This article applies a critical flaw analysis to psychiatric drugs for children and concludes the evidence does not support drugs as a first line choice.
Past nonmedical opioid use could predict future heroin use among teensΔρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
Two studies published yesterday point to predictors of teens using drugs. Researchers in one study found that teens who used opioids when they were not prescribed for medical reasons were more likely to later use heroin. Of the nearly 3,300 high schoolers who were included in the study, those who previously used opioids were about 11% more likely to use heroin, while those who currently used opioids were about 13% more likely to use heroin.
Another study found that there was no increase in teenagers using marijuana if they lived in a state that had laws legalizing the drug. In fact, in states with recreational marijuana laws, the odds of teen marijuana use were about 10% less following legalization.
This article applies a critical flaw analysis to psychiatric drugs for children and concludes the evidence does not support drugs as a first line choice.
Past nonmedical opioid use could predict future heroin use among teensΔρ. Γιώργος K. Κασάπης
Two studies published yesterday point to predictors of teens using drugs. Researchers in one study found that teens who used opioids when they were not prescribed for medical reasons were more likely to later use heroin. Of the nearly 3,300 high schoolers who were included in the study, those who previously used opioids were about 11% more likely to use heroin, while those who currently used opioids were about 13% more likely to use heroin.
Another study found that there was no increase in teenagers using marijuana if they lived in a state that had laws legalizing the drug. In fact, in states with recreational marijuana laws, the odds of teen marijuana use were about 10% less following legalization.
Global Medical Cures™ | Get Smart about Drugs- How Teens Abuse Medicine Global Medical Cures™
Global Medical Cures™ | Get Smart about Drugs- How Teens Abuse Medicine
DISCLAIMER-
Global Medical Cures™ does not offer any medical advice, diagnosis, treatment or recommendations. Only your healthcare provider/physician can offer you information and recommendations for you to decide about your healthcare choices.
Presentation by Christine Reilly, then executive director of the Institute for Research on Gambling Disorders, at the North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) 2006 Annual Conference. Presentation focuses on research trends in the field of gambling disorders.
This chapter is from Drugging Our Children (Olfman & Robbins, 2012), a great book about the epidemic prescription of antipsychotics to children, especially poor children and children of color.
This is the summary text of a presentation at the Vatican addressing: "The Question of the Use of Pharmaceuticals in Pediatrics." This presentation covers the clinical trial evidence and offers prescription guidelines
CHAPTER NINEMedicating ChildrenThis chapter is divided into se.docxDinahShipman862
CHAPTER NINE
Medicating Children
This chapter is divided into seven sections. Section One is an overview that discusses current trends in medicating children, problems the trends cause, and directions for the future. It also discusses developmental issues. Section Two focuses on stimulant medication and the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Section Three focuses on research on combined interventions and particularly the Multimodal Treatment Study (MTA study) of Children with ADHD. Section Four focuses on children taking mood stabilizers. Section Five focuses on antipsychotics and children. Sections Six and Seven focus on anxiolytics and antidepressants in children, respectively.
SECTION ONE: PERSPECTIVES, DILEMMAS, AND FUTURE PARADIGMS
Learning Objectives
• Understand the problematic increase in psychotropic medications for children despite a dearth of evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs.
• Have a general understanding of the impact of the FDA Modernization Act and the Best Pharmaceuticals Act for Children.
• Be able to state the “developmental unknowns” associated with giving kids psychotropic medications.
Thus far, we have explored the medical model and psychological, cultural, and social perspectives as they relate to psychopharmacology. In this chapter, we demonstrate that using psychotropic medications with children and adolescents raises particular problems and concerns from several perspectives. As discussed in Chapter Three, we frequently see explanations and justifications from the medical model perspective used to reduce childhood disorders to chemical and genetic problems, excluding crucial consideration of environmental traumas, developmental foreclosures, or life stressors.
We explore child and adolescent psychopharmacology primarily from the medical model perspective but complement this approach with information from the other perspectives (psychological, cultural, and social). We set the stage by exploring the current status of the treatment of children and adolescents with mental and emotional disorders. This chapter is structured differently from the others in this book. We begin by discussing the context from the social and cultural perspectives and the problems with prescribing psychotropic medications to children. Then we cover an introduction to stimulants used to treat symptoms of ADHD. Finally, we give the status of their current use since the last edition of the book if that is possible.
THE COMPLEX STATE OF THERAPY
Dr. Frank O'Dell, Professor Emeritus of Counseling in the College of Education and Human Services at Cleveland State University, has argued in all his lectures on counseling children and adolescents that the United States is an “anti-kid” society (Personal Communication, 2001). By that he means fewer and fewer therapists and psychiatrists choose to treat or continue to work with children in counseling. To support his argument, O'Dell points out that resources for childre.
Global Medical Cures™ | Get Smart about Drugs- How Teens Abuse Medicine Global Medical Cures™
Global Medical Cures™ | Get Smart about Drugs- How Teens Abuse Medicine
DISCLAIMER-
Global Medical Cures™ does not offer any medical advice, diagnosis, treatment or recommendations. Only your healthcare provider/physician can offer you information and recommendations for you to decide about your healthcare choices.
Presentation by Christine Reilly, then executive director of the Institute for Research on Gambling Disorders, at the North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) 2006 Annual Conference. Presentation focuses on research trends in the field of gambling disorders.
This chapter is from Drugging Our Children (Olfman & Robbins, 2012), a great book about the epidemic prescription of antipsychotics to children, especially poor children and children of color.
This is the summary text of a presentation at the Vatican addressing: "The Question of the Use of Pharmaceuticals in Pediatrics." This presentation covers the clinical trial evidence and offers prescription guidelines
CHAPTER NINEMedicating ChildrenThis chapter is divided into se.docxDinahShipman862
CHAPTER NINE
Medicating Children
This chapter is divided into seven sections. Section One is an overview that discusses current trends in medicating children, problems the trends cause, and directions for the future. It also discusses developmental issues. Section Two focuses on stimulant medication and the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Section Three focuses on research on combined interventions and particularly the Multimodal Treatment Study (MTA study) of Children with ADHD. Section Four focuses on children taking mood stabilizers. Section Five focuses on antipsychotics and children. Sections Six and Seven focus on anxiolytics and antidepressants in children, respectively.
SECTION ONE: PERSPECTIVES, DILEMMAS, AND FUTURE PARADIGMS
Learning Objectives
• Understand the problematic increase in psychotropic medications for children despite a dearth of evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs.
• Have a general understanding of the impact of the FDA Modernization Act and the Best Pharmaceuticals Act for Children.
• Be able to state the “developmental unknowns” associated with giving kids psychotropic medications.
Thus far, we have explored the medical model and psychological, cultural, and social perspectives as they relate to psychopharmacology. In this chapter, we demonstrate that using psychotropic medications with children and adolescents raises particular problems and concerns from several perspectives. As discussed in Chapter Three, we frequently see explanations and justifications from the medical model perspective used to reduce childhood disorders to chemical and genetic problems, excluding crucial consideration of environmental traumas, developmental foreclosures, or life stressors.
We explore child and adolescent psychopharmacology primarily from the medical model perspective but complement this approach with information from the other perspectives (psychological, cultural, and social). We set the stage by exploring the current status of the treatment of children and adolescents with mental and emotional disorders. This chapter is structured differently from the others in this book. We begin by discussing the context from the social and cultural perspectives and the problems with prescribing psychotropic medications to children. Then we cover an introduction to stimulants used to treat symptoms of ADHD. Finally, we give the status of their current use since the last edition of the book if that is possible.
THE COMPLEX STATE OF THERAPY
Dr. Frank O'Dell, Professor Emeritus of Counseling in the College of Education and Human Services at Cleveland State University, has argued in all his lectures on counseling children and adolescents that the United States is an “anti-kid” society (Personal Communication, 2001). By that he means fewer and fewer therapists and psychiatrists choose to treat or continue to work with children in counseling. To support his argument, O'Dell points out that resources for childre.
1Joseph Role of Opioid Education for the YouthEsther Joscargillfilberto
1
Joseph
Role of Opioid Education for the Youth
Esther Joseph
Miami Regional University ENC 2201— Report Writing and Research MethodsResearch Paper
Dr. Uliana Gancea
April 11, 2020
Opioid Abuse by the Youth
Opioids are substances that act on the opioid receptors so as to produce a morphine like outcome. They are used for pain relief, including anesthesia. They are also used to suppress diarrhoea, replacement therapy for opioid use disorder, suppressing cough as well as for executions in the United States. Opioids apart from being used for medical purposes they are also frequently used for non-medical purposes. When induced they give a euphoric effect and can also be used to prevent withdrawal (Satterley & Anitescu, 2015). In the United States there have been a lot of youths who use opioids for their euphoric effects. Due to their addictive nature, they have seen a lot of youths addicted to the substances which many result to fatal and adverse effects on the substance abuser.
Opioids are responsible for 1.7 deaths in 10, 000 people. Most of these people are young adults between 18 years to 25 years. Due to the rise in the use of this substances there have been introduction of educating the youths about the drugs. This is to create awareness as well as educate the youth on what to expect if they get themselves mixed up with the practice. In this paper we pose the question, what is the role of opioid education to the youth? We will talk about the impact that the program will have on the youths, be it positive or negative (Knaggs, 2019).
Opioids act by binding to opioid receptors, these are found principally in the peripheral and central nervous system as well as the gastrointestinal tract. These receptors mediate both the somatic as well as the psychoactive effects that opioids cause. Opioid drugs include antagonists like naloxegol which are used for opioid induced constipation and partial agonists like the anti diarrhoea drug loperamide (McDONOUGH, 2016). Due to opioids nature of being addictive and might result in fatal overdose, most of them are controlled substances. In the year 2013, between 28 and 38 million people were using opioids illicitly. That is 0.6% to 0.8% of the global population between the ages 15 and 65. In the year 2011, it was estimated that 4 million people in the United States used opioids recreationally and were dependent on them. As of 2015, increased numbers of recreational use and addiction were attributed to over prescription of the medication and inexpensive illicit heroin.
Literature review
The National Institutes of Health has a healing initiative for over 50 million Americans who suffer from chronic pain. Opioids medications are the most common for treating pain although effective and safe non opioid options for pain management are lacking. The used of opioids to treat acute and chronic pain has contributed to approximately 10.3 million people aged 12 years and older in the united states in 2018 who abus ...
1Proposal Effectiveness of non-pharmacological in Compari.docxdurantheseldine
1
Proposal: Effectiveness of non-pharmacological in Comparison to
Methylphenidate Stimulant Therapy
Barbara Maclure
9/18/2022
2
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological in Comparison to
Methylphenidate Stimulant Therapy
Introduction
Attentive–deficit hyperactivity is a psychological disorder that is well known, affecting
both children and adults. Some of the associated symptoms that are associated with ADHD include
inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and difficulty in focusing. It is reported that in the United
States, about 8.5% of children are affected by ADHD. In the treatment process, several ways have
been put into place. Despite the treatment, many studies reported that some treatment methods
have side effects. Therefore, knowing the method that least has the side effects is crucial. This
research proposal will play an essential role as it will identify whether non-pharmacological
intervention, behavioral therapy, and stimulant therapy have the same results in children aged 4 to
8.
Background of the study
Dr. George first identified ADHD when he was a pediatrician. He noted that his patients
had uncontrollable impulsive behavior. There was an introduction of the drug Benzedrine, which
was approved as it showed to improve ADHD symptoms in children. In 1950 there was the
introduction of Ritalin drugs which were used in ADHD treatment in both children and
adolescents. (Holland & Higuera (2017). The drug that is used in the treatment of ADHD to date is
Ritalin. Despite the doctors treating patients with ADHD symptoms from the 1930s, there was no
actual definition of ADHD. Still, it was given much attention in 1987 when the American
Psychiatric Association (APA) redefinition of the disorder.
3
By 2020, approximately 7.1 million young children aging between 2-17 years with ADHD
had been diagnosed. (Garbe (2018). Despite the prevalence of the disorder among children and
adolescents, ADHD is also present in adulthood. In most cases, this disorder is noted when the
child gets into the class and starts issues of failing to focus on the classroom. There are different
forms of ADHD which entails hyperactive/impulsive type, inattentive type, or a combination of the
two. There is a criterion that is customarily utilized in the treatment of ADHD. The parents and the
teacher are required to document the children's symptoms for a period of six months. Research
shows that ADHD is more common in males than women. One of the interventions utilized is
stimulant therapy, considered standard treatment for children after reaching an appropriate age.
The stimulus, for example, the medication, is said to have side effects which can be either mild or
severe. Some noticeable side effects include upset stomach, appetite change, heart abnormalities,
tics, and weight loss. Although the treated symbols are 70-80% treated, there can be the utilization
of.
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costsfor Children and Adol.docxwillcoxjanay
Trends in Psychotropic Medication Costs
for Children and Adolescents, 1997-2000
Andrés Martin, MD, MPH; Douglas Leslie, PhD
Objective: To examine trends in psychotropic medi-
cation utilization and costs for children and adolescents
between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000.
Methods: Pharmacy claims were analyzed for mental
health users 17 years and younger (N = 83 039) from a
national database covering 1.74 million privately in-
sured youths. Utilization rates and costs for dispensed
medications were compared across psychotropic drug cat-
egories and individual agents over time.
Results: Overall use of psychotropic drugs increased from
59.5% of mental health outpatients in 1997 (a 1-year
prevalence of 28.7 per 1000) to 62.3% in 2000 (33.7 per
1000), a 4.7% increase. The largest changes in utiliza-
tion were seen for atypical antipsychotics (138.4%), atypi-
cal antidepressants (42.8%), and selective serotonin re-
uptake inhibitors (18.8%). The average prescription price
increased by 17.6% ($7.90 per prescription), a change
in turn attributed to a shift toward costlier medications
within the same category (55.1% of the increase, or $4.35)
and to pure inflation (44.9% of the increase, or $3.55;
P for trend �.001 for all comparisons). Almost half
(46.7%) of the $2.7 million gross sales differential was
accounted for by only 3 of the 39 drugs identified (am-
phetamine compound, risperidone, and sertraline), and
75% was accounted for by 7 drugs (the previous 3 and
bupropion, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and citalopram).
Conclusions: Psychotropic drug expenditure increases
during the late 1990s resulted from more youths being
prescribed drugs, a preference for newer and costlier medi-
cations, and the net effects of inflation. The impact of man-
aged care and pharmaceutical marketing effects on these
trends warrants further study.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:997-1004
T
HE USE of psychotropic
medications in children has
become a highly visible is-
sue, receiving regular at-
tention from academics (for
a recent summary, see Jensen et al1), poli-
cymakers,2,3 and the lay press alike.4-6 In
contrast to the controversial and at times
charged reactions that the topic can en-
gender, reliable national estimates of the
extent of pediatric use of psychotropic
drugs have only recently started to be-
come available.7-9 Previous studies10,11 have
documented that most psychotropic medi-
cations are not prescribed by mental health
specialists but rather by general practi-
tioners, a pattern that is certainly appli-
cable to stimulants, the most widely used
psychotropic drug class for children: in
1995, pediatricians prescribed 50% of
stimulants, family practitioners 20%, and
psychiatrists only 13%.8
The financial implications of pediat-
ric pharmacotherapy have gone largely un-
examined, an important shortcoming given
that in the US expenditures for prescrip-
tion drugs have continued to be the fastest
growing component of health care across
a ...
Iacapap workshop on PRESCRIBING FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: PERSPECTIVE FR...Devashish Konar
Discusses the best way to reach the minimum important information to professionals who deal with mental health of children and adolescents and prescribe psychotropic medicines to them.
Where your md meets my jd when the doctor says yes but the treatment team say...Mrsunny4
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse and several published studies1, 80 percent of heroin users reported using prescription opioids prior to heroin.
SparksDuncan2013: Outside the Black Box: Re-assessing Pediatric Antidepressan...Barry Duncan
Sparks, J., & Duncan, B. (2013). Outside the black box: Re-assessing pediatric antidepressant prescription. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 240-256.
Objective: The purpose of this review is to assess whether evidence supports a favorable risk/benefit profile for pediatric antidepressant use and reconsideration of the black box. Method: The review examines studies post-black box purporting to show declines in pediatric antidepressant use and rising youth suicide, summarizes evidence for efficacy and safety of pediatric antidepressants, and discusses irregularities in recent meta-analyses of fluoxetine for youth. Results: Pediatric antidepressant prescription did not significantly decline post-black box and youth suicide has risen only in recent years. Recent meta-analyses fail to undermine evidence that antidepressants are associated with increased risk of suicidality in youth. Conclusions: First line prescription of antidepressants for youth is not advisable. The black box and international warnings on pediatric use of antidepressants are warranted. Wider availability of psychosocial options for depressed youth is recommended.
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Sujoy Dasgupta
Dr Sujoy Dasgupta presented the study on "Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility? – The unexplored stories of non-consummation" in the 13th Congress of the Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction (ASPIRE 2024) at Manila on 24 May, 2024.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system
It is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system and is located in front of the rectum and just below the urinary bladder
Function is to store and secrete a clear, slightly alkaline fluid that constitutes 10-30% of the volume of the seminal fluid that along with the spermatozoa, constitutes semen
A healthy human prostate measures (4cm-vertical, by 3cm-horizontal, 2cm ant-post ).
It surrounds the urethra just below the urinary bladder. It has anterior, median, posterior and two lateral lobes
It’s work is regulated by androgens which are responsible for male sex characteristics
Generalised disease of the prostate due to hormonal derangement which leads to non malignant enlargement of the gland (increase in the number of epithelial cells and stromal tissue)to cause compression of the urethra leading to symptoms (LUTS
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramLevi Shapiro
June 20, 2024, Prix Galien International and Jerusalem Ethics Forum in ROME. Detailed agenda including panels:
- ADVANCES IN CARDIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM IS COMING
- WOMEN’S HEALTH: FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS,
ONCOLOGICAL AND INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASES?
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICS
- GENE THERAPY
- BEYOND BORDERS: GLOBAL INITIATIVES FOR DEMOCRATIZING LIFE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN LIFE SCIENCES
- Prix Galien International Awards Ceremony
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
1. Running head: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 1
Psychotropic Medication Use in Foster Youth within the United States
Alexandra V. Bembanaste & Elizabeth Wolf
Florida International University
04/17/2018
2. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 2
Summary
About one half to three quarters of children and youth entering foster care in the United
States exhibit symptoms that warrant mental health care (Lansverk, Burns, Stambaugh, & Reutz,
2009). Commonly used effective treatments for both adults and adolescents experiencing mental
health symptoms are psychosocial interventions, case management services, individual or group
counseling, and at times, use of psychotropic medication. When appropriate services are not
available or accessible, in a timely manner, psychotropic medication is often prescribed (Alavi &
Calleja, 2012; Lohr & Jones, 2016).
Current context
Research shows that in the United States over the past two decades, the use of
psychotropic medication for children and adolescents has risen, especially in foster care youth
(Narendorf, Bertram, & McMillen, 2011). This is evident as seen in the high rate of “13% to
37% of foster care youth on psychotropic medications compared to the 4% of youth in the
general population” (Alavi & Calleja, 2012, p.2). The former director of the National Institute of
Mental Health referenced a “five-fold increase in the number of children under 18 on psycho-
stimulants from 1988-1994 to 2007–2010, with the most recent rate of 4.2 percent” in 2014
(Insel, 2014, para. 2). The recent increase in psychotropic medication use can be linked to new
pharmaceutical marketing strategies, barriers to accessing services, and insurance coverage
issues (Magellan Health, 2017). Considering the fast-acting nature of these medications, the
accompanying side effects can be serious. Consequently, conducting a thorough assessment of
the benefits and risks is needed before administering or acquiring court authorization to
administer to children and adolescents. Recently, there has been concern from supporters and
opponents of medication administration to youth concerning the proper oversight and monitoring
when using psychotropic medications (GAO, 2011).
3. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 3
Factors that leave this population at an increased risk for medication error are prevalent
off-label use, frequent movement of placements, and involvement with multiple-organizations
and systems (U.S. Government Accountability Office [GAO], 2011). In order to tackle these
factors, a multidisciplinary team approach must be taken and psychosocial treatment must
accompany psychotropic medication use to achieve the best outcomes (Houshyar, 2014; Crimson
& Argo, 2009; Alavi & Calleja, 2012). Some evidence-based psychosocial/therapeutic
interventions that have been cited to be effective with this population are “Multi-systemic
Therapy (MST), Functional Family Therapy (FFT), and Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT)” (Houshyar, 2014, p. 8).
Psychotropic medication use
Due to the complexity of experiences and trauma experienced by this population,
children/youth in care often present with indicators of more than one mental disorder (Crimson
& Argo, 2009; GAO, 2011; Magellan Health, 2017). Alavi & Calleja, (2012) found that about
“80% of all youth involved in the child welfare system have emotional and behavioral problems,
developmental delays, and other conditions requiring mental health services” (p.78). Factors
such as availability and limited resources may affect access to these services and sometimes
children may not be able to access them at all. Scozzaro & Janikowski (2015) found that only
half of foster care youth receive the proper psychosocial/therapeutic interventions that should
accompany the use of these medications.
Therefore, psychotropic medication often becomes the first and only line of treatment
when psychosocial interventions are not available as seen by the high rates of polypharmacy and
psychotropic medication use. For example, “a 2.5- to eightfold increase in the rate of
polypharmacy” and “13.5% of children and adolescents in foster care are prescribed
4. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 4
psychotropic medications” (Naylor et al., 2007, p. 175). Due to this high prevalence rate, all
child welfare professionals and stakeholders must be aware of the pros and cons concerning their
administration and use, as well as the protocols to be followed if deemed ‘medically necessary’
by a medical professional.
Child welfare and medical professionals have found medications such as stimulants,
psychotropics, and mood stabilizers to be effective chemical treatments for children and youth in
foster care. Prevalent disorders and issues amongst this population that warrant medications
include ADHD, anxiety-related disorders, bipolar disorder, depression, mood instability, and
aggression (Crimson & Argo, 2009; Solchany, 2011;Lohr & Jones,2016).
Although there are a variety of environmental and psychosocial factors that contribute to
these issues/disorders, medication is often favorable because it can target the biological nature of
some mental disorders. For example, Landsverk et al. (2009) notes that stimulants have positive
effects in treating comorbid issues in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
(ADHD) and is cited as one of the “most effective treatments for ADHD in psychiatry” (Crimson
& Argo, 2009, p.3). Another class of drugs that has been widely used and effective in adults and
children in treating anxiety-related disorders and depression is Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors (SSRI). Specifically, fluoxetine (a SSRI) is often used as it is the only Food and Drug
Administration-approved medication for use in children and adolescents with depression.
Lithium, a mood stabilizer, has been effective in treating mood instability and Risperidone, a
medication for treating aggression in youth ,are other popular psychotropic medications
commonly used in this population (Crimson & Argo,2009; Lohr & Jones, 2016). Similarly,
another antipsychotic that is heavily used with adults and children is Risperdal as it has been
“effective in reducing disruptive behaviors” (Crimson & Argo, 2009, p.3).
5. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 5
In Florida, “foster children were prescribed psychotropic drugs at rates 2.7 to 4.5 times
higher than were non-foster children in Medicaid in 2008” (GAO, 2011, p. 16). To address the
concern raised by the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) about the
high rate of psychotropic use in Florida, state officials suggest that this higher incidence is due to
the higher prevalence rate of mental health issues in this population compared to non-foster
children (GAO, 2011).
Due to the medication’s potential effectiveness and higher prevalence of trauma
experienced by those in foster care, children and youth are often prescribed antipsychotic
medications that have not been fully studied for use with this age group. For example,
“thousands of foster children were prescribed doses exceeding maximum levels cited in
guidelines based on information in FDA -approved drug labels” (GAO, 2011, p.7). Among
supporters and opponents, this prescribing practice is their biggest concern. Although, many
clinical trials have been conducted on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications in adults,
this is not the case for children and adolescents. Due to the vulnerable nature of youth, many
pharmaceuticals companies shy away from conducting trials on psychotropic medications with
this population. For example, “before the FDA initiated a pediatric program in 1998, only about
20 percent of drugs approved by the FDA were labeled for pediatric use” (FDA, 2016, para.2).
More recently, the “FDA has approved only 31% of psychotropic medications for use in
children or adolescents. However, it is estimated that currently more than 75% of the
prescriptions written for psychiatric illness in this population is off-label in usage” (Solchany,
2011, p. 17).
Therefore, as their symptomatology worsens, doctors are left by necessity to prescribe
off-label use; estimating dosage by a child's size, weight, and what has worked in the past for
6. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 6
other adults with similar symptoms. Because this occurs, professionals cite the importance of
using a combination of appropriate monitoring techniques and accompanying psychosocial
interventions (Alavi & Calleja, 2012; Lohr & Jones, 2016; Solchany, 2011).
Additionally, there has been concern that some data may suggest increasing number of
youth receiving medications without concurrent mental health services (Alavi & Calleja, 2012;
Lohr & Jones, 2016; Houshyar, 2014). The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS),
make note that the higher rates of psychotropic use may be due to the lack of timely access to
effective behavioral health care, as well as fewer evidence-based psychosocial interventions for
children/youth than for adults. Therefore, both supporters and opponents advocate for protocols
that must be followed when a child is on these medications.
Efforts being made
Houshyar (2014) “reported that 26 states had written policy/guideline on psychotropic
medication use; 13 states were in the process of developing a policy/ guideline; and 9 states had
no policy/ guideline on psychotropic medication use” (p.6). Along with developing
policies/guidelines, some states such as Texas, North Carolina, & Rhode Island have
implemented innovative performance improvement measures such as health program services
that directly engage all stakeholders of this issue in efforts to address concerns regarding
psychotropic medication use in foster care youth. For example, Texas has instituted a program
that benefits foster care youth by establishing the STAR Health Program. According to Houshyar
(2014), “the STAR health program serves 30,000 children and youth in foster care and
administers the electronic Health Passport, which is largely populated by Medicaid claims and
pharmacy data, with more limited input by providers” (p.6). After program implementation,
Texas has seen increases in health wellness visits and decreases in psychiatric admissions,
7. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 7
psychotropic medication use, and polypharmacy prevalence amongst this population. A North
Carolina, also, developed a pilot program called A+KIDS aimed at children 18 and under on
Medicaid, including those in foster care. This initiative requires physicians “prescribing
medication to children on Medicaid to use a web-based application that ensures physicians have
information on psychotropics, side effects, and possible alternatives before writing a
prescription” (Houshyar, 2014, p. 6). Rhode Island has made changes in their prescribing
practices by enlisting “psychiatrists to oversee the prescribing of psychotropic medications for
foster care youth and requires administrators to get consent from the consulting psychiatrist for
new prescriptions, as well as, flag new medication requests and obtain the consulting
psychiatrist’s authorization” (Houshyar, 2014, p.7).
Although advances have been made in changing prescribing practices, efforts to
safeguard this population are still being made. Policy makers, general public, and related
organizations (such as the AACAP and CMS) still raise concern about the limited “use of
evidence-based therapies, appropriateness of medication dosage that are often not fully supported
by documentation, concurrent use of these medications, and the use of psychotropics in infants”
(p.7).
Legislation
The administration of these medications to children and youth has brought much pressure
to policymakers to establish protocols to safeguard this population. Previous laws and policies
that have addressed psychotropic medication use and contributed to the current administrative
code in Florida are the Child & Family Services Improvement Act of 2006, Fostering
Connections to Success & Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, and Child & Family Services
Improvement & Innovation Act of 2011.
8. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 8
Child & Family Services Improvement Act of 2006 ensures that medically-related
professionals are both “consulted and involved” in the assessment of well-being for the child and
his/her treatment plan (Child & Family Services Improvement Act, 2006). Fostering Connections
to Success & Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 “requires the state to develop a plan for ongoing
oversight and coordination of health care services for any child in foster care placement”
(Fostering Connections to Success & Increasing Adoptions Act, 2008, p. 13). This addresses a
main component of the use of psychotropics with this population because continual oversight
and monitoring of the side effects and its actual effectiveness in reducing symptoms is key for
the appropriate treatment of the child. Child & Family Services Improvement & Innovation Act
of 2011 requires that states plan for “oversight and coordination of healthcare services for any
child in foster care placement to include an outline of monitoring and treatment of emotional
trauma associated with child maltreatment and removal from home and to protocols for
appropriate use in monitoring of psychotropic medications” (Child & Family Services
Improvement & Innovation Act, 2011, p.1).
Although states differ in their protocols for authorizing administration of psychotropic
medication, Florida requires biological parent consent. In the case that parental consent cannot
be obtained or is denied, court approval is pursued if deemed medically
necessary. “Unfortunately, states still report many cases where children in foster care were given
psychotropic drugs without the required legal consent. Child advocates and clinicians see this as
an area that needs to be rectified given the importance of the decision to use psychotropic agents
in children” (Magellan Health, 2017, p.8).
The Florida Administrative Code Chapter Title: Psychotropic Medication for Children in
Out of Home Care 65C-35.007: Authority to provide psychotropic medication to children in out
9. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 9
of home care states that when a child is placed in out of home care, the “parents or legal
guardians retain the right to consent or decline the administration of psychotropic medications
for the child taken into state care”. If parental rights are still intact, parents or guardians may
decline to approve the administration of psychotropic medications or withdraw consent.
However, “if any party related to the dependency action believes that the medication is in the
best interest of the child and medically necessary”, the case manager must follow a series of
steps for the court to override this decision.
The case manager must contact the prescribing practitioner within one business day of
being notified. The prescribing practitioner then determines whether the medication is medically
necessary for the child despite the lack of authorization from parents or legal guardian(s). A
Medical Report must be completed by the prescribing practitioner and provided to Children’s
Legal Services within three days in order to file a motion seeking court authorization for the
administration of psychotropic medication (Fla. Admin. Code R. 65C-35.007).
Our proposal
Currently in Florida, it is required that all children in state custody have their dependency
cases reviewed periodically to assess efforts made towards permanency and review of their
treatment/case plan. Citizen review panels (CRP) are comprised of educated citizen volunteers
that utilize a form of performance improvement measures by examining the mechanisms of the
child welfare system and “making suggestions for improvement” by examining randomly chosen
cases and creating reports on findings (Jones, 2004, p. 1118). Because this population is so
vulnerable, all necessary safeguards and review measures must be taken to ensure the
appropriateness of all aspects of their care, especially when powerful psychotropic medications
are being administered.
10. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 10
The Child Welfare Institute published a review series on foster care review boards/panels
and found that review boards/panels further support accountability and improve outcomes by
examining all efforts being made to help the child in question (“Strategic Planning for Effective
Foster Care Review”, 2002). Review panels “often provide the only opportunity to monitor
critical case activities and how law and policy are implemented” “Strategic Planning for
Effective Foster Care Review”, 2002, p.17). A study conducted by Jones (2004) shows that
review panels/boards have been effective in increasing communication between child welfare
professionals and sheds light on roles and limitations of those involved. An effective review
panel that consists of child-welfare related professionals would be able to examine if there were
any instances that psychotropic medications were inappropriately administered, either due to
dosage errors or diagnosis errors.
Our proposal is to implement a medically-based review panel that would comprise of a
psychiatrist, two psychiatric nurses, a Guardian Ad Litem, a child welfare attorney, and Licensed
Clinical Social Worker. These professionals were selected because of their exposure and
expertise regarding child-welfare. The review panel will meet monthly and conduct an in-depth
review on 10 randomly chosen child welfare cases that pursued court authorization for
psychotropic medication. The panel will gather all related information and records regarding the
child’s family, psychiatric, social, and medical history in order to fully assess the dependent
child’s case in order to maintain accountability of all parties involved, evaluate all medications
and treatment, and track progress towards outcomes.
We suggested this review panel because it provides multiple perspectives from
professionals regarding many aspects of the child’s case plan. Also, unlike the prescribing
practitioner that advises the court regarding psychotropic medication for the child, the review
11. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 11
panel will have sufficient time and available resources to review all details of the case, especially
in those cases that biological parents or legal guardian(s) declined to consent for psychotropic
medication. Also, members of the panel can assist in identifying and suggesting proper
monitoring and oversight techniques if improvement is needed in this area. Much like the CRP’s,
our medical review panel will adopt a multidisciplinary team approach to review medications,
psychosocial treatments, steps to permanency, and other components of the child’s case plan.
In conclusion, the use of psychotropic medication to address signs and symptoms of
mental health in foster children warrants special precautions due to the powerful nature of these
drugs. Proper oversight and monitoring is needed due to procedures such as off-label use and
unavailability of complimentary therapeutic interventions in order to ensure better outcomes for
this vulnerable population.
12. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 12
References
Alavi, Z., & Calleja, N. G. (2012). Understanding the use of psychotropic medications in
the child welfare system: Causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Child
Welfare, 91(2), 79-94. Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/1509394958?accountid=10901
Brenner, S. L., Southerland, D. G., Burns, B. J., Wagner, H. R., Farmer, E. M., & Z.
(2014). Use of psychotropic medications among youth in treatment foster
care.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(4), 666-674.
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.fiu.edu/10.1007/s10826-013-9882-3 Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/1512524730?accountid=10901
Child and Family Service Improvement Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-28, 120 Stat. 1234 (2006).
Child & Family Services Improvement & Innovation Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-34, 125 Stat.
369 (2011).
Crismon, M. L., & Argo, T. (2009). The use of psychotropic medication for children in
foster care. Child Welfare, 88(1), 71-100. Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/213808574?accountid=10901
Congressional Research Service. (2017, February). Child Welfare: Oversight of psychotropic
medication for children in foster care (CRS Report No. 43466). Retrieved from
Congressional Research Service website:
13. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 13
https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20170217_R43466_74f90fe0b0a68eead9696c2dd8
7a56129a95e227.pdf
Fla. Admin. Code R. 65C-35.007
Fostering Connections to Success & Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-351,
122 Stat. 3949 (2008).
Houshyar, S. (2014). Caring for Our Kids: Are We Overmedicating Children in Foster
Care? (pp. 5-7). Washington, DC: United States House of Representatives.
Insel, T. (2014). Post by former NIMH director Thomas Insel: Are children overmedicated?.
National Institute of Mental Health. Retrieved 23 February 2018, from
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2014/are-children-
overmedicated.shtml
Jones, B. (2004). Effectiveness of citizen review panels. Children And Youth Services
Review, 26, 1117-1127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.003
Landsverk, J. A., Burns, B. J., Stambaugh, L. F., & Reutz, J. A. R. (2009). Psychosocial
interventions for children and adolescents in foster care: Review of research
literature. Child Welfare, 88(1), 49-69. Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/213807053?accountid=10901
Lohr, W. D., & Jones, V. F. (2016). Mental health issues in foster care. Pediatric
Annals, 45(10), e342-348. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.fiu.edu/10.3928/19382359-
20160919-01 Retrieved from http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-
14. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 14
proquest-com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/1828187274?accountid=10901
Magellan Health Inc. (2017). Appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents:
A clinical monograph: Important issues and evidence-based treatments. Retrieved from
https://www.magellanprovider.com/media/55579/psychotropicdrugsinkids.pdf
Narendorf, C. S., Bertram, J., & McMillen, C. J. (2011). Diagnosis and medication overload? A
nurse review of the psychiatric histories of older youth in treatment foster care. Child
Welfare 90(3), 27-43.
Naylor, M. W., Davidson, C. V., Ortega-Piron, D., Bass, A., Gutierrez, A., & Hall, A.
(2007). Psychotropic medication management for youth in state care: Consent,
oversight, and policy considerations. Child Welfare, 86(5), 175-92. Retrieved
from http://ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/213808250?accountid=10901
Scozzaro, C., & Janikowski, P. T. (2015). Mental health diagnosis, medication, treatment and
placement milieu of children in foster care. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 24 (9),
2560-2567.
Strategic Planning for Effective Foster Care Review. (2002). AFSA+ Foster Care Review Series.
Retrieved 12 April 2018, from
http://web.archive.org/web/20030517052003/http://www.nafcr.org/docs/Strategic_Planni
ng_Effective_Foster_Care.pdf
15. PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USE 15
Solchany J. (2011). Psychotropic medication and children in foster care: Tips for advocates and
judges. Practice and Policy Brief, American Bar Association Center on Children and the
Law.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2016). Drug Research and Children. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143565.htm
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2011, December). Foster Children: HHS Guidance
Could Help States Improve Oversight of Psychotropic Prescriptions. (Publication No.
GAO-12-201) Retrieved from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/590/586906.pdf