Institutionalizing M&E Capacity Building in Nigerian Universities
1. Institutionalization of M&E
Capacity Strengthening in
Nigeria
Samson Bamidele
Dr. Tunde Kuteyi
End of Phase III Dissemination Meeting
June 18, 2014
2. Objectives
To mentor two universities towards integrating M&E courses
into their long-term MPH programs.
To build the capacity of the nursing departments at each
university in Data Demand and Use for pre-service nurse
training
To sustain Nigerian universities in offering short-term M&E training activities to
respond to the demand for skilled M&E professionals in Nigeria.
3. MEASURE Evaluation Strategy
Introduced core M&E concepts,
development of curriculum
Provided on-going support
Co-facilitated at workshops
Reviewed materials
Webinars, conference calls
Supported cross fertilization of
teams
4. • Session offerings
• Systems to ensure
quality
• Networks to foster
delivery of quality
training
• Financial systems
• Cost analysis
• Marketing
• Vision, mission, clarity
• Leadership capabilities
• Innovation
• Management
capabilities
• Security
• Engagement
of M&E
community
5. Sustainability Assessment/Plans
Each institution developed a
sustainability plan based on findings
With MEASURE Evaluation core
support, we offered:
Facilitation of Leadership Development
Program at ABU
Business planning activity at OAU
Continue to monitor sustainability
assessment plans
6. Key Workshop Results
Completed 12 workshops
since February 2011 (OAU:7,
ABU:5) – 307 participants
Approximately 70% of
applicants male; 30% female
Slightly higher proportion of
female completed the
workshops (37% female)
Difference in female
participants (28% ABU vs 43%
OAU)
Gender break down –
applicants and completed
7. Key Workshop Results
• More than half of
participants came from
government sector
• About 1/3 coming from
NGO sector
• 18% university/other
• 21 international participants,
primarily at OAU
Participant break down by
sector
9. Effects of Workshop
Increased confidence to perform
M&E functions
Increased use of tools and
guidance to support M&E
Cascading training knowledge to
colleagues
Networking opportunities among
participants
In a few instances job promotion,
creation of new M&E units
10. State government representative
“Immediately after the MEASURE Evaluation M&E
course in ABU Zaria, I think it was about a month
later, I was elevated and designated as the State
Health Officer M&E Officer. This is a big responsibility
as I have to supervise M&E of the several Public
Health programs in the ministry. The promotion was a
result of the training I attended at ABU.”
11. NGO representative
“Initially, I was a record officer. After I returned from
the course, a new unit was formed when I discussed
with my organization about the course. …. It wasn’t a
promotion per se. It was a different job but at the
same salary level. It was created after the course at
OAU in Ife when I discussed with my organization
about the vital nature of M&E”
12. Need for additional capacity building
Despite the positive response
to workshops, 82% of those
interviewed admitted they
need additional skills in M&E
Respondents noted barriers in
their work environment that
may inhibit M&E activities
Additional Competencies
Data triangulation
Qualitative methods
Operations research
Statistical analysis
Gaining support for M&E
13. Examples of Built Institutional Capacity
Universities are fully funding workshops through fees
Universities are fully responsible for:
Administrative aspects - including developing marketing
materials, processing applications, fees, logistics, fellowships, and
evaluating workshops
Technical aspects – including developing materials, preparing
facilitators, and incorporating feedback from previous workshops to
improve subsequent workshops.
Networking with M&E professionals - universities draw on a
broad group of facilitators from within their institutions as well as
external experts
14. Pre-Service/other courses
Pre-Service In-Service
2 credit M&E course
•ABU MPH program
•OAU DON (pa) – for BSNc and
Master’s
Advanced Diploma in M&E
(OAU, IPH)
M&E track
•OAU MPH program (pa)
DDU
•ABU DON (embedded into
existing curriculum)
•ABU - pilot testing CHO materials
15. Overall Challenges
Changes in leadership
Approval of M&E track and
longer term courses – slow
process
Security, lecturer strike
Workshop fees
Balancing agenda to
include topics in demand
but not overloading
16. The Way Forward
Develop additional courses for M&E AND program staff
Diversify pre-service courses beyond current institutions
Link students with internship opportunities
Consider affordable options for government
Formalize a community of practice
19. MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S.
Agency for International Development and implemented by the
Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF
Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and
Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government.
MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's
primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and
evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.
Visit us online at http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure
Editor's Notes
Introduced core M&E concepts, curriculum to build capacity - Facilitated curriculum review, supported attendance at regional training partner workshops, conducted ToT,
Co-facilitated at workshops, observed and provided feedback
Reviewed agendas, slides, activities,
Offered cost effective capacity building webinars, conference calls
Supported cross fertilization of teams
This is our sustainability assessment framework which was based on an extensive literature and experience in the field. To achieve sustainability, we examined four key components such as governance leadership and people – such as the vision, mission, and clarity of purpose regarding M&E activities at the institutions; the leadership capabilities – for managing a team in successful implementation of workshops as well as developing innovative courses and solutions, and the management capabilities of the team members to deliver high quality workshops and products.
We also examined the financial management – in terms of the institution’s ability to access grant and fees from the bursary in a timely manner, a cost analysis of workshops to ensure costs do not exceed the fees and what is the “break even” point for the # of participants needed to sustain a workshop, as well as marketing and ensuring demand for workshops and other M&E products.
We assessed technical capacity – the extent to which the institution has the capacity to deliver key sessions such as M&E frameworks, indicators, data quality, data use – and what types of systems have been established to main high quality workshops including the development or exposure to networks to foster the delivery of high quality training.
We also examined the environment to understand how things such as security affects the implementation of workshops and the engagement of the M&E community at large, to make sure that the M&E training content delivered is timely and up to date in the national context. This also links back to demand creation for M&E training and capacity building.
There were a total of 522 applicants, 307 eventually admitted
The government sector was fairly even between OAU and ABU (49% vs 55%) – Of the 159 that were from the government sector, MEASURE supported 60 through Fellowships (38%)
Security played a roll in the number of international candidates – almost none at ABU and the amount at OAU has dropped off over the years
Through the trainings, we have reached individuals in 22 of 36 states and the FCT.
Through in-depth interviews with 50 workshop participants, evidence of…
While we have made important strides through the 2 week M&E course, M&E officers have many more responsibilities than routine monitoring and need additional support for how to analyse the monitoring data they have, as well as employ other data collection and analysis methods for non-routine data collection. Further, the workshop approach is short term and participants return to their places of work, often to colleagues and organizations that don’t have the same new M&E and data use lens -
While we have tracked the success of participants who were involved in the workshop, the primary goal was to build a sustainable model for capacity building. We have made important progress demonstrating that this model can work.
We have worked with the institutions to try to embed the M&E courses into pre-service, as it is with this approach we will see long term changes in M&E skills over time.
Through OAU’s Institute for Public Health they have the mechanism to offer distance based and other in-service trainings, across sectors
For the work with the Department of Nursing Sciences and community health officers, MEASURE Evaluation has supported the pilot testing of materials with students from these departments to identify the core materials that would be the best “fit”
Pa – is pending approval