The document discusses pedagogical design applications in eLearning environments. It summarizes the 10th Annual Iranian conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICELET2016), which addressed topics like the growth of eLearning markets in regions worldwide from 2014-2016. The document also discusses the dynamic drivers of technology, pedagogy, and content in eLearning; outlines frameworks and models for effective eLearning design; and examines considerations and key dimensions for ensuring engaging and worthwhile eLearning.
16. Technology …
1980s – Web 1.0
/ Computer
Based Training
1990s –
Multimedia
PC with CD
ROM / LMS
Early 2000s –
Rise of
Internet /
web based
Training
2006 – 2010 –
MOOCs
HTML5
Smartphones
2011-
present
Big Data
Learning
Analytics
BYOD
MOOC
Boom
Gamification
Augmented
Reality
ICELET201
6
17. Multiple Pedagogies …
Lectures Reading
Audio / Visual
/
Demonstration
Discussion Practice by
Doing
Learning
Through
Teaching
ICELET201
6
LOW
HIGH
21. Pedagogy of eLearning
Characteristics of Web:
Physicality of media
Social Interactions
Conversational Pragmatics
Hypermedia based
Diversity of Resources
Multimodality
ICELET201
6
23. Lack of Pedagogical
Considerations
Weigel (2000): Online courses lacked any
pedagogical considerations, rather being “little
more than an exercise of posting on the Internet
an enhances syllabus that includes lecture
content, reading assignments and practice tests
along with using discussion groups and e-mails
to respond to students questions”
Weigel, V. (2000). E-learning and the tradeoff between richness and the reach
in higher education. Change, 33(5), 10-15.
ICELET201
6
24. Effectiveness of web: a
disappointment
Carr-Chellman and Duchastel (2000)
It is also evident that many online courses lack
basic design consideration and that the web is
simply being used as a medium for delivery of
instructions created within another framework.
Such transposition from one medium to another
may have some value in reaching certain
outreach goals, but it also run serious risks of
diluting the original instruction and possibly
rendering it ineffective (p.229).
ICELET201
6
Carr-Chellman, A., & Duchastel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 31(3), 229-241.
26. Engaging for worthwhile
learning
In whatever way the online education
practices are used, trends showed a need for
a paradigm shift from teacher to student
centered learning; from simply passing on
knowledge to constructions of knowledge and
collaboration (Salmon, 2000; Bates, 2001; Laurillard,
2002).
ICELET201
6
Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post-secondary education and training. Paris,
France: UNESCO, IIEP
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use
of learning technologies. London, UK: Routledge
Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page.
27. ERIC Model
Sharma and Mishra (2007) suggested
Experience-Reflect-Interact-Construct (ERIC)
model for learner engagement in digital
environments.
ICELET201
6
Sharma, R. C. & Mishra, S. (2007). Cases on global e-learning practices: Successes and pitfalls. Hershey, PA: Idea
Group Publishing.
28. Shift from Instructor based to
Hybridisation
ICELET201
6
http://ayracapital.com/global-trends-in-elearning-2/
29. Considerations …
Not all are online, yet use some form or other
of electronic technology
Personalisation of Learning
Efficient employment of eLearning by
teachers
reduce the psychological transactional
distance between the individual student and
the content to be learnt
ICELET201
6