Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•239 views
This document summarizes an information session about NSERC Discovery Grants. It discusses the new two-step evaluation process, including merit indicators and funding recommendations. It also describes the new conference model for peer review, involving 12 evaluation groups organized by research area. The document provides tips for applying, including eligibility requirements and evaluation criteria like scientific excellence, merit of the proposal, and contributions to training highly qualified personnel.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
PhD Admission PPT
WorldStar Consultants provides PhD admission services and guidance through the 12 levels of the PhD research process in India. They help with entrance exams, university admission, topic selection, guide appointment, synopsis preparation, coursework, publications, seminars, thesis preparation, and final defense. The document outlines each level and the support provided at each stage to help candidates successfully complete their PhD.
Making grey literature count: ERA, impact and other mechanisms for assessing ...
Presentation by Dr Ian McMahon, Director, Research Group of Eight at the Where is the evidence conference, National Library of Australia, Canberra, 10 October 2012.
NIH Faculty Presentation
The document discusses changes being implemented by NIH to enhance the peer review process for grant applications. Key changes include shorter application pages limits for certain grants, restructuring applications to better align with review criteria, and implementing a 9-point scoring system for reviewers. New investigators will see benefits such as special consideration during review and a shortened review cycle for some R01 applications.
Šablona sebeevaluační zprávy
Samostatný doplňující dokument 2 / Pilotní ověření návrhu nové metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizací
ResEval: Resource-oriented Research Impact Evaluation platform
This document proposes a new open and resource-oriented platform for research impact evaluation. It discusses problems with existing solutions like limited data sources and predefined metrics. The proposed solution features a common platform to access various scientific resources, support for personalized metrics, natural language queries, and evaluation of individuals and groups. The architecture defines three layers and prototypes have been implemented for individual/contribution evaluation and group comparison. Future work includes improving the language module and adding more prototype options.
Navigating the K Award Process CTSI K Award Workshop
Navigating the K Award Process CTSI K Award Workshop
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Professor of Medicine and Public Health
Doing your systematic review: managing data and reporting
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Ruaraidh Hill PhD MSc FHEA Lecturer in evidence synthesis at the University of Liverpool and Angela Boland MSc PhD PGCert (LTHE)Director –Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...
This document provides information about the K99/R00 Career Transition Award program from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The K99 phase provides 1-2 years of mentored support for postdoctoral researchers, while the R00 phase provides 1-3 years of independent research support contingent on securing an independent research position. Eligible candidates must have a terminal degree and no more than 4 years of postdoctoral experience. The program aims to support highly motivated researchers in transitioning to independent research careers through a period of mentored research followed by independent funding.
Recommended
PhD Admission PPT
WorldStar Consultants provides PhD admission services and guidance through the 12 levels of the PhD research process in India. They help with entrance exams, university admission, topic selection, guide appointment, synopsis preparation, coursework, publications, seminars, thesis preparation, and final defense. The document outlines each level and the support provided at each stage to help candidates successfully complete their PhD.
Making grey literature count: ERA, impact and other mechanisms for assessing ...
Presentation by Dr Ian McMahon, Director, Research Group of Eight at the Where is the evidence conference, National Library of Australia, Canberra, 10 October 2012.
NIH Faculty Presentation
The document discusses changes being implemented by NIH to enhance the peer review process for grant applications. Key changes include shorter application pages limits for certain grants, restructuring applications to better align with review criteria, and implementing a 9-point scoring system for reviewers. New investigators will see benefits such as special consideration during review and a shortened review cycle for some R01 applications.
Šablona sebeevaluační zprávy
Samostatný doplňující dokument 2 / Pilotní ověření návrhu nové metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizací
ResEval: Resource-oriented Research Impact Evaluation platform
This document proposes a new open and resource-oriented platform for research impact evaluation. It discusses problems with existing solutions like limited data sources and predefined metrics. The proposed solution features a common platform to access various scientific resources, support for personalized metrics, natural language queries, and evaluation of individuals and groups. The architecture defines three layers and prototypes have been implemented for individual/contribution evaluation and group comparison. Future work includes improving the language module and adding more prototype options.
Navigating the K Award Process CTSI K Award Workshop
Navigating the K Award Process CTSI K Award Workshop
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Professor of Medicine and Public Health
Doing your systematic review: managing data and reporting
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Ruaraidh Hill PhD MSc FHEA Lecturer in evidence synthesis at the University of Liverpool and Angela Boland MSc PhD PGCert (LTHE)Director –Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group
Considerations in Applying for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence"...
This document provides information about the K99/R00 Career Transition Award program from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The K99 phase provides 1-2 years of mentored support for postdoctoral researchers, while the R00 phase provides 1-3 years of independent research support contingent on securing an independent research position. Eligible candidates must have a terminal degree and no more than 4 years of postdoctoral experience. The program aims to support highly motivated researchers in transitioning to independent research careers through a period of mentored research followed by independent funding.
Abstract Writing & Oral Presentations 2016
This document discusses abstract preparation and oral presentations. It provides guidance on effectively preparing abstracts, including reviewing study design, ensuring sufficient data and interpretation, tailoring the abstract to the recipient organization, and clearly portraying information. It also offers tips for oral presentations, such as choosing appropriate media, following time limits, preparing effective slides, practicing beforehand, and speaking clearly during the presentation.
Writing the NIH K Award (July 2015)
Writing the NIH K Award
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA
Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
Writing the NIH K Award (2021)
Writing the NIH K Award
Presented by Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA
Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Considerations for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" (July 2015)
Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Director, Brain Research Institute
Getting Ready for the EC-TEL Doctoral Consortium
Doctoral Consortia are very different from your average conference. For the 2019 ECTEL DC we introduce the early stage track for PhD candidates to present their research ideas prior to their initial findings or first publications. This is not without formal requirements. This slidedeck helps students to prepare a position statement for their Ph.D. project in order to get early feedback from the community and raise the quality of their research. The slides focuses on a structured approach to PhD projects in the field of technology enhanced learning.
Report writing
The document discusses effective documentation and presentation of research results. It notes that reports provide a framework for future work, communicate research findings, and establish the strength of results. The structure of reports includes preliminary, background, methodology, findings, and conclusion sections. Effective reporting requires a clear mandate, defined methodology, and clear presentation of representative findings. Graphs and charts should effectively display tabular data. Oral presentations should cover background, findings, and implications, using aids like slides and handouts.
Writing research proposal for funding
Academic success and promotion in medicine largely depends on the quality and quantity of received grants. Grant money brings prestige and notoriety to the writer and his institution. However, writing a grant proposal can be a challenging task especially for the inexperienced researcher. As research budgets are being reduced by many funding agencies and more researches are competing for it, it is becoming increasingly important to be able to write a grant proposal of high quality.
The purpose of this article is to give the reader guidance on how to organize a research proposal in order maximize chances to obtain the desired funding. Key aspects will be highlighted and practical tips emphasized. This article will primarily focus on writing a grant for a clinical study.
Feedback on the draft summary report
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
Doing a systematic review: top tips for progressing your review
Researcher KnowHow session at the University of Liverpool from 15th March 2021 presented by Ruaraidh Hill, Angela Boland, Michelle Maden.
The session provided advice on conducting key activities in a systematic review. It can also provide a ‘top-up’ to the 3 part series of workshops about systematic reviews which ran earlier in the academic session. Suitable for postgraduates and staff planning or doing a systematic review for the first time or who wish to brush up on their knowledge.
It focuses on key steps in doing a systematic review. It offers brief practical advice, showcase tools and share top tips for progressing your review.
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
UCLA CTSI KL2 Resources (2020)
Mitchell Wong, M.D. Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Executive Vice Chair for Research Training in the Department of Medicine.
Director of the CTSI KL2 Program,
Executive co-Director of the UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program,
Co-Director of the UCLA NRSA Primary Care Fellowship
An introduction to Statistical Analysis Plans
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Carrol Gamble, Anna Kearney and Paula Williamson, Department of Health Data Science. University of Liverpool and Trials Methodology Research Partnership.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 25, 2013)
This document provides information about various types of NIH Career Development Awards (CDAs), including K Awards, for individuals seeking to develop independent research careers. It discusses the different K Award mechanisms (K01, K08, K12/KL2, K23, K99/R00), eligibility requirements, expected time commitments, and salary caps. The document also covers topics like applying for and being reviewed for K Awards, including important components like the candidate, mentor, career development plan, research plan, and institutional environment. It provides guidance on the NIH review process and factors like significance, approach, innovation, and environment that are considered. Funding trends for K Awards over time are presented.
Aviation
The document is lyrics to the song "I'm Alive" by an unknown artist. The lyrics describe feeling alive and able to fly when calling out to or being with a lover. They talk about being filled with love, worries dying away, and a spirit that takes flight because they feel alive through good times and hard times with their lover.
Munky Snapshot
Munky is a social media and event photography company based in Sydney and Melbourne. They have over 80,000 members who are primarily aged 18-24. Munky's crew of 40 photographers attend events 5 nights a week to take branded photos that are uploaded to Munky's website. Members can view and share the photos. The photographers also hand out 40,000 cue cards per month to promote the website. Munky is focused on promoting events, venues, and the nightlife scene to their target demographic through photo sharing and social media.
Velasquez
Synergy refers to working together with others instead of alone to achieve more. It is seen everywhere from animal groups to sports teams where combining individual skills produces better results than any one person could alone. Synergy is not about working individually, always thinking you are right, or not accepting differences; it requires celebrating differences, accepting others, and being open-minded to work well together toward a common goal.
Hfl Brochure
Home For Life was created to help seniors and those with disabilities live safely and independently through home modifications and assistive technology. Their solutions include safety modifications to homes, devices for remote patient monitoring, and interactive systems for communication, entertainment, and cognitive stimulation. Home For Life aims to empower clients to age in place while providing peace of mind to families through its specialized services and team of experienced professionals.
Photos1950 1960...
The photos from 1950-1960 capture a transformative decade in American history. They show the post-war optimism and economic boom as the country emerged from World War 2. Lifestyles were changing as more families could afford new technologies like televisions and cars became accessible to the expanding middle class.
Velasquez
Synergy refers to working together with others instead of alone to achieve more. It is seen everywhere from animal groups to sports teams where combining individual skills produces better results than any one person could alone. Synergy is not about working individually, always thinking you are right, or not accepting differences; it requires celebrating differences, accepting others, and being open-minded. When people synergize, groups can accomplish more faster by leveraging everyone's unique skills.
Paramètres X - Extension Long Term Dynamic Memory Effects
Ce papier décrit l\'état de l\'art actuel des paramètres-X et leur prise en compte des effets mémoires des transistors.
Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
This document summarizes an information session about changes to NSERC's Discovery Grants program. It discusses the new two-step evaluation process, conference model of peer review, changes to evaluation groups, tips for preparing strong grant applications, and other program updates from NSERC.
Buyer Appeal- Get the Scoop!
The document discusses providing a Buyer Appeal Assessment to homeowners to help maximize the value of their home. It defines Buyer Appeal as how attractive a home is to potential buyers and explains that greater Buyer Appeal leads to a higher market value. The Buyer Appeal Assessment, called the "SCOOP", evaluates a home's curb appeal, sense of appeal, order, optimal use of space, and polish to determine its Buyer Appeal rating. The assessment identifies improvements that can increase the home's appeal and value when the homeowners are ready to sell.
More Related Content
What's hot
Abstract Writing & Oral Presentations 2016
This document discusses abstract preparation and oral presentations. It provides guidance on effectively preparing abstracts, including reviewing study design, ensuring sufficient data and interpretation, tailoring the abstract to the recipient organization, and clearly portraying information. It also offers tips for oral presentations, such as choosing appropriate media, following time limits, preparing effective slides, practicing beforehand, and speaking clearly during the presentation.
Writing the NIH K Award (July 2015)
Writing the NIH K Award
Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA
Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Director, Clinical Translational Research Center
Associate Dean of Clinical Research
Writing the NIH K Award (2021)
Writing the NIH K Award
Presented by Isidro B. Salusky, MD
Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at UCLA
Chief, Division of Pediatric Nephrology
Considerations for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" (July 2015)
Christopher Evans, PhD
Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA
Director, Brain Research Institute
Getting Ready for the EC-TEL Doctoral Consortium
Doctoral Consortia are very different from your average conference. For the 2019 ECTEL DC we introduce the early stage track for PhD candidates to present their research ideas prior to their initial findings or first publications. This is not without formal requirements. This slidedeck helps students to prepare a position statement for their Ph.D. project in order to get early feedback from the community and raise the quality of their research. The slides focuses on a structured approach to PhD projects in the field of technology enhanced learning.
Report writing
The document discusses effective documentation and presentation of research results. It notes that reports provide a framework for future work, communicate research findings, and establish the strength of results. The structure of reports includes preliminary, background, methodology, findings, and conclusion sections. Effective reporting requires a clear mandate, defined methodology, and clear presentation of representative findings. Graphs and charts should effectively display tabular data. Oral presentations should cover background, findings, and implications, using aids like slides and handouts.
Writing research proposal for funding
Academic success and promotion in medicine largely depends on the quality and quantity of received grants. Grant money brings prestige and notoriety to the writer and his institution. However, writing a grant proposal can be a challenging task especially for the inexperienced researcher. As research budgets are being reduced by many funding agencies and more researches are competing for it, it is becoming increasingly important to be able to write a grant proposal of high quality.
The purpose of this article is to give the reader guidance on how to organize a research proposal in order maximize chances to obtain the desired funding. Key aspects will be highlighted and practical tips emphasized. This article will primarily focus on writing a grant for a clinical study.
Feedback on the draft summary report
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
Doing a systematic review: top tips for progressing your review
Researcher KnowHow session at the University of Liverpool from 15th March 2021 presented by Ruaraidh Hill, Angela Boland, Michelle Maden.
The session provided advice on conducting key activities in a systematic review. It can also provide a ‘top-up’ to the 3 part series of workshops about systematic reviews which ran earlier in the academic session. Suitable for postgraduates and staff planning or doing a systematic review for the first time or who wish to brush up on their knowledge.
It focuses on key steps in doing a systematic review. It offers brief practical advice, showcase tools and share top tips for progressing your review.
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, Research Education, Training and Career Development Program
UCLA CTSI KL2 Resources (2020)
Mitchell Wong, M.D. Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Executive Vice Chair for Research Training in the Department of Medicine.
Director of the CTSI KL2 Program,
Executive co-Director of the UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program,
Co-Director of the UCLA NRSA Primary Care Fellowship
An introduction to Statistical Analysis Plans
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Carrol Gamble, Anna Kearney and Paula Williamson, Department of Health Data Science. University of Liverpool and Trials Methodology Research Partnership.
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 25, 2013)
This document provides information about various types of NIH Career Development Awards (CDAs), including K Awards, for individuals seeking to develop independent research careers. It discusses the different K Award mechanisms (K01, K08, K12/KL2, K23, K99/R00), eligibility requirements, expected time commitments, and salary caps. The document also covers topics like applying for and being reviewed for K Awards, including important components like the candidate, mentor, career development plan, research plan, and institutional environment. It provides guidance on the NIH review process and factors like significance, approach, innovation, and environment that are considered. Funding trends for K Awards over time are presented.
What's hot (13)
Considerations for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" (July 2015)
Considerations for a K99 Award: the NIH "Pathway to Independence" (July 2015)
Doing a systematic review: top tips for progressing your review
Doing a systematic review: top tips for progressing your review
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Carol Mangione, MD, MSPH “Navigating the NIH K Award Process”
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 25, 2013)
Navigating the NIH K Award Process (July 25, 2013)
Viewers also liked
Aviation
The document is lyrics to the song "I'm Alive" by an unknown artist. The lyrics describe feeling alive and able to fly when calling out to or being with a lover. They talk about being filled with love, worries dying away, and a spirit that takes flight because they feel alive through good times and hard times with their lover.
Munky Snapshot
Munky is a social media and event photography company based in Sydney and Melbourne. They have over 80,000 members who are primarily aged 18-24. Munky's crew of 40 photographers attend events 5 nights a week to take branded photos that are uploaded to Munky's website. Members can view and share the photos. The photographers also hand out 40,000 cue cards per month to promote the website. Munky is focused on promoting events, venues, and the nightlife scene to their target demographic through photo sharing and social media.
Velasquez
Synergy refers to working together with others instead of alone to achieve more. It is seen everywhere from animal groups to sports teams where combining individual skills produces better results than any one person could alone. Synergy is not about working individually, always thinking you are right, or not accepting differences; it requires celebrating differences, accepting others, and being open-minded to work well together toward a common goal.
Hfl Brochure
Home For Life was created to help seniors and those with disabilities live safely and independently through home modifications and assistive technology. Their solutions include safety modifications to homes, devices for remote patient monitoring, and interactive systems for communication, entertainment, and cognitive stimulation. Home For Life aims to empower clients to age in place while providing peace of mind to families through its specialized services and team of experienced professionals.
Photos1950 1960...
The photos from 1950-1960 capture a transformative decade in American history. They show the post-war optimism and economic boom as the country emerged from World War 2. Lifestyles were changing as more families could afford new technologies like televisions and cars became accessible to the expanding middle class.
Velasquez
Synergy refers to working together with others instead of alone to achieve more. It is seen everywhere from animal groups to sports teams where combining individual skills produces better results than any one person could alone. Synergy is not about working individually, always thinking you are right, or not accepting differences; it requires celebrating differences, accepting others, and being open-minded. When people synergize, groups can accomplish more faster by leveraging everyone's unique skills.
Paramètres X - Extension Long Term Dynamic Memory Effects
Ce papier décrit l\'état de l\'art actuel des paramètres-X et leur prise en compte des effets mémoires des transistors.
Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
This document summarizes an information session about changes to NSERC's Discovery Grants program. It discusses the new two-step evaluation process, conference model of peer review, changes to evaluation groups, tips for preparing strong grant applications, and other program updates from NSERC.
Buyer Appeal- Get the Scoop!
The document discusses providing a Buyer Appeal Assessment to homeowners to help maximize the value of their home. It defines Buyer Appeal as how attractive a home is to potential buyers and explains that greater Buyer Appeal leads to a higher market value. The Buyer Appeal Assessment, called the "SCOOP", evaluates a home's curb appeal, sense of appeal, order, optimal use of space, and polish to determine its Buyer Appeal rating. The assessment identifies improvements that can increase the home's appeal and value when the homeowners are ready to sell.
Take a hike...
This document discusses a group of people dressed casually embarking on an extreme hiking trail, as evidenced by the warnings about holding the railing, passing others carefully on the narrow path, and using toe holds on steep steps. It builds intrigue around whether the extreme and dangerous-seeming hike would be daring to attempt, concluding by questioning if it would even be worth it without beer at the summit.
Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
This document summarizes an information session about changes to NSERC's Discovery Grants program. It discusses the new two-step evaluation process, conference model of peer review, changes to evaluation groups, and tips for preparing a strong grant application. Evaluation will continue to assess research excellence, proposal merit, and contributions to training highly qualified personnel (HQP).
Canada quebec-city
Quebec City is the capital of the Canadian province of Quebec. It was founded in 1608 by Samuel de Champlain and is one of the oldest European settlements in North America. Quebec City has served as a capital throughout its over 400 year history, first as the capital of New France and later as the capital of Lower Canada and the Province of Quebec. Today it has a population of around 491,000 people.
From moscow to beijing by train
El documento habla sobre la importancia de la privacidad y la seguridad en Internet. Explica que los usuarios deben tomar medidas para proteger su información personal como usar contraseñas seguras y software antivirus actualizado. También menciona que las empresas deben ser transparentes sobre cómo usan y comparten los datos de los usuarios.
Velasquez
Synergy refers to working together with others instead of alone to achieve more. It is seen everywhere from animal groups to sports teams where combining individual skills produces better results than any one person could alone. Synergy is not about working individually, always thinking you are right, or not accepting differences; it requires celebrating differences, accepting others, and being open-minded. When people synergize, groups can accomplish more faster by leveraging everyone's unique skills.
SAP ByD Brochure
The document introduces SAP Business ByDesign, an on-demand business solution for mid-sized companies. It provides a complete and integrated solution across key business areas like finance, HR, sales, and marketing. The solution allows users to gain visibility and control over all business operations. It is also adaptable to changing business needs with automated software updates and minimal IT support required.
Viewers also liked (17)
Paramètres X - Extension Long Term Dynamic Memory Effects
Paramètres X - Extension Long Term Dynamic Memory Effects
Similar to Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
2013 NSERC Discovery Grant Workshop
The document provides information about eligibility and the application process for NSERC Discovery Grants. It outlines who is eligible to apply, including faculty requirements. It also describes the review process, which involves external peer review, merit assessment by evaluation groups, and funding recommendations. The document provides tips for completing key parts of the application, such as the CCV, research proposal, budget, and relationship to other support. It aims to help applicants understand the requirements and successfully navigate the application process.
Assessment 4 ethics approval form.docx applic
This document is an application for ethics approval of a proposed research project. It includes sections for the student's details, supervisor's details, proposed research topic and methodology, participant selection methods, and plans for ensuring privacy, confidentiality and secure data storage. The student must address ethics around obtaining informed consent from participants, minimizing any risks of harm, and obtaining approval before conducting the research.
Graduate Student Awards: How to apply successfully
Graduate Student Awards: How to apply successfullyGraduate and Postdoctoral Studies - University of British Columbia (UBC)
This document provides an overview of the graduate scholarship funding application process at UBC. It describes the various funding agencies (CIHR, NSERC, SSHRC, affiliated fellowships), eligibility requirements including academic standing, citizenship, research area and months of study. It outlines the application materials required, including the application form, CV, research proposal, transcripts and reference letters. Selection criteria are discussed as well as tips for the application components and general advice. Contact information is provided for questions.PRAB: R Vanderslice 10 24 08
The document discusses the Program Review Advisory Board (PRAB) and the program review process for Cameron University. It provides details on PRAB responsibilities, compensation, the review process, affiliated and non-affiliated program areas, assessment requirements, and the recognition report. The review process evaluates program alignment with standards, candidate performance data, and use of data for improvement.
BCS Academic Accreditation Briefing 2
This document summarizes the academic accreditation process for computing programs at institutions. It covers:
- The people and committees involved in accreditation
- The accreditation submission process, including what to include and how panels evaluate it
- Typical visits, which involve meetings with students, faculty, and touring facilities
- Possible outcomes and next steps after a visit
- Common problem areas found in submissions and during visits
The goal is to provide guidance on meeting accreditation standards and obtaining accreditation for qualifying computing degree programs.
Teac powerpoint 1
- The document discusses the accreditation process of the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC).
- TEAC aims to provide public assurance that graduates of education programs are competent, qualified, and caring teachers based on evidence from the programs.
- Programs seeking TEAC accreditation must provide evidence that graduates have acquired the necessary knowledge and skills and that the faculty effectively monitors and improves the quality of the program.
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subje
Assessment Information
Subject Code: BUS606
Subject Name: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Assessment Title: Assessment 3 – Final Research Proposal and Literature
Review
Weighting: 40 %
Total Marks:
Length:
40
3000 (not including reference list)
Due Date: Submission due Week 12 – Sunday at 11.59 pm
COURSE: Master of Business (Research)
Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Code: BUS606
Type of
Assessment:
Assessment 3 – Final Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Learning
Outcomes
addressed:
(a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to initiate and prepare an
original research proposal.
(b) Demonstrate an advanced ability to prepare a literature
review based on the support of an original research
proposal.
(c) Demonstrate a critical appreciation of the ethical issues
associated with an original research proposal and their
implications for the research and for the acceptability of the
research by an ethics review committee.
(d) Critically evaluate the coherence, relevance and
methodological merits of a given body of literature.
(e) Demonstrate a critical understanding of the theoretical,
practical and professional contexts and significance of the
research.
(f) Prepare a literature review that identifies and discriminates
between concepts, issues, key findings and relevant
theories most pertinent to the research proposal which the
review supports.
Criteria for
Assessment:
Knowledge and Understanding
Content and exploration of theories and ideas
Analysis, synthesis and critical engagement
Technical skills and referencing
Assessment Task:
In this task, you will develop a research proposal for a research
project addressing Leadership and Management issues that is
aligned to one of the Research Clusters in the School of Business.
This research proposal will be used to allocate your Research
Supervisors who will be appointed to supervisor your Master of
Business Research thesis and will also be reviewed by the
Research Committee to complete your Confirmation of Candidature
requirements.
Drawing on your synthesis of the existing research literature in
business and allied fields, you will identify a research question
based on the theoretical, professional, or organizational 'gap' for a
business problem that your proposed research will address. You will
analyze the implications of various theoretical approaches in order
to choose and develop an appropriate theoretical framework for
your research. You will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of
various methodological approaches before choosing and justifying a
preferred methodology for your research.
You research proposal and literature review should comprise the
following sections:
Research Project Title: A working title for the Master of Business
Research thesis that is no more than 12 words
Research Cluster: Identify ...
Developing Research Proposal
This document provides an overview of developing a research topic and proposal. It discusses determining a clearly defined research topic that highlights a problem. Important considerations for a research topic include being of interest, significant, researchable, feasible, practical, and focused. A theoretical or conceptual framework related to the topic should be developed. The proposal should convince reviewers that the project is viable. Key elements of a research proposal are discussed such as the problem statement, objectives, methodology, scope, rationale, and limitations. Guidelines are provided for formatting the research topic, proposal, and report.
PhD Prospectus ChecklistThe following checklist, like the PhD Pr.docx
PhD Prospectus Checklist
The following checklist, like the PhD Prospectus Guide, provides guidance to support prospectus development. Included are the basic expectations for the content of the prospectus from the annotated outline in the Guide. Please refer to the Guide for additional information on how the prospectus will be submitted and evaluated. The PhD Prospectus Rubric standards and a Site-Naming Self-Check are included at the end of this checklist. Not all checklist items may be relevant to your particular study; please consult with your chair for guidance.
· Instructions for students:
· Indicate on the checklist the page number where each heading is located.
· Respond to comments from the committee in each comment history box. Do not delete previous comments—just add your response in the appropriate space.
· Upload this checklist into Taskstream with your prospectus document for each prospectus review.
· Instructions for the chair, second committee member, and Program Director Designee:
· Provide specific feedback in the comment history column. Do not delete previous comments—just add your response in the appropriate space.
· If you made detailed comments are included on the prospectus draft (using track changes and comments), you can refer to the draft rather than restate comments in the checklist; upload both documents into Taskstream during rubric completion.
· Committee chairs should indicate their acceptance of each item by checking the appropriate checkbox by each checklist item.
Date: (click here and type today’s date )
Student’s Name:
Student ID:
School: (click here and pull down to select school name )
Committee Chairperson:
Second Committee Member:
PhD Program Director/Designee:
Prospectus Checklist
Checklist Items
Page #
Comment History
Title Page
Present your Title –12 words or fewer; include topic, variables and relationship between them, and most critical key words.
Chair comments: (click here)
Second Member comments: (click here)
Student comments: (click here)
☐Chair accepts items as complete.
Include your name, program of study (specialization if applicable) and Student ID. Use the PhD Prospectus Template.
Problem Statement
State the problem by presenting a logical argument for the need to address an identified gap in the research literature. Must be relevant to your discipline (program of study).
Chair comments: (click here)
Second Member comments: (click here)
Student comments: (click here)
☐Chair accepts items as complete.
Provide evidence from scholarly sources that the problem is current, relevant, and significant to your discipline (3-5 key citations).
Purpose
Present a concise statement that serves as the connection between the problem being addressed and the focus of your study (1 paragraph).
Chair comments: (click here)
Second Member comments: (click here)
Student comments: (click here)
☐Chair accepts items as complete.
Clarify the metho ...
Assessment Information Subject Code BUS606 Subjec
Assessment Information
Subject Code: BUS606
Subject Name: Business Research Proposal Topic Selection, Justification and
Presentation
Assessment Title: Assessment 1 – Individual Presentation
Weighting: 15 %
Total Marks:
Length:
15
Minimum of 10 slides (+- 10%)
Due Date: Submission due Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pm
COURSE: Master of Business (Research)
Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Code: BUS606
Type of
Assessment:
Assessment 1 – Individual Presentation
Unit Learning
Outcomes
addressed:
(a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to identify, assimilate,
and review applications of, particular research techniques.
(b) Identify various means of data collection that are feasible
and can be ethically enacted.
(c) Articulate and critically evaluate differences between
alternative research methodologies.
(d) Explain how research outcomes may be affected by the
nature and application of particular research techniques.
(e) Demonstrate an advanced ability to construct a robust
methodology for addressing a research question.
(f) Explain how the use of selected methodologies is relevant
to a specific research proposal.
Criteria for
Assessment:
Understanding of the proposed project
Evidence of analysis
Organisation and use of visual aids
Non-verbal & verbal communication skills
Assessment Task:
Students are to select their proposed research topic for the Master
of Business Research thesis and make a presentation to the class
for at least 10 minutes followed by question and answer. The
presentation is required to use PowerPoint slides.
Submission Date:
Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pm (online submission) of the
PowerPoint presentation slide deck.
Total Mark &
Weighting:
15 marks | 15%
Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved
extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per calendar
day,
calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty
per calendar day.
Assessment 1– Individual Presentation. Presentations will be made during the
scheduled class time.
Assessment Description
Students are required to select a proposed research topic for their Master of Business
Research thesis that is aligned to one of the seven Research Clusters in the School of
Business as listed below. Students are required to make a presentation for 10 minutes to the
class on their proposed research topic and answer questions from the class and the lecturer.
Students must conduct extensive research on the topic and must cite relevant sources to
support their research proposal.
The MBR Research Clusters are:
Cluster 1: Leadership and Management of Large Corporations
Cluster 2: Leadership and Management of Not-for Profit Organisations
Cluster 3: Leadership and Management of Start-ups, SMEs and Family Business
Cluster 4: ...
NSERC Strategic Projects Grants Overview
This document summarizes a presentation about the Strategic Project Grants Program competition run by NSERC. There are four target areas for funding: Information and Communications Technologies, Environmental Science and Technologies, Manufacturing, and Natural Resources and Energy. Projects must have at least one non-academic supporting organization from industry or government. The application process was outlined, including requirements for research proposals and letters of support. Projects are evaluated based on seven criteria and only the highest scoring proposals are funded.
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
This document summarizes information from a presentation about the Strategic Project Grants Program run by NSERC. It outlines the program's objectives to fund targeted research areas, application requirements including having support from non-academic partners, and evaluation criteria focusing on research quality, benefits to Canada, and partner interactions. Key details include four new targeted research areas, a maximum budget of $150,000 for equipment, and evaluation involving external referees and a selection committee.
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
This document summarizes information presented about the Strategic Project Grants Program competition run by NSERC. It outlines the program objectives, evaluation criteria, application process and timelines. The program aims to fund collaborative research projects between academia and industry/government partners that address targeted areas like ICT, manufacturing and energy. Projects are evaluated on criteria like originality, quality, interactions with partners and benefits to Canada. The deadline for the 2011 competition was April 15th.
Research proposal
The document provides guidance on writing an effective research proposal. It discusses key factors to consider such as having a significant research problem or idea, clearly describing the problem or idea, and aligning with funding priorities. It outlines important sections to include such as objectives, methodology, timeline, budget, and qualifications. Factors that proposals cannot control like agency politics and competition are noted. The document emphasizes that proposals should be carefully researched, planned, and executed to maximize quality and chance of funding.
Program & Proposal Development
This document provides advice and suggestions for developing successful long-term basic research programs that are aligned with funding program managers' priorities and interests. It recommends determining if your research vision matches the program manager's, participating in relevant workshops, volunteering to review proposals, developing a strategic long-term plan, and starting discussions with program managers well in advance of proposal deadlines. The document also outlines the white paper and proposal review processes.
Research Proposal
The document provides guidance on drafting a research proposal. It discusses the key elements of a research proposal including an introduction, literature review, methodology, expected results, budget, and bibliography. It emphasizes that a proposal establishes the researcher's plan of action and investigation and justifies the need for the study. A good proposal convinces readers that the proposed research is important and the methodology is sound.
Paper 5: Study of the Model and Methodology for Institute Evaluation (Yang)
The document summarizes a three-level evaluation model used to evaluate research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The model includes annual quantitative and qualitative monitoring of common indicators at the bottom level. The second level uses key indicators and benchmarks tailored to different categories of institutes. The top level involves qualitative expert review and advisory committees for each institute. The goal is to develop a quality-oriented, comprehensive evaluation system that emphasizes differences between institute categories and individual institute characteristics. Some open discussions are raised around institute classification, determining key indicators and benchmarks, and aligning CAS management with the new evaluation approach.
Resarch Proposal
The document outlines the key components and structure of a research proposal. It discusses the purpose of a research proposal, which is to present the research question and importance, discuss previous related work, and suggest necessary data. It then describes the typical sections included in a research proposal, such as the executive summary, problem statement, research objectives, literature review, research design, data analysis, qualifications, budget, and schedule. The document emphasizes that the proposal allows the researcher to plan the project and serves as a guide throughout the investigation.
Ch03 research plan
This chapter discusses preparing and evaluating research plans for quantitative and qualitative research. For quantitative research plans, it describes the key components - introduction, method, data analysis, and timeline/budget. The introduction includes the topic, literature review, and hypotheses. The method section outlines the participants, instruments, design, procedures, and data analysis. Qualitative research plans are more emergent and flexible in their design. They include components like the title, introduction with purpose and research questions, and procedures for conducting the study. Both types of plans should justify the research problem and present detailed, well-thought out steps to guide the study.
Writing-Action-Research.pptx
This document outlines the topics and time allotments for a workshop on research in basic education. It includes an introduction to the legal bases of educational research, action research methodology, and APA citation style. The workshop consists of 4 workshops that guide participants through the research process, from problem identification to conceptualizing an intervention. It also includes presentations and feedback sessions. Additional sections provide overviews of relevant DepEd policies and guidelines regarding educational research, as well as the principles of conducting ethical and rigorous research.
Similar to Info Session English Handouts Waterloo (20)
Graduate Student Awards: How to apply successfully
Graduate Student Awards: How to apply successfully
PhD Prospectus ChecklistThe following checklist, like the PhD Pr.docx
PhD Prospectus ChecklistThe following checklist, like the PhD Pr.docx
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
Proposal Preparation - NSERC Strategic Projects: Katie Wallace
Paper 5: Study of the Model and Methodology for Institute Evaluation (Yang)
Paper 5: Study of the Model and Methodology for Institute Evaluation (Yang)
Recently uploaded
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Revolutionizing Application Development
with AI-powered low-code, presentation by George Aspiotis, Sr. Partner Development Manager, Microsoft
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the irresponsible use of machine intelligence in May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the Elixir programming ecosystem in May 2024
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
ここ3000字までしか入らないけどタイトルの方がたくさん文字入ると思います。
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Recently uploaded (20)
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Info Session English Handouts Waterloo
- 2. NSERC University Information Session University of Waterloo Catherine Burns, Industrial Engineering University of Waterloo Jennifer Bean, NSERC Judie Foster, NSERC September 3, 2009, Davis 1302
- 12. How Does the Conference Model Work? EVALUATION GROUP A Group Chair ~ 30 members Four Stream Chairs EVALUATION GROUP B Group Chair ~35 members Four Stream Chairs EVALUATION GROUP C Group Chair ~25 members Three Stream Chairs Section A1-2 Research Topics A2 and A4 Section A2 Research Topic A3 Section A1-1 Research Topic A1 Section A3-1 Research Topic A5 Section A3-2 Research Topic A6 Section A4-1 Research Topics A7 and A8 Section A4-2 Research Topics A9 and B5 Section B1-2 Research Topics B2 and A10 Section B1-1 Research Topic B1 Section B2 Research Topic B3 Section B3-1 Research Topic B4 Section B3-2 Research Topics B1 and B5 Section B4-2 Research Topics B7 and C6 Section B4-1 Research Topics B2 and B6 Section C1-2 Research Topic C2 Section C1-1 Research Topics C1 and B5 Section C2 Research Topic C3 Section C3-1 Research Topic C4 Section C3-2 Research Topics C5 and A5
- 13. Sections = Units Related by Subject Matter and Member Expertise A4 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A3 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword Section A2-1 Section A3-1 A16 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A15 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Section A2-2 A12 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A6 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A9 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A10 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A11 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword A13 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A1 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A5 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A8 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword A2 Research Topic Keywords Subject areas Something else Keyword Buzzword Section A1 Section A3-3 Section A3-2
- 14. Ex: Evaluation Group A Conference Day 1 Section A2-1 Section A3-1 Section A2-2 Section A1 cont’d Section A1 Morning session Afternoon session Section A3-3 Section A3-2 Stream
- 16. Implementation of the Conference Model and the Rating Indicators Chair P.O. 1 st Internal Reader Reader Reader 2 nd Internal Excellence Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Very Strong Conflicts? Merit Outstanding Very Strong Very Strong Very Strong Very Strong HQP Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Very Strong Very Strong COR Factor: N N N N N
- 17. Applying to the Discovery Grants Program
- 21. Life Cycle of a DG Application August 1 Submission of Form 180 Mid-September Assignment to Evaluation Group and Referees November 1 Submission of Grant Application Mid-November Mail-out to External Referees Early-December Group Members receive applications February Grants Competition March – April Announcement of Results
- 22. Evaluation of Discovery Grant Applications Catherine Burns Industrial Engineering
- 28. Reporting HQP Name Type of HQP Training and Status Years Supervised or Co-supervised Title of Project or Thesis Present Position Consent Received from Marie Roy Roy, Marie Masters (completed) Supervised 2003-2005 Research Isotope geochemistry in petroleum engineering V-P (research), Earth Analytics Inc., Calgary, AB Consent Not Obtained from Marie Roy (name withheld) Masters (completed) Supervised 2003-2005 Course Isotope geochemistry Research executive in petroleum industry – Western Canada
- 38. NSERC Contacts Evaluation Group (EG) Program Officer [email_address] Deadlines, Acknowledgement of Applications, Results Your university Research Grants Officer (RGO) Your Account, Grants in Aid of Research Statement of Account (Form 300) Your university Business Officer (BO) NSERC Web site www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca Discovery Grants (including eligibility) [email_address] 613-995-5829 Use of Grant Funds [email_address] On-line help [email_address]
- 40. News from the Research Grants Office
- 46. NSERC Budget 2009-10(millions of $) Total : $1,054
- 47. Discovery Programs Budget 2009-10 (millions of $) Total : $402.6
Editor's Notes
- The history of the DG program budget can be found on the NSERC web site under HOME/NSERC/CONSULTATIONS/, at http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/_doc/Reports-Rapports/Consultations/GSCStructure/NSERCDiscoveryGrantsProgram_e.pdf