2. Inference:
Well, for the Q1 goal we have a
considerable GAP.
Brazil had a very solid
performance, overachieving the
goal, Colombia was a little behind
and Mexico was far behind. As
those entities represent most of
the goal, we have this GAP. Also,
we had Peru as a entity breaking
through limits and presenting a
good GIP result.
Still a LOT to do for Q2, mainly
for the top 3 entities.
3.
4. Not a very good month for iGIP.
As Mexico pushed the result for last month and had a very good
performance last year in May, we are facing a GAP in RA. But
we also have entities showing great results, as Peru and mainly
Panama with an impressive result.
For MA, we have Chile, Guatemala, Mexico and Panama
pushing a small growth but we still need the top 2 entities (Brazil
and Colombia) to have a good end of the month for us to have a
significant growth.
5. Inference:
Our marketing goal is very low, and
considering the history of the region it
makes sense.
Anyway, we actually overachieved our
Q1 goal as Mexico and Brazil over
performed.
Our goal for Q2 is a little more difficult
as Colombia will try to sell the product
and presents a high goal (as Brazil,
Chile and Costa Rica) so, despite
Brazil, most of those entities are still
behind on sales. If you guys are facing
any difficulty, just contact me and we
can see how we can help you.
6. Inference:
For teaching the situation is not that
easy as marketing is for us.
In Q1 we still have a bottleneck of about
50 RE as mainly Mexico could not
perform what they were expecting.
For Q2 we are very behind the goal, but
we know we are starting the teaching
peak. Even though, the current matches
are not enough.
Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru have
a lot to work on. Is the problem still
supply? Please communicate with us!
7. Overall we had a good Q1 in GIP, but Q2 we are facing a lot of difficulties.
It is clear that Marketing is not a focus for us, but still we are behind on
Teaching considering we are almost at the realization peak and the number of
forms matched are very little.
I really advice for the entities with a huge goal on teaching to inform what is
happening this way we can help you.
Also, most of entities still with no goal in iGIP and I really advice you to see
what is happening in Peru. Peru is an entity with no iGIP tradition and at the
moment they decided that they want to change that, that is what they are doing.
We need more entities like Peru! If you still want to change your GIP reality,
please talk to us, we will help it to be a reality, but we need all together to
change it and to achieve 2015.
8. Inference:
Not a bad Q1 for our oGIP as
most of entities achieved or
almost achieved their goal. The
GAP was mainly because of
Brazil couldn’t achieve the goal
and, as it is high, the absolute
GAP is also relevant.
For Q2 the situation is a little bit
more worrying. One month and 2
weeks to go, it is still missing
more than 500 REs.
Brazil and Colombia needs to
speed up, but also Venezuela,
Argentina, Mexico and Ecuador,
Guatemala and Peru.
9.
10. Not a very good start for oGIP as both RA and RE behind of last
year.
For RA some RA couldn’t perform but mostly Mexico faced a
difficult situation, hope we can change in this 15 days.
For MA we have Argentina, Colombia and Mexico performing
and we hope it can continue until the end of the month.
For RE we are still facing a GAP mainly of Argentina, Brazil and
Colombia and we hope as it will be teaching peak, we can
overcome it.
11. Inference:
For Q1 we had a good result overall.
Almost achieved the goal and, despite
Brazil, Colombia and Argentina that
could not perform as good as expected,
Mexico did a very good job, as did in a
smaller scale Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador
and Costa Rica.
For Q2 still a lot to do, and mostly from
Brazil as they represent more than 50%
of our goal as a region. Most of other
entities are on track to achieve the goal,
so I do not see any trouble.
For Brazil: is it going the way you
expect? If there is any trouble just talk
to us!
12. Inference:
For Q1 we almost achieved our goal,
but just because some entities that
performed had no goal at all in
Teaching. Brazil could not deliver the 74
EPs (as the only with a high goal and
totally committed to move teaching in
IGN) but Colombia performed some and
also Mexico could deliver more than
expected.
For Q2 we do have a real goal, but it is
not looking promising. Brazil is pushing
their limits to make teaching happen,
but is still far behind. Other entities as
Argentina, Colombia and Venezuela still
have a lot to do.
13. oGIP is in the same situation as iGIP: we had a
good Q1 but still there is a lot to do for Q2, and
this time in both Marketing and Teaching.
For Marketing maybe the problem is lack of
TNs and destinations, but for Teaching for sure
it is not. Where is the problem: in the
promotion? To find your target audience? Let
us know and this way we can try helping you!
18. Well, not much to say here!
If you need TNs in Marketing, most probably
Brazil and Panama can provide very few and
some other entities 1 or 2 but that is it.
Do not focus your Marketing EPs for IGN, it is
far better to still concentrate your focus on
India.
19.
20.
21. Top LCs TN 3 Months: Uniatlantico (Colombia) and Porto Alegre (Brazil)
Top LCs TN 6 Months: Cartagena (Colombia) and Arequipa (Peru)
Top LCs EPs 3 Months: -
Top LCs EPs 6 Months: Uberlandia and Recibe (Brazil) and EAFIT (Colombia)
Combia, Brazil and Venezuela is the entities to look for if your need is EP. But
again, the opposite of Marketing here, as we cannot rely just in IGN to provide
the needed EPs.
Colombia, Mexico and Brazil still with the huge amount of TNs, but each entity
has a different project with a different timeline so I would really advice you to
contact them if you want to understand their Teaching project.
