SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
ISSN 2094 - 4454
Vol. 7, No. 1,
2015
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Andrew D. Ordonio1, Vernard M. Martinez2, Rodrigo G. Paglomutan, Jr3. and Mac
Edmund G. Gimotea4
1Facultyof Fisheries, 2Student of Fisheries, 3RDU Data Analyst, 4RDU Research Assistant
Abstract. The mangrove of Pasil was surveyed to document the community-
academe partnership on mangrove assessment and conservation. The baseline
data will serve any future species and diversity monitoring and for future
development proposals appropriate for community-based species-based
mangrove conservation in Pasil. The “true mangroves” of Pasil is composed of 19
species belonging to 9 families. The 8 species representing 44% of the total
mangrove species in Pasil belong to Family Rhizophoraceae. The plants classified
as“semi-mangrove” is composed of 26 species belonging to 8 families. The
“mangrove associated species” is composed of 36 species belonging to 22 families.
On floral diversity, a total of nine (9) “true mangrove” species were found in the
three sampling sites. A. marina is a common species in the three streams while
C. decandra, S. alba, and L. racemosa are unique species of the lower stream. The
lower stream that serves both the inlet and the outlet of the estuarine water is
74.65% species diverse compared with the diversity of mangrove floral species in
the mid (65.83%) and in the upper (57.05%) streams. A. marina is the most
dominant species in all sites. The Community-based Species-based Approach to
Conservation largely focused on the Near Threatened mangrove, C. decandra. In
“community-based species-based conservation”, the community involvement
potentially lead to more informed decision-making and it help reduce costly
project designs. This report convinced the implementers and the PO partner that
species conservation and community involvement works. The continued floral
and faunal and ecological assessment of Pasil mangrove is recommended.
Keywords: mangrove assessment, species conservation, foral composition,
diversity, community action
CHMSCCOFRDU
Received final
draft:
February 20,
2015
Peer reviewed:
January 10, 2015
Received
manuscript:
October 20,2014
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
INTRODUCTION
One of the features of the coastal village
Pasil in Enclaro, Binalbagan, Negros Occidental,
Philippines is the presence of an estuary, mudflats
and abandoned fishponds that supports some
species and some communities of mangrove. The
important characteristics of the halophytic
mangrove is the enormous biological diversity
which refers to the diversity of various species of
living organisms, plants and animals, the
presence of various ecosystem services, and
diversity valued by humans (Brown, 1998; Field,
Osborn, Hoffman, Polsemberg, Ackerly, Berry,
Bjorkman, Held, Matson, Monney, 1998; Turner,
Jeroem, van der Bergh, Soderques, Barendregt,
van der Straaten, Malthy, van der Lerland, 2000;
Shanker, Hiremath and Bawa, 2005; Diaz,
Fargione, Chapin and Tilman, 2006).
Value of Species to conservation.
Considered “currency or indicators of biology”
(Soltis and Gitzendanner, 1999; Gotelli and
Colwell, 2001), species are the basic units of
analysis in conservation biology (Joshi, 2007;
Padial, Castroviejo-Fisher, Kohler, Vila, Chaparro
and De la Riva, 2009; Ramesh, Hussain, Satpathy
and Selvanayagam, 2013). Such species diversity
and ecological services of mangrove constitute
the natural resource entitlements of the coastal
villagers (Hernández-Cornejo, Koedam, Ruiz
Luna, Troell, and Dahdouh-Guebas, 2005).
Mangrove fulfills many necessary
functions in the field of production, environment
protection and social values (Cunha-Lignon,
Kampel, Flandroy, Menghini, and Dahdouh-
Guebas, 2012). However, mangroves are
increasingly threatened and their survival is at
great risk (Primavera, Sadaba, Lebata, Altamirano,
2004; FAO, 2007; Chen, Wang, and Lin, 2009).
Indeed, this would lead to the rapid increase in
the number of Threatened mangrove species
resulting to the local extinction of some rare
species (Cunha-Lignon, et al., 2012). Knowledge
on the role of mangrove species provides
guidance on how best the species could be
conserved. First, mangrove floral species are the
foundation of the mangrove and it provides
various habitats for the flora and fauna that
together shape a unique ecosystem and form the
basis of all other mangrove returns (Ellison,
Farnsworth, and Merkt. 1999; Offenberg 2008).
Second, a species diverse mangrove area is acting
as corridor for immigrants from outside
mangrove areas having lower number of species
(Nagelkerkena, Blaberb, Bouillonc, Greene,
Haywoodf, Kirtong, Meyneckeh, Pawliki, Penrosej,
Sasekumark, Somerfieldl, 2008; Polidoro,
Carpenter , Collins, Duke, Ellison et al., 2010)).
And third, the presence of species in an
ecosystem indicates the presence of a set of other
species and whose absence indicates the lack of
that entire set of species (Lindenmayer, Margules,
and Botkin 2000).
Single-species Approach to conservation.
Knowledge of the exact floral species
composition and diversity is an important
prerequisite to understand conservation
(Jayatissa, Dahdouh-Guebas, and Koedam, 2002).
The goal of conservation is to maintain biological
diversity and the ecosystem services to humans.
Though buzzword in mangrove conservation,
conservation managers are faced with
complexities such as limited resources to
conserve species and the inability to manage all
aspects of biodiversity. The question on how best
the species could be conserved has led to a
paradigm that focused on single-species in
setting actions (Simberloff, 1998; Zachariasa and
Roff, 2001; George and Mayden, 2005; Payton,
Fenner, and Lee, 2002).
The single-species approach would seem
a perfect context for mangrove conservation in
Pasil. In terms of utility of the approach in
conservation, knowledge on species composition
and species diversity will help analyze what
species can be related to habitat types, which can,
in turn, be spatially mapped. This fundamental
prerequisite for species-based conservation
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
approach (Zachariasa, and Roff, 2001) would
succeed if scientifically based protocols will be
examined and adapted. Acceptable assessment
results could thus be used to link species and
conservation. (Dahdouh-Guebas, Verheyden, De
Genst, Hettiarachchi and Koedam, 2000).
Objectives of the Study. The mangrove of
Pasil was surveyed to document the community-
academe partnership (primarily lead by the
students) on mangrove assessment and
conservation. With this action-oriented objective,
describing Pasil mangrove in Binalbagan, Negros
Occidental Philippines was done focusing on two
major axes: 1) mangrove structural assessment;
and 2) conservation initiatives done for Pasil
mangrove.
The first specific objective was to assess
the mangrove of Pasil in terms of 1) floral species
composition within the study area and 2) species
diversity (D) and importance value (IV) within
each quadrat. The baseline data will serve any
future species and diversity monitoring and
ecological landscape management for Pasil
mangrove. The second specific objective is to
describe the community-based species-based
conservation action implemented by the CHMSC-
COF RDU and by the PO conservation partner, the
PEARL. This information will be used for future
development proposals appropriate for
Community-based Species-based mangrove
conservation in Pasil.
METHODOLOGY
Study Site. The Pasil mangrove lies within
the coastal Enclaro, Binalbagan in the 5th
Congressional District of Negros Occidental,
Philippines. The mangrove community is backed
by estuaries and intertidal mudflats frequented by
tides that empties at the southern section of
Enclaro Creek. The soil substrate within the
mangrove area is generally muddy from the mid
to upper section and generally sandy at the lower
section.
Floristic Data Collection. The mangrove
assessment was carried out over a 10-day period,
which included group discussion on the survey
methodology and was accomplished by a 10-
member team which included 5 peoples’
organization (PO) members and 5 CHMSC-COF
RDU team of researchers. All members have
participated in several mangrove assessment
projects.
Floral Species Assessment. Specimen
collections were made at the natural habitat of
the study are. Small branches of the plants with
leaves and some flowers and fruits were collected
and packed separately in polyethylene bags and
in large containers and were brought to the RDU
laboratory. The morphologic diagnosis, species
identification, and conservation status followed
several reports and field guides example
Primavera, Sadaba, Lebata, Altamirano (2004),
Calumpong and Menez (1996). Aside specimen
collection within each quadrat, (i) village walk; (ii)
transect walk; (iii) and key informant (KI) help
were done. In this study, the KI is a person who
had a great deal with the Pasil mangrove
resource.
Categorization of Mangrove Species.
Following Basha (1992) and Ram and Shaji (2013),
the mangrove with strongly marked
characteristics is grouped under “true
mangroves”. There are also plants with less
strongly marked characteristics, which are known
as “semi-mangrove”. There is yet another group
of plants, which grow adjoining the mangrove
areas but thrive on the land which does not
submerge by brackish water even during the high
tides but can withstand some amount of brackish
water stagnation for a short period. These can be
grouped as “mangrove associated species”.
Species Diversity and Importance Value.
The three sampling stations were identified by the
team as upper, mid, and lower streams. The
location of the center of each sampling plot was
randomly determined through random point
generator using the crude map and the Google
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
Earth map. Each site was further sub-divided into
3 randomly selected 10m x 10m sizes quadrats.
The species present in the quadrats were
identified and their numbers were recorded in a
tabular column. The quantitative measures
describing the analytical characteristics of the
Pasil mangrove floral community includes
diversity (D) and importance value (IV) of the
species.
Treatment of the Data. The widely used
Simpson Diversity Index for comparing diversity
between various sampling sites was used to
measure diversity of true mangroves of Pasil. This
index assumes that individuals are randomly
sampled from an independently large population
(Clarke and Warwick, 2001). Following Snedakar
and Snedarker (1984) and Vyas and Joshi (2013),
the density, relative density, basal area,
dominance, and relative dominance of each
species in every plot and the relative frequency of
each species within the forest were calculated to
determine the Importance Value (IV) of each
species. The IV indicates the structural
importance of a species within a stand of mixed
species.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Floral Composition. The “true mangroves”
of Pasil is composed of 19 species belonging to 9
families. The 8 species representing 44% of the
total mangrove species in Pasil belong to Family
Rhizophoraceae. The shrubby Acanthaceae,
Acanthus volubilis although very few in number
could still be found in the upper section growing
in the fishpond dikes. The shrub Aegiceras
corniculatum belonging to Family Myrsinaceae,
usually thriving in the front zones was found
growing in the lower section.
The plants classified as“semi-mangrove”
was composed of 26 species belonging to 8
families. The six species were described as trees.
None of the semi-mangrove species was included
in the IUCN Red List for Threatened species. The
“mangrove associated species” was composed of
36 species belonging to 22 families. This group
of plants is mostly trees and mostly introduced
into the backyards of the villagers for food
example the Family Anacardiaceae and for
traditional medicine example, the plants
belonging to Family Annonaceae.
Floral Diversity. A total of nine (9) “true
mangrove” species were found in the three
sampling sites in Pasil. Nine of these species were
observed at the lower stream, whereas only 6 and
5 species were observed at the midstream and at
the upper stream, respectively. A. marina is a
common species in the three streams while C.
decandra, S. alba, and L. racemosa are unique
species of the lower stream. The probability of
the variation or diversity of species increases in
the sampled quadrat from the lower to the upper
stream. The species in the lower stream is 74.65%
species diverse compared with the mid (65.83%)
and in the upper (57.05%) streams. The A. marina
was the most observed species in all sites. In the
lower stream, the two other species mostly
observed were A. corniculatum, C. decandra, and
S. alba. In the midstream, the A.marina. R.
mucronata and B. cylindrica were the mostly
observed species. In the upper stream B.
cylindrica population established along with A.
marina and R. mucronata.
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
Table 1. Species composition and phylogeneticaggregates of “true mangrove” speciesin Pasil
Species Families
Local Name,
Life Forms, Trees
ConservationStatus, IUCN
Red List, NT
Conservation
Actions
Acanthus volubilis Acanthaceae Ragoyroy Shrub LeastConcern (LC)
Avicennia marina Avicenniaceae Bungalon Tree LeastConcern (LC)
Avicennia rhumpiana Bungalon Tree Vulnerable (V)
Lumnitzera racemosa Combretacea Tabao/culasi Shrub LeastConcern (LC)
Excoecaria agallocha Euphorbiaceae Lipata/Alipata Tree LeastConcern (LC)
Xylocarpus mollucensis Meliaceae Tabigi, Piagao Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Aegiceras corniculatum Myrsinaceae Saging-saging Shrub LeastConcern (LC) /
Nypha fruticans Palmae Nipa Palm NotEvaluated (NE)
Bruguiera cylindrical Rhizophoraceae Lapis-lapis Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Bruguiera gymneroza Pototan Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Bruguera sexangula Pototan Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Ceriops decandra Baras-baras Shrub Near Threatened (NT) /
Ceriops tagal Tanggal Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Rhizophora apiculata Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Rhizophora mucronata Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC)
Rhizophora stylosa Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Sonneratia alba Sonneratiaceae Pagatpat Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Sonneratia caseolaris Kalongkalong Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Heritiera littoralis Sterculiaceae Dungon Tree LeastConcern (LC) /
Total, 18 Total, 8 Total, 13 Total, 1 Total, 12
Table 2. Species composition and phylogeneticaggregates of “semi-mangrove” speciesin Pasil
Species Families
Common Name Life Forms,
focus on Trees
Conservation Status,
IUCN, focus on NT
Conservation Actions
(local)
Sesuvium portulacastrum Alzoaceae Bilangbilang Herb Not Evaluated (NE)
Crinium asiaticum Amaryllidaceae Crinum Lily Herb Not Evaluated (NE)
Tabernaemontana pandacaqui Apocynaceae Alibotbot Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Wrightia pubescens Lanite Tree Least Concern (LC)
Cocos nucefira Arecaceae Lubi Palm Not Evaluated (NE)
Finlaysonia obovata Asclepiadaceae Tulus-baybay Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Calatropis gigantean Not Evaluated (NE)
Wedelia biflora Asteraceae Herb Not Evaluated (NE)
Carmona retusa Boraginaceae Cha Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Talisay Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Ipomoea pescarpae Convolvulaceae Palangpalang Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Erythrina variegate Dapdap Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Milletia pinnata Bani Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Prosopis juliflora Roma Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Vigna marina Beach Pea Shrub Least Concern (LC)
Jatropha gossypifolia Euphorbiaceae Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Scaevola taccada Goodinaceae Bokabok Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) /
Callophyllum inophyllum Guttifereae Dancalan Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) /
Barringtonia asiatica Lecythidaceae Bulobitoon Tree Least Concern (LC) /
Talipariti tiliaceum Malvaceae Malibago Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Ficus septica Moraceae Labnog Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Pandanus tectorius Pandanaceae Pandan Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Acrostichum aureum Pteridaceae Palaypay Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Morinda citrifolia Rubiaceae Apatot Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Clerodendrum inerme Verbenaceae Wild jasmine Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Premna odorata Alagao Vine Not Evaluated (NE)
Total, 26 Total, 19 Total, 6 Total, 0 Total, 3
Table 3. Species composition and phylogenetic aggregates of “mangrove associated species” in Pasil
Species Families Local Name, Tree Life Forms,
ConservationStatus, IUCN
Red List, NT
Conservation
Actions
Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae Manga, pahu Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Spondias purporea Sarguelas Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Annona muricata Annonaceae Babana Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Annona squamosal Atis Tree Least Concern (LC)
Colocasia esculenta Araceae Gabi Herb Not Evaluated (NE) /
Chromolaena odorata Asteraceae Hagonoy Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
Bixa Orellana Bixaceae Estewetes Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Carica papaya Caricaceae Kapayas Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Muntingia calabura Elaeocaepaceae Sarisa, Datilis Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Antidesma bunuis Euphorbiaceae Bugnay Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Cassia alata Fabaceaea Palotsina Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) /
Glirizidia sepium
Madre de
cacao
Shrub
Not Evaluated (NE)
Pithecellobium dulce Kamunsil Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Tamarindus indicus Sambag Tree Least Concern (LC)
Persea Americana Lauraceae Avocado Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Ceiba pentandra Malvaceae Doldol Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Neem Tree Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Sandoricum koetjape Santol Tree Least Concern (LC)
Swietenia mahogany Mahogani Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Albizia saman Mimosacaea Akasya Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Acacia mangium Acacia Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Leucaena leucocephala Aghu/Ipil ipil Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Moringa oleifera Moringaceae Balungay Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Artocarpus heterophyllus Moraceae Langka Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Psydium guajava Myrtaceae Bayabas Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Syzygium aqueum Tambis Shrub Least Concern (LC)
Syzygium cumini Lomboy Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Averrhoa bilimbi Oxalidaceae Iba Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Averrhoa carambola Galangan Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Peperomia pellucida Piperaceae Pansitpansitan Not Evaluated (NE)
Citrus microcarpa Rutaceae Kalamunding Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
Citrus maxima Kabugao Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Chrysophyllum cainito Sapotaceae Star apple Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Manilkara zapota Chico Tree Not Evaluated (NE)
Gmelina arborea Verbenaceae Germilina Tree Not Evaluated (NE) /
Stachytarpheta jamaicenses Sentimiento Herb Not Evaluated (NE)
Total, 36 Total,22 Total, 27 Total, 0 Total, 3
Table 4. Mangrovefloral diversity in Pasil
Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Simpson Diversity
Index (DI)
Simpson Reciprocal
Index (RI)
Sampling site 1
A. marina 38 0 129 167
X. mollucensis 0 5 0 5
E. agalocha 2 0 0 2
R. stylosa 2 2 0 4
R. mucronata 11 33 0 44
B. cylindrical 8 0 50 58
Total 61 Total 40 Total 179 280 0.5705 2.3281
Sampling site 2
A. marina 43 0 143 186
R. apiculata 8 0 13 21
A. corniculatum 2 4 0 6
B. cylindrical 8 10 53 71
R. mucronata 23 0 77 100
Total 84 Total 14 Total 286 Total, 384 0.6583 2.9265
Sampling site 3
A. marina 23 0 138 161
X. molucensis 0 4 0 4
E. agalocha 4 0 0 4
R. stylosa 11 0 5 16
R. mucronata 10 0 8 18
A. corniculatum 28 0 64 92
C. decandra 32 0 60 92
S. alba 8 3 17 28
L. racemosa 5 0 0 5
Total 121 Total 7 Total 292 Total 420 0.746 3.9366
Total Diversity Value 0.6425 2.7969
Density, Dominance, and Importance. Of
the 934 surveyed mature mangrove plants, 55%
were A. marina, 17% R. mucronata, 10% A.
corniculatum, and 10% C. decandra. The rest of
the plants found within the sampled quadrats
were S. alba, R. stylosa, L. racemosa, E. agallocha,
and X. mollucensis, except for L. racemosa and S.
alba that were absent in the midstream. The
midstream however is composed mainly of old
mangrove growth and was observed to be heavily
populated by humans. These conditions
prevented rehabilitation efforts by the
community. The Avicceniaceae A. marina, a
characteristic mangrove plant of the mid
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
intertidal section was the most frequently
observed tree. However, the wide canopies of tall
and mostly mature R. mucronata trees covered
the largest total area of 952.49 m2
against the
155.55 m2
covered by A. marina. The large trees
R. mucronata is dominating the Pasil mangrove at
65%. The 104 calculated importance value for R.
mucronata indicates the structural importance of
this species in a stand of 9 mixed species surveyed
within the sampled quadrats. The dominance of
R. mucronata is largely supported by Melana,
Atchue III, Yao, Edwards, Melana and Gonzalez
(2000) and Walters (2006) reporting that the
Philippine mangrove is predominated by species
from the Rhizophoraceae family. Explaining to
the dominance is the propagule viviparity of R.
mucronata that can be picked off from the
branches when ripe and planted directly in the
mud.
Table 5. Mangrovefloral speciesdensity,dominance,and importance in the lower, mid, and upper section ofPasil mangrove
Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Average
Crown
Diameter
Total Area
Covered
Relative
Frequency (%)
Relative
Density (%)
Relative
Dominance (%)
Importance
Value
Sampling Site 1
A. marina 38 0 129 167 1.42 60.18 25 60 11 95
X. molucensis 0 5 0 5 0.00 0.00 25 02 00 27
E. agalocha 2 0 0 2 3.98 24.88 08 01 04 13
R. stylosa 2 2 0 4 3.90 23.89 08 01 04 14
R. mucronata 11 33 0 44 5.71 281.68 25 16 50 91
B. cylindrical 8 0 50 58 5.20 169.90 08 21 30 59
Total 61 40 179 280 100 100 100 300
Sampling Site 2
A. marina 43 0 143 186 1.34 60.64 27 48 08 84
R. apiculata 8 0 13 21 3.1 60.38 18 05 08 32
A. corniculatum 2 4 0 6 0.81 1.03 09 02 00 11
B. cylindrical 8 10 53 71 5.1 163.43 18 18 22 59
R. mucronata 23 0 77 100 4.98 448.00 27 26 61 114
Total 84 14 286 384 100 100 100 300
Sampling site 3
A. marina 23 0 138 161 1.38 34.40 13 38 06 57
X. molucensis 0 4 0 4 0 0.00 09 01 00 10
E. agalocha 4 0 0 4 3.98 49.76 09 01 09 18
R. stylosa 11 0 5 16 3.45 102.83 13 04 18 35
R. mucronata 10 0 8 18 5.25 216.48 13 04 38 56
A. corniculatum 28 0 64 92 0.95 19.85 13 22 04 38
C. decandra 32 0 60 92 0.98 24.14 13 22 04 39
S. alba 8 3 17 28 4.2 110.84 13 07 20 39
L. racemosa 5 0 0 5 1.2 5.65 04 01 01 07
Total 121 7 292 420 100 100 100 300
Table 6. Mangrove floral speciesdensity,dominance, and importanceofPasil mangrove
Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Average
Crown
Diameter
Total Area
Covered
(m2)
Relative
Frequency
(%)
Relative
Density
Relative
Dominance
Importance
Value
A. marina 104 0 410 514 1.38 155.55 22 55 11 88
X. molucensis 0 9 0 9 0 0.00 12 1 0* 13
E. agalocha 6 0 0 6 3.98 74.65 7 1 5 13
R. stylosa 13 2 5 20 3.45 121.53 10 2 8 20
R. mucronata 44 33 85 162 5.25 952.49 22 17 65 104
A. corniculatum 30 4 64 98 0.95 21.26 10 10 1 22
C. decandra 32 0 60 92 0.98 24.14 7 10 2 19
S. alba 8 3 17 28 4.2 110.84 7 3 8 18
L. racemosa 5 0 0 5 1.2 5.65 2 1 0* 3
Total 242 51 641 934 100 100 100
*less than 1 dominance value
Linking Species and Conservation Action
for Pasil Mangrove. In a series of meetings
conducted, the management paradigm shifts
from ecological rehabilitation to species-based
conservation approach allowed the CHMSC-COF
RDU and PEARL to partner in maintaining the
health and integrity of Pasil mangrove. Twelve
(12) species of “true mangroves”, three (3) “semi-
mangroves, and three (3) associated species were
grown in the community-based mangrove
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
nursery located in CHMSC-COF. These nursery-
grown seeds were out-planted in Pasil based on
its ecological criteria and zonation. Both the B.
gymneroza and C. tagal being absent in Pasil
mangrove during the conduct of 2007 species
inventory (unpublished report) were introduced
in Pasil. The propagules were gathered from
Hinobaan and fom Sipalay by some researchers.
The “true mangrove” species like B. sexangula, R.
apiculata, R. stylosa, and B. cylindrica were
observed to slightly increase in number after
including the species for species-based
conservation. The Near Threatened, C. decandra
was on top priority for Species-Based
Community-Based Conservation based from
prioritization criteria advanced by IUCN. The
other reasons that necessitates highest
conservation priority for C.decandra were: its
paramount bio-potentials as anti-inflammatory
(Hossain, 2011), antidiarrheal, (Manilal, 2012),
antioxidant, antidiabetic, antimicrobial (Hossain
2012), anti-carcinogenic (Manilal, 2011), and
antihistaminic (Tsujiyama 2012); IUCN NT
conservation value and; availability of seeds and
seed collection areas. All the candidate species
were profiled according to ecology and biology.
Proposed Pasil Mangrove Diversity Park, the
species-based approach is towards ecological
landscaping. On-going studies on species-based
conservation are being proposed and conducted
and some information products were presented
and published in local and international fora and
journals.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The “areas of importance” are quantified
on the basis of the species they possess and
“conservation schemes” are assessed on how
many species are preserved in the area (Agapow,
Bininda-Emonds, Crandall, Gittleman, Mace,
Marshall, and Purvis, 2004). It is in the context of
how many species preserved in the area that this
floristic data were used to conserve mangrove
floral species in Pasil. The use of measures other
than species counts will force managers and
conservationists to ask what it is that we are trying
to conserve (Agapow, Bininda-Emonds, Crandall,
Gittleman, Mace, Marshall, Purvis, 2004). Species
composition and species diversity may be easy to
measure, but it is far from clear that they are
precisely what needs saving. Therefore any
attempt to abolish the use of species for
conservation will sacrifice the usefulness of
species to measure species diversity. The links of
species and conservation has implications for
ecosystem services that would in turn benefit the
local villagers. Local conservationists and
resource managers should, however never forget
that the mangrove floral species are just one of
the ecosystems components and conserving the
species could possibly attract more floral and
faunal species. Clear, the ecological aspect of
species in the ecosystem shall be understood as
well. This implies planning of periodic and
comparative assessment of both floral and faunal
species of Pasil mangrove.
CONCLUSION
The Pasil mangrove is probably
representative for the mangrove communities in
the coastal districts of Southern Negros
Occidental province. There are four reasons that
could be pointed out: a) Pasil mangrove is a more
stable ecosystem evidenced from this present
study; b) Pasil mangrove is centrally located in the
southern coastal district; c) some mangrove
researchers bring with them propagules and
seeds and sow them in Pasil; and d) the
representative soil types and the wet
characteristics of mudflat and estuary may have
supported the germination, growth, and
establishment of mangroves in Pasil. But looking
at the data, only few of the recruitment from
wildlings was observed and only few species
thrive in the area hence, an action-oriented type
of conservation is needed – hence the adaptation
of Species-based conservation approach.
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
Currently, there seems to be a major
paradigmshift reported in the many conservation
activities on how we approach species
conservation. There might have several terms
commonly used to describe this effort, but the
simplest is perhaps “community-based species-
based conservation”, which is a conservation
discussion and decisions done at the local level.
Community involvement potentially lead to more
informed decision-making and it help reduce
costly project designs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Although this report convinced the
implementers and the PO partner that species
conservation and community involvement works,
a critical examination of the approach is to be
examined further. For a more lasting and
meaningful conservation action, it is
recommended that: a) floral and faunal and
ecological assessment of Pasil mangrove shall be
done every year; b) implementers need to clarify
some issues on species-based conservation
approach; and c) future reports to include social
measures like stakeholders’ attitude,
participation, and learning.
LITERATURE CITED
Agapow, P.M., O.R.P. Bininda-Emonds, K.A.
Crandall, J.L. Gittleman, G.M. Mace, J.C.
Marshall, A. Purvis. 2004. The Impact of
Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies. The
Quarterly Review of Biology, June 2004, Vol.
79, No. 2
Basha, S.C. 1992. Mangroves of Kerala- A fast
disappearing asset, Indian forester. 120:2
pp.175-189.
Brown. 1998. The political ecology of biodiversity,
conservation and development in Nepal’s
Terai: Confused meanings, means and ends.
Ecological Economics 24., pp73-87.
Calumpong, H. C. and Menez, E. G., (1996), Field
Guide to the Common Mangroves,
Seagrasses and Algae of the Philippines.
Bookmark Inc.,
Makati City, Philippines.
Chen, L., W. Wang, and G. Lin. 2009. Recent
progresses in mangrove conservation,
restoration and research in China. Journal of
Plant
Ecology. 2:2, pp.45–54.
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001). Changes in
marine communities: an approach to
statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd
edition, PRIMER‐E: Plymouth.
Cunha-Lignon, M., M. Kampel, J. Flandroy, R.P.
Menghini, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2012.
Urban mangrove dynamics under increasing
anthropogenic pressure:analysis of remote
sensing data and Brazilian legislation. In
Dahdouh-Guebas, F. and B. Satyanarayana
(Eds.). Proceedings of the International
Conference: Meeting on Mangrove ecology,
functioning and Management (MMM3).
2012, Galle, Sri Lanka
Ekko C. van der Lerland. 2000. Ecological
economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific
integration for management and policy.
Ecological
Economics, Specia; issue, 35 : pp 7-35
Field C.B., J.G. Osborn, L.L. Hoffman, J.F.
Polsemberg, D.D. Ackerly, J.A. Berry, O.
Bjorkman, A. Held, P.A. Matson, H.A.
Monney. 1998. Mangrove Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Function. Global Ecology and
Biogeography Letters (8:7) pp3-14.
George, A.L., and R.L. Mayden. 2005. Species
Concepts and the Endangered Species Act:
How a Valid Biological Definition of Species
Enhances the Legal Protection of
Biodiversity. Natural Resources Journal, Vol
45
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. “Quantifying
Biodiversity:Procedures and Pitfalls in the
Measurement and Comparison of Species
Richness”, Ecology Letters 4: 379‐391.
Hossain, H., M. Hassan, I.A. Jahan, I. Nimmi, and A.
Islam. 2012. Antidiarrhoeal Activity, Nitric
Oxide Scavenging and Total Tannin Content
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
from the Bark of Ceriops Decandra (Griff.)
Ding Hou. IJPSR, Vol. 3, Issue 05
Jayatissa, L. P., F. Dahdouh-Guebas, and N.
Koedam. 2002. A review of the floral
composition and distribution of mangroves
in Sri Lanka. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society. Vol. 138, pp29–43.
Joshi, P.C. 2007. Community structure and
habitat selection of butterflies in Rajaji
National Park, a moist deciduous forest in
Uttaranchal, India: Tropical Ecology 48(1):
119-123.
Manilal A, Sujith S, kiran GS, Selvin J, shakir C.
2009. Biopotential of mangroves collected
from the Southwest Coast of India. Global J.
Biotech. Biochem. 4: 59-65
Melana, D.M., J. Atchue III, C.E. Yao, R. Edwards,
E.E. Melana and H.I Gonzalez. 2000.
Mangrove Management
Handbook.Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Manila, Philippines
through the Coastal Resource Management
Project, Cebu City, Philippines. 96p.
Nagelkerkena, I.,S.J.M. Blaberb, S. Bouillonc, P.
Greene, M. Haywoodf, L.G. Kirtong , J.O.
Meyneckeh, J. Pawliki, H.M. Penrosej, A.
Sasekumark, P.J. Somerfieldl. 2008. The
habitat function Hernández-Cornejo, R., N.
Koedam, A. Ruiz Luna, M. Troell, and F.
Dahdouh-Guebas. 2005. Remote sensing
and ethnobotanical assessment of the
mangrove forest chang
Lindenmayer, D.B., C.R. Margules, and D.B.
Botkin. 2000. Indicators for Bilogically
Sustainable Forest anagement.Conservation
Biology, 14(4) of mangroves for terrestrial
and marine fauna: A review. Aquatic Botany
89 (2008) 155–18
Offenberg, J. 2008. Mangrove Animal-Plant
Interactions and their Application to
Management.In:Scientific and Technical
Symposium on Sustainable Mangrove
Ecosystem Management. Department of
Marine & Coastal Resources (DMCR) and
Ministry of Environment and Natural
Resources, Thailand.
Padial JM, Castroviejo-Fisher S, Köhler J, Vilá C,
Chaparro JC, De la Riva I. 2009. Deciphering
the products of evolution at the species
level: the need for an integrative taxonomy.
Zoologica Scripta, 38:431-447.
Payton, I.J., M. Fenner, and W.G. Lee. 2002.
Keystone species: the concept and its
relevance for conservation management in
New Zealand. Science for Conservation 203,
26p.
Primavera, J.H., R.B. Sadaba, M.J.H.L. Lebata, J.P.
Altamirano. 2004. Handbook of Mangroves
in the Philippines – Panay.
Polidoro BA, Carpenter KE, Collins L, Duke NC,
Ellison AM, et al. (2010). The Loss of Species:
Mangrove Extinction Risk and Geographic
Areas of Global Concern. PLoS ONE 5(4)
Ram, A.T. and C.S. Shaji. 2013. Diversity and
Distribution of Mangroves in Kumbalam
Island of Kerala, India. IOSR Journal Of
Environmental Science, Toxicology And
Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) 4:4 pp. 18-
26.
Ramesh, T., K.J. Hussain, K.K. Satpathy, and M.
Selvanayagam. 2013. Community
composition and distribution of
herpetofauna at Kalpakkam Nuclear
campus, Southern India. Herpetology Notes,
volume 6: 343-351
Shanker, K., Hiremath, A., Bawa, K. (2005): Linking
Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihoods in
India. Plos Biology 3: 1878-1880
Snedaker. S. C. and Snedaker. J. G. (Eds) (1984).
The Mangrove ecosystem: research
methods. Unesco.
Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, Umbrellas, And
Keystones: Is Single-Species Management
Passi In The Landscape Era? Biological
Conservation 83:3, pp. 247-257.
Tsujiyama, I., S. Mubassara, H. Aoshima. 2012.
Anti-histamine release and anti-
inflammatory activities of acqueous extracts
of citrus fruits peels. Oriental Pharmacy and
Experimental Medicine: 1-6
Turner, R. K., Jeroem C. J. M van der Bergh, Tore
Soderques, Aat Barendregt, Jan vander
Straaten, Edward Malthy, Walters, B.B. 2004.
Local management of mangrove forests in
the Philippines: successful conservation or
Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea
Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links
Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015
efficient resource exploitation? Hum. Ecol.
32, 177–193.
Vyas, S.J., and A. J. Joshi. 2013. Study of Diversity
Indices and Ecological Characteristic of
Coastal Flora in ‘Bhal’ Region (Gujarat).
International Journal of Plant, Animal and
Environmental Sciences 3:1, pp 261-267.
Zachariasa, M.A., and J.C. Roff. 2001. Use of Focal
Species In Marine Conservation and
Management: A Review and Critique of the
Aquatic Conservation: Marine And
Freshwater Ecosystems 11, pp59–76.

More Related Content

What's hot

Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
Innspub Net
 
Genetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
Genetic implications of forest management in the MediterraneanGenetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
Genetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou
 
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannas
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannasAlien grasses in_brazilian_savannas
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannasFilipe de Oliveira
 
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity Conservation in ...
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity  Conservation in ...The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity  Conservation in ...
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity Conservation in ...
Sryahwa Publications
 
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Innspub Net
 
Syndromes
SyndromesSyndromes
Spring19 Palm Tree Proposal
Spring19 Palm Tree ProposalSpring19 Palm Tree Proposal
Spring19 Palm Tree Proposal
JustinTirrell1
 
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake pointDistribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
Alexander Decker
 
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
The ecology and evolution of seaweed
The ecology and evolution of seaweedThe ecology and evolution of seaweed
The ecology and evolution of seaweed
Dello Asayr DC
 
Schundler UBC Polypore Proposal
Schundler UBC Polypore ProposalSchundler UBC Polypore Proposal
Schundler UBC Polypore Proposal
Greg Schundler
 
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida Entomologist
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida EntomologistKoi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida Entomologist
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida EntomologistSandy Koi
 
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concerns
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concernsKoi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concerns
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concernsSandy Koi
 
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atala
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atalaKoi_Nectar sources for E. atala
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atalaSandy Koi
 
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
IOSRJPBS
 
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
Alison Specht
 
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
Diraviam Jayaraj
 
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seedsInfluence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
AI Publications
 
JJC_CV_1Sep2020
JJC_CV_1Sep2020JJC_CV_1Sep2020
JJC_CV_1Sep2020
JaimeCoon
 
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Innspub Net
 

What's hot (20)

Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
Resource management of coconut crab (Birgus latro) in liwo island, north malu...
 
Genetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
Genetic implications of forest management in the MediterraneanGenetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
Genetic implications of forest management in the Mediterranean
 
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannas
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannasAlien grasses in_brazilian_savannas
Alien grasses in_brazilian_savannas
 
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity Conservation in ...
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity  Conservation in ...The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity  Conservation in ...
The Role of Indigenous People Knowledge in the Biodiversity Conservation in ...
 
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
 
Syndromes
SyndromesSyndromes
Syndromes
 
Spring19 Palm Tree Proposal
Spring19 Palm Tree ProposalSpring19 Palm Tree Proposal
Spring19 Palm Tree Proposal
 
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake pointDistribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
Distribution of macrozoobenthos in river narmada near water intake point
 
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
The Role of Soil Organisms and Functions in different Coconut based Multiple ...
 
The ecology and evolution of seaweed
The ecology and evolution of seaweedThe ecology and evolution of seaweed
The ecology and evolution of seaweed
 
Schundler UBC Polypore Proposal
Schundler UBC Polypore ProposalSchundler UBC Polypore Proposal
Schundler UBC Polypore Proposal
 
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida Entomologist
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida EntomologistKoi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida Entomologist
Koi & Daniels_2015_New Atala Life history_Florida Entomologist
 
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concerns
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concernsKoi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concerns
Koi_2015_Bulldozers vs. butterflies-conservation concerns
 
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atala
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atalaKoi_Nectar sources for E. atala
Koi_Nectar sources for E. atala
 
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
Checklist of plants in the University Botanic Garden of Maseno and their sign...
 
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
Origin and congruence of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in ...
 
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
Ecology and biodiversity of agriculturally important rice field arthropods
 
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seedsInfluence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
Influence of some site factors on germinative parameters of Quercus seeds
 
JJC_CV_1Sep2020
JJC_CV_1Sep2020JJC_CV_1Sep2020
JJC_CV_1Sep2020
 
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
 

Similar to Pasil Mangrove Flora Species and Conservation Links

Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
Innspub Net
 
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
AI Publications
 
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippinesVegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
Alexander Decker
 
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
Innspub Net
 
Gjesm150171451593800
Gjesm150171451593800Gjesm150171451593800
Gjesm150171451593800
GJESM Publication
 
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
AbdullaAlAsif1
 
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015Gabrielle Duong
 
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
AI Publications
 
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Open Access Research Paper
 
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
Angelo Mark Walag
 
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCEPHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
AJHSSR Journal
 
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich BukidnonBiodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
QuinoneMagan
 
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, GujaratDiversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
SSR Institute of International Journal of Life Sciences
 
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
UniversitasGadjahMada
 
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphologyIdentification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
Safi Ur Rehman Qamar
 
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
Open Access Research Paper
 
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
Innspub Net
 
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, KarnatakaIngoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
IOSR Journals
 
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, PhilippinesBeetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
ijtsrd
 
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
Premier Publishers
 

Similar to Pasil Mangrove Flora Species and Conservation Links (20)

Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
Species Diversity and Above-ground Carbon Stock Assessments in Selected Mangr...
 
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
Mangrove ecology and species distribution along the Gorai Creek of Mumbai coa...
 
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippinesVegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
Vegetation analysis of the pasonanca natural park, zamboanga city, philippines
 
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
Species diversity and functional groups of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ...
 
Gjesm150171451593800
Gjesm150171451593800Gjesm150171451593800
Gjesm150171451593800
 
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
Benthic macrofaunal assemblage in seagrass-mangrove complex and adjacent ecos...
 
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015
Junger and Duong Butterfly Report 2015
 
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
Termite Mounds’ Diversity and Distribution: A Study at Jnanabharathi, Bangalo...
 
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
 
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
Diversity and dispersion patterns of echinoderms in Babanlagan, Talisayan, Mi...
 
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCEPHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY IN A GLANCE
 
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich BukidnonBiodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
Biodiversity Status of Flora and Fauna in Mt. Palaopao, Manilo Fortich Bukidnon
 
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, GujaratDiversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
Diversity of Halophytes in Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
 
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
Free Range Livestock Influence Species Richness, Occupancy, and Daily Behavio...
 
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphologyIdentification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
Identification of Species of genus Zootecus on the basis of morphology
 
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
Mangrove Flora in the Coastal Municipalities of Sultan Kudarat Province, Phil...
 
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
Status of seagrass ecosystem in Kauswagan, Lanao Del Norte and Laguindingan, ...
 
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, KarnatakaIngoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
Ingoldian Fungi in Kigga Falls, Chikmagalur District, Karnataka
 
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, PhilippinesBeetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
Beetles in Selected Barangays of Catarman, Northern Samar, Philippines
 
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
Trends in Macrophyte Diversity in Anthropogenic Perturbed Lentic Ecosystems w...
 

Pasil Mangrove Flora Species and Conservation Links

  • 1. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 ISSN 2094 - 4454 Vol. 7, No. 1, 2015 Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Andrew D. Ordonio1, Vernard M. Martinez2, Rodrigo G. Paglomutan, Jr3. and Mac Edmund G. Gimotea4 1Facultyof Fisheries, 2Student of Fisheries, 3RDU Data Analyst, 4RDU Research Assistant Abstract. The mangrove of Pasil was surveyed to document the community- academe partnership on mangrove assessment and conservation. The baseline data will serve any future species and diversity monitoring and for future development proposals appropriate for community-based species-based mangrove conservation in Pasil. The “true mangroves” of Pasil is composed of 19 species belonging to 9 families. The 8 species representing 44% of the total mangrove species in Pasil belong to Family Rhizophoraceae. The plants classified as“semi-mangrove” is composed of 26 species belonging to 8 families. The “mangrove associated species” is composed of 36 species belonging to 22 families. On floral diversity, a total of nine (9) “true mangrove” species were found in the three sampling sites. A. marina is a common species in the three streams while C. decandra, S. alba, and L. racemosa are unique species of the lower stream. The lower stream that serves both the inlet and the outlet of the estuarine water is 74.65% species diverse compared with the diversity of mangrove floral species in the mid (65.83%) and in the upper (57.05%) streams. A. marina is the most dominant species in all sites. The Community-based Species-based Approach to Conservation largely focused on the Near Threatened mangrove, C. decandra. In “community-based species-based conservation”, the community involvement potentially lead to more informed decision-making and it help reduce costly project designs. This report convinced the implementers and the PO partner that species conservation and community involvement works. The continued floral and faunal and ecological assessment of Pasil mangrove is recommended. Keywords: mangrove assessment, species conservation, foral composition, diversity, community action CHMSCCOFRDU Received final draft: February 20, 2015 Peer reviewed: January 10, 2015 Received manuscript: October 20,2014
  • 2. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 INTRODUCTION One of the features of the coastal village Pasil in Enclaro, Binalbagan, Negros Occidental, Philippines is the presence of an estuary, mudflats and abandoned fishponds that supports some species and some communities of mangrove. The important characteristics of the halophytic mangrove is the enormous biological diversity which refers to the diversity of various species of living organisms, plants and animals, the presence of various ecosystem services, and diversity valued by humans (Brown, 1998; Field, Osborn, Hoffman, Polsemberg, Ackerly, Berry, Bjorkman, Held, Matson, Monney, 1998; Turner, Jeroem, van der Bergh, Soderques, Barendregt, van der Straaten, Malthy, van der Lerland, 2000; Shanker, Hiremath and Bawa, 2005; Diaz, Fargione, Chapin and Tilman, 2006). Value of Species to conservation. Considered “currency or indicators of biology” (Soltis and Gitzendanner, 1999; Gotelli and Colwell, 2001), species are the basic units of analysis in conservation biology (Joshi, 2007; Padial, Castroviejo-Fisher, Kohler, Vila, Chaparro and De la Riva, 2009; Ramesh, Hussain, Satpathy and Selvanayagam, 2013). Such species diversity and ecological services of mangrove constitute the natural resource entitlements of the coastal villagers (Hernández-Cornejo, Koedam, Ruiz Luna, Troell, and Dahdouh-Guebas, 2005). Mangrove fulfills many necessary functions in the field of production, environment protection and social values (Cunha-Lignon, Kampel, Flandroy, Menghini, and Dahdouh- Guebas, 2012). However, mangroves are increasingly threatened and their survival is at great risk (Primavera, Sadaba, Lebata, Altamirano, 2004; FAO, 2007; Chen, Wang, and Lin, 2009). Indeed, this would lead to the rapid increase in the number of Threatened mangrove species resulting to the local extinction of some rare species (Cunha-Lignon, et al., 2012). Knowledge on the role of mangrove species provides guidance on how best the species could be conserved. First, mangrove floral species are the foundation of the mangrove and it provides various habitats for the flora and fauna that together shape a unique ecosystem and form the basis of all other mangrove returns (Ellison, Farnsworth, and Merkt. 1999; Offenberg 2008). Second, a species diverse mangrove area is acting as corridor for immigrants from outside mangrove areas having lower number of species (Nagelkerkena, Blaberb, Bouillonc, Greene, Haywoodf, Kirtong, Meyneckeh, Pawliki, Penrosej, Sasekumark, Somerfieldl, 2008; Polidoro, Carpenter , Collins, Duke, Ellison et al., 2010)). And third, the presence of species in an ecosystem indicates the presence of a set of other species and whose absence indicates the lack of that entire set of species (Lindenmayer, Margules, and Botkin 2000). Single-species Approach to conservation. Knowledge of the exact floral species composition and diversity is an important prerequisite to understand conservation (Jayatissa, Dahdouh-Guebas, and Koedam, 2002). The goal of conservation is to maintain biological diversity and the ecosystem services to humans. Though buzzword in mangrove conservation, conservation managers are faced with complexities such as limited resources to conserve species and the inability to manage all aspects of biodiversity. The question on how best the species could be conserved has led to a paradigm that focused on single-species in setting actions (Simberloff, 1998; Zachariasa and Roff, 2001; George and Mayden, 2005; Payton, Fenner, and Lee, 2002). The single-species approach would seem a perfect context for mangrove conservation in Pasil. In terms of utility of the approach in conservation, knowledge on species composition and species diversity will help analyze what species can be related to habitat types, which can, in turn, be spatially mapped. This fundamental prerequisite for species-based conservation
  • 3. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 approach (Zachariasa, and Roff, 2001) would succeed if scientifically based protocols will be examined and adapted. Acceptable assessment results could thus be used to link species and conservation. (Dahdouh-Guebas, Verheyden, De Genst, Hettiarachchi and Koedam, 2000). Objectives of the Study. The mangrove of Pasil was surveyed to document the community- academe partnership (primarily lead by the students) on mangrove assessment and conservation. With this action-oriented objective, describing Pasil mangrove in Binalbagan, Negros Occidental Philippines was done focusing on two major axes: 1) mangrove structural assessment; and 2) conservation initiatives done for Pasil mangrove. The first specific objective was to assess the mangrove of Pasil in terms of 1) floral species composition within the study area and 2) species diversity (D) and importance value (IV) within each quadrat. The baseline data will serve any future species and diversity monitoring and ecological landscape management for Pasil mangrove. The second specific objective is to describe the community-based species-based conservation action implemented by the CHMSC- COF RDU and by the PO conservation partner, the PEARL. This information will be used for future development proposals appropriate for Community-based Species-based mangrove conservation in Pasil. METHODOLOGY Study Site. The Pasil mangrove lies within the coastal Enclaro, Binalbagan in the 5th Congressional District of Negros Occidental, Philippines. The mangrove community is backed by estuaries and intertidal mudflats frequented by tides that empties at the southern section of Enclaro Creek. The soil substrate within the mangrove area is generally muddy from the mid to upper section and generally sandy at the lower section. Floristic Data Collection. The mangrove assessment was carried out over a 10-day period, which included group discussion on the survey methodology and was accomplished by a 10- member team which included 5 peoples’ organization (PO) members and 5 CHMSC-COF RDU team of researchers. All members have participated in several mangrove assessment projects. Floral Species Assessment. Specimen collections were made at the natural habitat of the study are. Small branches of the plants with leaves and some flowers and fruits were collected and packed separately in polyethylene bags and in large containers and were brought to the RDU laboratory. The morphologic diagnosis, species identification, and conservation status followed several reports and field guides example Primavera, Sadaba, Lebata, Altamirano (2004), Calumpong and Menez (1996). Aside specimen collection within each quadrat, (i) village walk; (ii) transect walk; (iii) and key informant (KI) help were done. In this study, the KI is a person who had a great deal with the Pasil mangrove resource. Categorization of Mangrove Species. Following Basha (1992) and Ram and Shaji (2013), the mangrove with strongly marked characteristics is grouped under “true mangroves”. There are also plants with less strongly marked characteristics, which are known as “semi-mangrove”. There is yet another group of plants, which grow adjoining the mangrove areas but thrive on the land which does not submerge by brackish water even during the high tides but can withstand some amount of brackish water stagnation for a short period. These can be grouped as “mangrove associated species”. Species Diversity and Importance Value. The three sampling stations were identified by the team as upper, mid, and lower streams. The location of the center of each sampling plot was randomly determined through random point generator using the crude map and the Google
  • 4. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 Earth map. Each site was further sub-divided into 3 randomly selected 10m x 10m sizes quadrats. The species present in the quadrats were identified and their numbers were recorded in a tabular column. The quantitative measures describing the analytical characteristics of the Pasil mangrove floral community includes diversity (D) and importance value (IV) of the species. Treatment of the Data. The widely used Simpson Diversity Index for comparing diversity between various sampling sites was used to measure diversity of true mangroves of Pasil. This index assumes that individuals are randomly sampled from an independently large population (Clarke and Warwick, 2001). Following Snedakar and Snedarker (1984) and Vyas and Joshi (2013), the density, relative density, basal area, dominance, and relative dominance of each species in every plot and the relative frequency of each species within the forest were calculated to determine the Importance Value (IV) of each species. The IV indicates the structural importance of a species within a stand of mixed species. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Floral Composition. The “true mangroves” of Pasil is composed of 19 species belonging to 9 families. The 8 species representing 44% of the total mangrove species in Pasil belong to Family Rhizophoraceae. The shrubby Acanthaceae, Acanthus volubilis although very few in number could still be found in the upper section growing in the fishpond dikes. The shrub Aegiceras corniculatum belonging to Family Myrsinaceae, usually thriving in the front zones was found growing in the lower section. The plants classified as“semi-mangrove” was composed of 26 species belonging to 8 families. The six species were described as trees. None of the semi-mangrove species was included in the IUCN Red List for Threatened species. The “mangrove associated species” was composed of 36 species belonging to 22 families. This group of plants is mostly trees and mostly introduced into the backyards of the villagers for food example the Family Anacardiaceae and for traditional medicine example, the plants belonging to Family Annonaceae. Floral Diversity. A total of nine (9) “true mangrove” species were found in the three sampling sites in Pasil. Nine of these species were observed at the lower stream, whereas only 6 and 5 species were observed at the midstream and at the upper stream, respectively. A. marina is a common species in the three streams while C. decandra, S. alba, and L. racemosa are unique species of the lower stream. The probability of the variation or diversity of species increases in the sampled quadrat from the lower to the upper stream. The species in the lower stream is 74.65% species diverse compared with the mid (65.83%) and in the upper (57.05%) streams. The A. marina was the most observed species in all sites. In the lower stream, the two other species mostly observed were A. corniculatum, C. decandra, and S. alba. In the midstream, the A.marina. R. mucronata and B. cylindrica were the mostly observed species. In the upper stream B. cylindrica population established along with A. marina and R. mucronata.
  • 5. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 Table 1. Species composition and phylogeneticaggregates of “true mangrove” speciesin Pasil Species Families Local Name, Life Forms, Trees ConservationStatus, IUCN Red List, NT Conservation Actions Acanthus volubilis Acanthaceae Ragoyroy Shrub LeastConcern (LC) Avicennia marina Avicenniaceae Bungalon Tree LeastConcern (LC) Avicennia rhumpiana Bungalon Tree Vulnerable (V) Lumnitzera racemosa Combretacea Tabao/culasi Shrub LeastConcern (LC) Excoecaria agallocha Euphorbiaceae Lipata/Alipata Tree LeastConcern (LC) Xylocarpus mollucensis Meliaceae Tabigi, Piagao Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Aegiceras corniculatum Myrsinaceae Saging-saging Shrub LeastConcern (LC) / Nypha fruticans Palmae Nipa Palm NotEvaluated (NE) Bruguiera cylindrical Rhizophoraceae Lapis-lapis Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Bruguiera gymneroza Pototan Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Bruguera sexangula Pototan Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Ceriops decandra Baras-baras Shrub Near Threatened (NT) / Ceriops tagal Tanggal Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Rhizophora apiculata Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Rhizophora mucronata Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC) Rhizophora stylosa Bakhaw Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Sonneratia alba Sonneratiaceae Pagatpat Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Sonneratia caseolaris Kalongkalong Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Heritiera littoralis Sterculiaceae Dungon Tree LeastConcern (LC) / Total, 18 Total, 8 Total, 13 Total, 1 Total, 12 Table 2. Species composition and phylogeneticaggregates of “semi-mangrove” speciesin Pasil Species Families Common Name Life Forms, focus on Trees Conservation Status, IUCN, focus on NT Conservation Actions (local) Sesuvium portulacastrum Alzoaceae Bilangbilang Herb Not Evaluated (NE) Crinium asiaticum Amaryllidaceae Crinum Lily Herb Not Evaluated (NE) Tabernaemontana pandacaqui Apocynaceae Alibotbot Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Wrightia pubescens Lanite Tree Least Concern (LC) Cocos nucefira Arecaceae Lubi Palm Not Evaluated (NE) Finlaysonia obovata Asclepiadaceae Tulus-baybay Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Calatropis gigantean Not Evaluated (NE) Wedelia biflora Asteraceae Herb Not Evaluated (NE) Carmona retusa Boraginaceae Cha Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Talisay Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Ipomoea pescarpae Convolvulaceae Palangpalang Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Erythrina variegate Dapdap Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Milletia pinnata Bani Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Prosopis juliflora Roma Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Vigna marina Beach Pea Shrub Least Concern (LC) Jatropha gossypifolia Euphorbiaceae Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Scaevola taccada Goodinaceae Bokabok Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) / Callophyllum inophyllum Guttifereae Dancalan Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) / Barringtonia asiatica Lecythidaceae Bulobitoon Tree Least Concern (LC) / Talipariti tiliaceum Malvaceae Malibago Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Ficus septica Moraceae Labnog Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Pandanus tectorius Pandanaceae Pandan Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Acrostichum aureum Pteridaceae Palaypay Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Morinda citrifolia Rubiaceae Apatot Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Clerodendrum inerme Verbenaceae Wild jasmine Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Premna odorata Alagao Vine Not Evaluated (NE) Total, 26 Total, 19 Total, 6 Total, 0 Total, 3 Table 3. Species composition and phylogenetic aggregates of “mangrove associated species” in Pasil Species Families Local Name, Tree Life Forms, ConservationStatus, IUCN Red List, NT Conservation Actions Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae Manga, pahu Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Spondias purporea Sarguelas Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Annona muricata Annonaceae Babana Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Annona squamosal Atis Tree Least Concern (LC) Colocasia esculenta Araceae Gabi Herb Not Evaluated (NE) / Chromolaena odorata Asteraceae Hagonoy Shrub Not Evaluated (NE)
  • 6. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 Bixa Orellana Bixaceae Estewetes Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Carica papaya Caricaceae Kapayas Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Muntingia calabura Elaeocaepaceae Sarisa, Datilis Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Antidesma bunuis Euphorbiaceae Bugnay Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Cassia alata Fabaceaea Palotsina Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) / Glirizidia sepium Madre de cacao Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Pithecellobium dulce Kamunsil Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Tamarindus indicus Sambag Tree Least Concern (LC) Persea Americana Lauraceae Avocado Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Ceiba pentandra Malvaceae Doldol Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Neem Tree Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Sandoricum koetjape Santol Tree Least Concern (LC) Swietenia mahogany Mahogani Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Albizia saman Mimosacaea Akasya Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Acacia mangium Acacia Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Leucaena leucocephala Aghu/Ipil ipil Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Moringa oleifera Moringaceae Balungay Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Artocarpus heterophyllus Moraceae Langka Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Psydium guajava Myrtaceae Bayabas Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Syzygium aqueum Tambis Shrub Least Concern (LC) Syzygium cumini Lomboy Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Averrhoa bilimbi Oxalidaceae Iba Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Averrhoa carambola Galangan Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Peperomia pellucida Piperaceae Pansitpansitan Not Evaluated (NE) Citrus microcarpa Rutaceae Kalamunding Shrub Not Evaluated (NE) Citrus maxima Kabugao Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Chrysophyllum cainito Sapotaceae Star apple Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Manilkara zapota Chico Tree Not Evaluated (NE) Gmelina arborea Verbenaceae Germilina Tree Not Evaluated (NE) / Stachytarpheta jamaicenses Sentimiento Herb Not Evaluated (NE) Total, 36 Total,22 Total, 27 Total, 0 Total, 3 Table 4. Mangrovefloral diversity in Pasil Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Simpson Diversity Index (DI) Simpson Reciprocal Index (RI) Sampling site 1 A. marina 38 0 129 167 X. mollucensis 0 5 0 5 E. agalocha 2 0 0 2 R. stylosa 2 2 0 4 R. mucronata 11 33 0 44 B. cylindrical 8 0 50 58 Total 61 Total 40 Total 179 280 0.5705 2.3281 Sampling site 2 A. marina 43 0 143 186 R. apiculata 8 0 13 21 A. corniculatum 2 4 0 6 B. cylindrical 8 10 53 71 R. mucronata 23 0 77 100 Total 84 Total 14 Total 286 Total, 384 0.6583 2.9265 Sampling site 3 A. marina 23 0 138 161 X. molucensis 0 4 0 4 E. agalocha 4 0 0 4 R. stylosa 11 0 5 16 R. mucronata 10 0 8 18 A. corniculatum 28 0 64 92 C. decandra 32 0 60 92 S. alba 8 3 17 28 L. racemosa 5 0 0 5 Total 121 Total 7 Total 292 Total 420 0.746 3.9366 Total Diversity Value 0.6425 2.7969 Density, Dominance, and Importance. Of the 934 surveyed mature mangrove plants, 55% were A. marina, 17% R. mucronata, 10% A. corniculatum, and 10% C. decandra. The rest of the plants found within the sampled quadrats were S. alba, R. stylosa, L. racemosa, E. agallocha, and X. mollucensis, except for L. racemosa and S. alba that were absent in the midstream. The midstream however is composed mainly of old mangrove growth and was observed to be heavily populated by humans. These conditions prevented rehabilitation efforts by the community. The Avicceniaceae A. marina, a characteristic mangrove plant of the mid
  • 7. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 intertidal section was the most frequently observed tree. However, the wide canopies of tall and mostly mature R. mucronata trees covered the largest total area of 952.49 m2 against the 155.55 m2 covered by A. marina. The large trees R. mucronata is dominating the Pasil mangrove at 65%. The 104 calculated importance value for R. mucronata indicates the structural importance of this species in a stand of 9 mixed species surveyed within the sampled quadrats. The dominance of R. mucronata is largely supported by Melana, Atchue III, Yao, Edwards, Melana and Gonzalez (2000) and Walters (2006) reporting that the Philippine mangrove is predominated by species from the Rhizophoraceae family. Explaining to the dominance is the propagule viviparity of R. mucronata that can be picked off from the branches when ripe and planted directly in the mud. Table 5. Mangrovefloral speciesdensity,dominance,and importance in the lower, mid, and upper section ofPasil mangrove Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Average Crown Diameter Total Area Covered Relative Frequency (%) Relative Density (%) Relative Dominance (%) Importance Value Sampling Site 1 A. marina 38 0 129 167 1.42 60.18 25 60 11 95 X. molucensis 0 5 0 5 0.00 0.00 25 02 00 27 E. agalocha 2 0 0 2 3.98 24.88 08 01 04 13 R. stylosa 2 2 0 4 3.90 23.89 08 01 04 14 R. mucronata 11 33 0 44 5.71 281.68 25 16 50 91 B. cylindrical 8 0 50 58 5.20 169.90 08 21 30 59 Total 61 40 179 280 100 100 100 300 Sampling Site 2 A. marina 43 0 143 186 1.34 60.64 27 48 08 84 R. apiculata 8 0 13 21 3.1 60.38 18 05 08 32 A. corniculatum 2 4 0 6 0.81 1.03 09 02 00 11 B. cylindrical 8 10 53 71 5.1 163.43 18 18 22 59 R. mucronata 23 0 77 100 4.98 448.00 27 26 61 114 Total 84 14 286 384 100 100 100 300 Sampling site 3 A. marina 23 0 138 161 1.38 34.40 13 38 06 57 X. molucensis 0 4 0 4 0 0.00 09 01 00 10 E. agalocha 4 0 0 4 3.98 49.76 09 01 09 18 R. stylosa 11 0 5 16 3.45 102.83 13 04 18 35 R. mucronata 10 0 8 18 5.25 216.48 13 04 38 56 A. corniculatum 28 0 64 92 0.95 19.85 13 22 04 38 C. decandra 32 0 60 92 0.98 24.14 13 22 04 39 S. alba 8 3 17 28 4.2 110.84 13 07 20 39 L. racemosa 5 0 0 5 1.2 5.65 04 01 01 07 Total 121 7 292 420 100 100 100 300 Table 6. Mangrove floral speciesdensity,dominance, and importanceofPasil mangrove Species Mature Saplings Seedlings Total Average Crown Diameter Total Area Covered (m2) Relative Frequency (%) Relative Density Relative Dominance Importance Value A. marina 104 0 410 514 1.38 155.55 22 55 11 88 X. molucensis 0 9 0 9 0 0.00 12 1 0* 13 E. agalocha 6 0 0 6 3.98 74.65 7 1 5 13 R. stylosa 13 2 5 20 3.45 121.53 10 2 8 20 R. mucronata 44 33 85 162 5.25 952.49 22 17 65 104 A. corniculatum 30 4 64 98 0.95 21.26 10 10 1 22 C. decandra 32 0 60 92 0.98 24.14 7 10 2 19 S. alba 8 3 17 28 4.2 110.84 7 3 8 18 L. racemosa 5 0 0 5 1.2 5.65 2 1 0* 3 Total 242 51 641 934 100 100 100 *less than 1 dominance value Linking Species and Conservation Action for Pasil Mangrove. In a series of meetings conducted, the management paradigm shifts from ecological rehabilitation to species-based conservation approach allowed the CHMSC-COF RDU and PEARL to partner in maintaining the health and integrity of Pasil mangrove. Twelve (12) species of “true mangroves”, three (3) “semi- mangroves, and three (3) associated species were grown in the community-based mangrove
  • 8. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 nursery located in CHMSC-COF. These nursery- grown seeds were out-planted in Pasil based on its ecological criteria and zonation. Both the B. gymneroza and C. tagal being absent in Pasil mangrove during the conduct of 2007 species inventory (unpublished report) were introduced in Pasil. The propagules were gathered from Hinobaan and fom Sipalay by some researchers. The “true mangrove” species like B. sexangula, R. apiculata, R. stylosa, and B. cylindrica were observed to slightly increase in number after including the species for species-based conservation. The Near Threatened, C. decandra was on top priority for Species-Based Community-Based Conservation based from prioritization criteria advanced by IUCN. The other reasons that necessitates highest conservation priority for C.decandra were: its paramount bio-potentials as anti-inflammatory (Hossain, 2011), antidiarrheal, (Manilal, 2012), antioxidant, antidiabetic, antimicrobial (Hossain 2012), anti-carcinogenic (Manilal, 2011), and antihistaminic (Tsujiyama 2012); IUCN NT conservation value and; availability of seeds and seed collection areas. All the candidate species were profiled according to ecology and biology. Proposed Pasil Mangrove Diversity Park, the species-based approach is towards ecological landscaping. On-going studies on species-based conservation are being proposed and conducted and some information products were presented and published in local and international fora and journals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The “areas of importance” are quantified on the basis of the species they possess and “conservation schemes” are assessed on how many species are preserved in the area (Agapow, Bininda-Emonds, Crandall, Gittleman, Mace, Marshall, and Purvis, 2004). It is in the context of how many species preserved in the area that this floristic data were used to conserve mangrove floral species in Pasil. The use of measures other than species counts will force managers and conservationists to ask what it is that we are trying to conserve (Agapow, Bininda-Emonds, Crandall, Gittleman, Mace, Marshall, Purvis, 2004). Species composition and species diversity may be easy to measure, but it is far from clear that they are precisely what needs saving. Therefore any attempt to abolish the use of species for conservation will sacrifice the usefulness of species to measure species diversity. The links of species and conservation has implications for ecosystem services that would in turn benefit the local villagers. Local conservationists and resource managers should, however never forget that the mangrove floral species are just one of the ecosystems components and conserving the species could possibly attract more floral and faunal species. Clear, the ecological aspect of species in the ecosystem shall be understood as well. This implies planning of periodic and comparative assessment of both floral and faunal species of Pasil mangrove. CONCLUSION The Pasil mangrove is probably representative for the mangrove communities in the coastal districts of Southern Negros Occidental province. There are four reasons that could be pointed out: a) Pasil mangrove is a more stable ecosystem evidenced from this present study; b) Pasil mangrove is centrally located in the southern coastal district; c) some mangrove researchers bring with them propagules and seeds and sow them in Pasil; and d) the representative soil types and the wet characteristics of mudflat and estuary may have supported the germination, growth, and establishment of mangroves in Pasil. But looking at the data, only few of the recruitment from wildlings was observed and only few species thrive in the area hence, an action-oriented type of conservation is needed – hence the adaptation of Species-based conservation approach.
  • 9. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 Currently, there seems to be a major paradigmshift reported in the many conservation activities on how we approach species conservation. There might have several terms commonly used to describe this effort, but the simplest is perhaps “community-based species- based conservation”, which is a conservation discussion and decisions done at the local level. Community involvement potentially lead to more informed decision-making and it help reduce costly project designs. RECOMMENDATIONS Although this report convinced the implementers and the PO partner that species conservation and community involvement works, a critical examination of the approach is to be examined further. For a more lasting and meaningful conservation action, it is recommended that: a) floral and faunal and ecological assessment of Pasil mangrove shall be done every year; b) implementers need to clarify some issues on species-based conservation approach; and c) future reports to include social measures like stakeholders’ attitude, participation, and learning. LITERATURE CITED Agapow, P.M., O.R.P. Bininda-Emonds, K.A. Crandall, J.L. Gittleman, G.M. Mace, J.C. Marshall, A. Purvis. 2004. The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies. The Quarterly Review of Biology, June 2004, Vol. 79, No. 2 Basha, S.C. 1992. Mangroves of Kerala- A fast disappearing asset, Indian forester. 120:2 pp.175-189. Brown. 1998. The political ecology of biodiversity, conservation and development in Nepal’s Terai: Confused meanings, means and ends. Ecological Economics 24., pp73-87. Calumpong, H. C. and Menez, E. G., (1996), Field Guide to the Common Mangroves, Seagrasses and Algae of the Philippines. Bookmark Inc., Makati City, Philippines. Chen, L., W. Wang, and G. Lin. 2009. Recent progresses in mangrove conservation, restoration and research in China. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2:2, pp.45–54. Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001). Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition, PRIMER‐E: Plymouth. Cunha-Lignon, M., M. Kampel, J. Flandroy, R.P. Menghini, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2012. Urban mangrove dynamics under increasing anthropogenic pressure:analysis of remote sensing data and Brazilian legislation. In Dahdouh-Guebas, F. and B. Satyanarayana (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference: Meeting on Mangrove ecology, functioning and Management (MMM3). 2012, Galle, Sri Lanka Ekko C. van der Lerland. 2000. Ecological economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics, Specia; issue, 35 : pp 7-35 Field C.B., J.G. Osborn, L.L. Hoffman, J.F. Polsemberg, D.D. Ackerly, J.A. Berry, O. Bjorkman, A. Held, P.A. Matson, H.A. Monney. 1998. Mangrove Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters (8:7) pp3-14. George, A.L., and R.L. Mayden. 2005. Species Concepts and the Endangered Species Act: How a Valid Biological Definition of Species Enhances the Legal Protection of Biodiversity. Natural Resources Journal, Vol 45 Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. “Quantifying Biodiversity:Procedures and Pitfalls in the Measurement and Comparison of Species Richness”, Ecology Letters 4: 379‐391. Hossain, H., M. Hassan, I.A. Jahan, I. Nimmi, and A. Islam. 2012. Antidiarrhoeal Activity, Nitric Oxide Scavenging and Total Tannin Content
  • 10. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 from the Bark of Ceriops Decandra (Griff.) Ding Hou. IJPSR, Vol. 3, Issue 05 Jayatissa, L. P., F. Dahdouh-Guebas, and N. Koedam. 2002. A review of the floral composition and distribution of mangroves in Sri Lanka. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. Vol. 138, pp29–43. Joshi, P.C. 2007. Community structure and habitat selection of butterflies in Rajaji National Park, a moist deciduous forest in Uttaranchal, India: Tropical Ecology 48(1): 119-123. Manilal A, Sujith S, kiran GS, Selvin J, shakir C. 2009. Biopotential of mangroves collected from the Southwest Coast of India. Global J. Biotech. Biochem. 4: 59-65 Melana, D.M., J. Atchue III, C.E. Yao, R. Edwards, E.E. Melana and H.I Gonzalez. 2000. Mangrove Management Handbook.Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Manila, Philippines through the Coastal Resource Management Project, Cebu City, Philippines. 96p. Nagelkerkena, I.,S.J.M. Blaberb, S. Bouillonc, P. Greene, M. Haywoodf, L.G. Kirtong , J.O. Meyneckeh, J. Pawliki, H.M. Penrosej, A. Sasekumark, P.J. Somerfieldl. 2008. The habitat function Hernández-Cornejo, R., N. Koedam, A. Ruiz Luna, M. Troell, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2005. Remote sensing and ethnobotanical assessment of the mangrove forest chang Lindenmayer, D.B., C.R. Margules, and D.B. Botkin. 2000. Indicators for Bilogically Sustainable Forest anagement.Conservation Biology, 14(4) of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquatic Botany 89 (2008) 155–18 Offenberg, J. 2008. Mangrove Animal-Plant Interactions and their Application to Management.In:Scientific and Technical Symposium on Sustainable Mangrove Ecosystem Management. Department of Marine & Coastal Resources (DMCR) and Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, Thailand. Padial JM, Castroviejo-Fisher S, Köhler J, Vilá C, Chaparro JC, De la Riva I. 2009. Deciphering the products of evolution at the species level: the need for an integrative taxonomy. Zoologica Scripta, 38:431-447. Payton, I.J., M. Fenner, and W.G. Lee. 2002. Keystone species: the concept and its relevance for conservation management in New Zealand. Science for Conservation 203, 26p. Primavera, J.H., R.B. Sadaba, M.J.H.L. Lebata, J.P. Altamirano. 2004. Handbook of Mangroves in the Philippines – Panay. Polidoro BA, Carpenter KE, Collins L, Duke NC, Ellison AM, et al. (2010). The Loss of Species: Mangrove Extinction Risk and Geographic Areas of Global Concern. PLoS ONE 5(4) Ram, A.T. and C.S. Shaji. 2013. Diversity and Distribution of Mangroves in Kumbalam Island of Kerala, India. IOSR Journal Of Environmental Science, Toxicology And Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) 4:4 pp. 18- 26. Ramesh, T., K.J. Hussain, K.K. Satpathy, and M. Selvanayagam. 2013. Community composition and distribution of herpetofauna at Kalpakkam Nuclear campus, Southern India. Herpetology Notes, volume 6: 343-351 Shanker, K., Hiremath, A., Bawa, K. (2005): Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihoods in India. Plos Biology 3: 1878-1880 Snedaker. S. C. and Snedaker. J. G. (Eds) (1984). The Mangrove ecosystem: research methods. Unesco. Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, Umbrellas, And Keystones: Is Single-Species Management Passi In The Landscape Era? Biological Conservation 83:3, pp. 247-257. Tsujiyama, I., S. Mubassara, H. Aoshima. 2012. Anti-histamine release and anti- inflammatory activities of acqueous extracts of citrus fruits peels. Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine: 1-6 Turner, R. K., Jeroem C. J. M van der Bergh, Tore Soderques, Aat Barendregt, Jan vander Straaten, Edward Malthy, Walters, B.B. 2004. Local management of mangrove forests in the Philippines: successful conservation or
  • 11. Ordonio, AD, VM Martinez, RG Paglomutan Jr. and MEG Gimotea Pasil Mangrove Flora: Species and Conservation Links Volume 7, Number 1 June 2015 efficient resource exploitation? Hum. Ecol. 32, 177–193. Vyas, S.J., and A. J. Joshi. 2013. Study of Diversity Indices and Ecological Characteristic of Coastal Flora in ‘Bhal’ Region (Gujarat). International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences 3:1, pp 261-267. Zachariasa, M.A., and J.C. Roff. 2001. Use of Focal Species In Marine Conservation and Management: A Review and Critique of the Aquatic Conservation: Marine And Freshwater Ecosystems 11, pp59–76.