With the advancement of technology the world is becoming increasingly interconnected, both
economically and socially. Over the years there has been a significant increase in the percentage of people
accessing the internet and using a mobile phone. The quality of mobile services and the smartphones is
ultimately judged on the basis of one key factor that is, customer satisfaction. This is particularly true in case of
third or fourth generation connectivity. For this purpose we make use of QFD to acquire and analyse the
voice of customer (VOC) and then transform it into product requirements and quality assurance measures
throughout the design, build, test, commercialisation and even product retirement process. In this paper we
have presented an example to illustrate the use of QFD in the process of designing a smartphone based on
customer reviews and their requirements.
💞 Safe And Secure Call Girls Agra Call Girls Service Just Call 🍑👄6378878445 🍑...
Methods and Techniques to Improve the Design of Cell Phones Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) for ICWAME 2017)
1. Methods & techniques to improve the design of
Smart Phones with Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Quality Assurance for Customer Satisfaction
24th February 2017
Prathamesh Mohite and Jimit Shelat
Third Year – B.E. - Production Engineering,
Fr. Conceicao Rodrigues College of Engineering,
Bandra Bandstand, Mumbai, India
International Conference & Workshop on Advances in Mech. Engg. (ICWAME-2017)
2. Slide 2QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
2
Disclaimer
This presentation has been prepared exclusively for the “International Conference
& Workshop on Advances in Mechanical Engg. (ICWAME-2017)”, organized by
MULTICON-W and Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, 24-25 Feb. 2017.
The presentation is intended solely for the benefit of attendees and its contents and
conclusions are confidential and may not be disclosed to any other persons or
companies without the prior written permission of the Author.
The information upon which this presentation is based from own experience,
knowledge and databases and few other references.
The use of this research content was authorized in advance and any further use or
redistribution of it is strictly prohibited without written permission by the Author.
The opinions expressed herein have been achieved internally and are being shared
for the purpose of discussions at the Conference, which are merely directional and
not for any commercial purpose or decisions, and subject to changes as per market
dynamics.
The Author does not accept any liability or claims for your reliance upon them.
3. Slide 3QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
1. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) – Introduction
2. QFD Methodology & Benefits
3. Total Quality Management benefits - House of Quality
4. QFD Model – Core Process Design for Smartphones
5. Key Focus Areas for Smartphones Manufacturers
6. Summary Results
Presentation Outline
4. Slide 4QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
Quality Function Deployment
Key elements :
Identify customer wants
Identify how the goods or services will satisfy customers
Relate customer wants to product specifications
Develop importance ratings
Evaluate competing products
Bench-mark performance to desirable technical parameters
QFD : a method of transferring Customer Needs and Requirements
into Technical Specifications for new product or service development
5. Slide 5QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD Brief History
Dr. Yoji Akao and Shigeru Mizuno, Prof. Emeritus
First implemented at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Kobe Shipyards, 1972
Toyota Minivans (1977 Base)
1979 - 20% Reduction in Product Development & Start-Up Costs
1982 - 38%
1984 - 61%
Dr. Clausing, Xerox, 1984
Can be used for any Manufacturing or Service Industry
7. Slide 7QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD - Building a House of Quality
Relationship
matrix
How to satisfy
customer wants
Inter-relationships
Competitive
assessment
Technical
evaluation
Target values
What the
customer
wants
Customer
importance
ratings
Weighted
rating
8. Slide 8QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
Technical Descriptors
(Voice of the organization)
Prioritized Technical
Descriptors
Interrelationship
between
Technical Descriptors
Customer
Requirements
(VoiceoftheCustomer)
PrioritizedCustomer
Requirements
Relationship between
Requirements and Descriptors
• List Customer Requirements (What’s)
• List Technical Descriptors (How’s)
• Develop Relationship (What’s & How’s)
• Develop Interrelationship (How’s)
• Competitive Assessments
• Prioritize Customer requirements
• Prioritize Technical specifications
QFD – House of Quality details
More Details….
9. Slide 9QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD – House of Quality Sequencing
Deploying resources through the Organization in response to
Customer Requirements……
Design
characteristics
Specific
components
House
2
Customer
requirements
Design
characteristics
House
1
Specific
components
Production
process
House
3
Production
process
Quality
plan
House
4
10. Slide 10QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD – Matrix
Strong Positive
Positive
Negative
Strong Negative
+9
+3
-3
-9
Interrelationship between
Technical Descriptors
(correlation matrix)
HOWs vs. HOWs
More Details….
Interrelationship between technical
decriptors (correlation matrix)
HOWS vs. HOWS
+9 ● Strong Positive
+3 ○ Positive Relationship between customer
-3 X Negative requirements and technical
-9 * Strong Negative descriptors
WHATs vs. HOWs
+9 ●
+3 ○
Secondary +1 Δ
Secondary
Degree of Technical Difficulty
Target Value
Absolute Weight and Percent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Relative Weight and Percent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Strong
Medium
Weak
Scale-upFactor
SalesPoint
Assessment
OurProduct
A'sProduct
B'sProduct
ImportancetoCustomer
TargetValue
Technical Descriptors
(HOWs)
CustomerRequirements
(WHATs)
Customer
Competitive
Primary
Assessment
Prioritized Technical
Descriptors
B's Product
Primary
AbsoluteWeightandPercent
PrioritizedCustomer
Requirements
Our Product
A's Product
Technical
Competitive
11. Slide 11QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD – 4 stages of Smartphones Development
Design
Analysis
Development
Full launch
12. Slide 12QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
QFD - Benefits for Smartphones
Smartphones life cycles are short & dynamic –
QFD provides a fast response on new design changes
House of Quality - correlates customer requirements & technical specs :
• “Long battery life” better hardware design (eg. antenna position)
• “Ease of Use” Processor Power, Bluetooth, WiFi, NFC, A/GPS,
Memory Capacity, etc.
• “Touch-operated Screen Sensibility” advanced materials
13. Slide 13QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
Key Focus Areas for Smartphones Manufacturers
QFD cost analysis can determine which quality characteristics should
be included in the first version and in subsequent generation
Results will be the cost and time effective Smartphones that best
satisfy both mobile service providers and users (customers)
Innovative Technical features can be easily rearranged, so that
Production Engineers can effectively satisfy future customer demands
15. Slide 15QFD – by Prathamesh Mohite & Jimit Shelat (Feb.’17)
Acknowledgements
References
1. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-
economies/
2. Zheng, Xiaosong, and Petri Pulli. "Improving mobile services design: a QFD approach." Computing and Informatics
26.4 (2007): 369-381.
3. http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/153893/cell_phones/the_importance_of_cell_phones_in_modern_soci
ety.html
4. Total Quality Management by Dale H. Besterfield ISBN 978-93-325—3445-2
5. Carnevalli, Jose A., and Paulo Cauchick Miguel. "Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of
research, difficulties and benefits." International Journal of Production Economics 114.2 (2008): 737-754.
6. http://www.eiu.edu/~pingliu/tec5133/resources/fall2008/QFD-Group%20Ppresentation.ppt
7. Chan, Lai-Kow, and Ming-Lu Wu. "Quality function deployment: A literature review." European journal of operational
research 143.3 (2002): 463-497.