knowledge as
early as possible"
Illustration: Ron Dekker, CESSDA
6. How is the R&I ecosystem affected?
Source: https://101innovations.wordpress.com/press/
7. How to describe Open Science?
There are many definitions
but maybe Open Science is:
• A system of practices that
moves towards a more open,
collaborative, data-intensive and
networked way of doing
research and sharing research
results, enabled by
developments in ICT and related
infrastructures and the
increasing proliferation of data.
Or Open Science is:
• Just science done right!
Stickers: Melanie Himming, ImmingImpact
8. How did we end up here?
Many interpretations and theories on why the
way we do science is changing:
• Digitization
• Data availability & production (exponential growth)
• Technology
• Discovery of a new transparency
• Accountability, responsiveness and reproducibility
• Opportunity to better connect with the
society at large
• Including involvement of citizens, the 'digital natives'
9. Why is Open Science so important?
It's good for science: efficiency, verifiability,
transparency, inter-disciplinarity
It's good for the economy: access to and re-use
of scientific information by industry, innovation
It's good for society: broader, faster, transparent
& equal access for citizens, increased societal
impact of science and research
Open Science is irreversible and
is not happening in isolation
10. One example of the gains arising
from open research data
1.3 Billion EUR per year
• Benefits identified by the
European Bioinformatics
Institute to users and their
funders just by making
scientific information freely
available to the global life
science community
This is equivalent to more
than 20 times the direct
operational cost of the
Institute
Source: Charles Beagrie Ltd. For EMBL-EBI
11. What has the EC been doing so far?
2007
• EC Communication on Scientific Information
2008
• FP7 OA Pilot
2012
• Recommendation on scientific information & ERA Communication
2014 • Horizon 2020 OA and ORD policies
2015
• Digital Single Market (DSM) strategy
2016
• Council Conclusions on open science (Member States)
2016
• European Cloud Initiative Communication (ECI)
2018
• Revision of the 2012 Recommendation in conjunction with PSI Directive
2018-
• Preparing Open Science for FP9
14. The easy one: publications
Mandatory open access to peer-reviewed
publications through repositories at the same
time as publication.
• Acceptable embargo: 6M and up to 12M for SSH
• Open access publishing encouraged and APCs eligible
costs
• Gradual emphasis on monitoring and on 'sanctions'
• Current success rate: about 68% (depending on the
method of calculation)
15. The less easy one: research data
By default participation in the ORD extended pilot
• Targeted primarily towards data underlying publications (other data as
specified in Data Management Plan)
• Robust opt outs options for IPR, confidentiality/privacy and security
reason as well as if OA runs against the main objective of the project
• Whether projects opt-out or not does not affect the evaluation
Required to develop DMP as a deliverable
• Significance placed on DMP as avenue to streamline sound data
management practices
• What data will be generated; how curation, preservation and
sustainability will be ensured; what parts will be open
Costs for open access to research data fully eligible
16. The evolution of the EU funding
programmes for R&I
FP7
OA Green or
Gold+Green
Pilot
H2020
OA Green or
Gold+Green
obligation
& ORD/DMP Pilot
H2020
OA Green or
Gold+Green
obligation
& ORD/DMP by
default
FP9
Will go beyond
OA embrace
and embed
Open Science
17. "FP9"
• The 'Lamy report' proposes a
new FP that fully supports
Open Science at all levels
• The new FP will probably
strengthen & clarify current
open access requirements,
and incentivize and reward
Open Science
• Open Science should also be
considered from our side as a
funder (in the evaluation of
proposals, monitoring of the
impact of "FP9" etc.)
18. How politically important is OS?
• One of the three priorities of Cssr Moedas
• The Netherlands make the goal of default
OS, Finland created a cross cutting OS
policy approach, France is creating one,
several Lander in Germany have
dedicated platforms or approaches &
federal approach in the making, DK
issued an analysis on implementing FAIR
data etc.
• Australia, China, G7 countries...
• The EU Framework Programmes and
all national funding programmes
must be in sync with Open Science
20. Going together in the same direction
2012 Recommendation on scientific information
• Still valid but technical update expected in spring 2018
• Sharper focus on aspects such as copyright/TDM,
rewards, skills etc.
Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science
• EU Dutch Presidency conference on Open Science of April
2016 (key principles and goals)
• Follow up on its way: national plan on Open Science,
various initiatives etc.
Open Science Policy Platform
• The EC bringing stakeholders at the same table
21. EU Member States (and Norway)
support Open Science
The Council Conclusions of 26-27 May 2016:
• ACKNOWLEDGES that open science has the potential to increase the
quality, impact and benefits of science and to accelerate advancement
of knowledge by making it […] better understandable by society and
responsive to societal challenges […]
• AGREES to further promote the mainstreaming of open access to
scientific publications by continuing to support a transition to
immediate open access as the default by 2020
• Research data: 'as open as possible, as closed as necessary'.
National Points of Reference
• Website and activities
• Norway: Katrine Weisteen Bjerde (CERES)
• Report to be released in spring 2018
22. Two important challenges
European Open Science Cloud
• A federated environment for cloud-based research and access
to data
• Vision: give Europe a global lead in scientific data
infrastructures & offer a virtual environment with free at the
point of use, open and seamless services for storage,
management, analysis, and re-use of research data, across
borders and scientific disciplines
Open research publishing platform
• Aim: offer Horizon 2020 beneficiaries a free and fast
publication possibility for peer reviewed articles & pre-prints
• Public procurement to be announced in spring 2018
25. Personal thoughts
Overall aim
• kick-starting a virtuous circle and change of culture
Issues
• Explanation: paramount
• Tools and support: needed
• Money: both a bad and a good excuse
• Feedback: important
• Monitoring: complex (see Open Science Monitor)
• Reward: the key
26. Issues to watch
Legal issues
• Copyright Directive, Database Directive, Public Sector Initiative (PSI) Directive
• Licences and Text and Data Mining (TDM)
Alternative publishing models
• Including agreements with publishers, 'offsetting deals' etc.
FAIR data
• Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable
Skills
• Access to professional training to develop appropriate skills to fully engage with
open science
Metrics and indicators adapted to Open Science
• Incentives, acknowledgment and reward are key in a professional career
• Adapt the rewarding mechanisms to researchers for their sharing
• From Publish or perish to Share and succeed?
27. Thank you!
With Open Science, we want to give European
researchers and innovators the best
conditions to do their job.
Twitter: @JF_Dechamp
Mail: RTD-open-access@ec.europa.eu
Web: ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and illustrations are in the
public domain (otherwise the origin is mentioned)