Apresentação do Prof. Dr. Olavo Bohrer Amaral na Reunião de Editores Científicos do CRICS10, em 04/12/2018
http://crics10.org/eventos/pt/event/reuniao-de-editores-cientificos/
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
CEPLAS Cologne June 2017: Research misconduct; science‘s self administered ...Leonid Schneider
Workshop presentation at International CEPLAS Summer School 2017 – „Emerging Frontiers in Plant Sciences“ June 5th – 9th, 2017 Sportschule Hennef, Germany
Computational Reproducibility vs. Transparency: Is It FAIR Enough?Bertram Ludäscher
Keynote at CLIR Workshop (Webinar): Torward Open, Reproducible, and Reusable Research. February 10, 2021. https://reusableresearch.com/
ABSTRACT. The “reproducibility crisis” has resulted in much interest in methods and tools to improve computational reproducibility. FAIR data principles (data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) are also being adapted and evolved to apply to other artifacts, notably computational analyses (scientific workflows, Jupyter notebooks, etc.). The current focus on computational reproducibility of scripts and other computational workflows sometimes overshadows a somewhat neglected and arguably more important issue: transparency of data analysis, including data wrangling and cleaning. In this talk I will ask the question: What information is gained by conducting a reproducibility experiment? This leads to a simple model (PRIMAD) that aims to answer this question by sorting out different scenarios. Finally, I will present some features of Whole-Tale, a computational platform for reproducible and transparent computational experiments.
This lecture looks at:
- An explanation of each of the steps in the research process flowchart
- Types of data
- Generating and testing theories
- Measurement error
- Validity
- Reliability
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
CEPLAS Cologne June 2017: Research misconduct; science‘s self administered ...Leonid Schneider
Workshop presentation at International CEPLAS Summer School 2017 – „Emerging Frontiers in Plant Sciences“ June 5th – 9th, 2017 Sportschule Hennef, Germany
Computational Reproducibility vs. Transparency: Is It FAIR Enough?Bertram Ludäscher
Keynote at CLIR Workshop (Webinar): Torward Open, Reproducible, and Reusable Research. February 10, 2021. https://reusableresearch.com/
ABSTRACT. The “reproducibility crisis” has resulted in much interest in methods and tools to improve computational reproducibility. FAIR data principles (data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) are also being adapted and evolved to apply to other artifacts, notably computational analyses (scientific workflows, Jupyter notebooks, etc.). The current focus on computational reproducibility of scripts and other computational workflows sometimes overshadows a somewhat neglected and arguably more important issue: transparency of data analysis, including data wrangling and cleaning. In this talk I will ask the question: What information is gained by conducting a reproducibility experiment? This leads to a simple model (PRIMAD) that aims to answer this question by sorting out different scenarios. Finally, I will present some features of Whole-Tale, a computational platform for reproducible and transparent computational experiments.
This lecture looks at:
- An explanation of each of the steps in the research process flowchart
- Types of data
- Generating and testing theories
- Measurement error
- Validity
- Reliability
sience 2.0 : an illustration of good research practices in a real studywolf vanpaemel
a presentation explaining the what, how and why of some of the features of science 2.0 (replication, registration, high power, bayesian statistics, estimation, co-pilot multi-software approach, distinction between confirmatory and exploratory analyses, and open science) using steegen et al. (2014) as a running example.
What's the Science in Data Science? - Skipper SeaboldPyData
The gold standard for validating any scientific assumption is to run an experiment. Data science isn’t any different. Unfortunately, it’s not always possible to design the perfect experiment. In this talk, we’ll take a realistic look at measurement using tools from the social sciences to conduct quasi-experiments with observational data.
This lecture talks about the importance of evidence in scientific, business, and innovation research. It lists down important examples to carry this process in perspective of the problem statement.
slides will make you understand current issues of nursing research and envisioning future scope or you say journey from nursing research to nurse scientist
Gnuteca / BiblioSUS: Capacitação sobre indexação de documentos segundo a Metodologia LILACS para o sistema Gnuteca.
Data: 22/03/2022
Apresentação: Sueli Suga
Gnuteca / BiblioSUS: Capacitação sobre indexação de documentos segundo a Meto...http://bvsalud.org/
Projeto Gnuteca / BiblioSUS: Capacitação sobre indexação de documentos segundo a Metodologia LILACS para o sistema Gnuteca.
Data: 15/03/2022
Apresentação: Sueli Suga
Cómo vamos a seguir en 2022: Apertura del calendario anual de las reuniones d...http://bvsalud.org/
Fortalecimiento de las Redes de Información en Salud en AL&C - Reunión de Apertura del Calendario de Anual de Reuniones:
Cómo vamos a seguir en 2022 por Verônica Abdala, Gerente, SCI/PFI, BIREME/OPS/OMS.
Fortalecimiento de las Redes de Información en Salud en AL&C - Reunión de Apertura del Calendario de Anual de Reuniones: La importancia de las Redes de Información para el desarrollo de los Productos y Servicios de BIREME por Dr. Sebastian Garcia Saiso, Director EIH/OPS/OMS, Director Interino BIREME/OPS/OMS.
Presentar las actividades desarrolladas en el trimestre III (septiembre – noviembre) y los principales resultados del Plan de Acción 2021. VI Reunión de la Red.
(9 de 9) Destaques de las Capacitaciones sobre indización de documentos según...http://bvsalud.org/
Capacitación sobre indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS (2021)
Data: 25 nov. 2021
Aspectos destacados de las Capacitaciones sobre indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS (2021).
Grabación: https://youtu.be/-RDQDGTY5X4
Visite la página con toda la información y grabación:
https://lilacs.bvsalud.org/es/sesiones-virtuales-lilacs/indizacion-de-documentos-segun-la-metodologia-lilacs-2021/
Apoio a revisão da Base de Dados Moçambique Feedback Indexaçãohttp://bvsalud.org/
Acompanhamento do desenvolvimento e fortalecimento da BVS Moçambique - apresentação em 23/11/2021
Gravação: https://youtu.be/SWHVszRZffc
Apresentação: https://bit.ly/3xlwHgu - Revisão e correção de registros bibliográficos
Revisão e correção dos registros bibliográficos de Moçambique no sistema FI-A...http://bvsalud.org/
Cooperação entre Brasil e Moçambique
Metodologia LILACS e Procedimentos gerais para descrição bibliográfica
Gravação: https://youtu.be/SWHVszRZffc
Apresentação: https://bit.ly/3l5TJDg - Feedback sobre indexação (Lucilena)
(8 de 9) Indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS_2021: indizacio...http://bvsalud.org/
Indizacion de estudios sobre marcadores de enfermedades y Revisión de las respuestas de la Tarea 8. - Data: 28 de octubre 2021
Vea cómo utilizar los descriptores más adecuados para representar el contenido de las publicaciones registradas en las bases de datos en salud según la Metodologia LILACS
Grabación: https://youtu.be/FmZqjXc0vXE
Capacitación sobre indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS (2021)
Ponente: Nisbeth Jimenez
Directora de la Biblioteca Dr. Oswaldo Enríquez Isava. Facultad de Farmacia. Universidad Central de Venezuela
Revisión: Maria Regina Chiqueto / Carmen Oscarina Munoz / Maria Anália Conceição / Ana Lucia Vidili /Luci Bragion e Sueli Yano Suga
Documento analisado: Efecto del resveratrol sobre la pentraxina 3 sérica en la aterosclerosis. Pentraxina 3 como marcador de aterosclerosis
► Enlace del texto completo: http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_ff/article/view/17066
Visite la página con toda la información y grabación:
https://lilacs.bvsalud.org/es/sesiones-virtuales-lilacs/indizacion-de-documentos-segun-la-metodologia-lilacs-2021/
Sigue nuestro twitter:
https://twitter.com/redelilacs
(08|09) Buenas Prácticas Procesos Editoriales LILACS 2021 - PREPARACIÓN DE ED...http://bvsalud.org/
• Sesión 08 | 20 de octubre de 2021
• Tema: "PREPARACIÓN DE EDITORES: educación y profesionalización"
• Ponente: Drª Maria Helena Palucci Marziale
• Grabación: https://youtu.be/1sQvU68HKIY
Más informaciones → https://bit.ly/buenaspracticaslilacs2021
(7 de 9) Indización de documento según la Metodologia LILACS 2021: asociacio...http://bvsalud.org/
7 de 9 - Capacitación sobre indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS (2021)
Tema: Indización de estudios sobre asociación de enfermedades
Fecha: 23 de septiembre de 2021
Ponente: Adriana C.J Caamaño- Brasil
Revisión: Luci Bragion / Maria Analia / Ana Lucia Vidili e Sueli Yano Suga
Objetivo: Guía sobre el uso de descriptores más adecuados para representar el contenido de las publicaciones registradas en las bases de datos de las BVS y base de dados LILACS
01 ao 04 - Principios de la indización
05 ao 07 - Quiz
08 ao 10 - Presentación do documento a ser analizado
12 ao 24 - Paso a paso de la indización del documento
25 ao 27 - Tipos de Publicación y Tipos de Estudios
28 ao 28 - Vista previa de la indización
30 ao 39 - Definición de los calificadores indizados
40 ao 51 - Comentários sobre la indización de la tarea 7
52 ao 55 - Divulgación del proximo tema- tarea 8
Grabación: https://youtu.be/F7JFmHupFTs
Visite la página con toda la información y grabación:
https://lilacs.bvsalud.org/es/sesiones-virtuales-lilacs/indizacion-de-documentos-segun-la-metodologia-lilacs-2021/
(07|09) Buenas Prácticas Procesos Editoriales LILACS 2021 - DIRECTRICES PARA ...http://bvsalud.org/
• Sesión 07 | 15 de septiembre de 2021
• Tema: "Directrices para la revisión por pares"
• Ponente: Drª Leila Posenato Garcia
• Grabación: https://youtu.be/JmfEDXZ3uBk
Más informaciones → https://bit.ly/buenaspracticaslilacs2021
Capacitación sobre Metodología LILACS - Nicaragua_ 09 de sept. 2021http://bvsalud.org/
Capacitación sobre Metodología LILACS , para fortaler la red Nicaragua
Presentación: 09 de sept. 2021
Ponente: Sueli Suga
Grabación: https://youtu.be/w-8Ubz89kV4
(6 de 9) Indización de documento según la Metodología LILACS 2021: validación...http://bvsalud.org/
6 de 9 - Sesión virtual sobre indización de documentos según la Metodología LILACS 2021
Fecha: 26 de agosto de 2021
Ponente: Aldana Ljeschak Marino - Argentina
Revisión: Maria Analia / Ana Lucia Vidili e Sueli Yano Suga
Objetivo: Guía sobre el uso de descriptores más adecuados para representar el contenido de las publicaciones registradas en las bases de datos en salud.
03 ao 06 - Presentación DeCS/MeSH: cómo proceder en la indización
Presentación FI-Admin: cómo buscar los descriptores y calificadores
07 ao 09 - Quiz ¿De cualés secciones generalmente se extraen los tipos de publicación de un articulo de revista?
Respuesta correctas
10 ao 12 - Presentación del documento "validación de cuestionario"
13 ao 17 - Tipos de publicación
18 ao 26 - Descriptores Primarios
27 ao 31 - Descriptores Secundarios
32 ao 42 - Indización completa
43 y 44 - Divulgación de la proxima tarea
Grabación: https://youtu.be/i61mqay5DH0
Visite la página con toda la información y grabación:
https://lilacs.bvsalud.org/es/sesiones-virtuales-lilacs/indizacion-de-documentos-segun-la-metodologia-lilacs-2021/
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Reprodutibilidade em resultados de pesquisa (Olavo Bohrer Amaral)
1. Olavo B. Amaral
Reunião de Editores Científicos
CRICS10
Dezembro 2018
Research reproducibility
and scientific publication
2. • We are used to hearing that scientific articles are the most
reliable source of evidence to which we have access.
• That said, we have surprisingly little empirical evidence for
this claim.
An established paradigm
8. • 11 published studies:
- 4 mostly replicated
- 3 partially replicated
- 2 non-replicated
- 2 not interpretable
Some numbers
9. An empirical conclusion...
• In the few areas of biomedical science studied, we cannot
presume that most published findings are true.
10. The rotten apple fallacy
• Retractions for misconduct have become more common,
but their frequency does not begin to explain the problem.
11. The standardization fallacy
• An opposite approach is to try to explain irreproducibility by
purely methodological questions that can’t be controlled
across laboratories.
(that said...)
12. Hell is in the grey zone
• The most useful way to
approach irreproducibility
is to look at the grey zone
between methodological
diffficulties and
misconduct.
13. Chance and bias
• With loose statistical standards, the sum of our biases can
easily turn chance into scientific ‘truth’.
14. The tragedy of p < 0.05
• The definition of ‘significance’ used by most life scientists
means that, with enough data and ways to analyze it, one can
prove basically anything.
15. • With sufficient experiments, ‘significant’ results will occur in
1 out of 20 experiments by definition, even if nothing is true.
16. • Analyzing the same experiment in 20 different ways, it is
usually not hard to find a ‘significant’ result either.
18. A basic flaw
Replication
Citations
Impact
Changed plans
Data exploration
Analysis options
Obstacles
Negative results
Failed experiments
Criticism
• When reading a scientific article, we do not know the
original hypotheses, the number of comparisons and the
number of analysis options.
19. Like a Tinder profile
• This is not all that different from other ‘non-scientific’
syntheses of reality.
Replication
Citations
Impact
Changed plans
Data exploration
Analysis options
Obstacles
Negative results
Failed experiments
Criticism
20. Unmasking ‘impact’
• Traditional peer review conflates the evaluation of methods
and results (and of data and stories).
• Beautiful stories with lots of shaky data tend to trump solid,
well-performed experiments.
Volume
Novelty/Impact
- Number of
experiments,
methods, etc.
- Coherence of results
- Novelty of theory
- Potential impact
Rigor/Reproducibility
- Experimental design
- Protocol registration
- Data availability
- Statistical rigor
21. Doomed to fail
• Irreproducibility is the natural outcome in a system in which
impact and novelty count but truth does not.
22. Wrong time, wrong place
• Even when peer review does work, it comes at the wrong
time (after results are in) and behind closed doors.
Registered Reports
23. The death of prepublication peer review?
• It is time to discuss whether prepublication peer review
should not give way to different forms of quality control.
24. Time to experiment
• Do we lose that much by giving up on prepublication peer
review?
Score(%applicableitems)
bioRxiv PubMed
0
20
40
60
80
100
Quality of reporting of methods/results in
preprints vs. peer-reviewed articles
bioRxiv 59.4% vs. 63.9% PubMed
p = 0.019, r2 = 0.036
Carneiro et al., in prep.
https://osf.io/rxqn4/
25. Actual peer review
• We urgently need better data on reproducibility in various
scientific environments.
• 71 lab-strong initiative to reproduce 50-100 experiments from
Brazilian life sciences articles over the last 20 years.
• Each experiment reproduced in 3 labs to estimate interlab
variability.
• http://reprodutibilidade.bio.br
26. No need to fear change
• Unlike with democracy, we have not really tried out anything
different for the last century.
27. Barriers are cultural, not scientific
• Peer review has become more important for science as a form
of branding than of actual quality control.
28. Conclusions
• The current model of article peer review as a barrier to
publication based is more harmful than helpful for science.
• Changing the way we publish science to make it more
reproducible and accessible is an ethical imperative.
• These changes must be accompanied by changes in how we
evaluate science.
• The barriers to change are cultural rather than financial or
technological.
29. The tide is changing
• It is time to decide whether to cling to a sinking ship or to
help building new ones.
• http://asapbio.org