 Name : Janani .R
 Roll no : 200572718
 Guide name : Mrs. Sri jothi
 Role of PR as relationship management during crisis
 situation.
Aim: A relational approach to the study and practice of
  PR with respect to corporate.

Objective : To find the Role of Communication in
 the Practice of Relationship Management whether
 internal and external Advantages of a Relational
 Perspective in Crisis Management.
 Public relation is the management function that
  establishes and maintained mutually beneficial
  relationships between an organization and the publics
  on whom its success or failure depends – cutlip, center
  and broom (2006:5) united states
 James grunig has defined four descriptors of public
  relation activity press agentry/publicity, public
  information, two ways of symmetric and asymmetric
 Control mutuality
 Trust
 Commitment
 Satisfaction
 Exchange relationship
 Communal relationship
 Watson T and Noble P (2008)
 Evaluating public relations
 Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd.
 Page no: 4-8, 188-193
 Reporting upwards
 Relationships with others staff functions
 Controlling and influencing down stream public
  relation activities
 Subsidiary public relations teams
 Working with Subsidiary management
 Co ordination creates added value
 Relationships with target audiences
 Sales calls
 Company advisers
 The media
 Public relation colleagues
 Networking added value
 Beard M (2008)
 Running a public relation department
 Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd.
 Page no: 96-103, 110-117
 Uses and gratification theory- people are active users
  of media and select media based on their gratification
  for them
 Agenda setting theory-suggests that media content
  that people read, see and listen to sets the agenda for
  society’s discussion and interaction
 Oliver S (2008)
 Public relation strategy
 Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd.
 Page no: 4,5
 Attack the accuser
 Denial
 Excuse
 Justification
 Ingratiation
 Corrective action
 Full apology
 Coombs ,W.Timothy(1999)
 Ongoing crisis communication
 Sage Publications India Pvt.Ltd. New Delhi
 Page no: 120-123
 Explicating Relationship Management as a General
  Theory of Public Relations
 Published in: Journal of Public Relations Research,
  Volume 15, Issue 2 April 2003 , pages 181 - 198
 Author: John A. Ledingham
 Although the relationship management perspective of
  public relations is the focus of a substantial body of
  scholarship, a theory of that perspective has yet to be
  articulated and explicated. Herein, I review the emergence
  of the relational perspective, summarize the relevant
  literature, and construct a theoretical statement of that
  perspective. I then argue for relationship management as a
  general theory of public relations and offer suggestions for
  future research within a relational paradigm.
 Towards relationship management: Public
  relations at the core of organizational
  development
 Author(s): David Phillip Year: 2006 Page: 211 – 226
 Journal: Journal of Communication Management
 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
 Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline concepts that explore
  and extend the significance of public relations as a relationship
  management discipline.
 Design/methodology/approach – The paper postulates practice
  through which value is created to meet organisational objectives from
  the known or latent potential of tangible and intangible assets. In
  doing so, a definition and early research findings into the nature of
  relationships is put forwards and a definition of organisations as the
  nexus of relationships is proposed. The differentiation between
  organisational and interpersonal relationships is explored through a
  concept that organisations' tangible and intangible tokens are limited
  by a concept of materiality in a cultural setting.
  Findings – The paper posits that material value is released through a
  process of relationship change and a public relations practice of
  relationship management is put forward as a management discipline
  that can create value when the process of relationship management
  acting on material tokens is deployed.
  Originality/value – The paper explores how a public relations is an
  agent for changing the value of organizations.
 Title: Crisis management - public relations
 Author(s): Linda S. Ashcroft
 Journal: Journal of Managerial Psychology
 Year: 1997 Page: 325 – 332
 Article
  URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02683949710183522
 Considers management of information and effective communication at
  times of crisis. Examines recent crises to illustrate how and why poor
  management of information and communication has had disastrous
  effects. Discusses basic rules together with preparation and training for
  crisis management, including a crisis checklist, phone lines,
  spokespersons, conveying the message and training support staff.
  Comments on the need for the establishment of house rules to avoid
  problems. Discusses interpretations of “off the record” and how
  problems can arise from differing interpretations. Establishes the value
  of simultaneous communication to all audiences.
 Title :Relationship Management in Public Relations:
  Dimensions of an Organization-Public Relationship.
 Authors :Ledingham, John A.; Bruning, Stephen D.
 It States that scholars and practitioners are defining public
  relations as relationship management. Identifies, through
  qualitative research and verifies through quantitative
  research, relationship dimensions upon which good
  organization-public relationships are initiated, developed,
  and maintained. Surveys 384 telephone subscribers in
  territories competing for local phone service. Indicates that
  relationship dimensions of trust and commitment
  differentiate respondents who would stay with their
  provider. (PA)
 This paper explains that, by deploying
  positive public relations strategies within the organization
  itself, employees, who are often its most effective marketers to
  the outside world, are encouraged to spread the word about the
  organization to friends, family, potential consumers, and
  stockholders. The author points out that an effective
  internal public relations campaign can help build
  credibility,manage risks from unhappy employees, and establish
  a reputation of a positive and up-and-coming company through
  positive word-of-mouth, which drives sales figures upward. The
  paper stresses that the first step to positive
  internal publicrelations is to create a corporate community by
  showing an interest in the employee's family life and life outside
  of his or her immediate job responsibilities.
 Authors: Park, Hyojung. and Reber, Bryan.
 http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p233171_index.html
   The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of organization-
  public relationships on publics’ perceptions of a crisis and attitudes
  toward an organization in crisis. This study used a quasi-experimental,
  between-subjects design in which 262 participants were exposed to a
  fictitious crisis case at their university and the university’s four different
  crisis-response strategies. The results of a two-way ANOVA revealed that
  regardless of the level of relationship, publics in the internal cause
  group were more likely to attribute responsibility to the organization
  than were those in the external cause group. A three-way MANOVA found
  the unique effects of relationship, crisis responsibility, and the type of
  crisis-response strategy on attitudes toward the organization in the
  crisis, but two-way and three-way interactions among these predictor
  variables were not significant. The findings suggest that the cultivation
  of relationships with publics, as well as the effective use of crisis-
  response strategies, is an essential part of successful crisis management.
 This paper discusses what public relations means to a company's
  success and what effective public relations are supposed to achieve
  for a company. The paper explains that effective public relations is
  dependant on the company's ability to provide a positive
  company image to the public, focus on the stakeholders related to
  the company and produce a public relations plan that will serve as
  a guide for all public relations issues. The paper also explains that
  companies that are capable of in-depth planning with regard
  to public relationshave the ability to handle any issues that arise
  with positive outcomes. This includes damage to the company's
  image for any number of reasons and the company's ability to
  recover successfully. The recovery will ultimately be dependant
  on the image that the public has of the organization and
  the public's knowledge of honest concern that the business has in
  association with thepublic as stakeholders in the business.
 "First and foremost, PR serves as an educational tool for managers,
  employees, and customers. It can explain and demonstrate the quality
  vision of a corporation when presented in a true and real fashion.
  Moreover, public relations personnel must always be evaluating the
  concepts of this vision of quality. Constant evaluation must lead to
  improvements of the vision so as to avoid a stale plateau in the
  progression of the company. Credibility is lost without originality, and
  corporate employees tend to have a short attention span if they have
  already seen the used presentation method before. The information
  that is being presented to the company must be valid as well. The main
  purpose of public relations teams is communication. This point was
  stated earlier by Cutlip. This communication is a constant process,
  thereby establishing the responsibility of PR people to be able to
  provide information on demand. This ever-running cycle of
  communication causes a long-term outlook within public relations
  professionals. They, therefore, become future planners for corporations
  as well
 http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13632540610664751
 http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=74BC
    5F3E59B39B266FC87DF4492BA66C?contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkhtml
    &contentId=881320
   http://crisisprspin.blogspot.com/2008/03/blogs-as-effective-pr-tools.html
   http://www.slideshare.net/bnixon/public-relations-during-times-of-crisis-
    presentation
   http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1365/is_7_29/ai_54195577/
   http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-951848.html
   http://beta.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article4637.ece
   http://www.allacademic.com/one/www/research/index.php?click_key=1
   http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Crisis-Communications/96264
 http://www.academon.com/managing-crisis-pr
 http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Managing-Crisis-Using-
    Pr/119695
   http://crisisprspin.blogspot.com/-Kit
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_communications
   http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-951848.html
   http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13632540610664751
   http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/record
    Details/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchVal
    ue_0=EJ563772&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ563
    772
    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02683949710183522

Public relation

  • 2.
     Name :Janani .R  Roll no : 200572718  Guide name : Mrs. Sri jothi
  • 3.
     Role ofPR as relationship management during crisis situation.
  • 4.
    Aim: A relationalapproach to the study and practice of PR with respect to corporate. Objective : To find the Role of Communication in the Practice of Relationship Management whether internal and external Advantages of a Relational Perspective in Crisis Management.
  • 5.
     Public relationis the management function that establishes and maintained mutually beneficial relationships between an organization and the publics on whom its success or failure depends – cutlip, center and broom (2006:5) united states  James grunig has defined four descriptors of public relation activity press agentry/publicity, public information, two ways of symmetric and asymmetric
  • 6.
     Control mutuality Trust  Commitment  Satisfaction  Exchange relationship  Communal relationship
  • 7.
     Watson Tand Noble P (2008)  Evaluating public relations  Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd.  Page no: 4-8, 188-193
  • 8.
     Reporting upwards Relationships with others staff functions  Controlling and influencing down stream public relation activities  Subsidiary public relations teams  Working with Subsidiary management  Co ordination creates added value
  • 9.
     Relationships withtarget audiences  Sales calls  Company advisers  The media  Public relation colleagues  Networking added value
  • 10.
     Beard M(2008)  Running a public relation department  Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd.  Page no: 96-103, 110-117
  • 11.
     Uses andgratification theory- people are active users of media and select media based on their gratification for them  Agenda setting theory-suggests that media content that people read, see and listen to sets the agenda for society’s discussion and interaction Oliver S (2008) Public relation strategy Vinod vasishtha for kogan page india private ltd. Page no: 4,5
  • 12.
     Attack theaccuser  Denial  Excuse  Justification  Ingratiation  Corrective action  Full apology Coombs ,W.Timothy(1999) Ongoing crisis communication Sage Publications India Pvt.Ltd. New Delhi Page no: 120-123
  • 13.
     Explicating RelationshipManagement as a General Theory of Public Relations  Published in: Journal of Public Relations Research, Volume 15, Issue 2 April 2003 , pages 181 - 198  Author: John A. Ledingham  Although the relationship management perspective of public relations is the focus of a substantial body of scholarship, a theory of that perspective has yet to be articulated and explicated. Herein, I review the emergence of the relational perspective, summarize the relevant literature, and construct a theoretical statement of that perspective. I then argue for relationship management as a general theory of public relations and offer suggestions for future research within a relational paradigm.
  • 14.
     Towards relationshipmanagement: Public relations at the core of organizational development  Author(s): David Phillip Year: 2006 Page: 211 – 226  Journal: Journal of Communication Management  Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  • 15.
     Purpose –The purpose of this paper is to outline concepts that explore and extend the significance of public relations as a relationship management discipline.  Design/methodology/approach – The paper postulates practice through which value is created to meet organisational objectives from the known or latent potential of tangible and intangible assets. In doing so, a definition and early research findings into the nature of relationships is put forwards and a definition of organisations as the nexus of relationships is proposed. The differentiation between organisational and interpersonal relationships is explored through a concept that organisations' tangible and intangible tokens are limited by a concept of materiality in a cultural setting. Findings – The paper posits that material value is released through a process of relationship change and a public relations practice of relationship management is put forward as a management discipline that can create value when the process of relationship management acting on material tokens is deployed. Originality/value – The paper explores how a public relations is an agent for changing the value of organizations.
  • 16.
     Title: Crisismanagement - public relations  Author(s): Linda S. Ashcroft  Journal: Journal of Managerial Psychology  Year: 1997 Page: 325 – 332  Article URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02683949710183522  Considers management of information and effective communication at times of crisis. Examines recent crises to illustrate how and why poor management of information and communication has had disastrous effects. Discusses basic rules together with preparation and training for crisis management, including a crisis checklist, phone lines, spokespersons, conveying the message and training support staff. Comments on the need for the establishment of house rules to avoid problems. Discusses interpretations of “off the record” and how problems can arise from differing interpretations. Establishes the value of simultaneous communication to all audiences.
  • 17.
     Title :RelationshipManagement in Public Relations: Dimensions of an Organization-Public Relationship.  Authors :Ledingham, John A.; Bruning, Stephen D.
  • 18.
     It Statesthat scholars and practitioners are defining public relations as relationship management. Identifies, through qualitative research and verifies through quantitative research, relationship dimensions upon which good organization-public relationships are initiated, developed, and maintained. Surveys 384 telephone subscribers in territories competing for local phone service. Indicates that relationship dimensions of trust and commitment differentiate respondents who would stay with their provider. (PA)
  • 19.
     This paperexplains that, by deploying positive public relations strategies within the organization itself, employees, who are often its most effective marketers to the outside world, are encouraged to spread the word about the organization to friends, family, potential consumers, and stockholders. The author points out that an effective internal public relations campaign can help build credibility,manage risks from unhappy employees, and establish a reputation of a positive and up-and-coming company through positive word-of-mouth, which drives sales figures upward. The paper stresses that the first step to positive internal publicrelations is to create a corporate community by showing an interest in the employee's family life and life outside of his or her immediate job responsibilities.
  • 20.
     Authors: Park,Hyojung. and Reber, Bryan.  http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p233171_index.html The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of organization- public relationships on publics’ perceptions of a crisis and attitudes toward an organization in crisis. This study used a quasi-experimental, between-subjects design in which 262 participants were exposed to a fictitious crisis case at their university and the university’s four different crisis-response strategies. The results of a two-way ANOVA revealed that regardless of the level of relationship, publics in the internal cause group were more likely to attribute responsibility to the organization than were those in the external cause group. A three-way MANOVA found the unique effects of relationship, crisis responsibility, and the type of crisis-response strategy on attitudes toward the organization in the crisis, but two-way and three-way interactions among these predictor variables were not significant. The findings suggest that the cultivation of relationships with publics, as well as the effective use of crisis- response strategies, is an essential part of successful crisis management.
  • 21.
     This paperdiscusses what public relations means to a company's success and what effective public relations are supposed to achieve for a company. The paper explains that effective public relations is dependant on the company's ability to provide a positive company image to the public, focus on the stakeholders related to the company and produce a public relations plan that will serve as a guide for all public relations issues. The paper also explains that companies that are capable of in-depth planning with regard to public relationshave the ability to handle any issues that arise with positive outcomes. This includes damage to the company's image for any number of reasons and the company's ability to recover successfully. The recovery will ultimately be dependant on the image that the public has of the organization and the public's knowledge of honest concern that the business has in association with thepublic as stakeholders in the business.
  • 22.
     "First andforemost, PR serves as an educational tool for managers, employees, and customers. It can explain and demonstrate the quality vision of a corporation when presented in a true and real fashion. Moreover, public relations personnel must always be evaluating the concepts of this vision of quality. Constant evaluation must lead to improvements of the vision so as to avoid a stale plateau in the progression of the company. Credibility is lost without originality, and corporate employees tend to have a short attention span if they have already seen the used presentation method before. The information that is being presented to the company must be valid as well. The main purpose of public relations teams is communication. This point was stated earlier by Cutlip. This communication is a constant process, thereby establishing the responsibility of PR people to be able to provide information on demand. This ever-running cycle of communication causes a long-term outlook within public relations professionals. They, therefore, become future planners for corporations as well
  • 23.
     http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13632540610664751  http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=74BC 5F3E59B39B266FC87DF4492BA66C?contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkhtml &contentId=881320  http://crisisprspin.blogspot.com/2008/03/blogs-as-effective-pr-tools.html  http://www.slideshare.net/bnixon/public-relations-during-times-of-crisis- presentation  http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1365/is_7_29/ai_54195577/  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-951848.html  http://beta.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article4637.ece  http://www.allacademic.com/one/www/research/index.php?click_key=1  http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Crisis-Communications/96264
  • 24.
     http://www.academon.com/managing-crisis-pr  http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Managing-Crisis-Using- Pr/119695  http://crisisprspin.blogspot.com/-Kit  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_communications  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-951848.html  http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/13632540610664751  http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/record Details/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchVal ue_0=EJ563772&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ563 772  http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02683949710183522