CITOOLKIT
Prioritization Matrix
Putting Prioritization Matrix into Practice for Effective Decision-Making
citoolkit.com
Introduction
Many real-life decision-making situations have several conflicting criteria
that need to be considered at the same time.
Traditionally, this is often carried out by applying trial-and-error methods, or
by relying on the experience of people.
Prioritization Matrix 2
citoolkit.com
Introduction
In such situations, decision makers are required to use
prioritization in order to make effective decisions.
Prioritization is an essential skill that needs to be
mastered by professionals to make the best use of
their own and their team’s time and effort.
Prioritization Matrix 3
citoolkit.com
Prioritization
Prioritization allows to select the most appropriate alternative after
evaluating multiple conflicting criteria as part of the decision-making
process.
Prioritization Matrix 4
citoolkit.com
Prioritization
Prioritization allows to determine the best feasible option according to
predefined criteria.
Prioritization Matrix 5
Helps selecting items to be
actioned from a list of
possible alternatives
OPTIONS
1
3
2
4
citoolkit.com
Prioritization Matrix
A prioritization matrix provides a way to prioritize a list of items into an
order of importance for decision making.
Prioritization Matrix 6
This provides a
foundation for sorting
and selecting the items
and helps in the overall
evaluation
citoolkit.com
Applications of Prioritization Matrix
Prioritization Matrix 7
Often used in project
management to select the
potential projects that need to
be initiated
Can be used when you need to
prioritize customer needs
based on what customers say
is important
“
“
citoolkit.com
Applications of Prioritization Matrix
Other applications . . .
Vendor and
supplier selection
Material and
service selection
Personnel selection
System and
software selection
Equipment and
machine selection
Prioritization Matrix 8
citoolkit.com
Problem-Solving and Process Improvement
Used in problems solving and process improvement to:
• Select the problem that needs to be resolved before
initiation.
• Then, select the solution that needs to be
implemented after analysis.
Prioritization Matrix 9
citoolkit.com
Benefits
Prioritization Matrix 10
Helps reducing options to the most
effective and least costly.
Allows the team to agree on priorities
and move toward the action
collectively.
Helps making more informed and
justifiable decisions.
Helps making use of time and
resources to focus on the things that
really matter.
citoolkit.com
Prioritization Matrix Components
Are comprised of four components . . .
Prioritization Matrix 11
Problem /
Objective
Alternatives /
Options
Decision Makers
and their
Preferences
Evaluation Criteria
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Represent defined standards by which the different alternatives can be
measured and compared.
Provide an objective and consistent basis for comparison.
Prioritization Matrix 12
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Examples of evaluation criteria for selecting projects . . .
Prioritization Matrix 13
Risks
Costs
Benefits
Time
What
else
?
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Examples of evaluation criteria when hiring a new employee . . .
Prioritization Matrix 14
Experience
Skills
Attitude
Availability
What
else
?
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Examples of evaluation criteria when buying a new car . . .
Prioritization Matrix 15
Cost
Safety
Comfort
Performance
What
else
?
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
How to Develop Evaluation Criteria?
Conduct an evaluation criteria development session.
Prioritization Matrix 16
Generate ideas
(Brainstorming)
Reduce Ideas
(Voting)
Organize Ideas
(Affinity)
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Prioritization Matrix 17
Should be relevant to the situation
Should be easily measured
Should be useful for the evaluation
citoolkit.com
Evaluation Criteria
Questions that may help develop your evaluation criteria . .
Prioritization Matrix 18
Will it improve customer satisfaction?
Will the solution solve the problem permanently?
What are the cost for implementing the solution?
How much time it will take?
How easy is it to implement?
Are there any potential problems or risks that can arise in future?
Are there any potential regulatory issues that need to be considered?
citoolkit.com
Weighting Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation criteria can be weighed according to
their relative importance based on the preferences
of the team.
Prioritization Matrix 19
For example, when hiring a new employee,
skills may weigh less than the experience,
because it considered by the recruitment
team to be less important.
citoolkit.com
Weighting Evaluation Criteria
How to Weight Evaluation Criteria?
Prioritization Matrix 20
The simplest way to weight the evaluation criteria is by allowing the team
members to distribute a certain number of points (say 100) between the
selected criteria. Scores for each criterion are then multiplied with their
weights
citoolkit.com
Weighting Evaluation Criteria Example
Selecting New Equipment
Ask each team member to distribute 100 points between the selected criteria.
Prioritization Matrix 21
Criteria Adam Emir Sara Zekaria Total
Cost effective 40 10 20 15 85
Decreased defects 15 20 30 15 80
Increased productivity 40 55 50 30 175
User friendly 5 15 0 40 60
100 100 100 100
citoolkit.com
Templates
Simple Prioritization Matrix Template
Prioritization Matrix 22
Scores Rank
CRITERIA
OPTIONS
citoolkit.com
Templates
Simple Prioritization Matrix Template
Prioritization Matrix 23
Scores
Rank
OPTIONS
CRITERIA Rotated
Version
citoolkit.com
Templates
Simple Prioritization Matrix Template – The Two Versions
Prioritization Matrix 24
Scores
Rank
Scores Rank
Criteria
Options
Options
Criteria
citoolkit.com
Templates
Prioritization Matrix Template (Including Weighting)
Prioritization Matrix 25
Criteria
Weighted
scores Rank
 Options / Weight →
citoolkit.com
Templates
Prioritization Matrix Template (Including Weighting)
Prioritization Matrix 26
Options
Criteria Weight
Weighted scores
Rank
Rotated
Version
citoolkit.com
Templates
Prioritization Matrix Template (Including Weighting) – The Two Versions
Prioritization Matrix 27
Options
Criteria Weight
Weighted scores
Rank
Criteria
Scores Rank
Weight →
 Options
citoolkit.com
Example
Selecting New Equipment (no weighting is used).
Prioritization Matrix 28
Cost
effective
Decreased
defects
Increased
productivity
User
friendly
Scores Rank
New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 10 2
New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 12 1
New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 9 3
New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 7 4
CRITERIA
OPTIONS
citoolkit.com
Example
Selecting New Equipment (same weighting is used for all).
Prioritization Matrix 29
Criteria
Cost
effective
Decreased
defects
Increased
productivity
User
friendly
Weighted
scores Rank
 Options / Weight → 1 1 1 1
New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 10 2
New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 12 1
New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 9 3
New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 7 4
citoolkit.com
Example
Selecting New Equipment (different weighting is used).
Prioritization Matrix 30
Criteria
Cost
effective
Decreased
defects
Increased
productivity
User
friendly Weighted
scores Rank
 Options / Weight → 0.85 0.8 1.75 0.6
New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 9.45 3
New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 11.75 1
New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 10.65 2
New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 6.55 4
Criteria Adam Emir Sara Zekaria Total
Cost effective 40 10 20 15 85
Decreased defects 15 20 30 15 80
Increased productivity 40 55 50 30 175
User friendly 5 15 40 60
100 100 100 100
Scores for each
criterion are
multiplied with
their weights
You may express
weights as a
whole number,
decimal or
percentage
citoolkit.com
Steps for Conducting a Prioritization Exercise
Prioritization Matrix 31
Explain the purpose for constructing the prioritization matrix
• Identify and agree on the alternatives that need to be prioritized.
1
2
3
Alternatives
citoolkit.com
Steps for Conducting a Prioritization Exercise
//
Prioritization Matrix 32
Select the evaluation criteria and their weights
• Ensure that the evaluation criteria and their weights are agreed by all.
1 2 3
1
2
3
Criteria
citoolkit.com
Steps for Conducting a Prioritization Exercise
Prioritization Matrix 33
Guide the team in ranking alternatives based on each criterion, from best to worst
• The best will have the highest rank score (e.g., 5 out of 5 alternatives).
1 2 3
1
2
3
1 2 3
1
2
3
1 2 3
1
2
3
citoolkit.com
Steps for Conducting a Prioritization Exercise
Prioritization Matrix 34
Collect the team’s rank scores, average and add them up on one worksheet
• The general preference score is the weighted average of all criteria.
1 2 3
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
1
2
3
citoolkit.com
Steps for Conducting a Prioritization Exercise
Prioritization Matrix 35
Calculate the final weighted scores for each alternative
• Sort the items by their ranks to make them clearer for communication and
decision making.
1 2 3
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
1
2
3
..
..
..
..
..
..
Scores Rank
citoolkit.com
Example
Select the most efficient data collection method.
Prioritization Matrix 36
Criteria Cost
Response
time
Quantity
Weighted
scores Rank
 Option / Weight → 0.4 0.2 0.3
Questionnaire 4 1 4 4.8 1
Interview 2 4 1 4.3 2
Observation 3 2 3 3.7 3
Focus group 1 3 2 2.2 4
Note: High score of cost doesn’t mean that the cost is high, but low (or cost-effective)
citoolkit.com
Graphical Representation
The outcome of the analysis can be presented using a bar chart to see
which alternative is the most suitable based on the scores of the team.
Scores
Alternatives
Prioritization Matrix 37
citoolkit.com
Example
Select the most efficient data collection method.
Prioritization Matrix 38
Criteria Cost
Response
time
Quantity
Weighted
scores Rank
 Option / Weight → 0.4 0.2 0.3
Questionnaire 4 1 4 4.8 1
Interview 2 4 1 4.3 2
Observation 3 2 3 3.7 3
Focus group 1 3 2 2.2 4
An ordered bar chart that
represents the results
Questionnaire Interview Observation Focus group
citoolkit.com
Example – Project Selection
A manufacturing company needs to select two projects to be implemented
this year. Consider the following project alternatives and criteria . . .
Prioritization Matrix 39
Cost $
Savings $ 1st
year (X3)
Months to
complete
Energy reduction $36,000 $43,000 10
Spoilage reduction $30,000 $120,000 12
Reduce strap width $5,500 $11,000 3
Reduce stretch wrap usage $7,000 $4,000 5
Reduce over varnish usage $20,000 $66,000 8
citoolkit.com
Example – Project Selection
It was agreed that savings should be given a weight of 3 as it is relatively
more important than the other two criteria.
Prioritization Matrix 40
Criteria Cost $
Savings $
(1st year)
Months to
complete Weighted
scores Rank
 Option / Weight → 1 3 1
Energy reduction 1 3X3= 9 2 12 4th
Spoilage reduction 2 5X3 = 15 1 18 1st
Reduce strap width 5 2X3 = 6 5 16 3rd
Reduce stretch wrap usage 4 1X3 = 3 4 11 5th
Reduce over varnish usage 3 4X3 = 12 3 18 1st
citoolkit.com
Four Field Prioritization Matrix
If there are only two evaluation criteria, the alternatives can be presented in
a four-field matrix.
Prioritization Matrix 41
A four-field
matrix
citoolkit.com
Four Field Prioritization Matrix – Example
Prioritization Matrix 42
Consider Later
Never Do
Do First
Consider Later
+
COMPLETION
TIME
–
+ COST –
Reduce
energy
usage
Reduce spoilage
Reduce strap width
Reduce stretch
wrap usage
Reduce over
varnish usage
citoolkit.com
Further Information
It is important to include people with enough knowledge of the situation to
avoid missing any critical point.
Prioritization Matrix 43
© Copyright Citoolkit.com. All Rights Reserved.
CITOOLKIT
Made with by
The Continuous Improvement Toolkit
www.citoolkit.com

Putting Prioritization Matrix into Practice for Effective Decision-Making

  • 1.
    CITOOLKIT Prioritization Matrix Putting PrioritizationMatrix into Practice for Effective Decision-Making
  • 2.
    citoolkit.com Introduction Many real-life decision-makingsituations have several conflicting criteria that need to be considered at the same time. Traditionally, this is often carried out by applying trial-and-error methods, or by relying on the experience of people. Prioritization Matrix 2
  • 3.
    citoolkit.com Introduction In such situations,decision makers are required to use prioritization in order to make effective decisions. Prioritization is an essential skill that needs to be mastered by professionals to make the best use of their own and their team’s time and effort. Prioritization Matrix 3
  • 4.
    citoolkit.com Prioritization Prioritization allows toselect the most appropriate alternative after evaluating multiple conflicting criteria as part of the decision-making process. Prioritization Matrix 4
  • 5.
    citoolkit.com Prioritization Prioritization allows todetermine the best feasible option according to predefined criteria. Prioritization Matrix 5 Helps selecting items to be actioned from a list of possible alternatives OPTIONS 1 3 2 4
  • 6.
    citoolkit.com Prioritization Matrix A prioritizationmatrix provides a way to prioritize a list of items into an order of importance for decision making. Prioritization Matrix 6 This provides a foundation for sorting and selecting the items and helps in the overall evaluation
  • 7.
    citoolkit.com Applications of PrioritizationMatrix Prioritization Matrix 7 Often used in project management to select the potential projects that need to be initiated Can be used when you need to prioritize customer needs based on what customers say is important “ “
  • 8.
    citoolkit.com Applications of PrioritizationMatrix Other applications . . . Vendor and supplier selection Material and service selection Personnel selection System and software selection Equipment and machine selection Prioritization Matrix 8
  • 9.
    citoolkit.com Problem-Solving and ProcessImprovement Used in problems solving and process improvement to: • Select the problem that needs to be resolved before initiation. • Then, select the solution that needs to be implemented after analysis. Prioritization Matrix 9
  • 10.
    citoolkit.com Benefits Prioritization Matrix 10 Helpsreducing options to the most effective and least costly. Allows the team to agree on priorities and move toward the action collectively. Helps making more informed and justifiable decisions. Helps making use of time and resources to focus on the things that really matter.
  • 11.
    citoolkit.com Prioritization Matrix Components Arecomprised of four components . . . Prioritization Matrix 11 Problem / Objective Alternatives / Options Decision Makers and their Preferences Evaluation Criteria
  • 12.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Represent definedstandards by which the different alternatives can be measured and compared. Provide an objective and consistent basis for comparison. Prioritization Matrix 12
  • 13.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Examples ofevaluation criteria for selecting projects . . . Prioritization Matrix 13 Risks Costs Benefits Time What else ?
  • 14.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Examples ofevaluation criteria when hiring a new employee . . . Prioritization Matrix 14 Experience Skills Attitude Availability What else ?
  • 15.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Examples ofevaluation criteria when buying a new car . . . Prioritization Matrix 15 Cost Safety Comfort Performance What else ?
  • 16.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria How toDevelop Evaluation Criteria? Conduct an evaluation criteria development session. Prioritization Matrix 16 Generate ideas (Brainstorming) Reduce Ideas (Voting) Organize Ideas (Affinity)
  • 17.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Prioritization Matrix17 Should be relevant to the situation Should be easily measured Should be useful for the evaluation
  • 18.
    citoolkit.com Evaluation Criteria Questions thatmay help develop your evaluation criteria . . Prioritization Matrix 18 Will it improve customer satisfaction? Will the solution solve the problem permanently? What are the cost for implementing the solution? How much time it will take? How easy is it to implement? Are there any potential problems or risks that can arise in future? Are there any potential regulatory issues that need to be considered?
  • 19.
    citoolkit.com Weighting Evaluation Criteria Theevaluation criteria can be weighed according to their relative importance based on the preferences of the team. Prioritization Matrix 19 For example, when hiring a new employee, skills may weigh less than the experience, because it considered by the recruitment team to be less important.
  • 20.
    citoolkit.com Weighting Evaluation Criteria Howto Weight Evaluation Criteria? Prioritization Matrix 20 The simplest way to weight the evaluation criteria is by allowing the team members to distribute a certain number of points (say 100) between the selected criteria. Scores for each criterion are then multiplied with their weights
  • 21.
    citoolkit.com Weighting Evaluation CriteriaExample Selecting New Equipment Ask each team member to distribute 100 points between the selected criteria. Prioritization Matrix 21 Criteria Adam Emir Sara Zekaria Total Cost effective 40 10 20 15 85 Decreased defects 15 20 30 15 80 Increased productivity 40 55 50 30 175 User friendly 5 15 0 40 60 100 100 100 100
  • 22.
    citoolkit.com Templates Simple Prioritization MatrixTemplate Prioritization Matrix 22 Scores Rank CRITERIA OPTIONS
  • 23.
    citoolkit.com Templates Simple Prioritization MatrixTemplate Prioritization Matrix 23 Scores Rank OPTIONS CRITERIA Rotated Version
  • 24.
    citoolkit.com Templates Simple Prioritization MatrixTemplate – The Two Versions Prioritization Matrix 24 Scores Rank Scores Rank Criteria Options Options Criteria
  • 25.
    citoolkit.com Templates Prioritization Matrix Template(Including Weighting) Prioritization Matrix 25 Criteria Weighted scores Rank  Options / Weight →
  • 26.
    citoolkit.com Templates Prioritization Matrix Template(Including Weighting) Prioritization Matrix 26 Options Criteria Weight Weighted scores Rank Rotated Version
  • 27.
    citoolkit.com Templates Prioritization Matrix Template(Including Weighting) – The Two Versions Prioritization Matrix 27 Options Criteria Weight Weighted scores Rank Criteria Scores Rank Weight →  Options
  • 28.
    citoolkit.com Example Selecting New Equipment(no weighting is used). Prioritization Matrix 28 Cost effective Decreased defects Increased productivity User friendly Scores Rank New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 10 2 New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 12 1 New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 9 3 New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 7 4 CRITERIA OPTIONS
  • 29.
    citoolkit.com Example Selecting New Equipment(same weighting is used for all). Prioritization Matrix 29 Criteria Cost effective Decreased defects Increased productivity User friendly Weighted scores Rank  Options / Weight → 1 1 1 1 New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 10 2 New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 12 1 New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 9 3 New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 7 4
  • 30.
    citoolkit.com Example Selecting New Equipment(different weighting is used). Prioritization Matrix 30 Criteria Cost effective Decreased defects Increased productivity User friendly Weighted scores Rank  Options / Weight → 0.85 0.8 1.75 0.6 New equipment 1 3 2 2 3 9.45 3 New equipment 2 2 3 3 4 11.75 1 New equipment 3 1 2 4 2 10.65 2 New equipment 4 4 1 1 1 6.55 4 Criteria Adam Emir Sara Zekaria Total Cost effective 40 10 20 15 85 Decreased defects 15 20 30 15 80 Increased productivity 40 55 50 30 175 User friendly 5 15 40 60 100 100 100 100 Scores for each criterion are multiplied with their weights You may express weights as a whole number, decimal or percentage
  • 31.
    citoolkit.com Steps for Conductinga Prioritization Exercise Prioritization Matrix 31 Explain the purpose for constructing the prioritization matrix • Identify and agree on the alternatives that need to be prioritized. 1 2 3 Alternatives
  • 32.
    citoolkit.com Steps for Conductinga Prioritization Exercise // Prioritization Matrix 32 Select the evaluation criteria and their weights • Ensure that the evaluation criteria and their weights are agreed by all. 1 2 3 1 2 3 Criteria
  • 33.
    citoolkit.com Steps for Conductinga Prioritization Exercise Prioritization Matrix 33 Guide the team in ranking alternatives based on each criterion, from best to worst • The best will have the highest rank score (e.g., 5 out of 5 alternatives). 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
  • 34.
    citoolkit.com Steps for Conductinga Prioritization Exercise Prioritization Matrix 34 Collect the team’s rank scores, average and add them up on one worksheet • The general preference score is the weighted average of all criteria. 1 2 3 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 2 3
  • 35.
    citoolkit.com Steps for Conductinga Prioritization Exercise Prioritization Matrix 35 Calculate the final weighted scores for each alternative • Sort the items by their ranks to make them clearer for communication and decision making. 1 2 3 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 2 3 .. .. .. .. .. .. Scores Rank
  • 36.
    citoolkit.com Example Select the mostefficient data collection method. Prioritization Matrix 36 Criteria Cost Response time Quantity Weighted scores Rank  Option / Weight → 0.4 0.2 0.3 Questionnaire 4 1 4 4.8 1 Interview 2 4 1 4.3 2 Observation 3 2 3 3.7 3 Focus group 1 3 2 2.2 4 Note: High score of cost doesn’t mean that the cost is high, but low (or cost-effective)
  • 37.
    citoolkit.com Graphical Representation The outcomeof the analysis can be presented using a bar chart to see which alternative is the most suitable based on the scores of the team. Scores Alternatives Prioritization Matrix 37
  • 38.
    citoolkit.com Example Select the mostefficient data collection method. Prioritization Matrix 38 Criteria Cost Response time Quantity Weighted scores Rank  Option / Weight → 0.4 0.2 0.3 Questionnaire 4 1 4 4.8 1 Interview 2 4 1 4.3 2 Observation 3 2 3 3.7 3 Focus group 1 3 2 2.2 4 An ordered bar chart that represents the results Questionnaire Interview Observation Focus group
  • 39.
    citoolkit.com Example – ProjectSelection A manufacturing company needs to select two projects to be implemented this year. Consider the following project alternatives and criteria . . . Prioritization Matrix 39 Cost $ Savings $ 1st year (X3) Months to complete Energy reduction $36,000 $43,000 10 Spoilage reduction $30,000 $120,000 12 Reduce strap width $5,500 $11,000 3 Reduce stretch wrap usage $7,000 $4,000 5 Reduce over varnish usage $20,000 $66,000 8
  • 40.
    citoolkit.com Example – ProjectSelection It was agreed that savings should be given a weight of 3 as it is relatively more important than the other two criteria. Prioritization Matrix 40 Criteria Cost $ Savings $ (1st year) Months to complete Weighted scores Rank  Option / Weight → 1 3 1 Energy reduction 1 3X3= 9 2 12 4th Spoilage reduction 2 5X3 = 15 1 18 1st Reduce strap width 5 2X3 = 6 5 16 3rd Reduce stretch wrap usage 4 1X3 = 3 4 11 5th Reduce over varnish usage 3 4X3 = 12 3 18 1st
  • 41.
    citoolkit.com Four Field PrioritizationMatrix If there are only two evaluation criteria, the alternatives can be presented in a four-field matrix. Prioritization Matrix 41 A four-field matrix
  • 42.
    citoolkit.com Four Field PrioritizationMatrix – Example Prioritization Matrix 42 Consider Later Never Do Do First Consider Later + COMPLETION TIME – + COST – Reduce energy usage Reduce spoilage Reduce strap width Reduce stretch wrap usage Reduce over varnish usage
  • 43.
    citoolkit.com Further Information It isimportant to include people with enough knowledge of the situation to avoid missing any critical point. Prioritization Matrix 43
  • 44.
    © Copyright Citoolkit.com.All Rights Reserved. CITOOLKIT Made with by The Continuous Improvement Toolkit www.citoolkit.com