Carcinoma
Nasopharynx
Moderator- Dr. Piyush Kumar
Presenter- Dr. Rashmi
Detection In Early Stage
 Appropriate examination, imaging and biopsy of nasopharyngeal mucosa are recommended
even if mucosal surface appears normal.
 Around 70% present with neck mass
 MRI imaging is superior to PET-CT for loco-regional invasion and RPLN metastasis. It is better for
detection of early lesions.
 EBV related serological testing for screening.
Loco-Regional Extensions
Loco-Regional Extensions
Anterior
 Nasal fossa
 Pterygoid plates
 Post ethmoid and
maxillary sinus
 If advance- orbital apex
Superior and Posterior
Superiorly
 Base of skull
 Sphenoid sinus
 Clivus
 F.Lacerum
Posterior
 Prevertebral muscle
Inferior
• Oropharynx
• Tonsillar pillars
• Tonsillar fossa
If Advance-
• C1 vertebra
Lateral
• Parapharyngeal space with
invasion of levator and tensor
veil palitini
If Advance
• Pterygoid muscle
• RPLN
• Cranial nerve compression
• Carotid artery
Lymphatic Spread
 Upper jugular-94%
 Middle juular-85%
 Retropharyngeal node- 80%
 Posterior cervical -46%
 Lower jugular-19%
 Supraclavicular -17%
 Submental-17%
Role of EBV
EBV is the first oncogenic virus identified in human cancer
EBV specific Serological tests:
• Association of EBV with NPC (non keratinizing type) provides basis for
serological test
• May enhance early detection of the primary disease/ relapses, supplement TNM
staging & improve prognostication
• For diagnosis: anti -VCA & anti EA Ab are both sensitive however IgA anti- VCA has
better specificity & may serve as screening test in high-riskpatients.
• For prognosis: prognostic effects of pre & post treatment Ab titre have been
controversial due to inconsistent results in variousstudies
• Titers remained persistently high even in patients who achieved remission.
• There was no reliable cut-off value for differentiating between recurrence and
remission.
04/05/2018
EBV- <1000
29/08/2018
EBV not detected
20/02/2019
EBV not detected
• PCR based technique makes it possible to detect EBV DNAlevels
• Plasma EBV DNA is superior to serum anti-EBV Ab in prognostication
• Diagnosis: has high sensitivity (96%) & specificity (93%) for detecting NPC
• Levels correlated significantly with tumor load, TNM staging, recurrence rate,
and survival.
• Prognosis: study by Leung et al on 376 NPC pts. showed pretherapy DNA load was
an independent prognostic factor for OS
• Risk grouping: identify poor-risk among early-stage pts. & can complement TNM
staging and guide treatment decision.
Plasma Epstein Virus DNA Levels
CLINICAL FEATURES
Symptoms
Syndromes
Horner syndrome
Ptosis
Anhidrosis
Miosis
TROTTER’S TRIAD
Hearing
loss
Palatal
palsy
Facial
pain
Cranial Nerve Involvement
•Petro-sphenoidal syndrome (CN III-IV, VI):Oculomotor
signs/symptoms
•Villaret/ Retro-parotidian syndrome (CN IV-XII):
Enophthalmos, ptosis, miosis
Diagnostic Work-Up
STAGING
AJCC
TheAJCC 7th system
(T0)
• No evidence of primary
tumor
(T1)
• Tumor confined to the
nasopharynx, or tumor
extends to oropharynx
and/or nasal cavity
without parapharyngeal
extension.
TheAJCC 8th system
(T0)
• No tumor identified,
but EBV-positive
cervical node(s)
involvement
(T1)
• Tumor confined to
nasopharynx, or
extension to
oropharynx and/or
nasal cavity without
parapharyngeal
involvement
The AJCC 7th system
T2
• Tumor with
parapharyngeal
extension*
T3
• Tumor involves bony
structures of skull base
and/or paranasal
sinuses
The AJCC 8th system
T2
• Tumor with extension to
parapharyngeal space,
and/or adjacent soft
tissue involvement
(medial pterygoid,
lateral pterygoid,
prevertebral muscles)
T3
• Tumor with infiltration of
bony structures at skull
base, cervical vertebra,
pterygoid structures,
and/or paranasal
sinuses
The AJCC 7th system
T4
The AJCC 8th system
T4
• Tumor with
intracranial
extension and/or
involvement of
cranial nerves,
hypopharynx, orbit,
or with extension to
the infratemporal
fossa/masticator
space
• Tumor with intracranial
extension,
involvement of cranial
nerves, hypopharynx,
orbit, parotid gland,
and/or extensive soft
tissue infiltration
beyond the lateral
surface of the lateral
pterygoid muscle
The AJCC 8th system
N1
• Unilateral metastasis in cervical
lymph node(s) and/or unilateral
or bilateral metastasis in
retropharyngeal lymph node(s),
6 cm or smaller in greatest
dimension, above the caudal
border of cricoid cartilage
N2
• Bilateral metastasis in cervical
lymph node(s), 6 cm or smaller
in greatest dimension, above
the caudal border of cricoid
cartilage
• The AJCC 7th system
• N1
• Unilateral metastasis in cervical
lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in
greatest dimension, above the
supraclavicular fossa, and/or
unilateral or bilateral,
retropharyngeal lymph nodes, 6
cm or less, in greatest dimension*
• N2
• Bilateral metastasis in cervical
lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in
greatest dimension, above
the supraclavicular fossa*
The AJCC 8th system
N3
• Unilateral or bilateral metastasis in
cervical lymph node(s), larger than 6
cm in greatest dimension, and/or
extension below the caudal border
of cricoid cartilage
The AJCC 7th system
N3a
• Greater than 6 cm in dimension
N3b
• Extension to the supraclavicular
fossa
Stage grouping
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0
Stage I T1 N0
M0
Stage II T2 T1,T2 N0
N1
Stage III T3 T1,T2 N0-N2 N2
Stage IV A
T4 N0,N1,N2
Any T N3
Stage IV B Any T Any N M1
Changes from 7th edition: TNM stage
change
The previous Sub-Stages IV-A(T4N0- 2M0)
and IV-B (any T N3 M0) are now merged to
form IV-A.
The previous IV-C (any T any N M1) is
now upstaged to IVB.
Pathological classification
• Carcinoma 80-90%
• Lymphomas 5%
Who classification
1. Keratinising SCC
2. Non keratinising SCC
3. Basaloid SCC
• 5 year survival is ~ 65% for nonkeratinizing
differentiated and undifferentiated subtypes
• Keratinizing type has a poorer outcome, with frequent
nodal metastasis and high mortality
Treatment
RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUES
 Conventional technique.
 Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.
 Intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
 Image-guided radiotherapy.
Two Field Technique
• Clinical field markings:
• Superior border:
• 2.5 cm above the zygomatic arch
• 5 cm above the zygomatic arch in case of intracranial extension
• Anterior border:
• 2 cm beyond the anterior most extent of the disease (usually placed just
along the lateral canthus of the eye)
• Posterior border:
• Along the tip of the mastoid or behind the posterior most
extent of cervical lymphadenopathy
• Inferior border:
• Along the superior border of the clavicle
Two Field Technique
• Radiological boundaries:
• Superior border:
• Splitting the pituitary fossa and extending along the superior
surface of the sphenoid sinus
• In case of IC extension to include at least 1 cm above the pituitary
fossa.
• Anterior border:
• At least 2 cm of the nasal cavity and maxillary antrum.
• At least 2 cm margin to the gross tumor extent
• Posterior border:
• Kept open if gross cervical Lymphadenopathy
• Else match with tips of spinous processes of the cervical vertebrae.
Treatment volume
1. The Nasopharynx.
2. Posterior 2 cm of nasal cavity.
3. Posterior ethmoid sinuses.
4. Entire sphenoid sinus and the basiocciput
5. Cavernous sinus.
6. Base of skull, including the foramen ovale, carotid canal and foramen spinosum.
7. Pterygoid fossae
8. Posterior 1/3rd of maxillary sinus.
9. Lateral and posterior oropharyngeal wall to the level of mid-tonsillar fossa.
10.? Posterior 1/4th of orbit ( Fletcher – YES, Perez - NO )
Nodal volumes
• The entire neck is at high risk for microscopic spread of disease.
• The neck nodes that should be treated are:
 Upper deep jugular
 Submandibular
 Jugulodigastric
 Midjugular
 Posterior cervical
 Retropharyngeal
Treatment planning
• Positioning:
• Supine position.
• Head should be extended
• Immobilization
• To ensure accuracy in setup patient should be
immobilized with a custom-made thermoplastic cast.
• Localization:
• All nodes are delineated with the use of radio – opaque lead wires.
• The outer canthus the eye opposite to which simulation film is taken is
marked with a lead wire.
• Tumor localization performed with the help of CT and clinical details.
Portal Selection
• For Initial Phase:
• Two parallel opposing fields
• Three field approach
• For the boost phase:
• Fletcher’s Technique ( 4 fields – antral boost)
• Anterolateral wedge pair technique
• Ho’s technique ( with separate parapharyngeal boost)
Techniques
• Energy selection:
• Co60 : 1.25 MeV
• LINAC : 4 – 6 MV
• Higher-energies used in certain Western centers during the boost
phase to:
• Reduce dose to the mandible, temporomandibular joints, ears
and subcutaneous tissue (lateral edge effect)
• Kutcher and associates however warn that use of these high
energy beams may be associated with underdosage near the
surface and near the paranasal sinus cavities.
Three Field Technique
• The superior, anterior and posterior boundaries are kept as same.
• Inferior boundary restricted to the level of the thyroid notch
unless cervical Lymphadenopathy is present
• In latter case matching done more inferiorly.
• Dose prescription done usually at 3 cm depth.
• Several measures need to be taken to circumvent the problem of
field matching
Field Matching
• Without asymmetrical jaws:
• Using laryngeal block:
• A laryngeal block is placed at the level of thelarynx.
• The block has a thickness such that it is located 1cm medial to the lateral border of thyroid
cartilage
• The block extends from the superior border of the lower field to 2 cm below the level of the
cricoid cartilages.
• Using collimator tilt:
• A collimator rotation may be given for the lateral fields to counteract the divergence of the lower
anterior field – 5° for Co 60.
• May increase the dose to the supero-anterior portion of the field where the eyes are located
• With asymmetrical jaws:
• Using an isocentric technique with half beam block for 3 fields overdosage at the field junction
can be avoided.
• Alternative is to use half beam block in the lower anterior fieldonly and use a small shield of 1 – 2
cm in midline to shield the spinal cord.
Doses Prescribed
• 40 – 44 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction over 20 – 22 fractions (4 – 4½
weeks) for the entire field.
• Rest of the dose ( 20 – 26 Gy) to delivered with spine
shielding:
• Lateral fields:
• Posterior border drawn along the junction of the posterior 1/3rd and
the anterior 2/3rd of the vertebral bodies ( Co60).
• In LINACs the posterior edge of the vertebrae may be choosen.
• Clinically marked straight along the lobule of ear.
• Anterior fields:
• 2 cm wide midline shield is adequate.
Boosting neck nodes
• Photons only:
• Antero-posterior glancing fields ( ± wedges) – Medial border is 2 cm
from midline.
• Additional boost radiation may be delivered by posterior fields to
increase the dose to the posterior cervical nodes after the course of RT
is completed.
• Electrons:
• Direct abutting lateral fields used.
• Energy selected 9 MeV
• Prescribed at 85% isodose ( Usually 3 cm depth)
• 6 x 6 cm usually adequate
• Treated at extended SSD of 110 cm
Field Marking
•The boundaries for the anterior facial fields are:
• Superiorly – below the eyeball
• Medially – 1 cm in either side of midline
• Inferiorly – upto the commissure of lips
• Laterally – Usually a distance of 6 cm – allow beam fall-off.
4 Field Technique
Ho’s technique: Planning
• Patient is immobilized in FLEXED head position in the initial
phase.
• Similar to the planning technique for pituitary.
• Allows easier shielding of the brainstem and the oral cavity and
reduces the field size requirements.
• Dose: 40 Gy in 20 #
Ho’s technique: Planning
• Three field arrangement:
• Opposed lateral fields irradiate the
upper cervical lymphatics ( upto
level III) en bloc.
• An anterior field irradiates the
lower field.
• Shielding of the lateral fields is
done to adjust for the beam
overlap with the anterior field.
• In the lower anterior field a midline
shield is placed throughout the
treatment.
0.5 cm above the anterior
clinoid process
Bisecting the
maxillary
antrum
Below vocal cords C6
Ho’s technique: Planning
• Specialized arrangement of shielding is done for all
patients.
• Brain Stem: Shielded with 5 HVL block placed in a
manner such that it is 0.5 cm behind the upper
edge of the clivus and 1 cm below the lower edge.
• Eye: 5 HVL shield placed 1.5 cm behind the lateral
canthus.
• Posterior tongue also shielded with standard
block.
• Pituitary and temporal lobes: upper half of the
pituitary fossa shielded.
Ho’s technique: Planning
• In the boost phase a 3 field arrangement was used.
• Patient was replanned in the EXTENDED head position
with oral stent.
• Anterior cervico-facial field was used in all patients
• Lower border of the later fields reduced down to level of
angle of mandible.
• Allowed dose reduction to: TM joints,
ear, parotids & pinnae.
• Dose prescribed: 22.5 Gy in 9 #
• Total tumor dose was 62.5 Gy in 29#
• Biologically equivalent to 66 Gy in 33#
Ho’s technique: Planning
• In patients with parapharyngeal disease a
posterior oblique boost was given after the
2nd phase.
• Dose prescribed was 20 Gy /10#
• This field was usually 5.5 cm x 8 cm in size.
• Ascending ramus of the mandible was
shielded in this phase.
Target Volumes
• ■ GTV/PTV: as per general principles. MRI fusion can delineate intracranial OARs, locate tumor infiltration, and
visualize nerves that need to be included.
• ■ CTV1 = GTV + 5 mm
• ■ CTV2 (per RTOG 0615) =
1) The entire nasopharynx,
2) Anterior one-half to two-thirds of the clivus (entire clivus, if involved),
3) Skull base (foramen ovale and rotundum bilaterally must be included for all cases),
4) Pterygoid fossae,
5) Parapharyngeal space,
6) Inferior sphenoid sinus (in T3–T4 disease, the entire sphenoid sinus), and
7) Posterior third to half of the nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses (to ensure pterygopalatine fossae
coverage).
8) The cavernous sinus should be included in high-risk patients (t3, t4, bulky
disease involving the roof of the nasopharynx).
9) Posterior ethmoid sinuses
10)Include bilateral levels Ib to V and retropharyngeal/parapharyngeal nodes for all cases.
Benefit of IMRT for NPC
• Improve the local control especially for concave shape tumors
• Reduce the post-irradiation complications
• Reduce the rate of distant metastasis by improving the local control
• The intensity of the radiation beams can be modulated to deliver a high
dose to the tumor with a superior target volume coverage while
significantly limiting the dose to surrounding normal structures.
IMRT Planning Flowchart
Immobilization
Imaging acquisition and
contouring
CT MRI FUSION
Brachytherapy
• Intracavitary/ interstitial implants have been used inNPC
• Indications:
As a boost treatment following EBRT
 In the treatment of recurrent disease.
Brachytherapy
• The following requirements should be fulfilled prior to taking up a
patient for brachytherapy:
• Tumor thickness less than 10 mm.
• Absence of intracranial, paranasal sinus and oropharyngeal
involvement.
• Absence of involvement of underlying bone or infratemporal fossa.
• Absence of metastatic disease.
• Expertise in nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy.
“In effect, nasopharyngeal brachytherapy is ineffective in tumors
extending beyond the nasopharynx” -Xiao-Kang Zheng
Techniques
• Techniques:
• Temporary intracavitary application
• Temporary interstitial implantation
• Permanent interstitial implantation
• Dose-rates used:
• Low dose rate (LDR).
• High dose rate (HDR).
• Situations used:
• Routine use as a boost after XRT ( Hong Kong, China and Netherlands)
• Use with documented residual disease ( USA)
• Recurrence ( Hong Kong, USA - Syed and Chinese Series)
Rotterdam Applicator
• Designed by Levendag.
• Designed so that the applicator could be worn by the patient
comfortably continuously throughout the fractionated course of
treatment given.
• Made up of silicone which is flexible and closely conforms to the
curvature of the nasopharynx.
• Applicator design based upon a 3 D model of the nasopharynx
(based on CT of two patients)
• Allows closer fit to the base of the skull and situated at a fixed distance
from the soft palate.
• A silicone bridge and flange used to fix the applicator against the
posterior nasal septum and the anterior one respectively.
• Tube diameter
• Outer diameter 15 F (5.5 mm)
• Inner diameter 9 F ( 3.5 mm)
• Can accommodate the 6 F HDR source
easily.
• Two tubes ensure catheter
stability.
• The tubes are diverging at the base
Rotterdam Applicator
Dose Prescribed
• In case EBRT given in dose of 60 Gy:
• 3 Gy x 2 fractions per day for 6 fractions by HDR
• Total dose ~ 78 Gy
• Minimum interfraction gap of 6 hrs.
• In case of EBRT given in dose of 70 Gy:
• 3 Gy x 2 fractions for 4 fractions by HDR
• Total dose ~ 82 Gy
• Minimum interfraction gap of 6 hrs.
Advantages
• Comfortable applicator – can be kept between fractions
• Optimization possible – Na, BOS and the R points.
• Can be reused after steam sterilization.
• Reduced normal tissue dose – to the retina, palate and the nasal cavity
• In earlier work Levendag used to use two other points:
• FL point:
• corresponding to the BOS point
• Approximates the position of the foramen lacerum
• FO point:
• Situated at the foramen ovale
• Taken 2 cm lateral to the midline in then same plane as the BOS
point.
Disadvantages
• Nasal synechia have been observed in few patients.
• Corresponds to the hyperdose sleeve of 200% isodose around
the applicator.
• Approximately occurs in a radius of 6 mm around the source
axis after standard prescription
• Reduced by use of nasal pack for 7 days after ICBT
• Optimization can result in increased dose to some points
(especially the spinal point).
275 patients with loco regionally advanced NPC disease (TNM stages III or M0
stage IV)
treated by induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy to
70 Gy conventional planning
NACT :cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 3
weeks for 2 cycles followed by EBRT 70 Gy to primary & positive nodes & 46 Gy to
negative neck and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 /week for 7 weeks
boost of 11-Gy LDR or three fractions of
3-Gy HDR.
then randomized into 2 arms
Arm A:standard arm
ArmB:brachytherapy boost arm:
• In T1–3 disease as a boost treatment following external beam
irradiation, and improves local control
• Boost dose of 10–12 Gy in 2 fractions separated by a week.
Role Of Surgery
• Due to deep location of nasopharynx, and anatomic proximity to critical
structures, radical surgery is typically not used
• Limited to
Biopsy for histological confirmation
Neck dissections for persistently enlarged lymph nodes
Nasopharyngectomy in persistent or recurrent disease
CHEMOTHERAPY
 Concurrent Chemo radiotherapy
 Neoadjuvant/induction Chemotherapy
 Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
 Chemotherapy is believed to act as radiosensitizer.
 It helps to reduce the chance of distant metastasis.
 For locally advanced disease (stage III-IV ) chemotherapy
in addition to radiotherapy appears to improve overall results.
 Combination chemotherapy produces better responses
 combination cisplatin/5-flurouracil is the most widely used
 Indicates that concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a major role in
advanced stage NPC
Follow up
• Complete H&N physical exam
• Mirror/fiberoptic exam
• Q1-3 months for year 1
• Q2-6 months for year 2
• Q4-8 months for years 3 – 5
• Yearly for years > 5
• Imaging for signs/symptoms
• TSH yearly (if neck irradiated)
• Speech/swallowing/dental/hearing evaluations
• Consider EBV-DNA monitoring
Thank You

Carcinoma nasopharynx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Detection In EarlyStage  Appropriate examination, imaging and biopsy of nasopharyngeal mucosa are recommended even if mucosal surface appears normal.  Around 70% present with neck mass  MRI imaging is superior to PET-CT for loco-regional invasion and RPLN metastasis. It is better for detection of early lesions.  EBV related serological testing for screening.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Anterior  Nasal fossa Pterygoid plates  Post ethmoid and maxillary sinus  If advance- orbital apex
  • 6.
    Superior and Posterior Superiorly Base of skull  Sphenoid sinus  Clivus  F.Lacerum Posterior  Prevertebral muscle
  • 7.
    Inferior • Oropharynx • Tonsillarpillars • Tonsillar fossa If Advance- • C1 vertebra
  • 8.
    Lateral • Parapharyngeal spacewith invasion of levator and tensor veil palitini If Advance • Pterygoid muscle • RPLN • Cranial nerve compression • Carotid artery
  • 9.
  • 10.
     Upper jugular-94% Middle juular-85%  Retropharyngeal node- 80%  Posterior cervical -46%  Lower jugular-19%  Supraclavicular -17%  Submental-17%
  • 11.
    Role of EBV EBVis the first oncogenic virus identified in human cancer
  • 14.
    EBV specific Serologicaltests: • Association of EBV with NPC (non keratinizing type) provides basis for serological test • May enhance early detection of the primary disease/ relapses, supplement TNM staging & improve prognostication • For diagnosis: anti -VCA & anti EA Ab are both sensitive however IgA anti- VCA has better specificity & may serve as screening test in high-riskpatients. • For prognosis: prognostic effects of pre & post treatment Ab titre have been controversial due to inconsistent results in variousstudies • Titers remained persistently high even in patients who achieved remission. • There was no reliable cut-off value for differentiating between recurrence and remission.
  • 15.
    04/05/2018 EBV- <1000 29/08/2018 EBV notdetected 20/02/2019 EBV not detected
  • 16.
    • PCR basedtechnique makes it possible to detect EBV DNAlevels • Plasma EBV DNA is superior to serum anti-EBV Ab in prognostication • Diagnosis: has high sensitivity (96%) & specificity (93%) for detecting NPC • Levels correlated significantly with tumor load, TNM staging, recurrence rate, and survival. • Prognosis: study by Leung et al on 376 NPC pts. showed pretherapy DNA load was an independent prognostic factor for OS • Risk grouping: identify poor-risk among early-stage pts. & can complement TNM staging and guide treatment decision. Plasma Epstein Virus DNA Levels
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Cranial Nerve Involvement •Petro-sphenoidalsyndrome (CN III-IV, VI):Oculomotor signs/symptoms •Villaret/ Retro-parotidian syndrome (CN IV-XII): Enophthalmos, ptosis, miosis
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    AJCC TheAJCC 7th system (T0) •No evidence of primary tumor (T1) • Tumor confined to the nasopharynx, or tumor extends to oropharynx and/or nasal cavity without parapharyngeal extension. TheAJCC 8th system (T0) • No tumor identified, but EBV-positive cervical node(s) involvement (T1) • Tumor confined to nasopharynx, or extension to oropharynx and/or nasal cavity without parapharyngeal involvement
  • 26.
    The AJCC 7thsystem T2 • Tumor with parapharyngeal extension* T3 • Tumor involves bony structures of skull base and/or paranasal sinuses The AJCC 8th system T2 • Tumor with extension to parapharyngeal space, and/or adjacent soft tissue involvement (medial pterygoid, lateral pterygoid, prevertebral muscles) T3 • Tumor with infiltration of bony structures at skull base, cervical vertebra, pterygoid structures, and/or paranasal sinuses
  • 27.
    The AJCC 7thsystem T4 The AJCC 8th system T4 • Tumor with intracranial extension and/or involvement of cranial nerves, hypopharynx, orbit, or with extension to the infratemporal fossa/masticator space • Tumor with intracranial extension, involvement of cranial nerves, hypopharynx, orbit, parotid gland, and/or extensive soft tissue infiltration beyond the lateral surface of the lateral pterygoid muscle
  • 28.
    The AJCC 8thsystem N1 • Unilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s) and/or unilateral or bilateral metastasis in retropharyngeal lymph node(s), 6 cm or smaller in greatest dimension, above the caudal border of cricoid cartilage N2 • Bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), 6 cm or smaller in greatest dimension, above the caudal border of cricoid cartilage • The AJCC 7th system • N1 • Unilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossa, and/or unilateral or bilateral, retropharyngeal lymph nodes, 6 cm or less, in greatest dimension* • N2 • Bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), 6 cm or less in greatest dimension, above the supraclavicular fossa*
  • 29.
    The AJCC 8thsystem N3 • Unilateral or bilateral metastasis in cervical lymph node(s), larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension, and/or extension below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage The AJCC 7th system N3a • Greater than 6 cm in dimension N3b • Extension to the supraclavicular fossa
  • 30.
    Stage grouping Stage 0Tis N0 M0 Stage I T1 N0 M0 Stage II T2 T1,T2 N0 N1 Stage III T3 T1,T2 N0-N2 N2 Stage IV A T4 N0,N1,N2 Any T N3 Stage IV B Any T Any N M1 Changes from 7th edition: TNM stage change The previous Sub-Stages IV-A(T4N0- 2M0) and IV-B (any T N3 M0) are now merged to form IV-A. The previous IV-C (any T any N M1) is now upstaged to IVB.
  • 32.
    Pathological classification • Carcinoma80-90% • Lymphomas 5% Who classification 1. Keratinising SCC 2. Non keratinising SCC 3. Basaloid SCC • 5 year survival is ~ 65% for nonkeratinizing differentiated and undifferentiated subtypes • Keratinizing type has a poorer outcome, with frequent nodal metastasis and high mortality
  • 33.
  • 34.
    RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUES  Conventionaltechnique.  Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy.  Image-guided radiotherapy.
  • 35.
    Two Field Technique •Clinical field markings: • Superior border: • 2.5 cm above the zygomatic arch • 5 cm above the zygomatic arch in case of intracranial extension • Anterior border: • 2 cm beyond the anterior most extent of the disease (usually placed just along the lateral canthus of the eye) • Posterior border: • Along the tip of the mastoid or behind the posterior most extent of cervical lymphadenopathy • Inferior border: • Along the superior border of the clavicle
  • 36.
    Two Field Technique •Radiological boundaries: • Superior border: • Splitting the pituitary fossa and extending along the superior surface of the sphenoid sinus • In case of IC extension to include at least 1 cm above the pituitary fossa. • Anterior border: • At least 2 cm of the nasal cavity and maxillary antrum. • At least 2 cm margin to the gross tumor extent • Posterior border: • Kept open if gross cervical Lymphadenopathy • Else match with tips of spinous processes of the cervical vertebrae.
  • 38.
    Treatment volume 1. TheNasopharynx. 2. Posterior 2 cm of nasal cavity. 3. Posterior ethmoid sinuses. 4. Entire sphenoid sinus and the basiocciput 5. Cavernous sinus. 6. Base of skull, including the foramen ovale, carotid canal and foramen spinosum. 7. Pterygoid fossae 8. Posterior 1/3rd of maxillary sinus. 9. Lateral and posterior oropharyngeal wall to the level of mid-tonsillar fossa. 10.? Posterior 1/4th of orbit ( Fletcher – YES, Perez - NO )
  • 39.
    Nodal volumes • Theentire neck is at high risk for microscopic spread of disease. • The neck nodes that should be treated are:  Upper deep jugular  Submandibular  Jugulodigastric  Midjugular  Posterior cervical  Retropharyngeal
  • 40.
    Treatment planning • Positioning: •Supine position. • Head should be extended • Immobilization • To ensure accuracy in setup patient should be immobilized with a custom-made thermoplastic cast. • Localization: • All nodes are delineated with the use of radio – opaque lead wires. • The outer canthus the eye opposite to which simulation film is taken is marked with a lead wire. • Tumor localization performed with the help of CT and clinical details.
  • 41.
    Portal Selection • ForInitial Phase: • Two parallel opposing fields • Three field approach • For the boost phase: • Fletcher’s Technique ( 4 fields – antral boost) • Anterolateral wedge pair technique • Ho’s technique ( with separate parapharyngeal boost)
  • 42.
    Techniques • Energy selection: •Co60 : 1.25 MeV • LINAC : 4 – 6 MV • Higher-energies used in certain Western centers during the boost phase to: • Reduce dose to the mandible, temporomandibular joints, ears and subcutaneous tissue (lateral edge effect) • Kutcher and associates however warn that use of these high energy beams may be associated with underdosage near the surface and near the paranasal sinus cavities.
  • 43.
    Three Field Technique •The superior, anterior and posterior boundaries are kept as same. • Inferior boundary restricted to the level of the thyroid notch unless cervical Lymphadenopathy is present • In latter case matching done more inferiorly. • Dose prescription done usually at 3 cm depth. • Several measures need to be taken to circumvent the problem of field matching
  • 44.
    Field Matching • Withoutasymmetrical jaws: • Using laryngeal block: • A laryngeal block is placed at the level of thelarynx. • The block has a thickness such that it is located 1cm medial to the lateral border of thyroid cartilage • The block extends from the superior border of the lower field to 2 cm below the level of the cricoid cartilages. • Using collimator tilt: • A collimator rotation may be given for the lateral fields to counteract the divergence of the lower anterior field – 5° for Co 60. • May increase the dose to the supero-anterior portion of the field where the eyes are located • With asymmetrical jaws: • Using an isocentric technique with half beam block for 3 fields overdosage at the field junction can be avoided. • Alternative is to use half beam block in the lower anterior fieldonly and use a small shield of 1 – 2 cm in midline to shield the spinal cord.
  • 45.
    Doses Prescribed • 40– 44 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction over 20 – 22 fractions (4 – 4½ weeks) for the entire field. • Rest of the dose ( 20 – 26 Gy) to delivered with spine shielding: • Lateral fields: • Posterior border drawn along the junction of the posterior 1/3rd and the anterior 2/3rd of the vertebral bodies ( Co60). • In LINACs the posterior edge of the vertebrae may be choosen. • Clinically marked straight along the lobule of ear. • Anterior fields: • 2 cm wide midline shield is adequate.
  • 46.
    Boosting neck nodes •Photons only: • Antero-posterior glancing fields ( ± wedges) – Medial border is 2 cm from midline. • Additional boost radiation may be delivered by posterior fields to increase the dose to the posterior cervical nodes after the course of RT is completed. • Electrons: • Direct abutting lateral fields used. • Energy selected 9 MeV • Prescribed at 85% isodose ( Usually 3 cm depth) • 6 x 6 cm usually adequate • Treated at extended SSD of 110 cm
  • 47.
    Field Marking •The boundariesfor the anterior facial fields are: • Superiorly – below the eyeball • Medially – 1 cm in either side of midline • Inferiorly – upto the commissure of lips • Laterally – Usually a distance of 6 cm – allow beam fall-off.
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Ho’s technique: Planning •Patient is immobilized in FLEXED head position in the initial phase. • Similar to the planning technique for pituitary. • Allows easier shielding of the brainstem and the oral cavity and reduces the field size requirements. • Dose: 40 Gy in 20 #
  • 50.
    Ho’s technique: Planning •Three field arrangement: • Opposed lateral fields irradiate the upper cervical lymphatics ( upto level III) en bloc. • An anterior field irradiates the lower field. • Shielding of the lateral fields is done to adjust for the beam overlap with the anterior field. • In the lower anterior field a midline shield is placed throughout the treatment. 0.5 cm above the anterior clinoid process Bisecting the maxillary antrum Below vocal cords C6
  • 51.
    Ho’s technique: Planning •Specialized arrangement of shielding is done for all patients. • Brain Stem: Shielded with 5 HVL block placed in a manner such that it is 0.5 cm behind the upper edge of the clivus and 1 cm below the lower edge. • Eye: 5 HVL shield placed 1.5 cm behind the lateral canthus. • Posterior tongue also shielded with standard block. • Pituitary and temporal lobes: upper half of the pituitary fossa shielded.
  • 52.
    Ho’s technique: Planning •In the boost phase a 3 field arrangement was used. • Patient was replanned in the EXTENDED head position with oral stent. • Anterior cervico-facial field was used in all patients • Lower border of the later fields reduced down to level of angle of mandible. • Allowed dose reduction to: TM joints, ear, parotids & pinnae. • Dose prescribed: 22.5 Gy in 9 # • Total tumor dose was 62.5 Gy in 29# • Biologically equivalent to 66 Gy in 33#
  • 53.
    Ho’s technique: Planning •In patients with parapharyngeal disease a posterior oblique boost was given after the 2nd phase. • Dose prescribed was 20 Gy /10# • This field was usually 5.5 cm x 8 cm in size. • Ascending ramus of the mandible was shielded in this phase.
  • 54.
    Target Volumes • ■GTV/PTV: as per general principles. MRI fusion can delineate intracranial OARs, locate tumor infiltration, and visualize nerves that need to be included. • ■ CTV1 = GTV + 5 mm • ■ CTV2 (per RTOG 0615) = 1) The entire nasopharynx, 2) Anterior one-half to two-thirds of the clivus (entire clivus, if involved), 3) Skull base (foramen ovale and rotundum bilaterally must be included for all cases), 4) Pterygoid fossae, 5) Parapharyngeal space, 6) Inferior sphenoid sinus (in T3–T4 disease, the entire sphenoid sinus), and 7) Posterior third to half of the nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses (to ensure pterygopalatine fossae coverage). 8) The cavernous sinus should be included in high-risk patients (t3, t4, bulky disease involving the roof of the nasopharynx). 9) Posterior ethmoid sinuses 10)Include bilateral levels Ib to V and retropharyngeal/parapharyngeal nodes for all cases.
  • 55.
    Benefit of IMRTfor NPC • Improve the local control especially for concave shape tumors • Reduce the post-irradiation complications • Reduce the rate of distant metastasis by improving the local control • The intensity of the radiation beams can be modulated to deliver a high dose to the tumor with a superior target volume coverage while significantly limiting the dose to surrounding normal structures.
  • 56.
  • 57.
  • 58.
  • 60.
    Brachytherapy • Intracavitary/ interstitialimplants have been used inNPC • Indications: As a boost treatment following EBRT  In the treatment of recurrent disease.
  • 61.
    Brachytherapy • The followingrequirements should be fulfilled prior to taking up a patient for brachytherapy: • Tumor thickness less than 10 mm. • Absence of intracranial, paranasal sinus and oropharyngeal involvement. • Absence of involvement of underlying bone or infratemporal fossa. • Absence of metastatic disease. • Expertise in nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy. “In effect, nasopharyngeal brachytherapy is ineffective in tumors extending beyond the nasopharynx” -Xiao-Kang Zheng
  • 62.
    Techniques • Techniques: • Temporaryintracavitary application • Temporary interstitial implantation • Permanent interstitial implantation • Dose-rates used: • Low dose rate (LDR). • High dose rate (HDR). • Situations used: • Routine use as a boost after XRT ( Hong Kong, China and Netherlands) • Use with documented residual disease ( USA) • Recurrence ( Hong Kong, USA - Syed and Chinese Series)
  • 63.
    Rotterdam Applicator • Designedby Levendag. • Designed so that the applicator could be worn by the patient comfortably continuously throughout the fractionated course of treatment given. • Made up of silicone which is flexible and closely conforms to the curvature of the nasopharynx. • Applicator design based upon a 3 D model of the nasopharynx (based on CT of two patients) • Allows closer fit to the base of the skull and situated at a fixed distance from the soft palate. • A silicone bridge and flange used to fix the applicator against the posterior nasal septum and the anterior one respectively.
  • 64.
    • Tube diameter •Outer diameter 15 F (5.5 mm) • Inner diameter 9 F ( 3.5 mm) • Can accommodate the 6 F HDR source easily. • Two tubes ensure catheter stability. • The tubes are diverging at the base Rotterdam Applicator
  • 65.
    Dose Prescribed • Incase EBRT given in dose of 60 Gy: • 3 Gy x 2 fractions per day for 6 fractions by HDR • Total dose ~ 78 Gy • Minimum interfraction gap of 6 hrs. • In case of EBRT given in dose of 70 Gy: • 3 Gy x 2 fractions for 4 fractions by HDR • Total dose ~ 82 Gy • Minimum interfraction gap of 6 hrs.
  • 66.
    Advantages • Comfortable applicator– can be kept between fractions • Optimization possible – Na, BOS and the R points. • Can be reused after steam sterilization. • Reduced normal tissue dose – to the retina, palate and the nasal cavity • In earlier work Levendag used to use two other points: • FL point: • corresponding to the BOS point • Approximates the position of the foramen lacerum • FO point: • Situated at the foramen ovale • Taken 2 cm lateral to the midline in then same plane as the BOS point.
  • 67.
    Disadvantages • Nasal synechiahave been observed in few patients. • Corresponds to the hyperdose sleeve of 200% isodose around the applicator. • Approximately occurs in a radius of 6 mm around the source axis after standard prescription • Reduced by use of nasal pack for 7 days after ICBT • Optimization can result in increased dose to some points (especially the spinal point).
  • 68.
    275 patients withloco regionally advanced NPC disease (TNM stages III or M0 stage IV) treated by induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 70 Gy conventional planning NACT :cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 3 weeks for 2 cycles followed by EBRT 70 Gy to primary & positive nodes & 46 Gy to negative neck and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 /week for 7 weeks boost of 11-Gy LDR or three fractions of 3-Gy HDR. then randomized into 2 arms Arm A:standard arm ArmB:brachytherapy boost arm:
  • 69.
    • In T1–3disease as a boost treatment following external beam irradiation, and improves local control • Boost dose of 10–12 Gy in 2 fractions separated by a week.
  • 71.
    Role Of Surgery •Due to deep location of nasopharynx, and anatomic proximity to critical structures, radical surgery is typically not used • Limited to Biopsy for histological confirmation Neck dissections for persistently enlarged lymph nodes Nasopharyngectomy in persistent or recurrent disease
  • 72.
    CHEMOTHERAPY  Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy  Neoadjuvant/induction Chemotherapy  Adjuvant Chemotherapy
  • 73.
    Chemotherapy  Chemotherapy isbelieved to act as radiosensitizer.  It helps to reduce the chance of distant metastasis.  For locally advanced disease (stage III-IV ) chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy appears to improve overall results.  Combination chemotherapy produces better responses  combination cisplatin/5-flurouracil is the most widely used  Indicates that concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a major role in advanced stage NPC
  • 75.
    Follow up • CompleteH&N physical exam • Mirror/fiberoptic exam • Q1-3 months for year 1 • Q2-6 months for year 2 • Q4-8 months for years 3 – 5 • Yearly for years > 5 • Imaging for signs/symptoms • TSH yearly (if neck irradiated) • Speech/swallowing/dental/hearing evaluations • Consider EBV-DNA monitoring
  • 76.