Instructor's Solutions Design of Concrete Structures – Arthur H. Nilson – 15th Edition
1. Instructor's Solutions Manual
to accompany
Design of Concrete Structures, 15th Edition
Nilson/Darwin/Dolan
The authors welcome feedback on the problem solutions and on the text in
general. Please e-mail any comments to David Darwin at: daved@ku.edu
PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
This Manual is the proprietary property of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. ("McGraw-Hill")
and protected by copyright and other state and federal laws. By opening and using this Manual
the user agrees to the following restrictions, and if the recipient does not agree to these
restrictions, the Manual should be promptly returned unopened to McGraw-Hill: This Manual is
being provided only to authorized professors and instructors for use in preparing for the
classes using the affiliated textbook. No other use or distribution of this Manual is permitted.
This Manual may not be sold and may not be distributed to or used by any student or other
third party. No part of this Manual may be reproduced, displayed or distributed in any form or
by any means, electronic or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the McGraw-Hill.
Name: Bahzad B.Sabr
Chapter (1) - Chapter (9)
B
a
h
z
a
d
2. Notes regarding reinforcement details.
In the following problems, the reinforcement details are compressed to clarify the problem solutions. The
reinforcement details are noted by the line:
Reinforcement details
Reinforcement is shown by bar size. Thus a No. 9 (No. 29) bar is As9. Expansion of the "Reinforcement
details" line gives all bar sizes and diameters, thus:
Reinforcement details
Area of Reinforcing Bars
As3 0.11in
2
As7 0.60in
2
As11 1.56in
2
As4 0.20in
2
As8 0.79in
2
As14 2.25in
2
As5 0.31in
2
As9 1.00in
2
As18 4.00in
2
As6 0.44in
2
As10 1.27in
2
Diameter of reinforcing bars
db3 0.375in
db7 0.875in
db11 1.410in
db4 0.500in
db8 1.000in
db14 1.693in
db5 0.625in
db9 1.128in
db18 2.257in
db6 0.750in
db10 1.27in
Reinforcement details
B
a
h
z
a
d
3. 1/3
1.1 The building in figure P.1 is used for general office space. The slab is 8 in. thick on a beam
12 in. wide by 18 in. deep, the bay dimensions are 18'-6” in the x direction and 21'-0” in the y
direction and the superimposed service dead load is 12 psf. Calculate the slab service load in psf
and the beam service load in klf.. (Solution: qs = 162 psf, wu = 3.12 klf).
SOLUTION
From table 1.1 Office load ql 50psf
Concrete unit weight γc 150pcf
t 8in
qd t γc
100 psf
Slab load
Superimprosed dead load qsdl 12psf
Service load qs ql qd
qsdl
162 psf
The beam length is 21 feet and the tributary width is 18.5 ft. The beam is 12 x 18 in. of which 10
in is below the slab.
wbeam 18in t
( ) 12
in γc
125 plf
ws 18.5ft ql
18.5ft qd qsdl
wbeam
3122 plf
ws 3.12 klf
1.2 The building in figure P.1 is used for general office space. The slab is 8 in. thick on a 12
in. wide x 18 in. deep beam, the bay dimensions are 18’-6” in the x direction and 21’-0” in the
y direction and the superimposed service dead load is 12 psf. Calculate the factored column
load transferred to column C3 on the 3rd
floor. (Solution: Pu = 86.4 kips).
SOLUTION γc 150pcf
ql 50psf
qsdl 12psf
Slab load
t 8in
qd t γc
100 psf
Tributary area At 18.5ft 21
ft 388.5 ft
2
wbeam 18in t
( ) 12
in γc
125 plf
Pu 1.6 At
ql
1.2 At
qd qsdl
1.2 wbeam
21
ft
86.4 kip
B
a
h
z
a
d
4. 2/3
1.3 The building in figure P.1 is used for general office space. The slab is 8 in. thick on beams
12 in. wide x 18 in. deep, the bay dimensions are 18’- 6” in the x direction and 21’- 0” in the y
direction and the superimposed service dead load is 12 psf. Calculate the slab factored load in
psf and the beam factored load in klf. Comment on your solution in comparison with problem
1.1.
γc 150pcf
ql 50psf
qsdl 12psf
SOLUTION
Slab load t 8in
qd t γc
100 psf
qu 1.6 ql
1.2 qd qsdl
214.4 psf
From problem 1.1
qu
qs
1.323
wbeam 18in t
( ) 12
in γc
125 plf
The tributaty width is . l 18.5ft
wu 1.6 ql
l
1.2 qd qsdl
l
wbeam
4.09 klf
Compare to problem 1.1 wu
ws
1.31
This ratio is between 1.2 and 1.6 and suggests that the majority of the load comes from long
term loadings.
1.4 A slab in figure P.1 is used for lobby space. The slab is 10 in. thick on a 14 in. wide x
24 in. deep beam, the bay dimensions are 21’- 0” in the x direction and 26’- 0” in the y
direction and the superimposed service dead load is 15 psf. Calculate the slab factored
load in psf and the beam factored load in klf.
SOLUTION
b 14in
h 24in
t 10in
qsdl 15psf
From Table 1.1 the lobbly live load is ql 100psf
γc 150pcf
qslab γc t
125 psf
wbeam h t
( ) b
γc
204 plf
qu 1.2 qslab qsdl
1.6 ql
328 psf
The beam tributary width length is l 21ft
wu qu l
1.2wbeam
7.13 klf
B
a
h
z
a
d
5. 3/3
1.5 The building in figure P.1 is used for light storage space. The slab is 10 in. thick on a 16 in. wide x 20
in. deep beam, the bay dimensions are 20’- 0” in the x direction and 25’- 0” in the y direction and the
superimposed sprinkler dead load is 4 psf. Calculate the slab factored load in psf and the beamfactored
load in klf.
SOLUTION
b 16in
h 20in
t 10in
qsdl 4psf
γc 150pcf
From Table 1.1 the light storage live load is ql 125psf
qslab γc t
125 psf
wbeam h t
( ) b
γc
167 plf
qu 1.2 qslab qsdl
1.6 ql
355 psf
The beam tributary width length is l 20ft
wu qu l
1.2wbeam
7.30 klf
1.6 The roof on the building in figure P.1 has a slab 7 in. thick on a 12 in. wide x 16 in. deep beam, the
bay dimensions are 19’- 0” in the x direction and 21’- 0” in the y direction and the superimposed service
dead load is 6 psf. Calculate the slab factored load in psf and the beamfactored load in klf.
SOLUTION
b 12in
h 16in
t 7in
qsdl 6psf
From Table 1.1 the roof live load is ql 20psf
γc 150pcf
qslab γc t
87.5 psf
wbeam h t
( ) b
γc
112 plf
qu 1.2 qslab qsdl
1.6 ql
144 psf
The beam tributary width length is l 18.5ft
wu qu l
1.2wbeam
2.80 klf
B
a
h
z
a
d
29. 1/2
3.1. A 16 × 20 in. column is made of the same concrete and reinforced with the same six No.
9 (No. 29) bars as the column in Examples 3.1 and 3.2, except t hat a steel with yield strength
f y = 40 ksi is used. The stress-strain diagram of this reinforcing steel is shown in Fig. 2.15 for
fy = 40 ksi. For this column determine ( a ) the axial load that will stress the concrete to 1200
psi; ( b ) the load at which the steel starts yielding; ( c ) the maximum load; and ( d ) the share
of the total load carried by the reinforcement at these three stages of loading. Compare results
with those calculated in the examples for f y = 60 ksi, keeping in mind, in regard to relative
economy, that the price per pound for reinforcing steels with 40 and 60 ksi yield points is about
the same.
20
16
As 6.0in
2
Ag 16in 20
in 320 in
2
Ac Ag As
314 in
2
f'c 4000psi
fy 40000psi
fy1 60000psi
Ec 3600000psi
Es 29000000psi
n
Es
Ec
8.1
Part a The solution is identical for grade 40 and grade 60 reinforcement
fc 1200psi
P fc Ac n As
434800 lbf
Ps fc n
As
58000 lbf
Ps
P
0.133
The steel carries 13.3 percent of the load
Part b
εy
fy
Es
0.00138
εy1
fy1
Es
0.00207
For slow loading fc 3000psi
fc1 3300psi
P1 Ac fc1
As fy1
1396200 lbf
P Ac fc
As fy
1182000 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
360000 lbf
Ps As fy
240000 lbf
Ps1
P1
0.258
Ps
P
0.203
B
a
h
z
a
d
30. 2/2
Problem 3.1
Part c
fc 3400psi
Pu1 Ac fc
As fy1
1427600 lbf
Pu Ac fc
As fy
1307600 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
360000 lbf
Ps As fy
240000 lbf
Ps1
Pu
0.275
Ps
Pu
0.184
Comments
1. There is no difference at fc = 1200 psi and elastic assumptions are used
2. As the strain increases, the steel with fy = 60,000 psi contributes more to the total load and
the column has a higher total capacity
3. Grade 40 and Grade 40 have the same cost, therefore Grade 60 provides a 9% increase in
capacity for no increase in cost.
B
a
h
z
a
d
31. 1/2
3.2 The area of steel, expressed as a percentage of gross concrete area, for the column
of Problem 3.1 is lower than would often be used in practice. Recalculate
the comparisons of Problem 3.1, using f y of 40 ksi and 60 ksi as before, but
for a 16 × 20 in. column reinforced with eight No. 11 (No. 36) bars. Compare
your results with those of Problem 3.1.
20
16
4‐No. 11 (No. 36)
As=12.48in2
4‐No. 11 (No. 36)
As11 1.56in
2
As 8 As11
12.48 in
2
Ag 16in 20
in 320 in
2
Ac Ag As
307.52 in
2
f'c 4000psi
fy 40000psi
fy1 60000psi
Ec 3600000psi
Es 29000000psi
n
Es
Ec
8.1
Part a The solution is identical for grade 40 and grade 60 reinforcement
fc 1200psi
P fc Ac n As
489664 lbf
Ps fc n
As
120640 lbf
Ps
P
0.246
The steel carries 25 percent of the load
Part b
εy
fy
Es
0.00138
εy1
fy1
Es
0.00207
For slow loading fc 3000psi
fc1 3300psi
P1 Ac fc1
As fy1
1763616 lbf
P Ac fc
As fy
1421760 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
748800 lbf
Ps As fy
499200 lbf
Ps1
P1
0.425
Ps
P
0.351
B
a
h
z
a
d
32. 2/2
Problem 3.2
Part c
fc 3400psi
both cases
Pu1 Ac fc
As fy1
1794368 lbf
Pu Ac fc
As fy
1544768 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
748800 lbf
Ps As fy
499200 lbf
Ps1
Pu
0.485
Ps
Pu
0.323
Comments
1. There is no difference at fc = 1200 psi and elastic assumptions are used
2. There is a 16% capacity increase at nominal using Grade 60 reinforcement
3. The higher steel ratio produces a higher overall capacity compared to problem 3.1
B
a
h
z
a
d
57. 1/2
3.1. A 16 × 20 in. column is made of the same concrete and reinforced with the same six No.
9 (No. 29) bars as the column in Examples 3.1 and 3.2, except t hat a steel with yield strength
f y = 40 ksi is used. The stress-strain diagram of this reinforcing steel is shown in Fig. 2.15 for
fy = 40 ksi. For this column determine ( a ) the axial load that will stress the concrete to 1200
psi; ( b ) the load at which the steel starts yielding; ( c ) the maximum load; and ( d ) the share
of the total load carried by the reinforcement at these three stages of loading. Compare results
with those calculated in the examples for f y = 60 ksi, keeping in mind, in regard to relative
economy, that the price per pound for reinforcing steels with 40 and 60 ksi yield points is about
the same.
20
16
As 6.0in
2
Ag 16in 20
in 320 in
2
Ac Ag As
314 in
2
f'c 4000psi
fy 40000psi
fy1 60000psi
Ec 3600000psi
Es 29000000psi
n
Es
Ec
8.1
Part a The solution is identical for grade 40 and grade 60 reinforcement
fc 1200psi
P fc Ac n As
434800 lbf
Ps fc n
As
58000 lbf
Ps
P
0.133
The steel carries 13.3 percent of the load
Part b
εy
fy
Es
0.00138
εy1
fy1
Es
0.00207
For slow loading fc 3000psi
fc1 3300psi
P1 Ac fc1
As fy1
1396200 lbf
P Ac fc
As fy
1182000 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
360000 lbf
Ps As fy
240000 lbf
Ps1
P1
0.258
Ps
P
0.203
B
a
h
z
a
d
58. 2/2
Problem 3.1
Part c
fc 3400psi
Pu1 Ac fc
As fy1
1427600 lbf
Pu Ac fc
As fy
1307600 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
360000 lbf
Ps As fy
240000 lbf
Ps1
Pu
0.275
Ps
Pu
0.184
Comments
1. There is no difference at fc = 1200 psi and elastic assumptions are used
2. As the strain increases, the steel with fy = 60,000 psi contributes more to the total load and
the column has a higher total capacity
3. Grade 40 and Grade 40 have the same cost, therefore Grade 60 provides a 9% increase in
capacity for no increase in cost.
B
a
h
z
a
d
59. 1/2
3.2 The area of steel, expressed as a percentage of gross concrete area, for the column
of Problem 3.1 is lower than would often be used in practice. Recalculate
the comparisons of Problem 3.1, using f y of 40 ksi and 60 ksi as before, but
for a 16 × 20 in. column reinforced with eight No. 11 (No. 36) bars. Compare
your results with those of Problem 3.1.
20
16
4‐No. 11 (No. 36)
As=12.48in2
4‐No. 11 (No. 36)
As11 1.56in
2
As 8 As11
12.48 in
2
Ag 16in 20
in 320 in
2
Ac Ag As
307.52 in
2
f'c 4000psi
fy 40000psi
fy1 60000psi
Ec 3600000psi
Es 29000000psi
n
Es
Ec
8.1
Part a The solution is identical for grade 40 and grade 60 reinforcement
fc 1200psi
P fc Ac n As
489664 lbf
Ps fc n
As
120640 lbf
Ps
P
0.246
The steel carries 25 percent of the load
Part b
εy
fy
Es
0.00138
εy1
fy1
Es
0.00207
For slow loading fc 3000psi
fc1 3300psi
P1 Ac fc1
As fy1
1763616 lbf
P Ac fc
As fy
1421760 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
748800 lbf
Ps As fy
499200 lbf
Ps1
P1
0.425
Ps
P
0.351
B
a
h
z
a
d
60. 2/2
Problem 3.2
Part c
fc 3400psi
both cases
Pu1 Ac fc
As fy1
1794368 lbf
Pu Ac fc
As fy
1544768 lbf
Ps1 As fy1
748800 lbf
Ps As fy
499200 lbf
Ps1
Pu
0.485
Ps
Pu
0.323
Comments
1. There is no difference at fc = 1200 psi and elastic assumptions are used
2. There is a 16% capacity increase at nominal using Grade 60 reinforcement
3. The higher steel ratio produces a higher overall capacity compared to problem 3.1
B
a
h
z
a
d
62. 1/2
3.4. A 20 × 24 in. column is made of the same concrete as used in Examples 3.1
and 3.2. It is reinforced with six No. 11 (No. 36) bars with f y = 60 ksi. For
this column section, determine ( a ) the axial load that the section will carry at
a concrete stress of 1400 psi; ( b ) the load on the section when the steel begins
to yield; ( c ) the maximum load if the section is loaded slowly; and ( d ) the
maximum load if the section is loaded rapidly. The area of one No. 11 (No. 36)
bar is 1.56 in 2 . Determine the percent of the load carried by the steel and the
concrete for each combination.
Reinforcement Areas
Given Properties
f'c 4000psi
fy 60000psi
fc 1400psi
n 8
Es 29000000psi
Column Properties
b 20in
t 24in
Ag b t
480 in
2
Ast 6As11 9.36 in
2
Part (a) Compute the axial capacity of the section loaded below the elastic limit.
Solution: The axial capacity is based on the gross area of the column plus the effective area of
the steel. Since we count the holes where the steel is removed, the additional effective area of
the steel is (n-1)Ast.
Ac Ag Ast
Ag 480 in
2
Ast 9.36 in
2
Ac 471 in
2
P fc Ag n 1
( ) Ast
P 764 kip
Concrete and steel
contribution
Pc fc Ag Ast
Pc 659 kip
100
Pc
P
86.3
Ps fc n
Ast
Ps 105 kip
100
Ps
P
13.7
Part (b): Compute the capacity of the column when the steel begins to yield εy
fy
Es
εy 0.00207
or 2/10 of one percent
Examining Figure 3.3, we are beyond the elastic portion of the concrete stress strain
curve, but we are at the elastic limit of the steel.
fs εy Es
fs 60000 psi
From Figure 3.3 fc 3100psi
for slow loading
Since the problem is nonlinear, we must break out the concrete and
steel areas. We can no longer use the elastic equation.
B
a
h
z
a
d
63. 2/2
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 2021 kip
100
Pc
P
32.6
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1459 kip
Ps fs Ast
100
Ps
P
27.8
Ps 562 kip
Part (c): Compute the maximum load capacity of the section if loaded slowly
Examining Figure 3.3, we are beyond the elastic portion of the concrete stress strain curve
and we are in the plastic range of the steel.
fs fy
fs 60000 psi
From Figure 3.3 fc 3400psi
for slow loading
Since the problem is nonlinear, we must break out the concrete and
steel areas. We can no longer use the elastic equation from 1.1.
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 2162 kip
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1600 kip
100
Pc
P
74
Ps fs Ast
Ps 562 kip
100
Ps
P
26
Part (d): If we reexamine the problem with a fast loading, then the concrete stress would be
fc 4000psi
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 2444 kip
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1883 kip
100
Pc
P
77
Ps fs Ast
Ps 562 kip
100
Ps
P
23
1. As the concrete becomes non-linear, the steel picks up more load, but after the steel
yields, the load goes to the conrete.
2. The slow loading is approximately 88% of the fast load scenario - This is slightly
higher than the 0.85 given in eq. 3.6.
B
a
h
z
a
d
64. 1/3
3.5 A 24 in. diameter column is made of the same concrete as used in Examples
3.1 and 3.2. The area of reinforcement equals 2.1 percent of the gross cross
section (that is, A s = 0.021 A g ) and f y = 60 ksi. For this column section, determine
( a ) the axial load the section will carry at a concrete stress of 1200 psi;
( b ) the load on the section when the steel begins to yield; ( c ) the maximum
load if the section is loaded slowly; ( d ) the maximum load if the section is
loaded rapidly; and ( e ) the maximum load if the reinforcement in the column is
raised to 6.5 percent of the gross cross section and the column is loaded slowly.
Comment on your answer, especially the percent of the load carried by the
steel and the concrete for each combination.
Reinforcement Properties
Given Properties
f'c 4000psi
fy 60000psi
fc 1200psi
n 8
Es 29000000psi
Column Properties
d 24in
Ag π
d
2
4
ρ 0.021
is the reinforcement ratio or the fraction of
the section that is steel
Ast ρ Ag
The total area of steel Ast is Ast 9.5 in
2
Part (a) Compute the axial capacity of the section loaded below the elastic limit.
Solution: The axial capacity is based on the gross area of the column plus the effective area of
the steel. Since we count the holes where the steel is removed, the additional effective area of
the steel is (n-1)Ast.
Ac Ag Ast
Ag 452 in
2
Ast 9.50 in
2
Ac 443 in
2
P fc Ag n 1
( ) Ast
P 623 kip
Concrete and steel
contribution
Pc fc Ag Ast
Pc 531 kip
100
Pc
P
85.4
Ps fc n
Ast
Ps 91 kip
100
Ps
P
14.6
Part (b): Compute the capacity of the column when the steel begins to yield εy
fy
Es
εy 0.00207
or 2/10 of one percent
Examining Figure 1.16, we are beyond the elastic portion of the concrete stress strain
curve, and we are at the elastic limit of the steel.
fs εy Es
fs 60000 psi
From Figure 1.16 fc 3100psi
for slow
loading
B
a
h
z
a
d
65. 2/3
Since the problem is nonlinear, we must break out the concrete and
steel areas. We can no longer use the elastic equation from 1.1.
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 1943 kip
100
Pc
P
27.4
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1373 kip
Ps fs Ast
100
Ps
P
29.3
Ps 570 kip
Part (c): Compute the maximum load capacity of the section if loaded slowly
Examining Figure 1.16, we are beyond the elastic portion of the concrete stress strain curve
and we are in the plastic range of the steel.
fs fy
fs 60000 psi
From Figure 3.3 fc 3400psi
for slow loading
Since the problem is nonlinear, we must break out the concrete and
steel areas. We can no longer use the elastic equation from 1.1.
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 2076 kip
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1506 kip
100
Pc
P
72.5
Ps fs Ast
Ps 570 kip
100
Ps
P
27.5
Part (d): If we reexamine the problem with a fast loading as would occur in a building, then the
concrete stress would be
fc 4000psi
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 2342 kip
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1772 kip
100
Pc
P
75.7
Ps fs Ast
Ps 570 kip
Note: the total increase is in the concrte contribution. 100
Ps
P
24.3
Part (e): Determine the capacity for a slow loaded column with the steel changed to 6.5%
Ast 0.065 Ag
Ast 29.4 in
2
fs fy
fs 60000 psi
From Figure 1.16 fc 3400psi
for slow loading
P fc Ac
fs Ast
P 3270 kip
Pc fc Ac
Pc 1506 kip
100
Pc
P
46
Ps fs Ast
Ps 1764 kip
100
Ps
P
54
B
a
h
z
a
d
66. 3/3
Comments
1. As the concrete becomes non-linear, the steel picks up more load, but after the steel
yields, the load goes to the conrete.
2. The slow loading is approximately 88% of the fast load scenario - This is slightly
higher than the 85 percent given earlier.
B
a
h
z
a
d
68. 4.2 Compare the cracking moment based on the gross section properties and the transformed
section properties with 2‐No. 10 (No. 32) bars in Figure P4.1b based on a concrete tensile capacity of
7.5vf’c.
3 6
1 2 f'c 5000psi
Ec 57000 f'c psi
4.031 10
6
psi
Es 29000000
psi
b 12in
h 36in
Ig
b h
3
12
46656in
4
Mcr
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
h
2
1375 in kip
Reinforcement details
Calculate transformed section properties
n
Es
Ec
7.2
As 2 As10
2.54 in
2
n As
18.3 in
2
ys 2.5in
yb
b h
2
2
n As
ys
b h
n As
17.37in
Ig
b h
3
12
b h
h
2
yb
2
n As
yb ys
2
50869in
4
Mcrt
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
yb
1553 in kip
As
b h
0.0059
Mcrt
Mcr
1.13
Comment:
Including 0.6% reinforcment increased the cracking moment by 13%
B
a
h
z
a
d
69. 4.3 Compare the cracking moment based on the gross section properties and the transformed
section properties with 4‐No. 9 (No. 29) bars in Figure P4.1c based on a concrete tensile capacity of
7.5vf’c.
f'c 6000psi
28
8
8
c) f’c = 6000 psi
Es 29000000psi
b 28in
h 36in
bw 8in
hf 8in
yb
b
hf
2
2
bw h hf
h hf
2
hf
b hf
bw h hf
13.0 in
Ec 57000 f'c psi
4415 ksi
Reinforcement details
Ig
b hf
3
12
bw h hf
3
12
b hf
yb
hf
2
2
bw h hf
h hf
2
hf
yb
2
52117in
4
Mcr
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
yb
2329 in kip
Based on Gross Section
Calculations based on transformed section
n
Es
Ec
6.6
As 4 As9
4.00 in
2
n As
26.3 in
2
ys 2.5in
yb
b
hf
2
2
bw h hf
h hf
2
hf
n As
ys
b hf
bw h hf
n As
12.418in
Igc
b hf
3
12
bw h hf
3
12
b hf
yb
hf
2
2
bw h hf
h hf
2
hf
yb
2
52269in
4
Ig Igc n As
yb ys
2
54853in
4
Ig
Igc
1.049
Reinforcement adds 12% to Ig
Reinforcement adds about
10% to the cracking moment
calculation
Mcrt
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
yb
2566 in kip
Mcrt
Mcr
1.102
B
a
h
z
a
d
70. 4.4 Compare the cracking moment based on the gross section properties and the transformed
section properties with 2‐No. 11 (No. 36) bars in Figure P4.1d based on a concrete tensile capacity
of 7.5vf’c.
3 6
3 6
8
4
d ) f’c = 3 00 0 p si
2 ‐½ ”
typ
Es 29000000psi
f'c 3000psi
Ec 57000 f'c psi
3.122 10
6
psi
b 36in
h 36in
bw 8in
hf 4in
yb
bw
h hf
2
2
b hf
h
hf
2
bw h hf
b hf
22.48 in
Reinforcement details
Ig
bw h hf
3
12
b hf
3
12
bw h hf
yb
h hf
2
2
b hf
h
hf
2
yb
2
51897 in
4
Mcr
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
yb
948 in kip
Calculate transformed section properties
n
Es
Ec
9.3
As 2 As11
3.12 in
2
n As
29 in
2
ys 2.5in
yb
bw
h hf
2
2
b hf
h
hf
2
n As
ys
bw h hf
b hf
n As
21.13 in
Igc
bw h hf
3
12
b hf
3
12
bw h hf
yb
h hf
2
2
b hf
h
hf
2
yb
2
52626 in
4
Ig Igc n As
yb ys
2
62685 in
4
Reinforcement increases the cracking
moment about 30 %.
Mcrt
7.5 f'c psi
Ig
yb
1219 in kip
3.4 Transformed Section
Alternatively you can use the results from the gross section properties instead of working from scratch.
B
a
h
z
a
d
73. 4.7 Determine the service level moment capacity of the section in Figure P4.1b if the allowable
stress for concrete is 0.45 f’c and the allowable stress for the reinforcement is 30,000 psi. Use the
areas of reinforcement from Problem 4.2.
3 6
1 2 f'c 5000psi
Ec 57000 f'c psi
4.031 10
6
psi
Es 29000000psi
b 12in
h 36in
ys 2.5in
d h ys
33.5 in
fc 0.45f'c 2250psi
fs 30000psi
Reinforcement details
Calculate transformed section properties
n
Es
Ec
7.2
As 2 As10
2.54 in
2
n As
18.3 in
2
ys 2.5in
ρ
As
b d
0.00632
k ρ n
( )
2
2 ρ
n
ρ n
0.259
j 1 k
0.741
Msc
1
2
fc k
d
b
d
k d
3
3591 in kip
Mss As fs
d
k d
3
2332 in kip
Ms min Msc Mss
2332 in kip
COMMENT:
The maximimn service load is the minimum moment based on either the concrete stress or the
steel stress. In this example, the steel stress is the governing criteria.
B
a
h
z
a
d
79. 4.13 Determine the required area of reinforcement and the corresponding reinforcement ratio for
the sections in Fig P4.1a if the ultimate moment is a) 10,000 in‐kip and b) 5,000 in‐kip. The
reinforcement yield strength is 60,000 psi.
24“
36
2‐½”
typ
a) f’c = 4000 psi
f'c 4000psi
ϕ 0.90
fy 60000psi
β1 0.85
b 36in
h 24in
ys 2.5in
d h ys
21.5 in
Mu1 10000in kip
Mu2 5000in kip
Reinforcement details
Try: a1 5in
Calculation of As for Mn1
As1
Mu1
ϕ fy
d
a1
2
9.75 in
2
n
As1
As10
7.674
Try 8 No. 10 (No. 32)
bars
Check
As 8 As10
10.16 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
4.98 in
c
a
β1
5.859 in
c
d
0.273
.375 OK
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
10430 in kip
Mu1 10000 in kip
Solution, use 8 No.
10 (No. 32) bars
Calculation of As for Mn2 Try: a1 3in
As2
Mu2
fy d
a1
2
4.17 in
2
n
As2
As11
2.671
Try 3 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
Check As 3 As11
4.68 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
2.29 in
Solution, use 3 No. 11 (No.
36) bars
4-No. 10 also is OK but
less efficient
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
5144 in kip
Mu2 5000 in kip
B
a
h
z
a
d
80. 4.14 . Determine the required area of reinforcement and the corresponding reinforcement
ratio for the section in Fig P4.1 b if the ultimate moment is (a)
7,000 in-kips (b) 3500 in-kips. f y = 60,000 psi.
3 6
1 2 f'c 5000psi
ϕ 0.90
fy 60000psi
β1 0.80
b 12in
h 36in
ys 2.5in
d h ys
33.5 in
Mu1 7000in kip
Mu2 3500in kip
Reinforcement details
Calculation of As for Mn1 Try: a1 7in
As1
Mu1
ϕ fy
d
a1
2
4.32 in
2
n
As1
As11
2.77
Try 3 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
Check
As 3 As11
4.68 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
5.51 in
c
a
β1
0.175m
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
7770 in kip
c
d
0.205
0.375 OK
Mu1 7000in kip
Solution, use 3 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
Calculation of As for Mn2 Try: a1 3in
As2
Mu2
ϕ fy
d
a1
2
2.03 in
2
n
As2
As9
2.025
Try 2 No. 9 (No. 29) bars
Check As 2 As9
2 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
2.35 in
Solution, use 2 No. 9
(No.29) bars and solution
is within 1%
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
3491 in kip
= Mu2 3500in kip
B
a
h
z
a
d
81. 4.15 Determine the required area of reinforcement and the corresponding reinforcement ratio for the
sections in Fig P4.1c if the ultimate moment is a) 10,000 in‐kip, b) 5,000 in‐kip. The reinforcement
yield strength is 60,000 psi.
f'c 6000psi
β1 0.75
28
8
8
c) f’c = 6000 psi
fy 60000psi
ϕ 0.90
b 28in
h 36in
bw 8in
hf 8in
ys 2.5in
β1 0.75
d h ys
33.5 in
Mu1 10000in kip
Mu2 5000in kip
Calculation of As for Mn1 Try: a1 8in
Reinforcement details
As1
Mu1
ϕ fy
d
a1
2
6.28 in
2
n
As1
As10
4.943
Try 5 No. 10 (No. 32)
bars
Check
As 2 As10
3As11
7.22 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c bw
10.62in
c
a
β1
14.2in
c
d
0.423
0.375 must adjust ϕ
εt 0.003
d c
c
0.0041
0.004 OK
ϕ 0.9 0.25
0.005 εt
0.003
0.825
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
10074in kip
Mu1 10000in kip
Solution, use 2 No. 10 (No. 32) plus
3 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
Calculation of As for Mn2 Try: a1 4in
As2
Mu2
ϕ fy
d
a1
2
3.21 in
2
n
As2
As11
2.056
Try 2 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
Check As 2 As11
3.12 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
1.31 in
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
5072 in kip
Mu2 5000in kip
Solution, use 2 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
B
a
h
z
a
d
82. 4.16. Determine the required area of reinforcement and the corresponding reinforcement ratio for the
section in Fig P4.1 d if the ultimate moment is (a) 10,000 in-kips and (b) 5000 in-kips. f y = 60,000
psi. Comment on your solutions.
3 6
3 6
8
4
d ) f’c = 3 00 0 p si
2 ‐½ ”
typ
f'c 3000psi
β1 0.85
fy 60000psi
ϕ 0.90
b 36in
h 36in
bw 8in
hf 4in
ys 2.5in
d h ys
33.5 in
Reinforcement details
SOLUTION
Mu1 10000in kip
Mu2 5000in kip
Assume that the compressin block is in the flange. Let a hf 4 in
As1
Mu1
ϕ fy
d
a
2
5.879in
2
As2
Mu2
ϕ fy
d
a
2
2.939in
2
Try No. 11 (No. 36) bars Try No. 11 (No. 36) bars
n1
As1
As11
3.769
n2
As2
As11
1.884
Use As1 4As11 6.24in
2
Use As2 2As11 3.12in
2
Check assumption Check assumption
a1
As1 fy
0.85f'c b
4.078in
a2
As2 fy
0.85f'c b
2.039in
This is close enought to 4 to be acceptable This is less than 4 OK
c
a1
β1
4.798in
c
d
0.143
0.375 OK
ϕMn2 ϕ As2
fy
d
a2
2
5472 in kip
ϕMn1 ϕ As1
fy
d
a1
2
10601in kip
Mu2 5000in kip
OK
Mu1 10000in kip
OK
B
a
h
z
a
d
83. 1/2
Problem 4.17 A rectangular beam made using concrete with f’c = 6000 psi and steel with fy = 60,000 psi
had a width b = 20 in., and an effective depth of d = 17.5 in and an h =20 in. The Concrete modulus of
rupture fr = 530 psi. The elastic modulus of the steel and concrete are, respectively Ec = 4,030,000 psi
and Es = 29,000,000 psi. The area of steel is four No. 11(No. 36) bars.
(a) Find the maximum service load that can be resisted without stressing the concrete above 0.45 f’c
or the steel above 0.40 fy.
(b) Determine if the beam will show cracking before reaching the service load
(c) Compute the nominal moment capacity of the beam
(d) Compute the ratio of the nominal capacity of the beam to the maximum service level capacity
and compare your findings to the ACI load factors and strength reduction factor.
Reinforcement sizes
Given data
As 4 As11
As 6.24 in
2
Es 29000000psi
b 20in
d 17.5in
h 20in
f'c 6000psi
fy 60000psi
Ec 57000 f'c psi
Ec 4415 ksi
fr 7.5 f'c psi
fr 581 psi
n
Es
Ec
n 6.6
(a) Find the maximum service load that can be resisted without stressing the concrete
above 0.45 f'c or the steel above 0.40 fy.
fc 0.45f'c
fc 2700 psi
fs 0.60fy
fs 36000 psi
ρ
As
b d
ρ 0.018
k ρ n
( )
2
2ρ n
ρ n
k 0.381
j 1
k
3
j 0.873
Moment due to concrete limits
Msc
1
2
fc
b
k
d
d
k d
3
Msc 229 ft kip
Moment due to steel limit
Mss As fs
j
d
Mss 286 ft kip
The maximum service moment is the minimum of the two values.
B
a
h
z
a
d
84. 2/2
Ms min Mss Msc
Ms 229 ft kip
(b) Determine if the beam will show cracking before reaching the service load
Ig
b h
3
12
Ig 13333 in
4
Mcr1
fr Ig
h
2
Mcr1 64.5 ft kip
This is less than the service load so the section cracks. To demonstrate that the transformed
section does not affect this conclusion, the following checks the cracked transformed section.
Δy
n As
d
h
2
n As
b h
Δy 0.697 in
Iut Ig b d
Δy
2
n As
d
h
2
Δy
2
Iut 15400 in
4
Mcr2
fr Iut
h
2
Δy
Mcr2 80.1 ft kip
Mcr2
Mcr1
1.242
(c) Determine the nominal moment capacity of the section.
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
a 3.67 in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
Mn 489 ft kip
(d) Compute the ratio of the nominal capacity of the beam to the maximum service level capacity and
compare your findings to the ACI load factors and strength reduction factor.
Ratio
Mn
Ms
Ratio 2.13
First, the extra calculation of the uncracked transformed area gives only a 18% increase in the
cracking moment. Comparing the cracking moment to the service moment shows that the service
moment is almost 3 time the cracking moment. Therefore, unless the service moment is very
close to the service moment, you can be assured that the section will crack based on the gross
section calculation.
Second, the margin of safety between the service moment and the nominal capacity is 2.11. This
is greater than the ultimate load factors and phi factors from ASCE-7 and ACI (1.6/0.9 =1.78 if the
entire load is classified as live load) indicating that this service level design is more conservative
than LRFD design.
B
a
h
z
a
d
85. 4.18. A rectangular, tension-reinforced beam is to be designed for dead load of 500 lb/ft plus
self-weight and service live load of 1200 lb/ft, with a 22 ft simple span. Material strengths will be fy =
60 ksi and fc・= 3 ksi for steel and concrete, respectively. The total beam depth must not exceed 16
in. Calculate the required beam width and tensile steel requirement, using a reinforcement
ratio of 0.60 ρ0.005 . Use ACI load factors and strength reduction factors. The
effective depth may be assumed to be 2.5 in. less than the total depth.
16
b
2‐½ ”
typ
wd 500plf
f'c 3000psi
β1 0.85
εu 0.003
wl 1200plf
fy 60000psi
L 22ft
SOLUTION
Assume girder dead load and check
assumption at the end of the problem.
wo 500plf
h 16in
Reinforcement details
wu 1.2 wd wo
1.6 wl
3120plf
Calculate the maximum reinforcement ratio
and then 60% of that ratio.
Mu
wu L
2
8
188.8ft kip
ρ005 0.85β1
f'c
fy
εu
εu 0.005
0.014
ρ 0.60ρ005 0.0081
Calculate the resistance factor needed for the reinforcement ratio.
R ρ fy
1 0.588ρ
fy
f'c
441psi
Because ρ is 0.6ρ0.005, it is reasonable to assume ϕ 0.90
bd2
Mu
ϕ R
5.706 10
3
in
3
d h 2.5in
13.5in
Solve for b
b
bd2
d
2
31.309in
Use b = 32 in. and then check assumptions. wo
150 pcf
144
in
2
ft
2
b
d
440.3plf
This is less than assume, OK
As ρ b
d
3.44in
2
Use 3 As10
3.81in
2
b=32 in and d= 16 in.
B
a
h
z
a
d
86. 1/2
Problem 4.19 A rectangular reinforced concrete section has dimension b=14 in., d=25 in, and h =
28 in., and is reinforced with 3 No. 10 (No. 32) bars. The material strengths are f'c = 5000 psi, fy =
60,000 psi.
(a) Find the moment that will produce first cracking at the bottom surface of the section
basing your calculations on Ig, the moment of inertial of the gross section.
(b) Repeat the calculation using Iut, the uncracked transformed moment of inertia.
(c) Determine the maximum moment that can be carried without the concrete stress
exceeding 0.45 f'c or the steel stress exceeding 0.60 fy.
(d) Determine the nominal moment capacity of the section.
(e) Compute the ratio of nominal moment capacity from part (d) to the service level moment
from part (c)
(f) Comment on your results with particular attention to comparing parts (a) and (b) and
comparing part (e) to established load factors.
Reinforcement sizes
Given data
As 3 As10
As 3.81 in
2
Es 29000000psi
b 14in
d 25in
h 28in
f'c 5000psi
fy 60000psi
Ec 57000 f'c psi
Ec 4031 ksi
fr 7.5 f'c psi
fr 530 psi
n
Es
Ec
n 7.2
(a) Find the moment that will produce first cracking at the bottom surface of the section
basing your calculations on Ig, the moment of inertial of the gross section.
Ig
b h
3
12
Ig 25611 in
4
Mcr1
fr Ig
h
2
Mcr1 80.8 ft kip
(b) Repeat the calculation using Iut, the uncracked transformed moment of inertia.
Δy
n As
d
h
2
n As
b h
Δy 0.719 in
Iut Ig b d
Δy
2
n As
d
h
2
Δy
2
Iut 28689 in
4
Mcr2
fr Iut
h
2
Δy
Mcr2 95.5 ft kip
Mcr2
Mcr1
1.181
(c) Determine the maximum moment that can be carried without the concrete stress exceeding
0.45 f'c or the steel stress exceeding 0.60 fy.
fc 0.45f'c
fc 2250 psi
B
a
h
z
a
d
87. 2/2
fs 0.60fy
fs 36000 psi
ρ
As
b d
ρ 0.011
k ρ n
( )
2
2ρ n
ρ n
k 0.325
j 1
k
3
j 0.892
Moment due to concrete limits Moment due to steel limit
Msc
1
2
fc
b
k
d
d
k d
3
Msc 238 ft kip
Mss As fs
j
d
Mss 255 ft kip
The maximum service moment is the minimum of the two values.
Ms min Mss Msc
Ms 238 ft kip
(d) Determine the nominal moment capacity of the section.
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
a 3.84 in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
Mn 440 ft kip
(e) Compute the ratio of nominal moment capacity from part (d) to the service level moment from
part (c)
Ratio
Mn
Ms
Ratio 1.85
0.9 Ratio
1.66
Ratio1
Ms
Mcr1
Ratio1 2.942
(f) Comment on your results with particular attention to comparing parts (a) and (b) and comparing
part (e) to established load factors.
First, the extra calculation of the uncracked transformed area gives an 18% increase in the
cracking moment. Comparing the cracking moment to the service moment, Ratio1, shows that
the service moment is almost 3 time the cracking moment. Therefore, unless the service moment
is very close to the service moment, you can be assured that the section will crack.
Second, the margin of safety between the service moment and the nominal capacity is 1.8, 1.6 if
a factor is included. This is greater than the ultimate load factors from ASCE-7 indicating that
this service level design is more conservative than LRFD design.
B
a
h
z
a
d
88. 1/2
4.20. A singly reinforced rectangular beam is to be designed, with effective depth approximately
1.5 times the width, to carry a service live load of 2000 lb/ft in addition to its own weight, on a 24
ft simple span. The ACI Code load factors are to be applied as usual. With f y = 60,000 psi and fc
= 4000 psi, determine the required concrete dimensions b, d, and h, and steel reinforcing bars ( a )
for ρ = 0.60 ρ 0.005 and ( b ) for ρ = ρ 0.005 . Include a sketch of each cross section drawn to
scale. Allow for No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups. Comment on your results.
Given properties
fy 60000psi
f'c 4000psi
l 24 ft
wl 2000
lbf
ft
wc 150
lbf
ft
3
Estimate beam dimensions for self weight
determination b
d
=
1.5
b
b 12 in
d 18 in
h 21 in
wo b h
wc
wu 1.2 wo
1.6 wl
wu 3.515
kip
ft
Mu wu
l
2
8
Mu 253.1 kip ft
β1 0.85
0.05 f'c 4000 psi
1000 psi
0.85
ρmax 0.85 β1
f'c
fy
0.003
0.003 0.004
0.0206
a) For = 0.6 max, find the section properties to carry
Mu.
ρ 0.6 ρmax
ρ 0.0124
From table R ρ fy
1 0.588
ρ fy
f'c
R 662 psi
Since 0.005, then ϕ 0.90
b
3
Mu
2.25 ϕ
R
13.134 in
d 1.5 b
d 19.7 in
As ρ b
d
As 3.2 in
2
A solution is to use 4-#8 , b= 14, d= 20.5, and h=22.
As 4 0.79
in
2
b 14 in
d 20.5 in
giving a design capacity of
a
As fy
0.85 f'c
b
3.98 in
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
ϕMn 263 ft kip
Mu Mu 253.1 ft kip
OK
B
a
h
z
a
d
89. 2/2
b)
ρ005 0.85 β1
f'c
fy
0.003
0.003 0.005
ρ ρ005
ρ 0.0181
R ρ fy
1 0.588 ρ
fy
f'c
R 911 psi
b
3
Mu
1.5
2
ϕ
R
11.8 in
d 1.5 b
d 17.7 in
As ρ b
d
As 3.78 in
2
This is satisfied by 4-#9 As = 4.0 in2. Beam dimensions would be b= 12, d= 18 and h=21
(or more when two layers of steel are used). The increase in depth accounts for the smaller area of
steel.
Check:
b 12 in
d 18 in
As 4 1.0
in
2
4.0 in
2
a
As fy
0.85 f'c
b
a 5.88 in
ϕMn ϕ As
fy
d
a
2
ϕMn 271.1 ft kip
Mu OK
Comment: While there is a small savings in concrete using solution b, the final selection
of reinforcement can often result in a reinforcement ratio greater than the code allows. In
which case, the solution in a) is preferable.
B
a
h
z
a
d
90. 1/2
4.21 A four span continuous beam of constant rectangular cross‐section is supported
at A, B, C, D, and E. The factored moments resulting from analysis are
At Supports, ft‐kip At midspan ft‐kip
Ma = 138
Mb = 220
Mc = 200
Md = 220
Me = 138
Mab = 158
Mbc = 138
Mcd = 138
Mde = 158
Determine the required final concrete dimensions for this beam using d=1.75 b
and determine the reinforcement requirements at each critical moment section.
Your final reinforcement ratio should not exceed = 0.6 005, fy = 60,000 psi and
f’c = 6000 psi
Reinforcement Details
Given Properties
f'c 6000psi
fy 60000psi
εu 0.003
β1 0.85 0.05
f'c 4000psi
1000psi
0.75
ϕ 0.90
Solution Approach:
Solve the first section using the Resistance Factors. Then, having selected a section, determine
the reinforcement requirements for the remaining sections. Choose reinforcement bars to meet
your criteria.
Mnreqd
220ft kip
ϕ
Mnreqd 244 ft kip
ρ005
0.85 β1
f'c
fy
εu
εu 0.005
0.024
ρ 0.6ρ005 0.014
R ρ fy
1 .588
ρ fy
f'c
R 788 psi
b
3
Mnreqd
1.75
2
R
10.7 in
d 1.75 b
18.7 in
As b d
ρ
2.86 in
2
n
As
As8
3.6
Try the following dimensions and then check the solution
b 10in
h 22in
d h 4in
Additional cover is required because the bars have to be in
two layers, See Table A.7 in text.
As 4 As8
As 3.16 in
2
Note: 3#10 (No. 36) also works and allows the steel to be in one
layer but require more steel.
B
a
h
z
a
d
91. 2/2
a
As fy
0.85 f'c
b
3.72 in
Mn1 As fy
d
a
2
Mn1 255 ft kip
Mn1
Mnreqd
1.04
OK
The next largest moment is 200 ft-kip. This is 10 percent less than the first interior joint so no
adjustment of reinforcement is needed.
The largest positive moment is 158 ft-kip. This is 72 percent of the maximum moment so the steel
requirements will be approximately:
As2 0.72As 2.28 in
2
n2
As2
As8
n2 2.88
use: As 3As8
From Table A.7 use 3-#8 bars in one level
d2 h 2.5in
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
2.79 in
Mnab As fy
d
a
2
197 ft kip
Check total Capacity ϕ Mnab
158ft kip
1.12
OK
Design end negative moment at A and E
As2
138
158
As
2.07 in
2
Use 3#8 As 3As8 2.37 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
2.79 in
Mn2 As fy
d
a
2
Mn2 197 ft kip
Check total Capacity ϕ Mn2
158ft kip
1.12
OK
4#8
In two layers
3-#8 3-#8
3-#8
10
22
B
a
h
z
a
d
92. 1/3
Problem 4.22 A two span continuous beam is supported on three concrete walls spaced 30 ft.
on centers. A service live load of 1.5 kip/ft is to be carried in addition to the self weight of the
beam and is to be applied in a pattern loading. The dimensions of the beam should be
approximately d=2 b, and the reinforcement is to be varied according to the demand. Determine
concrete dimensions at all critical sections but select a constant section for the beam. Allow for
No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups. Use a span to depth ratio of 15 for your first estimate of the depth.
Adjust the depth if the reinforcement ratio is too high. Include sketches drawn to scale. Use f'c
= 6000 psi and fy = 60,000 psi.
Reinforcement Details
Given Properties
f'c 6000psi
fy 60000psi
ϕ 0.90
β1 0.85 0.05
f'c 4000psi
1000psi
0.75
wl 1.5
kip
ft
L 30ft
γc 150pcf
Solution: Begin by estimating a beam depth and width, then compute the girder load.. Compute the
maximum negative moment due to both spans being loaded then the maximum positive moment
with only one span loaded with live load. Try:
h
L
15
24 in
d h 2.5in
21.5 in
b
h
2
12.0 in
wg γc b
h
0.30
kip
ft
wu 1.2wg 1.6wl
2.76
kip
ft
Mneg
wu L
2
8
310 ft kip
By trial estimate a, then compute As for the negative moment over the support, select final As and
check Mn
a 4.0in
As
Mneg
ϕ fy
d
a
2
3.54 in
2
Try 3-#10 As 3 As10
3.81 in
2
a
As fy
0.85 f'c
b
3.74 in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
374 ft kip
ϕ Mn
337 ft kip
OK
c
a
β1
4.98 in
c
d
0.232
3/8 therefore phi = 0.9 is OK
By trial, compute the required As for the positive moment condition.
The maximum positive moment occurs with dead load on both spans and live load on one span
only. The maximum moment for the DL occurs at 3/8L in from the end and the maximum moment
for live load occurs 7/16L in from the end. Conservatively, take the sum of the two conditions and
apply them at the same location.
B
a
h
z
a
d
93. 2/3
Mpos
49 1.6
wl L
2
512
9 1.2
wg
L
2
128
229 ft kip
a 3.0in
As
Mpos
ϕ fy
d
a
2
2.55 in
2
Try 3-#9 As 3 As9
3.00 in
2
a
As fy
0.85 f'c
b
2.94 in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
300 ft kip
ϕ Mn
270 ft kip
OK
c
a
β1
3.92 in
c
d
0.182
3/8 therefore phi = 0.9 is OK
12
24
21.5
21.5
3-#9 (#29)
3-#10 (#32)
Section at midspan Section at interior support
#3 (# 10)
stirrup, typ
B
a
h
z
a
d
95. 1/2
4.23. A rectangular concrete beam of width b = 24 in. is limited by architectural considerations to a
maximum total depth h = 16 in. It must carry a total factored load moment M u = 400 ft-kips. Design
the flexural reinforcement for this member, using compression steel if necessary. Allow 3 in. to the
center of the bars from the compression or tension face of the beam. Material strengths are fy =
60,000 psi and fc''・= 4000 psi. Select reinforcement to provide the needed areas, and show a
sketch of your final design, including provision for No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups.
16
24 2.5 typ. top and
bottom
f'c 4000psi
fy 60000psi
Mu 400kip ft
d 16in 2.5in
13.5 in
d' 3in
b 24in
εu 0.003
Es 29000000psi
β1 0.85
Reinforcement details
SOLUTION
First try a singly reinforced beam with the maximum reinforcement ratio
ρmax 0.0181
for ρ0.005 to assure ϕ 0.90
As ρmax b
d
5.86 in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
4.312 in
c
a
β1
5.07 in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
332.6 kip ft
The capacity is less than the applied load, therefore compression reinforcement must be provided.
From table 4.2 the compression reinforcement will be less than the yield stress.
f's Es εu
c d'
d
13359 psi
M'
Mu
ϕ
Mn
111.8 ft kip
A's
M'
f's d d'
( )
9.57 in
2
Try No. 11 (No. 36) bars n
A's
As11
6.132
Use 7 No. 11 (No. 36) bars
A's 7 As11
10.92 in
2
B
a
h
z
a
d
96. 2/2
Positive Moment reinforcement
Asp As A's
f's
fy
8.296 in
2
Try No. 10 (No. 32) bars n
Asp
As10
6.532
Use 7 No. 10 (No.32) bars.
Because the positive moment steel provided is slightly more than that needed for rho max, check
the net tensile strain and strength reduction factor.
Try
As 7 As10
8.89 in
2
Assume f's 16ksi
a
As A's
f's
fy
fy
0.85f'c b
4.396 in
c
a
β1
5.171 in
Check f's
f's Es εu
c d'
d
13993 psi
OK
εt εu
d c
c
4.832 10
3
0.004 still OK
ϕ 0.9 0.25
0.005 εt
0.001
0.858
ϕMn ϕ fy
As A's
f's
fy
d
a
2
ϕ A's
f's
d d'
( )
422.2 ft kip
This is a classic problem of compression reinforced shallow beams. Finding a combination of positive
and negative reinforcement that still meets the net tensile strain requirement and the nominal moment
capacity by trial is time consuming. The inefficiency of the compression reinforcement is also seen
since more compression reinforcement than tension reinforcement is required.
7‐No. 11 (No. 36)
7‐No. 10 (No. 32)
B
a
h
z
a
d
97. 1/2
Problem 4.24 For the beam with a triangular cross section shown in Figure P4.24,
determine a) the balanced reinforcement ratio and b) the maximum reinforcement ratio if
t =0.005. The dimensions of the triangle are such that the width of the triangle equals
the distance from the apex. The width at the effective width b equals the effective depth
d. Draw the strain distribution, stress distribution, and define your notation.
b
c
d
As strain stress
SOLUTION
a) Find the balanced reinforcement ratio
From Equilibrium
C=T
0.85f’c (1/2 a ba) = Asfy
Substitution As = b d, where b = d and ba = a gives
0.85fc’ a2
/2 = d2
fy
Solve for
2
)
(
'
2
85
.
0
d
a
f
f
y
c
The relationship between a and c is a = 1c. From the relationship of plane
sections remain plane, the correlation of c/d is
t
u
u
d
c
0.85fc’
eu = 0.003
a
d c
As
t fs
C
T
B
a
h
z
a
d
98. 2/2
Substitution for a and then c/d gives
2
2
1 )
(
'
2
85
.
0
t
u
u
y
c
f
f
For the balanced condition, t = y and b is
2
2
1 )
(
'
2
85
.
0
y
u
u
y
c
b
f
f
Using grade 60 steel, so y is 0.002 and u = 0.003, the balanced ratio becomes.
y
c
b
f
f '
153
.
0 2
1
=Solution for balanced ratio
b) Find the reinforcement ratio for t = 0.005.
For t = 0.005 and u = 0.003 the reinforcement ratio is
y
c
f
f '
060
.
0 2
1
005
.
0
=Solution for reinforcement ratio when t = 0.005
B
a
h
z
a
d
99. 4.25. A precast T beam is to be used as a bridge over a small roadway. Concrete dimensions are b =
48 in., b w = 16 in., h f = 5 in., and h = 25 in. The effective depth d = 20 in. Concrete and steel
strengths are 6000 psi and 60,000 psi, respectively. Using approximately one-half the maximum
tensile reinforcement permitted by the ACI Code (select the actual size of bar and number to be used),
determine the design moment capacity of the girder. If the beam is used on a 30 ft simple span, and if
in addition to its own weight it must support railings, curbs, and suspended loads totaling 0.475 kip/ft,
what uniform service live load limit should be posted?
b=48
25
20
5
16
f'c 6000psi
β1 0.75
fy 60000psi
L 30ft
wD 475plf
hf 5in
bw 16in
b 48in
d 20in
Reinforcement details
SOLUTION
Determine the effective width of the flange using 4 bw for an isolated beam
beff min
L
4
4bw
b
48in
Calculate girder self weight
wo
150pcf
144
in
2
ft
2
b hf
bw 20
in
583plf
ρmax 0.0276
From Table A.4
ρ
ρmax
2
0.014
Assume that the compression block remains in the flange, then
As ρ b
d
13.248in
2
Try 8-No. 11 (No. 36) As 8As11 12.48in
2
a
As fy
0.85f'c b
3.059in
less than 5 in hf, so proceed. c
a
β1
4.078in
Mn As fy
d
a
2
13831in kip
c
d
0.204
0.375, therefore
ϕ 0.90
B
a
h
z
a
d
100. Determine capacity and load rating
ϕ Mn
1037 ft kip
Total Capacity
Dead Load
MD
1.2wD L
2
8
64 ft kip
Girder load
Mo
1.2wo L
2
8
79 ft kip
Moment available for live load ML ϕ Mn
MD
Mo
894 ft kip
Live load wL
8ML
1.6 L
2
4969 plf
Post 2.5 tons/ft
w
wL
b
1242 psf
Posted load
B
a
h
z
a
d
105. 0.0040 0.81 0.0206 1013 825
0.0039 0.81 0.0209 1024 826 0.65%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025
M
n
/bd
2
(psi)
Reinforcement ratio,
B
a
h
z
a
d
106. 5.1 A rectangular beam secƟon is 10 in. wide and has a structural depth of 13.5 in. Given that the
concrete strength is 4000 psi and there is no shear reinforcement in the secƟon, determine the
nominal shear capacity allowed by the ACI Code.
≔
b 10 in ≔
d 13.5 in ≔
f'c 4000 psi ≔
λ 1.0
The maximum allowable shear stress for a section without shear reinforcement is 1/2 the regular shear
stress. Thus:
≔
vc =
λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 63.2 psi
≔
Vn =
⋅
⋅
vc b d 8.54 kip
5.2 A rectangular beam secƟon is 14 in. wide and has a structural depth of 20.5 in. Given that the
secƟon has No. 3 (No. 10) sƟrrups at 9 in., a specified concrete strength of 3000 psi, and fyt of 60,000
psi, calculate the factored shear capacity of the secƟon.
≔
b 14 in ≔
d 20.5 in ≔
f'c 3000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.11 in
2
0.22 in
2
≔
s 9 in ≔
ϕ 0.75 ≔
λ 1.0
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 109.5 psi
≔
Vn =
+
⋅
⋅
vc b d ⋅
⋅
Av fyt ―
d
s
61.5 kip
≔
Vu =
⋅
ϕ Vn 46.1 kip
B
a
h
z
a
d
107. 5.3 A rectangular beam secƟon is 16 in. wide and has a structural depth of 26 in. Given that the
secƟon has No. 3 (No. 10) sƟrrups at 12 in., a specified concrete strength of 4000 psi, and fyt of 60,000
psi, calculate the factored shear capacity of the secƟon.
≔
b 16 in ≔
d 26 in ≔
λ 1.0 ≔
f'c 4000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.11 in
2
0.22 in
2
≔
s 13 in ≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 126.5 psi
≔
Vn =
+
⋅
⋅
vc b d ⋅
⋅
Av fyt ―
d
s
79 kip
≔
Vu =
⋅
ϕ Vn 59.3 kip
5.4 A rectangular beam secƟon is 16 in. wide and has a structural depth of 26 in. Given that the secƟon
has No. 4 (No. 13) sƟrrups at 13 in., a specified concrete strength of 4000 psi, and fyt of 60,000 psi,
calculate the factored shear capacity of the secƟon.
≔
b 16 in ≔
d 26 in ≔
f'c 4000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.20 in
2
0.40 in
2
≔
s 13 in ≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 126.5 psi
≔
Vn =
+
⋅
⋅
vc b d ⋅
⋅
Av fyt ―
d
s
100.6 kip
≔
Vu =
⋅
ϕ Vn 75.5 kip
Note: Both problem 5.3 and 5.4 have the maximum allowable spacing of the stirrups equal to
d/2. Going from a No. 3 (No. 10) to a No. 4 (No. 13) stirrup increases the sectional capacity 27
percent but increases the steel area by over 80 percent. It is appropirate to ask the students to
compare the solutions to these two problems.
B
a
h
z
a
d
108. 5.5 A Tsec on shown in Figure P5.5 has a structural depth d = 22 in. a web width bw = 6 in. and a
flange width of bf = 36 in. If the sec on has a specified concrete strength of 5000 psi and No. 3 (No.
10) s rrups at 10 in, determine the factored shear capacity of the sec on.
≔
bw 6 in ≔
d 26 in ≔
λ 1.0 ≔
f'c 4000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.11 in
2
0.22 in
2
≔
s 10 in ≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 126.5 psi
≔
Vn =
+
⋅
⋅
vc bw d ⋅
⋅
Av fyt ―
d
s
54.1 kip
≔
Vu =
⋅
ϕ Vn 40.5 kip
B
a
h
z
a
d
109. 5.6 A rectangular beam secƟon is 16 in. wide and has a structural depth of 26.5 in. Given that the
factored shear on the secƟon is 90 kips, and a specified concrete strength of 4000 psi, determine the
required spacing of No. 4 (No. 13) sƟrrups.
≔
b 16 in ≔
d 26.5 in ≔
λ 1.0 ≔
f'c 4000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.20 in
2
0.40 in
2
≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 126.5 psi ≔
Vc =
⋅
⋅
vc b d 53.6 kip
≔
Vu 90 kip ≔
Vn =
―
Vu
ϕ
120 kip
≔
s =
――――
⋅
⋅
⋅
ϕ Av fyt d
−
Vu ⋅
ϕ Vc
9.58 in
Use s = 9.0 in. s= 9.5 in. is technically correct; however, field installation is typically to the
nearest inch.
B
a
h
z
a
d
110. 5.7 A Tsec on shown in Figure P5.5 has a structural depth d = 24 in. a web width bw = 8 in. and a
flange width of bf = 36 in. If the sec on has a specified concrete strength of 5000 psi and a factored
shear of 50 kips, determine the spacing of No. 3 (No. 10) s rrups.
≔
bw 8 in ≔
d 24 in ≔
λ 1.0 ≔
f'c 5000 psi ≔
fyt 60000 psi
≔
Av =
⋅
2 0.11 in
2
0.22 in
2
≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 141.4 psi ≔
Vc =
⋅
⋅
vc bw d 27.2 kip
≔
Vu 50 kip ≔
Vn =
―
Vu
ϕ
66.7 kip
≔
s =
――――
⋅
⋅
⋅
ϕ Av fyt d
−
Vu ⋅
ϕ Vc
8.017 in
Use s = 8.0 in.
B
a
h
z
a
d
111. 5.8 A simple span rectangular beam has and effec ve length of 18 , a width of 14 in. and a structural
depth of 24 in. It is reinforced with 3 No. 9 (No. 29) bars longitudinally and No. 3 (No. 10) s rrups at
12 in. on center over the en re length. Determine the maximum factored load the beam can carry in
plf. The specified concrete strength is 5000 psi, fy = 60,000 psi, and and fyt = 40,000psi.
≔
b 14 in ≔
d 24 in ≔
l 18 ft ≔
f'c 5000 psi ≔
λ 1.0
≔
As 3.0 in
2
≔
Av ⋅
2 0.11 in
2
≔
fy 60000 psi ≔
fyt 40000 psi
Flexural capacity ≔
ϕ 0.90
≔
a =
――――
⋅
As fy
⋅
0.85 f'c b
3.025 in
≔
Mn =
⋅
⋅
As fy
⎛
⎜
⎝
−
d ―
a
2
⎞
⎟
⎠
⎛
⎝ ⋅
4.048 10
3 ⎞
⎠ ⋅
in kip
≔
wu =
―――
⋅
⋅
8 ϕ Mn
l
2
7.496 ――
kip
ft
Shear Capacity ≔
ϕ 0.75
≔
s 12 in
≔
vc =
⋅
2 λ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
⋅
f'c psi 141.4 psi
≔
Vn =
+
⋅
⋅
vc b d ⋅
⋅
Av fyt ―
d
s
65.1 kip
≔
Vu =
⋅
ϕ Vn 48.8 kip
≔
wu =
―――
2 Vu
−
l 2 d
6.98 ――
kip
ft
The factored load for the beam is 6.98 kip/ft.
Note that the maximum shear can be computed a distance d in from the end of the beam;
hence, the divisior is l - 2d for the shear capacity.
Revising fyt to 60,000 psi results in a flexure critical factored load.
B
a
h
z
a
d
112. 5.9. A beam is to be designed for loads causing a maximum factored shear of
60.0 kips, using concrete with f c = 5000 psi. Proceeding on the basis that the
concrete dimensions will be determined by diagonal tension, select the appropriate
width and effective depth ( a ) for a beam in which no web reinforcement
is to be used, ( b ) for a beam in which only the minimum web reinforcement is
provided, as given by Eq. (5.13), and ( c ) for a beam in which web reinforcement
provides shear strength V s = 2 V c . Follow the ACI Code requirements,
and let d = 2 b in each case. Calculations may be based on the more approximate
value of V c given by Eq. (5.12 d ).
Vu 60kip
f'c 5000psi
fy 60000psi
fyt 60000psi
ϕ 0.75
λ 1.0
vc 2λ f'c psi
141psi
vu ϕ vc
106psi
Reinforcement details
SOLUTION
a) No web reinforcement
Vu=1/2(vu)bwd
bwd
Vu
ϕ f'c psi
1131 in
2
bw = 23.8 in; d=47.6 in
b) minimum web reinforcement
Vu=(vu)bwd
bwd
Vu
vu
566 in
2
bw = 16.8 in; d = 33.6 in
Note, this area could be further reduced if the contribution of the minimum transverse
reinforcement is included.
c) Vs=2Vc
Vu=(vu +2 vu)bwd
bwd
Vu
3vu
189 in
2
bw = 9.7 in; d = 19.4 in
B
a
h
z
a
d
113. 5.10. A rectangular beam having b = 10 in. and d = 17.5 in. spans 15 ft face to face of
simple supports. It is reinforced for flexure with three No. 9 (No. 29) bars that
continue uninterrupted to the ends of the span. It is to carry service dead load
D = 1.27 kips/ft (including self-weight) and service live load L = 3.70 kips/ft,
both uniformly distributed along the span. Design the shear reinforcement,
using No. 3 (No. 10) vertical U stirrups. The more approximate Eq. (5.12 d )
for V c may be used. Material strengths are f c = 4000 psi and f y = 60,000 psi.
l 15ft
d 17.5in
b 10in
L 3.70
kip
ft
D 1.27
kip
ft
λ 1.0
ϕ 0.75
f'c 4000psi
fy 60000psi
fyt 60000psi
Reinforcement details
SOLUTION
wu 1.2 D
1.6 L
7.44
kip
ft
Av 2As3 0.22 in
2
Vu
wu l
2
55.83kip
Vud Vu wu d
44.97kip
Shear at d in from end of beam
Vc 2λ f'c psi
b
d
22.14kip
spacing required at d from end
sd
ϕ Av
fyt
d
Vud ϕ Vc
6.106in
s min 24in sd
d
2
Av fyt
50 psi
b
6.106in
The critical section is at d in from the end,
Use #3 (No. 10) at 6 in.
d
2
8.75 in
Av fyt
50 psi
b
26.4 in
7.5'
Vu 55.8 kip
Vud 45 kip
Vc 16.6 kip
Vc/2 8.3 kip
d
5.27'
6.38'
Stirrups are no longer theoretically
needed at 5.27 in from the end and
may be terminated at vc/2 or 6.38 ft
in from the end.
As a practical design issue,
minimum spacing of 8 in. (based on
d/2) would run through the center
portion of the beam.
B
a
h
z
a
d
127. 6.1 through 6.6 (based on the beam in Fig. 4.15, Example 4.13, fy = 60 ksi)
For the No. 6 bars:
( )
2.5 in.
1.5 0.5 0.75 2 2.375 in.
10 2 1.5 0.5 0.75 2 2 2.625 in.
Use: 2.375 in.
b
b
b
c
c
c
≤
≤ + + =
≤ − + + =
For the No. 9 bars:
( )
2.75 in.
2.5 2 1.25 in.
1.5 0.5 1.128 2 2.564 in.
10 2 1.5 0.5 1.128 2 2 2.436 in.
Use: 1.25 in.
b
b
b
b
c
c
c
c
≤
≤ =
≤ + + =
≤ − + + =
No. 6 bars No. 9 bars
t
ψ 1.3 1.0
e
ψ 1.0 1.0
s
ψ 0.80 1.0
B
a
h
z
a
d
128. 6.1 For the beam cross section shown in Fig. 4.15, what are the development lengths of the top No. 6
bars and bottom No. 9 bars for No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups with 1½ in. clear side cover spaced at 6 in.
using Eq. (6.4) and (6.5). Normalweight concrete, c
f ′ = 4000 psi. Comment.
No. 6 bars: Plane of splitting through side cover, s = 6 in., n = 1, Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.3, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 0.80,
λ = 1.0, b
c = 2.375 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 6 1 1.333
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
2.375 1.333
4.94 2.5
0.75
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.3 1.0 0.8
0.75 22.2 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 2.5
λ 1 4000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.3 1.0
0.75 37.0 in. 12.0 in.
25λ 25 1 4000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
No. 9 bars: Plane of splitting between bars separated vertically with 2½-in. center-to center spacing, s = 6
in., n = 2, and Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.0, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 1.0, λ = 1.0, b
c = 1.25 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 6 2 0.667
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
1.25 0.667
1.7 2.5
1.128
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.128 47.2 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 1.7
λ 1 4000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.0 1.0
1.128 53.5 in. 12.0 in.
20λ 20 1 4000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
Equation (6.4) takes advantage of the actual cover and the presence of the stirrups, resulting in
development lengths that are less than calculated by Eq. (6.5). The values of development length
obtained using the two equations are closer for the No. 9 bars because of the lower values of cb and Ktr
compared to those for the No. 6 bars.
B
a
h
z
a
d
129. 6.2 For the beam cross section shown in Fig. 4.15, what are the development lengths of the top No. 6
bars and bottom No. 9 bars for No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups with 1½ in. clear side cover spaced at 4 in.
using Eq. (6.4) and (6.5). Lightweight concrete, c
f ′ = 4000 psi. Comment.
No. 6 bars: Plane of splitting through side cover, s = 4 in., n = 1, Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.3, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 0.80,
λ = 0.75, b
c = 2.375 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 4 1 2.0
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
2.375 2.0
5.83 2.5
0.75
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.3 1.0 0.8
0.75 29.6 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 2.5
λ 0.75 4000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.3 1.0
0.75 49.3 in. 12.0 in.
25λ 25 0.75 4000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
No. 9 bars: Plane of splitting between bars separated vertically with 2½-in. center-to center spacing, s = 4
in., n = 2, and Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.0, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 1.0, λ = 0.75, b
c = 1.25 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 4 2 1.0
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
1.25 1.0
1.99 2.5
1.128
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.128 53.8 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 1.99
λ 0.75 4000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.0 1.0
1.128 71.3 in. 12.0 in.
20λ 20 0.75 4000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
Equation (6.4) takes advantage of the actual cover and the presence of the stirrups, resulting in
development lengths that are less than calculated by Eq. (6.5). The values of development length
obtained using the two equations are closer for the No. 9 bars because of the lower values of cb and Ktr
compared to those for the No. 6 bars. The relatively higher transverse reinforcement compared to
Problem 6.1 results in a greater difference between the two equations for the No. 9 bars, but not for the
No. 6 bars because the maximum value of Ktr governs for the smaller bars.
B
a
h
z
a
d
130. 6.3 For the beam cross section shown in Fig. 4.15, what are the development lengths of the top No. 6
bars and bottom No. 9 bars for No. 4 (No. 13) stirrups with 1½ in. clear side cover spaced at 6 in.
using Eq. (6.4) and (6.5). Normalweight concrete, c
f ′ = 8000 psi. Comment.
No. 6 bars: Plane of splitting through side cover, s = 6 in., n = 1, Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.3, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 0.80,
λ = 1.0, b
c = 2.375 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 6 1 1.333
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
2.375 1.333
4.94 2.5
0.75
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.3 1.0 0.8
0.75 15.7 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 2.5
λ 1 8000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.3 1.0
0.75 26.1 in. 12.0 in.
25λ 25 1 8000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
No. 9 bars: Plane of splitting between bars separated vertically with 2½-in. center-to center spacing, s = 6
in., n = 2, and Atr = 0.2 in
2
. t
ψ = 1.0, e
ψ = 1.0, s
ψ = 1.0, λ = 1.0, b
c = 1.25 in.
( ) ( )
40 40 0.20 6 2 0.667
tr tr
K A sn
= = × × =
1.25 0.667
1.7 2.5
1.128
b tr
b
c K
d
+ +
= = ≤
Eq. (6.4):
3 3 60,000 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.128 33.4 in. 12.0 in.
40 40 1.7
λ 1 8000
y t e s
d b
b tr
c
b
f
d
c K
f
d
yyy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ + ×
Eq. (6.5):
60,000 1.0 1.0
1.128 37.8 in. 12.0 in.
20λ 20 1 8000
y t e
d b
c
f
d
f
yy
× ×
= = = ≥
′ × ×
Equation (6.4) takes advantage of the actual cover and the presence of the stirrups, resulting in
development lengths that are less than calculated by Eq. (6.5). The values of development length
obtained using the two equations are closer for the No. 9 bars because of the lower values of cb and Ktr
compared to those for the No. 6 bars.
B
a
h
z
a
d