simple problem to convert NFA with epsilon to without epsilonkanikkk
conversion of NFA,this will helps to easily solve the problems
by this small example you can solve large problems also.by solving this type of small problems we can get a more ideas to solve this type of problems
simple problem to convert NFA with epsilon to without epsilonkanikkk
conversion of NFA,this will helps to easily solve the problems
by this small example you can solve large problems also.by solving this type of small problems we can get a more ideas to solve this type of problems
Abstract:
This paper deals with the vital role of primitive polynomials for designing PN sequence generators. The standard LFSR (linear feedback shift register) used for pattern generation may give repetitive patterns. Which are in certain cases is not efficient for complete test coverage. The programmable LFSR based on primitive polynomial generates maximum-length PRPG with maximum fault coverage.
Optimizing with persistent data structures (LLVM Cauldron 2016)Igalia
By Andy Wingo.
Is there life beyond phi variables and basic blocks? Andy will report on his experience using a new intermediate representation for compiler middle-ends, "CPS soup". The CPS soup language represents programs using Clojure-inspired maps, allowing optimizations to be neatly expressed as functions from one graph to another. Using these persistent data structures also means that the source program doesn't change while the residual program is being created, eliminating one class of problems that the optimizer writer has to keep in mind. Together we will look at some example transformations from an expressiveness as well as a performance point of view, and we will also cover some advantages which a traditional SSA graph maintains over CPS soup.
Knit, Chisel, Hack: Building Programs in Guile Scheme (Strange Loop 2016)Igalia
By Andy Wingo.
This talk makes the case that Guile is a delightful medium for making crafty programs, from the most ephemeral scripts to long-lived systems that you can rely on for years. Guile takes the elegant Scheme programming language, integrates it with the POSIX environments that you know and loathe and love, and wraps it all up in a responsive, hackable environment that nurtures programs from the small up to the large. Guile hacker will give you a gentle introduction to the language as they lead you through the process of building cool stuff in Scheme. With all this going for it, maybe you will choose to make your next program in Guile!
(c) Strange Loop 2016
http://www.thestrangeloop.com/2016/sessions.html
Transformer Mods for Document Length InputsSujit Pal
The Transformer architecture is responsible for many state of the art results in Natural Language Processing. A central feature behind its superior performance over Recurrent Neural Networks is its multi-headed self-attention mechanism. However, the superior performance comes at a cost, an O(n2) time and memory complexity, where n is the size of the input sequence. Because of this, it is computationally infeasible to feed large documents to the standard transformer. To overcome this limitation, a number of approaches have been proposed, which involve modifying the self-attention mechanism in interesting ways.
In this presentation, I will describe the transformer architecture, and specifically the self-attention mechanism, and then describe some of the approaches proposed to address the O(n2) complexity. Some of these approaches have also been implemented in the HuggingFace transformers library, and I will demonstrate some code for doing document level operations using one of these approaches.
Abstract:
This paper deals with the vital role of primitive polynomials for designing PN sequence generators. The standard LFSR (linear feedback shift register) used for pattern generation may give repetitive patterns. Which are in certain cases is not efficient for complete test coverage. The programmable LFSR based on primitive polynomial generates maximum-length PRPG with maximum fault coverage.
Optimizing with persistent data structures (LLVM Cauldron 2016)Igalia
By Andy Wingo.
Is there life beyond phi variables and basic blocks? Andy will report on his experience using a new intermediate representation for compiler middle-ends, "CPS soup". The CPS soup language represents programs using Clojure-inspired maps, allowing optimizations to be neatly expressed as functions from one graph to another. Using these persistent data structures also means that the source program doesn't change while the residual program is being created, eliminating one class of problems that the optimizer writer has to keep in mind. Together we will look at some example transformations from an expressiveness as well as a performance point of view, and we will also cover some advantages which a traditional SSA graph maintains over CPS soup.
Knit, Chisel, Hack: Building Programs in Guile Scheme (Strange Loop 2016)Igalia
By Andy Wingo.
This talk makes the case that Guile is a delightful medium for making crafty programs, from the most ephemeral scripts to long-lived systems that you can rely on for years. Guile takes the elegant Scheme programming language, integrates it with the POSIX environments that you know and loathe and love, and wraps it all up in a responsive, hackable environment that nurtures programs from the small up to the large. Guile hacker will give you a gentle introduction to the language as they lead you through the process of building cool stuff in Scheme. With all this going for it, maybe you will choose to make your next program in Guile!
(c) Strange Loop 2016
http://www.thestrangeloop.com/2016/sessions.html
Transformer Mods for Document Length InputsSujit Pal
The Transformer architecture is responsible for many state of the art results in Natural Language Processing. A central feature behind its superior performance over Recurrent Neural Networks is its multi-headed self-attention mechanism. However, the superior performance comes at a cost, an O(n2) time and memory complexity, where n is the size of the input sequence. Because of this, it is computationally infeasible to feed large documents to the standard transformer. To overcome this limitation, a number of approaches have been proposed, which involve modifying the self-attention mechanism in interesting ways.
In this presentation, I will describe the transformer architecture, and specifically the self-attention mechanism, and then describe some of the approaches proposed to address the O(n2) complexity. Some of these approaches have also been implemented in the HuggingFace transformers library, and I will demonstrate some code for doing document level operations using one of these approaches.
Notation, Regular Expressions in Lexical Specification, Error Handling, Finite Automata State Graphs, Epsilon Moves, Deterministic and Non-Deterministic Automata, Table Implementation of a DFA
CS 162 Fall 2015 Homework 1 Problems September 29, 2015 Timothy Johnson 1. Ex...parmeet834
CS 162 Fall 2015
Homework 1 Problems
September 29, 2015 Timothy Johnson
1. Exercise 2.2.4 on page 53 of Hopcroft et al. Give DFA’s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}. (a) The set of all strings ending in 0
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. From DFA to NFA
• A DFA has exactly one transition from every state on
every symbol in the alphabet.
• By relaxing this requirement we get a related but
more flexible kind of automaton: the nondeterministic
finite automaton or NFA.
3. Outline
• 5.1 Relaxing a Requirement
• 5.2 Spontaneous Transitions
• 5.3 Nondeterminism
• 5.4 The 5-Tuple for an NFA
• 5.5 The Language Accepted by an NFA
4. Not A DFA
• Does not have exactly one transition from
every state on every symbol:
– Two transitions from q0 on a
– No transition from q1 (on either a or b)
• Though not a DFA, this can be taken as
defining a language, in a slightly different way
q1
a,b
q0
a
5. Possible Sequences of Moves
• We'll consider all possible sequences of moves the machine
might make for a given string
• For example, on the string aa there are three:
– From q0 to q0 to q0, rejecting
– From q0 to q0 to q1, accepting
– From q0 to q1, getting stuck on the last a
• Our convention for this new kind of machine: a string is in L(M) if
there is at least one accepting sequence
q1
a,b
q0
a
6. Nondeterministic Finite
Automaton (NFA)
• L(M) = the set of strings that have at least one accepting
sequence
• In the example above, L(M) = {xa | x ∈ {a,b}*}
• A DFA is a special case of an NFA:
– An NFA that happens to be deterministic: there is exactly one
transition from every state on every symbol
– So there is exactly one possible sequence for every string
• NFA is not necessarily deterministic
q1
a,b
q0
a
7. NFA Example
• This NFA accepts only
those strings that end in
01
• Running in “parallel
threads” for string
1100101
q0Start q1 q2
0 1
0,1
q0
q0
q0
q0
q0
1
1
0
0
q1 - stuck
q0
q0
1
1
0
q0
q1
q2 - stuck
q1
q2 - accept
q0
q0
q0
q0
q0
1
1
0
0
q1 - stuck
q0
q0
1
1
0
q0
q1
q2 - stuck
q1
q2 - accept
8. Nondeterminism
• The essence of nondeterminism:
– For a given input there can be more than one legal
sequence of steps
– The input is in the language if at least one of the legal
sequences says so
• We can achieve the same result by computing all
legal sequences in parallel and then deterministically
search the legal sequences that accept the input,
but…
• ...this nondeterminism does not directly correspond to
anything in physical computer systems
• In spite of that, NFAs have many practical
applications
10. DFAs and NFAs
• DFAs and NFAs both define languages
• DFAs do it by giving a simple computational procedure for
deciding language membership:
– Start in the start state
– Make one transition on each symbol in the string
– See if the final state is accepting
• NFAs do it by considering all possible transitions in parallel.
11. NFA Advantage
• An NFA for a language can be smaller and easier to construct than a
DFA
• Let L={x ∈ {0,1}*|where x is a string whose next-to-last symbol is 1}
• Construct both a DFA and NFA for recognizing L.
DFA:
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
NFA:
0,1
0,1
1
12. Outline
• 5.1 Relaxing a Requirement
• 5.2 Spontaneous Transitions
• 5.3 Nondeterminism
• 5.4 The 5-Tuple for an NFA
• 5.5 The Language Accepted by an NFA
13. Spontaneous Transitions
• An NFA can make a state transition
spontaneously, without consuming an input
symbol
• Shown as an arrow labeled with ε
• For example, {a}* ∪ {b}*:
q0
aq1
q2
ε
ε
b
14. ε-Transitions To Accepting States
• An ε-transition can be made at any time
• For example, there are three sequences on the empty string
– No moves, ending in q0, rejecting
– From q0 to q1, accepting
– From q0 to q2, accepting
• Any state with an ε-transition to an accepting state ends up
working like an accepting state too
q0
aq1
q2
ε
ε
b
15. ε-transitions For NFA Combining
• ε-transitions are useful for combining smaller
automata into larger ones
• This machine is combines a machine for {a}*
and a machine for {b}*
• It uses an ε-transition at the start to achieve
the union of the two languages
q0
aq1
q2
ε
ε
b
16. Revisiting Union
A = {an | n is odd}
B = {bn | n is odd}
A ∪ B
a
a
b
b
a
a
b
b
ε
ε
17. Concatenation
A = {an | n is odd}
B = {bn | n is odd}
{xy | x ∈ A and y ∈ B}
a
a
b
b
ε
a
a
b
b
19. • Let Σ = {a, b, c}. Give an NFA M that accepts:
L = {x | x is in Σ* and x contains ab}
q1q0
q2
a
a,b,c
b
a,b,c
More Exercises
20. • Let Σ = {a, b}. Give an NFA M that accepts:
L = {x | x is in Σ* and the third to the last symbol in x is b}
q1q0
b q3
a/b
a/b
q2
a/b
One More Exercise
21. NFA Exercise
• Construct an NFA that will accept strings over
alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that the last symbol appears
at least twice, but without any intervening higher
symbol, in between:
– e.g., 11, 2112, 123113, 3212113, etc.
• Trick: use start state to mean “I guess I haven't seen
the symbol that matches the ending symbol yet.”
Use three other states to represent a guess that the
matching symbol has been seen, and remembers
what that symbol is.
23. Outline
• 5.1 Relaxing a Requirement
• 5.2 Spontaneous Transitions
• 5.3 Nondeterminism
• 5.4 The 5-Tuple for an NFA
• 5.5 The Language Accepted by an NFA
24. Powerset
• If S is a set, the powerset of S is the set of all subsets of S:
P(S) = {R | R ⊆ S}
• This always includes the empty set and S itself
• For example,
P({1,2,3}) = {{}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {2,3}, {1,2,3}}
25. The 5-Tuple
• The only change from a DFA is the transition function δ
• δ takes two inputs:
– A state from Q (the current state)
– A symbol from Σ∪{ε} (the next input, or ε for an ε-transition)
• δ produces one output:
– A subset of Q (the set of possible next states - since multiple transitions can
happen in parallel!)
An NFA M is a 5-tuple M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0, F), where:
Q is the finite set of states
Σ is the alphabet (that is, a finite set of symbols)
δ ∈ (Q × (Σ∪{ε}) → P(Q) is the transition function
q0 ∈ Q is the start state
F ⊆ Q is the set of accepting states
26. Example:
• Formally, M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0, F), where
– Q = {q0,q1,q2}
– Σ = {a,b} (we assume: it must contain at least a and b)
– F = {q2}
– δ(q0,a) = {q0,q1}, δ(q0,b) = {q0}, δ(q0,ε) = {q2},
δ(q1,a) = {}, δ(q1,b) = {q2}, δ(q1,ε) = {}
δ(q2,a) = {}, δ(q2,b) = {}, δ(q2,ε) = {}
• The language defined is {a,b}*
q0 q1
a
q2
b
ε
a,b
27. Outline
• 5.1 Relaxing a Requirement
• 5.2 Spontaneous Transitions
• 5.3 Nondeterminism
• 5.4 The 5-Tuple for an NFA
• 5.5 The Language Accepted by an NFA
28. The δ* Function
• The δ function gives 1-symbol moves
• We'll define δ* so it gives whole-string results
(by applying zero or more δ moves)
• For DFAs, we used this recursive definition
– δ*(q,ε) = q
– δ*(q,xa) = δ(δ*(q,x),a)
• The intuition is similar for NFAs taking parallel
transitions into account, but the
ε-transitions add some technical difficulties
29. NFA IDs
• An instantaneous description (ID) is a
description of a point in an NFA's execution
• It is a pair (q,x) where
– q ∈ Q is the current state
– x ∈ Σ* is the unread part of the input
• Initially, an NFA processing a string x has the
ID (q0,x)
• An accepting sequence of moves ends in an
ID (f,ε) for some accepting state f ∈ F
30. The One-Move Relation On IDs
• We write
if I is an ID and J is an ID that could follow
from I after one move of the NFA
• That is, for any string x ∈ Σ* and any a ∈ Σ or
a = ε,€
I J
q,ax( ) r,x( ) if and only if r ∈ δ q,a( )
31. The Zero-Or-More-Move Relation
• We write
if there is a sequence of zero or more moves
that starts with I and ends with J:
• Because it allows zero moves, it is a reflexive
relation: for all IDs I,
€
I ∗
J
€
I J
I ∗
I
32. The δ* Function
• Now we can define the δ*
function for NFAs:
• Intuitively, δ*(q,x) is the set of all
states the NFA might be in after
starting in state q and reading x€
δ∗
q,x( ) = r q,x( ) ∗
r,ε( ){ }
33. M Accepts x
• Now δ*(q,x) is the set of states M may end in,
starting from state q and reading all of string x
• So δ*(q0,x) tells us whether M accepts x by
computing all possible states by executing all
possible transitions in parallel on the string x:
A string x ∈ Σ* is accepted by an NFA M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0, F)
if and only if the set δ*(q0, x) contains at least one
element of F.
34. For any NFA M = (Q, Σ, δ, q0, F), L(M) denotes
the language accepted by M, which is
L(M) = {x ∈ Σ* | δ*(q0, x) ∩ F ≠ {}}.
The Language An NFA Defines
36. Exercise
• Theorem: Let M be an NFA with a single accepting
state, show how to construct the 5-tuple for a new
NFA, say N, with
L(N) = { xy | x∈ L(M) and y∈ L(M)}.
Show that the language of construct NFA is indeed
L(N) as specified.
• Proof Idea: The idea here is to make two copies of
the NFA, linking the accepting state of the first to the
start state of the second. The accepting state of the
second copy becomes the only accepting state in the
new machine.