Lakefront development at kanelav lake

Lakefront development at Kanelav lake 2018
ENGINEERING COLLAGE TUWA Page 1

Gujarat Technological University
Ahmedabad
In fulfillment for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Engineering In
Civil Engineering
Engineering Collage Tuwa.
LAKEFRONT DEVELOPMEMENT AT KANELAV LAKE
A project report
Submitted by:
Sr no. Name of the students Enrollment No.
1 Shah Harshil J. 150553106014
2 Shah Neel R. 120550106010
3 Chattani Punit A. 140550106017
4 Jivani Mayur H. 150553106005
5 Rami Aishwari V. 150553106013
Guided By:
Rutu Doshi.
(Assistant Professor )

CERTIFICATE
Date:
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “LAKEFRONT
DEVELOPMENT AT KANELAV LAKE” has been carried out by fulfillment of
the degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Civil engineering (8 th Semester) of Gujarat
Technological University, Ahmedabad during the academic year 2017-18.
2 Shah Neel R. 120550106010
Guided By : Ms. Rutu Doshi
Ms.Rutu Doshi Head Of Department
Assistant Professor Civil Engineering Department

LIST OF TABLE
Table No. Table Description Page No.
1 Land use in revised Godhra development plan,1988 17
2 Area of Lake 23
3 Core cutter calculation 29
4 Material estimate of retaining wall 58
5 Estimate of cutting & filling 60
6 Estimate of retaining wall 61

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Figure Description Page No.
1 Autocad plan map 12
2 Satellite map 15
3 Google map 16
4 Master plan of Godhra 18
5 Lake side land situation 19
6 Road condition 20
7 Rotary club 20
8 Picnic Point entry 21
9 Drinking water facility 21
10 Bad condition of garden 22
11 Unnecessary plants 22
12 Bad condition of equipments 23
13 Methodology 24
14 Ideation canvas 25
15 Product development canvas 26
16 Core cutter 28
17 BMC canvas 77

TABLE OF CONTENT
List of Tables 3
List of Figures 4
Acknowledgement 7
Abstract 8
CHAPTER-1:INTRODUCTION:
1.1 Problem summary & Introduction 9
1.2 Aims & objectives 10
1.3 Problem Definition 10
1.4 Literature Review 10
1.5 Plan of work 12
1.6 Materials & Tools 13
CHAPTER-2:STUDY AREA:
2.1 Introduction of study area 15
2.2 History 16
CHAPTER-3:DESIGN & METHODOLOGY:
3.1 Data Analysis 17
3.2 Observation matrix 19
3.3 Methodology 24
3.4 Implementation strategy 25
CHAPTER-4:IMPLEMENTATION:
4.1 Test & results 27
4.2 Design of counterfort retaining wall 30
CHAPTER-5:SUMMARY 62
CHAPTER-6:ADVANTAGES 63
CHAPTER-7:SCOPE OF FUTURE WORK: 64

CHAPTER-8:CONCLUSION 65
REFERENCES 66
APPENDIX:
 PPR 66
 BMC Report & Model 77
 PDE 81
 PLAGIARISM 86

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, I would like to thank God Almighty for giving me the strength, knowledge,
ability and opportunity to undertake this research study and to persevere and complete it
satisfactorily. Without his blessings, this achievement would not have been possible.
For the work that is completed so far, I want to thank my elders, friends and faculties to support and
allow me to work upon my interest area and at the interested place. Their support, motivation and
help at each stage boosted me to give my best.
I am extremely blessed to get the guidance of Prof. Rutu Doshi, who always helped me and
supported me in the entire task, irrespective of time. When I was stuck with the work, she gave her
sufficient time and made me understand the problem in simple manner. I am gratified to get the
support, suggestions and motivation from her who always told me to believe in myself and keep
doing.
I am also thankful to Head Prof. Rutu Doshi whose suggestions to work in collaborative work under
organization helped a lot. She is a guardian to me who took care of my studies though how much
stressful her duty at department is.
I would like to thank my parents for allowing me to realize my own potential. All the support they
have provided me over the years was the greatest gift anyone has ever given me. Your prayer for me
was sustained me thus far.
Finally, I thank my God, my Father, for letting me through all the difficulties.I have experienced
your guidance day by day.
2 Shah Neel R. 120550106010
Thanking you

ABSTRACT
Lake front property is very expensive because many people want access to the water
for recreation. Lakes and water bodies have always attracted and shaped many urban
development resulting close and integrated water city relation. Our study area is
kanelav lake, Godhra.We have visited these site and we seen the condition of lake is
objectionable. In this town waste water is generally disposed in lake. The strategies
included creating large pedestrian zones along lake edge, developing on outer road by
strengthening existing road network, creating approximately 2 km of access streets as
well as new access point of lake front enhancing recreational potential by improving
public facilities and encouraging overall development within the precinct.

CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROBLEM SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION:
From the ages the water has been the major source of settlement,lakes are one such from
which allow main two grow.Lakes,there watersheds,and the communities the benefit from them,fase
and array of challenges created mainly by increasing human population and challenges and land
use.Most threats,such as nutrient pollution and deformation come from within the watershed.An
increasing number of threats also affects lakes from outside the watershed,such as invasive
species,climate change and atmospheric deposited toxic substance.Since threats to lake health come
from both within and outside the watershed,local,state,national &international interventions may be
necessary,depend on the unic situation of each and every lake.
A lake is an area of variable size filled with water, localized in a basin, that is surrounded by
land, apart from any river or other outlet that serves to feed or drain the lake. Lakes lie on land and
are not part of the ocean, and therefore are distinct from lagoons, and are also larger and deeper
than ponds, though there are no official or scientific definitions. Lakes can be contrasted
with rivers or streams, which are usually flowing. Most lakes are fed and drained by rivers and
streams.
Natural lakes are generally found in mountainous areas, rift zones, and areas with
ongoing glaciations. Other lakes are found in endothecia basins or along the courses of mature rivers.
In some parts of the world there are many lakes because of chaotic drainage patterns left over from
the last Ice Age. All lakes are temporary over geologic time scales, as they will slowly fill in with
sediments or spill out of the basin containing them.
Many lakes are artificial and are constructed for industrial or agricultural use, for hydro-
electric power generation or domestic water supply, or for aesthetic or recreational purposes or even
for other activities.
Waterfronts are settlements, civilizations or commercial developments that come up along
water bodies like rivers, coastal regions or lakes, acting as lifelines for development of cities.
The economic and historical significance of many a city speaks of the glorious waters
flowing through it. The waterfronts have the potential to become the cultural and heritage
hubs of these cities that lie on the bank of the rivers and attract people from the city and
also tourists to spend time. Thus, waterfronts have emerged as the lively urban core of cities.
There are different types of waterfronts like Riverfront, Lakefront and Seafront based on the
source of water in the city. The creation of waterfront is considered as a better commercial idea for
transforming an otherwise underutilized area into a booming centre of tourism, culture, leisure and
business.

1.2. AIM & OBJECTIVES:
 AIMS:
Rehabilitation and resettlement of riverbed dwellers and activities; creation of parks and
public spaces; provision of socio-cultural amenities for the city.
 OBJECTIVES:
o Identification of towns with available waterfronts.
o Prioritization of towns for waterfront development, based on certain key criteria.
o Selection of a pilot town for implementation of the Project.
o Preliminary project viability analysis for the pilot town.
o Identify options for implementation of the Project with private sector participation.
o Increase ground water table.
1.3.PROBLEM DEFINITION:
In Godhra, doesn’t have any places for entertainment and recreational facilities for local public
and outside visitors. In Godhra town there is a one place Kanelav lake which contain some natural
scenery and attracting place, but in existing condition is not good, so we want to develop the lake
and their surrounding area and provide for some basic amenities for people.
 PROBLEM SPECIFICATION:
The increasing pace of urbanization and industrialization has left many towns/ cities with
minimum avenues for recreation and open green spaces. A developed waterfront trail
would provide residents access to new recreation opportunities and an expanded awareness of the
natural aspects of river life. The waterfront would attract a growing legion of morning walkers and
after-work runners. Added to this, public access sites connected by linear greenways will tie
developments together, eliminating barriers, both real and imagined and animate the waterfront with
the light and life of the city.
This form of urban redevelopment can pull the waterfront areas from marginal use and
neglect into the mainstream of public activity and private investment. Cities enjoy
Increased tourism, employment and growth.
1.4. LITERATURE REVIEW:
Bhaskar V. Bhatt, Dipali B. Paneria, Vishwa D. Mehta ”Waterfront Development: A Case
Study Of Sabarmati Riverfront” is said that The water has a potential to make cities as a cultural
and heritage hub. Every tourist that came to the city will pass the river, so by developing the river in
a beautiful way that attracts the more people to visit the place and that increase the revenue.
In this paper, the case study Sabarmati riverfront at Ahmedabad is discussed. The main
concern is to decrease the river pollution, protection from flood and increase the tourism. The
development of the river bank has the area of 202 ha. that cover the area from cantonment area to
vasna barrage.

Waterfront is a place where urban development and water interact,and defined as a unique
and irreplaceable resource where land,water,air,sun,productive plants interface with eachother.
Any development takes place in front of water or water body like river,ocean,lake or canal is term as
waterfront development. In the present scenario,the waterfront development is a global trend.
Nowadays,thousand of schemes for water development and being carried out in all over the world.
Anchal choudhary,Ritu Agarwal “Planned Methodology For Development Of Lakes Of
Bhopal” is said that, The two lakes that border this excellent city are big line of the city are inside
for visitors interest of Bhopal.The top and bottom lakes of Bhopal are placed within popular area and
such advance of developed area and lake water developed are in extended meeting with each other.
This is advance prepared mode for increase of lakes of Bhopal charge into view the look
recreation,tourism,health.To give useful and fake details to all those difficult authority and ruling
making about lake related affairs.It give sketch of commercial contact of these on advancing and
civil condition.For active discipline integrate aim will have to fashion with centre presence and
heavy basic on socio-economic morals,as well as case artistic shift.
From the ages,the water has been the major source of settlements,lakes are one such form
which allow man to grow.Lakes their watersheds,and the communities that benefit from them,face an
array of challenge created mainly by increasing human population and changes in land use.
The capital city of Madhya pradesh,Bhopal,has two man made reservoirs,called upper lake
and lower lake.They are collectively termed as the bhoj wetlands.The upper lake has a catchment
area of 361sq.km. and,at present,water spread of 31sq.km and is a major source of potable water for
people of city of Bhopal.The lower lake have a catchment area of 9.60sq.km and water spread of
1.29sq.km,Lower lake was constructed much later on the down stream of dam of Upper lake.The
lower lake is surrounded from all sides by human settlements.
The city has been a preferred destination for the tourist coming to visit central india due to
lakes,but there is a lack of proper infrastructure and development in this area.So the region of
lagging behind in respect to other regions of country despite the fact that central india has high
potential for tourism.
Lake front development case studies is said that, Kankaria is the biggest lake of the city of
Ahmedabad, Gujarat. With an more boundary of 1.4 miles (2.3 km), it represents the amuse past of
Ahmedabad.Kankaria Lake has more boundary of 1.4 miles (2.3 km). it was developed in 2006-07
by Government of Gujarat at an approximate cost of Rs. 36 Crore.
The lake management care was not controlled to only washing,dusting and other
lake related movement, but it also included lake front development movement. In this project
aptitude like Toy Train, Indoor Stadium, Laser show etc are also developed. The lake front includes
Jogging Track, Aquarium, Zoo, Park called Nagina wadi, Amusement Park called Balwatika. The
new stadium will hold two basket ball courts, a skating rink, a planetarium, elibrary,multipurpose

hall, a gymnasium, aerobics hall, store-rooms, a stage and different rooms for table tennis, snooker
and other indoor games.
The lighting and special effects on the walkway and beautiful food of the restaurants in the
central garden make the lake a valuable place to visit or spend an evening.
The Lake and Lake Front are totally covered and the Ahmedabad Municipal
Corporation has decided to charge Rs. 10 for entry ticket.
1.5.PLAN OF WORK:
Fig no. 1(Auto CAD map)

1.6.MATERIALS & TOOLS:
Counter fort retaining wall:
Retaining wall is providing for to retain earth pressure around lake side. Following
materials are used in wall.
1. Concrete
2. Reinforcement
3. Formwork
Concrete:
The mixture of cement sand aggregate water and admixture is called concrete. Concrete
strength depends upon materials properties.
o Cement:
In cement C3S is responsible for early strength.
C2s is provides ultimate strength. It produces less heat of hydration.
C3a is to prevent flash set, 2 to 3% gypsum is dded at the time of grinding the cement
clinkers. The hydrated C3A do not contribute to the strength of concrete.
C4AF hydrates rapidly.
o Aggregate:
Aggregate are generally cheaper than cement and impart greter volume stability and
durability to concrete. Ti is used primarily for the purpose of providing bulk to the concrete.
Fine aggregate: The size of aggregate 4.75 mm and smaller is called fine aggregate.
Coarse aggregate: the size of aggregate bigger than 4.75 mm is called coarse aggregate.
Nominal size is 12.5 mm.
o Water:
Water is used for mixing and curing shall be clean and free from injurious amount of oil salt
acid, alkalis, sugar, organic materials or other deleterious materials.
Portable water is generally considered satisfactory for mixing concrete.
Reinforcement:
Reinforcement has good tensile property. It gives structure good strength.
Formwork: Formworks are used for to give proper shape to structure also hold concrete in
proper way.

TOOLS:
 Round point shovel
This is helpful for when you have plants to move, digging and starting a footing.
 Square blade shovel
Good for putting in aggregates like gravel or sand and grading the area.
 Rake
Helpful to level out the base rock.
 Tamper
Tamping down areas.
 Level
Determine if the work area and retaining wall rows are level.
 Hammers
It may be helpful to have a mallet and a 5-pound maul to drive stakes into the ground.
 Pick
You might not need this, depending on your type of soil. Picks are useful to loosen hard and
rocky soil.
 Caulking gun and adhesive
These optional items will be useful if you want to glue finishing caps or add steps.

CHAPTER-2: STUDY AREA AND METHODOLOGY:
2.1 STUDY AREA:
Our study area is godhra.It is situated in panchmahal district.We study about the development
of lake in godhra.The godhra city does not have any place for travelling and point of attraction where
people come together for enjoy and entertainment.We provide basic amenities like walk path,picnic
place,boating,food court,fun parks,fountain,garden,toy train,etc.
Water comes from panam dam and rain water.The water is supply naturally from panam dam
to kanelav lake.We are trying to develop area of kanelav lake.
Kanelav lake, Godhra is a perfect destination for a great time with your dear ones. Enjoy the
attractions of this popular tourist spot. With so much to lure your senses and offer you recreation at
its best, get drenched in the spirit of adventure that you get to explore at kanelav lake, Godhra. Enjoy
together all the points of popular interests and bring back several memorable moments. kanelav lake,
Godhra is not just the place for sightseeing, but it also enables you to steal a self-indulgent moment
for yourself as well
-- Read more: https://www.ixigo.com/kanelav-lake-godhra-india-ne-1403216.
LOCATION:KANELAV LAKE,GODHRA,PANCHMAHAL.
SITE AREA:LAKE AREA,LAND AREA,AROUND LAKE SIDE.
(FIG NO-2)

(FIG NO-3)
(Source:Use by GPS System)
2.2 HISTORY:
Godhra refers to “GOV”-a cow Dhara-‘’DHARTI”means godhra is a land of cows.Godhra has
been an important centre during the Mughal and the Maratha periods.in 1418,mohhemed begda
chose godhra as the headquater of one of is provinces and retained is former importance even after
champaner become the capital in 1484.the history of panchmahal and godhra is associated with
champaner,a capital city in the seventh century in the regime of vanraj.
The two beautiful ponds Kanelav Talav and Ram Sagar Talav are the main attractions of
the city Located in a scenic surrounding and having a check-dam, Kanelav Talav serves as
a haven for relaxation. which was established by Parmar king named Dhudhul Mandalik in A.D.
1415. Five hundred years ago, the respectable Saint Shrimad Vallabhacharya in his morning ritual
speech gave the example of his dream city. He explained how the city which was seen in dream by
her daughter was handed over by a Muslim resident to a Hindu family.

CHAPTER-3:DESIGN:
3.1 DATA ANALYSIS:
-Land use in revised Godhra develpoment plan,1988
Table no:1
Sr.no. Land use Area(In Ha) Area(%)
1. Gamtal 45 2
2. Residence 659 34
3. Indusrial 147 7
4. Commercial 68 3
5. For public 90 5
6. Recreation 13 1
7. Railway or other
service
76 4
8. Grave yard 25 1
9. T P Scheme No-1-2 93 2
10. River,lake 96 5
11. Road(present) 48 2
12. Road(proposed) 19 1
13. Agriculture,open
area
653 33
Total 2033 100.00
Source:Godhra
Development plan,1988

Figure No-4:Master plan of godhra(Source Town and country planning office Godhra)
There is a difference between,proposed and existing master plan.It is essential that
accurate data is acquired for study and analysis;it has to be through a reliable source.For
this purpose the field study,as been done through field visits and ma[s of godhra city

prepared by the NATIONAL REMOTE SENSING AGENCY HYDRABAD has been used
for analysis,for areas,which were not approachable.
The analysis is divided into three main parts. The first section of report introduces the causes of
land pollution and its effects in city areas. It explains the land importance also land use. The second
section is a water treatment and uses at Kanelav Lake side of the most. This study entailed an
examination of the land use, development of an urbanest fabric analysis in which total vegetation,
paved. The last section is to understand about lake around land and about history also present
condition of Kanelav Lake.
3.2 OBSERVATION MATRIX:
Fig-5: Lake side land situation

Fig-6: Road condition
Fig-7:Rotary club

Fig-8:Picnic point entry
Fig-9: Drinking water facility

f fi
Fig-10 : bad condition of garden
Fig-11:Unnecessary plants

Fig-12:Bad Condition Of Equipment
We are going to site visit & we observe the present condition at near lake side. Here not
provided any facilities like road, food facilities or sitting arrangement for public or visitors
and unobjectionable plants are grow & totally structures is damaged. We take some
photographs to know the condition of lake &we interest the public to know the details of lake
side area. At this lake, land & water pollution are created.
After this survey we are going to gram-panchayat for collecting data of kanelav lake area &
map or some data with the help of net surfing.
1 guntha = 1089 sq.ft.
1 ha = 2.471 acre.
Table no-2
(Area of lake)
Sr no. Survey no Hecture Are Per Acre-guntha
Jafarbad 307 23 01 36 56-35
Vavdi bujarg 99 47 08 54 116-14
We collect the map & studied in detailed. After these study , we know the kanelav lake is divided in
two gram-panchayat. For survey no -307 is jafrabad gram-panchyat & another is survey no-99 is
vavdi-bujarg gram-panchyat. After studied these map we know how many land is developed around
the kanelav lake.

We are decided to provide,
o boundary wall.
o Chain fencing
o Garden and landscaping
o Water-water water treatment.
o Road develop
o Solar lights
o Recreational structure( like boating stalls etc)
3.3. METHODOLOGY:
Fig.13 (methodology)
This research is organized around four principal functions of the waterfront: The Natural
Waterfront - comprising of beaches, wetlands, sensitive ecosystems and the water itself; The
Public Waterfront - including parks, street ends, vistas and waterways; The Working Waterfront

- where water dependent, maritime and industrial uses are dispersed; and The Redeveloped
Waterfront, in which related land uses have recently changed due to various reasons. The
waterfront functions and major issues are discussed in the context review and the planning strategies
and proposals includes short- and long-term strategies intended to guide land use change, planning,
coordination, and public investment.
3.4.IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY:
 Understanding the concept of lakefront development.
 Identifying Research problem/Key issues of study area.
 Literature study on waterfront development in Urban planning,Urban design and architecture.
 Identify opportunities for waterfront development in Godhra.
 Prepare documentation by survey of secondary sources(data collection) and conducting a
primary field work.
 Identifying and apply a framework in Godhra waterfront sites to present options for
environmentally sustainable waterfront development planning.
The study recognizes that the list of sites identified in the course of this research cannot be
exhaustive; more sites need to be identified for improved waterside public spaces: at the water's
edge, with modest improvements, points of access for nearby residents and other users could be
provided; and other waterfront sites need to be identified, where public access would be a mandatory
component for new development.
o IDEATION CANVAS :
Fig.14-Ideation canvas

o PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CANVAS:
Fig.15-Product development canvas

CHAPTER-4:IMPLEMENTATION:
4.1.TEST AND THEIR RESULTS:
o CORE CUTTER TEST:
Cylindrical core cutters of 130mm long and 100mm diameter are used for testing the in-situ
compaction of cohesive and clay soils placed as fill. By using core cutter method, bulk density of soil can be
quickly calculated and by determining the moisture content of the soil the dry density of the fill can be
calculated and hence the voids percentage. A high percentage of voids indicates poor compaction of soil.
A cylindrical core cutter is a seamless steel tube. For determination of the dry density of the soil, the
cutter is pressed into the soil mass so that it is filled with the soil without disturbing the core contents. The
cutter filled with the soil is lifted up. The mass of the soil in the cutter is determined. The dry density is
obtained as
Where,
M= mass of the wet soil in the cutter
V= internal volume of the cutter
w= water content.
Equipment for Core Cutter Method
 Cylindrical core cutter, 100mm internal diameter and 130mm long
 Steel rammer, mass 9 kg, overall length with the foot and staff about 900mm.
 Steel dolley, 25mm high and 100 mm internal diameter
 Weighing balance, accuracy 1g.
 Palette knife
 Straight edge, steel rule etc

Fig 16. Core Cutter Test
 PROCEDURE
o Determine the internal diameter and height of the core cutter to the nearest 0.25mm
o Determine the mass (M1) of the cutter to the nearest gram.
o Expose a small area of the soil to be tested. Level the surface, about 300mm square in
area.
o Place the dolley over the top of the core cutter and press the core cutter into the soil mass
using the rammer. Stop the pressing when about 15mm of the dolley protrudes above the
soil surface.
o Remove the soil surrounding the core cutter, and take out the core cutter. Soil soil would
project from the lower end of the cutter.
o Remove the dolley. Trim the tip and bottom surface of the core cutter carefully using a
straight edge.
o Weigh the core cutter filled with the soil to the nearest gram (M2).
o Remove the core of the soil from the cutter. Take a representative sample for the water
content determination.
o Determine the water content.

Table 3: Observation and calculations
Sr.
No.
Observations Determination
No.1
Determination
No.2
Determination
No.3
1 Core cutter No. 1 2 3
2 Internal diameter(mm) 100 100 100
3 Internal height(mm) 129.75 129.75 129.75
4 Mass of empty core cutter
(M1)(g)
1130 1130 1130
5 Mass of core cutter with soils
(M2)(g)
3120 3124 3117
6 M=M2 – M1 1990 1994 1987
7 Volume of cutter V(cc) 1019.05 1019.05 1019.05
8 Water content (%) 31.75 30.09 32.87
9 Dry density using formula(g/cc) 17.66 17.99 17.92
Results of Core Cutter Method
Dry density of the soil= 18g/cc.

4.2. Design of counter fort retaining wall:
Ø=30°
Height above G.L.=6.10m
µ=0.60(Assume)
ᵞ=18KN/m³ (As per test result)
S.B.C.=150KN/m²(As per test result)
Fck=25N/mm²
Fy=415 N/mm²

Item Description No L B H Qty
(a) 8mm dia. Steel bars
Assume cover 5cm
8mm dia. Bars are vertical In stem
Bars upto top of wall
L= 7.2 + 0.45(heel) + (2×90) × 0.072
= 7.72-0.05(top cover)-0.10(bottom cover)
= 7.572m
No. of bars = 100-2×0.05/0.54 + 1
= 101 Nos. 101 7.572 0.39 298.26kg
Bars upto 2m below top:
L= 7.572-2 = 5.572m
No. of bars = 1 bar less than above bar
= 101 - 1 = 100 Nos. 100 5.572 0.39 217.31kg
Bars upto 2m height:
L = 5.572 - 2 = 3.572m
No. of bars = 101 + 100 - 1 200 3.572 0.39 272.62kg
Total 794.19kg
(b) Quanty of cement,sand,aggregate for 1:1:2
concrete
Stem= 0.30 + 0.20/2
= 0.25m 1 100 0.45 6.65 299.85
Base slab: 1 100 4.615 0.45 207.67
B = 1.70 + 0.30 + 2.615 = 4.615m Total 506.92m³
Volome of concrete = 506.92m³
Volome of dry concrete is 52%
dry volume of concrete:
=506.92 × 1.52
=973.30m³
1:1:2 = 4
Cement = 1/4 × 973.30
= 243.32m³
= 243.32/0.035
= 69.52 bags
Sand = 1/4 × 973.30
= 243.32m³
Aggregate = 2/4 × 973.30
=486.65m³

Table no-4(Material Estimate of retaining wall)
(b) wt. of 10mm ɸ bars:
on both forces 10 ɸ- 28cm c/c
L = 100 + 2 × 9× 0.010(two hook)
- 2 × 0.05(two cover)
= 100.80m
no. of bars = 7.2-0.05/0.28 + 1
= 26 Nos.
Total bars = 2 × 26 = 52nos.
Top bars in base slab:
Span = 1.710 + 0.3 = 2m
L = 100.08m
Nos. = 4.615 - 0.05/0.25 + 1
= 20 Nos.
Total nos. of 10ɸ bars
= 15 + 20 + 52
= 87 Nos.
Total wt. of 10ɸ bars 87 100.08 0.617 5372.9kg
(c) 25ɸ @ 110 c/c
Span = 1.7 + 0.3 + 2.615
= 4.615m
L = 100.08m
Nos.= 4.615 - 0.05/0.11 + 1
= 43 nos. 43 100.08 3.86 1611.29kg
Formwork
stem 2 100 - 7.2 144
base slab side 2 100 - 0.5 100
base slab end 2 4.615 - 0.5 4.6

Chainage Depth(m) Area mid Area side Total area Mean area Distance Filling Cutting
0 1 3 1 4 5.375 100 - 537.5
100 1.5 4.5 2.25 6.75 5.9 100 - 590
200 1.2 3.6 1.44 5.05 6.845 100 - 684.5
300 1.8 5.4 3.24 8.64 9.32 100 - 932
400 2 6 4 10 8.68 100 - 868
500 1.6 4.8 2.56 7.36 10.16 100 - 101.6
600 2.4 7.2 5.76 12.96 8.48 100 - 848
700 1 3 1 4 5.68 100 - 568
800 1.6 4.8 2.56 7.36 5.68 100 - 568
900 1 3 1 4 5.375 100 - 568
1000 1.5 4.5 2.25 6.75 5.375 75 - 403.125
Passes 0 3 1 4 5.375 85 456.85 -
1100 1.5 4.5 2.25 6.75 5.895 100 589.5 -
1200 1.2 3.6 1.44 5.04 5.315 100 531.5 -
1300 1.3 3.9 1.69 5.59 8.515 100 851.5 -
1400 2.2 6.6 4.84 11.44 10.04 100 1004.4 -
1500 1.8 5.4 3.24 8.64 7.4 100 740 -
1600 1.4 4.2 1.96 6.16 5.08 100 508 -
1700 1 3 1 4 3.436 100 343.6 -
1800 0.696 2.388 0.484 2.872 1.899 100 189.9 -
1900 0.282 0.846 0.0795 0.926 0.695 100 69.5 -
2000 0.115 0.345 0.119 0.464 - 100 - -
Total 5284.37 6668.72
Table no-5(Cutting & Filling estimate)
Length of walk path = 2 km(2000m)
Width = 3m
Size of paver block = 22.5×11.25cm
Rate of block = 12 per block
No. of paver block = Area of path / Area of block
= 2000×3/0.225×0.1125
= 2,38,000/- blocks
Price= 2,38,000×12
= Rs 2,85,6000/-

Table no-6(Estimate of retaining wall)
Item Description Quantity Rate Per Am
1 RCC(1:1:2) 506.92m³ 5500 m³ 2788060
2 Formwork 1544.62kg 100 m² 154462
3 Steel base slab 5372.19kg 46 kg 247120.74
4 Steel in stem 794.19kg 46 kg 36532.74
Total Rs 3226175.4
Add 5% Rs 161308.7
Rs 3387484.2
100m - 3387484.25
1000m - ? (3387484.25)
1m² = 15.6kg
1544.62 = 24096.07kg

CHAPTER-5: SUMMARY:
Lake front property is very expensive because many people want access to the water for
recreation. Lakes and water bodies have always attracted and shaped many urban development
resulting close and integrated water city relation.Our study area is kanelav lake,Godhra.We have
visited these site and we seen the condition of lake is objectionable.In these town waste water is
generally disposed in lake.The strategies included creating large pedestrian zones along lake
edge,developing on outer road by strengthening existing road network,creating approximately 2
km of access streets as well as new access point of lake front enhancing recreational potential by
improving public facilities and encouraging overall development within the precinct.

CHAPTER 6: ADVANTAGES:
 With the development of waterfront there would be creation of jobs in developing the front,
jobs as it gives way to starting up of a host of commercial activities in that region and also
indirect job creation associated with the set of activities.
 Development of tourism in the region – with the development of waterfront the tourism in
the region can be increased by offering a variety of attractions like water sports,
entertainment arenas, parks, shopping areas, etc.
 Water conservation practices - Development of Riverfront projects would ensure a proper
design of projects in conserving river and maintenance of rivers flowing through large cities.
 Beautification of the waterfront with a natural outlook will provide the general public with
an open space for leisure and recreation.
 Providing employment opportunities for nearby people and helping in development of
region.
 Encouraging recreational activities like walking, jogging, biking, sports activities, etc
 Improving quality of life of nearby community by revitalizing the neighborhood.

CHAPTER 7: SCOPE OF FUTURE WORK:
o Garden and landscaping design.
o Providing drinking water facilities and washroom.
o Also designing recreational structure.
o Creating employment facility.
o Renewable sources.

CHAPTER 8:CONCLUSION:
The misuse river can be brought back to the city by utilizing the resources of the river
itself and convert the empty land of riverbed and problem at the centre of the city into people's
attraction, tourist attraction, creation of infrastructural and recreational facilities and transform
the city more livable in terms of environmental improvement and inclusive development.

REFERENCES:
1) Anchal choudhary,Ritu Agarwal ‘ lanned and methodology for de elo ment of la es of
Bho al’ roceedings of Taal 2007:The 12th
Lake conference:1798-1803.
2) Bhas ar ijay umar bhatt,Di ali babubhai aneria,Vishwa D Mehta ‘Waterfront
development: A case study of Sabarmati riverfront June 2012.
3) Master plan of godhra(source town and country planning office godhra).
4) Map collection by GPS system.
5) Pruda-All india institute of local self government(city development plan ,godhra.
 WEBSITES:
(1)http://www.ixigo.com/kanelav- lake-godhra-india-ne-1403216.
(2)www.googlemaps.com
(3)www.wikipedia.org/
(4)www.kankarialakefront.in

APPENDIX

 BMC REPORT AND MODEL:
What is Business Model Canvas?
The Business Model Canvas is a strategic management and lean start up template for
developing new or documenting existing business models. It is a visual chart with elements
describing a firm or product's value proposition, infrastructure, customers and finances.
Segments of Business Model Canvas:-
1) KEY PARTNERS:
 There are three major partners included in our project, namely
1) Government
2) Municipality
3) Gram Panchayat
2) KEY ACTIVITIES:
 Under this, we have to do development which includes the study, design of project
and cost management. The product is delivering to customer.
1) Site Visit
2) Researches
3) Analysis
4) Design
5) Customer feedback
3) VALUE PROPOSITIONS:
 A proposition is promise of value to be delivered and acceptance from
Customers.
 For this purpose we have design the product at the desired location and from which
customers easily get benefits.
 Low food cost

4) CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS:
The most important relationship between customer and production
department. From this we have providing good services and increase product
designs by giving a demo plans.
1) Safety
2) Spend more time
3) Long Life
5) CUSTOMER SEGMENTS:
The customer who are important, include in this section. They are,
1) Smart Cities
2) Local Road
3) Local People
4) Visitors
5) Recreational Facilities
6)KEY RESOURCES:
For achievement of product, the resources which needed arethe following,
1) Urban Development
2) Design
3) Planning
4) Public-Facilities
7) CHANNELS:
We can deliver its value proposition to its targeted customer through Different
channels. Effective channels will distribute a company’s value Proposition in ways that
are fast, efficient and cost effectives. An Organization can reach its clients either
through its own channels, partners Channels or a combination of both

We want to create a channel which are as following as,
1) Gram Panchayat
2) Social Media
3) Youtube
8) COST STRUCTURE:
 The cost include for the production of the product are,
1) Capital cost
2) Designing cost
3) Fixed cost
4) Variable cost
5) Maintenance cost
7) Running cost
9) REVENUE STREAMS:
 The way a company makes income from each customer segment. Several
ways to generate a revenue stream.
 In this section we have discussed that how and from where we will Generate
revenue
1) Advertisement
2) Providing Schemes
3) Economic

BMC CANVAS
Fig no.17

College : ENGINEERING COLLEGE, TUWA, GODHARA
Department : Civil Engineering
Discipline : BE
Semester : Semester 8
Project Name : Lake front development at
godhra city Team ID : 18144
Form 1 – APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT
Applicants :
Sr.
No
Name Nationality Address Mobile No. Email Id
1
Shah Harshilkumar
Jayeshbhai
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
Gujarat Technologycal
University.
8347032568 harshilshah6512@gmail.com
2
Shah Neel
Rasheshkumar
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9909508236 shahneel472@gmail.com
3 Chhatani Punit Asandas Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
8460410090 punitchhatani@gmail.com
4
Jivani Mayurkumar
Hiralal
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9909499330 mayurjivani1996@gmail.com
5
Rami Aishwariben
Vasantbhai
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9624525847 aish281096@gmail.com

Inventors :
Sr.
No
Name Nationality Address Mobile No. Email Id
1
Shah Harshilkumar
Jayeshbhai
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
Gujarat Technological
University.
8347032568 harshilshah6512@gmail.com
2 Shah Neel
Rasheshkumar
Indian Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9909508236 shahneel472@gmail.com
3
Chhatani Punit
Asandas
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
8460410090 punitchhatani@gmail.com
4
Jivani Mayurkumar
Hiralal
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9909499330 mayurjivani1996@gmail.com
5
Rami Aishwariben
Vasantbhai
Indian
Civil Engineering ,
ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, TUWA,
GODHARA ,
University.
9624525847 aish281096@gmail.com

I/We, the applicant(s) hereby declare(s) that:
Following are the attachments with the applications :
Form 2 - PROVISIONAL/COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
1 . Title of the project/invention :
Lake front development at godhra city
2. Preamble to the description :
Provisional
3. Description
a)Field of Project / Invention / Application :
Kanelav lake,Godhra,Panchmahal district,Gujarat state.
b) Prior Art / Background of the Project / Invention :
I have design and estimate the retaining wall,path etc.
c)Summary of the Project / Invention :
Lake front property is very expensive because many people want access to the water for recreation. Lakes
and water bodies have always attracted and shaped many urban development resulting close and integrated
water city relation.Our study area is kanelav lake,Godhra.We have visited these site and we seen the condition
of lake is objectionable.In these town waste water is generally disposed in lake.The strategies included
creating large pedestrian zones along lake edge,developing on outer road by strengthening existing road
network,creating approximately 2 km of access streets as well as new access point of lake front enhancing
recreational potential by improving public facilities and encouraging overall development within the precinct.
d) Objects of Project / Invention :
• Identification of towns with available waterfronts.
• Prioritization of towns for waterfront development, based on certain key criteria.
• Selection of a pilot town for implementation of the Project.
• Preliminary project viability analysis for the pilot town.
• Review of Acts, laws and legislations governing the waterfront development.
• Identify options for implementation of the Project with private sector participation.
• Increase ground water table.
• Decrease some part of water which is waste.

e)Drawings :
f) Description of Project / Invention : (full detail of project) :
g) Examples :
h) Claims (Not required for Provisional Application) / Unique Features of
Project Design of retaining wall and paver blocks.
4. Claims
5. Date and signature
6. Abstract of the project / invention :
Form 3 – STATEMENT AND UNDERTAKING UNDER SECTION 8
Name of the applicant(s) :
I/We, Shah Harshilkumar Jayeshbhai ,Shah Neel Rasheshkumar
,Chhatani
Punit Asandas ,Jivani Mayurkumar Hiralal ,Rami Aishwariben
Vasantbhai
Hereby declare :
Name,Address and
Nationality of the joint
applicant :
(i) that I/We have not made any application for the same/substantially
the same victim invention outside India.

(ii) that the rights in the application(s) has/have been assigned to
Name of the
Date
of
Applicatio
n
Status of
the
Date
of
Date of
Country Application
Number
Applicatio
n
Publicatio
n
Grant
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
To be signed by the applicant or his authorised registered patent agent :
Name of the Natural Person who has signed :
(iii)That I/We undertake that upto the date of grant of the patent by the Controller, I/We would keep him
informed in writing the details regarding corresponding applications for patents filed outside India within
three months from the date of filing of such application.
Dated this 11 day of April 2018 Signature.................
Shah Harshilkumar Jayeshbhai ,
Shah Neel Rasheshkumar ,
Chhatani PunitAsandas ,
Jivani Mayurkumar Hiralal ,
Rami Aishwariben Vasantbhai
To,
The Controller of Patents, The Patent Office,
At Mumbai

PLAGIARISM:

Page | 86
ENGINEERING COLLAGE TUWA.

Lakefront development at kanelav lake

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Lakefront development at kanelav lake

Recently uploaded

Lakefront development at kanelav lake