LECTURE 5
EVALUATION TYPES
THE CONTEXT OF EVALUATION
• ‘open market’: teachers have a large
amount of materials to choose from
• ‘handed materials’: teachers are given
materials by education authority –
need to cope with it.
• There’s no exact formula or yardstick
for evaluation but some model will be
helpful for teachers
EVALUTION TYPES
• PRE-USE
–Most difficult because teachers have
no actual experience in using the book
–To look at potential / future
performance
–Normally employs evaluation of
potential
EVALUTION TYPES
• IN-USE
–Evaluate whilst the material is in use
–Monitoring newly introduced book or
well established but aging book that
might need replacement
–Normally employs evaluation of
suitability
EVALUTION TYPES
• POST-USE
–Provides a retrospective assessment of
the performance of the book already
used
–Identify strengths & weaknesses
–Help to decide whether to continue the
use of it or not
–Normally employs evaluation of
suitability
EVALUATION OF
POTENTIAL
• To see what the book might be good for &
in what situations it could succeed
• No predetermined use in mind
• Mostly adopted in teacher training
courses – to equip students with (basic)
criteria before more specific evaluation is
faced in the future
• Question: what would this book be good
for?
EVALUATION OF
SUITABILITY
• Matching textbook against a specific
requirements – learners’ objectives,
background or resources available.
• Normally employs a checklist – specially
designed or ready-made
• Question: Would it be good for my class?
THE EXTERNAL EVALUATION
• Examining ‘what the books say about
themselves
– The ‘blurb’: claims made on the cover of
the book
– The introduction: foreword by author or
editor
– The table of contents:
• list of topics/pages
• The ‘bridge’ between external claims & actual
content
(M62-66)
Information that can be obtained
from external evaluation:
• The intended audience
• The proficiency level
• The context
• How language is presented & organized
• The author’s views on language &
methodology
Note: for other factors to consider, refer to M64-65
THE INTERNAL EVALUATION
• For effective evaluation, at least two
(preferably more) of these factors
need to be investigated:
–The presentation of the skills in the
materials
–The grading & sequencing of the
materials
–The balance between the emphasis
& the opportunity for practice
(M66-70)
THE INTERNAL EVALUATION
–The authenticity of recordings
–Incorporation of real interactions
–The relationship between tests &
exercises
–Suitable for all learning styles
–Motivation factors for teachers &
students
THE OVERALL EVALUTION
• The usability factor - how far
materials can be integrated into the
syllabus
• The generalizability factor - ‘core’
features that is generally useful
• The adaptability factor - parts that can
be added/extracted in other context
• The flexibility factor - how rigid is the
sequencing & grading?
(M70-71)

Material lect5

  • 1.
  • 2.
    THE CONTEXT OFEVALUATION • ‘open market’: teachers have a large amount of materials to choose from • ‘handed materials’: teachers are given materials by education authority – need to cope with it. • There’s no exact formula or yardstick for evaluation but some model will be helpful for teachers
  • 3.
    EVALUTION TYPES • PRE-USE –Mostdifficult because teachers have no actual experience in using the book –To look at potential / future performance –Normally employs evaluation of potential
  • 4.
    EVALUTION TYPES • IN-USE –Evaluatewhilst the material is in use –Monitoring newly introduced book or well established but aging book that might need replacement –Normally employs evaluation of suitability
  • 5.
    EVALUTION TYPES • POST-USE –Providesa retrospective assessment of the performance of the book already used –Identify strengths & weaknesses –Help to decide whether to continue the use of it or not –Normally employs evaluation of suitability
  • 6.
    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL • Tosee what the book might be good for & in what situations it could succeed • No predetermined use in mind • Mostly adopted in teacher training courses – to equip students with (basic) criteria before more specific evaluation is faced in the future • Question: what would this book be good for?
  • 7.
    EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY • Matchingtextbook against a specific requirements – learners’ objectives, background or resources available. • Normally employs a checklist – specially designed or ready-made • Question: Would it be good for my class?
  • 8.
    THE EXTERNAL EVALUATION •Examining ‘what the books say about themselves – The ‘blurb’: claims made on the cover of the book – The introduction: foreword by author or editor – The table of contents: • list of topics/pages • The ‘bridge’ between external claims & actual content (M62-66)
  • 9.
    Information that canbe obtained from external evaluation: • The intended audience • The proficiency level • The context • How language is presented & organized • The author’s views on language & methodology Note: for other factors to consider, refer to M64-65
  • 10.
    THE INTERNAL EVALUATION •For effective evaluation, at least two (preferably more) of these factors need to be investigated: –The presentation of the skills in the materials –The grading & sequencing of the materials –The balance between the emphasis & the opportunity for practice (M66-70)
  • 11.
    THE INTERNAL EVALUATION –Theauthenticity of recordings –Incorporation of real interactions –The relationship between tests & exercises –Suitable for all learning styles –Motivation factors for teachers & students
  • 12.
    THE OVERALL EVALUTION •The usability factor - how far materials can be integrated into the syllabus • The generalizability factor - ‘core’ features that is generally useful • The adaptability factor - parts that can be added/extracted in other context • The flexibility factor - how rigid is the sequencing & grading? (M70-71)