Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Anatomy
Anatomy
Arterial Supply
Venous Anatomy
Physiology – Exocrine Pancreas
• Secretion of water and electrolytes originates in the
centroacinar and intercalated duct cells
• Pancreatic enzymes originate in the acinar cells
• Final product is a colourless, odourless, and
isosmotic alkaline fluid that contains digestive
enzymes (amylase, lipase, and trypsinogen)
Physiology – Exocrine Pancreas
• Alkaline pH results from secreted bicarbonate
which serves to neutralize gastric acid and regulate
the pH of the intestine
• Enzymes digest carbohydrates, proteins, and fats
Enzymes
• Amylase
– only digestive enzyme secreted by the pancreas in an active form
– functions optimally at a pH of 7
– hydrolyzes starch and glycogen to glucose, maltose, maltotriose,
and dextrins
• Lipase
– function optimally at a pH of 7 to 9
– emulsify and hydrolyze fat in the presence of bile salts
Endocrine Function: Insulin
• Synthesized in the B cells of the islets of Langerhans
• 80% of the islet cell mass must be surgically removed
before diabetes becomes clinically apparent
• Proinsulin, is transported from the endoplasmic
reticulum to the Golgi complex where it is packaged into
granules and cleaved into insulin and a residual
connecting peptide, or C peptide
Insulin
• Major stimulants
– Glucose, amino acids, glucagon, GIP, CCK, sulfonylurea
compounds, β-Sympathetic fibers
• Major inhibitors
– somatostatin, amylin, pancreastatin, α-sympathetic
fibers
Glucagon
• Secreted by the A cells of the islet
• Glucagon elevates blood glucose levels through the
stimulation of glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis
• Major stimulants
– Aminoacids, Cholinergic fibers, β-Sympathetic fibers
• Major inhibitors
– Glucose, insulin, somatostatin, α-sympathetic fibers
Somatostatin
• Secreted by the D cells of the islet
• Inhibits the release of growth hormone
• Inhibits the release of almost all peptide hormones
• Inhibits gastric, pancreatic, and biliary secretion
• Used to treat both endocrine and exocrine disorders
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Head of Pancreas Tumour Tail of Pancreas Tumour
Pancreatic cancer
• Fourth leading cause of cancer-related death
• > 7000 deaths annually in UK
• Overall 5-year survival approx 1%
• Only approx 13% alive after 1 year
• Often called the “silent disease” because it usually
doesn’t cause symptoms in early stages
• M > F (2:1) and 2% of all tumours
• Association with smoking, hypertension, obesity
• Presents in 5th decade
• Risk factors:
– Tuberous sclerosis
– Von Hippel-Lindau disease (clear cell)
– Renal transplantation
– Dialysis
Some interesting facts
Aetiology
• Cause unknown
• Smoking & alcohol?
• Diabetes? (5 years greater than 2x increase)
• Hereditary pancreatic cancer – susceptibility locus has been found in relation to
chromosome 4q32-34
• Familial breast cancer gene (BRCA2)
• Chronic pancreatitis
Demographics
0
200
400
600
800
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+
Age at diagnosis
Numberofcases
0
25
50
75
100
Rateper100,000population
Male cases
Female cases
Male rates
Female rates
Figure 1.2: Numbers of new cases and age-specific incidence rates,
by sex, pancreatic cancer, UK 2003
Mortality
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
Year of diagnosis
Rateper100,000population
males incidence
females incidence
males mortality
females mortality
Figure 1.3: Age standardised (European) incidence and mortality
rates, pancreatic cancer, by sex, GB, 1975-2004
Mortality
0
10
20
30
40
50
one-year five-year one-year five-year
%survival
1971-1975
1976-1980
1981-1985
1986-1990
1991-1995
1996-1999
1998-2001*
* England only
Figure 3.1: One- and five-year relative survival by sex, adults
diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, England and Wales, 1971-
2001 and followed up to the end of 2003
Males Females
• Renal mass
• Haematuria
• Flank pain
– Complete triad = poor prognosis
• Remember pts often asymptomatic
– Malaise, weight loss, polycythaemia, hypertension can
also be seen.
Clinical presentation (triad)
Clinical presentation
• Weight loss
• Anorexia
• Nausea & vomiting
• Abdominal pain
• Obstructive jaundice (head lesions)
• Cachexia
• Very difficult to diagnose in early stage
Investigations
Radiological
• CT – identify renal lesion +
involvement of renal vein or IVC
• USS – tell if mass is cystic or
solid, and if TCC or RCC
• MRI & MRCP – good for staging
• ERCP
• Endoscopic USS
• Intravenous urogram (IVU)
• CT-PET
Bloods
• ESR usually raised
• LFTs may be abnormal
• FBC
• U&E’s
• Tumour marker: CA 19-9
 Laparoscopy
CT
MRCP
ERCP
+ Accuracy of 60%-80 % by imaging alone.
- 5%-10% complication rate.
Tissue/Brushings
+ Diagnostic yield in the range of 40% to 50%.
- Up to 11% and 21% complication rate
Double duct
sign
Distal CBD stricture
Staging Laparoscopy
1. John et al. Annals of Surg 1995; 221: 156-164
Peritoneal Seedlings
ASCITES
EUS
EUS small tumours
pancreas
Staging and biopsy
CBD: common bile duct; PV: portal vein; HOP: Head of pancreas
Biopsy Needle
Treatment
• Resection possible in only approx 20%
– local invasion
– Metastases
– advanced cachexia
• Resection – Whipple procedure
• Unresectable – biliary bypass + gastric bypass
Allen Oldfather Whipple
(1881-1963)
Original paper. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of
Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935; 102: 763-769.
Whipple's Procedure
Whipple pancreaticoduodenectom
Pancreatic Anastomosis
Jejunum
Cut end of pancreatic neck
Biliary Anastomosis
Gastric Anastomosis
Staging: TMN
T categories
• TX: The main tumour cannot be assessed.
• T0: No evidence of a primary tumour.
• Tis: Carcinoma in situ (very few tumours are
found at this stage)
• T1: The cancer has not spread beyond the
pancreas and is smaller than 2 cm (about ¾ inch)
across.
• T2: The cancer has not spread beyond the
pancreas but is larger than 2 cm across.
• T3: The cancer has spread from the pancreas to
surrounding tissues near the pancreas but not to
major blood vessels or nerves.
• T4: The cancer has extended further beyond the
pancreas into nearby large blood vessels or
nerves.
N categories
• NX: Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed.
• N0: Regional lymph nodes (lymph nodes near
the pancreas) are not involved.
• N1: Cancer has spread to regional lymph nodes.
M categories
• MX: Spread to distant organs cannot be
assessed.
• M0: The cancer has not spread to distant lymph
nodes (other than those near the pancreas) or to
distant organs such as the liver, lungs, brain, etc.
• M1: Distant metastasis is present.
T Stage
Lymph nodes
Metastases
Stage Grouping
Stage 0 (Tis, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the top layers of pancreatic duct cells and has not invaded deeper
tissues. It has not spread outside of the pancreas. These tumours are sometimes referred to as pancreatic
carcinoma in situ or pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia III (PanIn III).
Stage IA (T1, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the pancreas and is less than 2 cm in size. It has not spread to
nearby lymph nodes or distant sites.
Stage IB (T2, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the pancreas and is larger than 2 cm in size. It has not spread to
nearby lymph nodes or distant sites.
Stage IIA (T3, N0, M0): The tumour is growing outside the pancreas but not into large blood vessels. It has not
spread to nearby lymph nodes or distant sites.
Stage IIB (T1-3, N1, M0): The tumour is either confined to the pancreas or growing outside the pancreas but not
into nearby large blood vessels or major nerves. It has spread to nearby lymph nodes but not distant sites.
Stage III (T4, Any N, M0): The tumour is growing outside the pancreas into nearby large blood vessels or major
nerves. It may or may not have spread to nearby lymph nodes. It has not spread to distant sites.
Stage IV (Any T, Any N, M1): The cancer has spread to distant sites.
5 Year Survival
Stage
IA: 37%
Stage
IB 21%
Stage
IIA 12% Stage
IIB
6% Stage
III
2%
Stage
IV
1%
Increasing stage = worse 5 year survival
Complications
• Up to 30%
• Include: pancreatic fistula
– intraabdominal sepsis
– delayed gastric emptying
• Mortality < 5%
Diener et al. Ann of Surg; 2007;245(2);187-200
Mortality
• Resection is only option for cure
• Mortality in high volume centres less than 5%
• Clear evidence that high volume centres have better outcome
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–257.
Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, et al. Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg. 2001;18:453–457.
Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232:786–795.
Yuman Fong, MD, Mithat Gonen, PhD, David Rubin, MS, Mark Radzyner, MBA, JD, and Murray F. Brennan, MD. Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers Ann Surg.
2005 October; 242(4): 540–547.
Cystic Lesions of Pancreas
Cystic lesions
• Pseudocyst
• Serous cystadenoma
• Mucinous cystadenoma
• IPMT
• Pseudopapillary cystic tumours
Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Mucinous tumours
• All mucinous pancreatic neoplasms are (believed) to
malignant or pre-malignant
• Frankly malignant (invasive + CIS) among resected:
– Main duct IPMN ≈25-80%
– Branch duct IPMN ≈0-30% (series at high end do not have
assx pts)
– MCN ≈5-20%
Tanaka et al. Pancreatology 2006
Maybe observe?
• So which CPN are we talking about?
Growing problem
• CT increasing by 9% per yr
• CT abd/pelvis ≈ 30% of all CTs
• ≈1% of abdominal CTs show
pancreatic cystic lesion
• up to 70% of CPN referred to
3O centre asymptomatic
Brenner, NEJM 2007
An epidemic of incidental
asymptomatic pancreatic cysts.
Diagnostic evaluation
• Cross sectional imaging (CT/MRI)
– Modest diagnostic accuracy
• EUS
– Morphologic characterization poor
– FNA for cytology and CEA
• PET
– Does not appear to discriminate
Visser, AJR 2007
Brugge, Gastro 2004
Sperti, J GI Surg 2005
But why not intervene to prevent cancer?
• Risk of malignancy in small, asymptomatic
pancreatic cysts approximates mortality from
operative intervention
• i.e. Whipple in expert centres:
– 1-3% mortality
– 40-50% morbidity
Intl Consensus Conference
Sedai, Japan 2004
1. Main duct IPMN - resect
2. MCN - generally resect (younger women, usually
left sided resection with < morbidity)
3. Branch duct IPMN
– Resect if symptomatic, > 3cm, mural nodules, +
cytology, jaundice, ductal dilatation
– Observe if ≤3 cm, no sx, nor worrisome features
Tanaka et al. Pancreatology 2006
Pancreatic Endocrine Tumours
• Insulinoma (B cells)
• Glucagonoma (A cells)
• VIP
• Rare tumours which may give rise to overproduction of
peptide products
Malignant Tumours
• Spleen - mostly secondary involvement
• Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma - most common malignancy
• Spleen is the primary site
– 10% Hodgkin’s disease
– 30% of resected spleens (staging procedure) have (+) histology
• Hairy cell leukaemia
– Resect for symptomatic splenomegaly
• CML & CLL
– symptomatic splenomegaly (hypersplenism) = splenectomy
Benign Tumours
• Haemangioma
– Risk of rupture + platelet sequestration
– No treatment unless symptomatic
• Hamartoma
• Lymphangioma
• Often haemorrhage associated
• Sheets of clear cells
• Vacuolated cytoplasm
• Pyknotic nuclei (nucleus shrinks & chromatin
condenses)
• Cystic in 15%
Clear Cell Carcinoma
• Partial nephrectomy (tumours < 4cm)
• Radical nephrectomy (remove kidneys, ureter,
adrenal glad, & hilar lymph nodes)
• Chemotherapy (good for mets)
• Interferon (poorly tolerated, good for mets)
• Radioablation can be used in < 3cm
Treatment
Papillary Carcinoma
• 10% of renal tumours
• 10% cases multifocal/bilateral
• Histo: papillary pattern, cells enclosing “foamy
macrophage” clusters
Chromophobe Carcinoma
• 5% of tumours
• Thick cell membrane
• Perinuclear halo
• Decent prognosis
Renal Pelvis Carcinoma
• Vast majority transitional cell carcinomas
Other Tumours
Collecting Duct
Carcinoma
• Exophytic tumour
• Poor prognosis,
aggressive
• Gland forming
Wilm’s tumour
(nephroblastoma)
• Paediatric tumour
• Large abdomen, mass,
N&V, haematuria, HTN
• Classic triphasic pattern
Fuhrman Grading
• Grading is based on nuclear size
• Graded between I-IV, with IV having worst
prognosis
• I – Small Nuclei IV – Big Nuclei

Pancreatic Cancer

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Physiology – ExocrinePancreas • Secretion of water and electrolytes originates in the centroacinar and intercalated duct cells • Pancreatic enzymes originate in the acinar cells • Final product is a colourless, odourless, and isosmotic alkaline fluid that contains digestive enzymes (amylase, lipase, and trypsinogen)
  • 7.
    Physiology – ExocrinePancreas • Alkaline pH results from secreted bicarbonate which serves to neutralize gastric acid and regulate the pH of the intestine • Enzymes digest carbohydrates, proteins, and fats
  • 8.
    Enzymes • Amylase – onlydigestive enzyme secreted by the pancreas in an active form – functions optimally at a pH of 7 – hydrolyzes starch and glycogen to glucose, maltose, maltotriose, and dextrins • Lipase – function optimally at a pH of 7 to 9 – emulsify and hydrolyze fat in the presence of bile salts
  • 9.
    Endocrine Function: Insulin •Synthesized in the B cells of the islets of Langerhans • 80% of the islet cell mass must be surgically removed before diabetes becomes clinically apparent • Proinsulin, is transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi complex where it is packaged into granules and cleaved into insulin and a residual connecting peptide, or C peptide
  • 10.
    Insulin • Major stimulants –Glucose, amino acids, glucagon, GIP, CCK, sulfonylurea compounds, β-Sympathetic fibers • Major inhibitors – somatostatin, amylin, pancreastatin, α-sympathetic fibers
  • 11.
    Glucagon • Secreted bythe A cells of the islet • Glucagon elevates blood glucose levels through the stimulation of glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis • Major stimulants – Aminoacids, Cholinergic fibers, β-Sympathetic fibers • Major inhibitors – Glucose, insulin, somatostatin, α-sympathetic fibers
  • 12.
    Somatostatin • Secreted bythe D cells of the islet • Inhibits the release of growth hormone • Inhibits the release of almost all peptide hormones • Inhibits gastric, pancreatic, and biliary secretion • Used to treat both endocrine and exocrine disorders
  • 13.
    Pancreatic adenocarcinoma Head ofPancreas Tumour Tail of Pancreas Tumour
  • 14.
    Pancreatic cancer • Fourthleading cause of cancer-related death • > 7000 deaths annually in UK • Overall 5-year survival approx 1% • Only approx 13% alive after 1 year • Often called the “silent disease” because it usually doesn’t cause symptoms in early stages
  • 15.
    • M >F (2:1) and 2% of all tumours • Association with smoking, hypertension, obesity • Presents in 5th decade • Risk factors: – Tuberous sclerosis – Von Hippel-Lindau disease (clear cell) – Renal transplantation – Dialysis Some interesting facts
  • 16.
    Aetiology • Cause unknown •Smoking & alcohol? • Diabetes? (5 years greater than 2x increase) • Hereditary pancreatic cancer – susceptibility locus has been found in relation to chromosome 4q32-34 • Familial breast cancer gene (BRCA2) • Chronic pancreatitis
  • 17.
    Demographics 0 200 400 600 800 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ Age at diagnosis Numberofcases 0 25 50 75 100 Rateper100,000population Malecases Female cases Male rates Female rates Figure 1.2: Numbers of new cases and age-specific incidence rates, by sex, pancreatic cancer, UK 2003
  • 18.
    Mortality 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 Year of diagnosis Rateper100,000population malesincidence females incidence males mortality females mortality Figure 1.3: Age standardised (European) incidence and mortality rates, pancreatic cancer, by sex, GB, 1975-2004
  • 19.
    Mortality 0 10 20 30 40 50 one-year five-year one-yearfive-year %survival 1971-1975 1976-1980 1981-1985 1986-1990 1991-1995 1996-1999 1998-2001* * England only Figure 3.1: One- and five-year relative survival by sex, adults diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, England and Wales, 1971- 2001 and followed up to the end of 2003 Males Females
  • 20.
    • Renal mass •Haematuria • Flank pain – Complete triad = poor prognosis • Remember pts often asymptomatic – Malaise, weight loss, polycythaemia, hypertension can also be seen. Clinical presentation (triad)
  • 21.
    Clinical presentation • Weightloss • Anorexia • Nausea & vomiting • Abdominal pain • Obstructive jaundice (head lesions) • Cachexia • Very difficult to diagnose in early stage
  • 22.
    Investigations Radiological • CT –identify renal lesion + involvement of renal vein or IVC • USS – tell if mass is cystic or solid, and if TCC or RCC • MRI & MRCP – good for staging • ERCP • Endoscopic USS • Intravenous urogram (IVU) • CT-PET Bloods • ESR usually raised • LFTs may be abnormal • FBC • U&E’s • Tumour marker: CA 19-9  Laparoscopy
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    ERCP + Accuracy of60%-80 % by imaging alone. - 5%-10% complication rate. Tissue/Brushings + Diagnostic yield in the range of 40% to 50%. - Up to 11% and 21% complication rate Double duct sign Distal CBD stricture
  • 26.
    Staging Laparoscopy 1. Johnet al. Annals of Surg 1995; 221: 156-164 Peritoneal Seedlings ASCITES
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Staging and biopsy CBD:common bile duct; PV: portal vein; HOP: Head of pancreas Biopsy Needle
  • 30.
    Treatment • Resection possiblein only approx 20% – local invasion – Metastases – advanced cachexia • Resection – Whipple procedure • Unresectable – biliary bypass + gastric bypass
  • 31.
    Allen Oldfather Whipple (1881-1963) Originalpaper. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935; 102: 763-769.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Staging: TMN T categories •TX: The main tumour cannot be assessed. • T0: No evidence of a primary tumour. • Tis: Carcinoma in situ (very few tumours are found at this stage) • T1: The cancer has not spread beyond the pancreas and is smaller than 2 cm (about ¾ inch) across. • T2: The cancer has not spread beyond the pancreas but is larger than 2 cm across. • T3: The cancer has spread from the pancreas to surrounding tissues near the pancreas but not to major blood vessels or nerves. • T4: The cancer has extended further beyond the pancreas into nearby large blood vessels or nerves. N categories • NX: Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed. • N0: Regional lymph nodes (lymph nodes near the pancreas) are not involved. • N1: Cancer has spread to regional lymph nodes. M categories • MX: Spread to distant organs cannot be assessed. • M0: The cancer has not spread to distant lymph nodes (other than those near the pancreas) or to distant organs such as the liver, lungs, brain, etc. • M1: Distant metastasis is present.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Stage Grouping Stage 0(Tis, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the top layers of pancreatic duct cells and has not invaded deeper tissues. It has not spread outside of the pancreas. These tumours are sometimes referred to as pancreatic carcinoma in situ or pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia III (PanIn III). Stage IA (T1, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the pancreas and is less than 2 cm in size. It has not spread to nearby lymph nodes or distant sites. Stage IB (T2, N0, M0): The tumour is confined to the pancreas and is larger than 2 cm in size. It has not spread to nearby lymph nodes or distant sites. Stage IIA (T3, N0, M0): The tumour is growing outside the pancreas but not into large blood vessels. It has not spread to nearby lymph nodes or distant sites. Stage IIB (T1-3, N1, M0): The tumour is either confined to the pancreas or growing outside the pancreas but not into nearby large blood vessels or major nerves. It has spread to nearby lymph nodes but not distant sites. Stage III (T4, Any N, M0): The tumour is growing outside the pancreas into nearby large blood vessels or major nerves. It may or may not have spread to nearby lymph nodes. It has not spread to distant sites. Stage IV (Any T, Any N, M1): The cancer has spread to distant sites.
  • 42.
    5 Year Survival Stage IA:37% Stage IB 21% Stage IIA 12% Stage IIB 6% Stage III 2% Stage IV 1% Increasing stage = worse 5 year survival
  • 43.
    Complications • Up to30% • Include: pancreatic fistula – intraabdominal sepsis – delayed gastric emptying • Mortality < 5% Diener et al. Ann of Surg; 2007;245(2);187-200
  • 44.
    Mortality • Resection isonly option for cure • Mortality in high volume centres less than 5% • Clear evidence that high volume centres have better outcome Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–257. Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, et al. Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg. 2001;18:453–457. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000;232:786–795. Yuman Fong, MD, Mithat Gonen, PhD, David Rubin, MS, Mark Radzyner, MBA, JD, and Murray F. Brennan, MD. Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers Ann Surg. 2005 October; 242(4): 540–547.
  • 45.
  • 46.
    Cystic lesions • Pseudocyst •Serous cystadenoma • Mucinous cystadenoma • IPMT • Pseudopapillary cystic tumours
  • 47.
  • 48.
    Mucinous tumours • Allmucinous pancreatic neoplasms are (believed) to malignant or pre-malignant • Frankly malignant (invasive + CIS) among resected: – Main duct IPMN ≈25-80% – Branch duct IPMN ≈0-30% (series at high end do not have assx pts) – MCN ≈5-20% Tanaka et al. Pancreatology 2006
  • 49.
    Maybe observe? • Sowhich CPN are we talking about?
  • 50.
    Growing problem • CTincreasing by 9% per yr • CT abd/pelvis ≈ 30% of all CTs • ≈1% of abdominal CTs show pancreatic cystic lesion • up to 70% of CPN referred to 3O centre asymptomatic Brenner, NEJM 2007 An epidemic of incidental asymptomatic pancreatic cysts.
  • 51.
    Diagnostic evaluation • Crosssectional imaging (CT/MRI) – Modest diagnostic accuracy • EUS – Morphologic characterization poor – FNA for cytology and CEA • PET – Does not appear to discriminate Visser, AJR 2007 Brugge, Gastro 2004 Sperti, J GI Surg 2005
  • 52.
    But why notintervene to prevent cancer? • Risk of malignancy in small, asymptomatic pancreatic cysts approximates mortality from operative intervention • i.e. Whipple in expert centres: – 1-3% mortality – 40-50% morbidity
  • 53.
    Intl Consensus Conference Sedai,Japan 2004 1. Main duct IPMN - resect 2. MCN - generally resect (younger women, usually left sided resection with < morbidity) 3. Branch duct IPMN – Resect if symptomatic, > 3cm, mural nodules, + cytology, jaundice, ductal dilatation – Observe if ≤3 cm, no sx, nor worrisome features Tanaka et al. Pancreatology 2006
  • 54.
    Pancreatic Endocrine Tumours •Insulinoma (B cells) • Glucagonoma (A cells) • VIP • Rare tumours which may give rise to overproduction of peptide products
  • 55.
    Malignant Tumours • Spleen- mostly secondary involvement • Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma - most common malignancy • Spleen is the primary site – 10% Hodgkin’s disease – 30% of resected spleens (staging procedure) have (+) histology • Hairy cell leukaemia – Resect for symptomatic splenomegaly • CML & CLL – symptomatic splenomegaly (hypersplenism) = splenectomy
  • 56.
    Benign Tumours • Haemangioma –Risk of rupture + platelet sequestration – No treatment unless symptomatic • Hamartoma • Lymphangioma
  • 57.
    • Often haemorrhageassociated • Sheets of clear cells • Vacuolated cytoplasm • Pyknotic nuclei (nucleus shrinks & chromatin condenses) • Cystic in 15% Clear Cell Carcinoma
  • 58.
    • Partial nephrectomy(tumours < 4cm) • Radical nephrectomy (remove kidneys, ureter, adrenal glad, & hilar lymph nodes) • Chemotherapy (good for mets) • Interferon (poorly tolerated, good for mets) • Radioablation can be used in < 3cm Treatment
  • 59.
    Papillary Carcinoma • 10%of renal tumours • 10% cases multifocal/bilateral • Histo: papillary pattern, cells enclosing “foamy macrophage” clusters
  • 60.
    Chromophobe Carcinoma • 5%of tumours • Thick cell membrane • Perinuclear halo • Decent prognosis
  • 61.
    Renal Pelvis Carcinoma •Vast majority transitional cell carcinomas
  • 62.
    Other Tumours Collecting Duct Carcinoma •Exophytic tumour • Poor prognosis, aggressive • Gland forming Wilm’s tumour (nephroblastoma) • Paediatric tumour • Large abdomen, mass, N&V, haematuria, HTN • Classic triphasic pattern
  • 63.
    Fuhrman Grading • Gradingis based on nuclear size • Graded between I-IV, with IV having worst prognosis • I – Small Nuclei IV – Big Nuclei