BACK PAIN MANAGEMENT Quoc To Ai Giang D.C.
Statistics 75-85% of Americans will suffer from LBP once in their lifetime 90% will improve w/out surgery 50% of those who have an episode will have a recurrent episode within 1 year 5.4 million workers will be disabled for 1 or more years from LBP NeuroSurgery Today March 2006
Sacroiliac Joint Lumbo-sacral joint complex functions as a self-compensating mechanism which accommodates, mitigates, balances, stores and redirects forces affecting the pelvis and spine. Forces: gravity, weight bearing, inertia, rotation, acc/deceleration, ground reactive forces
Sacroiliac Joint SI joint is essential for load transfer between spine and legs Slight changes in the mobility or stability can be responsible for variety of clinical conditions
Sacroiliac Joint Pathology in this joint has been reported in numerous of inflammatory, metabolic, and infective disorders Yet mechanical dysfunctions of this joint remains controversial, largely due to our lack of knowledge about the joint
Sacroiliac Joint Composed of 2 innominate bones and a sacrum forming 2 SI joints and pubic symphysis  Ligaments, joint capsule, muscle, fascia, articular configuration
Sacroiliac Joint Sacrum A tilted wedge or keystone The weight of the spine coupled with gravity forces the sacrum to wedge snugly between the two innominates. This phenomenon along with other passive anatomical features that provide stability are called  form closure .
Form Closure Osteoarticulo-ligamentous component “ Refers to a stable situation with closely fitting joint surfaces, where no extra forces are needed to maintain the state (stability) of the system”  Vleeming
Stabilization of the pelvis via ligamentous structures Ligamentous Structures
Sacroiliac Joint SI Joint Surfaces: Sacrum: The articular surface, called auricular, is concave, covered in thick hyaline cartilage and is shaped like a plane propeller - wider P-A in the upper aspect and wider A-P in the lower aspect . Ilium: Controversy exists as to if the iliac side is fibrocartilage or hyaline.  Either way, its convex surface is irregular (rough). Shape of the SIJ effectively resists flexion.
Sacroiliac Joint Ligaments - designed to limit the mobility of the SI joint. The ligaments must oppose strong forces for long periods of time. Simonian noted the strength of the ligaments by cutting through the pubic symphysis and the iliac wings only flared out slightly.
Sacroiliac Joint Iliolumbar Ligament: limits axial rotation and anterior glide of L5 on the sacrum. Sacrotuberous Ligament: resists sacral movement into nutation,  (tightens the ligament). It also has as an important connection to the long head of the biceps  femoris. Sacrospinal Ligament: see #2 Dorsal Sacral Iliac Ligament: this large ligament tightens in counter-nutation.  It  makes up 2/3 of the posterior SI connections and blends with #2, erector spinae and thoracolumbar fascia. 1 2 4 4 3
Sacroiliac Joint Anterior Sacroiliac Ligament: opposes axial translation of the sacrum and separation of the  SI joints. Interosseous Ligament (not shown): fills in the irregular spaces posterior and superior to the joint; resists joint separation. 5
Sacroiliac Joint - Capsule Superior portion is a caudal extension of the iliolumbar ligament Anterior portion is dense connective tissue and caudally blends with the sacrospinous ligament Posterior portion is made up of multiple interwoven bands (interosseous ligaments) 5
Sacroiliac Joint - Innervation Anterior superior joint receives info. from spinal nerves L4 & 5 Anterior inferior joint supplied by S1 & 2 and other sacral nerves 5
Sacroiliac Joint Muscles: The major muscles and fascia that are involved in the SI joint are the gluteus maximus and medius, psoas, piriformis  multifidus , latissimus dorsi, abdominal obliques,  transversus abdominus ,  biceps femoris ,   l atissimus dorsi ,  pelvic floor & diaphragm  and thoracolumbar fascia. The forces created by the muscles acting on SI joint to provide stability is called  Fo rce Closure.
Force Closure “ Force closure refers to a system whereby additional forces are necessary to maintain the joint in place.” J. Snijders Second Interdisciplinary Word Congress on Low Back Pain – San Diego 1995
Force Closure Erector Spinali  Extends spine and pelvis Contraction creates sacral nutation (locking) thus ligaments tighten and SI joint locks
Force Closure Multifidi Tendon pass above interosseous ligament and inserts into sacrum, iliac crest, and sacrotuberous ligament Contraction facilitates nutation
Force Closure Gluteus Maximus Hip extensor Directly compresses SI joint due to fiber orientation Fibers blend with sacrotuberous ligament and thoracolumbar fascia
Form Closure Latissimus Dorsi Extends, abducts, and medially rotate humerus Deep fibers: lower T/S spinous processes and iliac crest Superficial fibers: oblique caudal fibers blend with thoracolumbar fascia and then contralateral gluteal muscles
Force Closure Biceps femoris Long head crosses over the ischeal tuberosity & blends into sacrotuberous ligament  Contraction increases sacrotuberous tension
Force Closure Piriformis Externally rotates femur Crosses SI joint perpendicular & compresses the joint
Force Closure Psoas Quadratus Lumborum
Force Closure Adominals The Transverse Abdominals wrap around the spine and goes all the way to the front and when activated it stabilizes the spine and pelvis
Force Closure Thoracolumbar fascia Clinical of importance in surgery, it blends with the deep cervical fascia which forms a plane for infection to travel
Force Closure Abdominals Transverse Abdominals Deepest of the 3 layers Perhaps the most functional for core stabilization, spinal stabilization
Joint Functions  If joint is compressed this will result in restriction If joint is not compressed enough this will result in instability or hypermobility If joint does not function in a smooth & efficient manner this can result in abnormal firing patterns
Joint Functions The Panjabi Model as modified by Vleeming & Lee
Integration  Joint function requires normal function of the joint & of the muscles  Form Closure  Force Closure  Joint restriction can be due to muscular and ligamentous elements  Local stabilizers vs. Global stabilizers & global maximizers
Inner Core  Tranversus Abdominus Lumbar Multifidi  Pelvic Floor  Diaphragm
The   Tranversus Abdominus   Pre-Anticipatory  Damaged by: Surgery Overactive Rectus Pendulant Abdomen  The rest of the inner unit
Lumbar Multifidi  Shut off after 3 minutes in slumped posture  Atrophy occurs in most of modern (sitting) society  Mass is replaced by fatty infiltration
Pelvic Floor  Damaged by childbirth – a normal vaginal delivery  Is affected by the other inner unit muscles not functioning  Puborectalis – a muscle of the pelvic floor can be overactive as a consequence of rectus over-activity which is itself a product of Tranversus Abdominus weakness
3 Phases to LBP Rehabilitation Phase I:  Acute Phase Physiatrist and treatment team focus on making a diagnosis, developing an appropriate treatment plan, and implementing the treatment regimen to reduce the initial low back pain and source of inflammation.  This may include any/all of the items listed above and/or the utilization of ultrasound, electrical stimulation, or specialized injections.
3 Phases to LBP Rehabilitation Phase II:  Recovery Phase Once the initial pain and inflammation are better managed, the rehabilitation team then focuses on helping the patient to restore working function of the body.  This includes returning the patient to normal daily activities while implementing a specialized exercise program that is designed to help the individual regain flexibility and strength.
3 Phases to LBP Rehabilitation Phase III:  Maintenance Phase The goal of this phase of low back pain rehabilitation is two-fold:  Educating the individual on ways to prevent further injury and strain to the back Helping the individual to maintain an appropriate level of physical fitness to help further increase strength and endurance.
Common Causes Disc Lesions with/out Radiculopathy 98% of Disc lesions occur at L4-5 & L5-S1 Overuse, strenuous activity, or improper use (i.e., repetitive or heavy lifting, exposure to vibration for prolonged periods of time) Trauma/injury/fracture Degeneration of vertebrae (often caused by stresses on the muscles and ligaments that support the spine, or the effects of instability.
Common Causes Infection Abnormal growth (tumor) Obesity (often caused by increased weight on the spine and pressure on the discs) Poor muscle tone in the back
Common Causes Muscle tension or spasm Sprain or strain Ligament or muscle tears Joint problems Smoking (damage to the vasculatures of discs) Disease (i.e., osteoarthritis, spondylitis, compression fractures)
– a term that encapsulates all the possible causes of joint changes Movement Dysfunction
–  implies some holding element that restricts movement  - possible candidates : muscle, ligament or capsular change due to some past trauma to the tissue  Joint Fixation or Restriction
a.  Capsular & Ligamentous Changes following trauma & the inflammatory cascade  Clinical Orthopedics, 1987, Akeson, Amiel, Abel, Garfin & Woo (for an overview see the Aging Body by Morgenthal & Boughie  – Chapter 3   b.  Trigger Points /  Myofascial Changes Travell & Simons – Myofascial Pain & Dysfunction –  the Trigger Point Manual Volume 1 & 2  c.  Muscle Imbalances  Janda   d.  Alterations in the Arthrokinetic Reflex  Cassidy / Mooney   Movement Dysfunction Causes:
Cassidy / Mooney Based on Hilton’s law, the nerves that innervate a joint innervate the muscles around the joint.  If there's a problem within the joint the surrounding muscles will be weakened or shut off.  This has been proposed as a primary mechanism of dysfunction in all areas of the spine.  1.)  SI joint dysfunction and glute inhibition, (Bernard and Cassidy 91)  2.)  Lumbar joint dysfunction and multifidus inhibition, (Hides 96)  3.)  Cervical spine and L. coli (longissimus coli muscle) inhibition, (Wright, Jull 2001)  4.)  Vastus medialis inhibition after knee joint dysfunction, (Richardson PhD thesis) Alterations in the Arthrokinetic Reflex
Directional Instability Nutation vs. Counternutation Dominance Sacrotuberus ligament Checks  Nutation   Long & Short Sacroiliac ligaments Checks  Counternutation   Nutation   Counternutation  Nutation Counternutation
Assessments Functionally putting the puzzle together: We need to be able to assess the  complaints through functional testing.
Orthopedic (Functional) Exams/Assessments Acute Vs. Chronic Determine if the problem is an acute vs.  chronic complaint
Gillet’s Test Performed knee to chest while standing: Pull knees alternately to chest. The PSIS that moves down the furthest in relation to the opposite one is the unblocked side. The blocked side will come very little or appear to move cephalically. Recruitment is from the bottom up. Hip flexion must be at least 90 degrees.
Gillet’s Test
Piedallu’s Sign : The movement of the posterior superior iliac spines upon forward flexion. A positive Piedallu’s sign is asymetrical movement.
Gaelen’s Test: The patient lies on the side with the upper leg (test leg) hyperextended at the hip (1st photo). The patient holds the lower leg flexed against the chest. The examiner stabilizes the pelvis while extending the hip of the uppermost leg. The test can also be performed supine (2nd) but this position may limit the amount of hyperextension. Position patient so the test hip extends beyond the edge pf the table. Then draw up both legs onto the chest then slowly lower the test leg into extension.  Pain in the sacroiliac joints indicates a positive test.
Gait Analysis
Gait How can we incorporate static anatomy into functional anatomy?
Gait – Heel Strike Prior to heel strike, heel strike becomes active Which increases tension of sacrotuberous ligament Thus compresses SI joint Forces transmitted across SI joint into spine
Gait – Stance Phase Innominates begin anterior rotation  counter-nutation begins Loose SI joint. locking Long Dorsal SI ligament tension increases Need to stabilize SI joint Gluteus maximus activates and replaces Biceps femoris Contralateral lats dorsi activates
Gait – Swing Phase No weight in SI joint. It is suspended. Ligamentous control of SI joint
Gait With Each Phase of Gait Opposite arm and “wringing of spine”  (it occurs like taking a rubber band and  twisting it, when you let go, it “springs”) Ligaments, discs, and spinal curves maximize yielding energy storage Elastic Energy is released in the next cycle —followed by muscular energy
Treatment Treatment should be inclusive to include all the tissues that can affect movement.  Each treatment should be tailor made to fit the patients dysfunction, manipulation, mobilization, rehabilitation, stretching & diet/nutrition should a part of every doctor’s practice regiment.
Treatments Activity modification  Medication  Physical rehabilitation and/or therapy  Occupational therapy  Weight loss (if overweight)
INTEGRATED METHOD OF TREATMENT
Treatments Following a prevention program (as directed by your physician) Quit smoking Surgery  Assistive devices (i.e., mechanical back supports)
Why Failures?
Application With all our knowledge in anatomy we need to learn how to apply it to the patient who is having pain after all the treatments they’ve had. Extensive connections of sacrotuberous ligaments Gluteus Maximus Piriformis Bicep Femoris Multifidi Thoracolumbar Fascia
Application SI joint is located in the middle of considerable force streams Mechanoreceptors Dysfunctional of Form/Force Closure can have significant effects locally at the SI joint and far into the lower/upper limbs or cervical spine. Loss of bracing Shifting of loads into the lumbar/sacral area
Applications Often these connections are incomplete, unilateral or asymetrical I.E. - Unilateral shorten biceps Could these differences cause symptoms in the patient? The answer is YES!
Applications Our goal is to find these differences Evaluations of: Trigger Points Hyper/Hypotonicity  Myofascial bands Decrease muscle length Pain
Applications These imbalances will change the function of the SI joints and L/S as a UNIT FAILED SELF BRACING “ Abnormal movement of the sacrum in the SI joints may lead to abnormal stress loads transmitted into the L/S thus abnormal stress on the intervertebral discs and joints.” - Vleeming
Failed Self Bracing Imbalances Weak erector spinae leads to insufficient nutation Weak gluteus maximus leads to insufficient SI compression Weak Lats leads to insufficient SI compression Decreased SI joint. compression & poor nutation leads to dysfunction and pain syndromes
Failed Self Bracing Sustained counter-nutation leads to: Absent SI compression therefore increasing joint shear forces Lordosis is lost Load is transferred to L/S and discs…increasing shear
Failed Self Bracing Irritation of the SI joint inhibits the gluteus maximus Inhibition = weakness Hamstring will attempt to increase hip extension and help increase SI joint compression shorten stride
References Lee DG, Vleeming A.  Impaired load transfer through the pelvic girdle, a new model of altered neutral zone function.  Proceedings from the 3 rd  Interdisciplinary Word Congress on Low Back and Pelvic pain .  Vienna 1998;76-81. Hodges PW, Richardson CA.  Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain.  A motor control evaluation of transverse abdominus.  Spine  1996;21(22):2640-50. Hodges PW, Richardson CA.  Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb.  Physical Therapy .  1997;77:132-44. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Lee D.  Alteration of the sacroiliac joint motion patterns in subjects with pelvic motion asymetry.  Proceedings from the 4 th  World Interdisciplinary Congress on low back and pelvic pain.  Montreal  2001. Lee DG.  The pelvic girdle, 2 nd  Edition.  Churchill Livingstone.  Edinburgh 1999. Lee DG.  Treatment of pelvic instability.  Movement, stability, and low back pain .  Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.  1997;37:445-459. Panjabi MM.  The stabilizing system of the spine.  Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;5(4):383-89.
References Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL.  What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?  JAMA . 1992;268:760-765. Papagerogiou AC, Croft PR, Ferry S, et al.  Estimating the prevalence of low back in the general population: evidence from the South Machester back pain survey.  Spine . 1995;17:1889-1894. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu JY.  Descriptiv epidemiology of low back pain and its related medical care in the United States.  Spine . 1987;12:264-268 Jensen M, Brant-Zawadzki M, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People Without Back Pain.  N Engl J Med  1994; 331: 69-116.  Vallfors B. Acute, Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Clinical Symptoms, Absenteeism and Working Environment.  Scan J Rehab Med Suppl  1985; 11: 1-98.  Jones AK. Primary care management of acute low back pain.  Nurse Pract  1997;22:50-56. McKenzie RA: The Lumbar Spine. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy.  Spinal Publications .  Waikanae, New Zealand. 1981
References Travell JG. Simons DG: Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction.  The Trigger Point Manual . Williams & Wilkins.  Baltimore. 1983. Ross, Michael H., Romrell J. Lynn, Kaye I. Gordon:  Histology: a Text and Atlas 3 rd  Edition .  Williams & Wilkins.  Baltimore. 1995.  Janda V: Muscles, motor regulation and back problems, p.27. In Korr  IM (ed.):  The Neurological Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy .  Plenum, New York.  1978. Dvork J. Dvorak V:  Manual Medicine:  Diagnostics.  Georg Thieme Verlag.  Thieme-Stratton Struttgart . 1984.  Kirkaldy-Willis WH.  Hill RJ:  A more precise diagnosis for low back pain.  Spine  4:102. 1979. Richardson, C A (1992).  Muscle Imbalance: Principles of treatment and assessment.  Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists Challenges Conference.  Christchurch, New Zealand. Aspden, R M (1992).  Review of the functional anatomy of the spinal ligaments and the lumbar erector spinae muscles.  Clinical Anatomy . 5. 372-387.
References Hides. J A, Stokes. M J, Saide. M, Jull. G A and Cooper. D H (1994).  Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acut/subacute low back pain.  Spine . 19. 2. 165-172. Jull. G A and Richardson, G A (1994).  Rehabilitation of active stabilization of the lumbar spine in: Twomey, L T and Taylor. L T (eds)  Physical Therapy of the Low Back, 2 nd  Ed . Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. Elnaggar IM, Nordin M, Sheikhzadeh A, Parnianpour M, Kahanovitz N.  Effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises on low-back painand spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients.  Spine  1991;16:967-72. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H.  The lumbar Multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar inververtebral disc herniation.  Spine  1993;5:568-74. Lehto M, Hurme M, Alaranta H, et al:  Connective tissue changes of the multifidus in patients with lumbar disc herniation.  Spine  14:302-309, 1989. Lindboe CF, Platou CS:  Disuse atrophy of human skeletal muscle.  Acta neuropathol (Berlin) 56:241-44, 1982.
References Gardenar-Morse M, Stokes I.  The effect of abdominal muscle coactivation on the lumbar spine stability.  Spine . 1998;23:86-92. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, et al.  A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain.  N England J Med  1998;339;1021-9. Davies J, Gibson T, Tester L.  The value of exercises in the treatment of low back pain.  Rheumatol Rehabilitation  1979;18:243-47. Andersson C, Chaffin D, Herrin C, Matthews L.  A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral joint during lifting activities.  Journ Biomech  1985;18:578-84. Bogduk N, MacIntosh J.  The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia.  Spine  1984;9:164-70. Magee J D.  Orthopedic Physical Assessment 3 rd  Ed .  W.B. Saunders Co. 1997.  Lieberson C.  Rehabilitation of the spine .  Williams & Wilkins:  Baltimore; 1996
Low Back Pain Quiz

Low back pain

  • 1.
    BACK PAIN MANAGEMENTQuoc To Ai Giang D.C.
  • 2.
    Statistics 75-85% ofAmericans will suffer from LBP once in their lifetime 90% will improve w/out surgery 50% of those who have an episode will have a recurrent episode within 1 year 5.4 million workers will be disabled for 1 or more years from LBP NeuroSurgery Today March 2006
  • 3.
    Sacroiliac Joint Lumbo-sacraljoint complex functions as a self-compensating mechanism which accommodates, mitigates, balances, stores and redirects forces affecting the pelvis and spine. Forces: gravity, weight bearing, inertia, rotation, acc/deceleration, ground reactive forces
  • 4.
    Sacroiliac Joint SIjoint is essential for load transfer between spine and legs Slight changes in the mobility or stability can be responsible for variety of clinical conditions
  • 5.
    Sacroiliac Joint Pathologyin this joint has been reported in numerous of inflammatory, metabolic, and infective disorders Yet mechanical dysfunctions of this joint remains controversial, largely due to our lack of knowledge about the joint
  • 6.
    Sacroiliac Joint Composedof 2 innominate bones and a sacrum forming 2 SI joints and pubic symphysis Ligaments, joint capsule, muscle, fascia, articular configuration
  • 7.
    Sacroiliac Joint SacrumA tilted wedge or keystone The weight of the spine coupled with gravity forces the sacrum to wedge snugly between the two innominates. This phenomenon along with other passive anatomical features that provide stability are called form closure .
  • 8.
    Form Closure Osteoarticulo-ligamentouscomponent “ Refers to a stable situation with closely fitting joint surfaces, where no extra forces are needed to maintain the state (stability) of the system” Vleeming
  • 9.
    Stabilization of thepelvis via ligamentous structures Ligamentous Structures
  • 10.
    Sacroiliac Joint SIJoint Surfaces: Sacrum: The articular surface, called auricular, is concave, covered in thick hyaline cartilage and is shaped like a plane propeller - wider P-A in the upper aspect and wider A-P in the lower aspect . Ilium: Controversy exists as to if the iliac side is fibrocartilage or hyaline. Either way, its convex surface is irregular (rough). Shape of the SIJ effectively resists flexion.
  • 11.
    Sacroiliac Joint Ligaments- designed to limit the mobility of the SI joint. The ligaments must oppose strong forces for long periods of time. Simonian noted the strength of the ligaments by cutting through the pubic symphysis and the iliac wings only flared out slightly.
  • 12.
    Sacroiliac Joint IliolumbarLigament: limits axial rotation and anterior glide of L5 on the sacrum. Sacrotuberous Ligament: resists sacral movement into nutation, (tightens the ligament). It also has as an important connection to the long head of the biceps femoris. Sacrospinal Ligament: see #2 Dorsal Sacral Iliac Ligament: this large ligament tightens in counter-nutation. It makes up 2/3 of the posterior SI connections and blends with #2, erector spinae and thoracolumbar fascia. 1 2 4 4 3
  • 13.
    Sacroiliac Joint AnteriorSacroiliac Ligament: opposes axial translation of the sacrum and separation of the SI joints. Interosseous Ligament (not shown): fills in the irregular spaces posterior and superior to the joint; resists joint separation. 5
  • 14.
    Sacroiliac Joint -Capsule Superior portion is a caudal extension of the iliolumbar ligament Anterior portion is dense connective tissue and caudally blends with the sacrospinous ligament Posterior portion is made up of multiple interwoven bands (interosseous ligaments) 5
  • 15.
    Sacroiliac Joint -Innervation Anterior superior joint receives info. from spinal nerves L4 & 5 Anterior inferior joint supplied by S1 & 2 and other sacral nerves 5
  • 16.
    Sacroiliac Joint Muscles:The major muscles and fascia that are involved in the SI joint are the gluteus maximus and medius, psoas, piriformis multifidus , latissimus dorsi, abdominal obliques, transversus abdominus , biceps femoris , l atissimus dorsi , pelvic floor & diaphragm and thoracolumbar fascia. The forces created by the muscles acting on SI joint to provide stability is called Fo rce Closure.
  • 17.
    Force Closure “Force closure refers to a system whereby additional forces are necessary to maintain the joint in place.” J. Snijders Second Interdisciplinary Word Congress on Low Back Pain – San Diego 1995
  • 18.
    Force Closure ErectorSpinali Extends spine and pelvis Contraction creates sacral nutation (locking) thus ligaments tighten and SI joint locks
  • 19.
    Force Closure MultifidiTendon pass above interosseous ligament and inserts into sacrum, iliac crest, and sacrotuberous ligament Contraction facilitates nutation
  • 20.
    Force Closure GluteusMaximus Hip extensor Directly compresses SI joint due to fiber orientation Fibers blend with sacrotuberous ligament and thoracolumbar fascia
  • 21.
    Form Closure LatissimusDorsi Extends, abducts, and medially rotate humerus Deep fibers: lower T/S spinous processes and iliac crest Superficial fibers: oblique caudal fibers blend with thoracolumbar fascia and then contralateral gluteal muscles
  • 22.
    Force Closure Bicepsfemoris Long head crosses over the ischeal tuberosity & blends into sacrotuberous ligament Contraction increases sacrotuberous tension
  • 23.
    Force Closure PiriformisExternally rotates femur Crosses SI joint perpendicular & compresses the joint
  • 24.
    Force Closure PsoasQuadratus Lumborum
  • 25.
    Force Closure AdominalsThe Transverse Abdominals wrap around the spine and goes all the way to the front and when activated it stabilizes the spine and pelvis
  • 26.
    Force Closure Thoracolumbarfascia Clinical of importance in surgery, it blends with the deep cervical fascia which forms a plane for infection to travel
  • 27.
    Force Closure AbdominalsTransverse Abdominals Deepest of the 3 layers Perhaps the most functional for core stabilization, spinal stabilization
  • 28.
    Joint Functions If joint is compressed this will result in restriction If joint is not compressed enough this will result in instability or hypermobility If joint does not function in a smooth & efficient manner this can result in abnormal firing patterns
  • 29.
    Joint Functions ThePanjabi Model as modified by Vleeming & Lee
  • 30.
    Integration Jointfunction requires normal function of the joint & of the muscles Form Closure Force Closure Joint restriction can be due to muscular and ligamentous elements Local stabilizers vs. Global stabilizers & global maximizers
  • 31.
    Inner Core Tranversus Abdominus Lumbar Multifidi Pelvic Floor Diaphragm
  • 32.
    The Tranversus Abdominus Pre-Anticipatory Damaged by: Surgery Overactive Rectus Pendulant Abdomen The rest of the inner unit
  • 33.
    Lumbar Multifidi Shut off after 3 minutes in slumped posture Atrophy occurs in most of modern (sitting) society Mass is replaced by fatty infiltration
  • 34.
    Pelvic Floor Damaged by childbirth – a normal vaginal delivery Is affected by the other inner unit muscles not functioning Puborectalis – a muscle of the pelvic floor can be overactive as a consequence of rectus over-activity which is itself a product of Tranversus Abdominus weakness
  • 35.
    3 Phases toLBP Rehabilitation Phase I: Acute Phase Physiatrist and treatment team focus on making a diagnosis, developing an appropriate treatment plan, and implementing the treatment regimen to reduce the initial low back pain and source of inflammation. This may include any/all of the items listed above and/or the utilization of ultrasound, electrical stimulation, or specialized injections.
  • 36.
    3 Phases toLBP Rehabilitation Phase II: Recovery Phase Once the initial pain and inflammation are better managed, the rehabilitation team then focuses on helping the patient to restore working function of the body. This includes returning the patient to normal daily activities while implementing a specialized exercise program that is designed to help the individual regain flexibility and strength.
  • 37.
    3 Phases toLBP Rehabilitation Phase III: Maintenance Phase The goal of this phase of low back pain rehabilitation is two-fold: Educating the individual on ways to prevent further injury and strain to the back Helping the individual to maintain an appropriate level of physical fitness to help further increase strength and endurance.
  • 38.
    Common Causes DiscLesions with/out Radiculopathy 98% of Disc lesions occur at L4-5 & L5-S1 Overuse, strenuous activity, or improper use (i.e., repetitive or heavy lifting, exposure to vibration for prolonged periods of time) Trauma/injury/fracture Degeneration of vertebrae (often caused by stresses on the muscles and ligaments that support the spine, or the effects of instability.
  • 39.
    Common Causes InfectionAbnormal growth (tumor) Obesity (often caused by increased weight on the spine and pressure on the discs) Poor muscle tone in the back
  • 40.
    Common Causes Muscletension or spasm Sprain or strain Ligament or muscle tears Joint problems Smoking (damage to the vasculatures of discs) Disease (i.e., osteoarthritis, spondylitis, compression fractures)
  • 41.
    – a termthat encapsulates all the possible causes of joint changes Movement Dysfunction
  • 42.
    – impliessome holding element that restricts movement - possible candidates : muscle, ligament or capsular change due to some past trauma to the tissue Joint Fixation or Restriction
  • 43.
    a. Capsular& Ligamentous Changes following trauma & the inflammatory cascade Clinical Orthopedics, 1987, Akeson, Amiel, Abel, Garfin & Woo (for an overview see the Aging Body by Morgenthal & Boughie – Chapter 3 b. Trigger Points / Myofascial Changes Travell & Simons – Myofascial Pain & Dysfunction – the Trigger Point Manual Volume 1 & 2 c. Muscle Imbalances Janda d. Alterations in the Arthrokinetic Reflex Cassidy / Mooney Movement Dysfunction Causes:
  • 44.
    Cassidy / MooneyBased on Hilton’s law, the nerves that innervate a joint innervate the muscles around the joint. If there's a problem within the joint the surrounding muscles will be weakened or shut off. This has been proposed as a primary mechanism of dysfunction in all areas of the spine. 1.) SI joint dysfunction and glute inhibition, (Bernard and Cassidy 91) 2.) Lumbar joint dysfunction and multifidus inhibition, (Hides 96) 3.) Cervical spine and L. coli (longissimus coli muscle) inhibition, (Wright, Jull 2001) 4.) Vastus medialis inhibition after knee joint dysfunction, (Richardson PhD thesis) Alterations in the Arthrokinetic Reflex
  • 45.
    Directional Instability Nutationvs. Counternutation Dominance Sacrotuberus ligament Checks Nutation Long & Short Sacroiliac ligaments Checks Counternutation Nutation Counternutation Nutation Counternutation
  • 46.
    Assessments Functionally puttingthe puzzle together: We need to be able to assess the complaints through functional testing.
  • 47.
    Orthopedic (Functional) Exams/AssessmentsAcute Vs. Chronic Determine if the problem is an acute vs. chronic complaint
  • 48.
    Gillet’s Test Performedknee to chest while standing: Pull knees alternately to chest. The PSIS that moves down the furthest in relation to the opposite one is the unblocked side. The blocked side will come very little or appear to move cephalically. Recruitment is from the bottom up. Hip flexion must be at least 90 degrees.
  • 49.
  • 50.
    Piedallu’s Sign :The movement of the posterior superior iliac spines upon forward flexion. A positive Piedallu’s sign is asymetrical movement.
  • 51.
    Gaelen’s Test: Thepatient lies on the side with the upper leg (test leg) hyperextended at the hip (1st photo). The patient holds the lower leg flexed against the chest. The examiner stabilizes the pelvis while extending the hip of the uppermost leg. The test can also be performed supine (2nd) but this position may limit the amount of hyperextension. Position patient so the test hip extends beyond the edge pf the table. Then draw up both legs onto the chest then slowly lower the test leg into extension. Pain in the sacroiliac joints indicates a positive test.
  • 52.
  • 53.
    Gait How canwe incorporate static anatomy into functional anatomy?
  • 54.
    Gait – HeelStrike Prior to heel strike, heel strike becomes active Which increases tension of sacrotuberous ligament Thus compresses SI joint Forces transmitted across SI joint into spine
  • 55.
    Gait – StancePhase Innominates begin anterior rotation counter-nutation begins Loose SI joint. locking Long Dorsal SI ligament tension increases Need to stabilize SI joint Gluteus maximus activates and replaces Biceps femoris Contralateral lats dorsi activates
  • 56.
    Gait – SwingPhase No weight in SI joint. It is suspended. Ligamentous control of SI joint
  • 57.
    Gait With EachPhase of Gait Opposite arm and “wringing of spine” (it occurs like taking a rubber band and twisting it, when you let go, it “springs”) Ligaments, discs, and spinal curves maximize yielding energy storage Elastic Energy is released in the next cycle —followed by muscular energy
  • 58.
    Treatment Treatment shouldbe inclusive to include all the tissues that can affect movement. Each treatment should be tailor made to fit the patients dysfunction, manipulation, mobilization, rehabilitation, stretching & diet/nutrition should a part of every doctor’s practice regiment.
  • 59.
    Treatments Activity modification Medication Physical rehabilitation and/or therapy Occupational therapy Weight loss (if overweight)
  • 60.
  • 61.
    Treatments Following aprevention program (as directed by your physician) Quit smoking Surgery Assistive devices (i.e., mechanical back supports)
  • 62.
  • 63.
    Application With allour knowledge in anatomy we need to learn how to apply it to the patient who is having pain after all the treatments they’ve had. Extensive connections of sacrotuberous ligaments Gluteus Maximus Piriformis Bicep Femoris Multifidi Thoracolumbar Fascia
  • 64.
    Application SI jointis located in the middle of considerable force streams Mechanoreceptors Dysfunctional of Form/Force Closure can have significant effects locally at the SI joint and far into the lower/upper limbs or cervical spine. Loss of bracing Shifting of loads into the lumbar/sacral area
  • 65.
    Applications Often theseconnections are incomplete, unilateral or asymetrical I.E. - Unilateral shorten biceps Could these differences cause symptoms in the patient? The answer is YES!
  • 66.
    Applications Our goalis to find these differences Evaluations of: Trigger Points Hyper/Hypotonicity Myofascial bands Decrease muscle length Pain
  • 67.
    Applications These imbalanceswill change the function of the SI joints and L/S as a UNIT FAILED SELF BRACING “ Abnormal movement of the sacrum in the SI joints may lead to abnormal stress loads transmitted into the L/S thus abnormal stress on the intervertebral discs and joints.” - Vleeming
  • 68.
    Failed Self BracingImbalances Weak erector spinae leads to insufficient nutation Weak gluteus maximus leads to insufficient SI compression Weak Lats leads to insufficient SI compression Decreased SI joint. compression & poor nutation leads to dysfunction and pain syndromes
  • 69.
    Failed Self BracingSustained counter-nutation leads to: Absent SI compression therefore increasing joint shear forces Lordosis is lost Load is transferred to L/S and discs…increasing shear
  • 70.
    Failed Self BracingIrritation of the SI joint inhibits the gluteus maximus Inhibition = weakness Hamstring will attempt to increase hip extension and help increase SI joint compression shorten stride
  • 71.
    References Lee DG,Vleeming A. Impaired load transfer through the pelvic girdle, a new model of altered neutral zone function. Proceedings from the 3 rd Interdisciplinary Word Congress on Low Back and Pelvic pain . Vienna 1998;76-81. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transverse abdominus. Spine 1996;21(22):2640-50. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Physical Therapy . 1997;77:132-44. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Lee D. Alteration of the sacroiliac joint motion patterns in subjects with pelvic motion asymetry. Proceedings from the 4 th World Interdisciplinary Congress on low back and pelvic pain. Montreal 2001. Lee DG. The pelvic girdle, 2 nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgh 1999. Lee DG. Treatment of pelvic instability. Movement, stability, and low back pain . Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. 1997;37:445-459. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;5(4):383-89.
  • 72.
    References Deyo RA,Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA . 1992;268:760-765. Papagerogiou AC, Croft PR, Ferry S, et al. Estimating the prevalence of low back in the general population: evidence from the South Machester back pain survey. Spine . 1995;17:1889-1894. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu JY. Descriptiv epidemiology of low back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine . 1987;12:264-268 Jensen M, Brant-Zawadzki M, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People Without Back Pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 69-116. Vallfors B. Acute, Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Clinical Symptoms, Absenteeism and Working Environment. Scan J Rehab Med Suppl 1985; 11: 1-98. Jones AK. Primary care management of acute low back pain. Nurse Pract 1997;22:50-56. McKenzie RA: The Lumbar Spine. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Spinal Publications . Waikanae, New Zealand. 1981
  • 73.
    References Travell JG.Simons DG: Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction. The Trigger Point Manual . Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore. 1983. Ross, Michael H., Romrell J. Lynn, Kaye I. Gordon: Histology: a Text and Atlas 3 rd Edition . Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore. 1995. Janda V: Muscles, motor regulation and back problems, p.27. In Korr IM (ed.): The Neurological Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy . Plenum, New York. 1978. Dvork J. Dvorak V: Manual Medicine: Diagnostics. Georg Thieme Verlag. Thieme-Stratton Struttgart . 1984. Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Hill RJ: A more precise diagnosis for low back pain. Spine 4:102. 1979. Richardson, C A (1992). Muscle Imbalance: Principles of treatment and assessment. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists Challenges Conference. Christchurch, New Zealand. Aspden, R M (1992). Review of the functional anatomy of the spinal ligaments and the lumbar erector spinae muscles. Clinical Anatomy . 5. 372-387.
  • 74.
    References Hides. JA, Stokes. M J, Saide. M, Jull. G A and Cooper. D H (1994). Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acut/subacute low back pain. Spine . 19. 2. 165-172. Jull. G A and Richardson, G A (1994). Rehabilitation of active stabilization of the lumbar spine in: Twomey, L T and Taylor. L T (eds) Physical Therapy of the Low Back, 2 nd Ed . Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. Elnaggar IM, Nordin M, Sheikhzadeh A, Parnianpour M, Kahanovitz N. Effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises on low-back painand spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients. Spine 1991;16:967-72. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H. The lumbar Multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar inververtebral disc herniation. Spine 1993;5:568-74. Lehto M, Hurme M, Alaranta H, et al: Connective tissue changes of the multifidus in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Spine 14:302-309, 1989. Lindboe CF, Platou CS: Disuse atrophy of human skeletal muscle. Acta neuropathol (Berlin) 56:241-44, 1982.
  • 75.
    References Gardenar-Morse M,Stokes I. The effect of abdominal muscle coactivation on the lumbar spine stability. Spine . 1998;23:86-92. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, et al. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N England J Med 1998;339;1021-9. Davies J, Gibson T, Tester L. The value of exercises in the treatment of low back pain. Rheumatol Rehabilitation 1979;18:243-47. Andersson C, Chaffin D, Herrin C, Matthews L. A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral joint during lifting activities. Journ Biomech 1985;18:578-84. Bogduk N, MacIntosh J. The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine 1984;9:164-70. Magee J D. Orthopedic Physical Assessment 3 rd Ed . W.B. Saunders Co. 1997. Lieberson C. Rehabilitation of the spine . Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore; 1996
  • 76.

Editor's Notes

  • #30 Get explanation of panjabi model
  • #54 Add in answer to question
  • #62 Get treatment handouts
  • #63 Expand