Pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng

OGX Petróleo e Gás Participações
S.A., Subsidiaries & Affiliates
MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE PG.OG.SMS.018
Title:
Mechanical Integrity
Issued on: 04/May/12 Version 01
Prepared by:
Alter Azevedo
SSO Engineer
Revised by:
Hegel Bernardes
SSO Manager
Approved by:
Reinaldo Belotti
Develop. and Production Director
Page 1 of 17
SUMMARY
The purpose of this procedure is to set up the conditions that will allow the performance of
inspections, tests, repairs and maintenance, taking into consideration the equipment
deterioration mechanisms, trying to preserve their integrity and reliability.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 – Objective: 3
2 – Application and Scope: 3
3 – References: 3
4 – Definitions and Acronyms: 3
5 – Responsibilities: 4
6 – Assumptions: 4
7 – Records: 6
8 – Annexes: 6
The content of this procedure must be disclosed to all employees.
Requests for clarification should be sent to the Operational Health and Safety by e-mail
addressed to alter.azevedo@ogx.com.br

Title:
Prepared by:
Alter Azevedo
SSO Engineer
Revised by:
Hegel Bernardes
SSO Manager
Approved by:
Reinaldo Belotti
Page 2 of 17
REVISION/ISSUE CONTROL
Issue Version Date Topics
Type
(I / E / A / N)
Summary of changes
2012 01 04/May/12 NA N Establishment of the procedure
REVISION RECORD CODE – TYPE OF CHANGE
Acronym Description
I Inclusion: New information was added.
E Exclusion: Information excluded from prior version.
A Change or adjustment to information existing in the previous version.
N New: Shows procedure establishment date, corresponding to document 1st version.
Additional Information: (Field for comments or guidance for next revision or specific issues related to procedure subject
matter).

Title:
Prepared by:
Alter Azevedo
SSO Engineer
Revised by:
Hegel Bernardes
SSO Manager
Approved by:
Reinaldo Belotti
Page 3 of 17
1 – Objective:
The objective of this procedure is to establish, in a planned and systematic manner, the
requirements to be applied by Operational Safety Management System (SGSO) to perform
inspections, tests, repairs and maintenance, taking into account the mechanisms of equipment
deterioration, seeking to preserve its integrity and reliability.
2 – Application and Scope:
This procedure applies to onshore and offshore facilities connected to OGX and OGX
contractors oil and natural gas drilling and production operations.
This procedure is to be implemented based on the Risk Analysis study, Critical Systems, and on
equipment construction design standards. Good operating practices are those described in the
manufacturers' manuals and in the operational procedures issued by OGX.
3 – References:
 Risk Assessment Study Preparation Procedure – PG.OG.SMS.002
 Critical Equipment Management Procedure – PG.OG.SMS.007
4 – Definitions and Acronyms:
4.1 - ABNT: Brazilian Association of Technical Standards.
4.2 - Rated Area: Any area with a potential risk of explosion.
4.3 - Calibration: Set of operations establishing the relationship between the values indicated by
a measuring instrument and the values established by the magnitude in the standards.
4.4 - Reliability: Refers to the situation where the equipment remains operational throughout the
design service life without detectable failure, provided that submitted to compliance
maintenance following the guidelines prescribed in the operating instructions and
manufacturer's manuals and not having been overloaded beyond the design limits.
4.5 - END – Non-Destructive Testing (NDT): Tests performed with finished or semi-finished
materials in order to detect the presence or absence of discontinuities or defects by applying the
physical principles set forth in the procedures, without changing physical, chemical, mechanical
or dimensional characteristics and without interfering with subsequent use thereof.
4.6 - EPS - Welding Procedure Specification.
4.7 - Hidden Failure: A latent system failure that is manifested when the function is required. For
the sake of prevention, proactive actions should be in place (procedures).
4.8 - Frequency: Number of times an event (impact, oscillation, contact) may occur over a given
period of time.

Management Procedure PG.OG.SMS.018 Issued on: 04/May/12
Version
02
Mechanical Integrity Procedure Page 4 of 17
4.9 - HP - Hold Point: Inspection event, reported by the Contractor, which requires analysis,
verification or attestation by OGX inspection and without which the inspection process cannot
continue and be validated.
4.10 - Inspection: Set of coordinated activities designed to implement and document the status
of the equipment, piping, sensors, measuring instruments or system.
4.11 - Integrity: Property of equipment, piping, sensors, measuring instruments or system,
whether damaged or not, to remain operational offering an acceptable risk to safety and to
process reliability.
4.12 - Corrective Maintenance: Maintenance that includes all actions to return a failed system to
operational status or available.
4.13 - Predictive Maintenance: Maintenance based on the systematic application of analysis
techniques, employing centralized monitoring or sampling means in order to optimize Preventive
and Corrective Maintenance.
4.14 - Preventive Maintenance: Maintenance aimed to keep the system in operational status or
available by preventing the occurrence of failures. Maintenance intervals are to be defined in
the Maintenance Plan.
4.15 - Monitoring: Component intrinsic design function or performed by security interface which
guarantees the functionality of a security system when a component or a device has its function
reduced or limited, or when there is a hazard due to changes in process conditions.
4.16 - NBR: Brazilian Standard.
4.17 - NR: Guiding Rule (Labor and Employment Ministry).
4.18 - PDCA: Plan (prior to any process, activities must be planned and objectives and method
of execution must be set up), Develop (plan implementation by guiding/coaching people and
collecting data for control), Check (monitoring and evaluation of the process by employing
assessment tools and recording, correcting deviations) and Act (determination of a solution for
any deviations found thereby improving the process).
4.19 - PIT - Inspection and Test Plan: A document prepared by the Operator or the Contractor
clearly describing the steps to be taken for implementing the inspections and testings based on
a standard, code, requirements, specification, or procedure. The document must indicate
checks and inspections, HP or WP.
4.20 - Procedure: Written description of all essential parameters and precautions to be followed
for a given activity, according to the criteria established in a standard, code or specification.
4.21 - Skilled Professional: A skilled worker that can demonstrate their skills and abilities
through the application of written comprehensive examinations and documented results that will
allow an individual to engage in a specific activity.
4.22 - Reference Book: A set of documents systematically organized so as to provide an
updated memory (history) concerning a particular piece of equipment/facility.
4.23 - SNQC - National System of Qualification and Certification of Personnel.
4.24 - WP - Witness Point: Inspection event, reported by the Contractor, where Contractor
notifies OGX inspection aiming the analysis, verification or attestation of the events previously
assigned in the Inspection and Test Plan (PIT), without discontinuing the manufacturing
process.
4.25 - Qualified Professional: A worker holding legal authority to exercise engineering activities
in design, monitoring of operation, maintenance, inspection and supervision of boilers and
pressure vessels in accordance with professional regulations in force.

Version
02
5 – Responsibilities:
5.1 - Top Management: must ensure compliance with the conditions specified in this procedure.
5.2 - Unit Management: Ensure the implementation of this procedure in the operational areas
under their responsibility.
5.3 - SMS Management: Support the operational areas in the implementation of this procedure,
as well as conduct periodic audits to check the implementation and any deviations.
5.4 - Maintenance Management: Perform all activities in compliance with the guidelines in this
procedure.
5.5 – Contractor: Operate and carry out this management practice.
6 – Assumptions:
6.1 – Planning
6.1.1 – Procedures
Implementation, inspection and testing procedures (operating procedures) must be prepared so
as clearly to set out the actions to be performed. The system must ensure continuous control
and updating (PDCA cycle).
The requirements of any procedures issued by contractors must be perfectly aligned with OGX's
SGSO guidelines.
Check lists – to validate the evidences that actions have been performed and attested.
Procedures must communicate the minimum qualifications of the personnel involved in tests
and inspections and in the development of specific procedures. E.g.: END and Welding
Inspectors must be SNQC-certified. EPS qualification and END procedures, Inspectors at
required level.
6.1.2 – Plans
PITs (Inspection and Test Plans) and Maintenance Plans must clearly communicate which
pieces of equipment belong to the Critical Operational Safety System. The contents of the PIT
must be aligned with Annex 3.
The following must be considered in the objective of the Inspection Plans:
• Verification of operation and process compliance with project acceptable variables.
• The inspection plan must cover potential damage mechanisms.
• Provide information about safety conditions required in the activities (work permit,
interlock, radiation protection, confined space, working at height, PPE/CPE, etc.).
• Inspection methods must be reliable aiming at:
 Detection of damage mechanisms;
 Inaccessible areas must be communicated and, where possible, complementary
methods/ENDs must be employed;
 Frequency of inspections/tests;
 Definition of performance acceptability criteria;

Version
02
 Progress tracking with results attested by qualified personnel.
• Data and results obtained through inspections will be systematically recorded in order to
enable:
 Follow-up in subsequent inspections;
 Guidelines for planning new inspections;
 Orientation for any investigations designed to detect and eliminate the causes of
damage
 Curbing the progression of the damage;
 Becoming part of the record keeping system with the history of the equipment –
Reference Book.
• Results will be analyzed according to the criteria established in the procedures, allowing:
 Checking/monitoring of equipment current integrity status;
 Determining equipment remaining life (life cycle);
 Checking serviceability by comparing the results against the records made for other
similar pieces of equipment (if possible);
 Issuing reports with recommendations for better planning/implementation aiming
future inspection.
• The inspection plan must generate maintenance recommendations in order to:
 Provide feedback for future inspection plans;
 Monitor implementation thereof and the service time;
 During plan implementation activities must be inspected and approved by the person
in charge of the maintenance or his/her agent.
Note: Inspections and tests performed on pressure vessels and boilers framed in NR-13 must
meet the requirements of this standard and be approved by a qualified professional.
6.1.3 – Asset Integrity - Equipment List:
Lists must be compiled for better control:
• List of equipment and systems belonging to the inspections and tests plan;
• List of critical process equipment based on safety and manufacturers information,
updated and available to maintenance personnel. Example of critical equipment:
 pressure vessels and storage tanks;
 control and pressure relief systems;
 controls / interlocks / alarms / critical tools;
 emergency devices, including shutdown systems;
 emergency response equipment;
 ventilation systems and devices;
 piping and fittings in critical service;
 metering/monitoring devices;
 emergency communication / alarm systems;

Version
02
 key links between process and service;
 lifting equipment (slings, lugs, baskets, skids, shackles, cranes, etc.).
 grounding and electrical connections;
 process pumps/vents/exhausts;
 emergency generators;
 other specific critical drilling and vessels equipment.
Notes:
1 - Any physical identification on the equipment (plate, label, punching, etc.) must be in
compliance with the Equipment List/Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Plan) for field
verification, ensuring perfect correlation (traceability) in the system.
2 – The list of facility pieces of equipment must be aligned with the information included in the
Description of the Maritime Unit (DUM) or Description of Onshore Unit (DUT).
6.2 – SGSO Quality Assurance Requirements:
SGSO requirements must be aligned with OGX SMS Management Manual such as:
• Management Commitment;
• Policies and Objectives;
• SMS Planning;
• Review;
• Internal Communication;
• Audits;
• Provision of Resources;
• Relations with Suppliers and Contractors;
• Metering and Monitoring;
• Continuous Improvement.
6.3 – Rated Areas:
Any equipment belonging to rated areas must be clearly identified in the Equipment List.
Consider the highest risk level (zone) according to the restrictions adopted in the standard.
Operation (construction and installation) thereof must be made in such a way as to prevent the
risk of ignition from sparks (static electricity or friction between moving or hot parts and other
spark sources).
It is valuable to have a specific training program in place for electrical equipment in potentially
explosive atmospheres to inform the personnel about the risks and the basic security concepts.
6.4 – Critical Systems:
Critical systems such as controllers, SDCD’s, emergency lighting, protections and
instrumentation, must operate properly even if a failure in normal power feeding system occurs,
in order to avoid situations that will worsen facility emergency shutdowns. Contingency actions,

Version
02
where possible, must be implemented and described in the operational documents to guarantee
the required reliability.
It is relevant to consider such data as: manufacturers’ recommendations, good engineering
practices, risk analysis study, previous operation experiences and similarity of
equipment/systems.
Any critical equipment must have a reference book clearly demonstrating the history of
interventions. Such book must include, at least, the following information:
• A copy of the operating manual supplied by the manufacturer, in Portuguese;
• Technical specifications;
• Inspection, maintenance and certification program;
• Record of inspections, maintenance and certification;
• Action plan for correction of non-conformities detected during inspections, maintenance
and certification;
• Identification and signature of the technician appointed by the company.
Inspection Reports must provide at least the following information:
• Items inspected and non-conformities detected, describing those preventing the
equipment from being operated and those not interfering with operation;
• Corrective action taken for deterrent non-conformities;
• Identification of Procedure and reference standard;
• Metering devices employed;
• Identification of the Unit, equipment and system;
• Identification of inspector and inspection report;
• Review and approval by SGSO's person responsible;
• Numerical identification.
A correction schedule must be set up to address those non-conformities not preventing the
operation of the equipment and not posing any danger to health and safety, either alone or in
combination.
6.5 – Mechanical integrity review meetings:
The department is expected to convene periodic meetings to review SGSO mechanical integrity
with management, aiming to assess:
• Action Plan;
• Internal and external audits;
• Indicators employed and overall performance;
• Effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions;
• Assessment/reassessment of risk identification;
• Documents review (Procedure and records);
• SSO objectives applicable to mechanical integrity;

Version
02
• Effectiveness of inspection, testing and maintenance processes;
• Appraisal of resources applicable to mechanical integrity (material and personnel);
• Analysis of requirements and other requirements applicable to mechanical integrity.
6.6 – Bibliographical References
 ABNT NBR 14725:2009 – Chemicals;
 ABNT NBR ISO 10004:2004 – Solid Wastes;
 NR 10 –Electricity Installations and Services;
 NR 13 – Boilers and Pressure Vessels;
 ABNT NBR 14842:2003 – Criteria for Welding Inspectors;
 ABNT NBR ISO 9712:2004 – END, Personnel Qualification;
6.7 – Records:
See Check lists in Annex 1.
7 – Adequacy for the Business
Not applicable.
8 – Annexes:
Annex 1 – Check List.
Annex 2 - Equipment Integrity Flowchart.
Annex 3 - Structure for an Inspection and Testing Plan.
Annex 4 - SGSO Document Structure Model.
Annex 5 - Diagram proposed for the cause and effect analysis of failures in operating system
critical equipment.
Annex 6 - Functional diagram for analyzing system breakdown.

Version
02
Annex 1 – Check List
SGSO – Check List (LV)
Nº:
REV:
MECHANICAL INTEGRITY Page 1/2
REFERENCE DOCUMENT
ANP, SGSO-MN-02-REV.1 - MANUAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE
AUDITORIAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO DA CONFORMIDADE DE SGSO
(SGSO CONFORMITY CHECKING AUDIT MANUAL.
FACILITY/LOCATION/DATE
SUPPLIER/PERSON IN CHARGE:
INSPECTION/PERSON IN
CHARGE:
CHECKING ITEMS REPORT
1 IS THERE ANY EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IN PLACE?
2 EMPLOYEE AND CONTRACTORS ACCESS TO RISK AREAS IS CONTROLLED AND FLAGGED?
3 IS THERE ANY BOILERS AND VESSEL INSPECTION PROGRAM AS PER NR-13?
4
IS THE NR-13 PROGRAM CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLEXITY OF THE RISK OF EQUIPMENT
AND FACILITIES?
5
HAVE BOILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS OPERATORS BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE TRAINING
AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER NR-13.
6
IS THERE ANY INSPECTION AND LOAD TESTING PROGRAM IN PLACE FOR LIFTING
EQUIPMENT? IS THERE ANY VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION PLATE (LABEL) COMMUNICATING THE
STATUS OF LOAD TESTS?
7
LIFTING EQUIPMENT OPERATORS AND CARRIERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN APPROPRIATE
TRAINING?
8
HAVE THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN RATED AREAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE INSPECTION
PROGRAM?
9
IS THERE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT ROUTINE IN PLACE DURING
MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION SHUTDOWNS?
10 IS THERE A ROUTINE FOR EQUIPMENT SAFE OPERATION IN PLACE?
11
DOES CRITICAL EQUIPMENT HAVE A HISTORY OF MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION AND
TESTING (REFERENCE BOOK) AVAILABLE?
12
DOES THE ORGANIZATION SET UP AND KEEP PROCEDURES FOR WORKPLACE DESIGN,
PROCESSES, MACHINES OPERATING PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS, IN ORDER TO
ELIMINATE OR REDUCE HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK AT THE SOURCE?
13 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR WORK IN PRESSURIZED PIPELINES IN PLACE?
14
IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR APR/PT PREPARATION/ISSUANCE IN PLACE? HAVE
APR/PT BEEN APPROPRIATELY ARCHIVED?
15
ARE SGSO RELATED RECORDS (REPORTS, CHECK LISTS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.) LEGIBLE,
IDENTIFIABLE, TRACEABLE AND WERE PROPERLY STORED?
16 IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE IN LACE TO DETECT NEEDED TRAINING?
Nº:
REV:

Version
02
REFERENCE DOCUMENT
ANP, SGSO-MN-02-REV.1 - MANUAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE
AUDITORIAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO DA CONFORMIDADE DE SGSO
(SGSO CONFORMITY CHECKING AUDIT MANUAL.
FACILITY/LOCATION/DATE
SUPPLIER/PERSON IN CHARGE:
INSPECTION/PERSON IN
CHARGE:
1 IS THERE ANY EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IN PLACE?
2 EMPLOYEE AND CONTRACTORS ACCESS TO RISK AREAS IS CONTROLLED AND FLAGGED?
3 IS THERE ANY BOILERS AND VESSEL INSPECTION PROGRAM AS PER NR-13?
4
IS THE NR-13 PROGRAM CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLEXITY OF THE RISK OF EQUIPMENT
AND FACILITIES?
5
HAVE BOILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS OPERATORS BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE TRAINING
AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER NR-13.
6
IS THERE ANY INSPECTION AND LOAD TESTING PROGRAM IN PLACE FOR LIFTING
EQUIPMENT? IS THERE ANY VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION PLATE (LABEL) COMMUNICATING THE
STATUS OF LOAD TESTS?
7
LIFTING EQUIPMENT OPERATORS AND CARRIERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN APPROPRIATE
TRAINING?
8
HAVE THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN RATED AREAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE INSPECTION
PROGRAM?
9
IS THERE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT ROUTINE IN PLACE DURING
MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION SHUTDOWNS?
10 IS THERE A ROUTINE FOR EQUIPMENT SAFE OPERATION IN PLACE?
11
DOES CRITICAL EQUIPMENT HAVE A HISTORY OF MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION AND
TESTING (REFERENCE BOOK) AVAILABLE?
12
DOES THE ORGANIZATION SET UP AND KEEP PROCEDURES FOR WORKPLACE DESIGN,
PROCESSES, MACHINES OPERATING PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS, IN ORDER TO
ELIMINATE OR REDUCE HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK AT THE SOURCE?
13 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR WORK IN PRESSURIZED PIPELINES IN PLACE?
14
IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR APR/PT PREPARATION/ISSUANCE IN PLACE? HAVE
APR/PT BEEN APPROPRIATELY ARCHIVED?
15
ARE SGSO RELATED RECORDS (REPORTS, CHECK LISTS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.) LEGIBLE,
IDENTIFIABLE, TRACEABLE AND WERE PROPERLY STORED?
16 IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE IN LACE TO DETECT NEEDED TRAINING?

Version
02
NOTE: REFER TO ANP MANUAL CHECKLIST (REFERENCE DOCUMENT), MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
No. 1, FOR THE INCLUSION OF OTHER VERIFICATION ITEMS.
APPRAISAL REPORT/CAPTION: S - SATISFACTORY N - NOT SATISFACTORY NA - NOT
APPLICABLE
NOTES:
17
IS THE NEED AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING PROVIDED ASSESSED? IS THERE ANY
EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AVAILABLE? IS THERE A PROCEDURE FOR THIS
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT?
18
DO CONTRACTORS HAVE RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES IN PLACE FOR CRITICAL
PROCESSES (HAZOP, FMEA, ETC.)? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH STUDIES
AVAILABLE? HAS THIS STUDY BEEN DONE BY QUALIFIED PERSON?
19
IS THE DEFINITION OF THE ASPECTS AND IMPACTS APPLICABLE TO CRITICAL SYSTEMS
ALIGNED WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS? IS THERE ANY
EVIDENCE OF PERIODIC REVIEW OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE?
20
HAVE THE FUNCTIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES RELATED TO MECHANICAL
INTEGRITY BEEN SET UP AND FORMALIZED IN A DOCUMENT?
21
HAS CONTRACTOR APPOINTED A MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE SGSO? WAS
THERE FORMAL COMMUNICATION?
22
DOES CONTRACTOR SET UP AND KEEP A PROCEDURE TO ENSURE THAT ALL SGSO
RELATED INFORMATION WILL BE DISCLOSED TO EMPLOYEES AND STAKEHOLDERS?
23 IS THERE ANY SGSO RELATED PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AVAILABLE?
24
IS THERE A PROCEDURE FOR PURCHASE, INSPECTION, HANDLING, AND PRESERVATION
OF CRITICAL EQUIPMENT IN PLACE? ARE INSPECTIONS RECORDED?
25
ARE CONTRACTORS PERIODICALLY ASSESSED/REASSESSED AS TO SGSO? IS THERE ANY
EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS/AUDITS AVAILABLE?
26
HAVE TESTING AND METERING INSTRUMENTS BEEN CALIBRATED? HAS THE INSTRUMENT
CALIBRATION PLAN BEEN APPROVED BY THE QC?
27
IS THERE ANY SYSTEMATIC STATISTICAL EVALUATION FOR EQUIPMENT
AVAILABILITY/FITNESS RATE IN PLACE TARGETING MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? IS THERE
ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH SYSTEMATIC APPROACHE AVAILABLE?
28
ARE DETECTED NON-CONFORMITIES GENERATING ACTION PLANS (WHAT? WHO?
WHERE? WHEN? WHY? HOW? HOW MUCH?) TO ENABLE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
MITIGATING MEASURES RESULTING FROM THE INVESTIGATION/ANALYSIS PROCESS?
29
IS ANY ANALYSIS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PREVENTIVE
ACTIONS TAKEN?
30
ARE REVIEW MEETINGS CONVENED TO DISCUSS MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? ARE THE
MINUTES OF SUCH MEETINGS AVAILABLE FOR QUERY?
30
ARE REVIEW MEETINGS CONVENED TO DISCUSS MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? ARE THE
MINUTES OF SUCH MEETINGS AVAILABLE FOR QUERY?

Version
02
Annex 2 - Equipment Integrity Flowchart.
EQUIPMENT INTEGRITY FLOWCHART
1
• DEFINITION OF INTERNAL AND ESTERNAL DAMAGE MECHANISMS AND
EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
2
• SGSO PROCEDURE AND INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN (PIT).
3
• OPERATING CONDITIONS MONITORING AND CONTROL
4
• INSPECTION PROCEDURE
5
• MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROCEDURE
6
• APPLICABLE REGISTRATIONS

Version
02
Annex 3 - Structure for an Inspection and Testing Plan
STRUCTURE FOR AN INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN
PIT
GARANTIA DA
COMPATIBILID
ADE COM A
DOCUMENTAÇ
ÃO APLICÁVEL
INFORMAÇÕES
SOBRE OS
DISPOSITIVOS
E
EQUIPAMENTO
S APLICÁVEIS
ESPECIFICAR
OS CRITÉRIOS
DE
ACEITAÇÃO
DESCRIÇÃO
SUMÁRIA DAS
ETAPAS DO TESTE
E/OU INSPEÇÃO
COM POSSÍVEIS
INTERVENÇÕES
INDICAÇÃO DA
QUALIFICAÇÃO
DO PESSOAL
REQUERIDO
INFORMAR O
TIPO DE
DOCUMENTO
DE REGISTRO

Version
02
Annex 4 - SGSO Document Structure Model
SGSO DOCUMENT STRUCTURE MODEL
POLÍTICA
DO SGSO
PROCEDIMENTOS DO
SISTEMA.
PROCEDIMENTOS/INSTRUÇÕES
OPERACIONAIS E PLANOS DE INSPEÇÃO,
TESTES E MANUTENÇÃO.
REGISTROS/EVIDÊNCIAS COMPROBATÓRIAS (RELATÓRIOS,
LISTAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO, CERTIFICADOS ETC)

Version
02
Annex 5 - Diagram proposed for the cause and effect analysis of failures in operating
system critical equipment.
DIAGRAM PROPOSED FOR THE CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS OF FAILURES IN
OPERATING SYSTEM CRITICAL EQUIPMENT.
FALHA
TESTE/INSPEÇÃOMANUTENÇÃOOPERAÇÃO
PESSOALMATERIAL
CAUSA
CAUSA CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA
CAUSA

Version
02
Annex 6 - Functional diagram for analyzing system breakdown
FUNCTIONAL DIAGRAM FOR ANALYZING SYSTEM BREAKDOWN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Example of failure/effects mode analysis in systems/equipment in items/components by
employing splitting levels (review). The purpose is to communicate the operating conditions
required for the system.
COMPRESSOR
MOTOR
INSTRUMENTAÇÃO
E
MONITORAMENTO
RESERVATÓRIO
DE AR E
CONEXÕES
LUBRIFICAÇÃOREFRIGERAÇÃO
VÁLVULAS DE
ALÍVIO E LEITURA
DE PRESSÃO E
SOBRECARGA
VÁLVULA DE ALÍVIO
E LEITURA DE
PRESSÃO DA ÁGUA
DE REFRIGERAÇÃO
1º NÍVEL DE ANÁLISE
2º NÍVEL DE ANÁLISE
3rd LEVEL ANALYSIS

Pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng

Similar to Pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng