This document discusses various topics related to offender and victim behavior in cases of child sexual abuse. It covers common grooming techniques used by offenders to gain access to victims and prevent discovery of abuse. It also examines counterintuitive behaviors in victims that can present problems for prosecutors, such as delaying disclosure or maintaining a relationship with the offender. Reasons for these behaviors include shame, guilt, fear and the effects of grooming methods used by offenders. The document also provides statistics on conviction rates in cases with adolescent victims and factors that can impact case outcomes.
2. Offender Behavior:
Grooming
Victim Behavior:
Counter-Intuitive Characteristics
Delay in Disclosing or Non-Disclosure
3. What is it?
Behavior engaged in by the offender to gain access to
victims and to prevent discovery of abuse.
Types of Grooming:
Grooming of the Victim
Self Grooming
Grooming of the Environment (family, church, friends,
etc.)
4. Grandiose Sense of Self
Violation of Supervised Release
Compulsive Lying
Criminal Versatility
Superficial Charm
Sexual Promiscuity
Parasitic Lifestyle
Early Behavioral Problems
Shallow Affect
Lack of Empathy - Callous
No Remorse
Risk Taking Behavior
Impulse Control
5. Finding and Seeking out Opportunity
•Sullivan, Beech (2004) In a group of professionals
with contact victims, 41.5% indicated access factored
in to their career choice, 15% indicated solely to
abuse, 21.5% “not sure”.
•Elliott (1995) In a group of contact child sex offenders,
35% obtained victims from public places frequented by
children. 33% obtained victims by being invited into the
family home.
6. Work History of Career Sexually Violent
Pedophile. 4 victims age range of 5 to 14, male
and female:
Ice Cream Truck Driver
Travelling Carnival Worker
Bowling Alley Employee
“Poolman” at an apartment complex
7. Isolation
• Frame of reference
• Reparenting
Normalizing
• “It’s normal.”
• “It’s universal.”
• “It’s good.”
Graduation
• Desensitization
• “Foot in the door”
• Culpability: “Partners in crime”
8. Victim “Kim”: Sexually assaulted over two years by step
father. Age at time of offense 15-16.
9. Elliott (1995):
42% portrayed abuse as education or a game
24% threatened some dire consequence
24 % used anger or threat of harm
20% threatened to blame the victim
20% threatened loss of the relationship
10. Walsh, Wolak (2005):
39% showed the victim pornography
34% gave the victim alcohol or drugs
27% produced child pornography of the victim
45% possessed some child pornography
30% had jobs with access to children
11. Elliott (1995):
If the child showed fear or resistance: 61% paused
and restarted while 39% used violence or threats
49% continued to talk about sex
47% used “accidental” touches
46% used bribery or gifts
44% used verbal persuasion
19% initiated with physical force
12. Victim “Jack”: Raped over several years by
family friend beginning at age 13.
Incarcerated on methamphetamine charges at
age 19
13. How do Offenders Prepare Themselves to Act?
Elliott (1995):
22% used drugs and/or alcohol
21% viewed pornography
8% communicated with other child sex offenders
49% used personal fantasies related to previous victims
Rationalization
14. “It’s not that they’re young, it’s that
they’re small.”
15. “This all happened in the 80’s. We didn’t
know any better back then. Back then,
rape was all ‘hush hush’.”
16. “I told myself that since I was only
touching them and not having sex with
them it wasn’t so bad.”
17. “I have standards, I’d never be with anyone
under 5 years old.”
19. “She was really flirting with me, you
know how kids play ‘sex’.”
20. “Most kids are starving in Russia. They
probably feed them good to keep them
healthy.”
21. How Can Victim Behavior Present a Problem to
Prosecutors, Law Enforcement, and
Investigators?
What May Be Counter-Intuitive About their
Behaviors?
What Are Some Reasons for These Behaviors?
22. Cross et al. (2003) 94% Conviction Rate
N = 486 Walsh and Wolak (2005) Adolescent
Victim
91% Conviction
77% by Guilty Plea
14% Trial Conviction (no difference in Jury or Judge)
3% Acquittal
46% of Victims Perceived by Law Enforcement to be
In Love with or Feel a Close Friendship with the
Offender
23. No Difference in Case Outcomes Related to:
Whether the Victim Was Met Online or In Person
Whether the Offender Was in Possession of Child
Pornography
Whether the Victim Willingly Engaged in Sexual
Contact
Whether the Victim Was Cooperative in Prosecution
24. Difference in Case Outcomes Related to 3 Factors:
Lack of Honesty Affecting Victim Credibility
(Conversely, admitting illegal behavior is a positive factor)
If Truthfulness is an issue = 71% Conviction
If Not an issue = 95% Conviction
Was the Victim Given Drugs and Alcohol
Yes = 81% Conviction
No = 96% Conviction
Did the Offender Confess?
Yes = 100% Conviction
No = 81% Conviction
26. Hebert (2009), Hanson (2002), Jones (2000):
• 60% - 80% of Victims of Childhood Sexual Assault
Delay Reporting Until Adulthood
Hebert (2009):
• 21% Never Disclose
• 58% of Victims Delayed Disclosure
for 5+ years
McAlinden (2006), London (2008):
• 3% - 12% of Offenses are Detected and Reported
• 5% - 13% “
27. Sexually assaulted a 15 year old female at age
30 over a period of weeks, providing drugs.
17:00