Track 12. Educational innovation Authors: Jorge Joo, Fernando Martínez-Abad and José Rafael García-Bermejo

1. Perception about Augmented Reality
and Mobile Pedestrian Navigation
tools with heritage contents in the
field of Education
Jorge Joo Nagata - José Rafael García-Bermejo Giner – Fernando
Martinez Abad
jorge.joo@umce.cl - coti@usal.es - fma@usal.es
Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación (UMCE), José Pedro Alessandri Street 774
Santiago de Chile
(56)-224122469
Grial Group – IUCE Group. University of Salamanca
Plaza de los Caídos, S/N CP 37008. Despacho 3017
Salamanca. Spain.
(34)- 923294400-1303
Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16

2. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Introduction
The context of mobility and portability in education has produced a
significant increase in recent times, both formal and informal settings.
In parallel, complementary tools such as Augmented Reality (AR) and
Mobile Pedestrian Navigation (MPN) have been favoured with
increasing the potential of mobile devices, with clear consequences,
from the general area, for social processes and, in particular, to
educational processes.
The use of these technologies are framed within larger dimensions as
are the Electronic Learning (e-learning) y el Mobile Learning (m-
learning).
This study aims to determine the perception of students about
educational processes related to the MPN and AR, framed within the
territorial presentation of information about the historical and cultural
heritage.

3. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Objectives and Hypothesis
• The objectives arising from the area of technology and
educational implementation, evaluating the process of
perception learning tools used in contexts m-learning and e-
learning.
• The attitudes that students have the AR-MPN application in the
context of m-learning /e-learning is studied, through a concrete
example of the territory and heritage.
• The absence of significant differences between the type of
resource used, and results in the assessment of the activities
worked.

4. Theoretical context
Learning with Augmented Reality (AR)
Mobile Pedestrian Navigation System
(MPN)
Methodologies in Mobile Learning (m-
learning) vs Electronic Learning (e-learning)
Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16

5. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Methodology and Research Development
Delimitation of territorial contexts by Heritage.
Computer implementation of educational activities.
Population and sample.
Assessment tool.
Data analysis.

6. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Methodology and Research Development
Delimitation of territorial contexts by Heritage.
Computer implementation of educational activities.
Population and sample.
Assessment tool.
Data analysis.

7. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Methodology and Research Development
Delimitation of territorial contexts by Heritage.
Computer implementation of educational activities.
Population and sample.
Assessment tool.
Data analysis.

8. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Methodology and Research Development
Delimitation of territorial contexts by Heritage.
Computer implementation of educational activities.
Population and sample.
Assessment tool.
Data analysis.
QUESTION/ AFFIRMATION CODIFICATION DIMENSION
1. I'm not comfortable using the
application
[ITEM_1]
Application -
Implementation
2. The application gives me
confidence in the use of tablets
(or PC Desktops)
[ITEM_2] Hardware
3. It is easy to navigate within the
application used
[ITEM_3]
Application -
Implementation
4. The information displayed in
the application is not always
accurate
[ITEM_4]
Application -
Contents
5. The application has been given
a positive impression of the
contents about heritage
[ITEM_5]
Application -
Contents
6. The application has given me
important information for my
learning
[ITEM_6]
Application -
Contents –
Implementation
7. The graphic design of the
application is not visually
appealing
[ITEM_7]
Application -
Implementation
8. It is difficult to use the
application
[ITEM_8]
Application -
Implementation
9. I was given enough
information for the use of the
application
[ITEM_9]
Application -
Implementation
10. I like the information that
shows the application
[ITEM_10]
Application -
Contents

9. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Methodology and Research Development
Delimitation of territorial contexts by Heritage.
Computer implementation of educational activities.
Population and sample.
Assessment tool.
Data analysis.

10. Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Discussion of data
3,72
3,95
4,18
3,32
3,95
3,93
3,55
4,15
3,95
4,1
3,61
3,9
4,11
3,31
4,03
3,77
3,43
4,08
4,05
4,07
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
[ITEM_1] I am
comfortable
using the
app/software
[ITEM_2] The
app has given
me confidence
in using
technology
(tablet/PC-
Desktop)
[ITEM_3] The
app/software is
easy to
navigate
[ITEM_4] The
information
displayed in
the app is not
always
accurate
[ITEM_5] The
app/software
gives me a
positive
impression
about contents
of heritage
[ITEM_6] The
app/software
gives me
important
information for
my learning
[ITEM_7] The
graphic desing
of the
app/software
are visually
appealing
[ITEM_8] The
app/software is
easy to use
[ITEM_9] I
was given
enough
information for
the use of the
app/software
[ITEM_10] I
like
information
about the
contents being
available by
app/software
m-learning e-learning
Strongly
agree

11. Conclusions
In summary, the general perception of students is around a nominal value
“agree” all assertions arising from the instrument, resulting in a positive
outcome from the field of satisfaction with the activity
Digital resources such as AR, pedestrian navigation and digital maps on
devices like tablets and computers, have demonstrated good acceptance by
students in the learning processes of local content and assets.
In this research, the m-learning processes such as e-learning, achieve positive
perceptions, there were no statistically significant differences in contrast
groups.
Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16
Future lines of work arising from the reproducibility of this research, with the
use of the AR, the digital mapping and MPN in other thematic contexts, and
different student grades

12. Thank you very much for your attention
Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’16