This document provides quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including glass containers, closures, metallic tins, strips, blisters, paper and board. It describes tests for chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, thermal shock resistance, and arsenic content for glass containers. For closures, tests are provided for sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability, pH and reducing substances of aqueous extracts. It also outlines dimensional checks, leakage testing and lacquer curing tests for collapsible tubes and checks for cleanliness and dimensions for metallic tins. Vacuum desiccator testing is described to check for leakage in strips and blister packages. Finally, it lists references for further information on packaging testing.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials. It provides details on tests for glass containers, including chemical resistance via powdered glass and water attack tests. It also describes tests for closures, such as sterility and fragmentation testing. Further tests are outlined for packaging materials like collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, paper and board. The document references additional sources for information on pharmaceutical packaging and quality control testing.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials. It provides details of tests for glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, paper and board. Tests described include chemical resistance of glass, hydrolytic resistance, arsenic test, thermal shock test, leakage test, sterility test, fragmentation test, self-sealability, pH and reducing substances tests for closures. Tests are also provided for leakage, flexibility and lacquer compatibility of collapsible tubes and dimensional checks for metallic tins. The document lists references for further information.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, and paper/board. It describes tests to evaluate the chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, arsenic content, thermal shock resistance, internal bursting pressure, and leakage of glass containers. Similar tests are described for evaluating the sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability, pH, light absorption, and residue of closures. Tests for collapsible tubes include leakage testing, collapsibility testing, and lacquer curing/compatibility. Dimensional measurements and cleanliness checks are discussed for metallic tins. Vacuum testing is described for quality control of strips and
The document discusses various quality control tests performed on pharmaceutical packaging materials like glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, and paper and board. It describes tests such as chemical resistance testing, hydrolytic resistance testing, arsenic testing, thermal shock testing, internal bursting pressure testing, and leakage testing for glass containers. Similar tests are described for other packaging materials to check properties like sterility, fragmentation resistance, self-sealability, dimensions, cleanliness, and moisture penetration resistance. The purpose of these tests is to ensure that the packaging materials meet quality standards and do not interact or leach components that can contaminate the pharmaceutical products stored within.
This document discusses pharmaceutical packaging materials and quality control testing. It defines primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging. Common packaging materials include glass, plastic, paper, and boards. Quality control tests for glass containers include chemical resistance via powdered glass and water attack tests. Tests are also described for plastic containers, including clarity of extract and non-volatile residue. The document concludes that testing packaging materials is important to ensure the quality, stability, and efficacy of drug products.
This document discusses quality control tests for containers, closures, and packaging materials. It outlines various tests for glass and plastic containers like powdered glass test, water attack test, and water vapor permeability test. Tests are described for checking properties like resistance to heat and pressure. Quality control tests for closures ensure sterility, lack of fragmentation, and proper sealing. These tests are important to ensure the packaging protects the drug product during storage, transport, and use.
Quality control test for containers and closuresHenisha Patel
This document discusses quality control tests for containers, closures, and packaging materials. It outlines various tests for glass and plastic containers like powdered glass test, water attack test, and water vapor permeability test. Tests are also described for closures, including fragmentation test, sterility test, and tests for properties like pH and reducing substances of aqueous extracts of closures. Various types of primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging are also mentioned, along with quality control tests for blister packs and strips to check for proper sealing and prevention of moisture ingress.
This document discusses quality control testing for packaging materials, specifically glass and plastic containers. It defines quality control and the different types of packaging (primary, secondary, tertiary). It then describes various quality control tests performed on glass containers, including tests for chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, thermal shock resistance, and tests for containers used for injectable preparations. Similar tests are described for plastic containers, with the overall goal of ensuring packaging materials meet specifications before use to protect drug quality, stability, and efficacy.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials. It provides details on tests for glass containers, including chemical resistance via powdered glass and water attack tests. It also describes tests for closures, such as sterility and fragmentation testing. Further tests are outlined for packaging materials like collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, paper and board. The document references additional sources for information on pharmaceutical packaging and quality control testing.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials. It provides details of tests for glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, paper and board. Tests described include chemical resistance of glass, hydrolytic resistance, arsenic test, thermal shock test, leakage test, sterility test, fragmentation test, self-sealability, pH and reducing substances tests for closures. Tests are also provided for leakage, flexibility and lacquer compatibility of collapsible tubes and dimensional checks for metallic tins. The document lists references for further information.
This document discusses quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, and paper/board. It describes tests to evaluate the chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, arsenic content, thermal shock resistance, internal bursting pressure, and leakage of glass containers. Similar tests are described for evaluating the sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability, pH, light absorption, and residue of closures. Tests for collapsible tubes include leakage testing, collapsibility testing, and lacquer curing/compatibility. Dimensional measurements and cleanliness checks are discussed for metallic tins. Vacuum testing is described for quality control of strips and
The document discusses various quality control tests performed on pharmaceutical packaging materials like glass containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, strips, blisters, and paper and board. It describes tests such as chemical resistance testing, hydrolytic resistance testing, arsenic testing, thermal shock testing, internal bursting pressure testing, and leakage testing for glass containers. Similar tests are described for other packaging materials to check properties like sterility, fragmentation resistance, self-sealability, dimensions, cleanliness, and moisture penetration resistance. The purpose of these tests is to ensure that the packaging materials meet quality standards and do not interact or leach components that can contaminate the pharmaceutical products stored within.
This document discusses pharmaceutical packaging materials and quality control testing. It defines primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging. Common packaging materials include glass, plastic, paper, and boards. Quality control tests for glass containers include chemical resistance via powdered glass and water attack tests. Tests are also described for plastic containers, including clarity of extract and non-volatile residue. The document concludes that testing packaging materials is important to ensure the quality, stability, and efficacy of drug products.
This document discusses quality control tests for containers, closures, and packaging materials. It outlines various tests for glass and plastic containers like powdered glass test, water attack test, and water vapor permeability test. Tests are described for checking properties like resistance to heat and pressure. Quality control tests for closures ensure sterility, lack of fragmentation, and proper sealing. These tests are important to ensure the packaging protects the drug product during storage, transport, and use.
Quality control test for containers and closuresHenisha Patel
This document discusses quality control tests for containers, closures, and packaging materials. It outlines various tests for glass and plastic containers like powdered glass test, water attack test, and water vapor permeability test. Tests are also described for closures, including fragmentation test, sterility test, and tests for properties like pH and reducing substances of aqueous extracts of closures. Various types of primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging are also mentioned, along with quality control tests for blister packs and strips to check for proper sealing and prevention of moisture ingress.
This document discusses quality control testing for packaging materials, specifically glass and plastic containers. It defines quality control and the different types of packaging (primary, secondary, tertiary). It then describes various quality control tests performed on glass containers, including tests for chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, thermal shock resistance, and tests for containers used for injectable preparations. Similar tests are described for plastic containers, with the overall goal of ensuring packaging materials meet specifications before use to protect drug quality, stability, and efficacy.
This document discusses quality control tests for packaging materials used in the pharmaceutical industry. It begins with definitions of packaging, quality control, and the different categories of packaging materials. It then describes common materials used for primary packaging like containers and closures, and secondary packaging. The rest of the document outlines specific quality control tests performed on these materials, including chemical resistance testing, hydrolytic resistance testing, and tests for containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials.
This document discusses pharmaceutical packaging materials and quality control testing. It defines primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging. Common materials used include glass, plastic, rubber, and paper. Quality control tests are described for glass including powdered glass and water attack tests. Plastic container tests include leakage, collapsibility, water vapor permeability, and transparency. Rubber closure tests include fragmentation, self-sealability, extractive, and compatibility testing. Proper packaging protects pharmaceutical products and quality testing ensures the materials are suitable for drug products.
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materialsPranali Polshettiwar
This document summarizes quality control tests for containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials. It describes common materials used for each, such as glass, plastic, metal for containers and rubber, plastic, metal for closures. Key quality tests for containers include powdered glass test, water attack test, hydrolytic resistance test, and thermal shock test. Tests for closures include residue on evaporation, pH of extract, and sterility. Secondary packaging materials like paper and cardboard are also tested for quality.
plastic and glass containers and its evaluation test, drug plastic considera...SUJIT DAS
This document discusses quality control tests that must be conducted on plastic containers used for pharmaceutical products. It outlines specific tests for non-parenteral and parenteral preparations, including leakage tests, clarity of extracts, and limits for substances like barium, heavy metals, and tin. It also discusses considerations for using plastic versus glass containers, noting potential issues like permeation of gases/liquids, leaching of substances from the plastic, and chemical reactions between drugs and container materials.
This document outlines various quality control tests performed on pharmaceutical packaging and containers. It discusses QC tests for containers made of glass, plastic, and metal to test for chemical resistance, leakage, pressure resistance, and other properties. It also summarizes QC tests for closures like sterility testing, fragmentation testing, and pH testing of aqueous extracts. Finally, common QC tests for secondary packaging materials like paper and board are mentioned, including moisture content, strength, and barrier property testing. The document provides detailed methods and acceptance criteria for many important packaging quality control tests.
Quality control test of glass containersdipsborse875
This document outlines several quality control tests performed on glass containers, including chemical resistance testing via powdered glass and water attack tests, hydrolytic resistance testing, arsenic testing for containers used for aqueous parenterals, and thermal shock testing. The tests involve procedures like grinding samples to powder, titrating solutions, and measuring absorbance to ensure glass containers can adequately resist chemicals, pressure, heat, and leaching of contaminants.
This document outlines quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including containers, closures, and secondary packaging. It describes tests for glass, plastic, metal and rubber containers to test properties like chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, sterility and leakage. Tests are also described for closures to evaluate sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability and extractable substances. Finally, common tests for secondary packaging materials like paper and board are mentioned including moisture content, folding endurance and burst resistance.
This document discusses quality control testing of pharmaceutical packaging materials. It begins by defining packaging and explaining that quality control of packaging starts at the design stage to identify and minimize potential quality problems. It then covers common quality control tests for different packaging components like containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials. These include tests to check properties like chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, leakage, dimensional specifications and more. The document provides details on test methods and acceptance criteria for ensuring packaging components meet quality standards.
Quality control test for packaging material ,qc test for glass,metal,rubberKunalPatel257
This document describes quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including containers, closures, and secondary packaging. It provides details on tests for glass, plastic, and metal containers to evaluate properties like chemical resistance, leakage, hydrolytic resistance, and thermal shock resistance. Tests for closures examine sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability, pH, and absorption. Secondary packaging materials are tested for moisture content, folding endurance, air permeability, tensile strength, and burst resistance. The document provides testing methodologies and acceptance limits for ensuring packaging integrity and suitability for drug products.
Selection and Evaluation of Pharmaceutical packaging materials and.pptxAbhishekVinod8
The document discusses various packaging materials used in the pharmaceutical industry including glass, plastic, and metal containers as well as different types of closures. It provides details on the properties, types, evaluation, and testing of these packaging materials to ensure they are suitable for holding pharmaceutical products and meeting regulatory standards. Selection of the appropriate packaging material is based on factors like the route of administration, physical form of the product, stability requirements, and cost considerations.
University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences is a flag bearer of excellence in Pharmaceutical education and research in the country. Here is another initiative to make study material available to everyone worldwide. Based on the new PCI guidelines and syllabus here we have a presentation dealing with "Quality control of packaging materials."
Thank you for reading.
we hope it was helpful to you.
UIPS,PU team
This document discusses quality control testing standards and procedures for pharmaceutical packaging materials. It outlines tests for various packaging components like glass containers, plastic packaging, and rubber stoppers. Key tests described include appearance and dimensional checks, compatibility testing, chemical resistance tests like powdered glass tests and water attack tests, sterility validation tests for sterile products, and non-sterile product validation tests. The document emphasizes that quality control testing is important to ensure packaging and components are defect-free and can safely contain drug products.
This document summarizes quality control testing procedures for various packing materials, including glass containers, plastic containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, and strip and blister packages. Key tests described are powdered glass testing and water attack testing for glass containers, leakage and water vapor permeability testing for plastic containers, sterility and pH testing for closures, leakage and lacquer compatibility testing for collapsible tubes, dimensional measurements and cleanliness checks for metallic tins, and moisture ingress testing for strip and blister packages. The tests are designed to evaluate properties like integrity, permeability, compatibility, and cleanliness to ensure the packing materials meet quality standards.
Quality control of packaging material.pptxEasy Concept
The selection of package begins with determination of products physical & chemical characteristics.
Quality control of a packaging component starts at design stage. All the aspects of a pack development may give rise to quality problems. It must be identified & minimized by performing quality control tests.
This document discusses various tests used to evaluate pharmaceutical ointments and determine their quality. It describes physical tests like examining appearance, measuring particle size, checking weight variation and testing absorption, penetration and drug release rates. It also covers microbiological tests to check microbial content and preservative efficacy. Specific methods are provided for particle size determination, weight variation testing, and evaluating absorption rate. The document emphasizes that these tests are important to characterize individual drug and excipient properties and how moisture can impact them.
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...IJECEIAES
This paper describes a speed control device for generating electrical energy on an electricity network based on the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) used for wind power conversion systems. At first, a double-fed induction generator model was constructed. A control law is formulated to govern the flow of energy between the stator of a DFIG and the energy network using three types of controllers: proportional integral (PI), sliding mode controller (SMC) and second order sliding mode controller (SOSMC). Their different results in terms of power reference tracking, reaction to unexpected speed fluctuations, sensitivity to perturbations, and resilience against machine parameter alterations are compared. MATLAB/Simulink was used to conduct the simulations for the preceding study. Multiple simulations have shown very satisfying results, and the investigations demonstrate the efficacy and power-enhancing capabilities of the suggested control system.
Comparative analysis between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquapon...bijceesjournal
The aquaponic system of planting is a method that does not require soil usage. It is a method that only needs water, fish, lava rocks (a substitute for soil), and plants. Aquaponic systems are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Its use not only helps to plant in small spaces but also helps reduce artificial chemical use and minimizes excess water use, as aquaponics consumes 90% less water than soil-based gardening. The study applied a descriptive and experimental design to assess and compare conventional and reconstructed aquaponic methods for reproducing tomatoes. The researchers created an observation checklist to determine the significant factors of the study. The study aims to determine the significant difference between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquaponics systems propagating tomatoes in terms of height, weight, girth, and number of fruits. The reconstructed aquaponics system’s higher growth yield results in a much more nourished crop than the traditional aquaponics system. It is superior in its number of fruits, height, weight, and girth measurement. Moreover, the reconstructed aquaponics system is proven to eliminate all the hindrances present in the traditional aquaponics system, which are overcrowding of fish, algae growth, pest problems, contaminated water, and dead fish.
This document discusses quality control tests for packaging materials used in the pharmaceutical industry. It begins with definitions of packaging, quality control, and the different categories of packaging materials. It then describes common materials used for primary packaging like containers and closures, and secondary packaging. The rest of the document outlines specific quality control tests performed on these materials, including chemical resistance testing, hydrolytic resistance testing, and tests for containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials.
This document discusses pharmaceutical packaging materials and quality control testing. It defines primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging. Common materials used include glass, plastic, rubber, and paper. Quality control tests are described for glass including powdered glass and water attack tests. Plastic container tests include leakage, collapsibility, water vapor permeability, and transparency. Rubber closure tests include fragmentation, self-sealability, extractive, and compatibility testing. Proper packaging protects pharmaceutical products and quality testing ensures the materials are suitable for drug products.
Quality control test: Containers, Closures and Secondary packing materialsPranali Polshettiwar
This document summarizes quality control tests for containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials. It describes common materials used for each, such as glass, plastic, metal for containers and rubber, plastic, metal for closures. Key quality tests for containers include powdered glass test, water attack test, hydrolytic resistance test, and thermal shock test. Tests for closures include residue on evaporation, pH of extract, and sterility. Secondary packaging materials like paper and cardboard are also tested for quality.
plastic and glass containers and its evaluation test, drug plastic considera...SUJIT DAS
This document discusses quality control tests that must be conducted on plastic containers used for pharmaceutical products. It outlines specific tests for non-parenteral and parenteral preparations, including leakage tests, clarity of extracts, and limits for substances like barium, heavy metals, and tin. It also discusses considerations for using plastic versus glass containers, noting potential issues like permeation of gases/liquids, leaching of substances from the plastic, and chemical reactions between drugs and container materials.
This document outlines various quality control tests performed on pharmaceutical packaging and containers. It discusses QC tests for containers made of glass, plastic, and metal to test for chemical resistance, leakage, pressure resistance, and other properties. It also summarizes QC tests for closures like sterility testing, fragmentation testing, and pH testing of aqueous extracts. Finally, common QC tests for secondary packaging materials like paper and board are mentioned, including moisture content, strength, and barrier property testing. The document provides detailed methods and acceptance criteria for many important packaging quality control tests.
Quality control test of glass containersdipsborse875
This document outlines several quality control tests performed on glass containers, including chemical resistance testing via powdered glass and water attack tests, hydrolytic resistance testing, arsenic testing for containers used for aqueous parenterals, and thermal shock testing. The tests involve procedures like grinding samples to powder, titrating solutions, and measuring absorbance to ensure glass containers can adequately resist chemicals, pressure, heat, and leaching of contaminants.
This document outlines quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including containers, closures, and secondary packaging. It describes tests for glass, plastic, metal and rubber containers to test properties like chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, sterility and leakage. Tests are also described for closures to evaluate sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability and extractable substances. Finally, common tests for secondary packaging materials like paper and board are mentioned including moisture content, folding endurance and burst resistance.
This document discusses quality control testing of pharmaceutical packaging materials. It begins by defining packaging and explaining that quality control of packaging starts at the design stage to identify and minimize potential quality problems. It then covers common quality control tests for different packaging components like containers, closures, and secondary packaging materials. These include tests to check properties like chemical resistance, hydrolytic resistance, leakage, dimensional specifications and more. The document provides details on test methods and acceptance criteria for ensuring packaging components meet quality standards.
Quality control test for packaging material ,qc test for glass,metal,rubberKunalPatel257
This document describes quality control tests for various pharmaceutical packaging materials including containers, closures, and secondary packaging. It provides details on tests for glass, plastic, and metal containers to evaluate properties like chemical resistance, leakage, hydrolytic resistance, and thermal shock resistance. Tests for closures examine sterility, fragmentation, self-sealability, pH, and absorption. Secondary packaging materials are tested for moisture content, folding endurance, air permeability, tensile strength, and burst resistance. The document provides testing methodologies and acceptance limits for ensuring packaging integrity and suitability for drug products.
Selection and Evaluation of Pharmaceutical packaging materials and.pptxAbhishekVinod8
The document discusses various packaging materials used in the pharmaceutical industry including glass, plastic, and metal containers as well as different types of closures. It provides details on the properties, types, evaluation, and testing of these packaging materials to ensure they are suitable for holding pharmaceutical products and meeting regulatory standards. Selection of the appropriate packaging material is based on factors like the route of administration, physical form of the product, stability requirements, and cost considerations.
University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences is a flag bearer of excellence in Pharmaceutical education and research in the country. Here is another initiative to make study material available to everyone worldwide. Based on the new PCI guidelines and syllabus here we have a presentation dealing with "Quality control of packaging materials."
Thank you for reading.
we hope it was helpful to you.
UIPS,PU team
This document discusses quality control testing standards and procedures for pharmaceutical packaging materials. It outlines tests for various packaging components like glass containers, plastic packaging, and rubber stoppers. Key tests described include appearance and dimensional checks, compatibility testing, chemical resistance tests like powdered glass tests and water attack tests, sterility validation tests for sterile products, and non-sterile product validation tests. The document emphasizes that quality control testing is important to ensure packaging and components are defect-free and can safely contain drug products.
This document summarizes quality control testing procedures for various packing materials, including glass containers, plastic containers, closures, collapsible tubes, metallic tins, and strip and blister packages. Key tests described are powdered glass testing and water attack testing for glass containers, leakage and water vapor permeability testing for plastic containers, sterility and pH testing for closures, leakage and lacquer compatibility testing for collapsible tubes, dimensional measurements and cleanliness checks for metallic tins, and moisture ingress testing for strip and blister packages. The tests are designed to evaluate properties like integrity, permeability, compatibility, and cleanliness to ensure the packing materials meet quality standards.
Quality control of packaging material.pptxEasy Concept
The selection of package begins with determination of products physical & chemical characteristics.
Quality control of a packaging component starts at design stage. All the aspects of a pack development may give rise to quality problems. It must be identified & minimized by performing quality control tests.
This document discusses various tests used to evaluate pharmaceutical ointments and determine their quality. It describes physical tests like examining appearance, measuring particle size, checking weight variation and testing absorption, penetration and drug release rates. It also covers microbiological tests to check microbial content and preservative efficacy. Specific methods are provided for particle size determination, weight variation testing, and evaluating absorption rate. The document emphasizes that these tests are important to characterize individual drug and excipient properties and how moisture can impact them.
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...IJECEIAES
This paper describes a speed control device for generating electrical energy on an electricity network based on the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) used for wind power conversion systems. At first, a double-fed induction generator model was constructed. A control law is formulated to govern the flow of energy between the stator of a DFIG and the energy network using three types of controllers: proportional integral (PI), sliding mode controller (SMC) and second order sliding mode controller (SOSMC). Their different results in terms of power reference tracking, reaction to unexpected speed fluctuations, sensitivity to perturbations, and resilience against machine parameter alterations are compared. MATLAB/Simulink was used to conduct the simulations for the preceding study. Multiple simulations have shown very satisfying results, and the investigations demonstrate the efficacy and power-enhancing capabilities of the suggested control system.
Comparative analysis between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquapon...bijceesjournal
The aquaponic system of planting is a method that does not require soil usage. It is a method that only needs water, fish, lava rocks (a substitute for soil), and plants. Aquaponic systems are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Its use not only helps to plant in small spaces but also helps reduce artificial chemical use and minimizes excess water use, as aquaponics consumes 90% less water than soil-based gardening. The study applied a descriptive and experimental design to assess and compare conventional and reconstructed aquaponic methods for reproducing tomatoes. The researchers created an observation checklist to determine the significant factors of the study. The study aims to determine the significant difference between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquaponics systems propagating tomatoes in terms of height, weight, girth, and number of fruits. The reconstructed aquaponics system’s higher growth yield results in a much more nourished crop than the traditional aquaponics system. It is superior in its number of fruits, height, weight, and girth measurement. Moreover, the reconstructed aquaponics system is proven to eliminate all the hindrances present in the traditional aquaponics system, which are overcrowding of fish, algae growth, pest problems, contaminated water, and dead fish.
Discover the latest insights on Data Driven Maintenance with our comprehensive webinar presentation. Learn about traditional maintenance challenges, the right approach to utilizing data, and the benefits of adopting a Data Driven Maintenance strategy. Explore real-world examples, industry best practices, and innovative solutions like FMECA and the D3M model. This presentation, led by expert Jules Oudmans, is essential for asset owners looking to optimize their maintenance processes and leverage digital technologies for improved efficiency and performance. Download now to stay ahead in the evolving maintenance landscape.
Null Bangalore | Pentesters Approach to AWS IAMDivyanshu
#Abstract:
- Learn more about the real-world methods for auditing AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) as a pentester. So let us proceed with a brief discussion of IAM as well as some typical misconfigurations and their potential exploits in order to reinforce the understanding of IAM security best practices.
- Gain actionable insights into AWS IAM policies and roles, using hands on approach.
#Prerequisites:
- Basic understanding of AWS services and architecture
- Familiarity with cloud security concepts
- Experience using the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI.
- For hands on lab create account on [killercoda.com](https://killercoda.com/cloudsecurity-scenario/)
# Scenario Covered:
- Basics of IAM in AWS
- Implementing IAM Policies with Least Privilege to Manage S3 Bucket
- Objective: Create an S3 bucket with least privilege IAM policy and validate access.
- Steps:
- Create S3 bucket.
- Attach least privilege policy to IAM user.
- Validate access.
- Exploiting IAM PassRole Misconfiguration
-Allows a user to pass a specific IAM role to an AWS service (ec2), typically used for service access delegation. Then exploit PassRole Misconfiguration granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
- Objective: Demonstrate how a PassRole misconfiguration can grant unauthorized access.
- Steps:
- Allow user to pass IAM role to EC2.
- Exploit misconfiguration for unauthorized access.
- Access sensitive resources.
- Exploiting IAM AssumeRole Misconfiguration with Overly Permissive Role
- An overly permissive IAM role configuration can lead to privilege escalation by creating a role with administrative privileges and allow a user to assume this role.
- Objective: Show how overly permissive IAM roles can lead to privilege escalation.
- Steps:
- Create role with administrative privileges.
- Allow user to assume the role.
- Perform administrative actions.
- Differentiation between PassRole vs AssumeRole
Try at [killercoda.com](https://killercoda.com/cloudsecurity-scenario/)
Introduction- e - waste – definition - sources of e-waste– hazardous substances in e-waste - effects of e-waste on environment and human health- need for e-waste management– e-waste handling rules - waste minimization techniques for managing e-waste – recycling of e-waste - disposal treatment methods of e- waste – mechanism of extraction of precious metal from leaching solution-global Scenario of E-waste – E-waste in India- case studies.
Applications of artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering.pdfAtif Razi
Historically, mechanical engineering has relied heavily on human expertise and empirical methods to solve complex problems. With the introduction of computer-aided design (CAD) and finite element analysis (FEA), the field took its first steps towards digitization. These tools allowed engineers to simulate and analyze mechanical systems with greater accuracy and efficiency. However, the sheer volume of data generated by modern engineering systems and the increasing complexity of these systems have necessitated more advanced analytical tools, paving the way for AI.
AI offers the capability to process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make predictions with a level of speed and accuracy unattainable by traditional methods. This has profound implications for mechanical engineering, enabling more efficient design processes, predictive maintenance strategies, and optimized manufacturing operations. AI-driven tools can learn from historical data, adapt to new information, and continuously improve their performance, making them invaluable in tackling the multifaceted challenges of modern mechanical engineering.
Rainfall intensity duration frequency curve statistical analysis and modeling...bijceesjournal
Using data from 41 years in Patna’ India’ the study’s goal is to analyze the trends of how often it rains on a weekly, seasonal, and annual basis (1981−2020). First, utilizing the intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curve and the relationship by statistically analyzing rainfall’ the historical rainfall data set for Patna’ India’ during a 41 year period (1981−2020), was evaluated for its quality. Changes in the hydrologic cycle as a result of increased greenhouse gas emissions are expected to induce variations in the intensity, length, and frequency of precipitation events. One strategy to lessen vulnerability is to quantify probable changes and adapt to them. Techniques such as log-normal, normal, and Gumbel are used (EV-I). Distributions were created with durations of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 24 h and return times of 2, 5, 10, 25, and 100 years. There were also mathematical correlations discovered between rainfall and recurrence interval.
Findings: Based on findings, the Gumbel approach produced the highest intensity values, whereas the other approaches produced values that were close to each other. The data indicates that 461.9 mm of rain fell during the monsoon season’s 301st week. However, it was found that the 29th week had the greatest average rainfall, 92.6 mm. With 952.6 mm on average, the monsoon season saw the highest rainfall. Calculations revealed that the yearly rainfall averaged 1171.1 mm. Using Weibull’s method, the study was subsequently expanded to examine rainfall distribution at different recurrence intervals of 2, 5, 10, and 25 years. Rainfall and recurrence interval mathematical correlations were also developed. Further regression analysis revealed that short wave irrigation, wind direction, wind speed, pressure, relative humidity, and temperature all had a substantial influence on rainfall.
Originality and value: The results of the rainfall IDF curves can provide useful information to policymakers in making appropriate decisions in managing and minimizing floods in the study area.
artificial intelligence and data science contents.pptxGauravCar
What is artificial intelligence? Artificial intelligence is the ability of a computer or computer-controlled robot to perform tasks that are commonly associated with the intellectual processes characteristic of humans, such as the ability to reason.
› ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) | Definitio
Batteries -Introduction – Types of Batteries – discharging and charging of battery - characteristics of battery –battery rating- various tests on battery- – Primary battery: silver button cell- Secondary battery :Ni-Cd battery-modern battery: lithium ion battery-maintenance of batteries-choices of batteries for electric vehicle applications.
Fuel Cells: Introduction- importance and classification of fuel cells - description, principle, components, applications of fuel cells: H2-O2 fuel cell, alkaline fuel cell, molten carbonate fuel cell and direct methanol fuel cells.
Embedded machine learning-based road conditions and driving behavior monitoringIJECEIAES
Car accident rates have increased in recent years, resulting in losses in human lives, properties, and other financial costs. An embedded machine learning-based system is developed to address this critical issue. The system can monitor road conditions, detect driving patterns, and identify aggressive driving behaviors. The system is based on neural networks trained on a comprehensive dataset of driving events, driving styles, and road conditions. The system effectively detects potential risks and helps mitigate the frequency and impact of accidents. The primary goal is to ensure the safety of drivers and vehicles. Collecting data involved gathering information on three key road events: normal street and normal drive, speed bumps, circular yellow speed bumps, and three aggressive driving actions: sudden start, sudden stop, and sudden entry. The gathered data is processed and analyzed using a machine learning system designed for limited power and memory devices. The developed system resulted in 91.9% accuracy, 93.6% precision, and 92% recall. The achieved inference time on an Arduino Nano 33 BLE Sense with a 32-bit CPU running at 64 MHz is 34 ms and requires 2.6 kB peak RAM and 139.9 kB program flash memory, making it suitable for resource-constrained embedded systems.
An improved modulation technique suitable for a three level flying capacitor ...IJECEIAES
This research paper introduces an innovative modulation technique for controlling a 3-level flying capacitor multilevel inverter (FCMLI), aiming to streamline the modulation process in contrast to conventional methods. The proposed
simplified modulation technique paves the way for more straightforward and
efficient control of multilevel inverters, enabling their widespread adoption and
integration into modern power electronic systems. Through the amalgamation of
sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) with a high-frequency square wave
pulse, this controlling technique attains energy equilibrium across the coupling
capacitor. The modulation scheme incorporates a simplified switching pattern
and a decreased count of voltage references, thereby simplifying the control
algorithm.
2. QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR
GLASSES
1) CHEMICAL RESISTANT OF GLASS CONTAINERS
A)POWDERED GLASS TEST: It is done to estimate the amount of alkali leached
from the powdered glass which usually happens at the elevated temperatures. When
the glass is powdered, leaching of alkali is enhanced, which can be titrated with 0.02N
sulphuric acid using methyl red as an indicator
Step-1: Preparation of glass specimen: Few containers are rinsed thoroughly with
purified water and dried with stream of clean air. Grind the containers in a mortar to a
fine powder and pass through sieve no.20 and 50.
Step-2: Washing the specimen: 10gm of the above specimen is taken into 250 ml
conical flask and wash it with 30 ml acetone. Repeat the washing, decant the acetone
and dried after which it is used within 48hr.
Procedure:
10gm sample is added with 50ml of high purity water in a 250ml flask. Place it in an
autoclave at 121⁰C±2⁰C for 30min.Cool it under running water. Decant the solution into
another flask, wash again with 15ml high purity water and again decant. Titrate
immediately with 0.02N sulphuric acid using methyl red as an indicator and record the
volume.
Packagin
g
2
3. B) WATER ATTACK
TEST:
This is only for treated soda lime glass containers under the controlled humidity
conditions which neutralize the surface alkali and glass will become chemically
more resistant.
Principle involved is whether the alkali leached or not from the surface of the container.
Procedure: Rinse thoroughly with high purity water. Fill each container to 90%of its
overflow capacity with water and is autoclaved at 121⁰C for 30min then it is cooled and
the liquid is decanted which is titrated with 0.02N sulphuric acid using methyl red as an
indicator. The volume of sulfuric acid consumed is the measure of the amount of alkaline
oxides present in the glass containers.
TESTS CONTAINER VOL.OF 0.02N H2SO4
Powdered glass test Type I 1.0
Type II 8.5
Type III 15.0
Water attack test Type II(100ml or
below) Type
II(above 100ml)
0.07
0.02
9/18/2016 3
4. 2) HYDROLYTIC RESISTANCE OF GLASS
CONTAINERS:
Rinse each container at least 3times with CO2 free water and fill with the same to
their filling volume. Also fill & Cover the vials and bottles and keep in autoclave. Heat
to 100⁰C for 10min and allow the steam to issue from the vent cork. Rise the temp
from 100⁰C to 121⁰C over
20min. Maintain the temp at 121⁰C to 122⁰C for 60min.Lower the temp from 121⁰C to
100C over 40min venting to prevent vacuum.
Remove the container from autoclave, cool and combine the liquids being examined.
Measure the volume of test solution into a conical flask and titrate with 0.01M HCl
using methyl red as an indicator. Perform blank with water and the difference between
the titration represents the volume of HCl consumed by the test solution.
TABLE 1
Nominal
capacity of
container (ml)
Number of containers
to be used
Volume of test solution to
be used for titration
(ml)
5 or less at least 10 50.0
6 to 30 at least 5 50.0
More than 30
9/18/2016
at least 3
Packagin
100.0
g 4
6. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
6
3) ARSENIC
TEST:
This test is for glass containers intended for aqueous parenterals. Wash the inner
and outer surface of container with fresh distilled water for 5min.Prep test as
described in the test for hydrolytic resistance for an adequate no.of samples to
produce 50ml.pipette out 10ml solution from combined contents of all ampoules to
the flask. Add 10ml of HNO3 to dryness on the water bath, dry the residue in an
oven at 130⁰C for 30min cool and add 10ml hydrogen molybdate reagent .Swirl to
dissolve and heat under water bath and reflux for 25min. Cool to room temp and
determine the absorbance at 840nm.Do the blank with 10ml hydrogen molybdate.
The absorbance of the test solution should not exceed the absorbance obtained by
repeating the determination using 0.1ml of arsenic standard solution (10ppm) in place
of test soln.
4) THERMAL SHOCK TEST:
Place the samples in upright position in a tray. Immerse the tray into a hot water for a
given time and transfers to cold water bath, temp of both are closely controlled. Examine
cracks or breaks before and after the test. The amount of thermal shock a bottle can
withstand depends on its size, design and glass distribution. Small bottles withstand a
temp differential of 60 to 80⁰C and 1 pint bottle 30 to 40⁰C.A typical test uses 45C temp
difference between hot and cold water.
7. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
7
5) INTERNAL BURSTING PRESSURE TEST:
The most common instrument used is American glass research increment pressure
tester .The test bottle is filled with water and placed inside the test chamber. A scaling
head is applied and the internal pressure automatically raised by a series of
increments each of which is held for a set of time. The bottle can be checked to a
preselected pressure level and the test continues until the container finally bursts.
6) LEAKAGE TEST:
Drug filled container is placed in a container filled with coloured solution (due to the
addition of dye)which is at high pressure compared to the pressure inside the glass
container so that the coloured solution enters the container if any cracks or any
breakage is present.
8. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
8
QUALITY CONTROL OF PACKING
MATERIALS
1) LEAKAGE TEST:
Fill 10 containers with water, fit with intended closures and keep them inverted at
room temperature for 24hr.The test is said to be passed if there is no signs of
leakage from any container.
2)COLLAPSIBILITY TEST:
This test is applicable to the containers which are to be squeezed for removing the
contents. A container by collapsing inward during use, yield at least 90% of its normal
contents at the required rate of flow at ambient temperature.
9. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
9
3) CLARITY OF AQUEOUS
EXTRACT:
Select unlabelled, unmarked and non laminated portions from suitable containers,
taken at random. Cut these portions into strips, none of which has a total surface
area of 20sq.cm.Wash the strips free from extraneous matter by shaking them with
at least two separate portions of distilled water for about 30sec. In each case and
drain off the water thoroughly.
Thus processed sample is taken in to the flask, previously cleaned with chromic
acid mixtures and rinsed with several portions of distilled water and added 250ml
dist water. Cover the flask and autoclave at 121⁰C for 30min.Carry out the blank
determination using 250ml dist water. Cool and examine the extract, it should be
colourless and free from turbidity.
4) WATER VAPOUR PERMEABILITY:
Fill 5 containers with normal volume of water and heat seal the bottles with an
aluminum foil. Weigh accurately each container and allowed to stand for 14days at a
relative humidity of 60±5% and a temperature between 20 and 25⁰C.Reweigh the
containers. The loss in weight in each container is NMT 0.2%
5) TRANSPARENCY TEST:
Standard suspension preparation: 1gm hydrazine sulphate in 100ml water and set
aside for
6hr.take 25ml of this solution and add 25ml of 10%w/v hexamine and stand for 24hr.
Test solution preparation: Sample is prepared by 16fold dilution of the standard
suspension. Fill 5 containers cloudiness detectable when compared to water filled
containers. Absorbance is measured at 640nm and the range is within 0.37 and 0.43.
10. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
10
QUALITY CONTROL OF
CLOSURES
PREPARATION OF SAMPLE(SOL.-A): Wash closures in 0.2%w/v of
anionic surface active agents for 5min.Rinse 5 times with dist water and add 200ml
water and is subjected to autoclave at 119 to 123⁰C for 20 to 30min covering with
aluminum foil. Cool and separate solution from closure (soln-A).
1) STERILITY TEST:
When treated closures are subjected to sterilization test at 64-66⁰C and a pressure
of about
0.7 KPa for 24hr.
11. 2) Fragmentation
test
For
closure
s
for
aqueou
s
preparation
s
place a vol of
water
corresponding to the
nominal vol minus 4
ml in each of 12
clean vials
close the vials with the
‘prepared’ closures & allow
to stand for 16 hours.
For
closure
s
for dry
preparation
s
close 12 clean vials with
the ‘prepared’ closures.
Using a hypodermic
needle with an external
diameter of 0.8 mm inject
1 ml of water into the vial
and remove 1 ml of air
Carry out
this
operation 4 times
with new needle
each time
Passthe liquid in
the vials through
a
filter with a
pore
s
size of 0.5
µm.
No. of fragments
is
NMT 10 except in the
case of butyl rubber
closures where the
total no. of fragments
is NMT 15
9/18/201
6
Packagin
g
11
12. 3)Self –
sealability
• This test is applicable to closures
intended to be used with water
close the
vials with
the
‘Prepared’
closures
For each closure, use a
new hypodermic needle
with an external diameter
of 0.8 mm & pierce the
closure 10 times, each
time at a different site.
Immerse the vials
upright in a 0.1%
w/v solution of
methylene blue &
reduce the external
pressure by 27KPa
for 10 min.
Restore the atmospheric
pressure and leave the
vials immersed for 30
minutes.
Rinse the outside of
the vials.
None of the
vials contains
any trace of
coloured
solution.
9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 12
13. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 13
4) PH OF AQUEOUS
EXTRACT:
20ml of solution A is added with 0.1ml bromothymol blue when it is added with a small
amount of 0.01M NaOH which changes the colour from blue to yellow. The volume of
NaOH required is NMT 0.3ml and if it is done with HCl, the volume of HCl needed should
NMT0.8ml.
5) LIGHT ABSORPTION TEST:
It must be done within 4hrs of preparing solution A. It is filtered through 0.5μ filter and its
absorbance is measured at 220 to 360nm.Blank is done without closures and
absorbance is NMT 2.0.
6) REDUCING SUBSTANCES:
20ml of solution A is added with 1ml of 1M H2SO4 and 20ml of 0.002M KMnO4 and boil
for 3min then cool and add 1gm of potassium iodide which is titrated with sodium thio-
sulphate using starch as an indicator. Blank is done and the difference between titration
volumes is NMT 0.7ml.
7) RESIDUE ON EVAPORATION:
50ml of solution A is evaporated to dryness at 105⁰C.Then weigh the residue NMT4mg.
14. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 14
QUALITY CONTROL OF
COLLAPSIBLE TUBES
1) LEAKAGE TEST:
o Water was filled in the tube and tightly closed. External surface was wiped off and
tube is kept inverted on filter paper at base. Allow to stand for 1hr.Filterpaper shows
absorption at any time during test period.
2) LACQUER CURING TEST:
A) Power of adhesion:
o Tube was spitted along the length and flattened. Cotton wool soaked in acetone was
rubbed over lacquer surface for 20min.Lacquer should not lift from surface and
cotton wool shall remain colorless.
B) Flexibility test:
o The tube was folded in such a manner that internal lacquer surface is outside. The
lacquer
coating should not be peeled off when the folded position is rubbed with finger.
3)LACQUER COMPATIBILITY TEST: 10 tubes are taken for the test. Product
was filled and crimped subjected to 45⁰C for 72hr.Tubes were allowed to cool and cut
lengthwise.
A)Product compatibility:
o Content should not show any discolorations or change in colour or gas formation.
B) Lacquer compatibility:
o Lifting or peeling of lacquer is checked.
15. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 15
QUALITY CONTROL OF
METALLIC
TIN
S
1) DESCRIPTION:
Metallic tins having smooth inner surface. The upper surface is sealed consists a clip
to break
the seal. The lower surface is open.
2) DIMENSIONS:
Height- Measure the height in mm of 10 metallic tin, individually from the lower surface
edge
to the upper rim. Limit-Specimen metallic tins with tolerance-170mm±10mm.
3) DIAMETER:
Inner diameter- Measure the
inner diameter of 10 metallic tins: Limit- NLT 98mm.
Outer diameter: Limit-NMT 105mm.
4) CLEANLINESS CHECK:
It should not be dirty, damaged, stained or consist of any foreign particles.
16. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 16
QUALITY CONTROL OF STRIP AND
BLISTERS
Procedure:
3/4th of water is poured in desiccators. The strips and blisters were
placed inside the desiccators and vacuum is applied. After sometime
vacuum was released and strips, blisters were taken out. The water
present over the outer surface of the packages was wiped off with
tissue paper. The contents of strips and blister packages were removed
and the presence of moisture was checked. If there is no leakage, the
contents will not be wetted. This indicates the perfect sealing of the
packages
17. QUALITY CONTROL OF PAPER AND BOARD
The tests pieces of paper and board are conditioned for the tests to be carried
out in standard conditions. They are: Temperature: 23⁰C±1⁰C Relative
humidity: 50%±2% Some of the tests to be performed are
9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 17
18. 9/18/201
6
Packagin
g 18
References
1. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2007, Government of Indian ministry of
health and family welfare, The Indian pharmacopoeia
commission, Ghaziabad, volume-1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 599-609.
2. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 1996, Government of Indian ministry of
health and family welfare, The controller of publications, Delhi,
volume-2, Appendix-11, A-127-137.
3. Dean D. A., Evans E. R. and Hall I. H.: Pharmaceutical
Packaging Technology, Taylor and Francis, London and New
York, First Indian reprint, 2006, 5 and 73.
4. Carter S.J., “Packaging”; Cooper and Gunn’s Tutorial
Pharmacy, sixth edition, CBS publicashers and distributors,
New Delhi, 2005, 133-136 and 139-140.
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/packaging_and_labelling