This document discusses key concepts in qualitative research including its definition, purpose, characteristics, approaches, technical issues, and ethics. The qualitative research process involves six general steps: identifying a topic, reviewing literature, selecting participants, collecting data, analyzing data, and reporting results. Some qualitative approaches described are case study, ethnography, grounded theory, and phenomenology. Ensuring validity, reliability, and addressing ethics are important considerations for qualitative research.
2. State the definition and purpose of qualitative
research.
1.1 Define qualitative research.
1.2 Describe the purpose of qualitative
research.
1.3 Identify four unique characteristics
of qualitative research.
3. Describe the six steps in the qualitative
research process.
2.1 Describe the six steps of the
qualitative research process.
2.2 Compare the six steps used to
conduct qualitative research with the six
steps used to conduct quantitative
research.
4. Identify different qualitative research
approaches.
3.1 Describe the primary difference
among qualitative research
approaches.
3.2 Identify nine qualitative research
approaches and discuss the unique
characteristics of each.
5. Describe the characteristics of qualitative
research.
4.1 Describe eight unique
characteristics of qualitative research.
6. State the definition of validity in
qualitative research.
5.1 Define the term validity and identify
two of its components.
7. Describe strategies to address the trustworthiness
(validity) of qualitative research
6.1 Describe four issues Guba suggests the
researcher address in order to establish
trustworthiness.
6.2 Describe five issues Maxwell suggests the
researcher address to establish understanding.
6.3 Describe thirteen strategies Wolcott believes will
enhance validity.
8. Describe strategies to address the
replicability (reliability) of qualitative
research.
7.1 Define the term reliability.
7.2 Discuss how reliability should be
viewed in qualitative research.
9. Describe the relationship between validity
and reliability in qualitative research.
8.1 Discuss why generalizability is NOT
an issue in qualitative research.
10. Describe the role of ethics in qualitative
research.
9.1 Describe the role of ethics in qualitative research.
9.2 Discuss why it is important to think about possible
ethical dilemmas in a qualitative research study
before they become a problem.
9.3 Identify two reasons why confidentiality is
important in qualitative research and the way in which
it is usually assured.
9.4 Identify six ethical guidelines that should be
followed when conducting qualitative research.
11. Topics Discussed in this Session
Definition and purpose of qualitative
research
General steps involved in qualitative
research
Qualitative research approaches
Characteristics of qualitative research
Validity, reliability, and generalizability
Ethics
12. The Nature of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research is the collection,
analysis, and interpretation of
comprehensive narrative data in order
to gain insights into a particular
phenomenon of interest
Useful for describing and answering
questions about participants and contexts
Objective 1.1
13. The Nature of Qualitative Research
Purpose of qualitative research
Promote a deep, holistic understanding of
a particular phenomenon
Importance of exploring qualitative
topics
Provide insight into the complexity of
common occurrences
Provide specific concrete details to guide
understanding in a particular setting
Objectives 1.2 and 1.3
14. The Nature of Qualitative Research
The importance of exploring qualitative
topics (continued)
Provide insight into the “local” meanings
that activities and practices have for
participants
Develop a comparative understanding of
phenomena as experienced by different
participants in different settings
Objective 1.3
15. The Nature of Qualitative Research
Six General Steps
Identify the research topic
Review the literature
Select the participants
Collect data
Analyze the data
Report the results
These are the same steps as those used in
quantitative research
Objectives 2.1 and 2.2
16. Range of Qualitative Approaches
Nine approaches
Case study
An effort to seek an understanding of a single person or
entity
Ethnography
An effort to describe and analyze all or part of the culture
of a community by identifying and describing participants’
practices and beliefs
Ethology
An effort to compare several cultures with one another
Objective 3.2
17. Range of Qualitative Approaches
Nine approaches (continued)
Ethnomethodology
An effort to examine people’s understanding of their daily
activities
Grounded theory
An effort to derive theory grounded in the perspectives of
the participants
Phenomenology
An effort to understand the meaning of an individual’s
experiences
Objective 3.2
18. Range of Qualitative Approaches
Nine approaches (continued)
Symbolic interaction
An effort to seek common understandings that emerge to
give meaning to participants’ interactions
Action research
An effort to seek a solution or improvement to a practical
problem in the setting in which it is occurring
Historical research
An effort to seek to understand the past by studying
documents, relics, and interviews
Objective 3.2
19. Features of Qualitative Approaches
Differences between approaches
Different social contexts are being studied
in each approach
The participants are selected for different
reasons in each approach
Objective 3.1
20. Features of Qualitative Approaches
Eight unique characteristics
Researchers immerse themselves in the situation
The data reflects the participants’ perspectives
Sources of data are real-world situations or natural
contexts
Data is narrative in nature
Researchers focus on personal interactions with
participants
Objective 4.1
21. Features of Qualitative Approaches
Eight unique characteristics (continued)
Researchers avoid early decisions or
assumptions about the study
Data are analyzed inductively
Methods provide clear, detailed information
reflecting participants’ voices
Objective 4.1
22. Technical Issues
Validity
The degree to which the qualitative data
collected accurately gauges what is being
measured
Two components
Trustworthiness
Understanding
Objective 5.1
23. Technical Issues
Validity
Trustworthiness
Credibility – taking into account all the complexities in the
study and addressing problems that are not easily
explained
Transferability – including descriptive, context-relevant
statements so the reader can identify with the setting
Dependability – collecting stable data
Confirmability – assuring the neutrality and objectivity of
the data
Objective 6.1
24. Technical Issues
Validity
Understanding
Descriptive validity – the factual accuracy of the account
Interpretive validity – the meaning attributed to the
behaviors or words of the participants
Theoretical validity – the explanation of the phenomenon
being studied in relation to a theory
Evaluative validity – sufficient objectivity in reporting data
to avoid bias, preconceived judgments, or evaluations
Objective 6.2
25. Technical Issues
13 strategies to ensure validity
Participate at the study site for a prolonged period
of time
Use persistent observation
Use peer debriefing
Collect mechanically recorded data
Use member checks
Establish structural corroboration/coherence
Establish referential adequacy
Objective 6.3
26. Technical Issues
13 strategies to ensure validity (cont.)
Collect detailed descriptive data
Develop detailed descriptions of the
context
Overlap methods (i.e., multi-methods)
Establish an audit trail
Practice triangulation
Practice reflexivity
Objective 6.3
27. Technical Issues
Reliability
The consistency with which data measures
what is being attempted to be measured
over time
Qualitative perspective
The reliability of the techniques that are being
used to collect data
Reliability is a necessary but not sufficient
characteristic – validity is the priority
Objectives 7.1 and 7.2
28. Technical Issues
Generalizability
The applicability of findings to settings and
contexts different from the one in which they were
obtained
Internal-external validity issues revisited
A depth of understanding can only be achieved from a
few participants in a very limited number of contexts
Generalizability is therefore very limited
Qualitative researchers are primarily concerned with
validity and reliability and to a much lesser extent
generalizability
Objective 8.1
29. Technical Issues
General strategies for ensuring the technical
merit of a qualitative study
Talk little, listen a lot
Record observation accurately
Begin writing early
Let readers see for themselves
Report fully
Be candid
Seek feedback
Write accurately
30. Ethical Issues
Ethics can be considered in terms of how the
researcher treats the participants in the
research setting.
The nature of qualitative research provides
the potential for conflict and harm.
Qualitative research is intimate – there is little
distance between the researcher and the
participants
Qualitative research is open-ended – the nature of
the process requires the use of an emergent
design as the situation unfolds
Objectives 9.1 and 9.2
31. Ethical Issues
Six guidelines to help avoid ethical problems
Researchers should have an ethical perspective
that is close to their personal ethical position
Informed consent should take the form of a
dialogue that mutually shapes the research and
the results
Confidentiality is more complicated even with the use of
pseudonyms
Consider the use of a video tape to illustrate a point
being made
Objective 9.4
32. Ethical Issues
Six guidelines to help avoid ethical problems
(cont.)
You should be able to identify broader social
principles that are an integral part of who you are
as a researcher and a contributing member of the
community in which you live.
Avoidance of harm morally binds qualitative
researchers to conduct their research in a manner
that minimizes potential harm to those involved in
the study.
Objective 9.4
33. Ethical Issues
Six guidelines to help avoid ethical problems
(cont.)
Even though an action can bring about good
results, it is not ethical unless it also conforms to
ethical standards such as honesty and justice.
The qualitative researcher must remain attentive
to the relationships between the researcher and
the participants – a relationship that is determined
by “roles, status, language, and cultural norms.”
Objective 9.4