Analysis of chinese market in terms of building relationships, the importance of team work and building relationships in teams. Four dimensions of team work
The document discusses models of team development and dysfunctions that can inhibit teams. It describes Tuckman's stages of team development as forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It then explains Lencioni's five dysfunctions of a team as the absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Cohesive teams are said to trust each other, engage in open conflict, commit to decisions, hold each other accountable, and focus on results.
My presentation of P. Lencioni's book "Overcoming the 5 dysfunctions of a team", at the 34th Athens Agile meetup. The presentation includes the key points of the book, and in the addendum the Thomas-Kilmann model is explained.
The document outlines the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides suggestions for addressing each dysfunction and the role of the leader in fostering trust, encouraging productive conflict, ensuring commitment and buy-in to decisions, holding team members accountable, and focusing on results. High-functioning teams are characterized by trusting one another, engaging in unfiltered debates of ideas, committing to and following through on decisions, holding one another accountable, and prioritizing achievement of shared goals.
Endava Career Days Jan 2012 Five Dysfunctions of a TeamEndava
The document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model: (1) absence of trust, where team members are unwilling to be vulnerable within the group; (2) fear of conflict, where constructive ideological conflict is avoided; (3) lack of commitment, where team members do not buy into decisions and lack clarity around direction; (4) avoidance of accountability, where team members avoid calling out poor performance; and (5) inattention to results, where team members focus on personal goals over collective success. It provides explanations of each dysfunction and the role of the team leader in addressing them, as well as suggestions for overcoming the dysfunctions, such as using feedback surveys, setting clear
The document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model. The five dysfunctions are: 1) absence of trust, where team members are unwilling to be vulnerable; 2) fear of conflict, which prevents productive ideological debate; 3) lack of commitment, when teams fail to make definitive decisions in a timely manner; 4) avoidance of accountability, when teams avoid holding each other accountable for performance; and 5) inattention to results, when teams focus on individual goals rather than collective outcomes.
Team maturity - How to cultivate a team mentalityDeon Meyer
This is based on the book 5 Dysfunctions of a team by Patrick Lencioni. It's target audience is any person that fills a leadership role, be it on an executive level or not.
Danielle MacInnis is an experienced facilitator who runs teaming workshops. She draws on her experience in various roles to keep discussions focused on team goals and address unproductive behaviors. Common reasons teams fail include personal agendas taking priority over team effort and a lack of shared vision. Her workshops explore the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni: lack of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Activities are used to build trust and address each dysfunction.
The document discusses the 5 dysfunctions of a team: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Each dysfunction is defined by its symptoms and potential solution options are provided. The dysfunctions can prevent high performing teams if not addressed and their solutions aim to foster trust, encourage debate, gain clarity on goals, ensure accountability, and make goals team-centric rather than individual.
The document discusses models of team development and dysfunctions that can inhibit teams. It describes Tuckman's stages of team development as forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It then explains Lencioni's five dysfunctions of a team as the absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Cohesive teams are said to trust each other, engage in open conflict, commit to decisions, hold each other accountable, and focus on results.
My presentation of P. Lencioni's book "Overcoming the 5 dysfunctions of a team", at the 34th Athens Agile meetup. The presentation includes the key points of the book, and in the addendum the Thomas-Kilmann model is explained.
The document outlines the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides suggestions for addressing each dysfunction and the role of the leader in fostering trust, encouraging productive conflict, ensuring commitment and buy-in to decisions, holding team members accountable, and focusing on results. High-functioning teams are characterized by trusting one another, engaging in unfiltered debates of ideas, committing to and following through on decisions, holding one another accountable, and prioritizing achievement of shared goals.
Endava Career Days Jan 2012 Five Dysfunctions of a TeamEndava
The document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model: (1) absence of trust, where team members are unwilling to be vulnerable within the group; (2) fear of conflict, where constructive ideological conflict is avoided; (3) lack of commitment, where team members do not buy into decisions and lack clarity around direction; (4) avoidance of accountability, where team members avoid calling out poor performance; and (5) inattention to results, where team members focus on personal goals over collective success. It provides explanations of each dysfunction and the role of the team leader in addressing them, as well as suggestions for overcoming the dysfunctions, such as using feedback surveys, setting clear
The document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model. The five dysfunctions are: 1) absence of trust, where team members are unwilling to be vulnerable; 2) fear of conflict, which prevents productive ideological debate; 3) lack of commitment, when teams fail to make definitive decisions in a timely manner; 4) avoidance of accountability, when teams avoid holding each other accountable for performance; and 5) inattention to results, when teams focus on individual goals rather than collective outcomes.
Team maturity - How to cultivate a team mentalityDeon Meyer
This is based on the book 5 Dysfunctions of a team by Patrick Lencioni. It's target audience is any person that fills a leadership role, be it on an executive level or not.
Danielle MacInnis is an experienced facilitator who runs teaming workshops. She draws on her experience in various roles to keep discussions focused on team goals and address unproductive behaviors. Common reasons teams fail include personal agendas taking priority over team effort and a lack of shared vision. Her workshops explore the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni: lack of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Activities are used to build trust and address each dysfunction.
The document discusses the 5 dysfunctions of a team: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. Each dysfunction is defined by its symptoms and potential solution options are provided. The dysfunctions can prevent high performing teams if not addressed and their solutions aim to foster trust, encourage debate, gain clarity on goals, ensure accountability, and make goals team-centric rather than individual.
The 5 dysfunctions of a team Management Presentationrajopadhye
The document discusses Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides details on how each dysfunction negatively impacts a team and strategies that teams can use to overcome each dysfunction, such as conducting personality assessments, assigning roles to "mine for conflict," setting deadlines, and establishing clear goals and performance standards. Overcoming these dysfunctions helps teams make better decisions, hold members accountable, and achieve results.
The document discusses The Five Dysfunctions of a Team model by Patrick Lencioni. It outlines the five dysfunctions that prevent teams from being effective: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It encourages assessing teams using various methods to identify strengths and areas for improvement in overcoming these dysfunctions, particularly building vulnerability-based trust.
Teams that fear conflict tend to have boring meetings, ignore controversial topics, and fail to utilize all team perspectives. This wastes time and allows issues to go unresolved. Productive conflict is necessary for teams to grow and solve problems quickly. Teams that engage in conflict have lively discussions, extract ideas from all members, and minimize politics. The document provides techniques for making conflict more common and productive on teams, such as having members play the role of "miner of conflict" to extract disagreements. It also suggests providing "real time permission" to encourage healthy debates and prevent members from retreating from productive conflict.
Building Better Teams - Overcoming the 5 DysfunctionsJoel Wenger
Trust, Conflict, Commitment, Accountability, Results; these are the hallmarks of effective teams, as described by Patrick Lencioni in his book "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team". This presentation contains an overview of each one, as well as my take on the tools and actions leaders can take to address each one.
This was a talk given to the team at 5Q Communications in the Pecha Kucha format. It was given as part of a series of internal learning presentations. Enjoy!
This document summarizes Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team. It discusses that teams must build trust by being open about weaknesses, ask for help, and accept feedback. Without trust, teams fear conflict and fail to engage in passionate debate. As a result, teams lack commitment to decisions and avoid accountability. When accountability is lacking, teams become inattentive to results and focus on individual goals rather than collective success. The leader's role is to lead by example, protect the team, embrace conflict, generate commitment, and focus the team on results.
The document summarizes Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team which are: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides a brief description of each dysfunction and suggests using a questionnaire to help teams evaluate their susceptibility to these dysfunctions. It also includes a quote highlighting the importance of teamwork as a competitive advantage.
Institute of Design: Teaming Workshop By Chris BernardChris Bernard
This are slides for a Teaming Presentation and One Day workshop that I've taught at the Institute of Design on three occasions. I've included the slides in .PPT format which you may reference with proper accreditation. Note I've pulled some content and provided links to it to respect copyrights. Want me to conduct this workshop for you? Hire me! Email bernard@id.iit.edu for more information.
The document discusses the five dysfunctions of a team which are lack of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides information on each dysfunction and potential remedies which include establishing a baseline assessment, building trust, managing conflict, and contacting a coach. The overall message is that dismantling these five dysfunctions can transform a group of individuals into a high-performing team.
5 Dysfunctions of a DevOps Team - Velocity Ignite 2014 - ScriptRockCloudCheckr
DevOps is a human problem and a leadership problem. Building a DevOps culture requires more than giving developers root, installing a configuration management tool, using a source code repository, and proclaiming ‘yes, we’re a DevOps shop.” At the end of the day all aspects of the people, process, technology continuums get impacted by DevOps. Patrick Lencioni’s "Five Dysfunctions of a Team–A Leadership Fable" is an outstanding business book that uses a model of 5 dysfunctions of a team that affect team performance.
Patrick Lencioni’s "Five Dysfunctions of a Team–A Leadership Fable" is an outstanding business book that uses a model of 5 dysfunctions of a team that affect team performance. They are:
1. Absence of Trust
2. Fear of Conflict
3. Lack of Commitment
4. Avoidance of Accountability
5. Inattention to Results
The document outlines Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team:
1. Absence of trust - when team members are unwilling to be vulnerable within the team and show their weaknesses.
2. Fear of conflict - when team members avoid constructive tension and avoid difficult conversations that could lead to better solutions.
3. Lack of commitment - when team members do not buy into and support decisions made by the group.
4. Avoidance of accountability - when the team avoids holding its members accountable for their performance and behaviors.
5. Inattention to results - when the team focuses on internal issues rather than goals and achievements that benefit the customer. The five dysfunctions
The document provides guidance on how to effectively get and use feedback. It recommends asking for feedback from peers at a similar level and in small groups. It emphasizes focusing on reductive rather than additive feedback, and clarifying feedback with questions rather than arguing. The key rules outlined are to never argue, remember you want to know what's wrong, consider reductive feedback as usually correct, see additive feedback as potentially covering reductive issues, ask clarifying questions but not to argue, and get feedback from multiple sources.
This document discusses team building and the stages of team development. It defines key terms like team, teamwork, and team building. The stages of team building are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Effective teams have clear vision, shared commitment, clear roles, trust, and address challenges creatively. Ineffective teams lack clear mission and trust. Successful team building can coordinate efforts, leverage expertise, build motivation, and improve communication. Barriers to effective team communication include stress, different communication styles, lack of participation, and not listening.
Sports Studies - Session 3 - Sport In Action - Teamwork - WK11mjb87
This document discusses teamwork and effective teams. It covers several models and theories including Tuckman's four stages of team development (forming, storming, norming, performing), McGregor's 11 characteristics of effective teams, Lencioni's five dysfunctions of ineffective teams, and de Bono's six thinking hats method for effective meetings and decision making. The document also discusses social loafing in teams and characteristics of successful and unsuccessful teams. Students are asked to reflect on teams they have been part of and to negotiate with other groups to schedule presentations for an upcoming event without competing for dates.
Working the white space final [compatibility mode]carissabub1
This document discusses high-performing international teams and communication. It provides an agenda for a presentation on managing "white space," which refers to areas where responsibilities are unclear. The presentation will discuss relationship systems coaching and its perspective of seeing a team as a single dynamic entity. It will also cover meta-communication of teams, toxic team behaviors like blame and defensiveness, and antidotes to increase positivity. The goal is to improve team performance by managing white spaces and addressing issues like a lack of trust and misunderstandings.
This document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides guidance on how to build trust, engage in healthy conflict, achieve commitment, ensure accountability, and focus on results to create a highly functioning team.
The 5 Dysfunctions of a Progineering TeamSean Porter
The document discusses the 5 dysfunctions of an engineering team: 1) absence of trust due to bad attitudes and grudges, 2) fear of conflict where people don't voice disagreements, 3) lack of commitment seen in analysis paralysis and ambiguity, 4) avoidance of accountability when deadlines are missed, and 5) inattention to results where the product and team suffers. It provides examples of each dysfunction and recommends ways to fix them such as being vulnerable, respecting ideas over people, owning your product, defining standards, and focusing on results and rewards.
Organisational Behavior PPT Unit 3.pptxIrfaanMeera1
The document discusses Bruce Tuckman's five stages of group development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It then provides details about each stage, including that forming involves uncertainty, storming involves disputes, norming involves cooperation, performing involves high morale and focus on goals, and adjourning involves disengagement. The document also lists six advantages of group decision making, such as reducing risk and allowing input from varied expertise.
The document describes Karen Smith struggling to work effectively on a new product team due to personality conflicts. The team lacked clear leadership and was tasked with developing recommendations for a new retail product over several months. Karen faced difficulties getting along with teammate Ben, a male chauvinist. Ben and another teammate James often made decisions as a duo without considering others. The team spent most meetings discussing data rather than making decisions, slowing their progress. To improve the team's effectiveness, the document recommends assigning a disciplined, open-minded leader and having the team consider the Shea-Guzzo model of interdependence, sense of dependency, and outcome interdependence.
The 5 dysfunctions of a team Management Presentationrajopadhye
The document discusses Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides details on how each dysfunction negatively impacts a team and strategies that teams can use to overcome each dysfunction, such as conducting personality assessments, assigning roles to "mine for conflict," setting deadlines, and establishing clear goals and performance standards. Overcoming these dysfunctions helps teams make better decisions, hold members accountable, and achieve results.
The document discusses The Five Dysfunctions of a Team model by Patrick Lencioni. It outlines the five dysfunctions that prevent teams from being effective: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It encourages assessing teams using various methods to identify strengths and areas for improvement in overcoming these dysfunctions, particularly building vulnerability-based trust.
Teams that fear conflict tend to have boring meetings, ignore controversial topics, and fail to utilize all team perspectives. This wastes time and allows issues to go unresolved. Productive conflict is necessary for teams to grow and solve problems quickly. Teams that engage in conflict have lively discussions, extract ideas from all members, and minimize politics. The document provides techniques for making conflict more common and productive on teams, such as having members play the role of "miner of conflict" to extract disagreements. It also suggests providing "real time permission" to encourage healthy debates and prevent members from retreating from productive conflict.
Building Better Teams - Overcoming the 5 DysfunctionsJoel Wenger
Trust, Conflict, Commitment, Accountability, Results; these are the hallmarks of effective teams, as described by Patrick Lencioni in his book "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team". This presentation contains an overview of each one, as well as my take on the tools and actions leaders can take to address each one.
This was a talk given to the team at 5Q Communications in the Pecha Kucha format. It was given as part of a series of internal learning presentations. Enjoy!
This document summarizes Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team. It discusses that teams must build trust by being open about weaknesses, ask for help, and accept feedback. Without trust, teams fear conflict and fail to engage in passionate debate. As a result, teams lack commitment to decisions and avoid accountability. When accountability is lacking, teams become inattentive to results and focus on individual goals rather than collective success. The leader's role is to lead by example, protect the team, embrace conflict, generate commitment, and focus the team on results.
The document summarizes Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team which are: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides a brief description of each dysfunction and suggests using a questionnaire to help teams evaluate their susceptibility to these dysfunctions. It also includes a quote highlighting the importance of teamwork as a competitive advantage.
Institute of Design: Teaming Workshop By Chris BernardChris Bernard
This are slides for a Teaming Presentation and One Day workshop that I've taught at the Institute of Design on three occasions. I've included the slides in .PPT format which you may reference with proper accreditation. Note I've pulled some content and provided links to it to respect copyrights. Want me to conduct this workshop for you? Hire me! Email bernard@id.iit.edu for more information.
The document discusses the five dysfunctions of a team which are lack of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides information on each dysfunction and potential remedies which include establishing a baseline assessment, building trust, managing conflict, and contacting a coach. The overall message is that dismantling these five dysfunctions can transform a group of individuals into a high-performing team.
5 Dysfunctions of a DevOps Team - Velocity Ignite 2014 - ScriptRockCloudCheckr
DevOps is a human problem and a leadership problem. Building a DevOps culture requires more than giving developers root, installing a configuration management tool, using a source code repository, and proclaiming ‘yes, we’re a DevOps shop.” At the end of the day all aspects of the people, process, technology continuums get impacted by DevOps. Patrick Lencioni’s "Five Dysfunctions of a Team–A Leadership Fable" is an outstanding business book that uses a model of 5 dysfunctions of a team that affect team performance.
Patrick Lencioni’s "Five Dysfunctions of a Team–A Leadership Fable" is an outstanding business book that uses a model of 5 dysfunctions of a team that affect team performance. They are:
1. Absence of Trust
2. Fear of Conflict
3. Lack of Commitment
4. Avoidance of Accountability
5. Inattention to Results
The document outlines Patrick Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team:
1. Absence of trust - when team members are unwilling to be vulnerable within the team and show their weaknesses.
2. Fear of conflict - when team members avoid constructive tension and avoid difficult conversations that could lead to better solutions.
3. Lack of commitment - when team members do not buy into and support decisions made by the group.
4. Avoidance of accountability - when the team avoids holding its members accountable for their performance and behaviors.
5. Inattention to results - when the team focuses on internal issues rather than goals and achievements that benefit the customer. The five dysfunctions
The document provides guidance on how to effectively get and use feedback. It recommends asking for feedback from peers at a similar level and in small groups. It emphasizes focusing on reductive rather than additive feedback, and clarifying feedback with questions rather than arguing. The key rules outlined are to never argue, remember you want to know what's wrong, consider reductive feedback as usually correct, see additive feedback as potentially covering reductive issues, ask clarifying questions but not to argue, and get feedback from multiple sources.
This document discusses team building and the stages of team development. It defines key terms like team, teamwork, and team building. The stages of team building are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Effective teams have clear vision, shared commitment, clear roles, trust, and address challenges creatively. Ineffective teams lack clear mission and trust. Successful team building can coordinate efforts, leverage expertise, build motivation, and improve communication. Barriers to effective team communication include stress, different communication styles, lack of participation, and not listening.
Sports Studies - Session 3 - Sport In Action - Teamwork - WK11mjb87
This document discusses teamwork and effective teams. It covers several models and theories including Tuckman's four stages of team development (forming, storming, norming, performing), McGregor's 11 characteristics of effective teams, Lencioni's five dysfunctions of ineffective teams, and de Bono's six thinking hats method for effective meetings and decision making. The document also discusses social loafing in teams and characteristics of successful and unsuccessful teams. Students are asked to reflect on teams they have been part of and to negotiate with other groups to schedule presentations for an upcoming event without competing for dates.
Working the white space final [compatibility mode]carissabub1
This document discusses high-performing international teams and communication. It provides an agenda for a presentation on managing "white space," which refers to areas where responsibilities are unclear. The presentation will discuss relationship systems coaching and its perspective of seeing a team as a single dynamic entity. It will also cover meta-communication of teams, toxic team behaviors like blame and defensiveness, and antidotes to increase positivity. The goal is to improve team performance by managing white spaces and addressing issues like a lack of trust and misunderstandings.
This document summarizes the five dysfunctions of a team according to Patrick Lencioni's model: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It provides guidance on how to build trust, engage in healthy conflict, achieve commitment, ensure accountability, and focus on results to create a highly functioning team.
The 5 Dysfunctions of a Progineering TeamSean Porter
The document discusses the 5 dysfunctions of an engineering team: 1) absence of trust due to bad attitudes and grudges, 2) fear of conflict where people don't voice disagreements, 3) lack of commitment seen in analysis paralysis and ambiguity, 4) avoidance of accountability when deadlines are missed, and 5) inattention to results where the product and team suffers. It provides examples of each dysfunction and recommends ways to fix them such as being vulnerable, respecting ideas over people, owning your product, defining standards, and focusing on results and rewards.
Organisational Behavior PPT Unit 3.pptxIrfaanMeera1
The document discusses Bruce Tuckman's five stages of group development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It then provides details about each stage, including that forming involves uncertainty, storming involves disputes, norming involves cooperation, performing involves high morale and focus on goals, and adjourning involves disengagement. The document also lists six advantages of group decision making, such as reducing risk and allowing input from varied expertise.
The document describes Karen Smith struggling to work effectively on a new product team due to personality conflicts. The team lacked clear leadership and was tasked with developing recommendations for a new retail product over several months. Karen faced difficulties getting along with teammate Ben, a male chauvinist. Ben and another teammate James often made decisions as a duo without considering others. The team spent most meetings discussing data rather than making decisions, slowing their progress. To improve the team's effectiveness, the document recommends assigning a disciplined, open-minded leader and having the team consider the Shea-Guzzo model of interdependence, sense of dependency, and outcome interdependence.
Define and describe the facilitator’s role and responsibilities on a team. Define and apply various tools used with teams, including brainstorming, nominal group technique, conflict resolution, force-field analysis, etc.
The #DROOS_FLGAWDA channel is dedicated to providing scientific content that effectively contributes to building knowledge among interested and quality workers as well as manufacturers and service providers so that they can achieve their products better, faster and at the lowest cost.
Simply channel #DROOS_FLGAWDA... will change your life for the better
JOIN-US FOR FREE
https://goo.gl/4S8PQ8
The document discusses the five dysfunctions of a team according to Lencioni's model: absence of trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results. It describes each dysfunction, symptoms that indicate its presence on a team, and how addressing each dysfunction from the bottom up is important for team success. For example, it states that trust is needed for healthy conflict, which leads to commitment from team members and accountability to results.
This document provides an overview of teamwork and team building. It discusses the forming, storming, norming, and performing stages of team development. It also describes different types of teams like traditional teams, self-directed teams, and e-teams. The document outlines the key aspects of effective team meetings, problem solving as a team through brainstorming and building consensus, and techniques for encouraging teamwork like team-building activities. The overall purpose is to explore different aspects of teams and how to become an effective team member.
H I G H P E R F O R M A N C E L E A D E R S H I P P R E S E N T A T I O Nmumbaiachievers
This document provides a summary of a presentation on teamwork and team building. It discusses key skills needed for teamwork like listening, sharing, hard work, and communication. It outlines the stages of team development from forming to storming to norming to performing. It also discusses roles for successful teams, features affecting team building, and steps to take in team building like planning goals, choosing team members, and measuring results. The document aims to provide guidance on building high-performing teams.
A team supports an environment that lets team members flourish, meaning there is open communication, no games or hidden agendas, no schmoozing the team leader, transparency, and motivated team members who want to struggle together to achieve goals.
A group is comprised of individuals who meet to discuss issues, problem solve, or to inform. A real team, however, is defined as people coming together for a common purpose, setting clear goals, and establishing priorities. The team leader and team members define roles for individual members, utilizing individual strengths and nurturing synergism (working together) to create a unified plan of action in order to achieve identified and measured results. Team members learn to depend and rely on other team members to demonstrate their talents and support the team.
EFFECTIVE SKILLS FOR TEAM BUILDING
Group Agreements
Learning Objectives
Definition
Resistance to Teams in Organizations
Team Development, Behaviors and Performance
Effective and Ineffective Teams
Team Decision Making and Consensus Building
Questions and Comments
Today’s Agenda
ALL IDEAS AND POINTS OF VIEW HAVE VALUE
You may hear something you do not agree with or you think is "silly" or "wrong." Please remember that one of the goals of this meeting is to share ideas. All ideas have value in this setting. Also share YOUR ideas and thoughts and avoid editorials of another colleague’s comments.
SAFE SPACE
What is shared and discussed with one another should “stay here” – apart from ideas and solutions that will help your own work and agency.
USE COMMON CONVERSATIONAL COURTESY
Please don't interrupt; use appropriate language, avoid third party/ side bar discussions, etc.
Group Agreements
HUMOR IS WELCOME
BUT humor should never be at someone else's expense.
HONOR TIME
We have an ambitious agenda, so it will be important to follow the time guidelines for the next two days.
CELL PHONE / TEXTING / E-MAIL COURTESY
Please turn cell phones, or any other communication item with an on/off switch to “silent. If you need to respond, kindly step outside
BE COMFORTABLE
Please feel free to take personal breaks as needed
ANY OTHERS AGREEMENTS TO ADD?
Group Agreements
To gain a greater understanding of how teams develop, behave and perform.To utilize this knowledge to develop high performing teams in centers and programs.
Learning Objective
TEAM BUILDING
Group: A collection of two or more interacting individuals with a stable pattern of relationships among them, who share common goals and who perceive themselves as being a group.
Essentials of a groupSocial interactionStable structureCommon interestsPerceive themselves as part of group
Team: A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.
This definition highlights the essentials of a team or in other words the team basics. Here the focus or emphasis is on three characteristics – small number, complementary skills and commitment. These are what basically differentiates a team from a group and makes a team something much more productive and result oriented than a group. We shall analyze them:Small number – five to ten peopleComplementary skills – appropriate balance or mix of skills and traitsCommitment to a common purpose and performance goals – specific performance goals are an integral part of the purpose.Commitment to a common approach – team members must agree on who will do a particular job & develop a common approach.Mutual accountability – at its core, team accountability is about the sincere promises we make to others & ourselves – commitment & trust.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GROUP AND TEAM
GROUPStrong, clearly focus ...
This document discusses various topics related to developing effective teams such as types of teams, team building, team roles and dynamics, team performance tools, and creating an action plan. It defines what a team is and describes different types of teams. It outlines the forming, storming, norming, and performing stages of team development. It presents Parker's 12 characteristics of effective teams and describes factors that shape team performance like internal/external focus and change. It also addresses topics like creativity, conflict management, problem solving, and creating a team improvement action plan.
From dysfunction to cohesion for results.Lucy Barkas
The document discusses the importance of teamwork and effective teams. It describes how cohesive teams make better decisions, tap into all members' skills and opinions, avoid politics and conflict, and focus on results. In contrast, dysfunctional teams limit debate, avoid sharing information, and waste time on hidden agendas. The document then outlines the five behaviors of effective teams according to Patrick Lencioni's model: trust, conflict, commitment, accountability, and results. Building these behaviors can help teams achieve their goals through improved decision making and a cooperative environment.
This document discusses different techniques for facilitating group discussions, including focus groups and the nominal group technique. It provides details on how to plan and conduct focus groups, including developing questions, scheduling, and recording the discussion. The advantages of focus groups include speed, transparency, and the ability to observe interactions, but disadvantages include difficulties coordinating schedules and dominant personalities. The nominal group technique is also reviewed, which involves individuals privately writing ideas that are then discussed and ranked by the group.
The document discusses different forms of group communication used in organizations. It describes meetings, seminars, group discussions, and other forms where members communicate to share information, make decisions, solve problems, and discuss topics. It provides details on techniques like brainstorming, nominal group technique, and Delphi technique that organizations use for group decision making. It also explains how group discussions are an important part of selection processes to evaluate candidates' skills, knowledge, and ability to work in a team.
The document discusses Bruce Tuckman's model of group development, which outlines 5 typical stages that groups progress through: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It describes the key characteristics of each stage in terms of personal relations and task functions. The stages are sequential and developmental - groups must resolve issues at each stage before progressing to the next. The model can help facilitators understand a group's needs at different stages and plan interventions accordingly to support effective group communication and development.
Organisational Behavior PPT Unit 3.pdfIrfaanMeera1
This document discusses group dynamics and the stages of group development. It describes the 5 stages of group development established by Bruce Tuckman in 1965: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each stage is defined in 1-2 sentences. The document also lists 6 advantages of group decision making, including benefiting from collective expertise, creating acceptance for outcomes, and reducing risk for individuals.
Presentation on internship carried out in charter airline service in Nigeria called Dornier Aviation Nigeria AIEP. Maintenance and Repairs to the 5N-BUN Aircraft
This document presents information about Twitter Inc. in 2018. It discusses Twitter's history, starting as a podcast company called Odeo that transitioned to Twitter when it was launched in 2006. It provides an overview of Twitter as a social media company that generates revenue from advertisements and data sales. It also shows Twitter's financial performance from 2014 to 2018, with revenue growing each year. The document addresses Twitter's competitors and asks questions about topics like its financial position and how it compares to Facebook and Snap.
Presentation of the strategy and analysis of TOMS Shoes. It studies how they gain competitive advantage, how they sustain it and the need for corporate social responsibility
A presentation of my final year project,which was the development and fabrication of a 50kg capacity DC electrical shopping cart for use in stores and load carrying applications.
The document summarizes a renovation project for a Family Dollar store. The project managers are Babafemi Ekundayo and Harrison Zachary. They assembled a team of 20 associates to complete deliverables like new fridges, shopping carts, decorations, and cigarette shelves. The project aims to improve customer service and upgrade equipment. It has a schedule spanning 10 days from March 3 to 12 and an estimated total cost of $71,344.25. Risks are mitigated through quality control checks and a change management process. Lessons learned include benefits of proper planning and risks of delays and large team sizes. The summary concludes the project was successfully completed and improved customer satisfaction.
The document proposes strategies for the Outlaws softball team to achieve their goals of providing scholarships, maintaining community parks, and growing their organization. These include selling food and merchandise at live events; streaming events online and charging a fee; using an interactive scoreboard to display fundraising goals; expanding use of social media, websites, and apps like TikTok; and creating competitions between nonprofit softball teams to draw larger audiences. The strategies aim to help the Outlaws scale up their operations through increased community engagement, fundraising, and growth into a national and international nonprofit league.
This document presents 10 logo concepts and 2 gif concepts for a group called The Outlaws, along with descriptions of how the final concept could be used on merchandise, advertisements, and calendars. It explores single logo designs as well as a group concept, with the goal of selecting a final logo and identity for The Outlaws brand.
The Dabbawalla supply chain in Mumbai, India efficiently delivers home-cooked meals to workers. Over 5,000 Dabbawallas use color-coded boxes, bicycles, and trains to sort and deliver 200,000 dabbas daily with an extremely low error rate of around 1 in 16 million deliveries. The Dabbawallas have developed a simple yet highly effective system based on cultural traditions, strict adherence to processes, and low costs that serves as a model of supply chain efficiency.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
7. GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF A TEAM IN WHICH YOU
WORKED. WHICH QUADRANT WOULD YOU SAY
WAS MOST FITTING OF THE PATTERNS OF THE
TEAM? DESCRIBE.
The team I am describing is the team I am currently on this global
project management course
We fall under,
Fourth
Quadrant
8. TRAITS OF THE TEAM
The team falls under the perverse fourth quadrant since
Group Consensus as oppose to the analytical exploration of every idea put
forward is used to
make decisions within the group which is dysfunctional approach to
decision making.
This was exhibited in the choice of idea to move forward with, numerous
ideas were put forward by a member and they were not considered.
Lack of consideration results in Isolation within the team
9. TRAITS OF THE TEAM
The team falls under the perverse fourth quadrant since
There is a Domineering Party within the group who organizes
specialized meetings to which some members of the group are left
out.
This was exhibited in the trust building exercise where all the members of
the team did not know that the meeting had already occurred and were left
standing not being able to oppose whatever resolution was made in their
absence.
Coercion and Threat is used to obtain agreement instead of formal open
group discussion
10. TRAITS OF THE TEAM
The team falls under the perverse fourth quadrant since
The team waits until deadline to start addressing important issues as
reflected again in the trust building exercise.
This again was exhibited in the trust building exercise, in which not all
members knew of the team building exercise for the week and could not
contribute to forming a Unilateral Solution which incorporates the best
everyone's views.
11. TRAITS OF THE TEAM
The team falls under the perverse fourth quadrant since
Hardly any room for debate and some members just take the path of
least resistance
This was exhibited in project selections, as oppose to every member
bringing in their idea, other just piggybacked on whatever was available.
12. TRAITS OF THE TEAM
The team falls under the perverse fourth quadrant since
The lack of participation results in Insufficient Labor to do the task
required and excessive strain on those doing the task.
When the Strain is High, results will typically come in very late as reflected in
the 15 minutes to class decision making for the trust building exercise.