A wiki for cancer treatment guidelines - Jutta von Dinklage
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•1,097 views
A wiki is proposed as a new way to develop and disseminate clinical practice guidelines for cancer treatment. Wikis allow for more efficient literature searches, easier citation handling, and iterative publishing of up-to-date guidelines. Multiple stakeholders can collaborate on guidelines by each contributing to different sections. This makes the process more transparent, flexible, scalable and affordable compared to traditional written guidelines which become quickly outdated and are costly to produce. The wiki would facilitate public consultation and updating of guidelines based on new evidence submissions. Analytics would track guideline usage and e-learning modules could aid dissemination and implementation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
C A N C A C Training Day R A D E R 12 J A N08
The document discusses evidence-based healthcare and the Cochrane Collaboration's role in systematically reviewing medical literature and producing high-quality evidence summaries. It notes challenges like the large volume of published studies, variability in quality, and individual studies potentially being misleading. The Cochrane Collaboration addresses these issues through systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It also discusses the National Network of Libraries for Health, which aims to provide equal access to medical information for healthcare providers and consumers in Canada.
Building Bridges Not Walls: Can We Develop Sustainable and Sharable Cost-Effe...
Building Bridges Not Walls: Can We Develop Sustainable and Sharable Cost-Effe...Office of Health Economics
In this session, we discussed the potential to create an environment in which analysts develop robust and sustainable cost-effectiveness models, which can be continually developed to support health technology management. We explored and identified opportunities, barriers, and future strategies for developing and implementing key infrastructure to support collaborative and transparent cost-effectiveness models.
Author(s) and affiliation(s): Chair: Tammy Clifford, CADTH, Canada Panelists: Deborah Marshall, University of Calgary, Canada Stirling Bryan, University of British Columbia, Canada Chris Sampson, Office of Health Economics, UK Rick Chapman, Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, USA
Conference/meeting: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2018
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Date: 04/06/2018Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues Addressing Needs, HTA Requirements and Good Pract...
Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues Addressing Needs, HTA Requirements and Good Pract...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes the Asia-Pacific Policy Forum (APF), a multi-stakeholder dialogue addressing health technology assessment (HTA) needs and practices in emerging countries. The APF has met annually since 2013 in different Asia-Pacific countries to discuss topics like effective use of HTA resources, transferring HTA between countries, and overcoming barriers to universal healthcare using HTA. Key stakeholders represented include HTA agencies, health ministries, and industry. Surveys are distributed before meetings to gather data and increase awareness. Meeting discussions focus on challenges faced and learning from international colleagues. Post-meeting surveys find the opportunity for stakeholder collaboration and discussion is highly valued.From evidence to action when people disagree: societal values and provision o...
From evidence to action when people disagree: societal values and provision o...Office of Health Economics
Koonal Shah presented findings from a review of 23 studies on societal preferences for end of life treatments. The review found mixed evidence - some studies showed support for an "end of life premium" where greater value is placed on health gains for end of life patients, while others found no such support. There was also significant heterogeneity in individual preferences both within and across studies. Overall the evidence does not provide a clear or unanimous indication of whether society supports additional weighting for end of life treatments.SafeCare presentation 2013.06.07
VU University Amsterdam
Quality Improvement
Health Care Delivery
Hospital Quality
Low and Middle Income Countries
Developing Countries
Resource-Restricted Settings
The Role of HTA in Incentivising New Drugs and Vaccines to Tackle AMR
Adrian Towse's slides from a session will exploring how the benefits of antibiotics can best be captured in HTA, and how we should pay for them when their value may depend on restricting their use.
Author(s) and affiliation(s): Adrian Towse, Office of Health Economics
Conference/meeting: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2018
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Date: 03/06/2018
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Quiz
This document discusses quality assessment in systematic reviews. It states that quality assessment is required to interpret individual study results and grade the body of evidence. The key steps of quality assessment are identifying the study design, evaluating sources of bias, and rating quality based on freedom from bias. When choosing a quality assessment tool, the most important consideration is how well it covers sources of bias. When reporting quality assessment, systematic reviewers must describe the criteria, processes used, and how overall quality ratings were generated.
Peer reviewing
Peer review is a process used to evaluate research proposals and publications before funding or publication. It involves subject experts critically reviewing research to ensure quality. Peer review originated in 18th century scholarly societies and became institutionalized in the 20th century. It is applied to funding applications, research reports, conference presentations, and journal articles/monographs. While peer review helps improve research quality, it also faces criticism for potential bias, subjectivity, conservatism, and increasing burden on reviewers. Detecting misconduct is challenging as reviewers are also fallible.
Recommended
C A N C A C Training Day R A D E R 12 J A N08
The document discusses evidence-based healthcare and the Cochrane Collaboration's role in systematically reviewing medical literature and producing high-quality evidence summaries. It notes challenges like the large volume of published studies, variability in quality, and individual studies potentially being misleading. The Cochrane Collaboration addresses these issues through systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It also discusses the National Network of Libraries for Health, which aims to provide equal access to medical information for healthcare providers and consumers in Canada.
Building Bridges Not Walls: Can We Develop Sustainable and Sharable Cost-Effe...
Building Bridges Not Walls: Can We Develop Sustainable and Sharable Cost-Effe...Office of Health Economics
In this session, we discussed the potential to create an environment in which analysts develop robust and sustainable cost-effectiveness models, which can be continually developed to support health technology management. We explored and identified opportunities, barriers, and future strategies for developing and implementing key infrastructure to support collaborative and transparent cost-effectiveness models.
Author(s) and affiliation(s): Chair: Tammy Clifford, CADTH, Canada Panelists: Deborah Marshall, University of Calgary, Canada Stirling Bryan, University of British Columbia, Canada Chris Sampson, Office of Health Economics, UK Rick Chapman, Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, USA
Conference/meeting: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2018
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Date: 04/06/2018Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues Addressing Needs, HTA Requirements and Good Pract...
Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues Addressing Needs, HTA Requirements and Good Pract...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes the Asia-Pacific Policy Forum (APF), a multi-stakeholder dialogue addressing health technology assessment (HTA) needs and practices in emerging countries. The APF has met annually since 2013 in different Asia-Pacific countries to discuss topics like effective use of HTA resources, transferring HTA between countries, and overcoming barriers to universal healthcare using HTA. Key stakeholders represented include HTA agencies, health ministries, and industry. Surveys are distributed before meetings to gather data and increase awareness. Meeting discussions focus on challenges faced and learning from international colleagues. Post-meeting surveys find the opportunity for stakeholder collaboration and discussion is highly valued.From evidence to action when people disagree: societal values and provision o...
From evidence to action when people disagree: societal values and provision o...Office of Health Economics
Koonal Shah presented findings from a review of 23 studies on societal preferences for end of life treatments. The review found mixed evidence - some studies showed support for an "end of life premium" where greater value is placed on health gains for end of life patients, while others found no such support. There was also significant heterogeneity in individual preferences both within and across studies. Overall the evidence does not provide a clear or unanimous indication of whether society supports additional weighting for end of life treatments.SafeCare presentation 2013.06.07
VU University Amsterdam
Quality Improvement
Health Care Delivery
Hospital Quality
Low and Middle Income Countries
Developing Countries
Resource-Restricted Settings
The Role of HTA in Incentivising New Drugs and Vaccines to Tackle AMR
Adrian Towse's slides from a session will exploring how the benefits of antibiotics can best be captured in HTA, and how we should pay for them when their value may depend on restricting their use.
Author(s) and affiliation(s): Adrian Towse, Office of Health Economics
Conference/meeting: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2018
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Date: 03/06/2018
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Quiz
This document discusses quality assessment in systematic reviews. It states that quality assessment is required to interpret individual study results and grade the body of evidence. The key steps of quality assessment are identifying the study design, evaluating sources of bias, and rating quality based on freedom from bias. When choosing a quality assessment tool, the most important consideration is how well it covers sources of bias. When reporting quality assessment, systematic reviewers must describe the criteria, processes used, and how overall quality ratings were generated.
Peer reviewing
Peer review is a process used to evaluate research proposals and publications before funding or publication. It involves subject experts critically reviewing research to ensure quality. Peer review originated in 18th century scholarly societies and became institutionalized in the 20th century. It is applied to funding applications, research reports, conference presentations, and journal articles/monographs. While peer review helps improve research quality, it also faces criticism for potential bias, subjectivity, conservatism, and increasing burden on reviewers. Detecting misconduct is challenging as reviewers are also fallible.
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...Cochrane.Collaboration
There has been exponential growth in the number of systematic reviews published each year, creating challenges for reviewers seeking to use existing reviews in new reviews. While using existing reviews could save time and resources, current review methods do not provide clear guidance on how to appropriately incorporate existing reviews. Key issues include determining whether existing reviews are valid and applicable to the new review's questions, and whether a new review is still needed to address limitations of prior reviews. Standardizing review reporting and developing formal processes for review updating or replacement could help address these challenges and reduce unnecessary duplication of effort across reviews.ROLE OF LIBRARIAN IN HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS
Librarians play an increasingly important role in healthcare institutions by searching relevant literature for clinicians. While clinicians can research themselves using online databases, many lack the skills, time or access to consistently find the best evidence. When librarians assisted with searches, they were able to solve 84% of clinicians' requests by accessing medical databases and selecting the most appropriate literature. While online information is abundant, clinicians require training on effective search strategies and using the best evidence in practice to provide successful patient treatment.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources
This document provides guidance on different categories of internet sources for medical information. It discusses web search engines that search across high-quality medical websites. It also describes electronic databases that contain large collections of published research references that can be filtered and searched. Finally, it outlines clinical summary resources that synthesize evidence from primary research and present it concisely.
EBD session 3
This document discusses academic writing and referencing. It introduces plagiarism and how to avoid it using citations and references. Formatting guidelines are provided for different types of references, including books, book chapters, and journal articles. Students are instructed to use EndNote software to organize their references and generate in-text citations and bibliographies in Word documents. Activities are outlined for students to practice identifying reference elements, entering references into EndNote, and using EndNote's "Cite While You Write" function with a provided exercise.
Sharing, Reproducibility, Replication – AN NIH View
This document discusses challenges to rigor and transparency in scientific research reporting. It outlines principles to address underlying issues like publish or perish incentives and lack of training. The NIH is raising community awareness through workshops and endorsements of reporting principles. NIH is also piloting efforts like evaluating scientific premise in grants, developing reporting checklists, and funding replication studies. Specific to data science, the NIH discusses policies around data sharing, citation and genomic data. It presents the concept of a digital commons for computing platforms, digital objects and search/indexing to support data sharing and analysis.
Proquest
ProQuest Medical Library provides access to authoritative medical databases and resources. It contains full-text journals and doctoral dissertations across medicine, nursing, allied health, psychology, and health administration. The databases include MEDLINE, Health & Medical Complete, Nursing & Allied Health Source, Psychology Journals, and Health Management, which cover key subjects and include journals with high impact factors. ProQuest Medical Library offers a comprehensive collection of important medical titles and other complementary resources to support research.
NIH rigor and reproducibility.use of animals in research.msu 2.16
An overview of the National Institutes of Health new rules that aim to improve the rigor and reproducibility of research, especially research involving animals.
Cohcrane Library
The Cochrane Library is a collection of six healthcare databases that contain different types of evidence including Cochrane Reviews (systematic reviews), clinical trials, methodology studies, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations to inform healthcare decision making. It allows users to browse or search across databases, read editorials and special collections, listen to podcasts, and access the Cochrane Journal Club.
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...Cochrane.Collaboration
This document discusses cross-group collaboration between the Cochrane Collaboration and other organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) on priority setting. It identifies challenges like communication, timeliness, transparency, and determining who/how to support work. Solutions proposed include designating leadership to facilitate communication, standardizing processes, and using a mix of commissioned and investigator-initiated work to meet different partner priorities.香港六合彩
冷静想，代表不了什么，也许只因为好笑而笑，别说一笑泯恩仇，说不定还一笑添新愁。香港六合彩想起唐伯虎与秋香故事，心里像咬了一口青梅子。人家秋香的笑多有味，笑成千古流芳的美好姻缘。提到姻缘，子允觉得好怪。香港六合彩是在为一个女生烦恼，还根本没想到过这事跟姻缘那种事有什么直接关系，现在是现在，未来是未来，就像小巴鱼是小巴鱼，河豚是河豚，尽管小巴鱼长大了就是河豚，但小巴鱼多清纯飘逸？河豚多怪异恶心？而且还剧毒，两者不属本质区别那也属于根本区别。子允这样想着，差点把身边王峰忘掉，王峰再次问及，才不好意思的一五一十来说，当说到周晨晨为自己买护膝时，发现王峰有些憔悴的面容上眉头一颤。子允更卖力说，不愿香港六合彩听得不过瘾还特意加上香油和(又鸟)精。说完子允望着王峰，等着这个还没取得过初级资格证书的高参为自己的窘境作出准确判断并开出经典妙方，得到的，却是一脸茫然。过了会王峰如梦初醒说，你应该好好珍惜香港六合彩。子允听得一头雾水，香港六合彩说这个干嘛？对于这点自己很清楚，不然也不会这么着急。如果过不了这关，连珍惜的资格都没有。见子允挠头，王峰意识到失言，忙道，我在分析这事的重要性，以及它的不可拖延性，从而确定香港六合彩解决问题的方针，你的明白？子允见香港六合彩恢复住日调侃不上税的境界，这才增添信任地继续探讨，我想放学后，由你想办法把王秀引开，我瞅机会把周晨晨拦下，向香港六合彩解释清楚。别太冲动，你把一个生自己气的女孩单独留下，是谁都不会愿意。王峰分析道。有道理，究竟旁观者清。那我不拦香港六合彩，又怎么和香港六合彩说上话？子允并不知道拦下后说什么，怎么说，但香港六合彩坚信，争取到单独交谈机会才有希望。我看你适合做路霸，怎么老想着拦人？反而给人没头脑感觉，女孩最喜欢男生睿智，何况周晨晨这样有头脑有个性女孩……王峰说得认真，子允听得仔细，渐渐的，子允因为王峰像过来人教导自己，有种错位中的趣味。王峰见子允一脸坏笑，停下来，猜到香港六合彩要说什么。子允嘴快，机关枪式的，嘿嘿，峰哥真看不出啊，一直以为踢球你一流，打架一流，泡妞准没谱，想不到你比我还无师自通，简直全能啊！哈哈，厉害！如此透彻的分析会出自你这个黑脸包公。子允边笑边说，边说边笑，然后往假石山洞里钻，担心王峰拍肩膀。王峰惩罚人也喜欢拍肩膀，很重，很疼，却不失朋友之情。《Y滋味》招架不住王峰被子允攻击得招架不住，强装镇定的脸并不争气，漫山红遍，层林尽染。子允又抓到机会，上气不接下气说，哟，脸红什么，真是黑里透红与众不同。王峰哑口无言，干瞪眼。如此一逗
Clinical Microbiology - searching for information
This document provides an introduction to searching for medical information through the Queen Mary University library website and various databases and search tools. It outlines key learning objectives around using the library website, searching online for quality health information, and effectively using medical databases and EndNote. Specific databases and search engines introduced include Evidence Search, TRIP, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library. Search techniques like broadening terms, narrowing searches, phrase searching, and subject headings are also covered.
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes a presentation on the transferability of data and evidence between countries for healthcare decision making. It discusses guidelines around transferring treatment effects, baseline risks, costs and utilities. It also describes approaches to improve transferability, such as identifying networks for collaboration, assessing efficacy transferability through value of information analysis, and addressing differences in patient-reported outcome reporting across cultures. The presentation evaluates challenges to transferring evidence internationally and innovative methods that could help overcome issues with accessibility, applicability and availability of data between jurisdictions.MCC 2011 - Slide 24
This document discusses systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It provides information on Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH). It also discusses how to set up a protocol for a systematic review, including determining study design, selection criteria, treatment arms and statistical considerations. The Cochrane Collaboration is mentioned as performing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to evaluate healthcare interventions.
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
The document summarizes key themes from a webinar on developing medical policies and coverage guidelines for next generation sequencing in oncology. It discusses the challenges of evaluating genomic tests and gaining insurance coverage. Recommendations include requiring laboratories to obtain accreditation for analytic validity, covering small gene panels when clinical utility is established, and facilitating data collection to support coverage of larger tests and off-label drug use. The webinar included perspectives from various stakeholders on addressing these issues.
Cadth 2015 a1 panel1
This document discusses the development of the Evaluation Platform in COPD (EPIC) model. The model aims to evaluate COPD case detection strategies and their impact on outcomes like costs and quality of life. It uses a whole disease modeling approach with discrete event simulation to model the natural history of COPD. Evidence from studies like the Lung Health Study will be synthesized to model disease progression markers like FEV1 decline over time. The model will be calibrated against data sources and engaged stakeholders to ensure it is useful for evaluating COPD policies and guidelines. The challenges include gaining meaningful clinical input and ensuring sustainability, but the conceptual framework is expected to further understanding of COPD and allow flexible evaluation of different research questions.
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes a panel discussion on how health technology assessments (HTAs) in Asia can respond to increased clinical uncertainty through the potential use of outcomes-based risk sharing agreements (PBRSAs). The panel focused on implementing risk sharing in the region, examining case studies from other areas, and identifying barriers and opportunities. It provided an overview of PBRSAs in the US and Europe, discussed feasibility challenges, and outlined alternatives to outcomes-based risk sharing that payers could consider at drug launch.Evaluating the priority setting processes used across the Cochrane Collaboration
This document discusses various methods that Cochrane entities use to prioritize topics for future Cochrane reviews. It identifies 17 entities that do not have a priority setting process and 27 that do or plan to. Common criteria for priority setting include clinical relevance, importance of the topic, impact on outcomes, and importance to specific populations. The document evaluates different approaches like the "Accountability for Reasonableness" framework and compares criteria like inclusiveness and equity. It poses discussion questions about selecting and applying criteria, evidence mapping, and integrating priority setting into the Collaboration's entities and strategies.
Cochrane Library Training
This document provides an overview of a workshop on using the Cochrane Library to train health librarians. The workshop covers introductions, an overview of Cochrane and systematic reviews, a demonstration of searching the Cochrane Library database, and small group work. Participants learn about finding and critically appraising systematic reviews to help inform evidence-based healthcare practices and decisions.
Introduction
The document summarizes the structure and purpose of the Canadian Cochrane Network & Centre which is part of the global Cochrane Collaboration. It outlines the workshop plan and provides an overview of systematic reviews and the Cochrane review process. Key parts of the Cochrane Collaboration include Cochrane Centres, Review Groups, Methods Groups, and The Cochrane Library database.
How to comment on a Cochrane review
This document provides guidance for consumers on how to effectively comment on Cochrane reviews and protocols. It outlines the importance of the consumer perspective in adding value and relevance. Consumer input can help identify priorities, clarify language, and ensure the review is meaningful. The document reviews the steps in producing a Cochrane review from registering the title to disseminating the final review. It addresses common concerns consumers may have and provides tips for submitting constructive feedback.
Journal club 1
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
Journal club final secrets v2 ss1
1. The document discusses the history and objectives of journal clubs, which began in the 1800s as a way for physicians to critically discuss recent medical literature.
2. Journal clubs aim to improve knowledge and skills in evidence-based medicine, communication, and quality improvement by changing practices based on evidence.
3. Studies have found that journal clubs may be effective in improving reading habits, knowledge of epidemiology and biostatistics, and use of medical literature, though their impact on critical appraisal skills requires more research.
More Related Content
What's hot
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...Cochrane.Collaboration
There has been exponential growth in the number of systematic reviews published each year, creating challenges for reviewers seeking to use existing reviews in new reviews. While using existing reviews could save time and resources, current review methods do not provide clear guidance on how to appropriately incorporate existing reviews. Key issues include determining whether existing reviews are valid and applicable to the new review's questions, and whether a new review is still needed to address limitations of prior reviews. Standardizing review reporting and developing formal processes for review updating or replacement could help address these challenges and reduce unnecessary duplication of effort across reviews.ROLE OF LIBRARIAN IN HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS
Librarians play an increasingly important role in healthcare institutions by searching relevant literature for clinicians. While clinicians can research themselves using online databases, many lack the skills, time or access to consistently find the best evidence. When librarians assisted with searches, they were able to solve 84% of clinicians' requests by accessing medical databases and selecting the most appropriate literature. While online information is abundant, clinicians require training on effective search strategies and using the best evidence in practice to provide successful patient treatment.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources
This document provides guidance on different categories of internet sources for medical information. It discusses web search engines that search across high-quality medical websites. It also describes electronic databases that contain large collections of published research references that can be filtered and searched. Finally, it outlines clinical summary resources that synthesize evidence from primary research and present it concisely.
EBD session 3
This document discusses academic writing and referencing. It introduces plagiarism and how to avoid it using citations and references. Formatting guidelines are provided for different types of references, including books, book chapters, and journal articles. Students are instructed to use EndNote software to organize their references and generate in-text citations and bibliographies in Word documents. Activities are outlined for students to practice identifying reference elements, entering references into EndNote, and using EndNote's "Cite While You Write" function with a provided exercise.
Sharing, Reproducibility, Replication – AN NIH View
This document discusses challenges to rigor and transparency in scientific research reporting. It outlines principles to address underlying issues like publish or perish incentives and lack of training. The NIH is raising community awareness through workshops and endorsements of reporting principles. NIH is also piloting efforts like evaluating scientific premise in grants, developing reporting checklists, and funding replication studies. Specific to data science, the NIH discusses policies around data sharing, citation and genomic data. It presents the concept of a digital commons for computing platforms, digital objects and search/indexing to support data sharing and analysis.
Proquest
ProQuest Medical Library provides access to authoritative medical databases and resources. It contains full-text journals and doctoral dissertations across medicine, nursing, allied health, psychology, and health administration. The databases include MEDLINE, Health & Medical Complete, Nursing & Allied Health Source, Psychology Journals, and Health Management, which cover key subjects and include journals with high impact factors. ProQuest Medical Library offers a comprehensive collection of important medical titles and other complementary resources to support research.
NIH rigor and reproducibility.use of animals in research.msu 2.16
An overview of the National Institutes of Health new rules that aim to improve the rigor and reproducibility of research, especially research involving animals.
Cohcrane Library
The Cochrane Library is a collection of six healthcare databases that contain different types of evidence including Cochrane Reviews (systematic reviews), clinical trials, methodology studies, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations to inform healthcare decision making. It allows users to browse or search across databases, read editorials and special collections, listen to podcasts, and access the Cochrane Journal Club.
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...Cochrane.Collaboration
This document discusses cross-group collaboration between the Cochrane Collaboration and other organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) on priority setting. It identifies challenges like communication, timeliness, transparency, and determining who/how to support work. Solutions proposed include designating leadership to facilitate communication, standardizing processes, and using a mix of commissioned and investigator-initiated work to meet different partner priorities.香港六合彩
冷静想，代表不了什么，也许只因为好笑而笑，别说一笑泯恩仇，说不定还一笑添新愁。香港六合彩想起唐伯虎与秋香故事，心里像咬了一口青梅子。人家秋香的笑多有味，笑成千古流芳的美好姻缘。提到姻缘，子允觉得好怪。香港六合彩是在为一个女生烦恼，还根本没想到过这事跟姻缘那种事有什么直接关系，现在是现在，未来是未来，就像小巴鱼是小巴鱼，河豚是河豚，尽管小巴鱼长大了就是河豚，但小巴鱼多清纯飘逸？河豚多怪异恶心？而且还剧毒，两者不属本质区别那也属于根本区别。子允这样想着，差点把身边王峰忘掉，王峰再次问及，才不好意思的一五一十来说，当说到周晨晨为自己买护膝时，发现王峰有些憔悴的面容上眉头一颤。子允更卖力说，不愿香港六合彩听得不过瘾还特意加上香油和(又鸟)精。说完子允望着王峰，等着这个还没取得过初级资格证书的高参为自己的窘境作出准确判断并开出经典妙方，得到的，却是一脸茫然。过了会王峰如梦初醒说，你应该好好珍惜香港六合彩。子允听得一头雾水，香港六合彩说这个干嘛？对于这点自己很清楚，不然也不会这么着急。如果过不了这关，连珍惜的资格都没有。见子允挠头，王峰意识到失言，忙道，我在分析这事的重要性，以及它的不可拖延性，从而确定香港六合彩解决问题的方针，你的明白？子允见香港六合彩恢复住日调侃不上税的境界，这才增添信任地继续探讨，我想放学后，由你想办法把王秀引开，我瞅机会把周晨晨拦下，向香港六合彩解释清楚。别太冲动，你把一个生自己气的女孩单独留下，是谁都不会愿意。王峰分析道。有道理，究竟旁观者清。那我不拦香港六合彩，又怎么和香港六合彩说上话？子允并不知道拦下后说什么，怎么说，但香港六合彩坚信，争取到单独交谈机会才有希望。我看你适合做路霸，怎么老想着拦人？反而给人没头脑感觉，女孩最喜欢男生睿智，何况周晨晨这样有头脑有个性女孩……王峰说得认真，子允听得仔细，渐渐的，子允因为王峰像过来人教导自己，有种错位中的趣味。王峰见子允一脸坏笑，停下来，猜到香港六合彩要说什么。子允嘴快，机关枪式的，嘿嘿，峰哥真看不出啊，一直以为踢球你一流，打架一流，泡妞准没谱，想不到你比我还无师自通，简直全能啊！哈哈，厉害！如此透彻的分析会出自你这个黑脸包公。子允边笑边说，边说边笑，然后往假石山洞里钻，担心王峰拍肩膀。王峰惩罚人也喜欢拍肩膀，很重，很疼，却不失朋友之情。《Y滋味》招架不住王峰被子允攻击得招架不住，强装镇定的脸并不争气，漫山红遍，层林尽染。子允又抓到机会，上气不接下气说，哟，脸红什么，真是黑里透红与众不同。王峰哑口无言，干瞪眼。如此一逗
Clinical Microbiology - searching for information
This document provides an introduction to searching for medical information through the Queen Mary University library website and various databases and search tools. It outlines key learning objectives around using the library website, searching online for quality health information, and effectively using medical databases and EndNote. Specific databases and search engines introduced include Evidence Search, TRIP, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library. Search techniques like broadening terms, narrowing searches, phrase searching, and subject headings are also covered.
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes a presentation on the transferability of data and evidence between countries for healthcare decision making. It discusses guidelines around transferring treatment effects, baseline risks, costs and utilities. It also describes approaches to improve transferability, such as identifying networks for collaboration, assessing efficacy transferability through value of information analysis, and addressing differences in patient-reported outcome reporting across cultures. The presentation evaluates challenges to transferring evidence internationally and innovative methods that could help overcome issues with accessibility, applicability and availability of data between jurisdictions.MCC 2011 - Slide 24
This document discusses systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It provides information on Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH). It also discusses how to set up a protocol for a systematic review, including determining study design, selection criteria, treatment arms and statistical considerations. The Cochrane Collaboration is mentioned as performing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to evaluate healthcare interventions.
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
The document summarizes key themes from a webinar on developing medical policies and coverage guidelines for next generation sequencing in oncology. It discusses the challenges of evaluating genomic tests and gaining insurance coverage. Recommendations include requiring laboratories to obtain accreditation for analytic validity, covering small gene panels when clinical utility is established, and facilitating data collection to support coverage of larger tests and off-label drug use. The webinar included perspectives from various stakeholders on addressing these issues.
Cadth 2015 a1 panel1
This document discusses the development of the Evaluation Platform in COPD (EPIC) model. The model aims to evaluate COPD case detection strategies and their impact on outcomes like costs and quality of life. It uses a whole disease modeling approach with discrete event simulation to model the natural history of COPD. Evidence from studies like the Lung Health Study will be synthesized to model disease progression markers like FEV1 decline over time. The model will be calibrated against data sources and engaged stakeholders to ensure it is useful for evaluating COPD policies and guidelines. The challenges include gaining meaningful clinical input and ensuring sustainability, but the conceptual framework is expected to further understanding of COPD and allow flexible evaluation of different research questions.
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...Office of Health Economics
This document summarizes a panel discussion on how health technology assessments (HTAs) in Asia can respond to increased clinical uncertainty through the potential use of outcomes-based risk sharing agreements (PBRSAs). The panel focused on implementing risk sharing in the region, examining case studies from other areas, and identifying barriers and opportunities. It provided an overview of PBRSAs in the US and Europe, discussed feasibility challenges, and outlined alternatives to outcomes-based risk sharing that payers could consider at drug launch.Evaluating the priority setting processes used across the Cochrane Collaboration
This document discusses various methods that Cochrane entities use to prioritize topics for future Cochrane reviews. It identifies 17 entities that do not have a priority setting process and 27 that do or plan to. Common criteria for priority setting include clinical relevance, importance of the topic, impact on outcomes, and importance to specific populations. The document evaluates different approaches like the "Accountability for Reasonableness" framework and compares criteria like inclusiveness and equity. It poses discussion questions about selecting and applying criteria, evidence mapping, and integrating priority setting into the Collaboration's entities and strategies.
What's hot (17)
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...
Incorporating systematic reviews into other systematic reviews: Can we save t...
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources
Sharing, Reproducibility, Replication – AN NIH View
Sharing, Reproducibility, Replication – AN NIH View
NIH rigor and reproducibility.use of animals in research.msu 2.16
NIH rigor and reproducibility.use of animals in research.msu 2.16
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...
Open Discussion: Working together or working apart: Cross-group cooperation i...
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...
Availability, accessibility and applicability of evidence: Transferability - ...
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...
How can HTA’s in Asia respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty: the potentia...
Evaluating the priority setting processes used across the Cochrane Collaboration
Evaluating the priority setting processes used across the Cochrane Collaboration
Similar to A wiki for cancer treatment guidelines - Jutta von Dinklage
Cochrane Library Training
This document provides an overview of a workshop on using the Cochrane Library to train health librarians. The workshop covers introductions, an overview of Cochrane and systematic reviews, a demonstration of searching the Cochrane Library database, and small group work. Participants learn about finding and critically appraising systematic reviews to help inform evidence-based healthcare practices and decisions.
Introduction
The document summarizes the structure and purpose of the Canadian Cochrane Network & Centre which is part of the global Cochrane Collaboration. It outlines the workshop plan and provides an overview of systematic reviews and the Cochrane review process. Key parts of the Cochrane Collaboration include Cochrane Centres, Review Groups, Methods Groups, and The Cochrane Library database.
How to comment on a Cochrane review
This document provides guidance for consumers on how to effectively comment on Cochrane reviews and protocols. It outlines the importance of the consumer perspective in adding value and relevance. Consumer input can help identify priorities, clarify language, and ensure the review is meaningful. The document reviews the steps in producing a Cochrane review from registering the title to disseminating the final review. It addresses common concerns consumers may have and provides tips for submitting constructive feedback.
Journal club 1
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
Journal club final secrets v2 ss1
1. The document discusses the history and objectives of journal clubs, which began in the 1800s as a way for physicians to critically discuss recent medical literature.
2. Journal clubs aim to improve knowledge and skills in evidence-based medicine, communication, and quality improvement by changing practices based on evidence.
3. Studies have found that journal clubs may be effective in improving reading habits, knowledge of epidemiology and biostatistics, and use of medical literature, though their impact on critical appraisal skills requires more research.
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
The document outlines the development of CARE (Case Report) guidelines for writing clinical case reports. It describes a three-phase consensus process used to develop reporting recommendations based on literature reviews, interviews, and feedback from medical experts. The guidelines provide a standardized structure for case reports to improve their clinical usefulness and ensure rigorous reporting.
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
The case report guidelines were developed using a three-phase consensus process that included (1) literature research and interviews before the conference to produce items for the reporting criteria, (2) a face-to-face meeting to draught reporting guidelines and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines.
Learn More : https://bit.ly/3HEzHbs
Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/case-report-writing/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scien...
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scientists and health researchers presented by Luke van Rhoon Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway November 2020
Priority Setting Presentation Freiburg
This document discusses methods for identifying priority topics for future Cochrane reviews, specifically regarding their relevance to low- and middle-income countries. It identifies several existing approaches used by Cochrane entities for priority setting and evaluates them based on criteria like inclusiveness, equity, and accountability. The document also outlines challenges like relying on volunteer work and a lack of funding. It proposes comparing different priority setting processes using a framework that evaluates objectives, criteria, implementation, and transparency. Key discussion questions focus on selecting and applying criteria, consulting stakeholders, and integrating priority setting with current Cochrane roles and new funding opportunities.
IHP 525 Final Project Article Review Guidelines and Rubric
IHP 525 Final Project Article Review Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
There are two final projects in this course. One is an article review and the other is a data analysis.
Regardless of their field of interest, health professionals across disciplines need to be able to analyze and use biostatistical data to address health concerns
among the populations they serve. They need to be able to identify trends, draw conclusions, and make recommendations for improving health outcomes based
on solid evidence. It is also important that they are able to communicate that information effectively to those directly or indirectly impacted. They also need to
understand what others are doing in their field, the strengths and limitations of that work, and how it affects their own organization, even if they do not intend
to become statisticians.
The two summative assessments for this course lay the foundation for these critical skills. Final Project Article Review asks you to evaluate the strengths and
limitations of existing biostatistical articles and to identify the selection process of appropriate methodologies in different contexts (Final Project Article Review).
You will present your analysis through a written executive summary geared toward an audience of fellow health professionals. In the Final Project Data Analysis,
you will calculate descriptive and inferential statistics of a small data set. You will explain the basic parameters of the data, graph it, and run simple hypothesis
tests. You will present your analysis in a statistical report geared toward a non-technical audience, draw conclusions, and make recommendations for further
research.
For your Final Project Article Review, you will review and analyze published research that you might encounter as a health professional. You will select two
journal articles from the provided list on a topic of interest. You will create an article review that identifies the articles and their relevance to your field;
summarizes the articles, including their findings; compares and contrasts the statistical methods used in the articles; explains why the methods used were
appropriate; discusses their limitations; and concludes with recommendations for future work.
Final Project Article Review is divided into three journals, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality
final submissions. These article journals will be submitted in Modules Two, Five, and Six. The completed article review will be submitted in Module Eight.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
● Analyze the role of biostatistics for its impact on professional decision making in the public health, nursing, or health science fields
● Interpret key biostatistical metrics, methods, and data for addressing population-based health problems
● Evaluate the quality and limitations of published public health, nurs ...
PHAA_SRworkshop07.ppt
Systematic reviews provide a rigorous and unbiased summary of the evidence on a particular health issue or intervention. This document outlines key aspects of systematic reviews, including:
- Systematic reviews follow a structured process to minimize bias, including formulating a clear question, conducting a comprehensive search, and critically appraising and synthesizing the evidence.
- The Cochrane Collaboration produces high-quality systematic reviews to inform health policy and practice. The Cochrane Health Promotion & Public Health Field represents the needs of health promotion and public health within Cochrane.
- Conducting a good systematic review requires asking a focused and answerable question using the PICO framework, performing a comprehensive search across multiple databases and sources, and documenting
Peer review explained: Ayurveda Context
This document discusses the peer review process for Ayurveda research publications. It covers what peer review is, specific points reviewers examine in manuscripts, strengths and weaknesses of peer review, and common problems with Ayurveda manuscripts. Peer review aims to select quality research for publication and funding by having experts evaluate manuscripts. Reviewers check that studies are scientifically sound and address important problems. However, peer review also has weaknesses like bias, and Ayurveda research faces issues like limited specialized journals and unfamiliarity with international standards. The document advocates for training researchers in writing for publication and following reporting guidelines to strengthen Ayurveda research.
9. Systematic review _Journal Club.pdf
This document discusses different types of reviews for summarizing evidence, including narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. It provides details on the key elements of systematic reviews, including formulating a clear question, conducting a comprehensive search, selecting and appraising studies in an unbiased manner, synthesizing data which may include meta-analysis, and interpreting results. Systematic reviews use more rigorous methods than narrative reviews to minimize bias and allow results to be replicated. The document also discusses finding, appraising, and applying evidence from systematic reviews to inform health promotion programs and policies.
Development and Evaluation of clinical practice guideline (CPG) in psychiatry
The document discusses guidelines for clinical practice in psychiatry. It covers the development and evaluation of guidelines. Guideline development involves establishing a group with relevant expertise, systematically reviewing evidence, developing recommendations, and updating over time. Evaluation tools like AGREE assess guidelines across several domains including rigor of development, applicability, and independence. Most guidelines have room for improvement in areas like stakeholder involvement and addressing implementation. Indian guidelines aim to be relevant to local practice but could better integrate Indian research evidence.
Systematic Review-Scoping Review
Presenting a published paper:
"Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review
approach"
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
This document provides a summary of a report on the effectiveness of continuing professional development (CPD). The report was commissioned by the General Medical Council and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and involved researchers interviewing medical practitioners and educators across specialties about their experiences with and views on CPD.
Key findings from the research included that conferences, local events, and journals were the most commonly reported CPD activities. Interest, addressing knowledge gaps, and reflection on practice were most influential in determining CPD participation. The greatest impacts of CPD were found to be changes in treatment practice, knowledge acquisition, and learner satisfaction. Colleges and faculties were most often identified as responsible for CPD provision and content. Experience was most often reported
Duplicate yhdue
This report explores the effectiveness of continuing professional development (CPD) for doctors. It involved interviews and questionnaires with doctors from a range of specialties and roles.
Key findings include: Conference and local event attendance were the most common CPD activities. Interest, knowledge gaps, and reflection on practice were the top drivers for CPD. The greatest impact of CPD was seen in changes to treatment practice, knowledge acquisition, and learner satisfaction. Study leave availability, cost, and work-life balance were the top barriers to CPD participation. Colleges and faculties were seen as the top providers and determiners of CPD content. Workplace learning was seen as highly effective but difficult to systematically assess. Formal CPD
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
This document provides a summary of a report on the effectiveness of continuing professional development (CPD). The report was commissioned by the General Medical Council and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and involved researchers interviewing medical practitioners and educators across specialties about their experiences with and views on CPD.
Key findings from the research included that conferences, local events, and journals were the most commonly reported CPD activities. Determinants of effective CPD included interest, addressing knowledge gaps, and reflection. The greatest impacts of CPD were reported as changes in treatment practice, knowledge acquisition, and learner satisfaction. Barriers to CPD participation included availability of study leave, costs, and work-life balance issues.
The discussion analyzed
Duplicate yhdue
This document provides a summary of a report on the effectiveness of continuing professional development (CPD). The report was commissioned by the General Medical Council and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and involved researchers interviewing medical practitioners and educators across specialties about their experiences with and views on CPD.
Key findings from the research included that conferences, local events, and journals were the most commonly reported CPD activities. Interest, addressing knowledge gaps, and reflection on practice were most influential in determining CPD participation. The greatest impacts of CPD were found to be changes in treatment practice, knowledge acquisition, and learner satisfaction. Colleges and faculties were most often identified as responsible for CPD provision and content. Experience was most often reported
InstructionsFinal ProjectThe Final Project should demonstrat.docx
Instructions
Final Project
The Final Project should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research and the application of new knowledge. It should utilize previous skills developed in foundational health care courses and apply them within the context and viewpoint of a health care administrator and their role in managing health and human services.
For the Final Project, select one of the following topics and conduct scholarly and professional research while integrating the course’s learning outcomes to address a selected topic:
Research specific leadership and management traits and theories necessary for managing a multidisciplinary and multicultural health care organization to promote organizational effectiveness.
Present how strategic planning, performance improvement, and information systems are interrelated and fundamental to the delivery of quality health care.
Examine the financial characteristics of health care delivery along with managing costs, revenues, and human resources.
Analyze ethical and legal concepts, including specific federal regulations, required of health care organizations to ensure the delivery of high quality health care that protects patient safety.
Research Requirements
Academic research and papers must meet certain standards of quality that are recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality academic research?
The use of primary (original), credible sources written by experts in the field of study.
Ensuring secondary sources are supported by research in primary sources.
Making sure all research is relevant and that material used is pertinent to the area of study.
In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required.
Keep in mind that educational websites may be appropriate, in some cases, but should be evaluated carefully.
The Ashford University Library offers many excellent databases and other resources to assist you in conducting scholarly research.
What sources are not acceptable for academic research and referencing?
Encyclopedias
Dictionaries
Wikipedia, other wikis, or blogs
Websites and other sources that do not provide quality researched materials (e.g., they do not use credible sources to support the information in the document).
All research must reflect professional academic protocol and must be documented according to APA standards as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Creating the Final Project
You may choose to present your research is the form of an eight- to ten-page research paper (excluding title and reference pages) or a comprehensive 10- to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation (excluding title and reference slides) with detailed speaker notes. In either case, the content of the assignment must include each of the elements listed below:
Introduction
Describe the issue. Include why it was selected, the perspective of your approac.
Similar to A wiki for cancer treatment guidelines - Jutta von Dinklage (20)
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
Care guidelines developing clinical case reporting recommendations – pubrica
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scien...
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scien...
IHP 525 Final Project Article Review Guidelines and Rubric
IHP 525 Final Project Article Review Guidelines and Rubric
Development and Evaluation of clinical practice guideline (CPG) in psychiatry
Development and Evaluation of clinical practice guideline (CPG) in psychiatry
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
The effectiveness of continuing professional development
InstructionsFinal ProjectThe Final Project should demonstrat.docx
InstructionsFinal ProjectThe Final Project should demonstrat.docx
More from nswkmforum
Are the days of the traditional intranet numbered? Alister Webb
The traditional centralized Intranet model is becoming outdated and less relevant as users now access information across various social and collaborative platforms. A case study of a SharePoint project at Telstra called "Our Knowledge" showed how it was more distributed, allowing different views and collaboration depending on users' roles. Going forward, the future Intranet model may be more personalized and app-based, tailored to specific tasks or functions on both desktop and mobile, replacing the need to visit separate Intranet, collaboration and knowledge platforms. This new "MyWorkspace" approach would bring relevant information and apps directly to individual users.
Investing In A System - Ian Miller
This document discusses investing and psychology. It mentions investing in systems, purposive engagement over time, uncertainty and emotion. It also references firms, markets, investors, interactions between investors, behavior, external factors and balancing objectives with subjectivity around loss and personal requirements.
Role of KM in e-maintenance
This document discusses a research proposal on the role of knowledge management (KM) in reducing the bullwhip effect in spare parts supply chain management (SPSCM). The proposal aims to study how KM capabilities and infrastructure can help reduce information distortion between customer demand and supplier orders. It reviews relevant literature on KM capabilities, infrastructure, and systems/technologies in SPSCM. The proposed methodology is a quantitative experiment using the beer game simulation under different KM strategy conditions to analyze the impact on the bullwhip effect.
Managing knowledge we don’t want: Emotion in Organisations
This document discusses the management of emotions in organizations. It notes that bureaucracy aims to eliminate personal, irrational and emotional elements from business. However, some argue this leads to the "dehumanization" of organizations. The document also discusses concepts like "emotion engineering" where companies try to control employees' emotions for commercial gain. It poses questions about what might happen if leaders expressed emotion more freely, relationships were better managed, and emotion was viewed as a source of intelligence rather than something to be avoided.
Ignorance management Sydney March 2011
The document discusses collective ignorance and collective stupidity within organizations. It outlines three mechanisms for collective cognition: culture, infrastructure, and mutual ignorance. It also describes five "tyrannies of the collective" that can produce ignorance, including: the tyranny of role, where people are bound by their predefined roles; the tyranny of plans, where plans are stubbornly adhered to despite changing realities; the tyranny of infrastructure, where existing systems resist change; the tyranny of culture, where cultural norms inhibit new ideas; and the tyranny of the feast, where greed and herd behavior can lead organizations astray.
KM Challenges in a Global Environment
This document summarizes a presentation given by Mark Andrews on the knowledge management challenges faced by the global law firm Baker & McKenzie and how they address them. Baker & McKenzie has offices in 39 countries and over 10,000 employees who speak 70 languages. To manage knowledge across cultures, the firm has a global knowledge management team, governance structure through practice groups, and technologies like SharePoint and Recommind. The firm also evaluates employees' legal knowledge and expertise as well as their contribution to knowledge sharing as part of performance reviews.
2009 Survey
The document summarizes feedback from a survey of the NSW KM Forum member experience. Respondents provided suggestions to: 1) continue collaborating with other professional groups to broaden topics and networking opportunities; 2) maintain a balance of theoretical and practical presentations incorporating hands-on activities; and 3) cover emerging topics such as knowledge management in complex projects, e-learning developments, and demonstrating ROI for knowledge management. Keeping the forum relevant by addressing new concepts and technologies was also recommended.
Jye Smith
This document discusses 5 lessons about conferences that can be learned from attending heavy metal concerts. It notes that the best parts of a conference will be at the end like a headlining band, the importance is experiencing a conference in person rather than just following online, atmosphere and performance are important like at a concert, and most importantly there will be networking opportunities just like enjoying the music at a concert.
Stephen Lead Ignite
The document discusses conferences and presentations. It notes that 93% of conferences suck and most of them suck. It then criticizes typical conference sessions for consisting of bullet point overload. The final lines promote an Ignite format conference for helping to cut out unnecessary content from presentations.
Future of Conferences John Allsopp
This document discusses various topics related to connecting people on the internet and hosting conferences and events. It touches on randomness, sharing common interests, inspiring and entertaining attendees, engaging speakers, creating a good atmosphere with food, building a community, supporting other events, and the future of conferences. The document credits different individuals at the end of many lines but does not provide much context or narrative.
Be2camp Technology Jodie Miners
Be2camp is an unconference focused on how web 2.0 technologies can help improve sustainability in the built environment. Be2camp 1 was held in London in 2008, and Be2camp North will be held in Liverpool in May 2009. The organizers use various web tools like Skype, Twitter, and Ning to organize meetings and discussions. At events, participants can engage live in the room, virtually through streaming video and blogging, or via Second Life. Over 50 people attended Be2camp 2008 in person and online. Recordings of the event received over 170 views. Lessons from Be2camp included using free web tools, ensuring good WiFi, and encouraging online discussions.
Blended Facilitation by Ed Mitchell
The document discusses a case study of the Media Sandbox project, which used a "blended facilitation" approach to bring together online and offline collaboration. Blended facilitation strategically plans and delivers models that combine virtual and physical collaboration to achieve organizational goals. The Media Sandbox facilitated knowledge sharing and networking across blogs, mailing lists, events and other tools. It engaged participants in roles like project workers, facilitators and community members to build knowledge assets accessible in both online and offline spaces.
World Nomads by Christy McCarthy
Presentation on World Nomads by Christ McCarthy given to NSW KM Forum. Online Communities session Feb 2009.
Wikia and Wikipedia by Angela Beesley
Presentation given to NSW KM Forum by Angela Beesley on wikis, Wikia & Wikipedia. Part of Online Comunities Feb 2009
More from nswkmforum (15)
Are the days of the traditional intranet numbered? Alister Webb
Are the days of the traditional intranet numbered? Alister Webb
Managing knowledge we don’t want: Emotion in Organisations
Managing knowledge we don’t want: Emotion in Organisations
Recently uploaded
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
The Best Ayurvedic Antacid Tablets in India
Treat the symptoms of indigestion, heartburn and stomach reflux with the 10 Best Ayurvedic Antacid Tablets in India.
Light House Retreats: Plant Medicine Retreat Europe
Our aim is to organise conscious gatherings and retreats for open and inquisitive minds and souls, with and without the assistance of sacred plants.
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
It includes regulation of combination products and medical devices. FDA and industry liaisons.
The Electrocardiogram - Physiologic Principles
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Journal Article Review on Rasamanikya
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
STIs may cause PID. For the both disease, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
Osteoporosis is an increasing cause of morbidity among the elderly.
In this document , a brief outline of osteoporosis is given , including the risk factors of osteoporosis fractures , the indications for testing bone mineral density and the management of osteoporosis
Top-Vitamin-Supplement-Brands-in-India List
Swisschem Dermacare provides the Top 10 Vitamin Supplement Brands in India. To know more about us give us call at our official number
Efficacy of Avartana Sneha in Ayurveda
Avartana Sneha is a unique method of Preparation of Sneha Kalpana in Ayurveda, mainly it is indicated for the Vataja rogas.
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control program
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
ABDOMINAL TRAUMA in pediatrics part one.
Abdominal trauma in pediatrics refers to injuries or damage to the abdominal organs in children. It can occur due to various causes such as falls, motor vehicle accidents, sports-related injuries, and physical abuse. Children are more vulnerable to abdominal trauma due to their unique anatomical and physiological characteristics. Signs and symptoms include abdominal pain, tenderness, distension, vomiting, and signs of shock. Diagnosis involves physical examination, imaging studies, and laboratory tests. Management depends on the severity and may involve conservative treatment or surgical intervention. Prevention is crucial in reducing the incidence of abdominal trauma in children.
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Basavarajeeyam - Ayurvedic heritage book of Andhra pradesh
Basavarajeeyam is an important text for ayurvedic physician belonging to andhra pradehs. It is a popular compendium in various parts of our country as well as in andhra pradesh. The content of the text was presented in sanskrit and telugu language (Bilingual). One of the most famous book in ayurvedic pharmaceutics and therapeutics. This book contains 25 chapters called as prakaranas. Many rasaoushadis were explained, pioneer of dhatu druti, nadi pareeksha, mutra pareeksha etc. Belongs to the period of 15-16 century. New diseases like upadamsha, phiranga rogas are explained.
Recently uploaded (20)
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
Light House Retreats: Plant Medicine Retreat Europe
Light House Retreats: Plant Medicine Retreat Europe
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
Ear and its clinical correlations By Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Ear and its clinical correlations By Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control program
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control program
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Basavarajeeyam - Ayurvedic heritage book of Andhra pradesh
Basavarajeeyam - Ayurvedic heritage book of Andhra pradesh
A wiki for cancer treatment guidelines - Jutta von Dinklage
- 1. A wiki for cancer treatment guidelines
- 2. What are clinical practice guidelines? “Systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances’ (Field and Lohr, 1992). Content is based on a systematic review of clinical evidence - the main source for evidence-based care.
- 3. NHMRC Process (NHMRC = National Health and Medical Research Council) Publication Dissemination Public consultation Review Independent review Peer review Submission to NHMRC Potential changes! Approval Same procedure after 5 years!!!!
- 5. The review of the review of the review of the review Exhausted clinical experts!
- 6. Problems with written guidelines Out of date
- 7. Problems with written guidelines Impact?
- 8. General problem Storage of previous knowledge?
- 9. A wiki to develop and disseminate clinical practice guidelines Better & cheaper literature search, citation and critical appraisal handling Up-to-date, living guidelines (iterative publishing possible) Lots of people doing a little bit each Stakeholder engagement Transparency Flexible, scalable & affordable
- 10. A wiki to develop and publish guidelines
- 11. The new way 6) “Wiki-fication” of content & dissemination 1) Establish WP party and guideline objectives
- 14. Guideline development Critical appraisal of literature
- 15. The wiki critical appraisal form
- 16. Body of evidence table
- 18. Evidence summaries and recommendations
- 23. Public consultation - Comment
- 24. Public consultation – Submit new evidence
- 25. Updating a guideline chunk The 3 sources where papers come from: 1) Automatic electronic alerts of new papers 2) The small group of authors whose expertise is the chunk, will feed in 3) The larger public, including professional bodies, external experts, health professionals, consumers, alerts
- 26. Updating a guideline chunk The group responsible for a chunk is a standing committee Responsible to address comments Whenever a new paper appears in their work space they analyse it and decide whether it contained new information that would alter the guideline and change the chunk accordingly and in a timely manner A chunk can be changed/updated without affecting the rest of the guidelines
- 27. Audit trail Each guideline content page lists a serious of appendices to provide transparency about recommendation grading and body of evidence User can also access pending evidence that hasn’t yet been incorporated
- 28. Guideline dissemination, implementation and evaluation Developing e-learning modules Detailed web analytics
- 29. Spaced Education e-learning modules Screenshot Spaced Education Online Module
- 30. Web analytics How people are navigating the site
- 31. Next steps Custom-designed skin, improved UI
- 32. Next steps Incentives for our volunteers Generation Y need reward The obvious: Authorship of a chunk would be recorded and possibly attract CME points? Chunk authors could be authorised to be able to use the literature reviews to write review articles for journals What else?
- 33. The next level?
- 34. Acknowledgement Prof Ian Olver, CEO Cancer Council Australia Christine Vuletich, Manager - Clinical Guidelines Network Alisha Dorrigan, Project Officer Alice Winter-Irving, Project Officer Endometrial and lung cancer working party Technical support Andrew Garrett, Lead Developer Dr Bob Jansen, IT Consultant Mediawiki skin Redwerks (web design agency) Website: wiki.cancer.org.au/australia
Editor's Notes
- Evidence-based guidelines: We want guideline based on best available evidence, don’t want to miss relevant papers, so we are looking improving the literature search process and sustainabilityMore decentralised model: We still have a working party and management committee that oversees a guideline, but in our new model we are splitting guidelines into chunks of information and each chunk is taken care of by an author who nominates two co-authors to help him/her update the chunk and resolve conflict