The document provides an overview of facilitation skills and techniques for leading effective meetings, including determining group expectations, managing discussions, addressing conflicts, and documenting outcomes. It discusses tools for generating, evaluating, and deciding on ideas as well as techniques for designing meetings, establishing ground rules, and creating a safe environment for participation. The presentation aims to equip meeting leaders with best practices for facilitating inclusive and productive discussions.
The document discusses strategies for successful business meetings. It defines meetings as gatherings where 2 or more people discuss issues to find solutions or make recommendations. There are three types of meetings: informational meetings to present information, suggested solution meetings where options are discussed, and problem solving meetings where an issue is presented, solutions generated, and a decision made. The document provides guidance on planning meetings, conducting them effectively, and following up afterwards. It also outlines best practices for meeting leadership and participant responsibilities.
The document discusses several techniques for group decision making including nominal group think, Delphi technique, and stepladder technique which aim to generate ideas from all group members without direct interaction, paired comparison analysis and grid analysis to evaluate options based on weighted factors, and plus/minus/interesting and six thinking hats to analyze decisions from different perspectives. It also analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of different methods for making decisions by authority, experts, averaging opinions, or minority rule.
This document provides guidance on how to effectively plan and conduct meetings. It discusses determining the purpose and attendees of a meeting. It also outlines best practices for the meeting structure, including using an agenda, establishing ground rules, and assigning roles like facilitator, recorder, and manager. Key aspects covered during the meeting include respecting the agenda, being outcome-oriented, and taking minutes. Follow-up after the meeting involves summarizing decisions made and next steps assigned with deadlines. Managing difficult situations that may arise and ensuring the meeting stays on track to achieve its goals are also addressed.
Group decision making involves individuals collectively choosing from alternatives. It can occur through consensus of all members or a majority vote. The process involves diagnosing the problem, developing alternatives, evaluating options, and implementing the chosen decision. While time-consuming, group decisions benefit from diverse perspectives and skills; however, influential members can manipulate the outcome. Techniques like brainstorming, nominal group technique, Delphi method, and consensus mapping provide structured processes for group decision making.
A framework for workshop facilitation - UX Ireland 2016Matthew Ovington
How many workshops have you been to that are poorly thought out or badly run, that drift aimlessly or have vague outcomes?
Workshop facilitation is a design skill that you can apply in all kinds of situations including ideation, gathering requirements and building consensus with cross functional teams. It's also an essential skill for anyone trying to reconcile differing viewpoints or align diverse needs.
This session will provide you with:
an understanding of what facilitation is and when to use it
an easy to remember framework for planning workshops
tips and tricks for making workshops go smoothly
ways to build trust, encourage participation and stay focused on outcomes
The document discusses several group decision making techniques: majority rule, minority rule, decision by authority, nominal group technique, Delphi technique, and electronic meeting. It provides an overview of the key steps and advantages/disadvantages of each technique. The conclusion recommends that managers evaluate their group and situation to select the best technique for their objectives.
The document provides information about groups and effective participation in groups. It discusses the types, purposes, and benefits of groups. It also outlines the typical stages of group development and roles that individuals take on in groups. The document emphasizes the importance of planning, problem-solving, and having discussions in a cooperative and organized manner. It notes that disagreements can be productive if handled well. It describes an assignment where students will work in groups to write, film, and present a mock 10-minute news broadcast with different segments. They must decide responsibilities and have initial plans submitted.
This is the presentation slide deck for my 45 minute talk at TriAgile; it discusses how anyone can lead change and gives some techniques that can be used.
The document discusses strategies for successful business meetings. It defines meetings as gatherings where 2 or more people discuss issues to find solutions or make recommendations. There are three types of meetings: informational meetings to present information, suggested solution meetings where options are discussed, and problem solving meetings where an issue is presented, solutions generated, and a decision made. The document provides guidance on planning meetings, conducting them effectively, and following up afterwards. It also outlines best practices for meeting leadership and participant responsibilities.
The document discusses several techniques for group decision making including nominal group think, Delphi technique, and stepladder technique which aim to generate ideas from all group members without direct interaction, paired comparison analysis and grid analysis to evaluate options based on weighted factors, and plus/minus/interesting and six thinking hats to analyze decisions from different perspectives. It also analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of different methods for making decisions by authority, experts, averaging opinions, or minority rule.
This document provides guidance on how to effectively plan and conduct meetings. It discusses determining the purpose and attendees of a meeting. It also outlines best practices for the meeting structure, including using an agenda, establishing ground rules, and assigning roles like facilitator, recorder, and manager. Key aspects covered during the meeting include respecting the agenda, being outcome-oriented, and taking minutes. Follow-up after the meeting involves summarizing decisions made and next steps assigned with deadlines. Managing difficult situations that may arise and ensuring the meeting stays on track to achieve its goals are also addressed.
Group decision making involves individuals collectively choosing from alternatives. It can occur through consensus of all members or a majority vote. The process involves diagnosing the problem, developing alternatives, evaluating options, and implementing the chosen decision. While time-consuming, group decisions benefit from diverse perspectives and skills; however, influential members can manipulate the outcome. Techniques like brainstorming, nominal group technique, Delphi method, and consensus mapping provide structured processes for group decision making.
A framework for workshop facilitation - UX Ireland 2016Matthew Ovington
How many workshops have you been to that are poorly thought out or badly run, that drift aimlessly or have vague outcomes?
Workshop facilitation is a design skill that you can apply in all kinds of situations including ideation, gathering requirements and building consensus with cross functional teams. It's also an essential skill for anyone trying to reconcile differing viewpoints or align diverse needs.
This session will provide you with:
an understanding of what facilitation is and when to use it
an easy to remember framework for planning workshops
tips and tricks for making workshops go smoothly
ways to build trust, encourage participation and stay focused on outcomes
The document discusses several group decision making techniques: majority rule, minority rule, decision by authority, nominal group technique, Delphi technique, and electronic meeting. It provides an overview of the key steps and advantages/disadvantages of each technique. The conclusion recommends that managers evaluate their group and situation to select the best technique for their objectives.
The document provides information about groups and effective participation in groups. It discusses the types, purposes, and benefits of groups. It also outlines the typical stages of group development and roles that individuals take on in groups. The document emphasizes the importance of planning, problem-solving, and having discussions in a cooperative and organized manner. It notes that disagreements can be productive if handled well. It describes an assignment where students will work in groups to write, film, and present a mock 10-minute news broadcast with different segments. They must decide responsibilities and have initial plans submitted.
This is the presentation slide deck for my 45 minute talk at TriAgile; it discusses how anyone can lead change and gives some techniques that can be used.
This document discusses meetings, teams, conflicts and interventions. It provides an overview of primary and secondary tensions in groups, counterproductive tendencies like conformity, and types of interventions. It also discusses characteristics of effective leadership, types of presentations like panels and symposia, and steps to create a quality team presentation.
The document discusses group decision making processes. It defines group decision making as when multiple individuals collectively analyze problems, consider alternative solutions, and select a solution. The document outlines several key aspects of group decision making, including:
- Groups can range in size from 2-7 people and members may be demographically similar or diverse.
- Groups use structured or unstructured processes to discuss alternatives and arrive at decisions.
- Factors like group size, composition, and external pressures impact group functioning.
- Common group decision making methods include brainstorming, consensus building, and nominal group technique.
- Group decision making has advantages like tapping diverse expertise but also risks like groupthink.
This document discusses group decision making, including its strengths and weaknesses. It examines techniques for group decision making like brainstorming, nominal group technique, and electronic meetings. It also covers the concepts of groupthink and group shift. Groupthink occurs when group pressures lead to deteriorating judgment, testing of ideas against external standards, and ethical decision making. It can result in irrational and dehumanizing actions. Group shift is when group discussions cause members to take more extreme positions than they initially held individually.
Group discussions are used for recruitment, decision making, and problem solving. They involve an exchange of ideas among individuals in a group setting. Key aspects of effective group discussions include setting guidelines, allowing all members to participate, maintaining focus on the topic, and reaching consensus or a decision. Leadership roles include facilitating participation, ensuring no one dominates, and summarizing discussions. Common techniques used in group discussions are brainstorming, where many ideas are generated, and the Delphi method, which uses anonymous questionnaires with experts.
Group Decision Making Techniques - These techniques are only useful to improve the Group decision making.
1. Brainstorming
2. Nominal Group Technique
3. Delphi Technique
4. Consensus Mapping
Reference - "Principles and Practice of Management" L.M.Prasad
This document discusses various group decision making techniques:
- Brainstorming is used to generate many ideas without criticism by building on others' suggestions.
- The Nominal Group Technique involves individually and silently listing ideas which are then discussed without criticism.
- The Delphi Technique gathers experts' judgments anonymously through structured questionnaires to forecast events.
- Devil's Advocacy assigns a role to criticize proposed decisions to avoid mistakes. Electronic meetings allow remote interaction through computers.
Presentation by Mariska Kappmeier (University of Hamburg): "More Than Words – Establishing Sustainability in Group Discussion", at Forum for Cities in Transition annual conference, Mitrovica, 24-28 May 2010
Group Exercise_Best Practices for Meetingsdaniel_hart
I developed this exercise for a technical writing class. It helped students work together and was an excellent introduction to best practices for meetings.
Difficult conversations in creative environmentsSkmcclintock
The document is a transcript from a presentation on mastering difficult conversations in creative environments. It discusses best practices for communication, types of challenging personalities and situations that may be faced, and techniques for handling them. These include being positive, setting expectations, asking questions, and focusing on solutions rather than problems. Sample difficult scenarios are also outlined, like dealing with poor team performance or defensive stakeholders during design reviews.
For LTEC 4000: Module 8 - Facilitation Strategies, Tools, and Overview
Reference:
Bens, I. (2012). Facilitating with ease! Core skills for facilitators, team leaders and members, managers, consultants, and trainers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (ISBN: 9781118107744) Course syllabus Reference: (Bens)
This document discusses conflict resolution techniques for managing team conflicts. It describes 5 primary conflict resolution styles: avoiding (turtle), accommodating (teddy bear), competing (shark), compromising (fox), and collaborating (owl). Each style has advantages and disadvantages. The document also identifies unhealthy behaviors to avoid in conflicts, such as contempt, unhealthy criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling, and provides suggestions for resolving conflicts constructively.
This document discusses the nominal group technique (NGT), which is a structured method for small groups to generate ideas, discuss them, and come to a consensus without one person dominating. The summary is:
The nominal group technique (NGT) is a method for structured small group discussions to generate ideas, discuss them, and prioritize them to reach consensus. It involves individuals privately writing down ideas, then sharing in round-robin format without debate. Ideas are then discussed and privately voted on to determine the highest priorities of the group. NGT encourages participation and prevents domination by any one person. It has advantages of generating more ideas and achieving consensus over traditional group discussions.
The supervisor is unsure of the direction of the group and their ability to accomplish goals. After evaluating alternatives, the supervisor chooses to take steps to direct subordinates to work in a well-defined manner. This will provide guidelines for the group to systematically achieve targets. The supervisor will implement this by leading the group and pushing them to adhere to guidelines. Ongoing evaluation of the group's direction will allow the supervisor to assess the impact of the implemented decision.
This was a test guide I prepared for one of my classes (COMM 265G) Principles of Communication at NMSU-A. The instructor was Prof. Jim Gallagher Ph. D.
The document discusses team building and high performance teams. It defines key terms like team, team building, and teamwork. It outlines Tuckman's stages of group development and Belbin's nine team roles. It also discusses the five dysfunctions of a team and symptoms that signal a need for team building. Characteristics of good teams and high performance teams are provided, such as clear purpose, roles, leadership, processes, relationships, and communication. The objectives are to get acquainted, familiarize terms, learn stages of development, roles, dysfunctions, and characteristics of good/high performance teams.
The document discusses meetings, teams, and interventions for managing conflicts within groups. It provides details on:
- Common issues that arise in meetings like wasting time and lack of updates when people skip meetings.
- The values of meetings like announcing changes, developing solutions, and gaining acceptance of decisions.
- Tensions that can happen in teams like anxiety over work or abilities (primary tension) and issues over processes, inequality, or dislikes (secondary tension).
- Counterproductive tendencies like conformity, ethnocentrism, inadequate agendas, competition vs cooperation, and tolerating vagueness.
- Types of interventions leaders can use like buzz groups, brainstorming, and having clear procedures and responsibilities
The document discusses various topics related to groups, including definitions of groups, types of groups, factors affecting group behavior, stages of group development, and approaches to group decision making. It provides definitions for key group-related concepts such as norms, roles, status, and cohesiveness. It also summarizes five stages of group development proposed by Bruce Tuckman: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Different techniques for group decision making are outlined, including brainstorming, nominal group technique, Delphi technique, and didactic interaction. Sources of conflict within groups and steps to resolve conflicts are briefly described.
Delegation and Conflict Management: A Mini-WorkshopKaren S Calhoun
This presentation is designed to teach principles and processes associated with delegating tasks and managing organizational conflict. It underpins a two-hour workshop that is part of Pitt’s University Library System (ULS) Leadership Program. The workshop exercises reinforce the skills of delegating tasks and managing conflicts contextually, using a variety of approaches.
This document provides an overview of facilitation best practices. It discusses the role of the facilitator in guiding discussion and managing group dynamics. Key parts of preparation include creating an agenda with objectives and deliverables. During sessions, the facilitator should ask questions to guide participation, capture content, and deal with challenging behaviors diplomatically. A variety of tools are presented for generating, organizing, and evaluating ideas as a group. The overall goal is for the facilitator to help diverse participants develop shared solutions efficiently.
This document discusses the role and skills of a facilitator in enabling groups to succeed. It outlines that facilitation focuses on designing and managing group processes, ensuring participation and that the process affects outcomes. The key roles of a facilitator include preparing for and managing meetings, following up, and using their skills and knowledge of group dynamics, decision making and adult learning to guide the group effectively.
This document discusses meetings, teams, conflicts and interventions. It provides an overview of primary and secondary tensions in groups, counterproductive tendencies like conformity, and types of interventions. It also discusses characteristics of effective leadership, types of presentations like panels and symposia, and steps to create a quality team presentation.
The document discusses group decision making processes. It defines group decision making as when multiple individuals collectively analyze problems, consider alternative solutions, and select a solution. The document outlines several key aspects of group decision making, including:
- Groups can range in size from 2-7 people and members may be demographically similar or diverse.
- Groups use structured or unstructured processes to discuss alternatives and arrive at decisions.
- Factors like group size, composition, and external pressures impact group functioning.
- Common group decision making methods include brainstorming, consensus building, and nominal group technique.
- Group decision making has advantages like tapping diverse expertise but also risks like groupthink.
This document discusses group decision making, including its strengths and weaknesses. It examines techniques for group decision making like brainstorming, nominal group technique, and electronic meetings. It also covers the concepts of groupthink and group shift. Groupthink occurs when group pressures lead to deteriorating judgment, testing of ideas against external standards, and ethical decision making. It can result in irrational and dehumanizing actions. Group shift is when group discussions cause members to take more extreme positions than they initially held individually.
Group discussions are used for recruitment, decision making, and problem solving. They involve an exchange of ideas among individuals in a group setting. Key aspects of effective group discussions include setting guidelines, allowing all members to participate, maintaining focus on the topic, and reaching consensus or a decision. Leadership roles include facilitating participation, ensuring no one dominates, and summarizing discussions. Common techniques used in group discussions are brainstorming, where many ideas are generated, and the Delphi method, which uses anonymous questionnaires with experts.
Group Decision Making Techniques - These techniques are only useful to improve the Group decision making.
1. Brainstorming
2. Nominal Group Technique
3. Delphi Technique
4. Consensus Mapping
Reference - "Principles and Practice of Management" L.M.Prasad
This document discusses various group decision making techniques:
- Brainstorming is used to generate many ideas without criticism by building on others' suggestions.
- The Nominal Group Technique involves individually and silently listing ideas which are then discussed without criticism.
- The Delphi Technique gathers experts' judgments anonymously through structured questionnaires to forecast events.
- Devil's Advocacy assigns a role to criticize proposed decisions to avoid mistakes. Electronic meetings allow remote interaction through computers.
Presentation by Mariska Kappmeier (University of Hamburg): "More Than Words – Establishing Sustainability in Group Discussion", at Forum for Cities in Transition annual conference, Mitrovica, 24-28 May 2010
Group Exercise_Best Practices for Meetingsdaniel_hart
I developed this exercise for a technical writing class. It helped students work together and was an excellent introduction to best practices for meetings.
Difficult conversations in creative environmentsSkmcclintock
The document is a transcript from a presentation on mastering difficult conversations in creative environments. It discusses best practices for communication, types of challenging personalities and situations that may be faced, and techniques for handling them. These include being positive, setting expectations, asking questions, and focusing on solutions rather than problems. Sample difficult scenarios are also outlined, like dealing with poor team performance or defensive stakeholders during design reviews.
For LTEC 4000: Module 8 - Facilitation Strategies, Tools, and Overview
Reference:
Bens, I. (2012). Facilitating with ease! Core skills for facilitators, team leaders and members, managers, consultants, and trainers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (ISBN: 9781118107744) Course syllabus Reference: (Bens)
This document discusses conflict resolution techniques for managing team conflicts. It describes 5 primary conflict resolution styles: avoiding (turtle), accommodating (teddy bear), competing (shark), compromising (fox), and collaborating (owl). Each style has advantages and disadvantages. The document also identifies unhealthy behaviors to avoid in conflicts, such as contempt, unhealthy criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling, and provides suggestions for resolving conflicts constructively.
This document discusses the nominal group technique (NGT), which is a structured method for small groups to generate ideas, discuss them, and come to a consensus without one person dominating. The summary is:
The nominal group technique (NGT) is a method for structured small group discussions to generate ideas, discuss them, and prioritize them to reach consensus. It involves individuals privately writing down ideas, then sharing in round-robin format without debate. Ideas are then discussed and privately voted on to determine the highest priorities of the group. NGT encourages participation and prevents domination by any one person. It has advantages of generating more ideas and achieving consensus over traditional group discussions.
The supervisor is unsure of the direction of the group and their ability to accomplish goals. After evaluating alternatives, the supervisor chooses to take steps to direct subordinates to work in a well-defined manner. This will provide guidelines for the group to systematically achieve targets. The supervisor will implement this by leading the group and pushing them to adhere to guidelines. Ongoing evaluation of the group's direction will allow the supervisor to assess the impact of the implemented decision.
This was a test guide I prepared for one of my classes (COMM 265G) Principles of Communication at NMSU-A. The instructor was Prof. Jim Gallagher Ph. D.
The document discusses team building and high performance teams. It defines key terms like team, team building, and teamwork. It outlines Tuckman's stages of group development and Belbin's nine team roles. It also discusses the five dysfunctions of a team and symptoms that signal a need for team building. Characteristics of good teams and high performance teams are provided, such as clear purpose, roles, leadership, processes, relationships, and communication. The objectives are to get acquainted, familiarize terms, learn stages of development, roles, dysfunctions, and characteristics of good/high performance teams.
The document discusses meetings, teams, and interventions for managing conflicts within groups. It provides details on:
- Common issues that arise in meetings like wasting time and lack of updates when people skip meetings.
- The values of meetings like announcing changes, developing solutions, and gaining acceptance of decisions.
- Tensions that can happen in teams like anxiety over work or abilities (primary tension) and issues over processes, inequality, or dislikes (secondary tension).
- Counterproductive tendencies like conformity, ethnocentrism, inadequate agendas, competition vs cooperation, and tolerating vagueness.
- Types of interventions leaders can use like buzz groups, brainstorming, and having clear procedures and responsibilities
The document discusses various topics related to groups, including definitions of groups, types of groups, factors affecting group behavior, stages of group development, and approaches to group decision making. It provides definitions for key group-related concepts such as norms, roles, status, and cohesiveness. It also summarizes five stages of group development proposed by Bruce Tuckman: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Different techniques for group decision making are outlined, including brainstorming, nominal group technique, Delphi technique, and didactic interaction. Sources of conflict within groups and steps to resolve conflicts are briefly described.
Delegation and Conflict Management: A Mini-WorkshopKaren S Calhoun
This presentation is designed to teach principles and processes associated with delegating tasks and managing organizational conflict. It underpins a two-hour workshop that is part of Pitt’s University Library System (ULS) Leadership Program. The workshop exercises reinforce the skills of delegating tasks and managing conflicts contextually, using a variety of approaches.
This document provides an overview of facilitation best practices. It discusses the role of the facilitator in guiding discussion and managing group dynamics. Key parts of preparation include creating an agenda with objectives and deliverables. During sessions, the facilitator should ask questions to guide participation, capture content, and deal with challenging behaviors diplomatically. A variety of tools are presented for generating, organizing, and evaluating ideas as a group. The overall goal is for the facilitator to help diverse participants develop shared solutions efficiently.
This document discusses the role and skills of a facilitator in enabling groups to succeed. It outlines that facilitation focuses on designing and managing group processes, ensuring participation and that the process affects outcomes. The key roles of a facilitator include preparing for and managing meetings, following up, and using their skills and knowledge of group dynamics, decision making and adult learning to guide the group effectively.
The document discusses how to effectively plan and conduct meetings. It recommends determining a clear purpose and desired outcomes, creating an agenda that lists items in order of importance and estimates time needed for each, and involving the right people. It also suggests designating roles like facilitator and scribe. Effective meeting participation involves preparation, being on time and engaged. The document provides tips for opening, closing and decision-making in meetings, as well as facilitation tools to help structure discussions.
Strategies for Successful Business and Group MeetingsSyed Bilal Zaidi
This document discusses strategies for successful business and group meetings. It covers the purposes and types of meetings, including informal social meetings and formal task-oriented meetings. It also discusses the typical phases a group goes through in forming - forming, storming, norming, and performing. Meeting types include informational, suggested solution, and problem-solving meetings. The document outlines leadership responsibilities in meetings such as planning, procedures, and follow-up. It also discusses participant responsibilities like preparation and taking on roles like organizer, clarifier, and idea creator. Problem-solving methods covered include background analysis, solution discovery, analysis, and choosing an action.
Facilitators help people work together more effectively. Facilitation skills are invaluable in the workplace. In this course, you will learn:
-What is facilitation and when is it needed?
-What is the role of a facilitator?
-Quick tips on preparing and executing facilitated sessions
-Activity: ‘Truthful Communication’
This document provides guidance for facilitators on managing group processes and discussions. It discusses key facilitation skills like setting expectations, maintaining focus, and helping groups build agreements. The core of facilitation involves opening discussion of a topic, narrowing considerations, and closing or transitioning. Techniques are presented for each phase like brainstorming, prioritizing, and defining next steps. Effective facilitation requires balancing attention to results, relationships, and process. The document also discusses facilitative leadership and practices like sharing vision, maximizing appropriate involvement, and celebrating accomplishments.
These 22 slides accompanied a workshop that focused on teaching the basics of a consensus process that uses cooperative dialogue. It also covered techniques for an efficient council and tools for effective community engagement.
The participants were parents interested in forming a school council, but could be useful for any group interested in using a consensus based approach for their collective decision-making.
Handouts from the workshop are available for download at http://cooptools.ca/groveworkshopsept29
Dotmocracy materials are available at www.Dotmocracy.org
Managerial Group Relationship,
A managerial group relationship refers to the dynamics and interactions among individuals who hold managerial positions within an organization. These relationships play a crucial role in shaping the overall functioning and effectiveness of the management team.
Here are some key aspects of managerial group relationships:
Communication: Effective communication is vital for building and maintaining strong relationships within a managerial group. Managers need to communicate openly, honestly, and frequently to ensure that information flows smoothly and that everyone is on the same page.
Trust and Respect: Trust and respect are the foundation of any healthy relationship, including managerial group relationships. Managers should trust and respect each other's expertise, decisions, and contributions. Trust enables collaboration, fosters teamwork, and promotes a positive work environment.
Collaboration and Cooperation: Managers within a group should work together collaboratively, rather than in silos. They should share knowledge, resources, and ideas, and collaborate on projects and problem-solving. Cooperation among managers strengthens the overall effectiveness of the management team and enhances organizational performance.
Support and Encouragement: Managers should support and encourage each other's professional growth and development. They should provide feedback, guidance, and mentoring when needed. A supportive managerial group fosters a culture of continuous learning and helps individual managers reach their full potential.
Conflict Resolution: Conflicts are inevitable in any group, including managerial teams. However, effective managerial group relationships involve the ability to handle conflicts constructively. Managers should be skilled in resolving conflicts through open dialogue, active listening, and finding win-win solutions that address the underlying issues.
Shared Goals and Vision: A strong managerial group relationship is built on shared goals and a common vision for the organization. Managers should align their objectives and strategies, ensuring that they work collectively towards the achievement of organizational objectives.
Role Clarity and Coordination: It is important for managers to have clear roles and responsibilities within the group. Role clarity helps in avoiding overlaps and ensuring smooth coordination. Managers should have a clear understanding of each other's roles and actively coordinate their efforts to maximize efficiency and minimize duplication.
Overall, a positive and effective managerial group relationship promotes a collaborative, supportive, and productive work environment. It enhances decision-making, problem-solving, and organizational performance, ultimately leading to success for the organization as a whole.
This document provides an overview of a presentation on dialogue and deliberation within companies. The presentation is divided into 7 parts that will discuss: 1) introducing the concepts of dialogue and deliberation, 2) the dialogue and deliberation program, 3) the steps of the process, 4) when it can be used, 5) guiding principles, and 6) conditions for success. It also describes a game where attendees role-play discussing going to the beach vs. countryside for holidays to demonstrate dialogue vs. debate approaches.
The document discusses team building and the stages of team development. It explains that teams work best when members are committed to common goals, have defined roles and responsibilities, effective communication and decision-making, and good personal relationships. The four stages of team building are forming, storming, norming, and performing. Forming involves defining roles and trust building. Storming involves dealing with conflicts as tasks become more difficult. Norming involves accepting roles and ground rules. Performing involves cooperation, problem solving, and attachment to the team.
How Teams Work Making Team Decisions Through Consensus Mike Cardus
Team Decision Making.
Managing & working on teams the procedures being used must be known, shared and understood.
What are often seen as ‘personality conflicts’ are usually just people with unknown work procedures.
The document discusses strategies for integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership. It focuses on applying insights from neuroscience, specifically how the brain responds to factors like status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness, and fairness. Some key strategies proposed are providing clarity of expectations to increase certainty, allowing flexibility and creativity to increase autonomy, fostering collaboration and shared experiences to increase relatedness, having transparent processes to increase fairness, and creating an environment where people feel supported rather than threatened by change.
The document discusses frameworks for designing high-performance organizational processes related to communication, decision-making, and teamwork. It covers topics such as effective communication media matching complexity levels, types of organizational decisions, rational models of decision-making, and participative and group decision-making techniques.
how to conduct effective meetings by Sani GandhiSunny Gandhi
This document provides guidance on how to conduct effective meetings. It discusses determining if a meeting is necessary, preparing an agenda in advance, managing the meeting, following up with action items and minutes. Tips are provided for ensuring appropriate attendees, facilitating participation, addressing different personality types, taking and distributing minutes. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of preparation, active management, and follow up for meetings to be productive.
Group dynamics and_conflict_management_for_student_advisorsderekwd
The workshop is designed to help student organization advisors effectively manage group dynamics and conflicts. Participants will learn about common group development stages and strategies for maintaining healthy dynamics. They will also cover approaches for dealing with inevitable conflicts, including communication skills, interest-based negotiation, and consensus building. The session will provide opportunities to apply these concepts through reflection on participants' experiences and a scenario discussion. Additional resources on meetings and conflict resolution are also made available.
How to do more work in less time using innovation design thinking and worksho...Agile Austria Conference
The ability to collaborate in a valuable way is built on a few key levels 1. Shared language and terminology 2. Shared practices and exercises 3. Shared easy to navigate methodologies and recipes The interactive workshop will go through these points and show while practicing the power of these levels. The benefit of the participants will be that they will learn in a very short time how to apply all of this in order to help their teams do more work in less time independent of their type of products they are building or industry they are working in.
This document provides guidance on effective meeting facilitation. It discusses establishing clear desired outcomes, creating an agenda, setting ground rules, conducting the meeting through opening, content and closing sections, and following up after the meeting through publishing minutes and ensuring progress on action items. The goal is to have meetings that are essential, focused, established, collaborative, time-phased, initiative-minded and valuable.
This document outlines objectives and content for a lesson on group decision making. The objectives include differentiating between individual and group decision making, explaining the group decision making process, discussing effective group leaders, and listing advantages and disadvantages of group decisions. The content outline covers defining groups and decisions, comparing individual and group processes, group formation stages, characteristics of effective groups and leaders, and approaches to group decisions like consensus, negotiation and voting. It also addresses conditions that can foster groupthink and how to avoid it.
Retrospective with multiple teams or with a large audienceAbhilash Chandran
Retrospectives are one of the most integral components of any agile methodology. This helps the team in continuous improvement.
Retrospective with a single team or small group is simple. It is a different ball game altogether when this has to be scaled up to a large audience or multiple teams.
Next slide talks about the format used for many such large retrospectives
Retrospective with multiple teams or with a large audience
LeadershipArlington2015final
1. Leadership Arlington Class of
2015
January 8, 2015
Presented by:
Diane Kresh, Director of libraries
Arlington County Government
dkresh@arlingtonva.us
The Art of Facilitation
in words and pictures
“I really believe there are things nobody would
see if I didn't photograph them.” -- Diane Arbus
2. Overview of the Training
Facilitation and the Facilitator
Elements of Effective Meetings
Process Design of Meetings
Sampling of Facilitation Tools
Documenting the Meeting and Next Steps
Questions??? Answers???
7. Skills of a Facilitator
Meeting Management Skills
Determine group expectations and outcomes
Handle meeting logistics, agenda creation
Establish ground rules
Manage time and process
Group Development Skills
Be aware of group dynamics
Accommodate group culture and norms
Become familiar with group’s history
“Arlington Way”
8. Skills of a Facilitator
Process Skills
Provide tools for inclusion and discussion
Manage conflict
Helps to create a “safe” environment
Problem-Solving Skills (not always)
Analyze group problems
Provide problem-solving tools
Develop a clear problem statement and get buy-in
9. Skills of a Facilitator
“Soft Skills”
Effective listening
Unobtrusive manner
Skill in asking good questions
Skill in timing intervention(s)
Openness and candor
Tolerance of ambiguity
10.
11.
12.
13. Getting started -- Introduction Techniques
Examples of Ice Breakers:
Standard introduction of each participant
Ask each person an interesting question
Arrange them in pairs and ask each pair to interview
each other and introduce each other
Arrange in groups of 4 and ask them to find all the
commonalities among all group members
Large Group Warm-Ups:
1)Find everyone with shoes like yours and stand
together; Now find out one more thing that you have
in common.
2)Find everyone who lives in the same state (including
DC) as you do and stand together;
3)Find everyone who has a similar job and stand
together.
14. Characteristics of an Effective Meeting
Engaging – opportunities to participate
effectively; everyone feels valued & safe
Useful content – information that needed to be
shared
Purposeful – defined outcomes;
value for time spent; decision(s)
made
15. Design of Meetings: Differentiating between
Content and Process
CONTENT - What PROCESS - How
Tasks
Subject for discussion
Problems to be solved
Decisions to be made
Agenda items
Goals and desired
outcomes
Methods
How relationships will be
maintained
Tools to be used
Rules or norms
Group dynamics
Level of engagement
Climate for the discussion
How to achieve end result
16. Meeting Design:
The Starting Point
1) PURPOSE: What is the purpose of the
meeting/process?
2) OUTCOMES/GOALS: What is/are the desired
outcome(s)? E.g., new ideas, consensus or
agreement, strategic plan, process design, etc. How
will the client define success?
3) ROLES: Identify who will have roles in the meeting
and define what those roles are
4) AGENDA: Create an agenda using the best tools
matched to desired outcome
17. Other Design Factors
Stakeholders – who are they? What do we know
about their perspectives and positions?
Meeting Location/Logistics
Promotion/Outreach and Press
Traditional vs. social media
Website and other notices
Meeting Format
Level of participation desired –
Meeting time – constraints and opportunities
Defined roles – chair, facilitator, etc.
18. Meeting Agenda Elements
OPENING
Purpose and Stated Outcomes
Agenda review
Ground rules/outline of process/parking lot
Defining roles
Decision-making
TASK – content/substance
CLOSING
Review agreements/decisions
Review parking lot and address outstanding item
Define next steps/future action
19. Sample Ground Rules
Refrain from any personal attributions
Use of respectful language and behavior
Consideration of other’s perspectives
Willingness to listen attentively
One person speaking at a time
Permit side conversations only on breaks
Begin and end on time
Agree to consistent attendance and other
representatives
Debate issue and positions, not individuals
20. Rules of the Road
Multiple Routes: We have diverse group with differing perspectives, so
consensus is not our goal today
No Road Rage: Respect different points of view and try to minimize
conflicts
Consider Taking a New Route: we will challenge some of your
assumptions and previous approaches
Traffic Calming: slow down, one speaker at a time, raise hands, and
be patient
Look Both Ways and Listen: Before you enter the discussion, carefully
consider your points and do not forget to listen to the flow of the
discussion
Traffic Flow: Try to respond directly to the topic at hand or let us know
if you would like to raise a new point
Parking Lot: keep track of ideas and topics that we can discuss later or
in a different venue
Hands Free: Smart Phones on vibrate only
Travel Log: Reports from small group discussions will generally
synthesize all ideas and perspectives, but will not attribute statements to
individuals
21. Tools Organized by Process Step
Generating Ideas Evaluating Ideas Deciding
Brainstorming
- Idea writing
Consolidating/Narrowing
- Affinity group
Voting
- Majority or Super
Defining/Analyzing
Issues
-Mind mapping
-Fishbone diagram
-Picture it
-SWOT analysis
-Gallery walk
-Design Thinking
Listing in Priority Order
-Multi-voting with dots
-Pick 3 and Drop 3
-Nominal Group Technique
-Paired comparisons
Consensus
-Levels of consensus
-Opposition needs to
convince others
-Thumbs up
Visioning
-Wish, want, wonder
-Defining the vision
-Graphic representation
of the vision/constraints
-World Café
Evaluating Options
-Force Field analysis
-Pro/Con sheet
-Other ranking schemes
Sense of the Group
- Thumbs up, down,
across
- Other non-verbal cues
22. Process Tools for Facilitation
Idea Writing
Form several small groups of 3 – 6 people
Present a triggering question to the group
Silent generation of ideas in writing by each person
Exchange of written sheets among group members
with opportunity to comment/add
Group discussion to clarify key ideas or concerns
Presentation of a report verbally from each group
which summarizes ideas generated by the entire
work group
23. Exercise 1: Using idea writing, to create a policy on
presenting Performing Arts in Arlington County
24. Other Facilitation Tools
SWOT Assessment – Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and
Threats
Visioning with World Café
Design Thinking
Mindmapping
Fishbone Diagramming
27. DRIVING FORCES RESTRAINING FORCES
Ex
Ex
Ex
Ex
EX
EX
EX
EX
Exercise 2: The County Manager has recommended that the
Artisphere be closed, despite three years of intense effort by
dedicated County staff and Artisphere’s growing reputation for artistic
excellence and creativity. Continued operation of Artisphere would
require ongoing tax support, in contradiction to the original promise
the County made that Artisphere would not require additional general
fund revenue. What impact will the closing of Artisphere have on
the growing art scene in Arlington?
28. OPTIONS ROBERT MARY JAMES
1. Assign new office
spaces by seniority
1 3 1
2. Assign spaces by
teams
3 2 2
3. Assign by
hierarchy/status
2 1 3
NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
RANKING: 3 – highest score; 1 – lowest score
29.
30. Consensus and Other Voting
Options for Groups
Consensus
Super Majority – decide on % needed
No Individual Veto – Must persuade another person to join
your view in order to “block”
Majority by Interest Group – require that each interest group
achieve a majority (e.g., enviro. reps, neighborhood members,
business leaders, etc.)
Recommendations Offered by Level of Consensus –
discussion of issues where no consensus is achieved
33. Choices for Organizing Information
List
Cluster
Visual Map
Diagram
Grid or Chart
Poster
34. Managing the Record (Flipchart)
Decide whether to scribe exactly or to synthesize (&
then check in with speaker to ensure that it is correct)
Use verbs and make phrases
complete/understandable
Talk and write at the same time – maintain a good
pace
Move around and act alive; use your energy to
energize and control behaviors of others
Write so that everyone can see the words (size,
penmanship, color of markers)
Post chart paper around the room as a reference tool
Allow others to help with this role (empowering)
35.
36. Handling Difficult Participants
Establish and enforce ground rules
When problems surface, address them
Move closer to the source and engage that
person
Give the “troublesome” person a role to play
Change the meeting format to alleviate the
negative situation
37. Techniques for Handling Conflict
Return to the Operating Norms: Reaffirm the group’s
agreement to abide by the norms
Interrupt the Dialogue when Emotions Dominate:
Intervene with to ask for a reflection on where the group is, or to offer
a strategy on how to redirect, or to suggest a break in the agenda
One-on-one Clearing: Take a break and ask individuals to
approach others privately to discuss behaviors or issues. The
facilitator can assist. Once discussions have occurred, reconvene the
entire group and report out if necessary.
Re-energizing the Group: After a break, invite participants to
share their ideas on how to get more fully engaged. Brainstorming –
no judgments! Map out the suggestions and ask for consensus on how
to proceed or as the facilitator, you make the decision on next steps.
38. Techniques to Energize Groups
One-on-one Clearing: (Use when only a few are stuck) Take a
break and ask individuals to approach others privately to discuss
behaviors or issues. Ask the facilitator to assist if needed. Once
discussions have occurred, reconvene the entire group and report out
if necessary.
Group Clearing: Reflect on the purpose or vision of the group.
Invite participants to express what is getting in their way to full
engagement.
Clearing Yourself: Take a short break to refocus and strategize
on how to modify the process design. Or perhaps to check your
emotions.
Re-energizing the Group: After a break, invite participants to
share their ideas on how to get more fully engaged. Brainstorming –
no judgments! Map out the suggestions and ask for consensus on how
to proceed or as the facilitator, you make the decision on next steps.
39.
40. Ensuring a Safe Environment
Neutrality of the Facilitator
Ground Rules or Operating Norms
Balance – all views are shared and respected and
conflict is managed
Facilitation Process – tools and techniques
41. Creating an Environment to Make the
Dialogue Safe
Create an accepted set of norms that everyone can
agree to use
Be clear about the purpose of the dialogue and the
spirit of collaboration
Share “air time” so that everyone has the
opportunity to be heard
Permit individuals to speak only from their own
perspective
Monitor individual’s vocal tone and body language
in order to maintain the spirit of collaboration
Address conflicts – interpersonal, topical and values
42. Written/Online Resources
Alliance for Innovation – transform.gov
Great Meetings! Great Results! – Dee Kelsey and
Pamela Plumb
The PRIMES: How Any Group Can Solve Any
Problem – Chris McGoff
43. “Don’t think about making art,
just get it done. Let everyone
else decide if it’s good or bad,
whether they love it or hate
it. While they are deciding,
make even more art.”
Andy Warhol