A group of Udon Thani's Iron Ladies shout "No Potash!", a phrase
 that has become their battle cry in a four year struggle against a
                 proposed mine in their village.
Answer the following questions based on information in 2 readings:

1) The New Thai Capitalism: Development or Disaster?
http://clpmag.org/article.php?article=The-New-Thai-Capitalism-Development-or-
Disaster_162

2) The potash project: Thailand's first underground mine – Canadian Mining
Journal (abridged version should be attached)

Questions:
1) Who are the “Iron Ladies” and what is their mission? Do you think the age and
gender of the “Iron Ladies” has affected the way Thai society, government
officials and industry reps have responded to their protests? What if the protests
were led by college students? or young male farmers?

2) Why did the mining company lobby for changes in Thailand's Mineral Act of
2002? What has the mining company done to address public skepticism about
foreign owned companies?

3) Identify several potential negative environmental impacts of the proposed
mining project.
4) What types of technologies does the mining company plan to employ to minimize
negative environmental impacts?

5) What types of public benefits does the mining company claim will come about if the
mine is developed? Do any of the villagers believe these claims?

6) Estimate the potential economic value (in US dollars) of the Udon potash reserves.
Assume 500 million tons of potash ore with an average K2O content of 20% can be
economically extracted. Assume a world price of $500 per ton of potash fertilizer
containing 60% K2O.

7) How do the 2 articles differ in their tone? (Hint: compare words used to describe
local opposition to the mine)? Do you think one article is more likely to be accurate or
objective than the other? Explain.

8) How do you think members of your community would react if a mining company
wanted to extract minerals from deep underneath your community and claimed that
the mining would *not* significantly disrupt current land uses or harm the
environment?

9) As far as I can tell, mining still has not begun in Udon and the Iron Ladies have
remained unwavering in their opposition. What do you think will happen? Do you think
a compromise is possible?
In Latin and German, Kalium = Potassium ?
Why is potassium represented by the symbol  K
       39K is the dominant isotope.
       40K (radioactive) and 41K (stable)

       are used as tracers.
Typical quantities of nutrients in Midwest farm soils (kg/ha)

      Element      Total                Exchangeable   Solution
      K            38,000               190            10-30
      Ca           8000                 2250           60-120
      Mg           6000                 450            10-20
      N            3500                 -na-           7-25
      P            900                  -na-           0.05-0.15
      S            700                  -na-           2-10

                           1 kg/ha = 0.89 lbs/ac


The total potassium content of most Midwest soils is
    tens of thousands of lbs per acre-plow layer
   but most of the K is locked up in minerals like
        K feldspar that release K very slowly
Depth of
So where did all
                        loess cap
this potassium
  come from?

     K-rich
    primary
    minerals




                     A loess cap covers
                     about 2/3rds of IL
           Glacial
          outwash
Cyril Hopkins
wrote a ground-
    breaking
   bulletin on
  potassium in
IL soils almost a
  century ago.




                    http://www.archive.org/stream/potassiumfromsoi00hopk#page/n3/mode/2up
Is this possible?
Luxury consumption
Unavailable (90 to 98%)
                           K
   K                                              K+        K+
         Soil Minerals                                 Soil solution   K+
       (feldspar, mica)
                                                          K+
   K         K         K                                         Readily
                                                                 available
                                                                 (0.1 to 2%)
                                            K+   K+    K+ K+

        Soil Colloid                         Soil Colloid
       Trapped K
                                            K+   K+     K+ K+
       Soil Colloid
                           Slowly available (1 to 10%)
Important potassium concepts
      No significant gaseous forms

3rd most likely (after N and P) to be plant
                  limiting

    Non-toxic at high concentrations

    Does not promote eutrophication
           (unlike N and P)
Role of potassium in plant nutrition
Remains in ionic form inside plants (rather than being
       incorporated into organic molecules)

   Very important osmotic regulator (lowers water
           potential inside of plant cells)

            Activator of over 80 enzymes

        1-4% of plant dry matter (similar to N)

  Important for tolerance of environmental and biotic
    stresses (drought tolerance, winter hardiness,
resistance to fungal pathogens, resistance to insects)

Important for crop quality (flavor, color, stem strength)
Necrotic leaf margins are associated with
          potassium deficiency
K deficiency symptoms can occur even when soil test K levels are high




                    Corn in ridge-till and no-till
                     systems are often first to
                   show K deficiency symptoms,
                    but they can occur in other
                      tillage systems as well.




 Uptake of K by plants requires an active root system, especially in
         the soil zone where plant-available K is located !!

When this soil zone is dry, uptake is limited. Anything that exerts additional stress
  or limits root growth--compacted soil layers, root pruning, side-wall smearing--
further reduces K uptake, especially when root growth is restricted in the zones of
                                highest available K.
Crop removal of K by grain crops is small compared to forages
Vegetable crops use a lot of potassium !

Crop                 Yield      N    P2O5   K2O
Bell Peppers       180 cwt     137    52    217
Cabbage             20 tons    130    35    130
Peas                25 cwt     164    35    105
Potatoes (white)   30,000 lb    90    48    158
Snap Beans          4 tons     138    33    163
Sweet Corn          90 cwt     140    47    136
Tomatoes            20 tons    120    40    160


       Many veggies use more K2O than N!
Average K2O application rates for fruit and vegetable crops in the US
Fertilizers do not actually contain K2O


1 lb of elemental K = 1.2047 lbs of K2O


  Crops do not actually take up K2O
The more highly weathered
soils in southern IL tend to have
  low CECs. Pockets of sandy
  soils (grey shaded areas) in
  northern and central IL also
          have low CECs

  Most soils in the “high” region
 shown on this slide have CECs
       12 centimols / kg.

 1 centimol/kg = 1 meq / 100 g

  Most soils in the “low” region
 shown on this slide have CECs
     < 12 centimols / kg.

 The U of Ilinois recommends
higher soil test K for soils with
         higher CEC!
Crop response to extractable K in low CEC soils




                                   No maintenance
                     Sufficiency
Crop response to extractable K in highCEC soils
Crop response to extractable K in low CEC soils




                                   No maintenance
                     Sufficiency
Iowa State has updated their K recommendations
             for corn and soybeans




  How do you convert between ppm and lbs/acre?
Variation in soil test K critical levels across the US and Canada




    http://www.ipni.net/ipniweb/portal.nsf/0/c13f0cf310f1903e062577c7005a4bd7/$FILE/2010%20Critical%20P%20and%20K%20Maps.pdf
Why do different states have different soil test critical levels?




 Part of the reason is differences in soils but climate, cropping
   systems and data interpretation philosophy also matter.
Some labs recommend much higher K levels for soils with high CECs




      http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/ff/Soil_test_P_and_K_buildup_and_drawdown.htm
Soil testing methods for potassium
       used by US labs in 2005




Traditional method



                            Universal
                           extractant
                        adopted by more
NH4+ exchanges with      labs every year
 K+ on soil colloids
Soil Test K survey results
                (> 4 million samples from ~ 60 labs)




Change between 2005 and 2010       % of samples below critical level


            Declines in many states but not IL
Soil test values for K fluctuate during the year




   K is more available in wet soils
Drying of moist samples increases soil test K
General rule of thumb:

4 lbs of K2O are required to raise soil test K by 1 lb
Annual application vs. build up and maintenance
Some soils have high K fixation capacity
Economic response to K fertilization is most likely when soil test K
   is low and K fertilizer is cheap relative to the price of corn.




             K fertilizer is cheap relative to grain prices
                                                                                                high
                                                                                                medium
                                                                    K fertilizer is expensive   low
                                                                    relative to grain prices




                                                              low                               high
What really happens to
     fertilizer K?
                Only 20 to 60% of applied K is
                 taken up by crops in year 1
                Highest recovery on low K soils
                              Why??
                          Slowly
  Available K                                    Unavailable K
                        Available K

        The K in KCl (muriate of potash) is near 100% plant
         available but is not the only source of K (and other
       cations) in the soil. Also, crop roots normally explore a
         much larger volume than the zone of amendment
Relationship Between Soil Test K Level and Yield
   Response to Starter Fertilizer in WI - 1995
                            100
                                                                                               QRP
                            80                                                        y=343-6.82x+0.034x2
                                                                                            if x<100
  Yield response, bu/acre




                            60                                                            y=0 if x>100
                                                                                         R2=0.52 n=54
                            40

                            20

                             0

                            -20
                                      VL   L     O                  H                             EH
                            -40      (47) (19) (-2)                (8)                            (1)

                                   50                  100               150                     200                     250
                                                                  Soil test K, ppm
                                  www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
Relationship between temperature and maximum soil test K
  level where yield response occurred to starter fertilizer


                   2500




                                                                                                                      Air temperature departure ,oF
                             1995                            y = 1119 - 0.84x + 0.00017x2                        1
                   2400                                                     R2 = 0.97
  Cumulative GDD




                   2300
                                                                                                                 0

                   2200
                                                1994
                                                                                                                 -1
                   2100

                                                                 1993                              1996
                   2000
                                                                                                                 -2

                                 100             110           120          130
                                            Critical soil test K level, ppm
                          www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
Compaction affects nutrient uptake !

Potassium Affected Most
• Compaction reduces porosity and
  limits root growth
• Lowers soil O2 and slower
  replenishment from the atmosphere
• O2 needed for root respiration and
  active uptake of K
• Compacted soils are often
  responsive to K fertilization



       www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
Row K Effects on Corn Yield with
     Increasing Soil Compaction

                                     Initial K Soil test = 102 ppm




www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
Plant analysis for K in soybean leaves at R1 can be a useful tool for
identifying K deficiencies. Critical levels ranging from 1.2 to 1.7% K
  have historically been recommended in many Corn Belt states.
        It now appears that higher K levels are needed in
                   conservation tillage systems.




                                                                         (Yin and Vyn, 2005)
             Leaf samples consisted of the most recently fully
         developed trifoliate leaves, including the petiole, collected
          from 20 plants at R1 in mid- to late-July from each plot
It’s well documented that alfalfa will
   take-up K beyond its needs if high
       levels of soil or applied K are
available. This is referred to as “luxury
              consumption”.
Soils containing high
levels of magnesium and
  calcium generally need
higher levels of potassium
   to maintain high crop
 yields due to competitive
        ion effects.
High soil test K:Mg ratios
   Over many years of looking at plant analysis samples, we
     have seen that where the soil test ratio (lb:lb) of K:Mg is
      greater than 1.5:1; many crops are likely to suffer Mg
         shortages. This is often in spite of the soil having
    "adequate" amounts of Mg in the soil. Where the soil test
       ratio of K:Mg is between 1:1 and 1.5:1, grass crops,
     including corn may be at risk of an Mg shortage. While
      such an induced Mg deficiency can reduce yields, it is
    possibly a bigger problem for livestock that consume the
   green chop or silage. When these high soil K:Mg ratios are
    combined with low to marginally sufficient Mg and/or acid
         soils, the probability of Mg deficiency increases.

http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/ff/Potassium_basics.htm
Does Cation Balance Matter?




                                                                   http://www.pda.org.uk/leaflets/6/no6-print.htm
 The relative concentration of potassium, calcium, magnesium,
ammonium, and other positively charged ions in the soil solution
                influences their relative uptake.

 Excessively high concentrations of one cation often results in
             inadequate uptake of other cations.

For example, very high concentrations of calcium reduce uptake
                           Grass tetany
of potassium and very high concentrations of potassium reduce
                     magnesium uptake.


       Cation balance affects animal health
Potassium Fertilizers
                                         K 2O
                     Chemical
Material                                Content
                     Formula
                                           %
      “Potash” = muriate of potash = MOP
                                               guaranteed
potassium chloride   KCl                  60   analysis

sul-po-mag           K 2 SO 4 2MgSO 4     20
potassium nitrate    KNO 3                44
potassium sulfate    K 2 SO 4             50
Used in organic agriculture
Potassium fertilizer sales in IL
        Material               fall06 spring07
        0-0-60                207,410 143,041
MOP     0-0-62                 92,880 86,821
   99.1 % of material grade     569,491 tons
        94% of total
The chloride in MOP has
negative effects on some crops

    Tobacco fertilized with MOP
 produces cured leaves with muddy
  and uneven color with excessive
   hygroscopicity and poor burn.
MOP is salty stuff !
White potash is produced of KCl, NaCl and other salts. and
         Potash ore is a mix by a process of dissolution
     The KCl is concentrated using a flotation process which
recrystallization. Potash ore is dissolved under pressure in
        skims off the surface of a fluid suspension of finely
 hot brine, and MOP is precipitated further processed and
      crushed ore. This concentrate is
                                          as the brine cools and
pressure reduces. resulting fertilizer materialthis process, and
     screened. The The iron is removed in is ~ 95 percent
the resulting MOP fertilizer isbecauseWhite MOP is generally
      MOP. It is reddish in color white. iron impurities in the
           at least are not removed in this process.
                 ore 98 percent potassium chloride.
Global K fertilizer production and consumption




 Total world production = 33 million metric tons of K2O in 2007
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/potash/mcs-2008-potas.pdf
Canada has the largest potash reserves
    and also exports the most potash

Total global economic reserves ~ 8 billion metric tons
PotashCorp produces 23% of the world's supply of potash.

PC also controls most of the world's unused supply, and has
historically held back production to keep potash prices high.
PC is the world's largest fertilizer company
#1 in potash, #3 in phosphate and #4 in nitrogen fertilizers
How much does potash cost in IL this fall?
Potash prices were up about $5.50 a ton last week in
 Illinois, with the average price at $639, ranging from
    $600 to $710. Illinois prices remain about $25 a ton
cheaper than Iowa, which is more in line with our forecast
      models, which puts spring prices at $690 a ton.
Why does Potash track differently than Ammonia and DAP?

Potassium

  • 1.
    A group ofUdon Thani's Iron Ladies shout "No Potash!", a phrase that has become their battle cry in a four year struggle against a proposed mine in their village.
  • 2.
    Answer the followingquestions based on information in 2 readings: 1) The New Thai Capitalism: Development or Disaster? http://clpmag.org/article.php?article=The-New-Thai-Capitalism-Development-or- Disaster_162 2) The potash project: Thailand's first underground mine – Canadian Mining Journal (abridged version should be attached) Questions: 1) Who are the “Iron Ladies” and what is their mission? Do you think the age and gender of the “Iron Ladies” has affected the way Thai society, government officials and industry reps have responded to their protests? What if the protests were led by college students? or young male farmers? 2) Why did the mining company lobby for changes in Thailand's Mineral Act of 2002? What has the mining company done to address public skepticism about foreign owned companies? 3) Identify several potential negative environmental impacts of the proposed mining project.
  • 3.
    4) What typesof technologies does the mining company plan to employ to minimize negative environmental impacts? 5) What types of public benefits does the mining company claim will come about if the mine is developed? Do any of the villagers believe these claims? 6) Estimate the potential economic value (in US dollars) of the Udon potash reserves. Assume 500 million tons of potash ore with an average K2O content of 20% can be economically extracted. Assume a world price of $500 per ton of potash fertilizer containing 60% K2O. 7) How do the 2 articles differ in their tone? (Hint: compare words used to describe local opposition to the mine)? Do you think one article is more likely to be accurate or objective than the other? Explain. 8) How do you think members of your community would react if a mining company wanted to extract minerals from deep underneath your community and claimed that the mining would *not* significantly disrupt current land uses or harm the environment? 9) As far as I can tell, mining still has not begun in Udon and the Iron Ladies have remained unwavering in their opposition. What do you think will happen? Do you think a compromise is possible?
  • 4.
    In Latin andGerman, Kalium = Potassium ? Why is potassium represented by the symbol K 39K is the dominant isotope. 40K (radioactive) and 41K (stable) are used as tracers.
  • 5.
    Typical quantities ofnutrients in Midwest farm soils (kg/ha) Element Total Exchangeable Solution K 38,000 190 10-30 Ca 8000 2250 60-120 Mg 6000 450 10-20 N 3500 -na- 7-25 P 900 -na- 0.05-0.15 S 700 -na- 2-10 1 kg/ha = 0.89 lbs/ac The total potassium content of most Midwest soils is tens of thousands of lbs per acre-plow layer but most of the K is locked up in minerals like K feldspar that release K very slowly
  • 6.
    Depth of So wheredid all loess cap this potassium come from? K-rich primary minerals A loess cap covers about 2/3rds of IL Glacial outwash
  • 7.
    Cyril Hopkins wrote aground- breaking bulletin on potassium in IL soils almost a century ago. http://www.archive.org/stream/potassiumfromsoi00hopk#page/n3/mode/2up
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Unavailable (90 to98%) K K K+ K+ Soil Minerals Soil solution K+ (feldspar, mica) K+ K K K Readily available (0.1 to 2%) K+ K+ K+ K+ Soil Colloid Soil Colloid Trapped K K+ K+ K+ K+ Soil Colloid Slowly available (1 to 10%)
  • 11.
    Important potassium concepts No significant gaseous forms 3rd most likely (after N and P) to be plant limiting Non-toxic at high concentrations Does not promote eutrophication (unlike N and P)
  • 12.
    Role of potassiumin plant nutrition Remains in ionic form inside plants (rather than being incorporated into organic molecules) Very important osmotic regulator (lowers water potential inside of plant cells) Activator of over 80 enzymes 1-4% of plant dry matter (similar to N) Important for tolerance of environmental and biotic stresses (drought tolerance, winter hardiness, resistance to fungal pathogens, resistance to insects) Important for crop quality (flavor, color, stem strength)
  • 13.
    Necrotic leaf marginsare associated with potassium deficiency
  • 14.
    K deficiency symptomscan occur even when soil test K levels are high Corn in ridge-till and no-till systems are often first to show K deficiency symptoms, but they can occur in other tillage systems as well. Uptake of K by plants requires an active root system, especially in the soil zone where plant-available K is located !! When this soil zone is dry, uptake is limited. Anything that exerts additional stress or limits root growth--compacted soil layers, root pruning, side-wall smearing-- further reduces K uptake, especially when root growth is restricted in the zones of highest available K.
  • 15.
    Crop removal ofK by grain crops is small compared to forages
  • 16.
    Vegetable crops usea lot of potassium ! Crop Yield N P2O5 K2O Bell Peppers 180 cwt 137 52 217 Cabbage 20 tons 130 35 130 Peas 25 cwt 164 35 105 Potatoes (white) 30,000 lb 90 48 158 Snap Beans 4 tons 138 33 163 Sweet Corn 90 cwt 140 47 136 Tomatoes 20 tons 120 40 160 Many veggies use more K2O than N!
  • 17.
    Average K2O applicationrates for fruit and vegetable crops in the US
  • 18.
    Fertilizers do notactually contain K2O 1 lb of elemental K = 1.2047 lbs of K2O Crops do not actually take up K2O
  • 19.
    The more highlyweathered soils in southern IL tend to have low CECs. Pockets of sandy soils (grey shaded areas) in northern and central IL also have low CECs Most soils in the “high” region shown on this slide have CECs 12 centimols / kg. 1 centimol/kg = 1 meq / 100 g Most soils in the “low” region shown on this slide have CECs < 12 centimols / kg. The U of Ilinois recommends higher soil test K for soils with higher CEC!
  • 20.
    Crop response toextractable K in low CEC soils No maintenance Sufficiency
  • 21.
    Crop response toextractable K in highCEC soils Crop response to extractable K in low CEC soils No maintenance Sufficiency
  • 22.
    Iowa State hasupdated their K recommendations for corn and soybeans How do you convert between ppm and lbs/acre?
  • 23.
    Variation in soiltest K critical levels across the US and Canada http://www.ipni.net/ipniweb/portal.nsf/0/c13f0cf310f1903e062577c7005a4bd7/$FILE/2010%20Critical%20P%20and%20K%20Maps.pdf
  • 24.
    Why do differentstates have different soil test critical levels? Part of the reason is differences in soils but climate, cropping systems and data interpretation philosophy also matter.
  • 25.
    Some labs recommendmuch higher K levels for soils with high CECs http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/ff/Soil_test_P_and_K_buildup_and_drawdown.htm
  • 26.
    Soil testing methodsfor potassium used by US labs in 2005 Traditional method Universal extractant adopted by more NH4+ exchanges with labs every year K+ on soil colloids
  • 27.
    Soil Test Ksurvey results (> 4 million samples from ~ 60 labs) Change between 2005 and 2010 % of samples below critical level Declines in many states but not IL
  • 28.
    Soil test valuesfor K fluctuate during the year K is more available in wet soils
  • 29.
    Drying of moistsamples increases soil test K
  • 30.
    General rule ofthumb: 4 lbs of K2O are required to raise soil test K by 1 lb
  • 31.
    Annual application vs.build up and maintenance
  • 32.
    Some soils havehigh K fixation capacity
  • 33.
    Economic response toK fertilization is most likely when soil test K is low and K fertilizer is cheap relative to the price of corn. K fertilizer is cheap relative to grain prices high medium K fertilizer is expensive low relative to grain prices low high
  • 34.
    What really happensto fertilizer K? Only 20 to 60% of applied K is taken up by crops in year 1 Highest recovery on low K soils Why?? Slowly Available K Unavailable K Available K The K in KCl (muriate of potash) is near 100% plant available but is not the only source of K (and other cations) in the soil. Also, crop roots normally explore a much larger volume than the zone of amendment
  • 35.
    Relationship Between SoilTest K Level and Yield Response to Starter Fertilizer in WI - 1995 100 QRP 80 y=343-6.82x+0.034x2 if x<100 Yield response, bu/acre 60 y=0 if x>100 R2=0.52 n=54 40 20 0 -20 VL L O H EH -40 (47) (19) (-2) (8) (1) 50 100 150 200 250 Soil test K, ppm www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
  • 36.
    Relationship between temperatureand maximum soil test K level where yield response occurred to starter fertilizer 2500 Air temperature departure ,oF 1995 y = 1119 - 0.84x + 0.00017x2 1 2400 R2 = 0.97 Cumulative GDD 2300 0 2200 1994 -1 2100 1993 1996 2000 -2 100 110 120 130 Critical soil test K level, ppm www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
  • 37.
    Compaction affects nutrientuptake ! Potassium Affected Most • Compaction reduces porosity and limits root growth • Lowers soil O2 and slower replenishment from the atmosphere • O2 needed for root respiration and active uptake of K • Compacted soils are often responsive to K fertilization www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
  • 38.
    Row K Effectson Corn Yield with Increasing Soil Compaction Initial K Soil test = 102 ppm www.soils.wisc.edu/extension/teachingmaterials/Wolkowski/RowPlacedFertilizer2004.ppt
  • 39.
    Plant analysis forK in soybean leaves at R1 can be a useful tool for identifying K deficiencies. Critical levels ranging from 1.2 to 1.7% K have historically been recommended in many Corn Belt states. It now appears that higher K levels are needed in conservation tillage systems. (Yin and Vyn, 2005) Leaf samples consisted of the most recently fully developed trifoliate leaves, including the petiole, collected from 20 plants at R1 in mid- to late-July from each plot
  • 40.
    It’s well documentedthat alfalfa will take-up K beyond its needs if high levels of soil or applied K are available. This is referred to as “luxury consumption”.
  • 41.
    Soils containing high levelsof magnesium and calcium generally need higher levels of potassium to maintain high crop yields due to competitive ion effects.
  • 42.
    High soil testK:Mg ratios Over many years of looking at plant analysis samples, we have seen that where the soil test ratio (lb:lb) of K:Mg is greater than 1.5:1; many crops are likely to suffer Mg shortages. This is often in spite of the soil having "adequate" amounts of Mg in the soil. Where the soil test ratio of K:Mg is between 1:1 and 1.5:1, grass crops, including corn may be at risk of an Mg shortage. While such an induced Mg deficiency can reduce yields, it is possibly a bigger problem for livestock that consume the green chop or silage. When these high soil K:Mg ratios are combined with low to marginally sufficient Mg and/or acid soils, the probability of Mg deficiency increases. http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/ff/Potassium_basics.htm
  • 43.
    Does Cation BalanceMatter? http://www.pda.org.uk/leaflets/6/no6-print.htm The relative concentration of potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium, and other positively charged ions in the soil solution influences their relative uptake. Excessively high concentrations of one cation often results in inadequate uptake of other cations. For example, very high concentrations of calcium reduce uptake Grass tetany of potassium and very high concentrations of potassium reduce magnesium uptake. Cation balance affects animal health
  • 44.
    Potassium Fertilizers K 2O Chemical Material Content Formula % “Potash” = muriate of potash = MOP guaranteed potassium chloride KCl 60 analysis sul-po-mag K 2 SO 4 2MgSO 4 20 potassium nitrate KNO 3 44 potassium sulfate K 2 SO 4 50 Used in organic agriculture
  • 45.
    Potassium fertilizer salesin IL Material fall06 spring07 0-0-60 207,410 143,041 MOP 0-0-62 92,880 86,821 99.1 % of material grade 569,491 tons 94% of total
  • 46.
    The chloride inMOP has negative effects on some crops Tobacco fertilized with MOP produces cured leaves with muddy and uneven color with excessive hygroscopicity and poor burn.
  • 47.
    MOP is saltystuff !
  • 48.
    White potash isproduced of KCl, NaCl and other salts. and Potash ore is a mix by a process of dissolution The KCl is concentrated using a flotation process which recrystallization. Potash ore is dissolved under pressure in skims off the surface of a fluid suspension of finely hot brine, and MOP is precipitated further processed and crushed ore. This concentrate is as the brine cools and pressure reduces. resulting fertilizer materialthis process, and screened. The The iron is removed in is ~ 95 percent the resulting MOP fertilizer isbecauseWhite MOP is generally MOP. It is reddish in color white. iron impurities in the at least are not removed in this process. ore 98 percent potassium chloride.
  • 49.
    Global K fertilizerproduction and consumption Total world production = 33 million metric tons of K2O in 2007
  • 50.
  • 51.
    Canada has thelargest potash reserves and also exports the most potash Total global economic reserves ~ 8 billion metric tons
  • 52.
    PotashCorp produces 23%of the world's supply of potash. PC also controls most of the world's unused supply, and has historically held back production to keep potash prices high.
  • 53.
    PC is theworld's largest fertilizer company #1 in potash, #3 in phosphate and #4 in nitrogen fertilizers
  • 54.
    How much doespotash cost in IL this fall?
  • 55.
    Potash prices wereup about $5.50 a ton last week in Illinois, with the average price at $639, ranging from $600 to $710. Illinois prices remain about $25 a ton cheaper than Iowa, which is more in line with our forecast models, which puts spring prices at $690 a ton.
  • 57.
    Why does Potashtrack differently than Ammonia and DAP?