Cancer Nasopharynx
Dr. Ajay Manickam MS.,DNB.,(ENT)
Fellow, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Tata Medical Center , Kolkata
Introduction
▪ Uncommon cancer in most parts of world
▪ 84400 new cases and 51,600 deaths annually
▪ Age Adjusted Rate ranges from 0.6 in US to
26.9 in Southern China
▪ Bimodal age distribution(15-25 + 50-59)
▪ Male to female 2-3:1
Epidemiology
Nasopharynx : Male - Thirteen north eastern registry
areas had higher AAR, Nagaland PBCR being the
highest . Delhi registry with an AAR of 0.7 stood at
the fourteenth place.
Female - Nine north eastern registry areas had higher
AAR and Nagaland PBCR led the list .
State Males (%) Females(%)
Nagaland 19.3 10.9
Mizoram 2.8 2.3
Sikkim 3.7 NA
Kolkata 0.36 0.2
Proportion among all cancers
AAR per 100,000 population
Etiology
• Distinct racial and geographical distribution
• Multifactorial cause
Genetic factors
– Strong association with HLA Class 1 genes
Etiology
Environmental factor
– High consumption of salted fish – Dimethyl
nitrosamine
• Formaldehyde
• Tobacco smoking
• Wood dust
• Epstein Barr Virus (EBV)
– Particularly non-keratinising type
Anatomy
Natural History
Local Spread
Nasal cavity & PNS
Orbital invasion
Base of Skull, Clivus
Sphenoid sinus
Cavernous Sinus
Lateral Parapharyngeal space
Middle ear cavity
Oropharynx (tonsillar pillars)
C1 vertebrae
Site Frequency(%)
Adjacent soft tissue
Nasal Cavity
Parapharyngeal space
Pterygoid muscle
Oropharyngeal wall, soft palate
Prevertebral muscle
87
68
48
21
19
Bony erosion/PNS
Clivus
Sphenoid
Pterygoid plate
Petrous bone
Ethmoid
Maxillary antrum
41
38
27
19
6
4
Extensive/Intracranial extn
Cavernous sinus
Infratemporal fossa
Orbit
Cerebrum, meninges, cisterns
Hypopharynx
16
9
4
4
2
Lymph metastases
• Vast avalvular lymph capillary
network
• 85 to 90% present with lymph
nodes
• Bilaterality in 50%
• Two lymph collectors – lateral
and posterior
Distant metastases
• 3 to 6 % at presentation
• 18 to 50% in the course of disease
Clinical presentation
• Neck mass
• Nasopharyngeal mass symptoms(nasal
obstruction, epistaxis, discharge)
• Nerve deficits
Workup
• Proper history and clinical examination
– Head and neck examination
– Complete CNS examination
– Mirror examination
• Routine
– Laboratory studies
– Chest Radiograph(PA+lateral)
Diagnostic workup
• Biopsy
(direct visualisation/Fiberoptic
endoscopy/exmn anaesthesia)
• FNAC of neck mass
• Absence of visible mass
– Pharyngeal recess(Fossa of
Rosenmuller) on each of the lateral
wall
– Supero posterior wall
• IgG anti-EA and IgA anti-VCA
• Baseline EBV DNA levels
• Staging workup
• Locoregional extent – MRI>CT
Metastatic workup - if clinically indicated
• PET
• CT Chest and Abdomen
• Bone Scan
STAGING SYSTEMS
• AJCC
• UICC
• Ho(1978)
• Fletcher(1967)
Ho staging system
T-stage
T1 Confined to nasopharynx
T2 Nasal fossa, oropharynx,
parapharynx, muscle/
nerves below base of
Skull
T3
a. Bone below base of Skull
b. Bone at base of skull
c. Cranial nerve
d. Orbit, infratemporal fossa, laryngopharynx
Ho Staging - Lymphnode
N-stage
N0 None
N1 Upper neck
N2 Mid neck
N3 Supraclavicular fossa
Group
I T1N0M0
II T2N0–1M0, T1N1M0
III T3N0-2M0, T1-2N2M0
IV T1-3N3M0
V T1-4N0-3M1
AJCC/UICC 2010 7Th
T category
TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumor
Tis Carcinoma in situ
T1 Tumor confined to the nasopharynx, or tumor extends to nasal cavity and/or oropharynxb without
parapharyngeal extensionc
T2 Tumor with parapharyngeal extension
T3 Tumor involves bony structures of skull base and/or paranasal sinuses
T4 Tumor with intracranial extension and/or involvement of cranial nerves, hypopharynx, orbit, or with
extension to the infratemporal fossa/masticator space
N category
NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Unilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest
dimension, above the supraclavicular fossa, and/or unilateral or
bilateral retropharyngeal lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest
dimension
N2 Bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest
dimension, above the supraclavicular fossae,f
N3 Metastasis in lymph node(s)e >6 cm and/or to supraclavicular
fossaf
N3a. >6 cm in dimension
N3b. Extension to the supraclavicular fossaf
Pathological classification
WHO 2005
1. Keratinising squamous cell carcinoma
2. Non -
keratinising
squamous cell
carcinoma
a – Differentiated
b - Undifferentiated
3. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma
• Rare histologies
– Lymphoma 5%
– Adenocarcinoma
– Plasmocytoma
– Melanoma
– Sarcoma
Prognostic factors
• Locoregional extent of disease
– T stage
– N stage
– Parapharyngeal extension
– Prevertebral space involvement
• GTV-P
• Histology
• Oropharynx involvement, Ethnicity – not
significant
Prognostic factors - contd
• Role of EBV - Circulating cell free DNA
– Pre-treatment assay
– Response to treatment
– Follow up(better than FDG PET)
• Other biomarkers associated with poor
prognosis - EGFR, HIF1α, CA IX, VEGF
Treatment
• Stage wise management
Radiotherapy alone
• T1N0M0
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone
• T1NOMO(Bulky and old T2a)
• T2NOMO
Treatment - contd
T2-4 N0-3 M0
• Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 2# + CCRT
• CCRT + adjuvant chemotherapy
• ALSARAF – GAMECHANGER + DRAWBACK
Concurrent chemotherapy
• Cisplatin (30 mg/m2 weekly for 05 to 06
Cycles with RT)
• Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 Day 01, 22 and 43 with
RT )
• Non inferiority trial substituting CDDP with
carboplatin in concurrent(weekly) and
adjuvant setting showed no significant
difference
Induction/Sequential chemotherapy
Regime (i)
TIP Protocol:Paclitaxel ( 175 mg/m2 Day 01),Cisplatin (20 mg/m2 Day 01 to
Day 05),Ifosfamide (1200 mg/m2 Day 01 to Day 05 ) and Mesna ( 400
mg/m2 at 0, 4, 8 hrs Day 01 to Day 05) X 2 Cycles
Regime (ii)
DCF Protocol:Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 Day 01), Cisplatin (75 mg/m2 Day 01 )
and 5-FU ( 750 mg/m2 /day continuous IV infusion through PICC Day 01 to
Day 05 Total dose in 5 days 3750 mg/m2) X 2 Cycles
Regime (iii)
Cisplatin(33mg / m2 / day x 3 days) + Ifosfamide (2gm/m2 / day x 3
days) + Mesna rescue X 2 Cycles
Regime (iv)
Cisplatin(100 mg/m2 day 01 and 5 FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous IV
infusion through PICC Day 01 to Day 05) X 2 cycles
Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 01 and 5 FU 1000
mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion through PICC Day 01 to Day 05) X 3
cycles
Metastatic NPC
▪ Platinum based combination chemotherapy
▪ RT to metastatic sites if clinically indicated
– Cisplatin/carboplatin + Taxane
– Cisplatin + 5FU
– Carboplatin + cetuximab
– Cisplatin + gemcitabine
– Gemcitabine + Vinorelbine
▪ If CR after chemotherapy, patient should be
considered for RT/CRT to npx and neck
RT dose and fractionation
▪ Conventional fractionation
70 Gy given over 7 weeks
2 Gy# Mon-Fri
▪ High risk subclinical disease – 60 Gy
▪ Elective sites – 50 Gy
Conventional technique
SHRINKING FIELD TECHNIQUE
3 phases
Phase I
• RT to the primary tumor
and upper neck nodes in
one volume – 2 lateral
fields
• Lower neck by single AP
field
• Continued upto 40- 44Gy
Phase II
• RT to the primary by 2 lateral
fields
• Or by 2 lateral fields and a
matching anterior field
Phase III
• Boost to the gross disease
3DCRT
3DCRT
• Better LC and OS
Jen et al
• T4 control (86% vs 47%)
• Xerostomia (69.2% vs 98%)
• No significant improvement in late toxicities
IMRT
• Supplanted conventional technique
Typical plans
• 70 Gy to Gross disease
• 59.4 Gy to high risk subclinical disease
• 54 Gy to low risk
• TMC – 66 Gy in 30 #
• <42 days - Tumour Repopulation
IMRT - contd
• Acceleration using dose painting/ SMART
• Boost for persistent disease
• Recurrent disease
TREATMENT PLANNING - TMC
Sequelae to RT
Temporal lobe necrosis
• Late complication
• Classical symptoms - hallucinations, absence
attacks, déjà vu
• Other symptoms – headache, confusion,
convulsions, hemipareisis
• Accounts for up to 65% of radiation related
deaths
• 1-3% with conventional RT
• 12% with hypofractionated IMRT
Sequelae - contd
Cranial neuropathy
• Nerves IX to XII
• Slurring of speech, dysphagia, twitching of
neck muscles
• Radiation induced fibrsosis
• Parapharyngeal boost
• Rarely nerve VI, V also
Sequelae - contd
Xerostomia
• Accompanied by dental sequelae
• Lower rates with IMRT
Aural toxicity
• Cisplatin based chemotherpay
• SNHL with mean cohclear dose > 48 Gy
• Pharyngotympanic tube damage
Sequelae - contd
Endocrine dysfunction
• Hyperprolactinemia
• Hypothyroidism
• Hypoadrenalism
Second malignancy
• Maxillary osteosarcoma and soft tissue
sarcoma
• Surgery – only chance of cure
Follow up
History and physical examination
– 1 to 3 months the first year after treatment
– 2 to 6 months the second year
– 4 to 8 months 3 to 5 years
– Every year thereafter
With
✓ Imaging every 6 months
✓ Thyroid function testing every 6 to 12 months
✓ Speech and swallowing evaluation.
✓ Post treatment plasma EBV DNA surveillance if
facilities available
• Cranial nerve palsies 6 months post Rx
– The complete recovery rate was 51%
– Partial recovery rate was 19%
– Worst for 7, 12th CN
– Best for 2, 9, 11th CN
• Patient usually assessed after 6 weeks
• Residual disease after 8 weeks – persistent
• Persistent disease – boost
– Brachytherapy
– IMRT
– SRT
– EBRT
• Persistent nodal disease
– Electron boost
– Neck dissection
Results of treatment
• 5 yr local control rate with conventional
radiation
T1 – 76 to 90% N0 – 82 to 100%
T2 – 75 to 85% N1 – 70 to 92%
T3 – 60 to 70% N2 – 42 to 70%
T4 – 40 to 60% N3 – 32 to 52%
• 5 yr distant metastases rates – 10, 20, 30, 50% for
T1,2,3,4 respectively
Salvage irradiation
• Local relapse at a median period of 3 years
post RT
• Reirradiation requires atleast 60 Gy
– 2D EBRT ± brachytherapy boost/3DCRT boost
– IMRT
• Late toxicities were high
• Local control better with SRS>IMRT>EBRT+BT
Role of brachytherapy
• Intracavitary or interstitial implants
Rotterdam applicator
Role of brachytherapy
▪ Routine boost to the primary site in T1-3
lesions after EBRT
– Earlier studies – showed benefit
– Boost post CCRT showed no improvement in local
control
▪ Residual disease
▪ Recurrrent disease
Role of SRT
▪ SRT boost 7 to 12 Gy foll 66 Gy by EBRT
- Excellent LC of 98% included T1-4
▪ Persistent disease
▪ Recurrent disease
▪ Increased rates of distant failure
▪ Temporal lobe necrosis
▪ Retinopathy
Conclusion
• Management of NPC is of significant
importance in NE India due to high incidence
• Being a systemic disease requires concurrent
chemoradiation along with systemic
chemotherapy either as induction/adjuvant
• EBV associated and could be used for
diagnosis/followup
• Future trends employ EBV association to
develop immunotherapy, adoptive therapy,
epigenetic therapy, vaccines leading to a
better understanding of the disease
- Thank you
MANAGEMENT OF NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER

Nasopharyngeal cancer

  • 1.
    Cancer Nasopharynx Dr. AjayManickam MS.,DNB.,(ENT) Fellow, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Tata Medical Center , Kolkata
  • 2.
    Introduction ▪ Uncommon cancerin most parts of world ▪ 84400 new cases and 51,600 deaths annually ▪ Age Adjusted Rate ranges from 0.6 in US to 26.9 in Southern China ▪ Bimodal age distribution(15-25 + 50-59) ▪ Male to female 2-3:1
  • 3.
    Epidemiology Nasopharynx : Male- Thirteen north eastern registry areas had higher AAR, Nagaland PBCR being the highest . Delhi registry with an AAR of 0.7 stood at the fourteenth place. Female - Nine north eastern registry areas had higher AAR and Nagaland PBCR led the list . State Males (%) Females(%) Nagaland 19.3 10.9 Mizoram 2.8 2.3 Sikkim 3.7 NA Kolkata 0.36 0.2 Proportion among all cancers
  • 4.
    AAR per 100,000population
  • 5.
    Etiology • Distinct racialand geographical distribution • Multifactorial cause Genetic factors – Strong association with HLA Class 1 genes
  • 6.
    Etiology Environmental factor – Highconsumption of salted fish – Dimethyl nitrosamine • Formaldehyde • Tobacco smoking • Wood dust
  • 7.
    • Epstein BarrVirus (EBV) – Particularly non-keratinising type
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Local Spread Nasal cavity& PNS Orbital invasion Base of Skull, Clivus Sphenoid sinus Cavernous Sinus Lateral Parapharyngeal space Middle ear cavity Oropharynx (tonsillar pillars) C1 vertebrae
  • 11.
    Site Frequency(%) Adjacent softtissue Nasal Cavity Parapharyngeal space Pterygoid muscle Oropharyngeal wall, soft palate Prevertebral muscle 87 68 48 21 19 Bony erosion/PNS Clivus Sphenoid Pterygoid plate Petrous bone Ethmoid Maxillary antrum 41 38 27 19 6 4 Extensive/Intracranial extn Cavernous sinus Infratemporal fossa Orbit Cerebrum, meninges, cisterns Hypopharynx 16 9 4 4 2
  • 12.
    Lymph metastases • Vastavalvular lymph capillary network • 85 to 90% present with lymph nodes • Bilaterality in 50% • Two lymph collectors – lateral and posterior
  • 13.
    Distant metastases • 3to 6 % at presentation • 18 to 50% in the course of disease
  • 14.
    Clinical presentation • Neckmass • Nasopharyngeal mass symptoms(nasal obstruction, epistaxis, discharge) • Nerve deficits
  • 15.
    Workup • Proper historyand clinical examination – Head and neck examination – Complete CNS examination – Mirror examination • Routine – Laboratory studies – Chest Radiograph(PA+lateral)
  • 16.
    Diagnostic workup • Biopsy (directvisualisation/Fiberoptic endoscopy/exmn anaesthesia) • FNAC of neck mass • Absence of visible mass – Pharyngeal recess(Fossa of Rosenmuller) on each of the lateral wall – Supero posterior wall • IgG anti-EA and IgA anti-VCA • Baseline EBV DNA levels
  • 17.
    • Staging workup •Locoregional extent – MRI>CT
  • 18.
    Metastatic workup -if clinically indicated • PET • CT Chest and Abdomen • Bone Scan
  • 19.
    STAGING SYSTEMS • AJCC •UICC • Ho(1978) • Fletcher(1967)
  • 20.
    Ho staging system T-stage T1Confined to nasopharynx T2 Nasal fossa, oropharynx, parapharynx, muscle/ nerves below base of Skull T3 a. Bone below base of Skull b. Bone at base of skull c. Cranial nerve d. Orbit, infratemporal fossa, laryngopharynx
  • 21.
    Ho Staging -Lymphnode N-stage N0 None N1 Upper neck N2 Mid neck N3 Supraclavicular fossa Group I T1N0M0 II T2N0–1M0, T1N1M0 III T3N0-2M0, T1-2N2M0 IV T1-3N3M0 V T1-4N0-3M1
  • 22.
    AJCC/UICC 2010 7Th Tcategory TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed T0 No evidence of primary tumor Tis Carcinoma in situ T1 Tumor confined to the nasopharynx, or tumor extends to nasal cavity and/or oropharynxb without parapharyngeal extensionc T2 Tumor with parapharyngeal extension T3 Tumor involves bony structures of skull base and/or paranasal sinuses T4 Tumor with intracranial extension and/or involvement of cranial nerves, hypopharynx, orbit, or with extension to the infratemporal fossa/masticator space N category NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed N0 No regional lymph node metastasis N1 Unilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossa, and/or unilateral or bilateral retropharyngeal lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest dimension N2 Bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), ≤6 cm in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossae,f N3 Metastasis in lymph node(s)e >6 cm and/or to supraclavicular fossaf N3a. >6 cm in dimension N3b. Extension to the supraclavicular fossaf
  • 23.
    Pathological classification WHO 2005 1.Keratinising squamous cell carcinoma
  • 24.
    2. Non - keratinising squamouscell carcinoma a – Differentiated b - Undifferentiated
  • 25.
    3. Basaloid squamouscell carcinoma
  • 26.
    • Rare histologies –Lymphoma 5% – Adenocarcinoma – Plasmocytoma – Melanoma – Sarcoma
  • 27.
    Prognostic factors • Locoregionalextent of disease – T stage – N stage – Parapharyngeal extension – Prevertebral space involvement • GTV-P • Histology • Oropharynx involvement, Ethnicity – not significant
  • 28.
    Prognostic factors -contd • Role of EBV - Circulating cell free DNA – Pre-treatment assay – Response to treatment – Follow up(better than FDG PET) • Other biomarkers associated with poor prognosis - EGFR, HIF1α, CA IX, VEGF
  • 29.
    Treatment • Stage wisemanagement Radiotherapy alone • T1N0M0 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone • T1NOMO(Bulky and old T2a) • T2NOMO
  • 30.
    Treatment - contd T2-4N0-3 M0 • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 2# + CCRT • CCRT + adjuvant chemotherapy • ALSARAF – GAMECHANGER + DRAWBACK
  • 31.
    Concurrent chemotherapy • Cisplatin(30 mg/m2 weekly for 05 to 06 Cycles with RT) • Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 Day 01, 22 and 43 with RT ) • Non inferiority trial substituting CDDP with carboplatin in concurrent(weekly) and adjuvant setting showed no significant difference
  • 32.
    Induction/Sequential chemotherapy Regime (i) TIPProtocol:Paclitaxel ( 175 mg/m2 Day 01),Cisplatin (20 mg/m2 Day 01 to Day 05),Ifosfamide (1200 mg/m2 Day 01 to Day 05 ) and Mesna ( 400 mg/m2 at 0, 4, 8 hrs Day 01 to Day 05) X 2 Cycles Regime (ii) DCF Protocol:Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 Day 01), Cisplatin (75 mg/m2 Day 01 ) and 5-FU ( 750 mg/m2 /day continuous IV infusion through PICC Day 01 to Day 05 Total dose in 5 days 3750 mg/m2) X 2 Cycles Regime (iii) Cisplatin(33mg / m2 / day x 3 days) + Ifosfamide (2gm/m2 / day x 3 days) + Mesna rescue X 2 Cycles Regime (iv) Cisplatin(100 mg/m2 day 01 and 5 FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion through PICC Day 01 to Day 05) X 2 cycles Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 01 and 5 FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion through PICC Day 01 to Day 05) X 3 cycles
  • 33.
    Metastatic NPC ▪ Platinumbased combination chemotherapy ▪ RT to metastatic sites if clinically indicated – Cisplatin/carboplatin + Taxane – Cisplatin + 5FU – Carboplatin + cetuximab – Cisplatin + gemcitabine – Gemcitabine + Vinorelbine ▪ If CR after chemotherapy, patient should be considered for RT/CRT to npx and neck
  • 34.
    RT dose andfractionation ▪ Conventional fractionation 70 Gy given over 7 weeks 2 Gy# Mon-Fri ▪ High risk subclinical disease – 60 Gy ▪ Elective sites – 50 Gy
  • 35.
    Conventional technique SHRINKING FIELDTECHNIQUE 3 phases Phase I • RT to the primary tumor and upper neck nodes in one volume – 2 lateral fields • Lower neck by single AP field • Continued upto 40- 44Gy
  • 36.
    Phase II • RTto the primary by 2 lateral fields • Or by 2 lateral fields and a matching anterior field
  • 37.
    Phase III • Boostto the gross disease
  • 38.
    3DCRT 3DCRT • Better LCand OS Jen et al • T4 control (86% vs 47%) • Xerostomia (69.2% vs 98%) • No significant improvement in late toxicities
  • 39.
    IMRT • Supplanted conventionaltechnique Typical plans • 70 Gy to Gross disease • 59.4 Gy to high risk subclinical disease • 54 Gy to low risk • TMC – 66 Gy in 30 # • <42 days - Tumour Repopulation
  • 40.
    IMRT - contd •Acceleration using dose painting/ SMART • Boost for persistent disease • Recurrent disease
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Sequelae to RT Temporallobe necrosis • Late complication • Classical symptoms - hallucinations, absence attacks, déjà vu • Other symptoms – headache, confusion, convulsions, hemipareisis • Accounts for up to 65% of radiation related deaths • 1-3% with conventional RT • 12% with hypofractionated IMRT
  • 43.
    Sequelae - contd Cranialneuropathy • Nerves IX to XII • Slurring of speech, dysphagia, twitching of neck muscles • Radiation induced fibrsosis • Parapharyngeal boost • Rarely nerve VI, V also
  • 44.
    Sequelae - contd Xerostomia •Accompanied by dental sequelae • Lower rates with IMRT Aural toxicity • Cisplatin based chemotherpay • SNHL with mean cohclear dose > 48 Gy • Pharyngotympanic tube damage
  • 45.
    Sequelae - contd Endocrinedysfunction • Hyperprolactinemia • Hypothyroidism • Hypoadrenalism Second malignancy • Maxillary osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma • Surgery – only chance of cure
  • 46.
    Follow up History andphysical examination – 1 to 3 months the first year after treatment – 2 to 6 months the second year – 4 to 8 months 3 to 5 years – Every year thereafter With ✓ Imaging every 6 months ✓ Thyroid function testing every 6 to 12 months ✓ Speech and swallowing evaluation. ✓ Post treatment plasma EBV DNA surveillance if facilities available
  • 47.
    • Cranial nervepalsies 6 months post Rx – The complete recovery rate was 51% – Partial recovery rate was 19% – Worst for 7, 12th CN – Best for 2, 9, 11th CN
  • 48.
    • Patient usuallyassessed after 6 weeks • Residual disease after 8 weeks – persistent • Persistent disease – boost – Brachytherapy – IMRT – SRT – EBRT
  • 49.
    • Persistent nodaldisease – Electron boost – Neck dissection
  • 50.
    Results of treatment •5 yr local control rate with conventional radiation T1 – 76 to 90% N0 – 82 to 100% T2 – 75 to 85% N1 – 70 to 92% T3 – 60 to 70% N2 – 42 to 70% T4 – 40 to 60% N3 – 32 to 52% • 5 yr distant metastases rates – 10, 20, 30, 50% for T1,2,3,4 respectively
  • 51.
    Salvage irradiation • Localrelapse at a median period of 3 years post RT • Reirradiation requires atleast 60 Gy – 2D EBRT ± brachytherapy boost/3DCRT boost – IMRT • Late toxicities were high • Local control better with SRS>IMRT>EBRT+BT
  • 52.
    Role of brachytherapy •Intracavitary or interstitial implants Rotterdam applicator
  • 53.
    Role of brachytherapy ▪Routine boost to the primary site in T1-3 lesions after EBRT – Earlier studies – showed benefit – Boost post CCRT showed no improvement in local control ▪ Residual disease ▪ Recurrrent disease
  • 54.
    Role of SRT ▪SRT boost 7 to 12 Gy foll 66 Gy by EBRT - Excellent LC of 98% included T1-4 ▪ Persistent disease ▪ Recurrent disease ▪ Increased rates of distant failure ▪ Temporal lobe necrosis ▪ Retinopathy
  • 55.
    Conclusion • Management ofNPC is of significant importance in NE India due to high incidence • Being a systemic disease requires concurrent chemoradiation along with systemic chemotherapy either as induction/adjuvant • EBV associated and could be used for diagnosis/followup • Future trends employ EBV association to develop immunotherapy, adoptive therapy, epigenetic therapy, vaccines leading to a better understanding of the disease
  • 56.
    - Thank you MANAGEMENTOF NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER