The document describes and compares three reading models: the bottom-up model which emphasizes decoding skills and text-driven instruction; the top-down model which emphasizes the reader's background knowledge and comprehension with a holistic approach; and the interactive model which sees the reading process as both text- and reader-driven and emphasizes balanced comprehension and decoding skills.
Theories in reading instruction
TOP-DOWN READING MODEL
Emphasizes what the reader brings to the text
Says reading is driven by meaning
Proceeds from whole to part
Views from some researchers
1. Frank Smith – Reading is not decoding written language to spoken language
2. reading is a matter of bringing meaning to print
FEATURES OF TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Readers can comprehend a selection even though they do not recognize each word.
Readers should use meaning and grammatical cues to identify unrecognized words.
Reading for meaning is the primary objective of reading, rather than mastery of letters, letters/sound relationships and words.
FEATURES OF TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Reading requires the use of meaning activities than the mastery of series of word- recognition skills.
The primary focus of instruction should be the reading of sentences, paragraphs, and whole selections
The most important aspect about reading is the amount and kind of information gained through reading.
BOTTOM UP
Emphasizes a single direction
Emphasizes the written or printed texts
Part to whole model
Reading is driven by a process that results in meaning
PROPONENTS OF THE BOTTOM UP
Flesch 1955
Gough 1985
FEATURES OF BOTTOM-UP
Believes the reader needs to:
Identify letter features
Link these features to recognize letters
Combine letter to recognize spelling patterns
Link spelling patterns to recognize words
Proceed to sentence, paragraph, and text- level processing
INTERACTIVE READING MODEL
It recognizes the interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes simultaneously throughout the reading process.
Reading as an active process that depends on reader characteristics, the text, and the reading situation (Rumelhart, 1985)
Attempts to combine the valid insights of bottom-up and top-down models.
PROPONENTS OF THE INTERACTIVE READING MODEL
Rumelhart, D. 1985
Barr, Sadow, and Blachowicz 1990
Ruddell and Speaker 1985
Theories in reading instruction
TOP-DOWN READING MODEL
Emphasizes what the reader brings to the text
Says reading is driven by meaning
Proceeds from whole to part
Views from some researchers
1. Frank Smith – Reading is not decoding written language to spoken language
2. reading is a matter of bringing meaning to print
FEATURES OF TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Readers can comprehend a selection even though they do not recognize each word.
Readers should use meaning and grammatical cues to identify unrecognized words.
Reading for meaning is the primary objective of reading, rather than mastery of letters, letters/sound relationships and words.
FEATURES OF TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Reading requires the use of meaning activities than the mastery of series of word- recognition skills.
The primary focus of instruction should be the reading of sentences, paragraphs, and whole selections
The most important aspect about reading is the amount and kind of information gained through reading.
BOTTOM UP
Emphasizes a single direction
Emphasizes the written or printed texts
Part to whole model
Reading is driven by a process that results in meaning
PROPONENTS OF THE BOTTOM UP
Flesch 1955
Gough 1985
FEATURES OF BOTTOM-UP
Believes the reader needs to:
Identify letter features
Link these features to recognize letters
Combine letter to recognize spelling patterns
Link spelling patterns to recognize words
Proceed to sentence, paragraph, and text- level processing
INTERACTIVE READING MODEL
It recognizes the interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes simultaneously throughout the reading process.
Reading as an active process that depends on reader characteristics, the text, and the reading situation (Rumelhart, 1985)
Attempts to combine the valid insights of bottom-up and top-down models.
PROPONENTS OF THE INTERACTIVE READING MODEL
Rumelhart, D. 1985
Barr, Sadow, and Blachowicz 1990
Ruddell and Speaker 1985
BY: NUR FAZLIN MOHD NAIM & friends
This was my group presentation for TSL 1064 Drama in English. This is a compulsory subject for all the TESL students in PPISMP Semester 2.
I hope by uploading this presentation, it will help the viewers especially for the TESL students from IPG.
If you happen to like this powerpoint, you may contact me at flippedchannel@gmail.com
I offer some educational services like:
-powerpoint presentation maker
-grammarian
-content creator
-layout designer
Subscribe to our online platforms:
FlippED Channel (Youtube)
http://bit.ly/FlippEDChannel
LET in the NET (facebook)
http://bit.ly/LETndNET
Annotation Bookmarks: Supporting Active Reading in the Language ClassroomCLIC_Illinois
A presentation by Amber Dunse at the 2016 "Language Teaching Share Fair" organized by the Center for Language Instruction and Coordination (clic.illinois.edu)
2. Ω Emphasizes the READER, with
his/her background knowledge
or previous experiences
Ω Emphasizes COMPREHENSION
Ω Holistic and literature-based
instruction
3. Ω Emphasizes material being
read (text)
Ω Emphasizes DECODING
Ω Skills-oriented instruction
4. Ω Emphasizes both READER and
TEXT
Ω Emphasizes both
COMPREHENSION and
DECODING
Ω Balanced instruction
5. TOP-DOWN MODEL INTERACTIVE
MODEL
BOTTOM-UP
MODEL
Concept-driven;
relies on the
reader’s previous
experiences
Both CONTEXT-
and TEXT-driven
TEXT-driven
Emphasizes the
READER
Emphasizes both
READER & TEXT
Emphasizes the
TEXT
Emphasizes
COMPREHENSION
Emphasizes both
COMPREHENSION
& DECODING
Emphasizes
DECODING
Instruction tends to
be holistic,
literature-based;
flexible in grouping
strategies
Instruction tends to
be balanced; allows
for various forms of
grouping
Instruction tends to
be skills-oriented;
grouping by ability
6. With a partner, evaluate each of the 3
models, using the format below:
READING MODEL STRONG POINTS WEAK POINTS
TOP-DOWN
BOTTOM-UP
INTERACTIVE
7.
8. • Readers can comprehend a selection evenReaders can comprehend a selection even
though they do not recognize each wordthough they do not recognize each word
• Readers should use meaning and grammaticalReaders should use meaning and grammatical
cues to identify unrecognized wordscues to identify unrecognized words
• Primary focus of instruction should be the readingPrimary focus of instruction should be the reading
of sentences, paragraphs, and whole selectionsof sentences, paragraphs, and whole selections
(from WHOLE to PART:(from WHOLE to PART: Deductive)Deductive)
9. Application: TOP DOWNApplication: TOP DOWN
• Suggest reading materialsSuggest reading materials
which you think are best for awhich you think are best for a
reading class where the topreading class where the top
down model is employed bydown model is employed by
the teacherthe teacher
10. • Proceeds from PART to WHOLEProceeds from PART to WHOLE
(Inductive), e.g. phoneme to syllable,(Inductive), e.g. phoneme to syllable,
syllables to words, words tosyllables to words, words to
sentences…sentences…
• Combine letters to recognize spellingCombine letters to recognize spelling
patternspatterns
• Reading is driven by text, not theReading is driven by text, not the
readerreader
11. Application: BOTTOM-Application: BOTTOM-
UPUP
• Cite specific examples ofCite specific examples of
activities that a readingactivities that a reading
teacher using the bottom-upteacher using the bottom-up
model gives to her readingmodel gives to her reading
classclass
12. • Suggests that the readerSuggests that the reader
CONSTRUCTS meaning by theCONSTRUCTS meaning by the
selective use of information from allselective use of information from all
sources of meaningsources of meaning
• Recognizes the interaction of bottom-Recognizes the interaction of bottom-
up and top down processup and top down process
simultaneously throughout the readingsimultaneously throughout the reading
processprocess