This powerpoint was made in the fall of 2019. It describes the basic setup of the US government (the branches set up in the constitution). It touches on how a president can be impeached and how the (then current) impeachment of Trump was progressing.
"Marriage Equality and Religious Exemption Act"-[same sex marriage act]Lawrence Berezin
A Chronology of Events from 2006 to present.
There has been a lot of tumult beginning with the N.J. Supreme Court decision in Lewis v. Harris, and leading to the present fight expected on the floors of the N.J. Assembly and Senate.
Do you think this Bill will pass both houses of the N.J. Legislature? Will Gov. Christie make good on his threat to veto the Bill? Will it be added to the ballet in November 2012?
"The International Affair" LA Lawyer Magazine -Feature Article - Immigration ...Heather Poole
Feature article discussing the legal intersection between federal immigration law and California family law, the limits to immigration sponsorship, the validity of divorce and marriage for federal immigration law purposes when it conflicts with CA law, and more. Los Angeles Lawyer Article June 2012 - by Immigration Attorney Heather Poole
"Marriage Equality and Religious Exemption Act"-[same sex marriage act]Lawrence Berezin
A Chronology of Events from 2006 to present.
There has been a lot of tumult beginning with the N.J. Supreme Court decision in Lewis v. Harris, and leading to the present fight expected on the floors of the N.J. Assembly and Senate.
Do you think this Bill will pass both houses of the N.J. Legislature? Will Gov. Christie make good on his threat to veto the Bill? Will it be added to the ballet in November 2012?
"The International Affair" LA Lawyer Magazine -Feature Article - Immigration ...Heather Poole
Feature article discussing the legal intersection between federal immigration law and California family law, the limits to immigration sponsorship, the validity of divorce and marriage for federal immigration law purposes when it conflicts with CA law, and more. Los Angeles Lawyer Article June 2012 - by Immigration Attorney Heather Poole
When Checks and Balances FailIn February 2017, Dr. Christopher Dvictorring
When Checks and Balances Fail
In February 2017, Dr. Christopher Duntsch became the first surgeon in American history known to be sentenced to prison for botching a patient surgery. A licensed neurosurgeon, Duntsch left a string of deaths and maimed bodies in his wake: He was accused of causing the death of two surgery patients and leaving 33 others permanently damaged. His patients left their lives in his hands; he left them paralyzed or dead.
The checks and balances that were supposed to contain Duntsch failed utterly. His medical school licensed him but didn't require the preparation necessary to instill competence. Hospitals suspended him but didn't report him. The medical board could do nothing without forms filed against him. Patients were left without recourse.
When checks and balances fail, damage is usually the result.
That's why when it came to our system of government, the founders were so focused on creating gridlock. They recognized that in a system in which legitimacy sprang from popular support, the easy path to perdition lay in popularly backed centralized power -- tyranny could spring just as easily from a popular majority as from a king or despot. The founders didn't trust individuals with authority, and they didn't trust human beings to delegate authority to mere individuals.
But popular governments have always bucked against such limitations.
The majority of Americans always want action, on some grounds or others. That leads to an eternal drive to grant unchecked power to some institution of government. As Alexis de Tocqueville writes in his 1840 "Democracy in America": "It may easily be foreseen that almost all the able and ambitious members of a democratic community will labor without ceasing to extend the powers of government, because they all hope at some time or other to wield those powers. ... Centralization will be the natural government."
We're now seeing the consequences of such centralization on two separate fronts: the president's authority to declare a national emergency and the FBI's investigations into the president. Proponents of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the presidency; antagonists of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the FBI.
President Trump's allies seem eager for Trump to declare a national emergency in order to appropriate funds for a border wall. The law cuts against such a declaration: The National Emergencies Act was written to curtail presidential authority, not increase it. No matter how much border hawks (including me) want a border barrier, the proper method is to request funds from Congress.
Meanwhile, President Trump's enemies are celebrating reports this week that the FBI investigated Trump as a possible Russian agent after his firing of then-FBI director James Comey. Trump had authority under the Constitution to fire Comey, and there's no actual evidence that Trump is an agent of the Russians. But Trump's enemies want the legislature ...
From Baylor Law "Peoples Law School" February 9, 2019 presentation by David Schleicher. Some of the later slides involve items for discussion as to whether particular findings would be likely or not to garner a 2/3rds vote for conviction in the Senate. Earlier slides cover rules governing Special Counsel. If any questions or comments, David's email is david@gov.law
18 Congressional Digest n www.CongressionalDigest.com n Juncargillfilberto
18 Congressional Digest n www.CongressionalDigest.com n June 2020
“. . . the Electoral
College . . . no
longer fits our
nation’s needs.”
Continued on page 20
The Pros and
the Electoral
Should the United States change the way it elects presidents?
Honorable Steve Cohen
United States Representative, Tennessee, Democrat
Rep. Cohen, of Tennessee’s Ninth Congressional District, was elected to the U.S. House
of Representatives in 2006. Prior to his election to Congress, he served in the Tennessee
State Senate for 24 years. He has been a leader on numerous legislative issues including
civil rights, universal health care, transportation and education. Currently he is a mem-
ber of the following House committees: Judiciary; Transportation and Infrastructure;
and Science, Space and Technology. The following is from his Jan. 3, 2019, statement
introducing a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Electoral College.
Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of a constitutional amendment I introduced
today to eliminate the electoral college and provide for the direct election of our
nation’s President and Vice President.
As Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said, “I am not an advocate for frequent
changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with
the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened,
as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change,
with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with
the times. We might well as require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him
when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous
ancestors.’’
In 2016, for the second time in recent memory, and for the fifth time in our history,
the national popular vote winner did not become President because of the Electoral
College. This has happened twice to candidates from Tennessee: Al Gore and An-
drew Jackson. The reason is because the Electoral College, established to prevent an
uninformed citizenry from directly electing our nation’s President, no longer fits our
nation’s needs.
When the Founders established the Electoral College, it was in an era of limited
nationwide communication. The electoral structure was premised on a theory that
citizens would have a better chance of knowing about electors from their home states
than about presidential candidates from out-of-state. Electors were supposed to be
people of good judgment who were trusted with picking a qualified President and Vice
President on behalf of the people. They held the responsibility of choosing a President
because it was believed that the general public could not be properly informed of the
candidates and the values each held.
That notion — that citizens should be prevented from directly electing the Pres-
ident — is antithetical to our understanding of democra ...
18 Congressional Digest n www.CongressionalDigest.com n Jun.docxRAJU852744
18 Congressional Digest n www.CongressionalDigest.com n June 2020
“. . . the Electoral
College . . . no
longer fits our
nation’s needs.”
Continued on page 20
The Pros and
the Electoral
Should the United States change the way it elects presidents?
Honorable Steve Cohen
United States Representative, Tennessee, Democrat
Rep. Cohen, of Tennessee’s Ninth Congressional District, was elected to the U.S. House
of Representatives in 2006. Prior to his election to Congress, he served in the Tennessee
State Senate for 24 years. He has been a leader on numerous legislative issues including
civil rights, universal health care, transportation and education. Currently he is a mem-
ber of the following House committees: Judiciary; Transportation and Infrastructure;
and Science, Space and Technology. The following is from his Jan. 3, 2019, statement
introducing a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Electoral College.
Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of a constitutional amendment I introduced
today to eliminate the electoral college and provide for the direct election of our
nation’s President and Vice President.
As Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said, “I am not an advocate for frequent
changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with
the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened,
as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change,
with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with
the times. We might well as require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him
when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous
ancestors.’’
In 2016, for the second time in recent memory, and for the fifth time in our history,
the national popular vote winner did not become President because of the Electoral
College. This has happened twice to candidates from Tennessee: Al Gore and An-
drew Jackson. The reason is because the Electoral College, established to prevent an
uninformed citizenry from directly electing our nation’s President, no longer fits our
nation’s needs.
When the Founders established the Electoral College, it was in an era of limited
nationwide communication. The electoral structure was premised on a theory that
citizens would have a better chance of knowing about electors from their home states
than about presidential candidates from out-of-state. Electors were supposed to be
people of good judgment who were trusted with picking a qualified President and Vice
President on behalf of the people. They held the responsibility of choosing a President
because it was believed that the general public could not be properly informed of the
candidates and the values each held.
That notion — that citizens should be prevented from directly electing the Pres-
ident — is antithetical to our understanding of democra.
Slideshow prepared for a series of lectures on the U.S. Presidency for PS 101 American Government at the University of Kentucky, Spring 2008. Dr. Christopher S. Rice, Lecturer.
Controversies during the administration of President John Adams, including the Alien and Sedition Acts and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions
For more PowerPoint presentations and instructional materials, visit www.tomrichey.net!
This PPT shows the vocabulary word then the definition on the next slide. the vocabulary is words associated with the LGBTQ community. The game was designed for English-learners in 5th-6th grade, with an A1-A2 level of English.
This presentation follows the structure of a Gender Stereotypes lesson found on GLSEN.org. It is not in itself a lesson, it just provides a flow to the lesson. The full lesson plan is here: https://www.glsen.org/activity/thats-gender-stereotype
This presentation discusses the history of Thanksgiving in the USA and address some false misconseptions. It talks about what we do in modern times to celebrate the holiday.
This was shown to 6th graders. It shows them what they slides they will have to make and then provides an example presentation of the digestive system.
Made for Spanish primary school 5th years, this is unit 2 vocabulary (camping/outdoor activities) from their English book and a review of the question words (who, what, when, where, why, how)
This is a presentation I made for Spanish primary students at a bilingual school, learning English. The goal of the presentation was to introduce what stereotypes are and why they are harmful, then connecting that information to the racially charged harm that is happening to people of Asian descent right now (2020) due to coronavirus. This was to get the primary students to question hateful comments and reduce their prejudice.
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Congress has the authority to declare war
President has the power to veto it
President can declare a national emergency
Congress has the authority to declare war
President has the power to veto it
President can declare a national emergency
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities
The Senate holds a trial
Impeachment at the federal level is limited to those who may have committed "Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors
Congress has the power to impeach a president
United States impeachment is only the first of two stages, and conviction during the second stage requires "the concurrence of two thirds of the members present”
Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges
Second legislative vote which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment
Conviction in the Senate requires a two-thirds supermajority vote of those present
Conviction immediately removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him or her from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction does not extend to further punishment, for example, loss of pension. After conviction by the Senate, "the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" in the regular federal or state courts.
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities
The Senate holds a trial
Impeachment at the federal level is limited to those who may have committed "Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors
Congress has the power to impeach a president
United States impeachment is only the first of two stages, and conviction during the second stage requires "the concurrence of two thirds of the members present”
Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges
Second legislative vote which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment
Conviction in the Senate requires a two-thirds supermajority vote of those present
Conviction immediately removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him or her from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction does not extend to further punishment, for example, loss of pension. After conviction by the Senate, "the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" in the regular federal or state courts.
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities
The Senate holds a trial
Impeachment at the federal level is limited to those who may have committed "Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors
Congress has the power to impeach a president
United States impeachment is only the first of two stages, and conviction during the second stage requires "the concurrence of two thirds of the members present”
Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges
Second legislative vote which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment
Conviction in the Senate requires a two-thirds supermajority vote of those present
Conviction immediately removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him or her from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction does not extend to further punishment, for example, loss of pension. After conviction by the Senate, "the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" in the regular federal or state courts.
15 federal judges impeached by the House, two Presidents (Andrew Johnson in 1868 and William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton in 1998), a cabinet secretary (William Belknap in 1876), and a U.S. Senator (William Blount of North Carolina in 1797) have also been impeached.
15 federal judges impeached by the House, two Presidents (Andrew Johnson in 1868 and William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton in 1998), a cabinet secretary (William Belknap in 1876), and a U.S. Senator (William Blount of North Carolina in 1797) have also been impeached.
15 federal judges impeached by the House, two Presidents (Andrew Johnson in 1868 and William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton in 1998), a cabinet secretary (William Belknap in 1876), and a U.S. Senator (William Blount of North Carolina in 1797) have also been impeached.
15 federal judges impeached by the House, two Presidents (Andrew Johnson in 1868 and William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton in 1998), a cabinet secretary (William Belknap in 1876), and a U.S. Senator (William Blount of North Carolina in 1797) have also been impeached.
15 federal judges impeached by the House, two Presidents (Andrew Johnson in 1868 and William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton in 1998), a cabinet secretary (William Belknap in 1876), and a U.S. Senator (William Blount of North Carolina in 1797) have also been impeached.