This document provides a summary of Medicare claims processing procedures for inpatient hospital billing. It outlines the table of contents which includes sections on general inpatient requirements, payment under the prospective payment system (PPS) diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), additional payment amounts for disproportionate share hospitals, rural hospital flexibility programs, billing coverage and utilization rules, adjustment bills, swing-bed services, and billing instructions for specific situations such as transplants and foreign hospital services. It provides procedural guidance to Medicare contractors for processing inpatient hospital claims.
This document outlines the benefits of outsourcing medical billing services to a third party provider. It discusses five key factors to consider, including increasing revenue through reduced errors and costs. Outsourcing allows practices to focus on patient care instead of billing. Costs are reduced through economies of scale and outsourcing to countries like India with lower labor costs. The provider then details their full medical billing cycle and contact information.
This document outlines the basic steps and requirements for setting up a medical billing project between an India-based operations team and a US-based provider. It includes:
1. Necessary infrastructure for the India team such as medical billing software, servers, phones, and internet access.
2. Details on selecting billing software that can track unpaid claims and customized reporting.
3. The process for insurance enrollment including Medicare, Blue Cross, and Blue Shield.
4. Requirements for provider information needed from the US team.
5. Procedures for transmitting patient data from the US to India team through fax and email.
6. Roles for the India and US teams in claim processing, printing,
The document discusses building rapport with insurance representatives in order to obtain necessary claim information and resolve denied claims. It states that developing professional relationships and making representatives feel comfortable can help obtain solutions. For example, after building a relationship over several calls, one representative provided status on nearly 100 claims after being asked to review legitimate claims. The document also discusses analyzing patient accounts thoroughly before contacting insurers about underpaid claims, as collecting underpayments can generate significant revenue.
- Medical billing companies handle the process of submitting claims to insurance companies and getting paid for physicians' services, as the process is lengthy, complicated, and involves many rules and regulations.
- There are three main parties in medical billing - the physician, the insurance company, and the patient. Medical billing companies work to maximize collections for physicians while complying with insurance company rules and not penalizing patients.
- The main functions of medical billing companies are to process patient information and file claims with private insurance companies and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid in order to get healthcare providers paid on time.
Medicare Part A provides coverage for inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and hospice care. It is funded through the payroll tax and people aged 65+ who are eligible for Social Security are automatically enrolled. Those not receiving Social Security benefits must apply. Part A covers hospital costs, nursing facilities for up to 100 days, home health care with a skilled need, and hospice care for terminally ill patients. Beneficiaries may have copays for certain services covered by Part A.
The medical billing process involves several key steps:
1) Patients make appointments and provide their information;
2) Doctors examine patients, document medical records, and provide medical coding;
3) Coders assign codes to medical records which are then sent to billing;
4) Billers enter patient and visit details, submit claims to insurance, and handle payments and denials.
This document provides guidance on handling different types of claim denials. It discusses how to address denials for non-covered services, missing information, failure to submit an explanation of benefits to the secondary insurer, issues with coordination of benefits, capitation contracts, missing referrals, incorrect diagnosis codes, procedure codes or modifiers, claims being paid to the patient instead of the provider, denials for pre-existing conditions, and cases where the primary insurer has paid their maximum amount. It provides steps like checking eligibility and benefits, obtaining missing documentation, correcting errors, and resubmitting claims for reprocessing when appropriate.
This document outlines the benefits of outsourcing medical billing services to a third party provider. It discusses five key factors to consider, including increasing revenue through reduced errors and costs. Outsourcing allows practices to focus on patient care instead of billing. Costs are reduced through economies of scale and outsourcing to countries like India with lower labor costs. The provider then details their full medical billing cycle and contact information.
This document outlines the basic steps and requirements for setting up a medical billing project between an India-based operations team and a US-based provider. It includes:
1. Necessary infrastructure for the India team such as medical billing software, servers, phones, and internet access.
2. Details on selecting billing software that can track unpaid claims and customized reporting.
3. The process for insurance enrollment including Medicare, Blue Cross, and Blue Shield.
4. Requirements for provider information needed from the US team.
5. Procedures for transmitting patient data from the US to India team through fax and email.
6. Roles for the India and US teams in claim processing, printing,
The document discusses building rapport with insurance representatives in order to obtain necessary claim information and resolve denied claims. It states that developing professional relationships and making representatives feel comfortable can help obtain solutions. For example, after building a relationship over several calls, one representative provided status on nearly 100 claims after being asked to review legitimate claims. The document also discusses analyzing patient accounts thoroughly before contacting insurers about underpaid claims, as collecting underpayments can generate significant revenue.
- Medical billing companies handle the process of submitting claims to insurance companies and getting paid for physicians' services, as the process is lengthy, complicated, and involves many rules and regulations.
- There are three main parties in medical billing - the physician, the insurance company, and the patient. Medical billing companies work to maximize collections for physicians while complying with insurance company rules and not penalizing patients.
- The main functions of medical billing companies are to process patient information and file claims with private insurance companies and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid in order to get healthcare providers paid on time.
Medicare Part A provides coverage for inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and hospice care. It is funded through the payroll tax and people aged 65+ who are eligible for Social Security are automatically enrolled. Those not receiving Social Security benefits must apply. Part A covers hospital costs, nursing facilities for up to 100 days, home health care with a skilled need, and hospice care for terminally ill patients. Beneficiaries may have copays for certain services covered by Part A.
The medical billing process involves several key steps:
1) Patients make appointments and provide their information;
2) Doctors examine patients, document medical records, and provide medical coding;
3) Coders assign codes to medical records which are then sent to billing;
4) Billers enter patient and visit details, submit claims to insurance, and handle payments and denials.
This document provides guidance on handling different types of claim denials. It discusses how to address denials for non-covered services, missing information, failure to submit an explanation of benefits to the secondary insurer, issues with coordination of benefits, capitation contracts, missing referrals, incorrect diagnosis codes, procedure codes or modifiers, claims being paid to the patient instead of the provider, denials for pre-existing conditions, and cases where the primary insurer has paid their maximum amount. It provides steps like checking eligibility and benefits, obtaining missing documentation, correcting errors, and resubmitting claims for reprocessing when appropriate.
This document discusses timely filing limits and requirements for submitting insurance claims. It notes that insurers each have their own time limit for filing claims, and any claims submitted after the limit will not be paid. It provides examples of acceptable proof of timely filing such as clearinghouse reports, billing histories, and explanation of benefits. The document advises obtaining information like when the claim was received, the timely filing limit, acceptable proof types, appeal details, and contact information when a claim is denied for late filing.
This document is a health insurance claim form for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois. It provides instructions for completing the form to submit a claim for health insurance reimbursement. It notes that providing false information is fraudulent. It requests information about the patient, primary policy holder, and any other applicable insurance. It also provides examples of the type of information and documentation needed for different types of medical bills to ensure proper processing and reimbursement of claims.
The document discusses common issues with duplicate Medicare claim submissions, such as resubmitting paid claims or billing for the same procedure multiple times. It provides tips for avoiding duplicate submissions, including checking the status of original claims before resubmitting, using correct modifiers, and verifying billing guidelines. If a duplicate claim denial occurs, the provider should research previous submissions, fix any errors, and resubmit or appeal with additional documentation.
Payment posting in RCM seems like an afterthought, something that happens after the “real” work of medical billing ends. After all, you’ve done the hard part and got the payments in the door. Payment Posting is the crucial step in the Revenue Cycle Management process.
Dan Wellisch gave this presentation to the Chicago Technology For Vaue Based Healthcare Meetup at https://www.meetup.com/Chicago-Technology-For-Value-Based-Healthcare-Meetup/
Claim denials are costly. Learn the basics of establishing a strong denial management process and strategies to place your focus on denial prevention. Learn to reduce your costs associated with collection on your claims, reduce your days in AR and maintain a healthier Revenue Cycle.
This document provides an overview of the different departments within the revenue cycle management process. It describes the key functions of each department including pre-registration, registration, treatment, medical records, coding, charge entry, claims transmission, payer cash posting, accounts receivables, collections, and quality and compliance. The document explains the purpose and processes involved at each step of the revenue cycle to manage patient information, code procedures, bill for services, obtain payment, and ensure compliance.
Ar scenarios with all the points to be verified and askedJvs Prasad
The document outlines various scenarios that may occur with an insurance claim and the relevant information needed for each scenario. These include claim not on file, claim in process, claim forwarded to payer, claim paid, claim paid to wrong address, claim denied for reasons such as untimely filing, eligibility, non-covered services, and more. For each scenario, it provides questions to ask the insurance representative to obtain important details like denial date, payment amount, correct procedures and codes, and requests for explanation of benefits forms.
This document provides an overview of diagnosis codes (ICD-10-CM), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and how to handle denials related to invalid or missing codes. It discusses the history and purpose of diagnosis codes, how CPT codes are organized and updated annually, and steps to take if a code is found to be incorrect, such as sending to coding for correction or reprocessing a denial.
This document discusses the life cycle of an insurance claim, including:
1) Processing the CMS-1500 claim form by transferring information from medical records. Providers can accept assignment to be reimbursed directly by the insurance company.
2) Managing patients by verifying insurance information, generating encounter forms, and collecting copayments. Primary and secondary insurance is determined.
3) Submitting claims electronically or manually. Claims are processed, adjudicated by comparing to benefits and edits, and then paid or denied with an explanation of benefits sent.
Technomine is an ISO 9001:2008 certified outsourcing company founded in 2008 that provides business process outsourcing services primarily in the healthcare domain, including medical billing, coding, revenue cycle management, and staffing services. They leverage technology, processes, and domain expertise to maximize financial and operational performance for clients. Technomine aims to help clients focus on their core business by taking over non-core activities and ensuring quality, consistent performance and value.
Medical billing outsourcing assists health care entities through it’s revenue cycle management services, thus making the process smoother than ever. Medical billing outsourcing generally from USA improves revenue collection and ensures a smooth and consistent cash flow.
This document discusses various types of denials including inclusive, mutually exclusive, comprehensive and component codes. It provides examples of inclusive coding and defines mutually exclusive procedures that cannot be billed together. It discusses checking CCI edits, commercial websites, and encoder software to determine correct coding. Reasons for denials include missing or incorrect modifiers, downcoding, and billing higher and lower level codes together. Modifiers and their appropriate uses are outlined. Global periods are defined as pre and post-op care periods after a procedure to avoid separate billing.
Accounts Receivable & Denial Management Services - Nursing HomeMichael Smith
Sun Knowledge provides accounts receivable follow-up and denial management services for nursing homes. They utilize a team of skilled staff to conduct claims follow-ups, address denied claims, and work to resolve unpaid balances. Their process involves identifying unpaid claims, determining the reason for non-payment, correcting issues, resubmitting claims, appealing denials, and billing patients when necessary. Some challenges they face include understanding complex billing rules and obtaining needed documentation, but they address these through initiatives like researching exceptions, following up on claims regularly, and checking older claims to identify trends.
Medical necessity (CO 50) will be important denial if your DX is not matching with LCD policy. Know the basic of this denial to improve your medical billing
The document provides an overview of Talisman Solutions Inc, an intelligent solutions company that offers revenue cycle management and medical billing services. It summarizes Talisman's offerings such as complete healthcare solutions, expertise in billing and coding, reasonable costs, and a secure and HIPAA compliant process. It also outlines Talisman's RCM process flow and quality assurance measures to ensure accuracy and maximize collections.
Complete Prior Authorization Services | Prior Authorization Process GuidelineMichael Smith
This document provides an overview of Sun Knowledge, a healthcare BPO/KPO services company. It discusses Sun Knowledge's prior authorization services, highlighting the challenges involved and Sun Knowledge's approaches to addressing them. Sample reports related to prior authorization tracking and performance are also included. The document aims to demonstrate Sun Knowledge's capabilities and compliance in handling prior authorization processes for US healthcare clients.
This document outlines various claim statuses and the relevant information and actions associated with each status. The statuses include claims that are not on file, in process, forwarded to the payer, paid, paid to the wrong address, denied for untimely filing, eligibility, non-covered services, need for a primary EOB, COB, capitation, lack of authorization or referral number, being bundled, incorrect provider, maximum primary payment, wrong diagnosis, modifier issue, pre-existing condition, medical necessity, untimely follow up, duplicate claim, pending additional information, applied to deductible, or paid to the patient.
The document outlines the medical billing flow chart and revenue cycle management system. It involves verifying patient eligibility, coding medical records, entering demographic and charge data, transmitting claims to clearinghouses, receiving explanations of benefits (EOBs), posting payments, and following up on denials to increase collections. Key steps include eligibility checks, coding, data entry, quality audits, transmission, cash posting, and accounts receivable management.
This document discusses timely filing limits and requirements for submitting insurance claims. It notes that insurers each have their own time limit for filing claims, and any claims submitted after the limit will not be paid. It provides examples of acceptable proof of timely filing such as clearinghouse reports, billing histories, and explanation of benefits. The document advises obtaining information like when the claim was received, the timely filing limit, acceptable proof types, appeal details, and contact information when a claim is denied for late filing.
This document is a health insurance claim form for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois. It provides instructions for completing the form to submit a claim for health insurance reimbursement. It notes that providing false information is fraudulent. It requests information about the patient, primary policy holder, and any other applicable insurance. It also provides examples of the type of information and documentation needed for different types of medical bills to ensure proper processing and reimbursement of claims.
The document discusses common issues with duplicate Medicare claim submissions, such as resubmitting paid claims or billing for the same procedure multiple times. It provides tips for avoiding duplicate submissions, including checking the status of original claims before resubmitting, using correct modifiers, and verifying billing guidelines. If a duplicate claim denial occurs, the provider should research previous submissions, fix any errors, and resubmit or appeal with additional documentation.
Payment posting in RCM seems like an afterthought, something that happens after the “real” work of medical billing ends. After all, you’ve done the hard part and got the payments in the door. Payment Posting is the crucial step in the Revenue Cycle Management process.
Dan Wellisch gave this presentation to the Chicago Technology For Vaue Based Healthcare Meetup at https://www.meetup.com/Chicago-Technology-For-Value-Based-Healthcare-Meetup/
Claim denials are costly. Learn the basics of establishing a strong denial management process and strategies to place your focus on denial prevention. Learn to reduce your costs associated with collection on your claims, reduce your days in AR and maintain a healthier Revenue Cycle.
This document provides an overview of the different departments within the revenue cycle management process. It describes the key functions of each department including pre-registration, registration, treatment, medical records, coding, charge entry, claims transmission, payer cash posting, accounts receivables, collections, and quality and compliance. The document explains the purpose and processes involved at each step of the revenue cycle to manage patient information, code procedures, bill for services, obtain payment, and ensure compliance.
Ar scenarios with all the points to be verified and askedJvs Prasad
The document outlines various scenarios that may occur with an insurance claim and the relevant information needed for each scenario. These include claim not on file, claim in process, claim forwarded to payer, claim paid, claim paid to wrong address, claim denied for reasons such as untimely filing, eligibility, non-covered services, and more. For each scenario, it provides questions to ask the insurance representative to obtain important details like denial date, payment amount, correct procedures and codes, and requests for explanation of benefits forms.
This document provides an overview of diagnosis codes (ICD-10-CM), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and how to handle denials related to invalid or missing codes. It discusses the history and purpose of diagnosis codes, how CPT codes are organized and updated annually, and steps to take if a code is found to be incorrect, such as sending to coding for correction or reprocessing a denial.
This document discusses the life cycle of an insurance claim, including:
1) Processing the CMS-1500 claim form by transferring information from medical records. Providers can accept assignment to be reimbursed directly by the insurance company.
2) Managing patients by verifying insurance information, generating encounter forms, and collecting copayments. Primary and secondary insurance is determined.
3) Submitting claims electronically or manually. Claims are processed, adjudicated by comparing to benefits and edits, and then paid or denied with an explanation of benefits sent.
Technomine is an ISO 9001:2008 certified outsourcing company founded in 2008 that provides business process outsourcing services primarily in the healthcare domain, including medical billing, coding, revenue cycle management, and staffing services. They leverage technology, processes, and domain expertise to maximize financial and operational performance for clients. Technomine aims to help clients focus on their core business by taking over non-core activities and ensuring quality, consistent performance and value.
Medical billing outsourcing assists health care entities through it’s revenue cycle management services, thus making the process smoother than ever. Medical billing outsourcing generally from USA improves revenue collection and ensures a smooth and consistent cash flow.
This document discusses various types of denials including inclusive, mutually exclusive, comprehensive and component codes. It provides examples of inclusive coding and defines mutually exclusive procedures that cannot be billed together. It discusses checking CCI edits, commercial websites, and encoder software to determine correct coding. Reasons for denials include missing or incorrect modifiers, downcoding, and billing higher and lower level codes together. Modifiers and their appropriate uses are outlined. Global periods are defined as pre and post-op care periods after a procedure to avoid separate billing.
Accounts Receivable & Denial Management Services - Nursing HomeMichael Smith
Sun Knowledge provides accounts receivable follow-up and denial management services for nursing homes. They utilize a team of skilled staff to conduct claims follow-ups, address denied claims, and work to resolve unpaid balances. Their process involves identifying unpaid claims, determining the reason for non-payment, correcting issues, resubmitting claims, appealing denials, and billing patients when necessary. Some challenges they face include understanding complex billing rules and obtaining needed documentation, but they address these through initiatives like researching exceptions, following up on claims regularly, and checking older claims to identify trends.
Medical necessity (CO 50) will be important denial if your DX is not matching with LCD policy. Know the basic of this denial to improve your medical billing
The document provides an overview of Talisman Solutions Inc, an intelligent solutions company that offers revenue cycle management and medical billing services. It summarizes Talisman's offerings such as complete healthcare solutions, expertise in billing and coding, reasonable costs, and a secure and HIPAA compliant process. It also outlines Talisman's RCM process flow and quality assurance measures to ensure accuracy and maximize collections.
Complete Prior Authorization Services | Prior Authorization Process GuidelineMichael Smith
This document provides an overview of Sun Knowledge, a healthcare BPO/KPO services company. It discusses Sun Knowledge's prior authorization services, highlighting the challenges involved and Sun Knowledge's approaches to addressing them. Sample reports related to prior authorization tracking and performance are also included. The document aims to demonstrate Sun Knowledge's capabilities and compliance in handling prior authorization processes for US healthcare clients.
This document outlines various claim statuses and the relevant information and actions associated with each status. The statuses include claims that are not on file, in process, forwarded to the payer, paid, paid to the wrong address, denied for untimely filing, eligibility, non-covered services, need for a primary EOB, COB, capitation, lack of authorization or referral number, being bundled, incorrect provider, maximum primary payment, wrong diagnosis, modifier issue, pre-existing condition, medical necessity, untimely follow up, duplicate claim, pending additional information, applied to deductible, or paid to the patient.
The document outlines the medical billing flow chart and revenue cycle management system. It involves verifying patient eligibility, coding medical records, entering demographic and charge data, transmitting claims to clearinghouses, receiving explanations of benefits (EOBs), posting payments, and following up on denials to increase collections. Key steps include eligibility checks, coding, data entry, quality audits, transmission, cash posting, and accounts receivable management.
This medical billing flow chart outlines the process from a patient visit to a provider's front office to insurance billing and payment. It shows that the billing office handles converting visit details to insurance formats, submitting claims to insurance companies, and following up on payments or denials with cash posting and accounts receivable management. Key steps include preliminary screening of visits, dispatching to a clearing house, and claim adjudication by insurance companies.
The document discusses key aspects of the revenue cycle for hospital and physician billing. It covers common billing acronyms and forms, the steps in the revenue cycle including scheduling, registration, charge capture, billing, follow up, and common denials. It provides explanations of registration, coding, billing edits, payment calculations, claim submission and the collection process.
The document discusses the process of submitting, processing, adjudicating, and paying health insurance claims. It begins by outlining the benefits of electronic claims submission over manual submission, such as lower processing costs and fewer errors. It then provides a seven-step overview of how health insurers typically process electronic claims, including determining eligibility, applying pricing edits, adjudicating the claim, generating explanations of benefits, and sending payment. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of reviewing health insurer contracts and auditing claims to appeal inappropriately paid or denied claims.
This document provides an overview of medical billing in the United States. It describes the process where a doctor provides services to a patient, submits a claim to an insurance company, and the insurance company reviews the claim and sends payment to the provider. It outlines the steps involved, including coding the diagnosis and treatment, submitting claims electronically or by mail, following up on denied claims or underpayments, and generating monthly reports.
Top 10 billing specialist interview questions and answersAndrewGarfield999
The document provides resources for billing specialist interview preparation, including common interview questions, examples of different types of interviews, and tips. It includes links to ebooks on popular interview questions and secrets to winning interviews. Sample questions cover why the applicant wants the job, challenges they have faced, and why the company should hire them. The document aims to equip job seekers with comprehensive guidance for billing specialist interviews.
This presentation discusses revenue cycle management services including appointment scheduling, patient enrollment, eligibility verification, pre-certification, medical coding, billing, claims submission, payment posting, accounts receivable management, denial management, medical transcription, and document management. The presentation emphasizes accurate and timely processing to maximize reimbursements and improve cash flow. Services are provided using experienced staff and secure technology to efficiently handle the revenue cycle for healthcare practices.
Trans-quest is a Healthcare Solutions provider..with a key focus on Revenue Cycle Management services for Physician Groups with a special emphasis on AR & Denial Management. Besides, Trans-quest has medical transcription capabilities and have been servicing various Group Physicians ranging from Multi Specialty, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Oncology etc.
Physician Billing Services (PBS) provides revenue cycle management services such as medical billing, coding, and collections to healthcare providers. It aims to partner with consulting groups to expand its client base. As a partner, a consulting group would refer clients to PBS for revenue cycle services, earn commissions, and have PBS support its sales efforts. To partner with PBS, a group would need to promote PBS's services and provide client referrals.
The document defines revenue cycle management and its key components. It begins by providing the Healthcare Financial Management Association's definition of revenue cycle as encompassing all administrative and clinical functions from creating a patient account through payment collection. It describes revenue cycle processes as interdependent and notes that early errors can significantly impact revenue recovery costs. The rest of the document provides more details on the various components and goals of revenue cycle management.
Denials Management Made Easy By Forefront Technologies
Healthcare Software Solutions. Turn your ERAs into actionable charts and reports. Forefront’s ETL process makes it easy to load your files for reporting. It has all the visualizations you need to easily identify problem areas and trends, with click-throughs and drill-downs to get right to the details.
The document provides an overview of Talisman Solutions Inc, an intelligent solutions company that offers revenue cycle management and medical billing services. It summarizes Talisman's offerings such as complete healthcare solutions, expertise in billing and coding, reasonable costs, and a secure and HIPAA compliant process. It also outlines Talisman's RCM process flow and quality assurance measures to ensure accuracy and maximize collections.
BCBSM will implement changes to how it maps proprietary non-payment codes to standard codes beginning in August 2009. The changes were made based on provider feedback and are intended to improve the quality of 835 remittance reports. Three documents listing the new mappings are available on BCBSM's website until August 31. Providers should share this information with relevant staff and notify BCBSM of any questions or concerns regarding the revised mappings.
This document provides an overview and instructions for electronic medical billing and payment within California's workers' compensation system. It adopts national electronic billing standards established under HIPAA, and supplements them with California-specific rules. The guide explains requirements for submitting bills electronically using standard formats like the 837, and for electronic remittance advice and acknowledgments. It also covers transaction identification numbers, code sets, roles of participants, and requirements for duplicate/corrected/appeal submissions and documentation attachments.
This document lists modifiers that affect payment for medical procedures. It includes CPT and HCPCS modifiers and describes how payment is determined when each modifier is used, such as paying 150% of the fee for bilateral procedures (-50) or 100% of the fee for unrelated E/M services (-24). Local modifiers are also provided, such as -1S for surgical dressings supplied for home use.
Radiology Part B Billing for Hospital and SNF PatientsJessica Parker
Acceptable HCPCS codes for radiology and other diagnostic services are taken primarily from the CPT-4 portion of HCPCS. Payment is the lower of the charge or the Medicare physician fee schedule amount.
The 2020 OPPS Final Rule makes several changes to Medicare reimbursement rates and policies for hospital outpatient departments. Key changes include a 2.6% increase in OPPS payment rates, removal of some procedures from the inpatient only list, changes to device pass-through payments and 340B drug payments, and the adoption of a new quality measure for ambulatory surgical centers. The rule also implements prior authorization for certain frequently furnished clinic visit services to control unnecessary volume increases.
A Practical Assessment of CMS’s Changes to Provider-Based ReimbursementPolsinelli PC
Last November Congress and the President passed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Act). Section 603 of that Act imposed sweeping changes that virtually shut down the development and implementation of new off-campus provider-based hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) overnight. To implement Section 603 of the Act, CMS proposed significant changes to Medicare’s payment rules for services furnished by off-campus provider-based HOPDs. These proposals were included as part of the proposed CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (HOPPS) released on July 6, 2016. Several of CMS’s proposals resulted in significant pushback by health care providers as CMS received more than 2,500 comments in response to its proposals.
On November 1, 2016, CMS issued its highly anticipated CY 2017 HOPPS Final Rule implementing Section 603 the Act. While reimbursement reductions for new off-campus departments are inevitable, CMS did find some common ground with providers.
The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMS Innovation Center) hosted the first of two webinars on November 19 to describe the final rule and respond to questions about the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model.
- - -
CMS Innovation Center
http://innovation.cms.gov
We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy:
http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html
CMS Privacy Policy
http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing: Leveraging Analytics for HVBP Prospective Pa...Perficient, Inc.
This document provides an overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program, including the timeline, measures, and calculation methodology. It discusses how HVBP rewards hospitals with incentive payments based on performance on clinical process, patient experience, outcome, and efficiency measures. The presentation agenda outlines covering HVBP overview, calculation, a demonstration of an analytics application, and Q&A. Eligible hospitals are acute care hospitals paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System, excluding those with deficiencies posing immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety.
“Grievances or complaint” includes any communication that expresses dissatisfaction, in respect of the conduct or any act of omission or commission or deficiency of service on the part of an intermediary under NPS. For more information : https://nps.karvy.com/grievanceredressal.aspx
Addressing Medical Necessity Denials and RecoupmentsPYA, P.C.
With increased denials and recoupments related to medical necessity at the forefront of discussions at this year’s American Health Lawyers Association Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues, PYA was prepared to inform and assist providers instituting best practices to address medical necessity denials. PYA Principal Denise Hall-Gaulin co-presented “Medical Status-Current Status/Key Best Practices in Prevention of Medical Necessity Denials and Recoupments” with Michael Spake, VP of External Affairs and Chief Compliance and Integrity Officer at Lakeland Regional Health.
The presentation included:
A discussion of medical necessity—what it means and what it affects
Information regarding medical necessity determinations and criteria for determination
Definitions for categorically excluded services
Criteria for admission (skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities included)
Medical Necessity-- What it Means and 2018 UpdatePYA, P.C.
This presentation addresses the concerns for instituting best practices in tackling medical necessity denials. Including what it means and what it affects, an update on 2018 CMS medical necessity determinations and new initiatives, and details regarding the types of, and criteria for, medical necessity determinations. Admission criteria for skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities, as well as the use of Advanced Beneficiary Notification and Hospital-Issued Notice of Non-Coverage (including the outcomes and penalties for not using ABNs or HINNs) are also discussed.
The revenue cycle consists of pre-claims submission activities, claims processing, accounts receivable, and claims reconciliation and collections. It begins when a patient presents for care and ends after payment or collection of outstanding balances. Key steps include collecting patient information, capturing charges and coding services, submitting claims to payers, receiving explanations of benefits and payments, and collecting remaining patient balances. Accurately following this process and monitoring key performance indicators is important for revenue cycle management.
Back to the Future... Will CMS' Proposed Provider-Based Rules Reshape the Fut...Polsinelli PC
Polsinelli's Reimbursement Institute presents a special 2-part webinar series, in which it will provide an in-depth analysis of the provider-based changes enacted in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Act) and CMS' proposed rules implementing those changes. Virtually overnight, Section 603 of that Act imposed sweeping changes that effectively shut down the development and implementation of new off-campus provider-based hospital outpatient departments.
To implement Section 603, CMS is issuing changes to Medicare's provider-based regulations as part of the CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System proposed rule – the first such changes since 2003. This webinar will review the newly proposed regulatory changes, address the practical implications of the proposed rule, and present ideas on how to operationalize CMS's proposals, should they be finalized. This webinar will also highlight potential comment areas that stakeholders should consider.
This document provides an overview of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program. It discusses the four models of BPCI and the criteria for participating. Key points include:
- The BPCI program aims to reduce costs and improve quality through bundled payments for episodes of care.
- Providers can participate in one of four models, with varying levels of financial risk and responsibility for episodes of care.
- Engagement opportunities exist for physicians, hospitals, post-acute care providers, and other organizations through a facilitator or risk-bearing role.
Rural Urgent Care Centers Business PlanI. Executive Summary.docxanhlodge
Rural Urgent Care Centers Business Plan
I. Executive Summary
II. Program Overview
Location
Services
Other Professional Offerings
Facility
Operating Model
III. Market Profile
Market Overview
Demand Forecasting
IV. Financial Analysis
Pro-Forma Income Statement for UCC
(A “Week 11 Business Plan Excel Template” has been provided in the assignment instructions and in the Learning Resources).
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Visits4,8825,1265,3825,6525,934
Revenue Per Visit$450$450$450$450$450
Gross Revenue
Patient Reveue
Gross Patient Revenue
Deductions from Patient Revenue
Contractual
Total Deductions from Revenue
Net Patient Revenue$0$0$0$0$0
Operating Expenses
Salaries and Wages
Employee Benefits
Utilities
Repair/Maintenance
Housekeeping
Telephone Service
Depreciation
Malpractice
Miscellaneous/Other
Variable Medical Supply Costs
Other Non-Personnel Costs
Total Operating Expenses
Excess of Rev over Exp. From Operations$0$0$0$0$0
Cummulative Income$0$0$0$0$0
Net Cash from Excess Rev (excl Depreciation)$0$0$0$0$0
Cummulative Income Net Cash$0$0$0$0$0
Pro Forma Income Statement
2
Executive Summary, Overview, and Financial Data for Investment
in the Rural Urgent Care Center
I. Executive Summary
Urgent care is the delivery of ambulatory care in a facility dedicated to the delivery of unscheduled, walk-in care outside of a hospital emergency department. Development of the Rural Urgent Care (RUC) facility in Sylacauga, Alabama will facilitate access to care providers through extended service hours within closer geographic proximity to patients, families, and caregivers. The Director of Emergency Services will provide clinical monitoring to ensure quality service provisions. The RUC facility will act to alleviate demand for emergency department (ED) services by shifting lower acute patients to a less resource-intensive environment.
II. Program Overview: Market Opportunities and Utilization Patterns
The RUC will provide treatment to patients suffering from non-life-threatening conditions that require quick attention, including bone fractures, pneumonia and flu, and minor lacerations. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, hospitals have looked to facilities such as RUCs as a means to reduce rates of inappropriate ED utilization by triaging non-emergent patients to less acute settings. The ED is not the most appropriate care setting for many patients. Non-urgent patients account for well over 10 percent of the average ED’s caseload, and semi-urgent cases account for another 20 percent (refer to Figure 1)
. At the other end of the acuity spectrum, most emergent patients would be better served in an inpatient unit, but many are forced to board in the ED because beds are unavailable.
Year4,8825,1265,3825,6525,934
Month407427449471495
Week9499104109114
Day1314151616
Visit volume will increase by 5% each year
Service AreaVisitsYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Figure 1
Triaging patients to an appropriate site of care.
This slideshow is intended to use as an inservice for IRF Staff, Liaisons & Tool Coordinators so they can better understand the intricasies of the Rehab Service Line, its history & present training needs.
This document discusses differences between the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) reimbursement methodologies. OPPS pays hospitals set amounts for outpatient services based on Ambulatory Payment Classifications, while HSCRC pays per unit of service defined by the commission. Some OPPS guidance on coding and billing applies to Maryland hospitals, like status indicators, but OPPS bundling and payment rules do not. The presentation emphasizes the importance of accurate charge description masters for Maryland hospitals to comply with HSCRC expectations around coding, billing units of service, and annual charge master reviews.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits. It outlines the history of the RAC program, the audit process, potential targets like coding issues, and the 5-level appeals process. Agencies are advised to evaluate quarterly coding audits, ensure coding specificity, and prepare documentation in case of an audit or appeal. The appeals process involves redetermination, reconsideration, administrative law judge hearing, appeals council review, and potential judicial review, with various deadlines and requirements at each stage.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits, including identifying high risk areas like therapy thresholds, reviewing documentation practices, and establishing an internal RAC response team to handle medical record requests and appeals. It also outlines the RAC review and appeal processes and provides tips for submitting supporting information to improve the chances of a favorable decision.
The Latest Change for the CMS CoPs and New Regulations: Standing Orders, Orde...AudioEducator
This document summarizes updates to the Conditions of Participation (CoPs) for hospitals from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). It discusses two Federal Register entries from 2012 and 2014 that modified the Code of Federal Regulations and State Operations Manual relating to various hospital CoPs. The 2012 update addressed topics like standing orders, medical staff leadership, order authentication, and critical access hospital services. The 2014 update covered additional areas such as radiology services, dietitian privileges, and transplant center reporting. The presentation provides an overview of the regulatory changes finalized in these Federal Register entries and notes that the full presentation with more details can be accessed at a given URL.
2019 inpatient prospective payment system final rule key pointsBESLER
The 2019 Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule has been issued and changes are on the way that can affect your organization’s Medicare reimbursement.
As part of our commitment to help protect and enhance your Medicare revenue, we’ve developed this expert analysis of the FY 2019 IPPS Final Rule to quickly give you insight into the most important changes.
This document outlines the policies and procedures of MBA Medical Billing Services, Inc. It includes sections on standards of conduct, confidentiality, access to patient information, workstations, the claim generation process, waivers and discounts, standard adjustments, bankruptcy, mail return accounts, bad debt and collections, credit balances, patient rights, access and amendment to health information, use and disclosure of protected health information, de-identification, minimum necessary information, handling of privacy complaints, assessing risk areas, roles as a clearinghouse and business associate, second tier business associates, developing proposals and service agreements, services, responsibilities and fees, interruption of client service, physical security, system logs, contingency planning, and disaster recovery.
This document provides guidelines for best practices in quality assessment of healthcare documentation. It establishes principles of quality such as verifiability, definability, measurability, consistency and integrity. It discusses factors that affect quality like blanks and roles and responsibilities. It covers personnel involved in quality processes like transcriptionists and quality editors. It outlines assessment policies, procedures, error categories and scoring. It emphasizes continuous quality improvement using the Plan-Do-Check-Act model and provides recommendations. The goal is to ensure documentation is accurate, complete and satisfies requirements for high quality patient care.
The document provides an overview of medical billing standards and electronic billing in California workers' compensation. It summarizes the legislative history that mandated electronic billing standards, the development process involving stakeholders, and the final regulations. Key aspects of the standards include requirements for complete bills, timeframes for payment/denial of electronically submitted bills, penalties for non-compliance, and the use of standard forms and transactions such as the 837 and 835. National standards were incorporated to ensure consistency.
This document lists modifiers that affect payment for medical procedures. It includes CPT and HCPCS modifiers and describes how payment is determined when each modifier is used, such as paying 150% of the fee for bilateral procedures (-50) or 100% of the fee for unrelated E/M services (-24). Local modifiers are also provided, such as -1S for surgical dressings for home use.
This document outlines a sample claims management process for a physician practice with 14 steps. The process begins with patient registration, verification of insurance benefits, and check-in. It continues with clinical documentation of services, assigning codes, patient check-out, coding review, pre-authorization if needed, claim generation, claim review, processing by the health insurer, collections if needed, posting payments, appeals if claims are denied, and ends with a glossary. Implementing this detailed process is intended to increase efficiency, submit clean claims, reduce denials, and ensure timely payments from health insurers.
The document discusses a solution from Washington Consulting and EMC for improving healthcare providers' revenue cycle management. The solution aims to streamline billing processes, reduce errors and denials, and improve cash flow. It leverages EMC's Documentum xCP platform to automate workflows and integrate content across systems. Key benefits include expediting content development, decreasing administrative costs, and empowering managers to allocate resources more efficiently. The solution provides a comprehensive approach to managing accounts receivable from start to finish.
This document summarizes assessment data for customers A, B, C, and D. It provides status charts showing totals billed, paid, and pending amounts. Pending amounts are broken down by category with percentages. Actions taken to address issues are also noted, such as sending emails and receiving feedback. Customer D had a significant issue with 43 missing surgery charge sheets totaling around $18,840. Feedback has been received which is expected to resolve pending amounts within a week.
The document appears to be a series of 41 pages from the website www.kalvisolai.com. Each page is numbered sequentially, with the last page being labeled as page 41 of 41. Between some of the pages are notes indicating the class or subject being covered, such as "7th" and "8th". However, most of the content of the individual pages is not provided.
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf46adnanshahzad
How to Start Up a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide Starting a company is an exciting adventure that combines creativity, strategy, and hard work. It can seem overwhelming at first, but with the right guidance, anyone can transform a great idea into a successful business. Let's dive into how to start up a company, from the initial spark of an idea to securing funding and launching your startup.
Introduction
Have you ever dreamed of turning your innovative idea into a thriving business? Starting a company involves numerous steps and decisions, but don't worry—we're here to help. Whether you're exploring how to start a startup company or wondering how to start up a small business, this guide will walk you through the process, step by step.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...Neil Horowitz
On episode 272 of the Digital and Social Media Sports Podcast, Neil chatted with Brian Fitzsimmons, Director of Licensing and Business Development for Barstool Sports.
What follows is a collection of snippets from the podcast. To hear the full interview and more, check out the podcast on all podcast platforms and at www.dsmsports.net
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024SEOSMMEARTH
Buy Verified Payoneer Account: Quick and Secure Way to Receive Payments
Buy Verified Payoneer Account With 100% secure documents, [ USA, UK, CA ]. Are you looking for a reliable and safe way to receive payments online? Then you need buy verified Payoneer account ! Payoneer is a global payment platform that allows businesses and individuals to send and receive money in over 200 countries.
If You Want To More Information just Contact Now:
Skype: SEOSMMEARTH
Telegram: @seosmmearth
Gmail: seosmmearth@gmail.com
The Genesis of BriansClub.cm Famous Dark WEb PlatformSabaaSudozai
BriansClub.cm, a famous platform on the dark web, has become one of the most infamous carding marketplaces, specializing in the sale of stolen credit card data.
Zodiac Signs and Food Preferences_ What Your Sign Says About Your Tastemy Pandit
Know what your zodiac sign says about your taste in food! Explore how the 12 zodiac signs influence your culinary preferences with insights from MyPandit. Dive into astrology and flavors!
Digital Marketing with a Focus on Sustainabilitysssourabhsharma
Digital Marketing best practices including influencer marketing, content creators, and omnichannel marketing for Sustainable Brands at the Sustainable Cosmetics Summit 2024 in New York
Anny Serafina Love - Letter of Recommendation by Kellen Harkins, MS.AnnySerafinaLove
This letter, written by Kellen Harkins, Course Director at Full Sail University, commends Anny Love's exemplary performance in the Video Sharing Platforms class. It highlights her dedication, willingness to challenge herself, and exceptional skills in production, editing, and marketing across various video platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram.
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdfMJ Global
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
How to Implement a Real Estate CRM SoftwareSalesTown
To implement a CRM for real estate, set clear goals, choose a CRM with key real estate features, and customize it to your needs. Migrate your data, train your team, and use automation to save time. Monitor performance, ensure data security, and use the CRM to enhance marketing. Regularly check its effectiveness to improve your business.
Top mailing list providers in the USA.pptxJeremyPeirce1
Discover the top mailing list providers in the USA, offering targeted lists, segmentation, and analytics to optimize your marketing campaigns and drive engagement.
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This presentation is a curated compilation of PowerPoint diagrams and templates designed to illustrate 20 different digital transformation frameworks and models. These frameworks are based on recent industry trends and best practices, ensuring that the content remains relevant and up-to-date.
Key highlights include Microsoft's Digital Transformation Framework, which focuses on driving innovation and efficiency, and McKinsey's Ten Guiding Principles, which provide strategic insights for successful digital transformation. Additionally, Forrester's framework emphasizes enhancing customer experiences and modernizing IT infrastructure, while IDC's MaturityScape helps assess and develop organizational digital maturity. MIT's framework explores cutting-edge strategies for achieving digital success.
These materials are perfect for enhancing your business or classroom presentations, offering visual aids to supplement your insights. Please note that while comprehensive, these slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be complete for standalone instructional purposes.
Frameworks/Models included:
Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
McKinsey’s Ten Guiding Principles of Digital Transformation
Forrester’s Digital Transformation Framework
IDC’s Digital Transformation MaturityScape
MIT’s Digital Transformation Framework
Gartner’s Digital Transformation Framework
Accenture’s Digital Strategy & Enterprise Frameworks
Deloitte’s Digital Industrial Transformation Framework
Capgemini’s Digital Transformation Framework
PwC’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cisco’s Digital Transformation Framework
Cognizant’s Digital Transformation Framework
DXC Technology’s Digital Transformation Framework
The BCG Strategy Palette
McKinsey’s Digital Transformation Framework
Digital Transformation Compass
Four Levels of Digital Maturity
Design Thinking Framework
Business Model Canvas
Customer Journey Map
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
1. Medicare Claims Processing Manual
Chapter 3 - Inpatient Hospital Billing
Table of Contents
(Rev. 2654, 02-08-13)
Transmittals for Chapter 3
10 - General Inpatient Requirements
10.1 - Forms
10.2 - Focused Medical Review (FMR)
10.3 - Spell of Illness
10.4 - Payment of Nonphysician Services for Inpatients
10.5 - Hospital Inpatient Bundling
20 - Payment Under Prospective Payment System (PPS) Diagnosis Related Groups
(DRGs)
20.1 - Hospital Operating Payments Under PPS
20.1.1 - Hospital Wage Index
20.1.2 - Outliers
20.1.2.1 - Cost to Charge Ratios
20.1.2.2 - Statewide Average Cost to Charge Ratios
20.1.2.3 - Threshold and Marginal Cost
20.1.2.4 - Transfers
20.1.2.5 - Reconciliation
20.1.2.6 - Time Value of Money
20.1.2.7 - Procedure for Medicare contractors to Perform and
Record Outlier Reconciliation Adjustments
20.1.2.8 - Specific Outlier Payments for Burn Cases
20.1.2.9 - Medical Review and Adjustments
20.1.2.10 - Return Codes for Pricer
20.2 - Computer Programs Used to Support Prospective Payment System
20.2.1 - Medicare Code Editor (MCE)
20.2.1.1 - Paying Claims Outside of the MCE
20.2.1.1.1 - Requesting to Pay Claims Without MCE Approval
2. 20.2.1.1.2 - Procedures for Paying Claims Without Passing through
the MCE
20.2.2 - DRG GROUPER Program
20.2.3 - PPS Pricer Program
20.2.3.1 - Provider-Specific File
20.3 - Additional Payment Amounts for Hospitals with Disproportionate Share of
Low-Income Patients
20.3.1 - Clarification of Allowable Medicaid Days in the Medicare
Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Adjustment Calculation
20.3.1.1 - Clarification for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning On or
After January 1, 2000
20.3.1.2 - Hold Harmless for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning
Before January 1, 2000
20.3.1.3 – Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Policy Changes
Effective for Cost Reporting Periods beginning on or after October
1, 2009
20.3.1.4 – Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Policy Changes
Effective for Cost Reporting Periods beginning on or after October
1, 2012
20.3.2 - Updates to the Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
20.3.2.1 - Inpatient Hospital Payments and Disproportionate Share
Hospital (DSH) Thresholds and Adjustments
20.3.3 – Prospective Payment Changes for Fiscal Year (FY) 2003
20.3.4 - Prospective Payment Changes for Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 and
Beyond
20.4 - Hospital Capital Payments Under PPS
20.4.1 - Federal Rate
20.4.2 - Hold Harmless Payments
20.4.3 - Blended Payments
20.4.4 - Capital Payments in Puerto Rico
20.4.5 - Old and New Capital
20.4.6 - New Hospitals
20.4.7 - Capital PPS Exception Payments
20.4.8 - Capital Outliers
20.4.9 - Admission Prior to and Discharge After Capital PPS
Implementation Date
3. 20.4.10 - Market Basket Update
20.5 - Rural Referral Centers (RRCs)
20.6 - Criteria and Payment for Sole Community Hospitals and for Medicare
Dependent Hospitals
20.7 - Billing Applicable to PPS
20.7.1- Stays Prior to and Discharge After IPPS Implementation Date
20.7.2 - Split Bills
20.7.3 - Payment for Blood Clotting Factor Administered to Hemophilia
Inpatients
20.7.4 - Cost Outlier Bills With Benefits Exhausted
20.8 - Payment to Hospitals and Units Excluded from IPPS for Direct Graduate
Medical Education (DGME) and Nursing and Allied Health (N&AH) Education
for Medicare Advantage (MA) Enrollees
30 - Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program and Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)
30.1 - Requirements for CAH Services, CAH Skilled Nursing Care Services and
Distinct Part Units
30.1.1 - Payment for Inpatient Services Furnished by a CAH
30.1.1.1 – Payment for Inpatient Services Furnished by an Indian
Health Service (IHS) or tribal CAH
30.1.2 - Payment for Post-Hospital SNF Care Furnished by a CAH
30.1.3 - Costs of Emergency Room On-Call Providers
30.1.4 - Costs of Ambulance Services
40 - Billing Coverage and Utilization Rules for PPS and Non-PPS Hospitals
40.1 - "Day Count" Rules for All Providers
40.2 - Determining Covered/Noncovered Days and Charges
40.2.1 - Noncovered Admission Followed by Covered Level of Care
40.2.2 - Charges to Beneficiaries for Part A Services
40.2.3 - Determining Covered and Noncovered Charges - Pricer and PS&R
40.2.4 – IPPS Transfers Between Hospitals
40.2.5 - Repeat Admissions
40.2.6 - Leave of Absence
40.3 - Outpatient Services Treated as Inpatient Services
40.3.1 - Billing Procedures to Avoid Duplicate Payments
50 - Adjustment Bills
4. 50.1 - Tolerance Guidelines for Submitting Adjustment Requests
50.2 - Claim Change Reasons
50.3 - Late Charges
60 - Swing-Bed Services
70 - All-Inclusive Rate Providers
70.1 - Providers Using All-Inclusive Rates for Inpatient Part A Charges
80 - Hospitals That Do Not Charge
80.1 - Medicare Summary Notice (MSN) for Services in Hospitals That Do Not
Charge
90 - Billing Transplant Services
90.1 - Kidney Transplant - General
90.1.1 - The Standard Kidney Acquisition Charge
90.1.2 - Billing for Kidney Transplant and Acquisition Services
90.1.3 - Billing for Donor Post-Kidney Transplant Complication Services
90.2 - Heart Transplants
90.2.1 - Artificial Hearts and Related Devices
90.3 - Stem Cell Transplantation
90.3.1 - Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
90.3.2 - Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (AuSCT)
90.3.3 - Billing for Stem Cell Transplantation
90.4 - Liver Transplants
90.4.1 - Standard Liver Acquisition Charge
90.4.2 - Billing for Liver Transplant and Acquisition Services
90.5 - Pancreas Transplants With Kidney Transplants
90.5.1 - Pancreas Transplants Alone (PA)
90.6 - Intestinal and Multi-Visceral Transplants
100 - Billing Instructions for Specific Situations
100.1 - Billing for Abortion Services
100.2 - Payment for CRNA or AA Services
100.3 - Resident and Interns Not Under Approved Teaching Programs
100.4 - Billing for Services After Termination of Provider Agreement
100.4.1 - Billing Procedures for a Provider Assigned Multiple Provider
Numbers or a Change in Provider Number
5. 100.5 - Review of Hospital Admissions of Patients Who Have Elected Hospice
Care
100.6 - Inpatient Renal Services
100.7 - Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
100.8 – Replaced Devices Offered Without Cost or With a Credit
110 - Emergency and Foreign Hospital Services
110.1 - Services Rendered in Nonparticipating Providers
110.2 - Establishing an Emergency
110.3 - Qualifications of an Emergency Services Hospital
110.4 - Claims from Hospital-Leased Laboratories Not Meeting Conditions of
Participation
110.5 - Coverage Requirements for Emergency Hospital Services in Foreign
Countries
110.6 - Services Furnished in a Foreign Hospital Nearest to Beneficiary's U.S.
Residence
110.7 - Coverage of Physician and Ambulance Services Furnished Outside U.S.
110.8 - Claims for Services Furnished in Canada to Qualified Railroad Retirement
Beneficiaries
110.9 - Nonemergency Part B Medical and Other Health Services
110.11 - Elections to Bill for Services Rendered Nonparticipating Hospitals
110.12 - Processing Claims
110.12.1 - Accessibility Criteria
110.12.2 - Medical Necessity
110.12.3 - Time Limitation on Emergency and Foreign Claims
110.13 - Appeals on Claims for Emergency and Foreign Services
120 - Payment for Services Received in Nonparticipating Providers
120.1 - Payment for Services from Foreign Hospitals
120.1.1 - Attending Physician's Statement and Documentation of Medicare
Emergency
120.2 - Designated Contractors
120.3 - Model Letters, Nonparticipating Hospital and Emergency Claims
120.3.1 - Model Letter to Nonparticipating Hospital That Elected to Bill
For Current Year
120.3.2 - Model Letter to Nonparticipating Hospital That Did Not Elect to
Bill for Current Year
6. 120.3.3 - Model Letter to Nonparticipating Hospital That Requests to Bill
the Program
120.3.4 - Full Denial - Hospital-Filed or Beneficiary-Filed Emergency
Claim
120.3.5 - Partial Denial - Hospital-Filed or Beneficiary-Filed Emergency
Claim
120.3.6 - Denial - Military Personnel/Eligible Dependents
120.3.7 - Full Denial - Shipboard Claim - Beneficiary filed
120.3.8 - Full Denial - Foreign Claim - Beneficiary Filed
130 - Coordination With the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO)
140 - Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System (IRF PPS)
140.1 - Medicare IRF Classification Requirements
140.1.1 - Criteria That Must Be Met By Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
140.1.2 - Additional Criteria That Must Be Met By Inpatient Rehabilitation
Units
140.1.3 - Verification Process Used to Determine if the Inpatient
Rehabilitation Facility Met the Classification Criteria
140.1.4 - New IRFs
140.1.5 - Changes in the Status of an IRF Unit
140.1.6 - New IRF Beds
140.1.7 - Change of Ownership or Leasing
140.1.8 - Mergers
140.1.9 – Retroactive Adjustments For Provisionally Excluded IRFs or IRF
Beds
140.2 - Payment Provisions Under IRF PPS
140.2.1 - Phase-In Implementation
140.2.2 - Payment Adjustment Factors and Rates
140.2.3 - Case-Mix Groups
140.2.4 - Case-Level Adjustments
140.2.5 - Facility-Level Adjustments
140.2.5.1 - Area Wage Adjustments
140.2.5.2 - Rural Adjustment
140.2.5.3 – Low-Income Patient (LIP) Adjustment: The
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)/Medicare Beneficiary Data for
7. Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) Paid Under the Prospective
Payment System (PPS)
140.2.5.4 - Teaching Status Adjustment
140.2.5.4.1 - FTE Resident Cap
140.2.5.5 – Outliers
140.2.6 - Cost-to-Charge Ratios
140.2.7- Use of a National Average Cost-to-Charge Ratio
140.2.8- Reconciling Outlier Payments for IRF
140.2.9-Time Value of Money
140.2.10 - Procedure for Medicare Contractors to Perform and Record
Outlier Reconciliation Adjustments for IRFs
140.3 - Billing Requirements Under IRF PPS
140.3.1 - Shared Systems and CWF Edits
140.3.2 - IRF PPS Pricer Software
140.3.3 - Remittance Advices
140.3.4 - Payment Adjustment for Late Transmission of Patient
Assessment Data
150 - Long Term Care Hospitals (LTCHs) PPS
150.1 - Background
150.2 - Statutory Requirements
150.3 - Affected Medicare Providers
150.4 - Revision of the Qualification Criterion for LTCHs
150.5 - Payment Provisions Under LTCH PPS
150.5.1 - Budget Neutrality
150.5.2 - Budget Neutrality Offset
150.6 - Beneficiary Liability
150.7 - Patient Classification System
150.8 - Relative Weights
150.9 - Payment Rate
150.9.1 - Case-Level Adjustments
150.9.1.1 - Short-Stay Outliers
150.9.1.2 - Interrupted Stays
150.9.1.3 - Payments for Special Cases
8. 150.9.1.4 - Payment Policy for Co-Located Providers
150.9.1.5 - High Cost Outlier Cases
150.10 - Facility-Level Adjustments
150.10.1 - Phase-in Implementation
150.11 - Requirements for Provider Education and Training
150.12 - Claims Processing and Billing
150.12.1 - Processing Bills Between October 1, 2002, and the
Implementation Date
150.13 - Billing Requirements Under LTCH PPS
150.14 - Stays Prior to and Discharge After PPS Implementation Date
150.14.1-Crossover Patients in New LTCHs
150.15 - System Edits
150.16 - Billing Ancillary Services Under LTCH PPS
150.17 - Benefits Exhausted
150.17.1 – Assumptions for Use in Examples Below
150.17.1.1 - Example 1: Coinsurance Days < Short Stay Outlier
Threshold (30 Day Stay)
150.17.1.2 - Example 2: Coinsurance Days Greater Than or Equal
to Short Stay Outlier Threshold (30 day stay)
150.17.1.3 - Example 3: Coinsurance Days Greater Than or Equal
to Short Stay Outlier Threshold (20 day stay)
150.17.1.4 - Example 4: Only LTR Days < Short Stay Outlier
Threshold (30 day stay)
150.17.1.5 - Example 5: Only LTR Greater Than or Equal to Short
Stay Outlier Threshold (30 day stay)
150.18 - Provider Interim Payment (PIP)
150.19 - Interim Billing
150.20 – FI Benefit Payment Report (IBPR)
150.21 - Remittance Advices (RAs)
150.22 - Medicare Summary Notices (MSNs)
150.23 - LTCH Pricer Software
150.23.1 - Inputs/Outputs to Pricer
150.24 - Determining the Cost-to-Charge Ratio
150.25 - Statewide Average Cost-to-Charge Ratios
9. 150.26 – Reconciliation
150.27 - Time Value of Money
150.28 Procedure for Medicare contractors to Perform and Record Outlier
Reconciliation Adjustments
160 – Necessary Changes to Implement Special Add-On Payments for New Technologies
160.1 - Special Add-On Payments For New Technologies
160.1.1 - Identifying Claims Eligible for the Add-On Payment for New
Technology
160.1.2 - Remittance Advice Impact
170 - Billing and Processing Instructions for Religious Nonmedical Health Care
Institution (RNHCI) Claims
170.1 - RNHCI Election Process
170.1.1 - Requirement for RNHCI Election
170.1.2 - Revocation of RNHCI Election
170.1.3 - Completion of the Notice of Election for RNHCI
170.1.4 - Common Working File (CWF) Processing of Elections,
Revocations and Cancelled Elections
170.2 - Billing Process for RNHCI Services
170.2.1 - When to Bill for RNHCI Services
170.2.2 - Required Data Elements on Claims for RNHCI Services
170.3 - RNHCI Claims Processing By the Medicare Contractor with RNHCI
Specialty Workload
170.3.1 – RNHCI Claims Not Billed to Original Medicare
170.4 - Informing Beneficiaries of the Results of RNHCI Claims Processing
180 - Processing Claims For Beneficiaries with RNHCI Elections by Contractors without
RNHCI Specialty Workloads
180.1 - Recording Determinations of Excepted/Nonexcepted Care on Claim
Records
180.2 - Informing Beneficiaries of the Results of Excepted/Nonexcepted Care
Determinations by the Non-specialty Contractor
190 - Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System (IPF PPS)
190.1 - Background
190.2 - Statutory Requirements
190.3 - Affected Medicare Providers
190.4 - Federal Per Diem Base Rate
10. 190.4.1 – Standardization Factor
190.4.2 – Budget Neutrality
190.4.2.1 - Budget Neutrality Components
190.4.3 - Annual Update
190.4.4 - Calculating the Federal Payment Rate
190.5 - Patient-Level Adjustments
190.5.1 - Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) Adjustments
190.5.2 - Application of Code First
190.5.3 - Comorbidity Adjustments
190.5.4 - Age Adjustments
190.5.5 - Variable Per Diem Adjustments
190.6 - Facility-Level Adjustments
190.6.1 - Wage Index
190.6.2 - Rural Location Adjustment
190.6.3 - Teaching Status Adjustment
190.6.3.1 - Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Resident Cap
190.6.3.2 - Reconciliation of Teaching Adjustment on Cost Report
190.6.4 - Emergency Department (ED) Adjustment
190.6.4.1 - Source of Admission for IPF PPS Claims for Payment
of ED Adjustment
190.6.5 - Cost-of- Living Adjustment (COLA) for Alaska
and Hawaii
190.7 - Other Payment Policies
190.7.1 - Interrupted Stays
190.7.2 - Outlier Policy
190.7.2.1 - How to Calculate Outlier Payments
190.7.2.2 - Determining the Cost-to-Charge Ratio
190.7.2.3 Outlier Reconciliation
190.7.2.4. Time Value of Money
190.7.2.5 - Procedures for Medicare Contractors to Perform and
Record Outlier Reconciliation Adjustments
190.7.3 - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Payment
190.7.4 - Stop Loss Provision (Transition Period Only)
11. 190.8 - Transition (Phase-In Implementation)
190.8.1 - Implementation Date for Provider
190.9 - Definition of New IPF Providers Versus TEFRA Providers
190.9.1 - New Providers Defined
190.10 - Claims Processing Requirements Under IPF PPS
190.10.1 - General Rules
190.10.2 - Billing Period
190.10.3 - Patient Status Coding
190.10.4 - Reporting ECT Treatments
190.10.5 - Outpatient Services Treated as Inpatient Services
190.10.6 - Patient is a Member of a Medicare Advantage Organization for Only a
Portion of a Billing Period
190.10.7 - Billing for Interrupted Stays
190.10.8 - Grace Days
190.10.9 - Billing Stays Prior to and Discharge After PPS Implementation Date
190.10.10 - Billing Ancillary Services Under IPF PPS
190.10.11 - Covered Costs Not Included in IPF PPS Amount
190.10.12 - Same Day Transfer Claims
190.10.13 - Remittance Advice - Reserved
190.10.14 - Medicare Summary Notices and Explanation of Medicare Benefits
190.11 - Benefit Application and Limits-190 Days
190.12 - Beneficiary Liability
190.12.1 - Benefits Exhaust
190.13 - Periodic Interim Payments (PIP)
190.14 - Intermediary Benefit Payment Report (IBPR)
190.15 - Monitoring Implementation of IPF PPS Through Pulse
190.16 - IPF PPS System Edits
190.17 - IPF PPS PRICER Software
190.17.1 - Inputs/Outputs to PRICER
200 - Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Payments
200.1 - Payment Calculation
200.2 - Submission of Informational Only Bills for Maryland Waiver Hospitals
and Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)
12. Addendum A - Provider Specific File
Appendix A - Verification of Compliance Using ICD-9-CM and Impairment Group Codes
13. 10 - General Inpatient Requirements
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
HO-400, HO-400.G, HO-403, HO-412
The hospital may bill only for services provided. If the provider billing system initiates
billing based on services ordered, the provider must confirm that the service has been
provided before billing either the carrier or intermediary (FI).
The provider agreement to participate in the program requires the provider to submit all
information necessary to support claims for services. Failure to submit such information
in an individual case will result in denial of the entire claim, the charging of utilization in
inpatient cases to the beneficiary record, and a prohibition against the provider billing or
collecting from the beneficiary or other person for any services on the claim. A provider
with a common practice of failing to submit necessary information in connection with its
claims subjects itself to possible termination of its participation in the program. (See
chapter 1.)
State agencies will find that a significant deficiency exists in complying with the
conditions of participation if the hospital repeatedly fails to transfer appropriate medical
information when patients are transferred to other health facilities. Appropriate medical
information includes the discharge summary, the physician's medical orders, and a
summary of departmental medical records. The hospital must obtain the patient's consent
for the release of medical information as soon as the decision to transfer is made, unless a
blanket authorization was obtained at admission.
10.1 - Forms
(Rev. 1472, Issued: 03-06-08, Effective: 05-23-07, Implementation: 04-07-08)
Form CMS-1450, Inpatient and/or Outpatient Billing, or the electronic equivalent, is used
for all provider billing, except for the professional component of physicians services. (See
Chapter 25 for instructions for hospital services and Chapter 26 for instructions for
physician services.)
Providers are responsible for purchasing their own forms. They can be bought as a regular
stock item from many printers as a snap-out set or as a continuous pin-feed form (either
glued on the side or not) and are available as carbonless or with carbon paper. Medicare
accepts them all. The standard form set contains four copies, one page of which is
designed to bill the patient.
Special orders can be made for fewer copies, e.g., one-part for a Medicare hospice
election, three-part excluding patient copy.
A. Form CMS-1490S Patient's Request for Medicare Payment
Only beneficiaries (or their representatives) who complete and file their own claims use
this. Providers have no need for this form.
14. B. Form CMS-1500 Health Insurance Claim Form
HH-424
This is the prescribed form for claims prepared by physicians or suppliers whether or not
the claims are assigned. Institutional providers may use the Form CMS-1500 to bill the
Part B carrier for the professional component of physicians' services where applicable.
Form CMS-1450, is processed by the provider's FI.
10.2 - Focused Medical Review (FMR)
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
HO-419, HH-450, HH-452, HH-462.1
This section has been moved to the Program Integrity Manual, which can be found at the
following Internet address http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/cmsindex.asp.
10.3 - Spell of Illness
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3622
The FI makes spell of illness determinations in accordance with the Medicare Benefit
Policy Manual, Chapter 3, and these special instructions.
A. Beginning a Spell of Illness in Nonparticipating Provider
The noncovered services furnished by a nonparticipating provider can begin a spell of
illness only if the provider is a qualified provider. A qualified provider is a hospital
(including a psychiatric hospital) or an SNF that meets all requirements in the definition of
such an institution even though it may not be participating.
It is most unlikely that a nonparticipating hospital that is not accredited by JCAHO or a
nonparticipating SNF satisfies the conditions of participation, particularly with regard to
utilization review. Therefore, for spell of illness purposes, the FI assumes that
nonparticipating providers are not qualified providers in the absence of evidence to the
contrary. Situations that might constitute such contrary evidence include cases where the
provider recently dropped out of the program or, after a survey by the State agency,
decided not to participate even though the conditions of participation were met. Hospitals
accredited by JCAHO are deemed to meet all requirements except utilization review. For
such a hospital, the FI determines through the RO whether the hospital has a utilization
review plan in effect.
B. Continuing a Spell of Illness
1. Hospital Services
15. For purposes of continuing a spell of illness in a hospital, the hospital in which the stay
occurs need not meet all requirements that are necessary for starting a spell of illness. If
there has been a stay in a hospital that might continue the spell of illness and the FI cannot
ascertain its status, the FI contacts the RO, which maintains a list of all medical facilities
and their status.
2. SNF Services
For purposes of continuing a spell of illness in a SNF the spell of illness ends when the
beneficiary no longer needs or receives a Medicare covered level of care.
The FI uses the following seven presumptions to determine whether the skilled level of
care standards were met during a prior SNF stay. If the information upon which to base a
presumption is not readily available, the FI may, at its discretion, review the beneficiary's
medical records to determine whether the beneficiary was an inpatient of an SNF for
purposes of ending a spell of illness.
These special rules for determining whether a beneficiary in a SNF is an inpatient for
benefit period purposes is applicable in all cases where a prior SNF stay affects benefit
period status, not only when a beneficiary is seeking to continue a benefit period, but also
where it results in the beneficiary starting a new benefit period. If the applicable skilled
level of care standards were met during a prior SNF stay, the spell of illness is continued
with current utilization available to the beneficiary. If the applicable skilled level of care
standards were not met during a prior SNF stay, the spell of illness is not continued. A
new spell of illness restores full utilization and imposes a cash deductible.
Presumptions:
Presumption 1: A beneficiary's care in a SNF met the skilled level of care standards if a
Medicare SNF claim was paid for the care, unless such payment was made under
limitation of liability rules.
Presumption 2: A beneficiary's care in a SNF met the skilled level of care standards if a
SNF claim was paid for the services provided in the SNF under the special Medicare
limitation on liability rules pursuant to placement in a noncertified bed. See Chapter 30.
Presumption 3: A beneficiary's care in a SNF did not meet the skilled level of care
standards if a claim was paid for the services provided in the SNF pursuant to the general
Medicare limitation on liability rules in Chapter 30. (This presumption does not apply to
placement in a noncertified bed. For claims paid under these special provisions, see
Presumption 2.)
Presumption 4: A beneficiary's care in a Medicaid nursing facility (NF) did not meet the
skilled level of care standards if a Medicaid claim for the services provided in the NF was
denied on the grounds that the services received were not at the NF level of care (even if
16. paid under applicable Medicaid administratively necessary days provisions which result in
payment for care not meeting the NF level of care requirements).
Presumption 5: A beneficiary's care in an SNF met the skilled level of care standards if a
Medicare SNF claim for the services provided in the SNF was denied on grounds other
than that the services were not at the skilled level of care.
Presumption 6: A beneficiary's care in an SNF did not meet the skilled level of care
standards if a Medicare claim for the services provided in the SNF was denied on the
grounds that the services were not at the skilled level of care and no limitation of liability
payment was made.
Presumption 7: A beneficiary's care in a SNF did not meet the skilled level of care
standards if no Medicare or Medicaid claim was submitted by the SNF.
Rebuttal of Presumptions
Presumptions 1 through 4 cannot be rebutted. Thus, prior Medicare and Medicaid claim
determinations that necessarily required a level of care determination for the time period
under consideration are binding for purposes of a later benefit period calculation.
Although Presumptions 1 through 4 are not in themselves rebuttable, a beneficiary may
seek to reverse a benefit period determination that was dictated by one of these
presumptions by timely appealing the prior Medicare or Medicaid claim determination
which triggered the presumption.
Presumptions 5 through 7 can be rebutted by beneficiary showings that the level of care
needed or received is other than that which the presumption dictates. Rebuttal showings
are permitted at both FI determination levels under 42 CFR 405, Subpart G (i.e., a rebuttal
showing regarding the status of a prior SNF stay is made at the time that an inpatient claim
is submitted and/or at the reconsideration level). Evaluate rebuttal documentation even if
the presumption being rebutted was triggered by a Medicaid denial. Decisions under
presumptions 5 through 7 require the FI to send a notice to advise the beneficiary of the
basis for the determination and the right to present evidence to rebut the determination on
reconsideration.
Presumption 6 can be rebutted because the Medicare skilled level of care definition for
coverage purposes is broader than the skilled level of care definition used here for benefit
period determinations. For example, prior hospital care related to the SNF care is
included in the Medicare SNF coverage requirements but is not included in the standard
for benefit period determinations. Therefore, Medicare payment could have been denied
for an SNF stay because of noncompliance with that requirement, even though skilled
level of care requirements for benefit period determinations were in fact met by the SNF
stay. Consequently, when Medicare SNF payment is denied, the beneficiary must be
given the opportunity to demonstrate that he/she still needed and received a skilled level
of care for purposes of benefit period determinations to extend a benefit period if this
would be to the beneficiary's advantage.
17. NOTE: Effective October 1, 1990, the levels of care that were previously covered
separately under the Medicaid SNF and intermediate care facility (ICF) benefits are
combined in a single Medicaid nursing facility (NF) benefit. Thus, the Medicaid NF
benefit includes essentially the same type of skilled care covered by Medicare's SNF
benefit, but it includes less intensive care as well. This means that when a person is found
not to require at least a Medicaid NF level of care (as under Presumption 4), it can be
presumed that he or she also does not meet the Medicare skilled level of care standards.
However, since the NF benefit can include care that is less intensive than Medicare SNF
care, merely establishing that a person does require NF level care does not necessarily
mean that he or she also meets the Medicare skilled level of care standards. Determining
whether an individual who requires NF level care also meets the Medicare skilled level of
care standards requires an actual examination of the medical evidence and cannot be
accomplished through the simple use of a presumption.
Medicare no payment bills submitted by an SNF result in Medicare program payment
determinations (i.e., denials). Therefore, such no payment bills trigger the appropriate
presumptions. This also applies in any State where the Medicaid program utilizes no
payment bills which lead to Medicaid program payment determinations. If an SNF
erroneously fails to submit a Medicare claim (albeit a no-pay claim) when Medicare rules
require such submission, request compliance. Once the no-pay bill is submitted and
denied, the applicable presumption (other than presumption 7) is triggered. If a patient is
moving from a SNF level of care to a non-SNF level of care in a facility certified to
provide SNF care, occurrence code 22 (date active care ended) is used to signify the
beginning of the no-pay period on the bill and trigger the appropriate presumptions.
Some of the presumptions require knowledge of Medicaid's claims processing
involvement with the prior claim. The FI uses current bill data, accompanying
documentation, bill history files, and telephone contacts with the prior stay facility and/or
the Medicaid agency to develop the Medicaid aspects. It does not continue Medicaid
development beyond a telephone contact. It concludes its consideration of the
presumption at this point based upon the Medicaid information available.
10.4 - Payment of Nonphysician Services for Inpatients
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
HO-407
All items and nonphysician services furnished to inpatients must be furnished directly by
the hospital or billed through the hospital under arrangements. This provision applies to
all hospitals, regardless of whether they are subject to PPS.
A. Other Medical Items, Supplies, and Services
The following medical items, supplies, and services furnished to inpatients are covered
under Part A. Consequently, they are covered by the prospective payment rate or
reimbursed as reasonable costs under Part A to hospitals excluded from PPS.
18. •
Laboratory services (excluding anatomic pathology services and certain clinical
pathology services);
•
Pacemakers and other prosthetic devices including lenses, and artificial limbs,
knees, and hips;
•
Radiology services including computed tomography (CT) scans furnished to
inpatients by a physician's office, other hospital, or radiology clinic;
•
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) services; and
•
Transportation, including transportation by ambulance, to and from another
hospital or freestanding facility to receive specialized diagnostic or therapeutic
services not available at the facility where the patient is an inpatient.
The hospital must include the cost of these services in the appropriate ancillary service
cost center, i.e., in the cost of the diagnostic or therapeutic service. It must not show them
separately under revenue code 0540.
EXCEPTIONS:
•
Pneumococcal Vaccine - is payable under Part B only and is billed by the hospital
on the Form CMS-1450.
•
Ambulance Service - For purposes of this section "hospital inpatient" means a
beneficiary who has been formally admitted it does not include a beneficiary who
is in the process of being transferred from one hospital to another. Where the
patient is transferred from one hospital to another, and is admitted as an inpatient
to the second, the ambulance service is payable under only Part B. If
transportation is by a hospital owned and operated ambulance, the hospital bills
separately on Form CMS-1450 as appropriate. Similarly, if the hospital arranges
for the ambulance transportation with an ambulance operator, including paying the
ambulance operator, it bills separately. However, if the hospital does not assume
any financial responsibility, the billing is to the carrier by the ambulance operator
or beneficiary, as appropriate, if an ambulance is used for the transportation of a
hospital inpatient to another facility for diagnostic tests or special treatment the
ambulance trip is considered part of the DRG, and not separately billable, if the
resident hospital is under PPS.
•
Part B Inpatient Services - Where Part A benefits are not payable, payment may
be made to the hospital under Part B for certain medical and other health services.
See Chapter 4 for a description of Part B inpatient services.
•
Anesthetist Services "Incident to" Physician Services - If a physician's practice
was to employ anesthetists and to bill on a reasonable charge basis for these
19. services and that practice was in effect as of the last day of the hospital's most
recent 12-month cost reporting period ending before September 30, 1983, the
physician may continue that practice through cost reporting periods beginning
October 1, 1984. However, if the physician chooses to continue this practice, the
hospital may not add costs of the anesthetist’s service to its base period costs for
purposes of its transition payment rates. If it is the existing or new practice of the
physician to employ certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and other
qualified anesthetists and include charges for their services in the physician bills
for anesthesiology services for the hospital's cost report periods beginning on or
after October 1, 1984, and before October 1, 1987, the physician may continue to
do so.
B. Exceptions/Waivers
These provisions were waived before cost reporting periods beginning on or after October
1, 1986, under certain circumstances. The basic criteria for waiver was that services
furnished by outside suppliers are so extensive that a sudden change in billing practices
would threaten the stability of patient care. Specific criteria for waiver and processing
procedures are in §2804 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual (CMS Pub. 15-1).
10.5 – Hospital Inpatient Bundling
(Rev. 668, Issued: 09-02-05; Effective: Ambulance claims received on or after
January 3, 2006, and 4 years after initial determination for adjustments;
Implementation: 01-03-06)
Hospital bundling rules exclude payment to independent suppliers of ambulance services
for beneficiaries in a hospital inpatient stay. The Common Working File (CWF) performs
reject edits to incoming claims from independent suppliers of ambulance services. The
CWF searches paid claim history and compares the line item service date on an ambulance
claim to the admission and discharge dates on a hospital inpatient stay. The CWF rejects
the line item when the ambulance line item service date falls within the admission and
discharge dates on a hospital inpatient claim. Based on CWF rejects, the carrier must deny
line items for ambulance services billed by independent suppliers that should be bundled
to the hospital.
Upon receipt of a hospital inpatient claim, CWF searches paid claim history and compares
the period between the hospital inpatient admission and discharge dates to the line item
service date on an ambulance claim billed by an independent supplier. The CWF shall
generate an unsolicited response when the line item service date falls within the admission
and discharge dates of the hospital inpatient claim.
Upon receipt of the unsolicited response, the carrier shall adjust the ambulance claim and
recoup the payment.
Ambulance services with a date of service that is the same as the admission or discharge
date on an inpatient claim are separately payable and not subject to the bundling rules.
20. The CWF performs an additional edit before determining if the ambulance line item
should be rejected when the beneficiary is an inpatient of a long term care facility
(LTCH), inpatient psychiatric facility (IPF) or inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) and is
transported via ambulance to an acute care hospital to receive specialized services. The
CWF edits the claim for the presence of occurrence span code 74 (non-covered level of
care) and the associated occurrence span code from and through dates. The CWF bypasses
the reject edit when the ambulance line item service date falls within the occurrence span
code 74 from and through dates plus one day. In this case, the ambulance line item is
separately payable. The CWF rejects the ambulance line item when the service date falls
outside the occurrence span code 74 from and through dates plus one day.
20 - Payment Under Prospective Payment System (PPS) Diagnosis
Related Groups (DRGs)
(Rev. 1571; Issued: 08-07-08; Effective Date: 08-01-08; Implementation Date: 0815-08)
A. General
The Social Security Amendments of 1983 (P.L. 98-21) provided for establishment of a
prospective payment system (PPS) for Medicare payment of inpatient hospital services.
(See §20.4 for corresponding information for PPS capital payments and computation of
capital and operating outliers for FY 1992.) Under PPS, hospitals are paid a
predetermined rate per discharge for inpatient hospital services furnished to Medicare
beneficiaries. Each type of Medicare discharge is classified according to a list of DRGs.
These amounts are, with certain exceptions, payment in full to the hospital for inpatient
operating costs. Beneficiary cost-sharing is limited to statutory deductibles, coinsurance,
and payment for noncovered items and services. Section 4003 of OBRA of 1990 (P.L.
101-508) expands the definition of inpatient operating costs to include certain
preadmission services. (See §40.3.)
The statute excludes children's hospitals and cancer hospitals, hospitals located outside the
50 States. In addition to these categorical exclusions, the statute provides other special
exclusions, such as hospitals that are covered under State reimbursement control systems.
These excluded hospitals and units are paid on the basis of reasonable costs subject to the
target rate of increase limits.
In accordance with Section 1814 (b) (3) of the Act, services provided by hospitals in
Maryland subject to the Health Services Cost Review Commission (provider numbers
21000-21099) are paid according to the terms of the waiver, that is 94% of submitted
charges subject to any unmet Part B deductible and coinsurance.
For discharges occurring on or after April 1, 1988, separate standardized payment
amounts are established for large urban areas and rural areas. Large urban areas are urban
areas with populations of more than 1,000,000 as determined by the Secretary of HHS on
the basis of the most recent census population data. In addition, any New England County
21. Metropolitan Area (NECMA) with a population of more than 970,000 is a large urban
area.
The OBRA 1987 required payment of capital costs under PPS effective with cost reporting
periods that began October 1, 1991, or later. A 10-year transition period was provided to
protect hospitals that had incurred capital obligations in excess of the standardized
national rate from major disruption. High capital cost hospitals are known as "hold
harmless" hospitals. The transition period also provides for phase-in of the national
Federal capital payment rate for hospitals with capital obligations that are less than the
national rate. New hospitals that open during the transition period are exempt from capital
PPS payment for their first 2 years of operation. Hospitals and hospital distinct part units
that are excluded from PPS for operating costs are also excluded from PPS for capital
costs.
Capital payments are based on the same DRG designations and weights, outlier
guidelines, geographic classifications, wage indexes, and disproportionate share
percentages that apply to operating payments under PPS. The indirect teaching
adjustment is based on the ratio of residents to average daily census. The hospital split
bill, adjustment bill, waiver of liability and remaining guidelines that have historically
been applied to operating payments also apply to capital payments under PPS.
B. Hospitals and Units Excluded
The following hospitals and distinct part hospital units (DPU) are excluded from PPS and
are paid on a reasonable cost or other basis:
•
Pediatric hospitals whose inpatients are predominately under the age of 18.
Hospitals located outside the 50 States.
• Hospitals participating in a CMS-approved demonstration project or State payment
control system.
•
Nonparticipating hospitals furnishing emergency services have not been affected
by the PPS statute (P.L. 97-21). They are paid under their existing basis.
C. Situations Requiring Special Handling
1. Sole community hospitals are paid in accordance with the methods used to establish
the operating prospective rates for the first year of the PPS transition for operating costs.
The appropriate percentage of hospital-specific rate and the Federal regional rate is
applied by the Pricer program in accordance with the current values for the appropriate
fiscal year.
2. Hospitals have the option to continue to be reimbursed on a reasonable cost basis
subject to the target ceiling rate or to be reimbursed under PPS if the following are met:
22. • Recognized as of April 20, 1983, by the National Cancer Institute as
comprehensive cancer centers or clinical research centers;
• Demonstrating that the entire facility is organized primarily for treatment
of, and research on, cancer; and
• Having a patient population that is at least 50 percent of the hospital's total
discharges with a principal diagnosis of neoplastic disease.
The hospital makes this decision at the beginning of its fiscal year. The choice continues
until the hospital requests a change. If it selects reasonable cost subject to the target
ceiling, it can later request PPS. No further option is allowed.
3. Regional and national referral centers within short-term acute care hospital complexes.
Rural hospitals that meet the criteria have their prospective rate determined on the basis of
the urban, rather than the rural, adjusted standardized amounts, as adjusted by the
applicable DRG weighting factor and the hospital's area wage index.
4. Hospitals in Alaska and Hawaii have the nonlabor related portion of the wage index
adjusted by their appropriate cost-of-living factor. These calculations are made by the
Pricer program and are included in the Federal portion of the rate.
5. Kidney, heart, and liver acquisition costs incurred by approved transplant centers are
treated as an adjustment to the hospital's payments. These payments are adjusted in each
cost reporting period to compensate for the reasonable expenses of the acquisition and are
not included in determining prospective payment.
6. Religious nonmedical health care institutions are paid on the basis of a predetermined
fixed amount per discharge. Payment is based on the historical inpatient operating costs
per discharge and is not calculated by Pricer.
7. Transferring hospitals with discharges assigned to MS-DRG 789 (neonates, died or
transferred to another acute care facility) or MS-DRG 927-935 (burns - transferred to
another acute care facility) have their payments calculated by the Pricer program on the
same basis as those receiving the full prospective payment. They are also eligible for cost
outliers.
8. Nonparticipating hospitals furnishing emergency services are not included in PPS.
9. Veterans Administration (VA) hospitals are generally excluded from participation.
Where payments are made for Medicare patients, the payments are determined in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 5053(d).
10. A hospital that loses its urban area status as a result of the Executive Office of
Management and Budget redesignation occurring after April 20, 1983, may qualify for
23. special consideration by having its rural Federal rate phased-in over a 2-year period. The
hospital will receive, in addition to its rural Federal rate in the first cost reporting period,
two-thirds of the difference between its rural Federal rate and the urban Federal rate that
would have been paid had it retained its urban status. In the second reporting period, onethird of the difference is applied. The adjustment is applied for two successive cost
reporting periods beginning with the cost-reporting period in which CMS recognizes the
reclassification.
11. The payment per discharge under the PPS for hospitals in Puerto Rico is the sum of:
• 50 percent of the Puerto Rico discharge weighted urban or rural
standardized rate.
•
50 percent of the national discharge weighted standardized rate.
(The special treatment of referral centers and sole community hospitals does not apply to
prospective payment hospitals in Puerto Rico.)
There are special criteria that facilities must meet in order to obtain approval for payment
for heart transplants and special processing procedures for these bills. (See §90.2.)
Facilities that wish to obtain coverage of heart transplants for their Medicare patients must
submit an application and documentation showing their initial and ongoing compliance
with the criteria. For facilities that are approved, Medicare covers under Part A all
medically reasonable and necessary inpatient services.
12. Hospitals with high percentage of ESRD discharges may qualify for additional
payment. These payments are handled as adjustments to cost reports.
13. Exception payments are provided for hospitals with inordinately high levels of capital
obligations. They will expire at the end of the 10-year transition period. Exception
payments ensure that for FY 1992 and FY 1993:
•
Sole community hospitals receive 90 percent of Medicare inpatient capital costs:
• Urban hospitals with 100 or more beds and a disproportionate share patient
percentage of at least 20.2 percent receive 80 percent of their Medicare inpatient capital
costs; and
•
All other hospitals receive 70 percent of their Medicare inpatient capital costs.
A limited capital exception payment is also provided during the 10-year capital transition
period for hospitals that experience extraordinary circumstances that require an
unanticipated major capital expenditure. Events such as a tornado, earthquake,
catastrophic fire, or a hurricane are examples of extraordinary circumstances. The capital
project must cost at least $5 million to qualify for this exception.
24. D. MS-DRG Classification
The MS-DRGs (Medicare Severity DRGs) are a patient classification system which
provides a means of relating types of patients a hospital treats (i.e., its case mix) to the
costs incurred by the hospital. Payment for inpatient hospital services is made on the basis
of a rate per discharge that varies according to the MS-DRG to which a beneficiary's stay
is assigned. All inpatient transfer/discharge bills from both PPS and non-PPS facilities,
including those from waiver States, long-term care facilities, and excluded units are
classified by the Grouper software program into one of 745 diagnosis related groups
(DRGs).
The following MS-DRGs receive special attention:
•
MS-DRGs No. 981-983 - Represent discharges with valid data, but the surgical
procedure is unrelated to the principal diagnosis. MS-DRGs 981 (Extensive O.R.
Procedure Unrelated to the Principal Diagnosis w/ MCC), 982 (Extensive O.R. Procedure
Unrelated to the Principal Diagnosis w/ CC), and 983 (Extensive O.R. Procedure
Unrelated to the Principal Diagnosis w/o CC/MCC) each have relative weights assigned to
them and will be paid. The hospital must review the record on each of these MS-DRGs in
the remittance record and determine that where either the principle diagnosis or surgical
procedure was reported incorrectly, prepare an adjustment bill. The FI may elect to avoid
the adjustment bill by returning the bill to the hospital prior to payment.
• MS-DRG No. 998 - Represents a discharge reporting a principle diagnosis that is
invalid as a principal diagnosis. Examples include a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or an
infection of the genitourinary tract during pregnancy, both unspecified as to episode of
care. These diagnoses may be valid, but they are not sufficient to determine the principal
diagnosis for MS-DRG assignment purposes. FIs will return the claims. The hospital
must enter the corrected principal diagnosis for proper MS-DRG assignment and resubmit
the claim.
•
MS-DRG No. 999 - Represents a discharge with invalid data, making it
ungroupable. FIs return the claims for correction of data elements affecting proper MSDRG assignment. The hospital resubmits the corrected claim.
When the bills are processed in conjunction with the MCE (see §20.2.1) coding
inconsistencies in the information and data are identified.
The MCE must be run before Grouper to identify inconsistencies before the bills are
processed through the Grouper.
E. Difference in Age/Admission Versus Discharge
HO-415.4
When a beneficiary's age changes between the date of admission and date of discharge, the
DRG and related payment amount are determined from the patient's age at admission.
25. 20.1 – Hospital Operating Payments Under PPS
(Rev. 1816; Issued: 09-17-09; Effective Date: Discharges on or after October 1,
2009; Implementation Date: 10-05-09)
Section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act (the Act) sets forth a system of payment for the
operating costs of acute care hospital inpatient stays under Medicare Part A (Hospital
Insurance) based on prospectively set rates. Under the PPS, Medicare payment for hospital
inpatient operating costs is made at predetermined, specific rates for each hospital
discharge. Discharges are classified according to a list of diagnosis-related groups
(DRGs).
The base payment rate is comprised of a standardized amount that is divided into a laborrelated share and a nonlabor-related share. The labor-related share is adjusted by the wage
index applicable to the area where the hospital is located; and if the hospital is located in
Alaska or Hawaii, the nonlabor-related share is adjusted by a cost-of-living adjustment
factor. This base payment rate is multiplied by the DRG relative weight.
If the hospital treats a high percentage of low-income patients, it receives a percentage
add-on payment applied to the DRG-adjusted base payment rate. This add-on payment,
known as the disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustment, provides for a percentage
increase in Medicare payments to hospitals that qualify under statutory formulas designed
to identify hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients. For
qualifying hospitals, the amount of this adjustment may vary based on the outcome of the
statutory calculations.
If the hospital is an approved teaching hospital, it receives a percentage add-on payment
for each case paid under the PPS (known as the indirect medical education (IME)
adjustment). This percentage varies, depending on the ratio of residents to beds.
Additional payments may be made for cases that involve new technologies that have been
approved for special add-on payments. To qualify, a new technology must demonstrate
that it is a substantial clinical improvement over technologies otherwise available, and
that, absent an add-on payment, it would be inadequately paid under the regular DRG
payment.
The costs incurred by the hospital for a case are evaluated to determine whether the
hospital is eligible for an additional payment as an outlier case. This additional payment is
designed to protect the hospital from large financial losses due to unusually expensive
cases. Any outlier payment due is added to the DRG-adjusted base payment rate, plus any
DSH, IME, and new technology add-on adjustments.
Although payments to most hospitals under the PPS are made on the basis of the
standardized amounts, some categories of hospitals are paid based on the higher of a
hospital-specific rate determined from their costs in a base year as specified in the statute,
or the PPS rate based on the standardized amount. For example, sole community hospitals
26. (SCHs) are the sole source of care in their areas, and small rural Medicare-dependent
hospitals (MDHs) are a major source of care for Medicare beneficiaries in their areas.
Both of these categories of hospitals are afforded this special payment protection in order
to maintain access to services for beneficiaries (although the statutory payment formulas
for SCHs and MDHs differ as described below in section 20.6).
The existing regulations governing payments to hospitals under the PPS are located in
42 CFR Part 412, Subparts A through M.
20.1.1 – Hospital Wage Index
(Rev. 70, 01-23-04)
Section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act requires that, as part of the methodology for determining
prospective payments to hospitals, the Secretary must adjust the standardized amounts
“for area differences in hospital wage levels by a factor (established by the Secretary)
reflecting the relative hospital wage level in the geographic area of the hospital compared
to the national average hospital wage level.” This adjustment factor is the wage index.
CMS defines hospital geographic areas (labor market areas) based on the definitions of
urban (e.g., Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)) and rural areas issued by the Office of
Management and Budget.
The Act further requires the wage index to be updated annually, based on a survey of
wages and wage-related costs of short-term, acute care hospitals. These data are collected
on Worksheet S-3, Parts II and III of the Medicare Cost Report (Form CMS-2552). To
ensure the accuracy of the wage index, fiscal intermediaries are required to perform annual
desk reviews of hospitals’ wage data. CMS also publishes the wage data, and allows
hospitals an opportunity to review and request corrections to the data, before the wage
index is finalized.
In computing the wage index, CMS derives an average hourly wage for each labor market
area (total wage costs divided by total hours for all hospitals in the geographic area) and a
national average hourly wage (total wage costs divided by total hours for all hospitals
surveyed in the nation). A labor market area’s wage index value is the ratio of the area’s
average hourly wage to the national average hourly wage. If a labor market area’s average
hourly wage is greater than the national average, the area’s wage index value will be
greater than 1.0000. If an area’s average hourly wage is less than the national average, the
area’s wage index value will be less than 1.0000. The wage index adjustment factor is
applied only to the labor portion of the standardized amounts.
Section 4410 of Public Law 105-33 provides that, for discharges on or after October 1,
1997, the area wage index value applicable to any hospital that is located in an urban area
may not be less than the area wage index value applicable to hospitals located in rural
areas in that State. Furthermore, this wage index floor is to be implemented in such a
manner as to ensure that aggregate prospective payment system payments are not greater
or less than those that would have been made in the year if this section did not apply.
27. 20.1.2 - Outliers
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
§1886(d)(5)(A) of the Act provides for Medicare payments to Medicare-participating
hospitals in addition to the basic prospective payments for cases incurring extraordinarily
high costs. This additional payment known as an “Outlier” is designed to protect the
hospital from large financial losses due to unusually expensive cases. To qualify for
outlier payments, a case must have costs above a fixed-loss cost threshold amount (a
dollar amount by which the costs of a case must exceed payments in order to qualify for
outliers), which is published in the annual Inpatient Prospective Payment System final
rule. The regulations governing payments for operating costs under the IPPS are located
in 42 CFR Part 412. The specific regulations governing payments for outlier cases are
located at 42 CFR 412.80 through 412.86.
The actual determination of whether a case qualifies for outlier payments is made by the
Medicare contractor using Pricer, which takes into account both operating and capital
costs and Medicare severity-diagnostic related group (MS-DRG) payments. That is, the
combined operating and capital costs of a case must exceed the fixed loss outlier threshold
to qualify for an outlier payment. The operating and capital costs are computed separately
by multiplying the total covered charges by the operating and capital cost-to-charge ratios.
The estimated operating and capital costs are compared with the fixed-loss threshold after
dividing that threshold into an operating portion and a capital portion (by first summing
the operating and capital ratios and then determining the proportion of that total comprised
by the operating and capital ratios and applying these percentages to the fixed-loss
threshold). The thresholds are also adjusted by the area wage index (and capital
geographic adjustment factor) before being compared to the operating and capital costs of
the case. Finally, the outlier payment is based on a marginal cost factor equal to 80
percent of the combined operating and capital costs in excess of the fixed-loss threshold
(90 percent for burn MS-DRGs). Any outlier payment due is added to the MS-DRG
adjusted base payment rate, plus any DSH, IME and new technology add-on payment.
For a more detailed explanation on the calculation of outlier payments, visit our Web site
at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/hipps/ippsotlr.asp.
The Medicare contractor may choose to review outliers if data analysis deems it a priority.
The IPPS outliers are not applicable to non-PPS hospitals. The Pricer program makes all
outlier determinations except for the medical review determination. Outlier payments
apply only to the Federal portion of a capital PPS payment.
20.1.2.1 - Cost to Charge Ratios
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
For discharges before August 8, 2003, Medicare contractors used the latest final settled
cost report to determine a hospital’s cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs). For those hospitals that
met the criteria in part I. A. of PM A-03-058 (July 3, 2003), effective for discharges
occurring on or after August 8, 2003 Medicare contractors are to use alternative CCRs
28. rather than one based on the latest settled cost report when determining a hospital’s CCR
(to download PM A-03-058, visit our Web site at
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Transmittals/Downloads/A03058.pdf). For all other hospitals,
effective October 1, 2003, Medicare contractors are to use CCRs from the latest final
settled cost report or from the latest tentative settled cost report (whichever is from the
later period) to determine a hospital’s operating and capital CCRs.
A. Calculating a Cost-to-Charge Ratio
For IPPS outlier calculations, Medicare’s portion of hospital costs is determined by using
hospital specific cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs). At the end of the cost reporting period, the
hospital prepares and submits a cost report to its Medicare contractor, which includes
Medicare allowable costs and charges. The Medicare contractor completes a preliminary
review of the as-submitted cost report and issue a tentative settlement. The cost report is
later final settled, which may be based on a subsequent review, and an NPR is issued.
The Medicare contractor shall update the PSF using the CCR calculated from the final
settled cost report or from the latest tentative settled cost report (whichever is from the
later period).
Effective November 7, 2005, the following methodology shall be used to calculate a
hospital’s operating and capital CCRs.
Inpatient PPS Operating CCR
1) Identify total Medicare inpatient operating costs from the Medicare cost report,
from Worksheet D-1, Part II, line 53. (If a positive amount is reported on line 42 for
nursery costs, subtract this amount on line 42 from the amount on line 53).
2) Identify total Medicare inpatient operating charges (the sum of routine and
ancillary charges), from Worksheet D-4, column 2, the sum of lines 25 through 30 and
line 103.
3) Determine the Inpatient PPS operating CCR by dividing the amount in step 1 by
the amount in step 2.
Inpatient Capital CCR
1) Identify total Medicare inpatient capital cost from Worksheet D Part 1, column 10,
sum of lines 25 through 30, plus column 12, sum of lines 25 through 30 plus Medicare
inpatient ancillary capital costs from Worksheet D Part II, column 6, line 101 plus column
8 line 101.
2) Identify total Medicare inpatient capital charges (the sum of routine and ancillary
charges), from Worksheet D-4, column 2, the sum of lines 25 through 30 and line 103.
3) Determine the Inpatient PPS capital CCR by dividing the amount in step 1 by the
amount in step 2.
29. B. Use of Alternative Data in Determining CCRs For Hospitals
Effective August 8, 2003, the CMS Central Office may direct Medicare contractors to use
an alternative CCR if CMS believes this will result in a more accurate CCR. Also, if the
Medicare contractor finds evidence that indicates that using data from the latest settled or
tentatively settled cost report would not result in the most accurate CCR, then the
Medicare contractor shall notify the CMS Regional Office and CMS Central Office to
seek approval to use a CCR based on alternative data. For example, CCRs may be revised
more often if a change in a hospital’s operations occurs which materially affects a
hospital’s costs and/or charges. The CMS Regional Office, in conjunction with the CMS
Central Office, must approve the Medicare contractor’s request before the Medicare
contractor may use a CCR based on alternative data. Revised CCRs will be applied
prospectively to all IPPS claims processed after the update. Medicare contractors shall
send notification to the Central Office via the following address and email address:
CMS
C/O Division of Acute Care- IPPS Outlier Team
7500 Security Blvd
Mail Stop C4-08-06
Baltimore, MD 21244
outliersIPPS@cms.hhs.gov
C. Ongoing CCR Updates Using CCRs From Tentative Settlements For Hospitals
Subject to the IPPS
The Medicare contractor shall continue to update a hospital’s operating and capital CCRs
(in the Provider Specific File) each time a more recent cost report is settled (either final or
tentative). Revised CCRs shall be entered into the Provider Specific File not later than 30
days after the date of the latest settlement used in calculating the CCRs.
Subject to the approval of CMS, a hospital’s operating and/or capital CCR may be revised
more often if a change in a hospital’s operations occurs which materially affects a
hospital’s costs or charges. A revised CCR will be applied prospectively to all hospital
claims processed after the update.
D. Request for use of a Different CCR by CMS, the Medicare Contractor or the
Hospital
Effective August 8, 2003, CMS (or the Medicare contractor) may specify an alternative
CCR if it believes that the CCR being applied is inaccurate. In addition, a hospital will
have the opportunity to request that a different CCR be applied in the event it believes the
CCR being applied is inaccurate. The hospital is required to present substantial evidence
supporting its request. Such evidence should include documentation regarding its costs
and charges that demonstrate its claim that an alternative ratio is more accurate. After the
Medicare contractor has evaluated the evidence presented by the hospital, the Medicare
contractor notifies the CMS regional office and CMS Central Office of any such request.
30. The CMS Regional Office, in conjunction with the CMS Central Office, will approve or
deny any request by the hospital or Medicare contractor for use of a different CCR.
Medicare contractors shall send requests to the CMS Central Office using the address and
email address provided above.
E. Notification to Hospitals Under the IPPS of a Change in the CCR
The Medicare contractor shall notify a hospital whenever it makes a change to its CCR.
When a CCR is changed as a result of a tentative settlement or a final settlement, the
change to the CCR can be included in the notice that is issued to each provider after a
tentative or final settlement is completed. Medicare contractors can also issue separate
notification to a hospital about a change to their CCR(s).
F. Hospital Mergers, Conversions, and Errors with CCRs
Effective November 7, 2005, for hospitals that merge, Medicare contractors shall continue
to use the operating and capital CCRs calculated from the Medicare cost report associated
with the surviving provider number. If a new provider number is issued, as explained in
§20.1.2.2 below, Medicare contractors may use the Statewide average CCR because a new
provider number indicates the creation of a new hospital (as stated in 42 CFR 412.84
(i)(3)(i), a new hospital is defined as an entity that has not accepted assignment of an
existing hospital’s provider agreement). For non-IPPS hospitals (e.g., long term care,
psychiatric, or rehabilitation hospitals) that convert to IPPS status, or IPPS hospitals that
maintain their IPPS status but receive a new IPPS provider number the Statewide average
CCR may be applied to that hospital. However, as noted in part C above, the Medicare
contractor or the hospital may request use of a different CCR, such as a CCR based on the
cost and charge data from the hospital’s cost report before it converted to IPPS status, or
received a new provider number. The Medicare contractor must verify the cost and charge
data from that cost report. Use of the alternative CCR is subject to the approval of the
CMS Central and Regional Offices.
In instances where errors related to CCRs and/or outlier payments are discovered,
Medicare contractors shall contact the CMS Central Office to seek further guidance.
Medicare contractors may contact the CMS Central Office via the address and email
address listed in part B of this section.
If a cost report is reopened after final settlement and as a result of this reopening there is a
change to the CCR, Medicare contractors should contact the CMS Regional and Central
Office for further instructions. Medicare contractors may contact the CMS Central Office
via the address and email address listed in part B of this section.
G. Maintaining a History of CCRs and Other Fields in the Provider Specific File
When reprocessing claims due to outlier reconciliation, Medicare contractors shall
maintain an accurate history of certain fields in the provider specific file (PSF). This
history is necessary to ensure that claims already processed (from prior cost reporting
31. periods that have already been settled) will not be subject to a duplicate systems
adjustment in the event that claims need to be reprocessed. As a result, the following
fields in the PSF can only be altered on a prospective basis: -23 -Intern to Bed Ratio -24 -Bed Size -25 -Operating Cost to Charge Ratio -27 -SSI Ratio -28 -Medicaid Ratio -47 Capital Cost to Charge Ratio 49 -Capital IME and 21 -Case Mix Adjusted Cost Per
Discharge. A separate history outside of the PSF is not necessary. The only instances a
Medicare contractor retroactively changes a field in the PSF is to update the operating or
capital CCR when using the FISS Lump Sum Utility for outlier reconciliation or otherwise
specified by the CMS Regional Office or Central Office.
20.1.2.2 - Statewide Average Cost-to-Charge Ratios
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
For discharges prior to August 8, 2003, Statewide average CCRs are used in those
instances in which a hospital’s operating or capital CCRs fall above or below reasonable
parameters. CMS sets forth these parameters and the Statewide average CCRs in each
year’s annual notice of prospective payment rates.
For discharges occurring on or after August 8, 2003, the Medicare contractor may use a
Statewide average CCR if it is unable to determine an accurate operating or capital CCR
for a hospital in one of the following circumstances:
1. New hospitals that have not yet submitted their first Medicare cost report. (For
this purpose, a new hospital is defined as an entity that has not accepted
assignment of an existing hospital’s provider agreement in accordance with 42
CFR 489.18.)
2. Hospitals whose operating or capital CCR is in excess of 3 standard deviations
above the corresponding national geometric mean. This mean is recalculated
annually by CMS and published in the annual notice of prospective payment rates
issued in accordance with § 412.8(b) of the CFR.
3. Other hospitals which accurate data with which to calculate either an operating or
capital CCR (or both) are not available.
However, the policies of §20.1.2.1 part C and part E can be applied as an alternative to the
Statewide average.
For those hospitals assigned the Statewide average operating and/or capital CCRs, these
CCRs must be updated every October 1 based on the latest Statewide average CCRs
published in each year’s annual notice of prospective payment rates until the hospital is
assigned a CCR based on the latest tentative or final settled cost report or a CCR based on
the policies of §20.1.2.1 part C of this manual.
A hospital is not assigned the Statewide average CCR if its CCR falls below 3 standard
deviations from the national mean CCR. In such a case, the hospital’s actual operating or
capital CCR is used.
32. 20.1.2.3 - Threshold and Marginal Cost
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
The Medicare contractor, using Pricer, determines an appropriate additional payment for
inpatient services where hospital charges for covered services furnished to the beneficiary,
adjusted for cost, are extraordinarily high. CMS annually determines, and includes in the
annual IPPS Final Rule and in Pricer, the threshold beyond which a cost outlier is paid.
The additional payment amount is the difference between the estimated cost for the
discharge (determined by multiplying the hospital specific CCR by the hospital’s charges
for the discharge) and the threshold criteria established for the applicable DRG multiplied
by a marginal cost factor of 80 percent. (The marginal cost factor for burn cases is 90
percent, as described in §20.1.2.8.) CMS includes the marginal cost factor in Pricer. For
more explanation on the calculation of outliers visit our Web site at
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AcuteInpatientPPS/04_outlier.asp#TopOfPage
20.1.2.4 - Transfers
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
A. Transfers Between IPPS Hospitals
For transfers between IPPS hospitals, the transferring hospital is paid based upon a per
diem rate. The transferring hospital may be paid a cost outlier payment. The outlier
threshold for the transferring hospital is equal to the outlier threshold for non-transfer
cases, divided by the geometric mean length of stay for the DRG, multiplied by a number
equal to the length of stay for the case plus one day.
The payment to the final discharging hospital is made at the full prospective payment rate.
The outlier threshold and payment are calculated the same as any other discharge without
a transfer. For further information on transfers between IPPS hospitals, see §40.2.4 part A
of this manual.
B. Transfers from an IPPS Hospital to Hospitals or Units Excluded from IPPS that
do not Fall within a DRG that is Subject to the Postacute Care Transfer Policy
For transfers from an IPPS hospital to a hospital or unit excluded from IPPS with a DRG
that is not subject to the postacute care transfer policy, the transferring hospital is paid the
full IPPS rate. The transferring hospital may be paid a cost outlier payment. The outlier
threshold and payment are calculated the same as any other discharge without a transfer.
The payment to the final discharging hospital or unit is made at the rate of its respective
payment system. For further information on transfers from an IPPS hospital to hospitals
or units excluded from IPPS that do not fall within a DRG that is subject to the postacute
care transfer policy, see §40.2.4 part B of this manual.
C. Transfers from an IPPS Hospital to Hospitals or Units Excluded from IPPS that
Fall within a DRG that is Subject to the Postacute Care Transfer Policy
33. For transfers from an IPPS hospital to a hospital or unit excluded from IPPS with a DRG
that is subject to the postacute care transfer policy, the transferring hospital is paid based
upon a per diem rate. The transferring hospital may be paid a cost outlier payment. In
general, the outlier threshold for the transferring hospital is equal to the outlier threshold
for non-transfer cases, divided by the geometric mean length of stay for the DRG,
multiplied by a number equal to the length of stay for the case plus one day. If a discharge
is assigned to a special pay DRG subject to the post acute care transfer policy the outlier
threshold is equal to the fixed-loss cost outlier threshold for non-transfer cases, divided by
the geometric mean length of stay for the DRG, multiplied by 0.5 plus the product of the
0.5 multiplied by a number equal to the length of stay plus one day multiplied by 0.5.
The payment to the final discharging hospital or unit is made at the rate of its respective
payment system. For further information on transfers from an IPPS hospital to hospitals
or units excluded from IPPS that fall within a DRG subject to the postacute care transfer
policy, see §40.2.4 part C and D.
20.1.2.5 - Reconciliation
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
A. General
Under 42 CFR § 412.84(i)(4), for discharges occurring on or after August 8, 2003, high
cost outlier payments may be reconciled upon cost report settlement to account for
differences between the CCR used to pay the claim at its original submission by the
provider, and the CCR determined at final settlement of the cost reporting period during
which the discharge occurred. This new regulation was implemented in two phases
(further explanation on these two phases is provided below). Hospitals that Medicare
contractors identified using the criteria in §I.A. of PM A-03-058 (under which Medicare
contractors identified hospitals whose charges appeared to have been increasing at an
excessive rate) are subject to the reconciliation policies described in this section for
discharges occurring on or after August 8, 2003. For all other hospitals, reconciliation is
effective beginning with discharges occurring in a hospital’s first cost reporting period
beginning on or after October 1, 2003.
Subject to the approval of the CMS Central Office, a hospital’s outlier claims will be
reconciled at the time of cost report final settlement if they meet the following criteria:
1. The actual operating CCR is found to be plus or minus 10 percentage points
from the CCR used during that time period to make outlier payments, and
2. Total outlier payments in that cost reporting period exceed $500,000.
To determine if a hospital meets the criteria above, the Medicare contractor shall
incorporate all the adjustments from the cost report, run the cost report, calculate the
revised CCR and compute the actual operating CCR prior to issuing a Notice of Program
34. Reimbursement (NPR). If the criteria for reconciliation are not met, the cost report shall
be finalized. If the criteria for reconciliation are met, Medicare contractors shall follow
the instructions below in §20.1.2.7. The NPR cannot be issued nor can the cost report be
finalized until outlier reconciliation is complete.
The first criterion requires a 10 percentage point fluctuation in the operating CCR only
(and not the capital CCR). However, if a hospital meets both criteria, claims will be
reconciled using the operating and capital CCRs from the final settled cost report.
As stated above, if a cost report is reopened after final settlement and as a result of this
reopening there is a change to the CCR (which could trigger or affect outlier reconciliation
and outlier payments), Medicare contractors shall notify the CMS Regional and Central
Office for further instructions. Notification to the CMS Central Office shall be sent to the
address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1 (b).
Even if a hospital does not meet the criteria for reconciliation, subject to approval of the
Regional and Central Office, the Medicare contractor has the discretion to request that a
hospital’s outlier payments in a cost reporting period be reconciled if the hospital’s most
recent cost and charge data indicate that the outlier payments to the hospital were
significantly inaccurate. The Medicare contractor sends notification to the Central Office
via the address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1 (b). Upon approval of the CMS
Regional and Central Office that a hospital’s outlier claims need to be reconciled,
Medicare contractors should follow the instructions in §20.1.2.7.
B. Reconciling Outlier Payments for those Hospitals Identified in PM A-03-058
As stated above, for a hospital that met the criteria in §I.A. of PM A-03-058,
reconciliation begins for discharges occurring on or after August 8, 2003. To establish
whether a hospital’s outlier payments are subject to reprocessing, Medicare contractors
determine if the CCR and total outlier payments from the entire cost reporting period meet
the two criteria in part A of this section. However, if both criteria for reconciliation are
met, only the discharges that occurred between August 8, 2003 and the end of the cost
reporting period will be reconciled. These hospitals will be subject to reconciliation in
subsequent cost reporting periods if they meet the two criteria outlined in part A of this
section. See example A below.
The Medicare contractors shall notify the CMS Regional Office and CMS Central Office
of any hospital that meets the criteria for reconciliation. Notification to the CMS Central
Office shall be sent to the address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1. Further
instructions for Medicare contractors on reconciliation and the time value of money are
provided below in §§20.1.2.6 and 20.1.2.7.
EXAMPLE A:
Cost Reporting Period: 09/01/2002-08/31/2003
35. Operating CCR used to pay original claims submitted during cost reporting period: 0.40
(In this example, this CCR is from the tentatively or final settled 2002 cost report)
Final settled operating CCR from 09/01/2002-08/31/2003 cost report: 0.50
Total outlier payout in 09/01/2002-08/31/2003 cost reporting period: $600,000
Because the CCR of 0.40 used at the time the claim was originally paid changed to 0.50 at
the time of final settlement, and the provider received greater than $500,000 in outlier
payments during that cost reporting period, the provider’s claims for discharges from
August 8, 2003 through August 31, 2003 shall be reconciled using the correct CCR of
0.50. The same criteria shall be applied to the cost report beginning on 09/01/2003 to
determine whether reconciliation of outlier payments for that cost reporting period is
necessary. For details on how to apply multiple CCRs in a cost reporting period, see
example C below.
C. Reconciling Outlier Payments for those Hospitals Not Identified in PM A-03-058
Beginning with the first cost reporting period starting on or after October 1, 2003, all
hospitals are subject to the reconciliation policies set forth in this section. If a hospital
meets the criteria in part A of this section, the Medicare contractor shall notify the CMS
Regional Office and Central Office at the address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1.
Further instructions for Medicare contractors on reconciliation and the time value of
money are provided below in §§20.1.2.6 and 20.1.2.7.
The following examples demonstrate how to apply the criteria for reconciliation:
EXAMPLE B:
Cost Reporting Period: 01/01/2004-12/31/2004
Operating CCR used to pay original claims submitted during cost reporting period: 0.40
(In this example, this CCR is from the tentatively settled 2002 cost report)
Final settled operating CCR from 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost report: 0.50
Total outlier payout in 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost reporting period: $600,000
Because the CCR of 0.40 used at the time the claim was originally paid changed to 0.50 at
the time of final settlement, and the provider received greater than $500,000 in outlier
payments during that cost reporting period, the criteria has been met to trigger
reconciliation, and therefore, the Medicare contractor shall notify the CMS Regional
Office and Central Office. The provider’s outlier payments for this cost reporting period
will be reconciled using the correct CCR of 0.50.
In the event that multiple CCRs are used in a given cost reporting period, Medicare
contractors should calculate a weighted average of the CCRs in that cost reporting period.
36. (See Example C below for instructions on how to weight the CCRs). The Medicare
contractor shall then compare the weighted CCR to the CCR determined at the time of
final settlement of the cost reporting period to determine if reconciliation is required.
Again, total outlier payments for the entire cost reporting period must exceed $500,000 in
order to trigger reconciliation.
EXAMPLE C:
Cost Reporting Period: 01/01/2004-12/31/2004
Operating CCR used to pay original claims submitted during cost reporting period:
-
0.40 from 01/01/2004-03/31/2004 (This CCR could be from the tentatively
settled 2001 cost report)
-
0.50 from 04/01/2004-12/31/2004 (This CCR could be from the tentatively
settled 2002 cost report)
Final settled operating CCR from 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost report: 0.35
Total Outlier payout in 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost reporting period: $600,000
Weighted Average CCR: 0.474
CCR
0.40
Days
91
Weight
0.248 (91 Days / 366 Days)
0.50
275
0.751 (275 Days / 366 Days )
TOTAL
*366
Weighted CCR
(a) 0.099=
(0.40 * 0.248)
(b) 0.375=
(0.50 * 0.751)
(a)+(b) =0.4742
*NOTE: There are 366 days in the year because 2004 was a leap year.
The hospital meets the criteria for reconciliation in this cost reporting period because the
weighted average CCR at the time the claim was originally paid changed from 0.474 to
0.35 (which is greater than 10 percentage points) at the time of final settlement, and the
provider received an outlier payment greater than $500,000 for the entire cost reporting
period.
D. Providers Already Flagged for Outlier Reconciliation
Medicare contractors shall have until April 25, 2011 to submit via email to
outliersipps@cms.hhs.gov a list of providers that were flagged for outlier reconciliation
prior to April 1, 2011 (NOTE: Do not send this list prior to April 1, 2011 as this list shall
include all providers flagged for outlier reconciliation prior to April 1, 2011). In this list,
Medicare contractors shall include the provider number, provider name, cost reporting
begin date, cost reporting end date, status of cost report (was the Notice of Program
Reimbursement (NPR) issued), date of NPR, total operating and capital outlier payments
in the cost reporting period, the operating CCR or weighted operating CCR from the time
the claims were paid during the cost reporting period being reconciled and the final settled
operating and capital CCR. The CMS Central Office will then review this list and grant
37. formal approval via email for Medicare contractors to reprice and reconcile the claims of
those hospitals that have been flagged for outlier reconciliation. Upon approval from the
CMS Central Office, Medicare contractors shall follow the procedures in §20.1.2.7 and
complete the reconciliation process by October 1, 2011. If a Medicare contractor cannot
complete the reconciliation process by October 1, 2011, the Medicare contractor shall
contact the CMS Central Office for further guidance. NOTE: Those Medicare contractors
that do not have any providers flagged for outlier reconciliation prior to April 1, 2011
shall also send an email to the address above indicating that they have no providers
flagged for outlier reconciliation prior to April 1, 2011.
20.1.2.6 - Time Value of Money
(Rev. 2242, Issued: 06-17-11, Effective: 07-01-11, Implementation: 07-01-11)
Effective for discharges occurring on or after August 8, 2003, at the time of any
reconciliation under §20.1.2.5, outlier payment may be adjusted to account for the time
value of money of any adjustments to outlier payments as a result of reconciliation. The
time value of money is applied from the midpoint of the hospital’s cost reporting period
being settled to the date on which the CMS Central Office receives notification from the
Medicare contractor that reconciliation should be performed.
If a hospital’s outlier payments have met the criteria for reconciliation, CMS will calculate
the aggregate adjustment using the instructions below concerning reprocessing claims and
determine the additional amount attributable to the time value of money of that
adjustment. The index that will be used to calculate the time value of money is the
monthly rate of return that the Medicare trust fund earns. This index can be found at
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/newIssueRates.html.
The following formula will be used to calculate the rate of the time value of money.
(Rate from Web site as of the midpoint of the cost report being settled / 365) * # of days
from that midpoint until date of reconciliation. NOTE: The time value of money can be a
positive or negative amount depending if the provider is owed money by CMS or if the
provider owes money to CMS.
For purposes of calculating the time value of money, the “date of reconciliation” is the day
on which the CMS Central Office receives notification. This date is either the postmark
from the written notification sent to the CMS Central Office via mail by the Medicare
contractor, or the date an email was received from the Medicare contractor by the CMS
Central Office, whichever date is earlier.
The following is an example of the computation of the adjustment to account for the time
value of money:
EXAMPLE
Cost Reporting Period: 01/01/2004-12/31/2004
38. Midpoint of Cost Reporting Period: 07/01/2004
Date of Reconciliation: 12/31/2005
Number of days from Midpoint until date of Reconciliation: 549
Rate from Social Security Web site: 4.625%
Operating CCR used to pay actual original claims in cost reporting period: 0.40 (This
CCR could be from the tentatively settled 2002 or 2003 cost report)
Final settled operating CCR from 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost report: 0.50
Total outlier payout in 01/01/2004-12/31/2004 cost reporting period: $600,000.
Because the CCR fluctuated from .40 at the time the claims were originally paid to 0.50 at
the time of final settlement and the provider has total outlier payments greater than
$500,000, the criteria have been met to trigger reconciliation. The Medicare contractor
notifies the CMS Regional and Central Office.
The Medicare contractor reprocesses and reconciles the claims. The reprocessing indicates
the revised outlier payments are $700,000.
Using the values above, determine the rate that will be used for the time value of money:
(4.625 / 365) * 549 = 6.9565%
Based on the claims reconciled, the provider is owed $100,000 ($700,000-$600,000) for
the reconciled amount and $6,956.50 ($100,000 * 6.9565 %) for the time value of money.
20.1.2.7 - Procedure for Medicare Contractors to Perform and Record
Outlier Reconciliation Adjustments
(Rev. 2447, Issued: 04-26-12, Effective: 10-01-12, Implementation: 10-01-12)
The following is a step-by-step explanation of the procedures that Medicare contractors
are to follow if a hospital is eligible for outlier reconciliation:
1) The Medicare contractor shall send notification to the CMS Central Office (not the
hospital), via the street address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1 (B)) and
regional office that a hospital has met the criteria for reconciliation. Medicare
contractors shall include in their notification the provider number, provider name,
cost reporting begin date, cost reporting end date, total operating and capital outlier
payments in the cost reporting period, the operating CCR or weighted average
operating CCR from the time the claims were paid during the cost reporting period
eligible for reconciliation and the final settled operating and capital CCR.
39. 2) If the Medicare contractor receives approval from the CMS Central Office that
reconciliation is appropriate, the Medicare contractor follows steps 3-14 below.
NOTE: Hospital cost reports will remain open until their claims have been
processed for outlier reconciliation.
3) The Medicare contractor shall notify the hospital and copy the CMS Regional
Office and Central Office in writing and via email (through the addresses provided
in §20.1.2.1 (B)) that the hospital’s outlier claims are to be reconciled.
4) Prior to running claims in the *Lump Sum Utility, Medicare contractors shall
update the applicable provider records in the Inpatient Provider Specific File
(IPSF) by entering the final settled operating and capital CCR from the cost report
in the operating and capital CCR fields. Specifically, for hospitals paid under the
IPPS, Medicare contractors shall enter the revised operating CCR in PSF field 25 Operating Cost to Charge Ratio and the revised capital CCR in PSF field 47 Capital Cost to Charge Ratio. No other elements in the IPSF (such as elements
related to the DSH and IME adjustments) shall be updated for the applicable
provider records in the IPSF that span the cost reporting period being reconciled
aside from the elements for the operating and capital CCRs.
*NOTE: The FISS Lump Sum Utility is a Medicare contractor tool that,
depending on the elements that are input, will produce an extract that will calculate
the difference between the original PPS payment amounts and revised PPS
payment amounts into a Microsoft Access generated report. The Lump Sum Utility
calculates the original and revised payments offline and will not affect the original
claim payment amounts as displayed in various CMS systems (such as NCH).
5) Medicare contractors shall ensure that, prior to running claims through the FISS
Lump Sum Utility, all pending claims (e.g., appeal adjustments) are finalized for
the applicable provider.
6) Medicare contractors shall only run claims in the Lump Sum Utility that meet the
following criteria:
•
•
•
Type of Bill (TOB) equals 11X
Previous claim is in a paid status (P location) within FISS
Cancel date is ‘blank’
7) The Medicare contractor reconciles the claims through the applicable IPPS Pricer
software and not through any editing or grouping software.
8) Upon completing steps 3 through 7 above, the Medicare contractor shall run the
claims through the Lump Sum Utility. The Lump Sum Utility will produce an
40. extract, according to the elements in Table 1 below. NOTE: The extract must be
importable by Microsoft Access or a similar software program (Microsoft Excel).
9) Medicare contractors shall upload the extract into Microsoft Access or a similar
software program to generate a report that contains elements in Table 1. Medicare
contractors shall ensure this report is retained with the cost report settlement work
papers.
10) For hospitals paid under the IPPS, the Lump Sum Utility will calculate the
difference between the original and revised operating and capital outlier amounts.
If the difference between the original and revised operating and capital outlier
amounts (calculated by the Lump Sum Utility) is positive, then a credit amount
(addition) shall be issued to the provider. If the difference between the original and
revised operating and capital amounts (calculated by the Lump Sum Utility) is
negative, then a debit amount (deduction) shall be issued to the provider. NOTE:
The difference between the original and revised operating outlier amounts and the
difference between the original and revised capital outlier amounts are two distinct
amounts calculated by the lump sum utility and are recorded on two separate lines
on the cost report.
11) The operating and capital time value of money amounts are two distinct
calculations that are recorded separately on the cost report. Medicare contractors
shall determine the applicable time value of money amount by using the
calculation methodology in §20.1.2.6. If the difference between the original and
revised operating and capital outlier amounts is a negative amount then the time
value of money is also a negative amount. If the difference between the original
and revised operating and capital outlier amounts is a positive amount then the
time value of money is also a positive amount. Similar to step 10, if the time value
of money is positive, then a credit amount (addition) shall be issued to the
provider. If the time value of money is negative, then a debit amount (deduction)
shall be issued to the provider. NOTE: The time value of money is applied to the
difference between the original and revised operating and capital outlier amounts.
12) For cost reporting periods beginning before May 1, 2010, under cost report 255296, the Medicare contractor shall record the original operating and capital outlier
amounts, the operating and capital outlier reconciliation adjustment amount (the
difference between the original and revised operating and capital outlier amounts
calculated by the Lump Sum Utility), the operating and capital time value of
money and the rate used to calculate the time value of money on lines 50-56, of
Worksheet E, Part A of the cost report (NOTE: the amounts recorded on lines 5053 and 55 thru 56 can be positive or negative amounts per the instructions above).
The total outlier reconciliation adjustment amount (the difference between the
original and revised operating and capital outlier amount (calculated by the Lump
Sum Utility) plus the time value of money) shall be recorded on line 24.99 of
Worksheet E, Part A. For complete instructions on how to fill out these lines
41. please see § 3630.1 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual, Part II. NOTE: Both
the operating and capital amounts are combined and recorded on line 24.99 of
Worksheet E, Part A.
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after May 1, 2010, under cost report
2552-10, the Medicare contractor shall record the original operating and capital
outlier amounts, the operating and capital outlier reconciliation adjustment
amounts (the difference between the original and revised operating and capital
outlier amounts calculated by the Lump Sum Utility), the operating and capital
time value of money and the rate used to calculate the time value of money on
lines 90-96, of Worksheet E, Part A of the cost report (NOTE: the amounts
recorded on lines 90-93 and 95 thru 96 can be positive or negative amounts per the
instructions above). The total outlier reconciliation adjustment amount (the
difference between the original and revised operating and capital outlier amount
(calculated by the Lump Sum Utility) plus the time value of money) shall be
recorded on line 69 of Worksheet E, Part A. NOTE: Both the operating and capital
amounts are combined and recorded on line 69 of Worksheet E, Part A.
13) The Medicare contractor shall finalize the cost report, issue a NPR and make the
necessary adjustment from or to the provider.
14) After determining the total outlier reconciliation amount and issuing a NPR,
Medicare contractors shall restore the operating and capital CCR(s) elements to
their original values (that is, the CCRs used to pay the claims) in the applicable
provider records in the IPSF to ensure an accurate history is maintained.
Specifically, for hospitals paid under the IPPS, Medicare contractors shall enter the
original operating CCR in PSF field 25 -Operating Cost to Charge Ratio and the
original capital CCR in PSF field 47 -Capital Cost to Charge Ratio.
If the Medicare contractor has any questions regarding this process it should contact the
CMS Central Office via the address and email address provided in §20.1.2.1 (B).
Table 1: Data Elements for FISS Extract
List of Data Elements for FISS Extract
Provider #
Health Insurance Claim (HIC) Number
Document Control Number (DCN)
Type of Bill
Original Paid Date
Statement From Date
Statement To Date
Original Reimbursement Amount (claims page 10)
Revised Reimbursement Amount (claim page 10)
Difference between these amounts
Original Deductible Amount, Payer A, B, C (Value Code A1, B1, C1)
42. Revised Deductible Amount, Payer A, B, C (Value Code A1, B1, C1)
Difference between these amounts
Original Coinsurance Amount, Payer A, B, C (Value Code A2, B2, C2)
Revised Coinsurance Amount, Payer A, B, C (Value Code A2, B2, C2)
Difference between these amounts
Original Medicare Lifetime Reserve Amount in the first calendar year period (Value
Code 08)
Revised Medicare Lifetime Reserve Amount in the first calendar year period (Value
Code 08)
Difference between these amounts
Original Medicare Coinsurance Amount in the first calendar year period (Value Code 09)
Revised Medicare Coinsurance Amount in the first calendar year period (Value Code 09)
Difference between these amounts
Original Medicare Lifetime Reserve Amount in the second calendar year period (Value
code 10)
Revised Medicare Lifetime Reserve Amount in the second calendar year period (Value
code 10)
Difference between these amounts
Original Medicare Coinsurance Amount in the second calendar year period (Value code
11)
Revised Medicare Coinsurance Amount in the second calendar year period (Value code
11)
Difference between these amounts
Original Outlier Amount (Value Code 17)
Revised Outlier Amount (Value Code 17)
Difference between these amounts
Original DSH Amount (Value Code 18)
Revised DSH Amount (Value Code 18)
Difference between these amounts
Original IME Amount (Value Code 19)
Revised IME Amount (Value Code 19)
Difference between these amounts
Original New Tech Add-on (Value Code 77)
Revised New Tech Add-on (Value Code 77)
Difference between these amounts
Original Device Reductions (Value Code D4)
Revised Device Reductions (Value Code D4)
Difference between these amounts
TOT CHRG – total billed charges (claim page 3)
COV CHRG – total covered charges (claim page 3)
Original Hospital Portion (claim page 14)
Revised Hospital Portion (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original Federal Portion (claim page 14)
Revised Federal Portion (claim page 14)
43. Difference between these amounts
Original C TOT PAY (claim page 14)
Revised C TOT PAY (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original C FSP (claim page 14)
Revised C FSP (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original C OUTLIER (claim page 14)
Revised C OUTLIER (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original C DSH ADJ (claim page 14)
Revised C DSH ADJ (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original C IME ADJ (claim page 14)
Revised C IME ADJ (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original Pricer Amount
Revised Pricer Amount
Difference between these amounts
Original PPS Payment (claim page 14)
Revised PPS Payment (claim page 14)
Difference between these amounts
Original PPS Return Code (claim page 14)
Revised PPS Return Code (claim page 14)
DRG
MSP Indicator (Value Codes 12-16 & 41-43 – indicator indicating the claim is MSP; ‘Y’
= MSP, ‘blank’ = no MSP
Reason Code
HMO-IME Indicator
Filler
20.1.2.8 - Special Outlier Payments for Burn Cases
(Rev. 707, Issued: 10-12-05; Effective/Implementation Dates: 11-07-05)
For discharges occurring on or after April 1, 1988, the additional payment amount for the
DRGs related to burn cases, which are identified in the most recent annual notice of
prospective payment rates is computed using the same methodology (as stated above in
section 20.1.2.3) except that the payment is made using a marginal cost factor of 90
percent instead of 80 percent.
20.1.2.9 - Medical Review and Adjustments
(Rev. 1571; Issued: 08-07-08; Effective Date: 08-01-08; Implementation Date: 0815-08)