SlideShare a Scribd company logo
By Jonathan Mazzella

-Bush v. Gore
-Dredd Scott v. Sanford
-Mcculloch v. Maryland
Plaintiff Arguments
 George

Bush and the Republican
party claimed that they had won
the state of Florida therefor
winning the election.
 Bush complained also that the
recount of the votes undermined
the 14th amendment of the
constitution.
Defendant Arguments
Al Gore and the Democratice party
believed they had won the state of
Florida and the election
 Al Gore demanded a recount of the
votes, because he felt that it was unfair
to bas who had won off of a state
election that was not properly counted.

Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor
of Bush and the Republican party.
 The recount of the votes had violated
the 14th amendment of the Constitution
which “requires the federal government
to respect, maintain and uphold the legal
rights of American citizens.
Governments in the United States are
not allowed to infringe on the civil rights
and liberties of its people”

Plaintiff Arguments
Dredd Scott believed that he should be
a free man because his owner moved to
a free state but then died.
 He claimed that since he was left in a
free state when his owner died he
should have a right to freedom.
 Dredd Scott had his freedom for a short
period of time and when he was
reclaimed he tried for his freedom again.

Defendant Arguments


John Sanford (who represented
Emerson) said that since Dredd Scott
belonged to Emerson he should be
given to another member of the family
since he was only “property”
Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
Congress did not have the right to
declare states as “free states”
 They also ruled that Dredd Scott was
only considered property and that he
belonged to Sanford.

Plaintiff Arguments
McCulloch, the manager of a federal
bank in Maryland did not believe that the
state of Maryland had the right to tax a
federal bank.
 He thought that since it was a branch of
the government that they should not
have to pay state taxes.

Defendant Arguments
The state of Maryland claimed that since
the Bank was on Maryland territory,
using Maryland’s resources, and
Maryland’s money, that they should
have to pay taxes.
 They did not think being a branch of the
government had anything to do with
taxation.

Verdict
The Supreme Court ruled the following:
 Firstly, the Congress of the United States is
granted for certain implied powers by the
Constitution that are implemented in order
to ensure for the proper function of the
Federal Government.
 The other major outcome was that the
States cannot impose on the powers
granted by the Constitution to the Federal
Government by any action, such as levying
a bank tax on a national bank.


More Related Content

What's hot

Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtssevans-idaho
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
lisajurs
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
mpalaro
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2 Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
mpalaro
 
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final WordChapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
lisajurs
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
mpalaro
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
mpalaro
 
Troublewithnormal
TroublewithnormalTroublewithnormal
Troublewithnormalguestc31971
 
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal SystemChapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
lisajurs
 
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex MarriageNews Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
Annette Wright, GBA, GBDS
 
Civics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment projectCivics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment projectjchen18
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
bbennett
 
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit californiaArticle assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Wayne Williams
 

What's hot (19)

Perry Op Ed
Perry Op EdPerry Op Ed
Perry Op Ed
 
Doma faq
Doma faqDoma faq
Doma faq
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courts
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2 Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final WordChapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
 
Troublewithnormal
TroublewithnormalTroublewithnormal
Troublewithnormal
 
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal SystemChapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
 
ap gov chap 6
ap gov chap 6ap gov chap 6
ap gov chap 6
 
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex MarriageNews Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
 
Civics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment projectCivics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment project
 
normal
normalnormal
normal
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
 
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit californiaArticle assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
 

Similar to Landmark Case Decisions

Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Brandon L. Blankenship
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchdficker
 
The six principles of government
The six principles of governmentThe six principles of government
The six principles of governmentCham216
 
1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt
bravogths
 
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.pptdownload56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
LalitJaiswal12
 
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure ProceedingA Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
Karen Gilchrist
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfanomikealfano49
 
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case StudyCo-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Winstina Kennedy
 
Marbury vs Madison
Marbury vs MadisonMarbury vs Madison
Marbury vs Madison
Judy Fourie
 
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Nancy Yanira Munoz Martinez
 
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docxEssay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
SALU18
 
Academic government reading
Academic government readingAcademic government reading
Academic government reading
Fredrick Smith
 
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional CourtsThe Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
Melissa Luster
 
Power Point
Power PointPower Point
Power Pointzmiller
 

Similar to Landmark Case Decisions (17)

Us court cases cbl
Us court cases cbl Us court cases cbl
Us court cases cbl
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
Part b
Part bPart b
Part b
 
The six principles of government
The six principles of governmentThe six principles of government
The six principles of government
 
1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt
 
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.pptdownload56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
 
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure ProceedingA Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
 
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case StudyCo-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
 
Marbury vs Madison
Marbury vs MadisonMarbury vs Madison
Marbury vs Madison
 
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
 
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docxEssay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
 
Academic government reading
Academic government readingAcademic government reading
Academic government reading
 
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional CourtsThe Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
 
Power Point
Power PointPower Point
Power Point
 
11th Amendment
11th Amendment11th Amendment
11th Amendment
 

Recently uploaded

2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
olaola5673
 
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdfSharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
bhavenpr
 
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdfResolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
bhavenpr
 
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptxCodes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
ZackSpencer3
 
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
role of women and girls in various terror groups
role of women and girls in various terror groupsrole of women and girls in various terror groups
role of women and girls in various terror groups
sadiakorobi2
 
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptxDo Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
Slator- Language Industry Intelligence
 
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdfDraft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
bhavenpr
 
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returnedHogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
rbakerj2
 
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest TrendsAI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
CI kumparan
 
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin community
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin communityPreview of Court Document for Iseyin community
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin community
contact193699
 

Recently uploaded (13)

2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
2024 is the point of certainty. Forecast of UIF experts
 
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdfSharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
Sharjeel-Imam-Judgement-CRLA-215-2024_29-05-2024.pdf
 
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdfResolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
Resolutions-Key-Interventions-28-May-2024.pdf
 
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptxCodes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
Codes n Conventionss copy (1).paaaaaaptx
 
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
role of women and girls in various terror groups
role of women and girls in various terror groupsrole of women and girls in various terror groups
role of women and girls in various terror groups
 
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptxDo Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models.pptx
 
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdfDraft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
Draft-1-Resolutions-Key-Interventions-.pdf
 
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returnedHogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
 
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest TrendsAI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
AI and Covert Influence Operations: Latest Trends
 
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin community
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin communityPreview of Court Document for Iseyin community
Preview of Court Document for Iseyin community
 

Landmark Case Decisions

  • 1. By Jonathan Mazzella -Bush v. Gore -Dredd Scott v. Sanford -Mcculloch v. Maryland
  • 2.
  • 3. Plaintiff Arguments  George Bush and the Republican party claimed that they had won the state of Florida therefor winning the election.  Bush complained also that the recount of the votes undermined the 14th amendment of the constitution.
  • 4. Defendant Arguments Al Gore and the Democratice party believed they had won the state of Florida and the election  Al Gore demanded a recount of the votes, because he felt that it was unfair to bas who had won off of a state election that was not properly counted. 
  • 5. Verdict The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bush and the Republican party.  The recount of the votes had violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution which “requires the federal government to respect, maintain and uphold the legal rights of American citizens. Governments in the United States are not allowed to infringe on the civil rights and liberties of its people” 
  • 6.
  • 7. Plaintiff Arguments Dredd Scott believed that he should be a free man because his owner moved to a free state but then died.  He claimed that since he was left in a free state when his owner died he should have a right to freedom.  Dredd Scott had his freedom for a short period of time and when he was reclaimed he tried for his freedom again. 
  • 8. Defendant Arguments  John Sanford (who represented Emerson) said that since Dredd Scott belonged to Emerson he should be given to another member of the family since he was only “property”
  • 9. Verdict The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have the right to declare states as “free states”  They also ruled that Dredd Scott was only considered property and that he belonged to Sanford. 
  • 10.
  • 11. Plaintiff Arguments McCulloch, the manager of a federal bank in Maryland did not believe that the state of Maryland had the right to tax a federal bank.  He thought that since it was a branch of the government that they should not have to pay state taxes. 
  • 12. Defendant Arguments The state of Maryland claimed that since the Bank was on Maryland territory, using Maryland’s resources, and Maryland’s money, that they should have to pay taxes.  They did not think being a branch of the government had anything to do with taxation. 
  • 13. Verdict The Supreme Court ruled the following:  Firstly, the Congress of the United States is granted for certain implied powers by the Constitution that are implemented in order to ensure for the proper function of the Federal Government.  The other major outcome was that the States cannot impose on the powers granted by the Constitution to the Federal Government by any action, such as levying a bank tax on a national bank. 