PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF COARSE AGGREGATE WITH WASTECERAMIC TILE IN CONCRETE. This Presentation is Describe the behavior of concrete after the use of Ceramic tiles in concrete as a replacement of coarse Aggregate.

1. G.H. RAISONI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
MANAGEMENT, AMRAVATI
AMRAVATI
Presented by :- Lokesh S. Shirbhate
RAISONI GROUP
A vision beyond
(DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING)

2.  Introduction
 Type of Material’s
 Properties of CeramicTiles
 Experimental Part
 Advantages & Disadvantages of Using CeramicTiles
in Concrete
 Conclusion
 References

3.  Today Ceramic has become synonymous with
flooring.
 In Ceramic Industry, About 30% Productions go as
Waste.
 The use of waste products in concrete not only
makes it economical but also solves some of the
disposal problems.
 However, the ceramic waste is durable, hard and
highly resistant to biological, chemical, and physical
degradation forces.
 This Presentation is Describe the behavior of
concrete after the use of Ceramic tiles in concrete as
a replacement of coarse Aggregate.

4.  Ceramic tile’s
 Destructed bitumen road
 Marble waste
 Coconut shell
 Destructed concrete road
 E-Plastic waste
 Glass
 Waste tyres crumb rubber

5. SR. NO. Property Conventional
Coarse
AggregateValue
Ceramic Coarse
AggregateValue
1. Specific Gravity 2.70 2.65
2. Fineness 6.50 7.00
3. Impact strength 17% 18.5%
4. Crushing strength 20.50 22.75

6.  Types of material used in concrete:- Cement,
fine aggregate, coarse aggregate,Ceramic
Scrap.
 Concrete are obtained from the Indian Standard
Mix Design method (IS:10262, 2009).
 Test on fresh concrete
 Strength of harden concrete determine by
making cubes and prisms.
 Test on hardened concrete
 Evaluation of Strength Properties

7.  Different Test Methods For Workability
Measurement
 1. SlumpTest
 2. Compaction FactorTest

8.  Cube of size 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm
were casted using M25 grade concrete.
 10cmx10cmx50cm prism with proper
compaction were casted using M25 grade
concrete.

9.  Compressive StrengthTest
 Most important properties of concrete and influences many
other describable properties of the hardened concrete.
 For getting compressive strength of concrete cube of size
150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm were casted using M25 grade
concrete.
 After the curing period of 7 days and 28 days, the cube
specimen is tested using calibrated compression testing
machine of 2000 KN capacity.

10.  Flexural StrengthTest
 10cmx10cmx50cm prism with proper compaction
were casted for getting flexural strength of
concrete.
 Then the specimen is placed in a UTM (universal
testing machine)
 The load is applied without shock and increasing
continuously at a rate of 400kg/min.

11.  Slum cone test
SR.NO Specimen
designation
Ceramic
Waste%
Slump (mm)
1. Conventional
concrete
0 24
2. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(15%Replacement)
15 18
3. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(30%Replacement)
30 18
4. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(45%Replacement)
45 16

12.  Compaction factor test
SR.NO Specimen
designation
Ceramic
Waste%
Weight of
compacted
factor
Weight of
uncompacted
factor
Compacting
factor
1. Conventional
concrete
0 14.52 12.13 .84
2. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(15%Replacement)
15 14.43 13.40 .93
3. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(30%Replacement)
30 14.28 13.33 .93
4. Ceramic Waste
Concrete
(45%Replacement)
45 14.40 13.40 .93

13.  Compressive Strength test
Sr. No Specimen designation Ceramic
Waste
%
Average
Compressive
Strength in
N/mm2
7 Days
Average
Compressive
Strength in
N/mm2
28Days
1 Conventional concrete 0 10.00 28.00
2 Ceramic Waste Concrete
(15% Replacement)
15 8.00 27.00
3 Ceramic Waste Concrete
(30% Replacement)
30 7.25 25.00
4 Ceramic Waste Concrete
(45% Replacement)
45 6.50 24.85

14. ✓ Advantages
 Reduce cost of concrete.
 About 30% productions which go waste is reused.
 Crushed Ceramic Aggregate Can Be Used To
Produce Lightweight Concrete, Without Affecting
Strength.

15. ✓ Disadvantages
▪ Specific Gravity For CeramicWaste Is 2.65Whereas For
Crushed Stone Is 2.70.
▪ 30% and 45% replacement of ceramic scrap has reduced
the ultimate load.

16.  It is observed that there is a strength increase
with addition of ceramic waste of 15% and
beyond which there appears to be no specific
enhancement in strength.
 Thus, it concluded that the replacement of
coarse aggregate with ceramic waste upto
15% replacement reaches optimum level.

17.  Investigation on behaviour of concrete in
structural applications.
 Applications of these concrete in road works
may be explored.

18.  [1].Aruna D, Rajendra Prabhu, SubhashCYaragal, KattaVenkataramana IJRET:eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN:
2321-7308.
 [2]. Batriti Monhun R. Marwein, M. Sneha, I. Bharathidasan International Journal of Scientific &
Engineering Research,Volume 7, Issue 4, April-2016 ISSN 2229-5518.
 [3]. N.Naveen Prasad, P.Hanitha, N.C.Anil IOSR Journal of Mechanical andCivil Engineering(IOSR-JMCE)
e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320- 334X,Volume 13, Issue 6Ver.V (Nov. - Dec.2016), PP 168-176.
 [4]. Paul O. Awoyera , Julius M. Ndambuki , Joseph O. Akinmusuru , David O. Omole-40482016 Housing
and Building National Research Center. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. 15 November 2016)
 [5]. P.Rajalakshmi, Dr.D.Suji, M. Perarasan, E.Niranjani International Journal of Civil and Structural
Engineering Research ISSN 2348- 7607 (Online)Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp: (114-125), Month: April 2016 -
September 2016.
 [6]. Prof. Shruthi. H. G, Prof. Gowtham Prasad. M. E SamreenTaj, Syed Ruman Pasha International
Research Journal of Engineering andTechnology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | July-
2016 p-ISSN: 2395-0072)
 [7]. M. Sekar Civil and Structural Engineering, SCSVMV University “Partial ReplacementOf Coarse
Aggregate ByWaste CeramicTile In Concrete”, International Journal for Research inApplied Science &
EngineeringTechnology (IJRASET)Volume 5 Issue III, March 2017