This presentation was provided by Rachel Lewellen of Harvard University during the NISO event, Assessment Practices and Metrics in the 21st Century Training Session Four held on Friday, November 9th.
6. Context Matters
• Relative to total
• Relative to campus
• Relative to peers
• Relative to capacity (spaces)
• Relative to other factors (per student, per
faculty)
7. Categories
• Who
– Undergraduates
– Graduates
– Faculty
– Staff
– School, college or
department
– Other demographic
categories
• What
– Books
– Digital collections
– Images
– E-resources
– Equipment
– Rooms
– Services
11. Mapping
• On-campus
– In library spaces
– In other spaces
• Off-campus
– Local
– Far away
• Collaborative or quiet study
• Open stacks, storage, or partner libraries
15. Art Traffic at the Louvre
A study of visitors’ behavior using Bluetooth data
http://senseable.mit.edu/louvre/#
https://youtu.be/rRjWaH1QHJU
16. Time Series Data
• Time of day
• Day of week
• Week number
• Month
• By semester
• During extended hours
• By cyclical periods (exams, spring break, grant
periods)
• Calendar year/fiscal year
• Project tracking
24. Numerical
• Total (sum) – items,
dollars, terabytes,
images, feet
• Difference
• Unique counts
• Mean (average)
• Median (middle)
• Mode (most frequently
occurring)
• Percent change
• Percent of total
• Year over year
• Percent capacity
• Distance to goal
• Cost per use
• Other ratios
• Key performance
indicators (KPI)
41. The danger of mixing up causality and correlation: Ionica Smeets at TEDxDelft
https://youtu.be/8B271L3NtAw
42. Evidence to Establish Causality
• Association
– Is there a relationship, is there a correlation?
– Is x related to y?
• Direction of influence
– Temporal factors (chicken and the egg)
– Does x come first?
• Absence of alternative explanations
– Non-spuriousness
46. Benchmarking
• Benchmarking is a comparison of performance
measures between similar entities and/or
against recognized standards.
• Library benchmarks are typically comparisons
of numerical (quantitative) statistics such as
circulation, visits, and revenues.
https://ivygroup.com/blog/benchmarking-library-performance/
47. How Benchmarking Works
• Select an aspect, service or process to benchmark
• Identify the key performance metrics
• Choose comparison group to benchmark
• Collect data on performance and practices
• Analyze the data and identify opportunities for
improvement
• Adapt and implement the best practices, setting
reasonable goals and ensuring organizational
acceptance
48. Examples of Library Benchmarking
• Resource Comparison
– Funding levels
– % of budget on collections or format
– Size and type of staff
• Service models
– Reference service models
– Writing center collaborations
– Learning Commons
– Copyright services
• Reorganization
– Administrative structure
– Department alignments
• Best Practices
– Recruitment and retention
– Improve printing
– Staff training programs
49. Comparison Groups
• Institutional defined peer group
• Demographics
• Within consortia
• Other characteristics
• Leaders or by reputation
50. Sources of Benchmarking Data
• Integrated Postsecondary Education Data
System (IPEDS)
• The Association of College and Research Libraries
(ACRL)
• Association of Research Libraries (ARL)
• Standardized surveys (LibQUAL, MISO, Ithaka,
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE),
Common Data Set (CDS)
• Email, phone calls and site visits
52. Build a Culture of Assessment
• Takes time
• Transparency with data
• Communication about data use
• Highlight examples of data use
• Build trust
• Data as information not as a judgement
53. Practices
• Explicitly acknowledge when data is used
– Highlight positive outcomes big and small
• Support data allies and champions
– Honor and recognize data practitioners and
practices
• Normalize everyday data use
– Include data competencies and practices in all job
descriptions
• Communication and transparency
54. Interpersonal Effectiveness
• Validate and understand concerns
• Acknowledge limitations of data when
appropriate
• Be trustworthy
– Professional credibility
– Personal credibility
• Be reasonable
• Be a leader
• Best change management strategies