K.L. Bondar, A.B. Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                  Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                       Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822
 Existence Of Solutions For Nonlinear Difference Equations With
                       Nonlocal Conditions
                           K.L. Bondar 1, A.B. Jadhao 2 and S.T. Patil3
                1
                    P.G. Dept. of Mathematics, N.E.S. Science College, Nanded – 431 605 (MS) India
                                          2
                                            DSM College, Parbhani (MS) INDIA
                                3
                                  D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi, Pune INDIA



Abstract                                                     2. Preliminary Notes and Hypothesis
        Existence of mild solutions of initial                        Let E be a real Banach space and
value problem for nonlinear difference equation              J = {0,1, 2,..., N}, C(J, E) denote the Banach space
with nonlocal conditions is obtained. The proof              of functions y : J→E equipped with the norm
relay on the fixed point theorem for compact
mapping.                                                                    ||y||∞ = sup{||y(t)|| : t  J}
AMS Subject Classification: 39A10; 47A10.
                                                             and B(E) denotes the Banach space of bounded
Keywords:           Nonlocal condition; Mild solution;       linear operators from E into E with norm
Fixed point..
                                                                       || T ||B(E) = sup{|| T (y) || : || y || = 1}.
1. Introduction:
         Due to wide application in many fields              Let us list the following hypothesis:
such as science, economics, neural network,
ecology, the theory of nonlinear difference                  (H1) A : J × E → B(E), (t, v) : → A(t, v) is a
equations has been widely studied since 1970; see,           continuous function with respect to v such that
for example, [1, 3, 15, 16]. At the same time,               for r > 0 there exists r1 > 0 such that
boundary value problems and initial value problems
of difference equations have received much                   ||v|| ≤ r → ||A(t, v)|| B(E) ≤ r1
attentions     from      many      authors;      see
[2,4,7,9,10,13,19].                                                for all t  J and v E.
         In this paper, we consider an initial value
problem for a nonlinear difference equation with             (H2) f : J × E ! E, (t; v) :! f(t;
nonlocal initial conditions. More precisely we
consider the IVP                                             v) is a continuous function with
                                                             respect to v.
     y(t )  A(t , y(t )) y(t )  f (t , y(t )) (1.1)
                                                              (H3) A function g : C (J, E) × E is continuous and
                                                             there exists a constant L > 0 such that
          y (0)  g ( y )  y0                    (1.2)
                                                             || g(y) || ≤ L for each y  E.

where t  J  {0, 1, 2,...,N } , A, f : J × E → E are        (H4) There exists constant K such that
two continuous functions, g : C(J, E)→E, y0  E                    || f (t, u) || ≤ K for all t  J, u E .
and E is a real Banach space with the norm || . ||. The
existence of solutions for IVP (1.1)-(1.2) is obtained       For each u  C(J, E),                  define     a       function
by using the classical fixed point theorem for               Uu : J × J → B(E) such that
compact map due to Smart [18].
          Such problems with classical initial                                               t 1

conditions have been studied by Anichini [5],                           U u (t , s )  I   Au ( w)U u ( w, s ) (2.1)
Anichini and Conti [6], Conti [11], Conti and                                               w s
Iannacci [12], Kartsatos [14], Mario and Pietramala          where I stands for an identity operator on E and
[17].                                                        Au(t) = A(t, u(t)).
         The nonlocal conditions, which are                  From (2.1), one has
generalization of the classical initial conditions was
motivated by physical problems. The pioneering                         U u (t , s)  I , s  t, u  E                    (2.2)
work on nonlocal conditions is due to Byszewski              and
[8].




                                                                                                         1820 | P a g e
K.L. Bondar, A.B. Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                     Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                          Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822
                                                                   ∆ Uy(t, s) = A(t, y(t))Uy(t, s).
              tU u (t , s)  A(t , u (t ))U u (t , s)     (2.3)   Put
                                                                                    t
In the list of hypothesis, assume                                  z (t ) =  U y (t , s ) f ( s  1, y ( s  1)) .
                                                                                  s 1
(H5) M = sup{||Uy(t, s)||B(E) : (t, s)  J × J ,                   Therefore,
y  B(E)}.                                                                    t
Remark 2.1 From (H1), it follows that for                          z (t ) = { tU y (t , s) f (s  1, y(s  1))}  U y (t  1, t  1) f (t , y(t ))
u  C(J, E), Au  C(J, B(E)).                                                s 1

Remark 2.2 Suppose {un} is a sequence in C(J, E)
converging to u*  C(J, E). Then (H1) implies                                             t
Aun → Au* i.e. A(t, un(t)) → A(t, u*(t)) for all t  J.             = A(t , y (t ))  U y (t , s) f ( s  1, y ( s  1))  f (t , y (t )).
                                                                                         s 1
          Now we prove the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1 If (H1) holds then for each u  C(J, E);                 Thus equation (2.5) reduces to
Uu : J × J → B(E) defined by (2.1) is continuous
with respect to u.                                                                y(t) = Uy(t, 0)y0 - Uy(t, 0)g(y) + z(t).
Proof: From (2.1) by putting t = s+1 and using
Uu(s, s) = I, we get                                               Therefore,

Uu(s+1, s) = I + A(s, u(s))Uu(s, s)                                ∆ y(t) = ∆ Uy(t, 0)y0 - ∆ Uy(t, 0)g(y) + ∆ z(t)
           = I +A(s, u(s)).                                               = A(t, y(t))y(t) + f(t, y(t)).
For t = s+2,                                                       This completes the proof.
     Uu(s+2, s) = I+A(s, u(s))Uu(s, s)+                                      A function y(t) given by (2.5) is called mild
                             A(s+1, u(s+1))Uu(s+1, s)              solution of IVP (1.1)-(1.2).
                = (I + A(s, u(s)))(I + A(s+1, u(s+1))).            3. Existence Theorems:
Continuing the process, we obtain                                  In this section we establish the existence of solution
                                                                   of IVP (1.1)-(1.2).
                   t 1
U u (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u ( w)))
                                                                   The following Lemma is crucial in the proof of main
                                                           (2.4)   theorem.
                  w s
                                                                   Lemma 3.1: (18) Let X be a Banach space and let
Now, suppose {un} is a sequence in C(J, E)                         T : X → X be a continuous compact map. If the set
converging to u*  C(J, E). From (2.4), one has                    Ω = {y  X : λy = T(y), for some λ >1}
                    t 1
U un (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u n ( w)))
                                                                   is bounded, then T has a fixed point.
                                                                   Theorem 3.1 : Assume that hypothesises (H1)-(H5)
                   w s
                                                                   are satisfied. Then the problem (1.1)-(1.2) has at
and                                                                least one mild solution on J.
                    t 1
U u* (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u* ( w)))
                                                                   Proof: We transform the problem (1.1)-(1.2) into a
                                                                   fixed point problem. Consider the mapping
                   w s
                                                                   T : C(J, E) → C(J, E) defined by
The conclusion follows from (H1) and Remark 2.2.

Theorem 2.1: A function y  C(J, E) given by                       (Ty)(t ) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y) 
                                                                                                 t                                 .     (3. 1)
y(t) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y)                                                      U (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1))
                                                                                                s 1
                                                                                                       y

                            t                              (2.5)
                           U (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1))
                                                                   It is clear that the fixed points of T are mild
                                  y                                solutions of (1.1)-(1.2).
                           s 1
                                                                            We shall show that T is a continuous
is a solution of IVP (1.1)-(1.2).                                  compact mapping. The continuity of T follows from
Proof: It follows from (2.2) and (2.5) that                        Lemma 2.1 and hypothesises (H2), (H3). Now we
                                                                   prove that T maps bounded sets into relatively
            y(0) = Uy(0, 0)y0-Uy(0, 0)g(y)                         compact sets. i.e. T is a compact mapping. Let
                  i.e. y(0) + g(y) = y0.
                                                                   Br = {y  C(J, E) : ||y|| ≤ r}.
From (2.3), we have
                                                                   Then for each t  J and y  Br, we have
∆ Uy(t, 0) = A(t, y(t))Uy(t, 0)

and


                                                                                                                        1821 | P a g e
K.L. Bondar, A.B. Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                     Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                          Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822
(Ty)(t ) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y) 
                                                  t                                 .
                                                  U y (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1))
                                                 s 1
By (H3)-(H5) we have
                                                                                        References:
|| Ty || ||U y (t , 0) || || y0 ||  || U y (t , 0) |||| g ( y) ||                     1.    R.P. Agarwal, Difference Equations and
                                             t                                                 Inequalities, Markel Dekker, New York ,
                                         || U (t, s) ||||f (s  1, y(s  1)) ||
                                          s 1
                                                        y
                                                                                         2.
                                                                                               (1992).
                                                                                               R.P. Agarwal and F.H. Wong, Existence
         ≤ M (||y0|| + L + KN).                                                                of positive solutions for higher order
                                                                                               difference equations, Appl. Math. Lett.,
Therefore T is bounded on Br. Now for t1, t2  J                                               10(5) (1997), 67-74.
and t1 < t2, using (2.3) we obtain                                                       3.    R.P. Agarwal and P.J.Y. Wong,
                                                                                               Advanced topic in difference equations,
Uy(t2, s) - Uy(t1, s) = Uy(t2, s)-Uy(t2-1, s) + Uy(t2-1, s)-                                   Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht, (1997).
                           …….+Uy(t1+1, s)-Uy(t1, s)                                     4.    D.R. Anderson, Discrete third-order three-
                                      t 2 1                                                   point right-focal boundary value problem,
                                    =  A( w, y( w))U y ( w, s) (3.2)                          Comp. Math. Appl., 45 (2003), 861-871.
                                      wt1                                               5.    G. Anichini, Nonlinear problems for
By (H1), (H3) - (H5) and (3.2) we have                                                         system of differential equations, Nonlinear
                                                                                               Anal., 1 (1977), 691-699.
||Ty(t2)-Ty(t1)|| ≤ ||Uy(t2, 0) - Uy(t1, 0)||(||y0||+L)+                                 6.    G. Anichini and G. Konti, Boundary
                   t1
                                                                                               value problems with nonlinear boundary

                  || U (t , s)  U (t , s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) || 
                   s 1
                              y 2            y 1                                         7.
                                                                                               conditions, Nonlinearity, 1 (1988), 1-10.
                                                                                               F.M. Atici and A. Cabada, Existence and
                                                                                               Uniqueness results for discrete second
                    t2

                   || U (t , s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) ||
                                                                                               order periodic boundary value problems,
                              y 2                                                              Compt. Math. Appl., 45 (2003), 1417-
                 s  t 1 1
                                                                                               1427.
               ≤r1M(||y0||+L)(t2-t1)+r1MKN(t2-t1)+MK(t2-t1)                              8.    L. Byszewski, Existence and uniqueness of
                                                                                               semilinear evolution of nonlocal Cauchy
                = M[r1(||y0||+L)+K(r1N+1)](t2-t1)                                              problem,        Zeszyty Nauk, Politech.
                                                                                               Rzaszowskiej Math. Fiz., 18 (1993), 109-
          ≤ K1(t2-t1),                                                                         112.
for some K1. Hence T(Br) is an equicontinuous                                            9.    P.U. Chopade, K.L. Bondar, S.T. Patil
family of functions. Therefore by the Ascoli-Arzela                                            and V.C. Borkar, Existence of extremal
theorem, T(Br) is relatively compact.                                                          solutions     for     difference   equation,
Now we prove that the set                                                                      International      Journal     of   Applied
Ω = {y  C(J, E) : λy = T(y), for some λ >1}                                                   Mathematics, 1(1) (2010), 1-9.
is bounded. Let y  Ω , then λy = T(y) for some λ >                                      10.   P.U. Chopade, K.L. Bondar, Existence of
1. Therefore,                                                                                  solutions to boundary value problem of
y(t ) = -1 U y (t , 0) y0 - -1 U y (t , 0) g ( y)                                           functional         difference      equation,
                                                                                               International Journal of Mathematical
                                                  t
                                         -1 U y (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1))
                                                                                               Analysis, 5(13) (2011), 643-650.
                                                                                         11.   R. Konti, Recent trends in the theory of
                                                 s 1
                                                                                               boundary value problems for ordinary
By (H3)-(H5), for each t  J, we have                                                          differential equations, Bull.Un. Math. Ital.
|| y(t ) ||  || U y (t , 0) || (|| y0 ||  L)                                                22 (1967), 135-178.
                                         t                                               12.   G. Konti and Iannacci, Nonzero solutions
                                        || U (t, s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) ||
                                        s 1
                                                        y
                                                                                               of nonlinear systems of differential
                                                                                               equations via fixed point theorems for
        ≤ M(||y0|| + L + KN).                                                                  multivalued map, Nonlinear Anal.,          8
Therefore, ||y|| = sup{||y(t)|| : t  J} ≤ K2 for some K2                                      (1982), 415-421.
> 0. This shows that Ω is bounded. Set X = C(J, E).                                      13.   J. Henderson, Positive solutions for
As a consequence of Lemma 3.1, we deduce that T                                                nonlinear         difference      equations,
has a fixed point which is a mild solution of (1.1)-                                           Aequationes Math., 62 (2001), 249-261.
(1.2).                                                                                   14.   A. Kartsatos, Nonzero solutions to
                                                                                               boundary value problems for nonlinear

                                                                                                                         1822 | P a g e
K.L. Bondar, A.B. Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and
                Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                     Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822
      systems, Pacific J. math., 53(1974), 425-
      433.
15.   W.G. Kelley and A.C. Peterson,
      Difference equations, Academic Press,
      Boston, (1991).
16.   V.Lakshmikantham and D. Trigiante,
      Theory of Difference equations, Numerical
      Methods and Applications,        Academic
      Press, New York, (1988).
17.   G. Marino and P. Pietramala, Boundary
      value problems with nonlinear boundary
      conditions in Banach spaces, Comment.
      Math. Univ. Carolina, 31 (1990), 711-721.
18.   D.R. Smart, Fixed point theorems,
      Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
      UK, (1974).
19.   D.B. Wong, Multiple solutions of periodic
      boundary value problems for first order
      difference equations, Bull. Austral. Math.
      Soc., 78 (2008), 1-11.




                                                                             1823 | P a g e

Kt2418201822

  • 1.
    K.L. Bondar, A.B.Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822 Existence Of Solutions For Nonlinear Difference Equations With Nonlocal Conditions K.L. Bondar 1, A.B. Jadhao 2 and S.T. Patil3 1 P.G. Dept. of Mathematics, N.E.S. Science College, Nanded – 431 605 (MS) India 2 DSM College, Parbhani (MS) INDIA 3 D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi, Pune INDIA Abstract 2. Preliminary Notes and Hypothesis Existence of mild solutions of initial Let E be a real Banach space and value problem for nonlinear difference equation J = {0,1, 2,..., N}, C(J, E) denote the Banach space with nonlocal conditions is obtained. The proof of functions y : J→E equipped with the norm relay on the fixed point theorem for compact mapping. ||y||∞ = sup{||y(t)|| : t  J} AMS Subject Classification: 39A10; 47A10. and B(E) denotes the Banach space of bounded Keywords: Nonlocal condition; Mild solution; linear operators from E into E with norm Fixed point.. || T ||B(E) = sup{|| T (y) || : || y || = 1}. 1. Introduction: Due to wide application in many fields Let us list the following hypothesis: such as science, economics, neural network, ecology, the theory of nonlinear difference (H1) A : J × E → B(E), (t, v) : → A(t, v) is a equations has been widely studied since 1970; see, continuous function with respect to v such that for example, [1, 3, 15, 16]. At the same time, for r > 0 there exists r1 > 0 such that boundary value problems and initial value problems of difference equations have received much ||v|| ≤ r → ||A(t, v)|| B(E) ≤ r1 attentions from many authors; see [2,4,7,9,10,13,19]. for all t  J and v E. In this paper, we consider an initial value problem for a nonlinear difference equation with (H2) f : J × E ! E, (t; v) :! f(t; nonlocal initial conditions. More precisely we consider the IVP v) is a continuous function with respect to v. y(t )  A(t , y(t )) y(t )  f (t , y(t )) (1.1) (H3) A function g : C (J, E) × E is continuous and there exists a constant L > 0 such that y (0)  g ( y )  y0 (1.2) || g(y) || ≤ L for each y  E. where t  J  {0, 1, 2,...,N } , A, f : J × E → E are (H4) There exists constant K such that two continuous functions, g : C(J, E)→E, y0  E || f (t, u) || ≤ K for all t  J, u E . and E is a real Banach space with the norm || . ||. The existence of solutions for IVP (1.1)-(1.2) is obtained For each u  C(J, E), define a function by using the classical fixed point theorem for Uu : J × J → B(E) such that compact map due to Smart [18]. Such problems with classical initial t 1 conditions have been studied by Anichini [5], U u (t , s )  I   Au ( w)U u ( w, s ) (2.1) Anichini and Conti [6], Conti [11], Conti and w s Iannacci [12], Kartsatos [14], Mario and Pietramala where I stands for an identity operator on E and [17]. Au(t) = A(t, u(t)). The nonlocal conditions, which are From (2.1), one has generalization of the classical initial conditions was motivated by physical problems. The pioneering U u (t , s)  I , s  t, u  E (2.2) work on nonlocal conditions is due to Byszewski and [8]. 1820 | P a g e
  • 2.
    K.L. Bondar, A.B.Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822 ∆ Uy(t, s) = A(t, y(t))Uy(t, s).  tU u (t , s)  A(t , u (t ))U u (t , s) (2.3) Put t In the list of hypothesis, assume z (t ) =  U y (t , s ) f ( s  1, y ( s  1)) . s 1 (H5) M = sup{||Uy(t, s)||B(E) : (t, s)  J × J , Therefore, y  B(E)}. t Remark 2.1 From (H1), it follows that for z (t ) = { tU y (t , s) f (s  1, y(s  1))}  U y (t  1, t  1) f (t , y(t )) u  C(J, E), Au  C(J, B(E)). s 1 Remark 2.2 Suppose {un} is a sequence in C(J, E) converging to u*  C(J, E). Then (H1) implies t Aun → Au* i.e. A(t, un(t)) → A(t, u*(t)) for all t  J. = A(t , y (t ))  U y (t , s) f ( s  1, y ( s  1))  f (t , y (t )). s 1 Now we prove the following lemma. Lemma 2.1 If (H1) holds then for each u  C(J, E); Thus equation (2.5) reduces to Uu : J × J → B(E) defined by (2.1) is continuous with respect to u. y(t) = Uy(t, 0)y0 - Uy(t, 0)g(y) + z(t). Proof: From (2.1) by putting t = s+1 and using Uu(s, s) = I, we get Therefore, Uu(s+1, s) = I + A(s, u(s))Uu(s, s) ∆ y(t) = ∆ Uy(t, 0)y0 - ∆ Uy(t, 0)g(y) + ∆ z(t) = I +A(s, u(s)). = A(t, y(t))y(t) + f(t, y(t)). For t = s+2, This completes the proof. Uu(s+2, s) = I+A(s, u(s))Uu(s, s)+ A function y(t) given by (2.5) is called mild A(s+1, u(s+1))Uu(s+1, s) solution of IVP (1.1)-(1.2). = (I + A(s, u(s)))(I + A(s+1, u(s+1))). 3. Existence Theorems: Continuing the process, we obtain In this section we establish the existence of solution of IVP (1.1)-(1.2). t 1 U u (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u ( w))) The following Lemma is crucial in the proof of main (2.4) theorem. w s Lemma 3.1: (18) Let X be a Banach space and let Now, suppose {un} is a sequence in C(J, E) T : X → X be a continuous compact map. If the set converging to u*  C(J, E). From (2.4), one has Ω = {y  X : λy = T(y), for some λ >1} t 1 U un (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u n ( w))) is bounded, then T has a fixed point. Theorem 3.1 : Assume that hypothesises (H1)-(H5) w s are satisfied. Then the problem (1.1)-(1.2) has at and least one mild solution on J. t 1 U u* (t , s )   ( I  A( w, u* ( w))) Proof: We transform the problem (1.1)-(1.2) into a fixed point problem. Consider the mapping w s T : C(J, E) → C(J, E) defined by The conclusion follows from (H1) and Remark 2.2. Theorem 2.1: A function y  C(J, E) given by (Ty)(t ) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y)  t . (3. 1) y(t) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y)   U (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1)) s 1 y t (2.5) U (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1)) It is clear that the fixed points of T are mild y solutions of (1.1)-(1.2). s 1 We shall show that T is a continuous is a solution of IVP (1.1)-(1.2). compact mapping. The continuity of T follows from Proof: It follows from (2.2) and (2.5) that Lemma 2.1 and hypothesises (H2), (H3). Now we prove that T maps bounded sets into relatively y(0) = Uy(0, 0)y0-Uy(0, 0)g(y) compact sets. i.e. T is a compact mapping. Let i.e. y(0) + g(y) = y0. Br = {y  C(J, E) : ||y|| ≤ r}. From (2.3), we have Then for each t  J and y  Br, we have ∆ Uy(t, 0) = A(t, y(t))Uy(t, 0) and 1821 | P a g e
  • 3.
    K.L. Bondar, A.B.Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822 (Ty)(t ) = U y (t , 0) y0 - U y (t , 0) g ( y)  t .  U y (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1)) s 1 By (H3)-(H5) we have References: || Ty || ||U y (t , 0) || || y0 ||  || U y (t , 0) |||| g ( y) ||  1. R.P. Agarwal, Difference Equations and t Inequalities, Markel Dekker, New York , || U (t, s) ||||f (s  1, y(s  1)) || s 1 y 2. (1992). R.P. Agarwal and F.H. Wong, Existence ≤ M (||y0|| + L + KN). of positive solutions for higher order difference equations, Appl. Math. Lett., Therefore T is bounded on Br. Now for t1, t2  J 10(5) (1997), 67-74. and t1 < t2, using (2.3) we obtain 3. R.P. Agarwal and P.J.Y. Wong, Advanced topic in difference equations, Uy(t2, s) - Uy(t1, s) = Uy(t2, s)-Uy(t2-1, s) + Uy(t2-1, s)- Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht, (1997). …….+Uy(t1+1, s)-Uy(t1, s) 4. D.R. Anderson, Discrete third-order three- t 2 1 point right-focal boundary value problem, =  A( w, y( w))U y ( w, s) (3.2) Comp. Math. Appl., 45 (2003), 861-871. wt1 5. G. Anichini, Nonlinear problems for By (H1), (H3) - (H5) and (3.2) we have system of differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 1 (1977), 691-699. ||Ty(t2)-Ty(t1)|| ≤ ||Uy(t2, 0) - Uy(t1, 0)||(||y0||+L)+ 6. G. Anichini and G. Konti, Boundary t1 value problems with nonlinear boundary || U (t , s)  U (t , s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) ||  s 1 y 2 y 1 7. conditions, Nonlinearity, 1 (1988), 1-10. F.M. Atici and A. Cabada, Existence and Uniqueness results for discrete second t2 || U (t , s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) || order periodic boundary value problems, y 2 Compt. Math. Appl., 45 (2003), 1417- s  t 1 1 1427. ≤r1M(||y0||+L)(t2-t1)+r1MKN(t2-t1)+MK(t2-t1) 8. L. Byszewski, Existence and uniqueness of semilinear evolution of nonlocal Cauchy = M[r1(||y0||+L)+K(r1N+1)](t2-t1) problem, Zeszyty Nauk, Politech. Rzaszowskiej Math. Fiz., 18 (1993), 109- ≤ K1(t2-t1), 112. for some K1. Hence T(Br) is an equicontinuous 9. P.U. Chopade, K.L. Bondar, S.T. Patil family of functions. Therefore by the Ascoli-Arzela and V.C. Borkar, Existence of extremal theorem, T(Br) is relatively compact. solutions for difference equation, Now we prove that the set International Journal of Applied Ω = {y  C(J, E) : λy = T(y), for some λ >1} Mathematics, 1(1) (2010), 1-9. is bounded. Let y  Ω , then λy = T(y) for some λ > 10. P.U. Chopade, K.L. Bondar, Existence of 1. Therefore, solutions to boundary value problem of y(t ) = -1 U y (t , 0) y0 - -1 U y (t , 0) g ( y)  functional difference equation, International Journal of Mathematical t -1 U y (t, s) f (s  1, y(s  1)) Analysis, 5(13) (2011), 643-650. 11. R. Konti, Recent trends in the theory of s 1 boundary value problems for ordinary By (H3)-(H5), for each t  J, we have differential equations, Bull.Un. Math. Ital. || y(t ) ||  || U y (t , 0) || (|| y0 ||  L)  22 (1967), 135-178. t 12. G. Konti and Iannacci, Nonzero solutions || U (t, s) |||| f (s  1, y(s  1)) || s 1 y of nonlinear systems of differential equations via fixed point theorems for ≤ M(||y0|| + L + KN). multivalued map, Nonlinear Anal., 8 Therefore, ||y|| = sup{||y(t)|| : t  J} ≤ K2 for some K2 (1982), 415-421. > 0. This shows that Ω is bounded. Set X = C(J, E). 13. J. Henderson, Positive solutions for As a consequence of Lemma 3.1, we deduce that T nonlinear difference equations, has a fixed point which is a mild solution of (1.1)- Aequationes Math., 62 (2001), 249-261. (1.2). 14. A. Kartsatos, Nonzero solutions to boundary value problems for nonlinear 1822 | P a g e
  • 4.
    K.L. Bondar, A.B.Jadhao, S.T. Patil / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1820-1822 systems, Pacific J. math., 53(1974), 425- 433. 15. W.G. Kelley and A.C. Peterson, Difference equations, Academic Press, Boston, (1991). 16. V.Lakshmikantham and D. Trigiante, Theory of Difference equations, Numerical Methods and Applications, Academic Press, New York, (1988). 17. G. Marino and P. Pietramala, Boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions in Banach spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolina, 31 (1990), 711-721. 18. D.R. Smart, Fixed point theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1974). 19. D.B. Wong, Multiple solutions of periodic boundary value problems for first order difference equations, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 78 (2008), 1-11. 1823 | P a g e