Water Reuse: Technologies for Industrial & Municipal Applications
Daniel Christodoss, Ph.D., P.E.
(Principal Municipal Engineer)
John Kovski, P.E.
(Department Manager - Engineering)
URS Corporation, Houston, TX
(713) 914-6699 |

daniel.christodoss@urs.com | john.kovski@urs.com

2013 9th Annual
Practical “WATER Issues & Technologies” Short Course
Sponsored by:
Food Protein R&D Center
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX
Outline
World Water Stress
Water Use by Industry Sector
Water Demand 2010 to 2060
Case for Reclamation (reuse)
Water Reuse Process (Food Industry)
Water Reuse Process (Oil & Gas)
Water Reuse Process (Municipal)
Water Reuse Process (Agricultural)
Diminishing Water Resources
Critical worldwide concern
Previously developing nation’s issues
Now Global Crisis
Quantity and Quality Issues
From Surplus to Limited
World Water Stress
EPA 2012
Source: Earth Forum: Houston Museum of Natural Science
TX Surface Water
3% Freshwater

Source: www.fracfocus.org & Estimated Use of Water in the United States, USGS 2005
TX Ground Water
Municipal

Source: AiChE 2011 Eastman Kodak Co.
Industrial
Mining
Manufacturing
Texas (TWDB)
“I am convinced that, under
present conditions and with the
way water is being managed, we
will run out of water long before
we run out of fuel.” – former CEO
of Nestle, Peter BrabeckLetmathe in The Economist
(2008)
Source: AiChE 2011 Eastman Kodak Co.
EPA, 2012

Process Water Recovery Treatment Plant Frito Lay, AZ
EPA, 2012
EPA, 2012
Refinery WW Reuse for Boiler Feed Water (BFW)
Source: 2012 Industrial Waste and Pretreatment Seminar, Virginia Water Env Assn.,
AECOM
Source: SAWEA 2005 Workshop, ZENON Environmental, Inc.
Membranes Dominate Industrial Water Reuse

Source: SAWEA 2005 Workshop, ZENON Environmental, Inc.
Osmotic pressure

Fresh water

Saline water

(a) direct osmosis

Semipermeable
membrane
(b) osmotic-equilibrium

(c) reverse osmosis
KBR 2005

Wastewater Recycle for Boiler Feed-Houston Ship Channel
KBR 2005

Wastewater Recycle for Boiler Feed-Houston Ship Channel
EPA, 2012
Example Resource Recovery Center
Sewage

Primary Clarifier
or Filter

Low Energy Membrane for
BOD and TSS Removal

Food waste,
misc. organics

Electricity
Methane

Nutrient
Removal and
Recovery

Anaerobic
Digester

Primary Revenue
Ultrapure water for
industry makeup
and aquifer
recharge
Peak electricity
sales to grid

Electricity
Generation
CO2

Algae Conversion
to Biodiesel

Final
Filter

Secondary Revenue
Irrigation water
Fuel savings
Inorganic fertilizer

AICHE 2011 Eastman Kodak Co
Wetlands Cell
Rainwater is
collected
from the
roof top,
stored in UG
Cisterns and
used to flush
toilets

Rainwater UG
Cistern

Drip Irrigation
Settling Equalization
tank
Tank

Trickling
Filter

EPA, 2012

Water Purification Eco-Center
North American Shale Plays
Water management is a key element in
all of the shale plays
KEY ELEMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT
is: The Water Lifecycle Development
Approach to Flowback and Produced
Water Treatment and Management
Data Collection
Concept/Feasibility Studies
Bench-/Pilot-scale Testing
Technology Screening and Identification
Lifecycle Cost Evaluation

27
North American Experience
Variations within and between
shale plays

Flowback %
Salinity /TDS Values
Formation-Derived Inputs
(e.g., Scale Formers, NORM)

Locational differences but
common treatment and disposal
scenarios

28

MULTIPLE SHALE PLAYS
Play Characteristics
Play

Barnett

Flowback %

Medium to
high (3070%)

Black Warrior
Eagle Ford
Haynesville

Salinity/
TDS Values

50,000 to 140,000
500 to 140,000
2,000 to 10,000

Low (5%)

90,000 to 200,000

Marcellus
Niobara

40,000 to 240,000
1,000 to 10,000

Permian

30,000

Piceance
Utica

29

Medium to
high

Other
Issues*

1,000 to 15,000
>100,000

BTEX, Boron, Ammonia
NORM, BTEX, Scale formers, Boron,
Ammonia
NORM, BTEX, Ammonia
NORM, BTEX, Scale formers, Boron,
Ammonia
COMPONENTS OF UNCONVENTIONAL GAS
LIFECYCLE WATER MANAGMENT
Water
Sources
Groundwater
Withdrawals
Stream
Withdrawals

Conveyance
Conveyance

Storage

Tank Truck Delivery

Portable Storage
Tanks at Well Sites

Fracture
Stimulation

Holding Ponds at
Well Sites

Well Drilling/
Construction

Pipe Delivery

Uses

Flowback/Produced
Flow Back/
Water
Brines & Brines
Potential Treatment
Skid or Facility

Well Completion
and Appurtenances
Treated Effluent
from WWTP
Public Water
Supply

Reuse
Reuse for
Development

Hydrostatic/
Geophysical/ Other
Testing

Discharge to
Receiving
Waters

Dust Control

Waste
Injection

Incorporated into
Products/
By- roducts/Waste
P

30

Solid Waste
Wastes
Current Flowback Water Management
Approaches
•

Evaporation in pits/ponds

•

Trucked off-site for:
−

Reinjection into Class II disposal wells

−

Treatment at a commercial wastewater treatment plant or a
POTW if disposal wells are not available.

•
•

31

Direct reuse for fracing by diluting it with makeup
water-considered best practice
Treatment for reuse or surface discharge
Available Treatment Technologies

Contaminant

Process

Comments

Free oil, TSS, Bacteria

DGF/Filtration/ UV Biocides

Low cost technologies $2/bbl

Scale formers(Ba,Ca,Fe,Mg,Mn)

Clarifier water softening ,electrocoagulation,
ceramic membranes

Attractive for reuse in fraccing,
waste stream created, $2-8/bbl

Dissolved solids

Membranes/RO/Evaporators/Crystallisers

See table

Volatile organics

Stripping and incineration, AC, Ozone oxidation

air discharge and energy usage
Create waste AC, ozone energy
intensive
up to $4/bbl

Dissolved organics

Biological oxidation

general

Chemical treatments

Susceptible to toxic shocks,
operating knowledge, not short
term
Wide range offered
Summary of Characteristics of Major Flowback Water
Treatment Technologies-discharge and or reuse
Ion Exchange

Reverse Osmosis

EDR

Thermal
Distillation

Energy Cost

Low

Moderate

High

High

Energy Usage vs TDS

Low

Increase

High Increase

Independent

Applicable to

All Water types

Moderate TDS

High TDS

High TDS

Plant/Unit size

Small/Modular

Modular

Modular

Large

Possible

Possible

Low

N/A

Complexity of Technology

Easy

Moderate/High
Maintenance

Regular
Maintenance

Complex

Scaling Potential

Low

High

Low

Low

Theoretical TDS Feed Limit

N/A

32,000

40,000

100,000+

Filtration

Extensive

Filtration

Minimal

200-500 ppm

200-500 ppm

200-1000 ppm

< 10 mg/L

N/A

Low (30-50%)

Medium (60-80%)

High (75-85%)

Characteristics

Microbiological Fouling

Pretreatment Requirement
Final Water TDS
Recovery Rate
(Feed TDS >20,000mg/L)

33
Play Characteristics and Treatment

Flowback %

Salinity/
TDS Values

Medium to high

50,000 to
140,000

Play

Barnett
Black Warrior

500 to 140,000

Eagle Ford

Haynesville
Marcellus
Niobara

Permian
Piceance
Powder River

34

Other
Issues*

Low

BTEX, Boron,
2,000 to 10,000 Ammonia
NORM, BTEX,
90,000 to Scale formers,
200,000
Boron, Ammonia
40,000 to NORM, BTEX,
240,000
Ammonia
1,000 to 10,000
NORM, BTEX,
Scale formers,
30,000
Boron, Ammonia

Typical Treatment System Components

Residual Water Disposal

solids removal, chem precip, thermal
evaporation
solids removal, chem precip, RO or
evaporation

surface discharge or
injection well

Solids removal, chem precip, RO

Injection well

Organics / solids removal, evaporator

Injection well

Organics and solids removal, evaporation
Solids removal, chem precip, RO

Injection wells in Ohio
Injection well

Organics and solids removal, chem precip,
RO or evaporation
Injection well
solids removal, chem precip, RO or
surface discharge or
Medium to high 1,000 to 15,000
evaporation
injection well
Ba, Iron, Na, TDS Greensands, Ion exchange , RO
Flowback Pre-treatment Followed by Thermal
Evaporation for Disposal

35
Flowback Pre-treatment Followed by Membrane
Separation for Disposal

36
Frac Fluid Lifecycle
Modular
Movable
Treatment
Gas

Fraccing
Fluid

Hydrocarbon
Flowback
~25 – 70%

Flowback/
Produced
Water

Hydrocarbon/
Water

Residues

Storage Pond
Excess water
requiring disposal
or beneficial use

Chemical
Precipitation

(RO)

Fraccing
Fluid
Flowback
Makeup
Water

37

Solids/
Organics
Removal

Filtration

Frac
Chemicals

Last
Well

Treated Water

First
Well

TYPICAL
TREATMENT
SYSTEM
COMPONENTS

Intermediate
Storage
Lifecycle Water Management Approach

•
•
•

Optimize Water Re-use in Fracing
Minimize Lifecycle Costs while Meeting Production Needs
Minimize environmental footprints

By
Reuse of frac water
modular mobile unit for frac water reuse

38

Water Reuse: Technologies for Industrial and Municipal Applications

  • 1.
    Water Reuse: Technologiesfor Industrial & Municipal Applications Daniel Christodoss, Ph.D., P.E. (Principal Municipal Engineer) John Kovski, P.E. (Department Manager - Engineering) URS Corporation, Houston, TX (713) 914-6699 | daniel.christodoss@urs.com | john.kovski@urs.com 2013 9th Annual Practical “WATER Issues & Technologies” Short Course Sponsored by: Food Protein R&D Center Texas A&M University College Station, TX
  • 2.
    Outline World Water Stress WaterUse by Industry Sector Water Demand 2010 to 2060 Case for Reclamation (reuse) Water Reuse Process (Food Industry) Water Reuse Process (Oil & Gas) Water Reuse Process (Municipal) Water Reuse Process (Agricultural)
  • 3.
    Diminishing Water Resources Criticalworldwide concern Previously developing nation’s issues Now Global Crisis Quantity and Quality Issues From Surplus to Limited
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Source: Earth Forum:Houston Museum of Natural Science
  • 7.
    TX Surface Water 3%Freshwater Source: www.fracfocus.org & Estimated Use of Water in the United States, USGS 2005
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    “I am convincedthat, under present conditions and with the way water is being managed, we will run out of water long before we run out of fuel.” – former CEO of Nestle, Peter BrabeckLetmathe in The Economist (2008) Source: AiChE 2011 Eastman Kodak Co.
  • 15.
    EPA, 2012 Process WaterRecovery Treatment Plant Frito Lay, AZ
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Refinery WW Reusefor Boiler Feed Water (BFW) Source: 2012 Industrial Waste and Pretreatment Seminar, Virginia Water Env Assn., AECOM
  • 19.
    Source: SAWEA 2005Workshop, ZENON Environmental, Inc.
  • 20.
    Membranes Dominate IndustrialWater Reuse Source: SAWEA 2005 Workshop, ZENON Environmental, Inc.
  • 21.
    Osmotic pressure Fresh water Salinewater (a) direct osmosis Semipermeable membrane (b) osmotic-equilibrium (c) reverse osmosis
  • 22.
    KBR 2005 Wastewater Recyclefor Boiler Feed-Houston Ship Channel
  • 23.
    KBR 2005 Wastewater Recyclefor Boiler Feed-Houston Ship Channel
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Example Resource RecoveryCenter Sewage Primary Clarifier or Filter Low Energy Membrane for BOD and TSS Removal Food waste, misc. organics Electricity Methane Nutrient Removal and Recovery Anaerobic Digester Primary Revenue Ultrapure water for industry makeup and aquifer recharge Peak electricity sales to grid Electricity Generation CO2 Algae Conversion to Biodiesel Final Filter Secondary Revenue Irrigation water Fuel savings Inorganic fertilizer AICHE 2011 Eastman Kodak Co
  • 26.
    Wetlands Cell Rainwater is collected fromthe roof top, stored in UG Cisterns and used to flush toilets Rainwater UG Cistern Drip Irrigation Settling Equalization tank Tank Trickling Filter EPA, 2012 Water Purification Eco-Center
  • 27.
    North American ShalePlays Water management is a key element in all of the shale plays KEY ELEMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT is: The Water Lifecycle Development Approach to Flowback and Produced Water Treatment and Management Data Collection Concept/Feasibility Studies Bench-/Pilot-scale Testing Technology Screening and Identification Lifecycle Cost Evaluation 27
  • 28.
    North American Experience Variationswithin and between shale plays Flowback % Salinity /TDS Values Formation-Derived Inputs (e.g., Scale Formers, NORM) Locational differences but common treatment and disposal scenarios 28 MULTIPLE SHALE PLAYS
  • 29.
    Play Characteristics Play Barnett Flowback % Mediumto high (3070%) Black Warrior Eagle Ford Haynesville Salinity/ TDS Values 50,000 to 140,000 500 to 140,000 2,000 to 10,000 Low (5%) 90,000 to 200,000 Marcellus Niobara 40,000 to 240,000 1,000 to 10,000 Permian 30,000 Piceance Utica 29 Medium to high Other Issues* 1,000 to 15,000 >100,000 BTEX, Boron, Ammonia NORM, BTEX, Scale formers, Boron, Ammonia NORM, BTEX, Ammonia NORM, BTEX, Scale formers, Boron, Ammonia
  • 30.
    COMPONENTS OF UNCONVENTIONALGAS LIFECYCLE WATER MANAGMENT Water Sources Groundwater Withdrawals Stream Withdrawals Conveyance Conveyance Storage Tank Truck Delivery Portable Storage Tanks at Well Sites Fracture Stimulation Holding Ponds at Well Sites Well Drilling/ Construction Pipe Delivery Uses Flowback/Produced Flow Back/ Water Brines & Brines Potential Treatment Skid or Facility Well Completion and Appurtenances Treated Effluent from WWTP Public Water Supply Reuse Reuse for Development Hydrostatic/ Geophysical/ Other Testing Discharge to Receiving Waters Dust Control Waste Injection Incorporated into Products/ By- roducts/Waste P 30 Solid Waste Wastes
  • 31.
    Current Flowback WaterManagement Approaches • Evaporation in pits/ponds • Trucked off-site for: − Reinjection into Class II disposal wells − Treatment at a commercial wastewater treatment plant or a POTW if disposal wells are not available. • • 31 Direct reuse for fracing by diluting it with makeup water-considered best practice Treatment for reuse or surface discharge
  • 32.
    Available Treatment Technologies Contaminant Process Comments Freeoil, TSS, Bacteria DGF/Filtration/ UV Biocides Low cost technologies $2/bbl Scale formers(Ba,Ca,Fe,Mg,Mn) Clarifier water softening ,electrocoagulation, ceramic membranes Attractive for reuse in fraccing, waste stream created, $2-8/bbl Dissolved solids Membranes/RO/Evaporators/Crystallisers See table Volatile organics Stripping and incineration, AC, Ozone oxidation air discharge and energy usage Create waste AC, ozone energy intensive up to $4/bbl Dissolved organics Biological oxidation general Chemical treatments Susceptible to toxic shocks, operating knowledge, not short term Wide range offered
  • 33.
    Summary of Characteristicsof Major Flowback Water Treatment Technologies-discharge and or reuse Ion Exchange Reverse Osmosis EDR Thermal Distillation Energy Cost Low Moderate High High Energy Usage vs TDS Low Increase High Increase Independent Applicable to All Water types Moderate TDS High TDS High TDS Plant/Unit size Small/Modular Modular Modular Large Possible Possible Low N/A Complexity of Technology Easy Moderate/High Maintenance Regular Maintenance Complex Scaling Potential Low High Low Low Theoretical TDS Feed Limit N/A 32,000 40,000 100,000+ Filtration Extensive Filtration Minimal 200-500 ppm 200-500 ppm 200-1000 ppm < 10 mg/L N/A Low (30-50%) Medium (60-80%) High (75-85%) Characteristics Microbiological Fouling Pretreatment Requirement Final Water TDS Recovery Rate (Feed TDS >20,000mg/L) 33
  • 34.
    Play Characteristics andTreatment Flowback % Salinity/ TDS Values Medium to high 50,000 to 140,000 Play Barnett Black Warrior 500 to 140,000 Eagle Ford Haynesville Marcellus Niobara Permian Piceance Powder River 34 Other Issues* Low BTEX, Boron, 2,000 to 10,000 Ammonia NORM, BTEX, 90,000 to Scale formers, 200,000 Boron, Ammonia 40,000 to NORM, BTEX, 240,000 Ammonia 1,000 to 10,000 NORM, BTEX, Scale formers, 30,000 Boron, Ammonia Typical Treatment System Components Residual Water Disposal solids removal, chem precip, thermal evaporation solids removal, chem precip, RO or evaporation surface discharge or injection well Solids removal, chem precip, RO Injection well Organics / solids removal, evaporator Injection well Organics and solids removal, evaporation Solids removal, chem precip, RO Injection wells in Ohio Injection well Organics and solids removal, chem precip, RO or evaporation Injection well solids removal, chem precip, RO or surface discharge or Medium to high 1,000 to 15,000 evaporation injection well Ba, Iron, Na, TDS Greensands, Ion exchange , RO
  • 35.
    Flowback Pre-treatment Followedby Thermal Evaporation for Disposal 35
  • 36.
    Flowback Pre-treatment Followedby Membrane Separation for Disposal 36
  • 37.
    Frac Fluid Lifecycle Modular Movable Treatment Gas Fraccing Fluid Hydrocarbon Flowback ~25– 70% Flowback/ Produced Water Hydrocarbon/ Water Residues Storage Pond Excess water requiring disposal or beneficial use Chemical Precipitation (RO) Fraccing Fluid Flowback Makeup Water 37 Solids/ Organics Removal Filtration Frac Chemicals Last Well Treated Water First Well TYPICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM COMPONENTS Intermediate Storage
  • 38.
    Lifecycle Water ManagementApproach • • • Optimize Water Re-use in Fracing Minimize Lifecycle Costs while Meeting Production Needs Minimize environmental footprints By Reuse of frac water modular mobile unit for frac water reuse 38