LUMBINI
    TRAVEL GUIDE APP
Opportunity Analysis Project
Problem
   People need to reach/explore
    several places (within and outside the city)
   Gather information from
     Internet    – the main source
     friends

     Word-of-Mouth

   Available search engines, travel apps –
    globally based
     Little   information for locally significant areas in the
      city
Mobile Platform
   Almost every persons own a phone
    - most of the phones are smartphones
   Growing use of mobile for internet along with
    voice & text based communication
   Search-while-go possible only through mobile
Application:Lumbini

 Lumbini – birth place of Gautam Buddha
   - UNESCO world heritage site
 Interesting and Interactive travel guide for
  Lumbini
   Requires an internet connection
   For android devices
Application:Lumbini

   Features:
    - Introduction & History of Lumbini &
    Buddha
    - Holy Sites
    - Location based interactive maps
    - Photo gallery
    - Various ways of reaching to places
    - Available hotels & transportation services
    - Reviews
Testing Value Proposition
   Hypothesis
    - Lack of adequate online information site or apps, to search
    for places, service, stations, and other facilites in a city.

    - Available website or apps not localised enought to provide
    more factual information about the place.

    -People will love a travel guide app for their smartphones that
    would provide the information regarding the various places in
    a city.

    -The app should also provide the review of the services, any
    offers, etc.
Testing Value Proposition
   Experiments
    - Focused upon a particular city "Lumbini" for app
    development.
    - Created a prototype of the Lumbini app.
    - Carried out online survey with fixed set of questionnaires
    - Interviewed few users face-to-face
    - Allowed selected users to use our app.
Testing Value Proposition
   Results


                   94 % people relied on the
                   internet to search for the
                   places.




                    91 % people used search
                    engines for their
                    search, 26% used mobile
                    apps.
Testing Value Proposition
   Results

                  Mostly android apps were
                  popular with apps from
                  Foursquare, Yelp, Tripadvisor, L
                  onely Planet, Tripso, Aroundme.




                  Even though, there were plenty
                  of apps available, people still
                  wanted better travel guide app
                  (almost everyone)
Testing Value Proposition
   Results


                  The features we had proposed
                  in our model were accepted
                  warmly.



                  Required information about
                  these areas in the app & web
                  based system
                  - Fooding
                  - Weather -Environment
                  - Clothing -Entertainment
Testing Value Proposition
   Results      User suggested features:


                 -Timing Information
                          -Cost
                 -User Participation
                 -Videos
                 -Web based version
                 -Events & History


                 Majority of users are ready to
                 participate, and would love to
                 integrate the participation
                 through social networking sites.
Testing Value Proposition




 38% owned some business   Around 60% business were not
                           registered in any online map
                           services.


                           Business owners were willing to
                           post ads, provided good user
                           base.
Market Analysis
   Revenue source
    -   Advertising space in-app through business vendor
    -   Nepal Tourism Board
    -   Hotel owners, Market place owners, Travel Agencies,
        Airlines etc. of the local area

    -   59% of the respondents with business showed lack of
        confidence in the advertising success of an in-app ad,
    -   while rest were willing to pay upto 100$, which could
        increase upto 2k – 3k dollars.
    Estimated Market Size (only for Lumbini) : 60,000$ per
     annum

    -
Final Business Model
Conclusion
   Many informative apps & websites available,
    but almost none provide the insider
    information of the city.
   Both mobile app as well as web based.
   Cost, user participation, timing, videos, history,
    etc. should be added to the app.
   With these feedbacks incorporated, this project
    is worth pursuing.

Lumbini travel guide app

  • 1.
    LUMBINI TRAVEL GUIDE APP Opportunity Analysis Project
  • 2.
    Problem  People need to reach/explore several places (within and outside the city)  Gather information from  Internet – the main source  friends  Word-of-Mouth  Available search engines, travel apps – globally based  Little information for locally significant areas in the city
  • 3.
    Mobile Platform  Almost every persons own a phone - most of the phones are smartphones  Growing use of mobile for internet along with voice & text based communication  Search-while-go possible only through mobile
  • 4.
    Application:Lumbini  Lumbini –birth place of Gautam Buddha - UNESCO world heritage site  Interesting and Interactive travel guide for Lumbini  Requires an internet connection  For android devices
  • 5.
    Application:Lumbini  Features: - Introduction & History of Lumbini & Buddha - Holy Sites - Location based interactive maps - Photo gallery - Various ways of reaching to places - Available hotels & transportation services - Reviews
  • 6.
    Testing Value Proposition  Hypothesis - Lack of adequate online information site or apps, to search for places, service, stations, and other facilites in a city. - Available website or apps not localised enought to provide more factual information about the place. -People will love a travel guide app for their smartphones that would provide the information regarding the various places in a city. -The app should also provide the review of the services, any offers, etc.
  • 7.
    Testing Value Proposition  Experiments - Focused upon a particular city "Lumbini" for app development. - Created a prototype of the Lumbini app. - Carried out online survey with fixed set of questionnaires - Interviewed few users face-to-face - Allowed selected users to use our app.
  • 8.
    Testing Value Proposition  Results 94 % people relied on the internet to search for the places. 91 % people used search engines for their search, 26% used mobile apps.
  • 9.
    Testing Value Proposition  Results Mostly android apps were popular with apps from Foursquare, Yelp, Tripadvisor, L onely Planet, Tripso, Aroundme. Even though, there were plenty of apps available, people still wanted better travel guide app (almost everyone)
  • 10.
    Testing Value Proposition  Results The features we had proposed in our model were accepted warmly. Required information about these areas in the app & web based system - Fooding - Weather -Environment - Clothing -Entertainment
  • 11.
    Testing Value Proposition  Results User suggested features: -Timing Information -Cost -User Participation -Videos -Web based version -Events & History Majority of users are ready to participate, and would love to integrate the participation through social networking sites.
  • 12.
    Testing Value Proposition 38% owned some business Around 60% business were not registered in any online map services. Business owners were willing to post ads, provided good user base.
  • 13.
    Market Analysis  Revenue source - Advertising space in-app through business vendor - Nepal Tourism Board - Hotel owners, Market place owners, Travel Agencies, Airlines etc. of the local area - 59% of the respondents with business showed lack of confidence in the advertising success of an in-app ad, - while rest were willing to pay upto 100$, which could increase upto 2k – 3k dollars. Estimated Market Size (only for Lumbini) : 60,000$ per annum -
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Conclusion  Many informative apps & websites available, but almost none provide the insider information of the city.  Both mobile app as well as web based.  Cost, user participation, timing, videos, history, etc. should be added to the app.  With these feedbacks incorporated, this project is worth pursuing.