7. Residential area
Huerta de las Pilas Lagoon
1
Mining area in the eighties.
After the watertable emerged, the hole was back filled and
covered. Today, the residential area of Huerta de las Pilas takes
up this area.
15. 1
Quarry in the 80’s:
The new lagoon disappeared
when the area was backfilled
Huerta de Las Pilas Lagoon
x
EIA (Environmental
EIA (Environmental
Impact Assessment)
Impact Assessment)
Directive 85/337/CEE
Directive 85/337/CEE
2
Environmental Impact
Environmental Impact
Statement 2003
Statement 2003
¡¡¡there has been a lagoon
¡¡¡there has been a lagoon
in the area since 2002!!!
in the area since 2002!!!
Attempt to stop
water springs
3
x
EIA (Environmental
EIA (Environmental
Impact Assessment)
Impact Assessment)
Directive 85/337/CEE
Directive 85/337/CEE
ACTIVITY:
ACTIVITY:
MINING
MINING
16. IMAGE
Date: 30th JUNE 2003
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT:
5th JULY 2003
MINERAL EXTRACTION¿CUT-AND-FILL WITH SIMULTANEOUS RESTORATION?
18. FOR YEARS, THE LAGOON WAS USED AS A CLANDESTINE RUBBISH
DUMP, WHICH INCREASED THE RISK OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
19. ALBERO DE LA BAHÍA TRIED TO LEGALISE THIS SITUATION BY WRITING OUT
A PRE-PROJECT TO LOCATE A RUBBISH DUMP IN THE AREA
JANUARY
2011
2
20. MARCH 2011 THE EUROPEAN
COMISSION DID NOT ANSWER
OUR QUESTION
21. WHAT ARE THE GOALS OF SPANISH AUTHORITIES?
TO FILL THE LAGOON
TO BUILD A NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
22. TODAY THE URBANIZATION IS PARALYSED
THANKS TO CITIZEN PRESSURE
BUT THE AREA STILL LACKS OFICIAL PROTECTION
23. D
RTE
O
REP
1. Ombudsman
2. Spanish Department for Environment
3. Municipality of Algeciras
4. Economy, Innovation and Science
Andalusian Council
5. Environment Andalusian Council
6. Andalusian Water Agency
-
7. ENVIRONMENTAL PROSECUTION
SERVICE
ALGECIRAS
FILED AWAY
24. Oficial institutions pass the buck to one another.
Also, they are constantly changing names,
which definately confuses the citizens.
26. 2013
ALBERO DE LA BAHIA (DEVELOPER)
WANTS TO MODIFY THE RESTORATION PLAN IMPOSED BY
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OF
2003, WHICH WAS NEVER CARRIED OUT
AND WHICH EXPIRED IN 2010
?????????????????
27. 2013
THE EUROPEAN COMISSION HAS DRAWN THE CONCLUSION
THAT THERE IS NO BREACH OF THE PROJECT
¿WHY, THEN, AREN’T WE GIVEN THE REQUESTED
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING PROGRAM?
WE THINK IT IS BECAUSE
IT DOESN’T EXIST
BECAUSE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMMENT
WAS PASSED A POSTERIORI, WHEN THE EXTRACTION HAD
ALREADY STARTED AND THE LAGOON HAD ALREADY
APPEARED…
28. This is the policy…
Developer
Citizens
Environment
35. THE EUROPEAN COMISSION OMITS OUR COMPLAINT ABOUT THE INFRACTION
OF AARHUS CONVENTION, DIRECTIVE 2000/60/CE AND DIRECTIVE 2004/35/CE.
THE COMISSION ONLY MENTIONS DIRECTIVE 92/43/CEE, WHICH IS ALSO BEING
VIOLATED AS THE MINING AREAS ARE ADJACENT TO NATURA 2000 SITES.
LAGOON
36. .
Water is a human right
THE STRAIT OF GIBRALTAR IS ONE OF THE
MOST IMPORTANT BIRD MIGRATION CORRIDORS
IN THE WORLD. BIRDS, LIKE US, NEED WATER
-NOT CONCRETE - TO SURVIVE.
WE INVITE ALL EURODEPUTIES AND MEMBERS OF THE
EUROPEAN COMISSION TO VISITE THE STRAIT OF
GIBRALTAR TO CHECK BY THEMSELVES THE PROBLEMS
THAT ARE AFFECTING BOTH CITIZENS AND THE
ENVIRONMENT IN SUCH A GLOBAL WAY.