Interaction

beyond communicative methodology
Learners should engage in L2
tasks designed to maximise
opportunities for good
interaction.
Chapelle, 1998
Intrinsically motivated learners or self-
regulated learners are more effective
learners because the locus of control is
internalised.


Vandergrift, 2008
networked multimedia environments
provide opportunities for asynchronous
and synchronous dialogue in which
meaning can be negotiated in modes
other than written or printed text. The
interactions between and among
learners… enhance the “learning as
knowledge” process.

Warshauer, 2000
• language learning is an interpretive process,
  requiring a transfer of control to the learner.
• teaching practices should be based on
  negotiation with learners.
• teachers should self-monitor and reflect upon
  their practices.

Benson and Voller, 1997
The appraisal system

•   novelty/familiarity
•    pleasantness
•   goal significance
•   coping potential
•   self/social image
Factors that support engagement

    Immediacy behaviours
    (Gorham, 1988; many others, across
    cultures; Rocca, 2004, Pogue & AhYun,
    2006)
What can we do to increase learner
   engagement in meaningful
          interaction?

Interaction

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Learners should engagein L2 tasks designed to maximise opportunities for good interaction. Chapelle, 1998
  • 3.
    Intrinsically motivated learnersor self- regulated learners are more effective learners because the locus of control is internalised. Vandergrift, 2008
  • 4.
    networked multimedia environments provideopportunities for asynchronous and synchronous dialogue in which meaning can be negotiated in modes other than written or printed text. The interactions between and among learners… enhance the “learning as knowledge” process. Warshauer, 2000
  • 5.
    • language learningis an interpretive process, requiring a transfer of control to the learner. • teaching practices should be based on negotiation with learners. • teachers should self-monitor and reflect upon their practices. Benson and Voller, 1997
  • 6.
    The appraisal system • novelty/familiarity • pleasantness • goal significance • coping potential • self/social image
  • 7.
    Factors that supportengagement Immediacy behaviours (Gorham, 1988; many others, across cultures; Rocca, 2004, Pogue & AhYun, 2006)
  • 9.
    What can wedo to increase learner engagement in meaningful interaction?