Downloaded 34 times
More Related Content
Similar to IKM Architects: Case Study Higher Education Renovation-2012
IKM Architects: Case Study Higher Education Renovation-2012
- 1. Adaptive Reuse ofHistoric Structures: Transforming Assets to Support Your Mission architecture planning interior design For more information visit: www.ikminc.com Connect with us:
- 2. A Case Study THEGROVE CITY COLLEGE CARNEGIE ALUMNI CENTER
- 3. Presenters • John Schrott,AIA IKM Incorporated Architects • Michael McDonnell, AIA IKM Incorporated Architects • Thomas Gregg Grove City College, Vice President Operations
- 4. Presentation Objectives • Explorethe significance of historic buildings to a campus • Explore some typical challenges/opportunities facing reusing or upgrading an historic building • Explore a process of transformation • Explore the outcomes of the process
- 5.
- 6.
- 7. • Corner ofMain & Broad Streets • Oldest publicly used building on campus Prominent lower campus location
- 8. • Recreation – lower level • Library – main level • Auditorium – sloped floor & stage – upper level Carnegie Library
- 9. 1930s – UpperCampus Starts to Develop
- 10. Focal Point ofLower Campus
- 11. Focal Point ofLower Campus
- 12. Focal Point ofLower Campus
- 13. • 1950s –Library moves: building becomes Carnegie Music Hall • 1970s – Music moves: building becomes AFROTC home until late 1980s • Early 1990s – Alumni & Career Services office move in • Late 1990s – Institutional Advancement offices expand Campus migrates east – Building Use Changes
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. Grove City CollegeLower Campus - Today
- 17. • Appropriate venuefor alumni needed • Alumni & Institutional Advancement Offices identify with location plus no other space available for relocation • Need to address building accessibility & restroom capacity problems Lower Campus Vacated – Opportunities for Site Development Exist
- 18. • Create abetter ‘front door’ to the campus • Strengthen the connection between Alumni and Campus • Next step in revitalizing the lower campus creating a focal point • Improve the work environment for all users Project Goals and Objectives
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29. • Grove CityCollege initial project direction with Goals and Objectives • Stakeholder meetings to explore opportunities • Smaller Focus Groups/Charettes to develop concepts/refine options • Reconvene for validation by Administration Core Team Consensus Building
- 30.
- 31. • Iterative/Interactive process • Stakeholder engagement • Program Monitor • Administrative Core Team Validation • Cost Estimate • Value Engineering Process Conceptual Design
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39. PROCESS – FUNDRAISINGPERIOD
- 40. • Need tocomplete fundraising for Change and Commitment Campaign • Original program called for $8-$10 million building – Campaign & alumni do not support this amount – Scope & resultant cost reductions needed – Work with IKM & Construction Manager (Tedco) to achieve reductions – Final Project Cost $7.3 million Fundraising
- 41.
- 42.
- 43. PROCESS – DESIGNTRANSFORMATION
- 44. Design – FunctionalProgram – Lower Level
- 45. Design – FunctionalProgram – Lower Level
- 46. Design – FunctionalProgram – Lower Level
- 47. Design – FunctionalProgram – Lower Level
- 48. Design – FunctionalProgram – Main Level
- 49. Design – FunctionalProgram – Main Level
- 50. Design – FunctionalProgram – Second Level
- 51. Design – FunctionalProgram – Second Level
- 52. Design – FunctionalProgram – Second Level
- 53. Design – FunctionalProgram – Exterior Space
- 54.
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58. Design – ExteriorEnvelop
- 59. • Bring systems up to code • Energy efficiency • Minimize impact to architecture • Provide sophisticated A/V • Support an efficient work environment Design – MEP Imperatives
- 60. Design – BuildingAppearance
- 61. Design – BuildingAppearance
- 62. • Early Estimate • Value Modifications • CM analyses throughout design • Consistent teamwork to identify opportunities Design Cost Controls
- 63.
- 64. • New (34ton) Air cooled chilled water generation • New High Efficiency condensing boilers • New High Efficiency Hot water heaters • Architectural Wall Heaters • Quiet air distribution systems • Snow melt system Final Product – MEP Infrastructure HVAC
- 65.
- 66.
- 67. • New toiletrooms • Kitchen/Food preparation area • All new sprinkler system Outcome – Plumbing/Fire Protection Infrastructure
- 68. Outcome– Plumbing/Fire ProtectionInfrastructure
- 69. • New Electrical Service • Efficient lighting for offices • Specialty lights for Ballroom • New telephone system • Cable for Data/Voice and specialty requirements • Transformer and generator housed in adjacent student housing and were sized to support Carnegie Renovation/Addition Outcome – Electrical/Data
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.
- 73.
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82.
- 83. • Wonderful venueat the front door to the community & campus • Modern, professional office for Institutional Advancement – Fully functional building for hosting campus & community events – Easy to access – Great for receptions – nice décor & amenities – Comfortable HVAC system – Full multi-media presentation capabilities Outcome – Impact to GCC
- 84. • Historical Buildingsare a valuable asset to any institution • Transformation can be achieved through clear, direct goals and objectives • Cost effective solutions are available • Adaptive Reuse can be a tool to leverage the asset to new and better purpose. Summary
- 85.
- 86. architecture planning interior design For more information visit: www.ikminc.com Connect with us: