Mount Prospect ,
Illinois

NW Suburb of Chicago

Population: 56,000
Mount Prospect
Public Library
Architect: Meyer, Scherer &
Rockcastle, Ltd.

Contractor: The Meyne
Company, a Division of Bulley
and Andrews, LLC

Owner Representative:
Owner Services Group

Space Plan: Library Planning
Associates, Inc.
Expense Category                Budget          Pct.


Bond / Finance Costs                     $     286,000     1.3%

Professional Service Costs                    3,878,000   18.1%

Building & Site-Related Costs                13,375,000   64.0%
Fixtures/Furnishings/Equipment (FF&E)         2,190,000   10.2%
Contingency                                   1,361,000    6.3%

  TOTAL                                 $ 21,450,000      100%



Project cost
Cost savings                  Non-monetary benefits
 1976 building designed for    Center of village
 future expansion              Anchor for a revitalized
 Saved 30% construction        downtown business area
 cost versus new
                               Close proximity to other
 Eliminated costly site
 studies                       municipal buildings
 Eliminated need to            Pedestrian friendly
 purchase land                 Easy walking and biking
 Found temporary location      Shared parking with Village
 requiring minimal upgrade     Hall
 Kept space plan current by
 updating every few years

Staying at same location and
re-inventing building
re-
Then                      Now
 50,000 square feet        101,000 square feet
 Dark brown interior       No dark interior brick
 brick                     Painted walls
 Dark almost black floor   Mix of flooring
 tile                      types/colors
 Long dark entry           Large windows and
 Narrow windows            natural light
 Heavy oak paneling        Interior is bright and
 Orange carpet             reflects light
 Technology “unfriendly”   Larger openings/doors
                           Technology flexible

1976 and 2004
1976 and 2004 - Meeting Room
1976 and 2004 - Entry
CONSTRAINTS:
 Could not afford the third floor schemes
 Could not afford to move the entry to face
 Village Hall

DECISION:
 Maintain the same building “footprint”
 Keep essentially the same travel patterns
 and layout
1976 and 2004
Entry Design
1976 and 2004
Entry Design
Light box
Etched glass wall
Upper lobby area
Stairwell to second floor
Windows
  Natural Light
Ceilings
 Visual Interest
Add picture   Ceilings -
              •Added   height on the second
              floor
              •Barrel lighting (alternate in
              construction bid)
              •Result – dramatic change and
              a very different feel than the
              first floor
Teen Zone
    “Our” Space
Teen Zone
Faux stone
 Eucalyptus wood contrasted with makore
 (color similar to mahogany)
 Textured carpet on second floor
 Colorful carpet in Youth Services
 Terrazzo and cork flooring
 Lighting - brightly lit service desks


Using color and texture
Jewel Box – 1st floor   Light Box – 2nd floor
  Strong rich colors      Muted colors
  Green, blue, purple     Texture based
  Fun                     Higher finishes
  Energy                  Calming




Using color and texture
Youth Department
Brightly
                      illuminated
                      desk draws
                      patrons to the
                      service area.

                      Carpet colors,
                      light boxes and
                      painted walls.




Youth Services desk
Family Place / Early Literacy
Preschool area
“The Portholes”
Youth color
                  boxes provide
                  interest and
                  fun to the
                  room.




Youth Color Box
Monty the Duck
Fondly called “the caterpillar”
Perimeter
study areas
Adult Business   Grade School
Delayed purchasing
 art
 Delayed putting in a
 snack/drink area
 Installed infrastructure
 for fiber optic and
 WIFI but didn’t
 implement until a few
 years later


Other cost savings
Plan now, save later.
 You can re-invent an
 outdated building if
 the structure is sound
 for renovation and
 expansion
 Tight design of the
 work and public
 space.
 Use - mix of color,
 texture, materials


In conclusion
Marilyn Genther, Executive Director
Cathy Deane, Deputy Director Public Service
Tom Garvin, Head of Building Services
Tim Loga, Head of Computer Services

(847) 253-5675




Contacts at MPPL
Thank you

Mount Prospect Public Library

  • 2.
    Mount Prospect , Illinois NWSuburb of Chicago Population: 56,000
  • 3.
    Mount Prospect Public Library Architect:Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Contractor: The Meyne Company, a Division of Bulley and Andrews, LLC Owner Representative: Owner Services Group Space Plan: Library Planning Associates, Inc.
  • 5.
    Expense Category Budget Pct. Bond / Finance Costs $ 286,000 1.3% Professional Service Costs 3,878,000 18.1% Building & Site-Related Costs 13,375,000 64.0% Fixtures/Furnishings/Equipment (FF&E) 2,190,000 10.2% Contingency 1,361,000 6.3% TOTAL $ 21,450,000 100% Project cost
  • 6.
    Cost savings Non-monetary benefits 1976 building designed for Center of village future expansion Anchor for a revitalized Saved 30% construction downtown business area cost versus new Close proximity to other Eliminated costly site studies municipal buildings Eliminated need to Pedestrian friendly purchase land Easy walking and biking Found temporary location Shared parking with Village requiring minimal upgrade Hall Kept space plan current by updating every few years Staying at same location and re-inventing building re-
  • 7.
    Then Now 50,000 square feet 101,000 square feet Dark brown interior No dark interior brick brick Painted walls Dark almost black floor Mix of flooring tile types/colors Long dark entry Large windows and Narrow windows natural light Heavy oak paneling Interior is bright and Orange carpet reflects light Technology “unfriendly” Larger openings/doors Technology flexible 1976 and 2004
  • 8.
    1976 and 2004- Meeting Room
  • 9.
  • 10.
    CONSTRAINTS: Could notafford the third floor schemes Could not afford to move the entry to face Village Hall DECISION: Maintain the same building “footprint” Keep essentially the same travel patterns and layout
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 20.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 30.
  • 32.
    Add picture Ceilings - •Added height on the second floor •Barrel lighting (alternate in construction bid) •Result – dramatic change and a very different feel than the first floor
  • 33.
    Teen Zone “Our” Space
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Faux stone Eucalyptuswood contrasted with makore (color similar to mahogany) Textured carpet on second floor Colorful carpet in Youth Services Terrazzo and cork flooring Lighting - brightly lit service desks Using color and texture
  • 36.
    Jewel Box –1st floor Light Box – 2nd floor Strong rich colors Muted colors Green, blue, purple Texture based Fun Higher finishes Energy Calming Using color and texture
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Brightly illuminated desk draws patrons to the service area. Carpet colors, light boxes and painted walls. Youth Services desk
  • 39.
    Family Place /Early Literacy
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Youth color boxes provide interest and fun to the room. Youth Color Box
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Fondly called “thecaterpillar”
  • 45.
  • 46.
    Adult Business Grade School
  • 47.
    Delayed purchasing art Delayed putting in a snack/drink area Installed infrastructure for fiber optic and WIFI but didn’t implement until a few years later Other cost savings
  • 48.
    Plan now, savelater. You can re-invent an outdated building if the structure is sound for renovation and expansion Tight design of the work and public space. Use - mix of color, texture, materials In conclusion
  • 49.
    Marilyn Genther, ExecutiveDirector Cathy Deane, Deputy Director Public Service Tom Garvin, Head of Building Services Tim Loga, Head of Computer Services (847) 253-5675 Contacts at MPPL
  • 50.