The document outlines the principles of narrative-driven game design, emphasizing the relationship between storytelling and gameplay. It explores how stories are constructed, the importance of character development, audience engagement, and the notion of emergent narratives, providing a framework for creating meaningful games. The author advocates for using universal story structures to enhance player experience and emotional engagement in games.
My Experience
Story andGame Designer (background in data analysis)
• 11 bit studios
• ATGames
• CD Projekt RED
• Lodz University of Technology
5.
Special Thanks
This talkwas inspired by
John Yorke’s book
Into the Woods
How stories work and why we tell
them
6.
Story Designer’s Dilemmas
1.How to tell stories in games?
2. How good are games for telling stories?
3. How can I use gameplay to tell stories?
4. How to design stories in games to make the best of the medium?
7.
How to useour knowledge of stories
to make better games?
Once upon atime…
there was someone living a normal live...
until it became clear that the hero is lacking something vital.
The hero went for a journey to find what was missing.
To get the treasure our hero had to face a grave and deadly danger!
The odds seemed impossible, but our hero overcame all opposition,
returned home with a prize that restored the balance.
10.
Every story hasthe same shape
Beginning
something
unexpected
Middle
something
unexpected
End
nothing
interesting
nothing
interesting
Five Act Structure
1.exposition - dramatis personae, seed of conflict
2. complications - intrigues, clash of interests
3. climax - hero at the crossroads
4. falling action - consequences, false hopes/fears
5. resolution - catastrophe and downfall / victory and transfiguration
13.
Dramatic Changes
Facade vsFlaw
Desire vs Need
Opposition vs Hero
Hero vs Opposition (tragedies)
Difficulty vs Skill
Ignorance vs Knowledge 0
20
40
60
80
Act 1 Act 2 Act 3 Act 4 Act 5
To master agame our brain has to
make sense of a new universe
21.
How to putstories into gameplay?
They are already there.
When we play, our brain creates
narratives, looks for motivations,
attributes emotions, etc.
Can we prevent it?
Kuleshov says: not really
The Fractal Natureof Stories and Games
• Story = Game
• Act = Level
• Scene = Encounter
• Beat = Second-to-second
At every level a hero faces a problem and reacts to find a solution.
25.
Two types ofa hero
Three dimensional hero
• has a true self hidden behind a mask
• desires one thing / needs the opposite
• has a flaw that can be fatal
• must confront own flaws
• discovers true self
• changes
• lasts for just one story
• deeply satisfying (when done right)
Two dimensional hero
• is transparent, needs no mask
• desire = need
• has a deficiency of knowledge
• must confront external opposition
• re-asserts true self
• stays the same
• perfect for series/sequels
• highly addictive (when done right)
26.
What makes ahero?
Imagine:
• In a bar, a woman walks up to a man who is drinking alone, and says…
• A boy who is bullied at school finds a magic lamp, and asks the djinn for...
• A man loses his family in an accident; one day he wakes up and decides…
• A huntress stands at an entrance to a cave, she sniffs the air and…
What makes a hero unique, is the decision made in a moment of crisis.
In a game that decision is usually made by the player.
Our Focus
• characterdevelopment
• audience engagement
• audience satisfaction and subverting expectations
• motivations and empathy
• dialogues and exposition
• emergent narratives
29.
Character Development
Two dimensionalapproach:
• gains experience, learns new skills
• character development = increasing knowledge
• character development ≠ true change
• power creep = jumping the shark
• requires occasional amnesia
30.
Character Development
Three dimensionalapproach:
• makes decisions, observes consequences
• character development = progress in the story
• character development ≠ increasing mastery
• player’s desire and character’s need
• may rely on a player’s decision
31.
Audience Engagement
We liketo earn our entertainment, effort increases involvement.
The “2+2=?” rule.
Gameplay (high engagement) as storytelling tool; system rhetorics.
When curiosity is your friend, fear is your enemy.
Subverting Expectations
Disturbed structure:
•parts of the character arc are missing or misplaced
• surprise and dissonance creates strong emotional response
• difficulty curve and fail/reload system as the character arc
• overused or mishandled causes frustration
34.
Motivations and Empathy
Weneed credible vibrant breathing living empathetic characters:
• do you believe in your character’s motivation?
• do you really understand what the antagonist wants and why?
• can you tell how your opponents feel, what they emotions are?
35.
Motivations and Empathy
Redflags:
• characters in cutscenes are different than in gameplay
• important decisions are made for the player, not by the player
• the only motivation in a scene comes from gameplay
36.
Dialogues and Exposition
Conversationas an action scene:
• use opposition to present a dilemma
• use the dilemma to characterize the characters
• words show the facade, choices reveal the flaw
• prepare the scene for a change or revelation
37.
Dialogues and Exposition
Makeplayers work for their entertainment:
• instead of writing “4” write “2+2=?”
• use Kuleshov Effect to make players create their own sense
• consider skipping dialogue, use system rhetorics instead
• motivations: surprises, unexpected emotions, new knowledge
38.
Emergent narratives
When wetalk about games, we talk in our personal narratives:
• event sequences are interpreted as stories
• juxtaposed events color perceived emotions and motivations
• emergent narratives are almost impossible to track
• but may be enhanced by feedback to player’s choices and states
Player's Need
Every storyneeds a theme:
• question - assumption (thesis)
• exploration - challenging assumption (antithesis)
• answer - conclusion (synthesis)
41.
Author’s Voice
The answeris not universal, it always has an author:
• designer’s answer
• player’s choice from presented designer’s answers
• player’s answer, emergent and internal
42.
The basic story/gameplaybuilding block
How does this particular gameplay mechanism make a good story?
1. discovery - the hero notices/learns something and decides to act
2. truth! - true nature of the opposition/ hero’s flaw reveals itself
3. assimilation - the hero acts on the knowledge and succeeds/fails
43.
Game-as-a-good-story checklist
• whatthe hero wants, what the opposition wants, is there a conflict?
• does the player want the same thing that the hero wants?
• where is the moment of choice, what is at stake?
• what does the hero learn, what does the player learn?
• do all actors have a reason to be in this situation, what do they want to gain?
• does the hero change or reveal some inner truth, in what way?
• does this situation end in a setup for a new scene (a cliffhanger)?
44.
Game-as-a-good-scene checklist
• whatdoes the player expect entering the scene?
• what does the player learn from interacting with the scene?
• how can the player use the new knowledge to win the scene?
45.
The Universal Quest
Everystory is about a journey,
finding of the missing part,
its retrieval
and making of something whole.
46.
The Universal Gameplay
Everygame is a conflict,
two opposites clash
opposites are assimilated
and the conflict is stilled.
47.
Learning Process
Every storyand every game is about making sense of the universe:
1. we ask a question
2. test it against the world
3. and assimilate what we’ve learned.
48.
Narrative-driven game design
Wecan use the universal story structure to create meaningful and exciting
games.
1. question - theme, motivation, why the question was asked?
2. learning - testing, growth, understanding, decisions, key knowledge
3. assimilation - consequences, feedback loops, internal stories, change
By hijacking our brain’s learning mechanisms we can create a new
game-specific language to tell engaging and emotional stories.
49.
Looking for ameaning
Every story has an author.
• system rhetorics = authorial voice
• decisions = asserting identity
• cause and effect chain = internal narratives
• fractal structure = consistency of theme and mood
• structure ≠ meaning
In the end we must have something interesting to say.