The document discusses the 'progress principle,' which highlights that making progress in meaningful work significantly boosts motivation and performance. Research indicates that few managers effectively understand or leverage this principle, failing to prioritize support for making progress over other motivators. It outlines methods for improving team performance, such as visualizing progress, removing obstacles, and emotionally supporting team members.

1. The Progress Principle
Executive Summary
Managers and clients are always seeking ways to improve a teams
performance, as well as an individuals’ motivation.
Teresa M. Amabile and Steven J. Kramer of Harvard Business Review
provides data driven insight and the tools to help managers and
Scrum Masters to improve team and team member performance
through a principle they coined – “Progress Principle”.
Unknowingly, the Progress Principle is supported in Agile through
rituals: sprint demos, retrospectives and even the daily stand-up. It is
also achieved through Lean and Agile philosophies as well as the
focus on continuous improvement.

2. Executive Summary Continued
What Teresa and Steven discovered was that, ….“Of all the things that can
boost emotions, motivation, perceptions and ultimately result in higher
performance, the single most important factor is making progress in
meaningful work”.
“The more frequently people experience the sense of progress, the more
likely they are to be creatively productive”…
….“The power of progress is fundamental to human nature, but few
managers understand it or know how to leverage progress to boost
motivation.” In fact, the study reveals that the progress principle is rarely
understood and practiced by leadership.

3. Executive Summary (Cont.) / Hypotheses
….”A central driver of creative, productive performance was the quality of a
person’s “inner-work life” – the mix of emotions, motivations and perceptions over
the course of a workday”…… in the realm of knowledge work, people are more
creative and productive when the inner work lives are positive…. …….they are
intrinsically motivated.
I would like to hypothesis that the challenge that teams and organizations have
to fully reap the benefits of the Progress Principle; is Executives, Managers and
Scrum Masters need to become more methodical in there approach and
behavior towards:
1. Daily visualizing meaningful progress
2. Removing obstacles/impediments, especially external organizational-
wide issues (Teresa & Steve refer to these as Inhibitors)
3. Emotionally support the individual (Teresa & Steve refer to these as
Nourishers)

4. The Research
669 Managers surveyed around the world are asked with a survey: What
managerial approaches/tools that can affect employees motivation and
emotions.
7 companies, 26 project teams, 238 individuals, 12,000 diary entries.
In one section of research respondents were asked to rank the following
managerial behaviors/tools that affect employee motivations and emotions
that drives performance:
• Support for making progress in work: (Power of Progress)
• Recognition for good work
• Incentives
• Interpersonal support
• Clear goals

5. Ranked Findings
• Only 5% ranked Support for making progress in work #1
• Recognition for good work (public or private) was ranked #1 closely
followed by Incentives.
• Many Managers ranked Clear goals and Interpersonal support as the
most important drivers.

6. Progress Principle Requirements
• Meaningful work
• The importance of daily work progress, make progress salient
• Transparency and visibility of team progress (Visualize your work)
• Invest time, money and resources to remove external impediments that
are a common recurring theme
• Focus on managing progress, not people (Try not maximizing resources
(people), but the work)
• Safe and transparent work environment
• Emotionally support the team and team member

7. AVOID: striping the “meaning” from
meaningful work?
1. When managers, leads, and team members don’t recognize in earnest
new ideas, suggestions, opinions
2. Honest recognition for achievements (Being able to be transparent
about failure)
3. Continuous reassignment of team members
4. Continuous shifting priorities of work that is in flight
5. Product Owners or Manager can spend more time making more
concrete in how the team’s work is contributing

8. Manage the Work:
Inner Work Life Triggers
1. Team/Group Level
• Catalysts
• Toxins
2. Individual Level
• Nourishers
• Inhibitors

9. (More of) Catalysts
1. Setting clear goals
2. Allowing autonomy (Recall Dan Pink: Autonomy, Mastery,
Purpose)
3. Sufficient access to resources (people, hardware, tools)
4. Time
5. Leads help with the work
6. Openness (and safe environment) in learning from problems,
failures and successes
7. Free exchange of ideas and solutions

10. (less of) Toxins
1. Disrespect towards the individual
2. Discouragement of ideas and solutions
3. Disregard for emotions
4. Interpersonal conflicts within the team

11. (More of) Nourishers
1. Interpersonal support
2. Respect for the individual
3. Encouragement
4. Emotional comfort
5. Opportunities for affiliation and camaraderie

12. (Less of) Inhibitors (opposite of catalysts)
1. Confusion or constant shifting of priorities
2. Work assigned to team members as opposed to team members pulling
work
3. Team lacks resources and support to change organizational
impediments
4. Time expectations are not realistic
5. Failures are not positively supported and learned from
6. Lack of supporting new ideas or “not having time” to experiment

13. The White Paper
For the paper and a copy of the Daily Progress Checklist that you can use
to become methodical and eventually alter your behavior in support of
the Progress Principle:
http://goo.gl/07fMpX (Paper)
http://goo.gl/maLjTM (PDF)

14. Credits
All information is credited to Teresa M. Amabile, Steven J. Kramer and
Harvard Business Review.