Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Declaration in between


Published on

A moment of reflection after more then ten years of struggle for justice in the Netherlands after being vicitim of blameable medical activities.

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Declaration in between

  1. 1. Declaration in between After ten years of research and activities I came to certain conclusions. - In my case -although through a process of err (mistaking the left side-chamber for the Cisterna Magna for instance)- certain conclusions are about to rise also in subsidiary blame. - And I have found with research on expert-writings about the setting by which medical violation on patients in the western world is a respected and protected value. To be ill is big business over the back of patients. In conclusion in my case we might say that quiet more things did happen then just making a window opening between the sub-arachnoid cyst and the Cisterna Magna; but the patient is completely unprotected before and after. We can speak about a mechanical removal of the left Vene Transversus, not caused by a natural thrombosis, neither by one caused by hitting the vena occipitals (because that one is anatomically even missing before) etc. And there are more findings as partly already exposed. But as a layman it is very hard to go against the stream of abuse of knowledge and profession when being right on certain facts kept hidden and also when being wrong on certain facts (not to be corrected) because ALL IS as much as possible to be kept in the dark. There has been operated in the neck, as blood traces show out, but officially all doctors deny. But surgery was only on the backside of the head, so no need for such a large scar. If a Michel-clip 14 x 3 mm 2 did sank down from inside the head into the Leptomeningen being 1 mm thick only, and I did not get lethargic of, then why there was a need to destroy the integrity of scan material with signs of manipulation of the material, if there is nothing (else) to hide? Unofficially some doctors mentioned the situation of covering up. But those that are in position to speak do not question the situation. Also for the foreign material in the head, certain quotes were made in my network, but not officially. In conclusion of the setting around abuse of medical legislation and patients: everything is set to protect the image of profession in the first place: therefore also in evil matters. That is why we had in the Netherlands 25 years long a Dr. Jansen Steur badly active, etc. The awareness of the over- protectoral cult also gives the practitioners the encouragement to career-adventurism. I have pointed out with Lacuna of Medical Justice in the Netherlands how come this can all happen and in conclusion we might say in: If one goes to a doctor one is not all certain of the quality and integrity of that person. Will it be a real doctor to help you, a career adventurer to abuse you or even a real quack? Because of the code of silence is meant to protect the image of profession at the first place, and the group of profession has to judge on issues in the first place, the entanglement of interest is easily realized. That situation is also deliberately kept by (Dutch) politicians. Trias Politica is a joke as democracy is with. People are only allowed to choose heads in elections. Real issues as this one do not fit in a society mainly interested in producing industry. But this here is a mere example of wrong. Maurice Jolie in ‘Discussion in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu’: Industry needs relative peace and within (ruling) one can be corrupt and destroy people but within a certain limit. Make sure that your victims also encounter very extreme things so also nobody will believe what happened. I think the warnings from Maurice Jolie his book have been multiple taken for abuse with. I see in the setting about medical legislation that Kafka-minded thinking nicely hidden as Jolie warned for before.