The document summarizes several prominent reading models: the bottom-up and top-down models, which emphasize text-based or experience-based reading respectively; the interactive model, which combines these approaches; Rumelhart's model of perceptual and cognitive processes in reading; Stanovich's interactive-compensatory model; the schema-theoretic view of Anderson and Pearson; Pearson and Tierney's model of the reader as an active composer; and Mathewson's model of the role of attitude and motivation in reading.
3. What are reading models
are graphics that attempt to depict how an individual perceives a word,
processes a clause, and comprehends a text.
----Singer and Ruddell 1985
are different explanations how the complex process of reading takes place.
4. BOTTOM-UP READING MODEL
It is a reading model that emphasizes the written or printed text.
It emphasizes the ability to decode or put into sound what is seen in the text.
Readers derive meaning in a linear manner.
DECODING
LETTERS
WORDS PHRASES SENTENCES
6. TOP-DOWN READING MODEL
Processing of a text begins in the mind of the readers with meaning –driven
processes, or an assumption about the meaning of a text.
Emphasizes readers bringing meaning to text based on their experiential
background and prior knowledge.
It is a model in which TOP is the higher order mental and BOTTOM as the
physical text on the page.
It is where meaning takes precedence over structure.
8. INTERACTIVE READING MODEL
Combination of Bottom-up and Top-down processes.
Good readers are both good decoders and good interpreters of the
text(Eskey,1998).
Reader and text interact as the reader uses prior background knowledge and
knowledge from the text to derive meaning (Grabe,1991).
Uses print as input and has meaning as output(Goodman,1981).
11. RUMELHART MODEL
(1977)
States that successful reading is both a PERCEPTUAL and a COGNITIVE
process.
stresses the influence of various sources namely feature extraction,
orthographic knowledge, lexical, syntactic and semantic knowledge
“message centre” which allows the sources of knowledge to interact
with each other and thereby enable higher-level processing to
influence lower-level processing.
David E. Rumelhart
13. STANOVICH MODEL
Interactive-compensatory reading model.
Readers relies on both bottom up and top down processes
simultaneously and alternatively depending on the reading purpose,
motivation, schema and knowledge of the subject.
Compensatory mode with the interaction between the top-down and
bottom-up processing.
Believes that if there is a deficiency at an early print-analysis stage
(BU), higher order knowledge structures (TD) will attempt to
compensate.
notes that for the poor reader, who may be both inaccurate and slow
at word recognition but who has knowledge of the text-topic, TD
processing may allow for this compensation
Keith E. Stanovich
15. EXAMPLE:
The jeweler put the green emerald in the ring
JEWELER GEMS
JEWELRIES
SUCH AS RINGS
16. ANDERSON and PEARSON SCHEMA-
THEORETIC VIEW
It focuses on the role of schemata (knowledge stored in memory) in
text comprehension.
Comprehension = interaction between old & new information
Schema Theory: Already known general ideas subsume & anchor new
information.
-Includes: a) info about the relationships among the components, b)
role of inference & c) reliance on knowledge of the content, + abstract &
general schemata.
-schemata
-schema
P. David Pearson
17. PEARSON and TIERNEY R/W MODEL
Negotiation of meaning between writer & reader who both create
meaning through the text as the medium.
Readers as composers
Reader reads with the expectation that the writer has provided
sufficient clues about the meaning
Writer writes with the intention the reader will create meaning
Consider: pragmatic theories of language that every speech acts,
utterance, or attempt at comprehending an utterance is an action
18. Reading is an act of composing rather than recitation or
regurgitation
Context is important
Knowing why something was said is as crucial to
interpreting the message as knowing what was said
Failing to recognize author’s goal can interfere with
comprehension of the main idea or point of view
Focus on the thoughtful reader with 4 interactive roles:
Planner
Composer
Editor
Monitor
19. MATHEWSON’S MODEL OF ATTITUDE
INFLUENCE
A model that addresses the role that attitude and motivation play in
reading
Attitude intention to read reading
Attitude = tri-componential construct:
Cognitive component (evaluation), affective component (feeling) , &
conative component (action readiness) Conative = personality,
volition, temperament.
This provides feedback on how motivation may change & how
important it is to address affective issues in teaching reading.
20. Attitude toward reading may be modified by a change in
reader’s goal
Examples:
Topic of no interest
Feedback during reading may affect attitude and
motivation
1. Satisfaction with affect developed through reading
2. Satisfaction with ideas developed through reading
3. Feelings generated by ideas from the reading process
4. Ideas constructed from in the information read
5. How the reading affects values, goals and self-concept
21. MATHEWSON’S MODEL OF ATTITUDE
INFLUENCE
Cognitive
Component
Affective
Component
Conative
Component
Attitude Towards Reading
Intention to Read
Reading Behavior
22. SUMMARY
READING MODELS:
Bottom-up Reading Model – text-based
Top=down Reading Model- experience-based
Interactive Reading Model- combination of bottom-up and top-down
models
Rumelhart Model- influence of various sources
Stanovich Model- interactive-compensatory
Anderson and Pearson Schema- Theoretic View- schema theory
Pearson and Tierney R/W Model- a reader with four interactive roles
Mathewson’s Model of Attitude Influence – attitude and motivation