This document summarizes three Supreme Court cases:
- Bush v. Gore ruled in favor of Bush, finding that the Florida recount violated the 14th Amendment.
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford ruled that Congress couldn't declare states free and that Dredd Scott was the property of Sanford.
- McCulloch v. Maryland ruled that the federal government has implied constitutional powers and states cannot tax federal institutions.
National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Article Assignment Nullification by S...Wayne Williams
Article Assignment; Students will read the article on nullification and how South Carolina is pushing back against the NDAA 2012 using the 10th Amendment.
National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Article Assignment Nullification by S...Wayne Williams
Article Assignment; Students will read the article on nullification and how South Carolina is pushing back against the NDAA 2012 using the 10th Amendment.
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex MarriageAnnette Wright, GBA, GBDS
On January 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States announced that it will take up the issue whether persons of the same gender have the right to marry under the U.S. Constitution.
I presented this presentation to the Fatih University in Istanbul Turkey. I discussed why the American legal system is unique by giving the history behind our government and laws.
The American Experiment to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" fleshing out through 14th Amendment, historical context, privileges and immunities clause, citizenship clause, equal protection clause, and due process clause. Illustrated through Gore v. Bush.
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex MarriageAnnette Wright, GBA, GBDS
On January 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States announced that it will take up the issue whether persons of the same gender have the right to marry under the U.S. Constitution.
I presented this presentation to the Fatih University in Istanbul Turkey. I discussed why the American legal system is unique by giving the history behind our government and laws.
The American Experiment to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" fleshing out through 14th Amendment, historical context, privileges and immunities clause, citizenship clause, equal protection clause, and due process clause. Illustrated through Gore v. Bush.
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docxSALU18
Essay 4: Argument
Background:
In 2014, President Barack Obama signed 12 executive orders directing various agencies in the departments of State, Justice, and Homeland Security to refrain from deporting some 4 million adult immigrants illegally present in the United States if they are the parents of children born here or legally present here, and if they hold a job, obtain a high-school diploma or its equivalent, pay taxes, and stay out of prison. However, for the president Congress had rejected the conditions he established for avoiding deportation. In response to the executive orders, 26 states and the House of Representatives sued the president and the recipients of the orders, seeking to prevent them from being enforced. The States and the House argued that the president effectively rewrote the immigration laws and changed the standards for the deportation of unlawfully present adult immigrants.
The states also argued that because federal law requires them to offer the same safety net of social services for those illegally present as they do for those lawfully present, the financial burden that the enforcement of those orders would put upon them would be far beyond their budgetary limits. Moreover, they argued, enforcement of the president’s orders would effectively constitute a presidential command to the states to spend their own tax dollars against their wishes, and the president lacks the power to do that. In reply, the president argued that the literal enforcement of the law creates an impossible conundrum for him. He does not want to deport the parents of American children, as that destroys families and impairs the welfare of children, and he cannot deport children who were born here, as they are American citizens. The case was filed in Texas, where a federal district court judge agreed with the states and signed an order that prohibited the feds from enforcing the president’s orders, pending a full trial. The feds appealed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans upheld the injunction against the president. In so doing, it agreed with the states that the financial burden on them that would come from the enforcement of these executive orders would be unconstitutional. It also agreed with the House of Representatives that the president exceeded his authority under the Constitution and effectively rewrote the laws. In early April 2016, the Supreme Court heard the feds’ appeal. Because the seat formerly occupied by the late Justice Antonin Scalia for 30 years is still vacant, the court has just eight justices -- for the most part, four conservatives and four liberals. A tie vote in the court, which appears likely in this case, will not set any precedent, but it will retain the injunction against the president.
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, says that the most recent time this happened was 1952, when the court enjoined President Harry Truman from seizing steel mills during ...
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
3. Plaintiff Arguments
George
Bush and the Republican
party claimed that they had won
the state of Florida therefor
winning the election.
Bush complained also that the
recount of the votes undermined
the 14th amendment of the
constitution.
4. Defendant Arguments
Al Gore and the Democratice party
believed they had won the state of
Florida and the election
Al Gore demanded a recount of the
votes, because he felt that it was unfair
to bas who had won off of a state
election that was not properly counted.
5. Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor
of Bush and the Republican party.
The recount of the votes had violated
the 14th amendment of the Constitution
which “requires the federal government
to respect, maintain and uphold the legal
rights of American citizens.
Governments in the United States are
not allowed to infringe on the civil rights
and liberties of its people”
6.
7. Plaintiff Arguments
Dredd Scott believed that he should be
a free man because his owner moved to
a free state but then died.
He claimed that since he was left in a
free state when his owner died he
should have a right to freedom.
Dredd Scott had his freedom for a short
period of time and when he was
reclaimed he tried for his freedom again.
8. Defendant Arguments
John Sanford (who represented
Emerson) said that since Dredd Scott
belonged to Emerson he should be
given to another member of the family
since he was only “property”
9. Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
Congress did not have the right to
declare states as “free states”
They also ruled that Dredd Scott was
only considered property and that he
belonged to Sanford.
10.
11. Plaintiff Arguments
McCulloch, the manager of a federal
bank in Maryland did not believe that the
state of Maryland had the right to tax a
federal bank.
He thought that since it was a branch of
the government that they should not
have to pay state taxes.
12. Defendant Arguments
The state of Maryland claimed that since
the Bank was on Maryland territory,
using Maryland’s resources, and
Maryland’s money, that they should
have to pay taxes.
They did not think being a branch of the
government had anything to do with
taxation.
13. Verdict
The Supreme Court ruled the following:
Firstly, the Congress of the United States is
granted for certain implied powers by the
Constitution that are implemented in order
to ensure for the proper function of the
Federal Government.
The other major outcome was that the
States cannot impose on the powers
granted by the Constitution to the Federal
Government by any action, such as levying
a bank tax on a national bank.