CHAPTER 3
Determining Moral Behavior
Lecture slides prepared by Lisa J. Taylor
Harold
Hall’s
Wrongful
Conviction
• Harold Hall was wrongfully convicted in
1990 of a double homicide and rape.
• He was sentenced to life in prison without
parole.
• In 2004, he was released after post-
conviction DNA tests confirmed his
innocence.
• For 19 years, Hall spent his time reading
everything he could, including magazines,
newspapers and law books pertaining to
advances in DNA identification
technology and its uses in cases similar
to his.
• But the work paid off. In 2004, in addition
to earning his GED, Hall got his sentence
reversed and won his freedom.
Justice
• Fairness
• Related to equal treatment
• Equality
• Refers to equal shares or treatment
• Impartiality
• Refers to the concept of equal treatment
Defining Justice
The concept of justice originates in the Greek word dike,
which refers to everything staying in its proper place.
Plato believed justice was achieved by maintaining the
social status quo. He classed it as one of the four civic
virtues (along with wisdom, temperance, and courage).
Aristotle believed justice was the basis of law, defining it as
the unwritten customs of a people that distinguish between
what is and is not honorable.
Aristotle’s Thoughts on Justice
Rectificatory (Commutative) Justice
• Called for in business where unfair advantage or
undeserved harm has occurred.
• Demands remedies or compensations to the injured
party.
Distributive Justice
• Concerns what measurement should be used to allocate
society's resources.
• Proportional equality: unequal people (e.g., slaves,
women) get unequal shares.
Major Components of Justice
Recognized Today
Distributive Justice
• Division of goods and
burdens among
members of a society.
Corrective Justice
• Determination and
methods of punishment.
• Punishment should fit
crime (concept of just
deserts).
Distributive Justice
Justice involves rightful possession of:
• Economic goods (income or property)
• Opportunities for development (education or
citizenship)
• Recognition (honor or status)
Since some possessions are scarce, justice requires that goods
be distributed using standards of entitlement such as need and
desert.
Possible Standards
for Distributive Justice
• Need
• Merit
• Performance
• Ability
• Rank
• Station
• Worth
• Work
• Agreements
• Requirements of
common good
• Valuation of services
• Legal entitlements
Theories of Distribution (I)
• Egalitarian Theories: Based on the premise of equality or equal
shares for all.
• Marxist Theories: Places need above rights.
• Libertarian Theories: Merit, entitlement, and productivity have
more weight than needs or equal shares.
• Utilitarian Theories: Attempt to maximize benefits for society by
balancing entitlement and needs.
• Rawls Theory: Any inequalities in a society should benefit the
least advantaged.
*** All have an equal right to basic shared liberties
Rawl’s Theory of Justice
• All inequalities in a society should benefit the
least advantaged.
• Social and economic inequalities should be
arranged to be to everyone's advantage.
• Decisions about distribution should be made
without regard to one’s status (the veil of
ignorance) because justice and fairness are in
everyone's rational self-interest.
Obamacare
- Example
of What
Type of
Justice?
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA)
• Signed into law by President Obama on March
23, 2010.
• Represents the most significant regulatory
overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since
1965.
• Aimed primarily at decreasing the number of
uninsured Americans and reducing the overall
costs of health care. It provides a number of
incentives to employers and uninsured
individuals in order to increase insurance
coverage.
• Requires insurance companies to cover all
applicants and offer the same rates regardless
of pre-existing conditions or gender.
• After mixed success in lower courts, on June
28, 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the
constitutionality of much of the Act.
Criticisms of Rawls
• The veil of ignorance cannot counteract
human selfishness and self-interest.
• Preferring the least well-off is bad for a
society; leads to lack of incentive, decline of
standards.
• Rawls’s approach to distribution ignores
desert and merit.
Occupy
Wall Street
Movement
-
Distributive
Justice?
• Occupy Wall Street claims to be a movement
that began on September 17, 2011 in
Manhattan’s Financial District.
• It has spread to over 100 cities in the U.S.
and actions in over 1,500 cities globally.
• It claims to be fighting back against the power
of banks and corporations over the
democratic process, and the role of Wall
Street in creating an economic collapse.
• This movement was allegedly inspired by
uprisings abroad, and aims to fight back
against the richest 1% that write the rules of
an unfair global economy.
• The occupations around the world are being
organized using a non-binding consensus
based collective decision making tool known
as a "people's assembly.”
Corrective Justice
Substantive Justice
• Based on the concept of just deserts
• Involves the determination of a “fair” punishment
Procedural Justice
• Based on the concept of law and rules
• Involves steps taken to determine guilt as well as
punishment
Two Philosophies of Justice
Retributive
Utilitarian
Retributive Justice
• Based on the concept of balance
• Perpetrator must suffer pain or loss proportional to the
victim’s (an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth)
• Lez talionis: a vengeance-oriented form of retributive
justice concerned with equal retaliation.
• Difficult to agree upon a fair degree of punishment in
situations that involve mitigating factors and partial
responsibility
• Difficult to measure the suffering or loss in incarceration
(most typical modern punishment)
Mercy
• Is separate from justice
• Tempers or “seasons” justice
• Is not an automatic right or matter of desert
• Derives its value from compassion
• Requires a generally retributive outlook on
punishment and responsibility
Mercy in
the
Criminal
Justice
System
• In 2012, Stewart Creekmore, 26, was sentenced
to17-years by a judge who accepted a plea
agreement reached by the Commonwealth and
defense.
• Police say Creekmore ran a red light and crashed
into a truck driven by Henry Bush in July 2010,
killing Bush. Creekmore's passenger and
girlfriend, Stefanie Oatman, lost the couple's 7-
month old fetus as a result of the crash.
• After all the Bush family has gone through, they
still showed Creekmore mercy. "I'm finding it in
my heart to do things right," said the victim's wife.
• Part of the plea agreement, Creekmore's charges
were reduced to manslaughter 2, fetal homicide,
assault, and DUI.
• Creekmore is already serving a 5-year sentence
for escape from the Montgomery County jail in
October 2010.
Utilitarian Justice
• Based on concept of “good for all”
• Justice requires punishment be for the greatest good.
• Bentham’s hedonistic calculus.
• Punishment is prescribed on the basis of perceived
deterrence.
• Treatment is acceptable because it supports
deterrence.
Trayvon
Martin Case
– Retributive
or Utilitarian
Justice?
• The fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin by George
Zimmerman took place on the night of 2/26/12 in
Florida.
• Martin was an unarmed 17-year-old black male.
George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old Hispanic
American, was the neighborhood watch captain
for a gated community where Martin was staying
& where the shooting took place. Zimmerman
noticed Martin acting suspiciously inside the
community. Zimmerman called the police
department to report Martin‘s behavior.
• During a fight, Zimmerman fatally shot Martin.
Zimmerman told police that Martin had attacked
him and that he had shot him in self-defense.
• Zimmerman was questioned for approximately 5
hours, then released.
• On 4/11/12, the prosecutor filed a charge of
murder in the 2nd
degree against Zimmerman.
• Outcome of case still pending.
20
Procedural Justice
Justice is the concept of fairness.
Law is a system of rules.
• Procedural justice consists of laws and
procedures meant to safeguard against error
in the application of justice.
• Due process exemplifies procedural justice.
Due Process Clauses
Article V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when
in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor
shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.
Article XIV, Section 1. All persons born or naturalized to the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Procedural Protections in the
U.S.
• Notice of charges
• Neutral hearing body (jury)
• Right of cross-examination
• Right to present evidence
• Representation by counsel
• Statement of findings
• Appeal of verdict
Who Deserves Due Process
Protections?
• Only citizens? (not illegal immigrants?)
• Only residents? (not Marielitos?)
• All those held against their will by this
government? (enemy combatants)
Habeas Corpus: ancient form of due
process
Thinking
Point
In April of 2010, Arizona Governor Jan
Brewer signed into law SB 1070, The
Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe
Neighborhoods Act. This law allows law
enforcement to require those who may
be illegal immigrants to provide
documentation of their residency status,
or face possible prosecution. Critics of
this law claim this is racial profiling at its
best.
Does this law infringe on basic
due process rights?
What type of justice does this law
exemplify?
Police
Racial
Profiling
Case
Officer Patrick Smith – LAPD
• A 2012 investigation into Patrick Smith, a 15-
year veteran who worked on a motorcycle in the
LAPD’s West Traffic Division, found that he was
stopping Latinos based on their ethnicity.
• Officer Smith is accused of misidentifying some
Latinos as being white on his reports —
presumably in an effort to conceal their ethnicity.
• LAPD Chief Beck reviewed the evidence against
Smith and he and his command staff
recommended Smith be found guilty. Beck
signed off on the investigation's findings and
ordered Smith sent to a disciplinary hearing,
where the department will attempt to have him
fired.
• In LA, the chief cannot fire an officer alone, but
instead must let a 3-person board decide if the
firing is warranted. The panel could also
exonerate Smith, who was relieved of duty
during the investigation.
Civil Disobedience
1. It must be nonviolent in form and actuality.
2. No other means of remedying the evil should be
available.
3. Those who resort to civil disobedience must accept the
legal sanctions and punishments imposed by law.
4. A major moral issue must be at stake.
5. When “intelligent men of good will” differ on complex
moral issues, discussion is more appropriate than action.
6. There must be some reason for the time, place and
target selected.
7. One should adhere to “historical time.”
Restorative Justice
• Emphasizes compensation over retribution.
• Returns focus to rights and needs of the victim.
• Requires restoration of victims, offenders, and
communities injured by crime.
• Integrates victims, offenders, and communities
more fully into the justice process.
• Leaves government responsible for order, but
makes community responsible for peace.
Community Justice Models
• Victim-offender mediation
• Community reparative boards
• Family group conferencing
• Circle sentencing

Pollock ethics 8e_ch03

  • 1.
    CHAPTER 3 Determining MoralBehavior Lecture slides prepared by Lisa J. Taylor
  • 2.
    Harold Hall’s Wrongful Conviction • Harold Hallwas wrongfully convicted in 1990 of a double homicide and rape. • He was sentenced to life in prison without parole. • In 2004, he was released after post- conviction DNA tests confirmed his innocence. • For 19 years, Hall spent his time reading everything he could, including magazines, newspapers and law books pertaining to advances in DNA identification technology and its uses in cases similar to his. • But the work paid off. In 2004, in addition to earning his GED, Hall got his sentence reversed and won his freedom.
  • 3.
    Justice • Fairness • Relatedto equal treatment • Equality • Refers to equal shares or treatment • Impartiality • Refers to the concept of equal treatment
  • 4.
    Defining Justice The conceptof justice originates in the Greek word dike, which refers to everything staying in its proper place. Plato believed justice was achieved by maintaining the social status quo. He classed it as one of the four civic virtues (along with wisdom, temperance, and courage). Aristotle believed justice was the basis of law, defining it as the unwritten customs of a people that distinguish between what is and is not honorable.
  • 5.
    Aristotle’s Thoughts onJustice Rectificatory (Commutative) Justice • Called for in business where unfair advantage or undeserved harm has occurred. • Demands remedies or compensations to the injured party. Distributive Justice • Concerns what measurement should be used to allocate society's resources. • Proportional equality: unequal people (e.g., slaves, women) get unequal shares.
  • 6.
    Major Components ofJustice Recognized Today Distributive Justice • Division of goods and burdens among members of a society. Corrective Justice • Determination and methods of punishment. • Punishment should fit crime (concept of just deserts).
  • 7.
    Distributive Justice Justice involvesrightful possession of: • Economic goods (income or property) • Opportunities for development (education or citizenship) • Recognition (honor or status) Since some possessions are scarce, justice requires that goods be distributed using standards of entitlement such as need and desert.
  • 8.
    Possible Standards for DistributiveJustice • Need • Merit • Performance • Ability • Rank • Station • Worth • Work • Agreements • Requirements of common good • Valuation of services • Legal entitlements
  • 9.
    Theories of Distribution(I) • Egalitarian Theories: Based on the premise of equality or equal shares for all. • Marxist Theories: Places need above rights. • Libertarian Theories: Merit, entitlement, and productivity have more weight than needs or equal shares. • Utilitarian Theories: Attempt to maximize benefits for society by balancing entitlement and needs. • Rawls Theory: Any inequalities in a society should benefit the least advantaged. *** All have an equal right to basic shared liberties
  • 10.
    Rawl’s Theory ofJustice • All inequalities in a society should benefit the least advantaged. • Social and economic inequalities should be arranged to be to everyone's advantage. • Decisions about distribution should be made without regard to one’s status (the veil of ignorance) because justice and fairness are in everyone's rational self-interest.
  • 11.
    Obamacare - Example of What Typeof Justice? Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) • Signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010. • Represents the most significant regulatory overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since 1965. • Aimed primarily at decreasing the number of uninsured Americans and reducing the overall costs of health care. It provides a number of incentives to employers and uninsured individuals in order to increase insurance coverage. • Requires insurance companies to cover all applicants and offer the same rates regardless of pre-existing conditions or gender. • After mixed success in lower courts, on June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of much of the Act.
  • 12.
    Criticisms of Rawls •The veil of ignorance cannot counteract human selfishness and self-interest. • Preferring the least well-off is bad for a society; leads to lack of incentive, decline of standards. • Rawls’s approach to distribution ignores desert and merit.
  • 13.
    Occupy Wall Street Movement - Distributive Justice? • OccupyWall Street claims to be a movement that began on September 17, 2011 in Manhattan’s Financial District. • It has spread to over 100 cities in the U.S. and actions in over 1,500 cities globally. • It claims to be fighting back against the power of banks and corporations over the democratic process, and the role of Wall Street in creating an economic collapse. • This movement was allegedly inspired by uprisings abroad, and aims to fight back against the richest 1% that write the rules of an unfair global economy. • The occupations around the world are being organized using a non-binding consensus based collective decision making tool known as a "people's assembly.”
  • 14.
    Corrective Justice Substantive Justice •Based on the concept of just deserts • Involves the determination of a “fair” punishment Procedural Justice • Based on the concept of law and rules • Involves steps taken to determine guilt as well as punishment
  • 15.
    Two Philosophies ofJustice Retributive Utilitarian
  • 16.
    Retributive Justice • Basedon the concept of balance • Perpetrator must suffer pain or loss proportional to the victim’s (an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth) • Lez talionis: a vengeance-oriented form of retributive justice concerned with equal retaliation. • Difficult to agree upon a fair degree of punishment in situations that involve mitigating factors and partial responsibility • Difficult to measure the suffering or loss in incarceration (most typical modern punishment)
  • 17.
    Mercy • Is separatefrom justice • Tempers or “seasons” justice • Is not an automatic right or matter of desert • Derives its value from compassion • Requires a generally retributive outlook on punishment and responsibility
  • 18.
    Mercy in the Criminal Justice System • In2012, Stewart Creekmore, 26, was sentenced to17-years by a judge who accepted a plea agreement reached by the Commonwealth and defense. • Police say Creekmore ran a red light and crashed into a truck driven by Henry Bush in July 2010, killing Bush. Creekmore's passenger and girlfriend, Stefanie Oatman, lost the couple's 7- month old fetus as a result of the crash. • After all the Bush family has gone through, they still showed Creekmore mercy. "I'm finding it in my heart to do things right," said the victim's wife. • Part of the plea agreement, Creekmore's charges were reduced to manslaughter 2, fetal homicide, assault, and DUI. • Creekmore is already serving a 5-year sentence for escape from the Montgomery County jail in October 2010.
  • 19.
    Utilitarian Justice • Basedon concept of “good for all” • Justice requires punishment be for the greatest good. • Bentham’s hedonistic calculus. • Punishment is prescribed on the basis of perceived deterrence. • Treatment is acceptable because it supports deterrence.
  • 20.
    Trayvon Martin Case – Retributive orUtilitarian Justice? • The fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman took place on the night of 2/26/12 in Florida. • Martin was an unarmed 17-year-old black male. George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old Hispanic American, was the neighborhood watch captain for a gated community where Martin was staying & where the shooting took place. Zimmerman noticed Martin acting suspiciously inside the community. Zimmerman called the police department to report Martin‘s behavior. • During a fight, Zimmerman fatally shot Martin. Zimmerman told police that Martin had attacked him and that he had shot him in self-defense. • Zimmerman was questioned for approximately 5 hours, then released. • On 4/11/12, the prosecutor filed a charge of murder in the 2nd degree against Zimmerman. • Outcome of case still pending. 20
  • 21.
    Procedural Justice Justice isthe concept of fairness. Law is a system of rules. • Procedural justice consists of laws and procedures meant to safeguard against error in the application of justice. • Due process exemplifies procedural justice.
  • 22.
    Due Process Clauses ArticleV. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Article XIV, Section 1. All persons born or naturalized to the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • 23.
    Procedural Protections inthe U.S. • Notice of charges • Neutral hearing body (jury) • Right of cross-examination • Right to present evidence • Representation by counsel • Statement of findings • Appeal of verdict
  • 24.
    Who Deserves DueProcess Protections? • Only citizens? (not illegal immigrants?) • Only residents? (not Marielitos?) • All those held against their will by this government? (enemy combatants) Habeas Corpus: ancient form of due process
  • 25.
    Thinking Point In April of2010, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law SB 1070, The Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act. This law allows law enforcement to require those who may be illegal immigrants to provide documentation of their residency status, or face possible prosecution. Critics of this law claim this is racial profiling at its best. Does this law infringe on basic due process rights? What type of justice does this law exemplify?
  • 26.
    Police Racial Profiling Case Officer Patrick Smith– LAPD • A 2012 investigation into Patrick Smith, a 15- year veteran who worked on a motorcycle in the LAPD’s West Traffic Division, found that he was stopping Latinos based on their ethnicity. • Officer Smith is accused of misidentifying some Latinos as being white on his reports — presumably in an effort to conceal their ethnicity. • LAPD Chief Beck reviewed the evidence against Smith and he and his command staff recommended Smith be found guilty. Beck signed off on the investigation's findings and ordered Smith sent to a disciplinary hearing, where the department will attempt to have him fired. • In LA, the chief cannot fire an officer alone, but instead must let a 3-person board decide if the firing is warranted. The panel could also exonerate Smith, who was relieved of duty during the investigation.
  • 27.
    Civil Disobedience 1. Itmust be nonviolent in form and actuality. 2. No other means of remedying the evil should be available. 3. Those who resort to civil disobedience must accept the legal sanctions and punishments imposed by law. 4. A major moral issue must be at stake. 5. When “intelligent men of good will” differ on complex moral issues, discussion is more appropriate than action. 6. There must be some reason for the time, place and target selected. 7. One should adhere to “historical time.”
  • 28.
    Restorative Justice • Emphasizescompensation over retribution. • Returns focus to rights and needs of the victim. • Requires restoration of victims, offenders, and communities injured by crime. • Integrates victims, offenders, and communities more fully into the justice process. • Leaves government responsible for order, but makes community responsible for peace.
  • 29.
    Community Justice Models •Victim-offender mediation • Community reparative boards • Family group conferencing • Circle sentencing

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Review article regarding Harold Hall’s arrest, trial, conviction, and exoneration - http://www.dailybruin.com/index.php/article/2006/04/exonerated-prisoners-put-a-fac?&cp=1 Did the justice system work in this case? Did Harold Hall receive justice? Discuss the adage, “justice delayed is justice denied.”
  • #9 Click to add notes
  • #12 Review entire synopsis of Obamacare at - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act Is Obamacare a type of distributive justice? Have class discuss why or why not. Discuss whether class members feel this law is appropriate. Which theory does Obamacare most align with?
  • #14 Review the following website on the Wall Street Movement - http://occupywallst.org/about/ Has Occupy Wall Street made strides in global changes regarding the power of banks and multinational corporations? Discuss local Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. Is this a form of distributive justice? Which political party most aligns itself with this concept?
  • #17 Discuss whether this type of justice has biblical roots.
  • #19 Review the following website on the mercy - http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Victims_family_shows_driver_mercy_in_deadly_crash_148961825.html Discuss whether Mr. Creekmore received the appropriate sentence for his crime. Should family’s thoughts/feelings be considered in sentencing?
  • #21 Review the timeline of events regarding this case at - http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/12/justice/florida-zimmerman-timeline/index.html Is this an example of retributive justice? Why did this case garner so much national and international attention? Discuss Florida’s “Stand your Ground” law. Discuss potential motivations of Zimmerman, the police, the media, Martin’s family. Have class discuss potential outcomes of this case and the ramifications of those outcomes.
  • #24 Click to add notes
  • #25 Click to add notes
  • #27 Review the following article - http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/27/local/la-me-lapd-racial-profile-20120326 If found guilty, was Officer Smith acting ethically? Were Officer Smiths “victims” discriminated against? If so, how? Discuss potential criminal charges that could be lodged against Officer Smith What could the ramifications be to both the officer and the department if Officer Smith is found guilty? Have Officer Smith’s “victims,” perhaps had their rights violated?
  • #28 Click to add notes
  • #29 Click to add notes
  • #30 Click to add notes